Comparing performance of two simple workbooks

Hello guys,
i split one planning query with actual and budget columns into two separate queries (one shows only the actual columns, the other only the budget (entry-ready) columns). Then I created two simple workbooks, one with the large planning query in it and the other with the two separate queries on one sheet. Now I simply want to compare the performance of both workbooks against each other. How do I do this the easiest way? Do I need to install the technical content for this? I'm pretty new to performance measuring.
Many Thanks in advance,
Norbert

Ok, thanks for the quick response, that already helped me a lot. However, I'm still not sure how to read the statistics. When I just want to measure the time the workbook needs for loading after I've connected and chosen it from the 'open workbook' dialog. If I just open the analyzer, connect, open the workbook and then display statistics, three steps are shown with their result rows (see below):.
(Nav.) Step Counter     Event     Validity Period
1     Not Assigned      0,735344
1     RFC call      0,005681
1     Read System Info.      0,013980
1     Read Themes      0,000247
1     User Interaction      0,000000
1     Result      0,755252
2     Bytes Transferred      0,000000
2     Load Workbook      0,020858
2     Not Assigned      1,972510
2     Persist MIME      0,020032
2     Process Dialog      7,549633
2     RFC call      0,013190
2     User Interaction      0,000000
2     Wait Time, User      19,770217
2     Result      29,346440
3     Load Local Workbook      1,682202
3     Not Assigned      0,000106
3     RFC call      0,000723
3     Wait Time, User     - 1,520076
3     Result      0,162955
Overall Result           30,264647
Which event times actually belong to the loading of the workbook? The whole step 2 or 3? Both together? or just the rows 'load workbook' or 'load local workbook' in step 2 or 3?
Best Greets,
Norbert

Similar Messages

Compare performance of two different databases...idea of a report to us?

Dear Colleagues,
We would like to compare the performance of two different databases running with SAP. We don't want to start with Loadrunner. We are looking more for some ABAP program which generates a lot of load on the database and then would just run the program on both databases. Any idea for a good report? We thought about sgen, but we think this is taking more into account the application server instead of the database.
Regards,
alexander

Hello,
If you are not willing to use tools like HP Loadrunner or IBM Rational performance testing
SGEN could be an option. It is quite intensively using the DB. It will be hard to find a report that only perform DB access.
SGEN at least allows to test read (REPOSRC, DYNPSOURCE...) & write (REPOLOAD, DYNPLOAD...). If the DBs are on the same servers as the SAP system and both servers has the same power it can be a good way to test.
Best regards

How can I compare more than two VIs at a same time in labview 2009

How can I compare more than two VIs at the same time. I am an Lab Engineer I have to check assignments submitted by students and I want to know how many of them are copied from each other. Labview compare VI can only compare two VI at a time while I want to check about 30 VIs at same time.
Regards,

I'm not aware of a tool to compare multiple VIs. If you don't find anything, consider posting this to the LabVIEW Idea Exchange to expose this idea directly to NI R&D.
Thanks!
- Greg J

I just loaded the 'lion' now my mail takes a new life....how do i move the reading panel to the bottom / also how do i get rid of the text/content under each mail..two simple things not sure obvious on this version !!!

i just loaded the 'lion' now my mail takes a new life....how do i move the reading panel to the bottom / also how do i get rid of the text/content under each mail..two simple things not sure obvious on this version !!!

How to compare data between two tables?

Hi,
My team is trying to develop a SAP data migration tool (DMT) using ABAP.
One of the functionalities in the DMT is to validate the data in the staging area against the loaded SAP data.
The tables in the stagin area are customer tables (i.e. user-defined tables starting with Y, Z).
How do I compare the data in the staging area against data that are loaded into SAP tables? Are there some built-in SAP functions to do this? Or, are there some better ways of doing this (e.g. instead of comparing against data in the SAP tables, we compare with some INTERNAL tables)?
Any help would be greatly appreciated, thanks!

Hi Kian,
Use <b>SCMP</b> transaction to compare data between two tables and you can not use this for comparing internal tables.
Thanks,
Vinay

How to compare dates between two items

Hello all,
I am trying to compare dates in two items.
The first item is a computation P45_PAGE_LOADED_TIME
select sysdate from dual;
This essentially keeps track of when the user opened the form. They are accessing data that may become obsolete while they are in the form.
So we have a dynamic action that finds the last_update date from a table. This field is of type date. It is placed in a text field called P45_STATUS.
We then have a notification which we want to fire when P45_PAGE_LOADED_TIME is before P45_STATUS. We tried the following condition
declare
least_date date;
begin
SELECT LEAST(TO_DATE(:P45_STATUS),TO_DATE(:P45_PAGE_LOADED_TIME)) into least_date
from dual;
if least_date = to_date(:P45_STATUS) then
return false;
else
return true;
end if;
end;
Any guidance would be most appreciated.
Thanks

Maybe your better off putting your anonymous block into a plsql function.
A function that you can test. If it works in plsql then you must call it in APEX.
I kinda get a headache when I see that least, to_date, to_date query (although I've seen worse :p)
Make it like:
create or replace function fun_least_date(in_status in varchar2,
                                                           in_page_loaded_time varchar2) return boolean
is
l_status date;
l_page_loaded_time date;
least_date date;
l_return boolean;
begin
l_status := to_date(in_status, 'FORMAT MASK!!!');
l_page_loaded_time := to_date(in_page_loaded_time, 'FORMAT MASK!!!!');
least_date := least(l_status, l_page_loaded_time);
if least_date = l_status then
    l_return := false;
else
    l_return := true;
end if;
return l_return
end fun_least_date;If your sure that your function is correct then use it as a condition for your dynamic action.
Regards
Nico
ps: I haven't tested that function. Be aware that you most correctly enter the format mask you use in APEX. Also before APEX may know about these variables you should set a dynamic action on your items to always submit their value to the server when they change!!!

Function module for comparing contents of two internal tables

Hi All,
Is there any function module to compare contents of two internal tables of same structure?
If yes please let me know.
Thanks in advance.
Amol

Hi
call SE16 with table TFTIT in order to get a full list (it will be long...)
A list of FMs with parameters can be found in table FUNCT.
Finally go to sm37rsdf4
that will give you all the function modules with description
Here is the list:
http://www.erpgenie.com/abap/functions.htm
hope this helps...
Regards
CSM Reddy

Need to compare values in two columns of one table against values in two columns in another table

Hi, as the title reads, I'm looking for an approach that will allow me to compare values in two columns of one table against values in two columns in another table.
Say, for instance, here are my tables:
Table1:
Server,Login
ABCDEF,JOHN
ABCDEF,JANE
FEDCBA,SEAN
FEDCBA,SHAWN
Table2:
Server,Login
ABCDEF,JOHN
ABCDEF,JANE
FEDCBA,SHAWN
In comparing the two tables, I'd like my query to report the rows in table1 NOT found in table2. In this case, it'll be the 3rd row of table one:
Server,Login
FEDCBA,SEAN
Thanks.

create table Table1([Server] varchar(50), Login varchar(50))
Insert into Table1 values ('ABCDEF','JOHN'),('ABCDEF','JANE'),('FEDCBA','SEAN'),('FEDCBA','SHAWN')
create table Table2([Server] varchar(50), Login varchar(50))
Insert into Table2 values ('ABCDEF','JOHN'),('ABCDEF','JANE'), ('FEDCBA','SHAWN')
select [Server] ,Login from Table1
Except
select [Server] ,Login from Table2
select [Server] ,Login from Table1 t1
where not exists(Select 1 from Table2 where t1.[Server] = t1.[Server] AND Login=t1.Login)
drop table Table1,Table2

Urgent support by two simple requirements

Hello,
i need support by two simple requirements.
Can someone tell me, whether it is possible to realize these in context of SAP XI /SAP Web AS
Graph showing relationships between Tables, DB Spaces & OS File system?
(Yes/No)
Can all jobs and/or scripts be re-run after failure without risk to production data (i.e. stepwise recovery)?
(Yes/No)
Thank you very much!
Regards
A. Henke

Hi Axel,
As far as your first requirement is concerned we can do that in SAP WAS very well with the help of WebDynpro. You need to use Business Graphics for that purpose, see the following link for details,
/people/sap.user72/blog/2005/03/23/business-graphics-in-webdynpro
Well for the other one you need to use job scheduling in JAVA with the help of say Quartz or something like that so that you can run timely jobs.
I hope it helps you.
Best regards,
Guru.

Compare performance SUN SPARC IV+ and SPARC VII

Anyone have experience on SUN Sparc VII and Compare Performance between SUN Sparc IV+ and Sparc VII ?
Thank.

read http://blogs.sun.com/mrbenchmark/
particularly http://blogs.sun.com/mrbenchmark/entry/oltp_performance_of_the_sun

Performance of BEx Analyzer workbook

Hi gurus, I'm asking you a simple question.
Actually I'm working to improve the performance of a workbook that contains 39 queries and 18 sheets.
The problem is that the time to execute the whole workbook is much more than the time to execute every single query.
So my question is simple: there are issue to check from a Bex point of view to improve the performance? For example, the number of sheets have impact on the performance? The presence of images have impact? Or maybe the number of total cells (used by the queries and not used by the queries) used inside the workbook?
Thank you for your replies.

Hi Gabriele,
Few thoughts: -
1) Change the query read mode based on your query design and data access. You can do this by using transaction RSRT.
2) Don't include two much of the characteristic in the rows section in the query. If you want a drill down for 10 characteristic, then include those characteristic in the query (in rows) that receives all the data sets. In the workbook include all the drill-downs that are desired and save the workbook. This will faster compared to including all the characteristic in the query itself.
Few other things to look at: -
1) If you just want to display a characteristic value then use "display attribute" rather than a navigational attribute.
2)If possible try to avoid the use of virtual characteristics and key figures in the reports.
3) Try to avoid complex structures in the reports.
4) If you are having major performance issues with BEx reporting then switch to Web reporting. Web reporting is much faster compared to excel based Bex reporting. But keep in mind that if your users are having certain excel macros then it is not going to be easy.
Take a look oss note
557870 'FAQ BW Query Performance'
and 567746 'Composite note BW 3.x performance Query and Web'.
Some of Good help doc's
[https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/3f66ba90-0201-0010-ac8d-b61d8fd9abe9]
[https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/cccad390-0201-0010-5093-fd9ec8157802]
[https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/ce7fb368-0601-0010-64ba-fadc985a1f94]
[https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/c8c4d794-0501-0010-a693-918a17e663cc]
Hope it helps.
Regards,
NR

Query performance in two environments

Hi all,
I have developed simple select queries on a multiprovider and I am facing issues with query performance in quality box. A query runs pretty fast in in dev and return results while the same one dumps in Quality environment giving a time out error. This sounds more strange because our dev box has comparitively more records than the quality environment right now.
On anlyzing the query path in both environments, we noticed that the query does an index scan in dev but not in Quality environment, especially when the selection is such that the query is supposed to return lot of records. Since the query does a sequential scan in quality, it dumps. Is there any setting that I need to make seprately in the quality environment.
Any tips on query optimization would be great help. Thanks
Regards
Niranjana

Execute some of the RSRT tests in the QA for the query using "Execute+Debug" option and use some test for Multiprovider and Databases checks in it ,try to compare with Dev as well.
Hope it Helps
Chetan
@CP..

How to compare substring in two tables fields

Hi ABAP expert,
When I want to select database two tables, we just want to compare two table substring. For Example, both fields have yyyymmdd. But I have interested yyyymm. In the Oracle database and SQL server database, I can easily to use substr to achieve those goals. How in the ABAP program to archive those goals.
Thanks in advance,
Cliff Fan

Hi you can access substrings in ABAP the following way:
data: s type string value 'yyyymmdd'.
write: / s(6). "yyyymm
write: / s+4(4). "mmdd
so the number after '+' determines the position in the string and the number in parenthesis () determines the length of the substring.
Now you can just loop over both of your tables and perform the necessary comparison in the nested loop.

Compare tables in two schemas for the table with particular column & value

Hello All,
I have a query to find out the list of table from a given schema to extract all the tables having a search column .
ex :
SELECT OWNER, TABLE_NAME, COLUMN_NAME FROM
ALL_TAB_COLUMNS WHERE OWNER='<SCHEMA_NAME>'
AND COLUMN_NAME='<COLUMN_NAME>'
I want to compare two schemas for the same above query .
Can we wirte a query on this - I am using SQL DEVELOPER , which has menu item - TOOL - database differneces to find the diffenence between two schemas but my requirement is to find the differences in two schemas for all the tables matching for a particular column ( as given in quer).
Appreciate your help.
thanks/Kumar
Edited by: kumar73 on 29 Nov, 2012 1:50 PM

Hi, Kumar,
This is the SQL and PL/SQL forum. If you have a question about SQL Developer, then the SQL Developer is a better place to post it. Mark this thread as "Answered" before starting another thread for the same question.
If SQL Developer has a tool for doing what you want, don't waste your time trying to devise a SQL solution. The SQL Developer way will probably be simpler, more efficient and more reliable.
If you do need to try a SQL solution, then post some sample data (CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements for a table that resembles all_tab_columns; you can call it my_tab_columns) and the results you want from that data.

Performance between two partitionned tables with different structure

Hi,
I would like if there is a difference between two partitionned tables with different structure in term of performance (access, query, insertions, updates ).
I explain myself in detail :
I have a table that stores one value every 10 minutes in a day (so we have 144 values (24*6) in the whole day), with the corresponding id.
Here is the structure :
| Table T1 |
+ id PK |
+ date PK |
+ sample1 |
+ sample2 |
+ ... |
+ sample144 |
The table is partionned on the column date, with a partionned every months. The primary key is based on the columns (id, date).
There is an additionnal index on the column (id) (is it useful ?).
I would like to know if it is better to have a table with just (id, date, value) , so for one row in the first table we'll have 144 rows in the future? table. The partition will already be on the columns (id, date) with the index associated.
What are the gains or loss in performance with this new structure ( access, DMLs , storage ) ?
I discuss with the Java developers and they say it is simpler to manage in their code.
Oracle version : Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
Thanks & Regards
From France
Oliver
Edited by: 998239 on 5 avr. 2013 01:59

I mean storage in tablespaces and datafiles on disk.
Can you justify please and give me concrete arguments why the two structures are equivalent ( except inserting data in T(id, date,value))
because i have to make a report.i didnt say any thing like
two structures are equivalent ( except inserting data in T(id, date,value)i said
About structure : TABLE1(id, date, value) is better than TABLE1(id, date, sample1, .... sample144)because
1) oracle has restriction for numbers of column. Ok you can have 144 columns now but for future if you must have more than 1000 columns , what will you do?
2) Restrictions on Table Compression (Table compression is not supported for tables with more than 255 columns.)
3) store same type values on diffrent columns is bad practise
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28318/schema.htm#i4383
i remember i seen Toms article about this but now i cant find it sorry ((( if i found i will post here

Comparing performance of two simple workbooks

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for