Comparison for clob type

Hi All,
Can Anyone please tell how to compare clob type in select query with where condition ?
Ex: field: Desc_ short(Clob )
field ean_code(number,pk)
And i want to see those ean_code list matching to particullar clob pattern matching in the record in any where in the record.
Please help.
Thanks and regards,
DK.

COMPARE function
This function compares two entire LOBs or parts of two LOBs. You can only compare LOBs of the same datatype (LOBs of BLOB type with other BLOBs, and CLOBs with CLOBs, and BFILEs with BFILEs). For BFILEs, the file must be already opened using a successful FILEOPEN operation for this operation to succeed.
COMPARE returns zero if the data exactly matches over the range specified by the offset and amount parameters. Otherwise, a non-zero INTEGER is returned.
For fixed-width n-byte CLOBs, if the input amount for COMPARE is specified to be greater than (4294967295/n), then COMPARE matches characters in a range of size (4294967295/n), or Max(length(clob1), length(clob2)), whichever is lesser.
Syntax
DBMS_LOB.COMPARE (
   lob_1            IN BLOB,
   lob_2            IN BLOB,
   amount           IN INTEGER := 4294967295,
   offset_1         IN INTEGER := 1,
   offset_2         IN INTEGER := 1)
RETURN INTEGER;
DBMS_LOB.COMPARE (
   lob_1            IN CLOB CHARACTER SET ANY_CS,
   lob_2            IN CLOB CHARACTER SET lob_1%CHARSET,
   amount           IN INTEGER := 4294967295,
   offset_1         IN INTEGER := 1,
   offset_2         IN INTEGER := 1)
RETURN INTEGER;
DBMS_LOB.COMPARE (
   lob_1            IN BFILE,
   lob_2            IN BFILE,
   amount           IN INTEGER,
   offset_1         IN INTEGER := 1,
   offset_2         IN INTEGER := 1)
RETURN INTEGER;
Pragmas
pragma restrict_references(COMPARE, WNDS, WNPS, RNDS, RNPS);
Parameters
Table 17-7 COMPARE Function Parameters
Parameter Description
lob_1        LOB locator of first target for comparison.
lob_2        LOB locator of second target for comparison.
amount Number of bytes (for BLOBs) or characters (for CLOBs) to compare.
offset_1 Offset in bytes or characters on the first LOB (origin: 1) for the comparison.
offset_2 Offset in bytes or characters on the first LOB (origin: 1) for the comparison.
Returns
INTEGER: Zero if the comparison succeeds, non-zero if not.
NULL, if
amount < 1
amount > LOBMAXSIZE
offset_1 or offset_2 < 1
offset_1 or offset_2 > LOBMAXSIZE
Exceptions
Table 17-8 COMPARE Function Exceptions for BFILE operations
Exception Description
UNOPENED_FILE
File was not opened using the input locator.
NOEXIST_DIRECTORY
Directory does not exist.
NOPRIV_DIRECTORY
You do not have privileges for the directory.
INVALID_DIRECTORY
Directory has been invalidated after the file was opened.
INVALID_OPERATION
File does not exist, or you do not have access privileges on the file.
http://www.java2s.com/Code/Oracle/System-Packages/Usedbmslobcomparetocompare.htm

Similar Messages

Creating query on Bex - Quaterly comparison for statistical & Actual

Hi All,
I would like to create a query for 'Quarterly comparison for statistical & Actual periods'.
My Key Figures should be
1) Plan 1st Qtr (Fiscal year, Period: 1 to 3, Value type : 1(Plan), Version : 0(Plan/actual), Valuation View: actual Value).
2)1st Qtr (Fiscal year, Period: 1 to 3, "Value type : 4(Actual),11(Actual statistical)", Version : 0(Plan/actual), Valuation View: actual Value).
3)Var 1st Qt (Plan 1st qtr - 1st Qtr)
same thing for 4 Quaters. finally with
4)Plan Year (Fiscal year, Period: 1 to 12, Value type : 1(Plan), Version : 0(Plan/actual), Valuation View: actual Value).
I created a structure and created key figures with selections and formulas as required. But I did not see any data when I ran this query.
The report was generated with 'no applicable data'.
I need to create this query with plan 1st Qtr, Ist Qtr, Var 1st Qtr, Plan 2nd Qtr, 2nd Qtr, Var 2nd Qtr, Plan 3rd Qtr, 3rd Qtr, Var 3rd Qtr, Plan 4th Qtr, 4th Qtr, Var 4th Qtr, Plan year. key figures.
Please let me know how can I create this query with these Key Figiures.
Any help would be appreciated. Please respond with the reply.
Thanks,
Aparna.

Hi
The best way is then to run a report with your KF without any restriction, and the different chars in the drill down: Fiscal year, Period:, Value type, Version , Valuation View
Then you can check that you have some information with the combination of values of your chars:
Fiscal year, Period: 1 to 3, Value type : 1(Plan), Version : 0(Plan/actual), Valuation View: actual Value.
If you find a actual Value in the fiscal period you are looking at, for the period 1 to 3, for the Valuation type 1, for the version 0, then create arestricted KF by adding the restrictions one at a time....You moght discover why you do not get the results
PY

JDBC ADPATER - "Unsupported feature" in XI with CLOB type

Hi experts,
I have 15 patch XI level. In a stored procedure i use an in and out parameter with CLOB type. I get the exception:
com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.DeliveryException: Error processing request in sax parser: Error when executing statement for table/stored proc. 'XXXX'): java.sql.SQLException: Unsupported feature
If i change the type CLOB by VARVHAR in the XI's XML (Design: Integration Buider), all works fine.
The strored procedure has this parameter like CLOB.
My question is
Is not possible to use the CLOB type?
SAP recognize that it, it's possible:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/2e/96fd3f2d14e869e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
Sorry for my english. Thanks in advance.

Hi,
Please make sure you use the 10.x driver for full stored procedure CLOB support.
A CLOB is a not comparable Datatype in SQL.
Regards,
Prateek

Unit test for object types

In the current version (2.1.0.63) I can perform only unit test for packages, function and procedures. But we use a lot of object types in the database and would like to test them. Is there any support for object types scheduled?

You can also use the original UT PLSQL package from sourceforge.
I have used this in the past for testing with file comparisons, table object output from procedures, etc.
We've also used the same setup for Oracle Forms code testing.
Dennis

Field Seletion for movement type / acct differes for BA

dear all
while posting in MM the user is facing the problem and error message
Field Seletion for movement type / acct differes for BA
please let me know if i can do some thing with Field status variant in FI
I am not able to figure this out

If you Run Program RM07CUFA in SE38 and compare movement type and GL you can see the
comparison of the field status variant of the movement type and GL
Hope this will resolve your issue
Bilal

SqlEjava.sql.SQLException: Data size bigger than max size for this type: 52

SqlEjava.sql.SQLException: Data size bigger than max size for this type: 5200
can any one help how to resolve this error

Im using clob object I want to insert more data
how to insert more data

ORA-22835: Buffer too small for CLOB to CHAR or BLOB to RAW conversion

Hi all,
the following query select to_char(nvl(round(pc.target_cost*xx_primavera.geteurtolvrate,2),amount),'FM999G999G999G999G990D00') detail_amount,
nvl(ct.cost_type, description) detail_description,
tm_desc.memo_id,
primavera_prj_name detail_prj_name,
hp.party_number detail_party_number,
xpid.interface_line_attribute1,
utl_i18n.unescape_reference(replace(regexp_replace(utl_raw.cast_to_varchar2(tm_desc.task_memo), '<[^>]*>'), chr(13)||chr(10))) document_description,
REPLACE(regexp_replace(utl_raw.cast_to_varchar2(tm_id.task_memo), '<[^>]*>'), chr(13)||chr(10)) prim_memo_client_id
from XX_PRIMAVERA_INVOICES_DETAIL xpid
join admuser.xx_ar_hz_parties xahp on xahp.orig_system_bill_customer_id = xpid.orig_system_bill_customer_id
join hz_parties hp on hp.party_id = xahp.party_id
left join admuser.projcost pc on pc.proj_id = xpid.primavera_prj_id and pc.cost_type_id != 29 and xpid.service_code = 8 and pc.task_id = xx_primavera.getTaskId(xpid.primavera_prj_id,'A1020', 'Изготвяне на оферта') and delete_session_id is null
left join admuser.costtype ct on ct.cost_type_id = pc.cost_type_id
left join admuser.taskmemo tm_id on tm_id.proj_id = xpid.primavera_prj_id and tm_id.memo_type_id = 53 and tm_id.task_id = xx_primavera.getTaskId(xpid.primavera_prj_id,'A1020', 'Изготвяне на оферта')
left join admuser.taskmemo tm_desc on tm_desc.proj_id = xpid.primavera_prj_id and tm_desc.memo_type_id = 55 and tm_desc.task_id = xx_primavera.getTaskId(xpid.primavera_prj_id,'A1020', 'Изготвяне на оферта')
where amount != 0
and xpid.interface_line_attribute1 = :ra_ctp_attribute1
ORDER BY xpid.primavera_prj_name, xpid.description;returns error:
ORA-22835: Buffer too small for CLOB to CHAR or BLOB to RAW conversion (actual: 2371, maximum: 2000) I found that the error occurs in the row : utl_i18n.unescape_reference(replace(regexp_replace(utl_raw.cast_to_varchar2(tm_desc.task_memo), '<[^>]*>'), chr(13)||chr(10))) document_description,and tried to change it to: utl_i18n.unescape_reference(replace(regexp_replace(utl_raw.cast_to_varchar2(dbms_lob.substr(tm_desc.task_memo,1,2000)), '<[^>]*>'), chr(13)||chr(10))) document_description,....but it returns not value for that field... am i using dbms_lob.substr at the wrong place? The column 'tm_desc.task_memo' is BLOB type.
Any ideas how to cheat it ?
Version: Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
PL/SQL Release 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
"CORE     11.1.0.7.0     Production"
TNS for Linux: Version 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.1.0.7.0 - ProductionThanks in advance,
Bahchevanov.

Your second example has the parameters reversed. The amount (length) comes first and then the offset:
DBMS_LOB.SUBSTR (
   lob_loc     IN    BLOB,
   amount      IN    INTEGER := 32767,
   offset      IN    INTEGER := 1)
RETURN RAW;
DBMS_LOB.SUBSTR (
   lob_loc     IN    CLOB   CHARACTER SET ANY_CS,
   amount      IN    INTEGER := 32767,
   offset      IN    INTEGER := 1)
RETURN VARCHAR2 CHARACTER SET lob_loc%CHARSET;
DBMS_LOB.SUBSTR (
   file_loc     IN    BFILE,
   amount      IN    INTEGER := 32767,
   offset      IN    INTEGER := 1)
RETURN RAW;Also, remember that # of bytes is not necessarily the same as the # of characters depending on your character set. So 2000 bytes might become 4000 characters. And you have to make sure the BLOB is actually character data and not arbitrary binary data.
Post the results of reversing the parameters and using a smaller chunk size.

Fld selectn for mvmt type 601 / acct 40005900 differs for Customer goods mo

pls guide the correct path
i done delivey document but while doing PGI
i am getting this error
"Fld selectn for mvmt type 601 / acct 40005900 differs for Customer goods movement (015)
Message no. M7093
Diagnosis
Comparison of the field selection strings from movement type 601 and G/L account 40005900 has revealed that there is an incompatible field selection combination at one or more points
pls help me out

Hi
For mvt type 601,in OMJJ, customer field is set as optional.
You can check this in OMJJ - mvt type 601 - field selections - Material management.
Check in FS00 - the field status group assigned to GL account - 40005900, then open the attributes of that field selection group in OBC4, check customer field is suprresed.
You can change either (suggest to check with FI consultant to change in field status group).
Alternatively you can run RM07CUFA program with variants to compare these two settings and make necessary changes.
Thanks

Print clob type

How to print a clob type? I cannot do it using htp.p because the parameter's type is varchar2. I need clob type because the column content is more than 4000 chars (the maximum of varchar2 type).
thanks,
Jan

you can create a procedure that cuts your CLOB file into VARCHAR2(4000) variables with a loop and read the concatenated results in your browser.
It works fine for me :
Create or Replace MY_PROCEDURE
as
locator_var CLOB;
amount_var INTEGER;
offset_var INTEGER;
output_var VARCHAR2(4000);
length_var INTEGER;
counter INTEGER;
i integer;
begin
select MY_CLOB into locator_var from MY_TABLE where CONDITION;
length_var := DBMS_LOB.GETLENGTH(locator_var);
counter := CEIL(length_var/4000);
-- set the variables
offset_var := 1;
-- check that the length left to read is more or less than 4000 chars--
if length_var >= 4000 then
amount_var := 4000;
else amount_var := length_var;
end if;
-- cuts the CLOB into as many pieces as we need and prints it into the browser.
-- if the text is HTML code, the HTML page will be displayed
for i in 1..counter
loop
DBMS_LOB.READ(locator_var, amount_var, offset_var, output_var);
htp.p(output_var);
offset_var := offset_var + 4000;
length_var := length_var - 4000;
if length_var >= 4000 then
offset_var := 4000;
else offset_var := length_var;
end if;
end loop;
end;
I hope this helps.
Bertrand.

ORA-22835: Buffer too small for CLOB to CHAR on Solaris but not Windows

Hi,
I get the following error on Solaris but not Windows equivalent 10.2 installations
ORA-22835: Buffer too small for CLOB to CHAR or BLOB to RAW conversion (actual: 4575, maximum: 4000)
ORA-06512: at line 65
the code causing the problem is:
SELECT A.TABLE_NAME, A.DEFAULT_DIRECTORY_NAME, B.LOCATION,
CASE
WHEN INSTR(A.ACCESS_PARAMETERS,'RECORDS FIXED')<>0 THEN
SUBSTR(A.ACCESS_PARAMETERS,INSTR(A.ACCESS_PARAMETERS,'RECORDS FIXED')+14,3)
ELSE NULL
END RSZ FROM USER_EXTERNAL_TABLES A, USER_EXTERNAL_LOCATIONS B
WHERE A.TABLE_NAME = B.TABLE_NAME(+);
the entire code being executed is:
DECLARE
EX BOOLEAN;
CNT NUMBER;
SQL1 VARCHAR2(4000);
FLEN NUMBER;
BSIZE NUMBER;
TABNAME VARCHAR2(4000);
DEFDIR VARCHAR2(4000);
RSZ VARCHAR2(4000);
ECODE NUMBER(38);
ERRMSG VARCHAR2(4000);
CURSOR C1 IS
SELECT A.TABLE_NAME, A.DEFAULT_DIRECTORY_NAME, B.LOCATION,
CASE
WHEN INSTR(A.ACCESS_PARAMETERS,'RECORDS FIXED')<>0 THEN
SUBSTR(A.ACCESS_PARAMETERS,INSTR(A.ACCESS_PARAMETERS,'RECORDS FIXED')+14,3)
ELSE NULL
END RSZ FROM USER_EXTERNAL_TABLES A, USER_EXTERNAL_LOCATIONS B
WHERE A.TABLE_NAME = B.TABLE_NAME(+);
TYPE C1_TYPE IS TABLE OF C1%ROWTYPE;
REC1 C1_TYPE;
BEGIN
OPEN C1;
FETCH C1 BULK COLLECT INTO REC1;
FOR I IN REC1.FIRST .. REC1.LAST
LOOP
UTL_FILE.FGETATTR(NVL(REC1(I).DEFAULT_DIRECTORY_NAME,'CARDSLOAD'),
REC1(I).LOCATION, EX, FLEN, BSIZE);
IF EX THEN
IF INSTR(TO_CHAR(REC1(I).RSZ),'\.')<>0 THEN
     DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('INVALID RECORDSIZE OR CORRUPTED FILE');
     END IF;
     DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Table Name: ' || TO_CHAR(REC1(I).TABLE_NAME));
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('File Exists '||REC1(I).LOCATION);
     DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('File Length: ' || TO_CHAR(FLEN));
     DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Record Size: ' || TO_CHAR(REC1(I).RSZ));
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Block Size: ' || TO_CHAR(BSIZE));
     DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('# RECORDS: ' || FLEN/TO_NUMBER(REC1(I).RSZ));
     BEGIN
     CNT:='';
     SQL1:='SELECT COUNT(*) FROM '|| REC1(I).TABLE_NAME;
     EXECUTE IMMEDIATE SQL1 INTO CNT;
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('SELECT COUNT FOR: ' || REC1(I).TABLE_NAME||' = '||CNT);
     EXCEPTION
     WHEN OTHERS THEN
     DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('SELECT COUNT FAILED FOR: ' || REC1(I).TABLE_NAME);
     ECODE := SQLCODE;
ERRMSG := SQLERRM;
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE(ECODE||' '||ERRMSG);
     END;
ELSE
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE(REC1(I).TABLE_NAME||' '||REC1(I).LOCATION||' File Does Not Exist');
END IF;
     DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('-----------------------------------------------------');
END LOOP;
CLOSE C1;
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS THEN RAISE;
END;
Any ideas why Solaris but not Windows would have this problem?
Thanks,
Victor

Check out Bug 4715104 - ORA-22835 / truncated data from USER/ALL/DBA_EXTERNAL_TABLES

What control i can use for Clob datatype in forms?

Hi,
Backend side
I had created a table that having a column namely sql_text which hold the query string and defined as CLOB data type.
On Form 6i
Just i created a textitem(long) for the clob datatype field
but it only hold very limited length of charter, i want to be more. Any other control is there?
please guid me what should i want to do.
kanish

There is limited support for CLOBs in Forms. I guess you could read it in piecemeal with a procedure using the DBMS_LOB package

A realistic assessment of your experiences of hardware needed for the type of editing I do please.

Introduction:
I apologise for the length of this post but from experience of reading here, I'm working on the principle of the more I explain about myself now, the less anyone willing to help me will have to ask later.
I have lurked around this forum on and off for a few years, read the various threads in the FAQ section, particularly PPBM5 and What PC to build thread and other related topics around what system to build. I have found them very useful and in particular have enjoyed reading about Harm Millaard's experiences First Ideas for a new system. For about about 12 months I've been delaying upgrading my PC but in Mr Millard's latest updates on his PPBM6 site he talks about new systems and provides a link to Intel's time line which suggests they are in no rush to replace the i739xx series CPU chip - which has I believe amongst other things 2 cores disabled. Normally bitter experience has taught me not to rush out and buy the latest technology but let others "test" it first and then benefit from reduced prices as that model is replaced. However, it now seems like last years technology is going to remain as this years technology and probably the first 2 quarters at least of next year and, if anything, the price of the i739xx series is at best staying at it's existing launch price or even rising. So it's time to take the plunge for me and upgrade.
My current hardware for editing:
I started with Premier 6.5 after I bought it as part of a bundle with a Matrox RTX 10 card - one of the most temperamental pieces of hardware I've had the misfortune to work with. I later upgraded to Premiere Pro 1.5 and edited with that using a Pentium 4 2.6 (overclocked to 3.2), 3 hard drives (no raid) and 4G of memory. The video footage used was avi recorded using a Canon MVX 30i and Panasonic NVGS27 and now I've added the Casio Exilim EX -FC100 (mpeg format) and a Panasonic HDC S90 (AVCHD).
My PC coped with the editing I did with avi footage but couldn't handle AVCHD format and this convinced me to upgrade to Premiere Pro CS5.5. At the same time I switched to editing on a Dell XPS M1530 (Centrino duo chip) - I upped the memory to 4GB, put Windows 7 64 bit home edition on and replaced the existing hard drive with a faster one. In addition I use a SATA Quickport duo attached to my laptop via an eSATA card. However, either the Quickport, eSATA card or XPS is extremely temperamental - I never see two external hard drives, 50% of the time see 1 external drive or none at all - when that happens I edit around it doing things I can with just the one internal drive - but this problem is not my question.
The type of editing i do:
I know people usually say around here not to try editing on laptops and believe me, I understand why, but using this setup I have been able to edit lots of videos - see here for examples of the type of editing I currently do:
http://www.youtube.com/user/PathfinderPro
The equipment test videos place the biggest strain on the hardware when editing. And, to do this editing I have to convert my AVCHD footage in to it's YouTube format before editing and even after I've done that it can be tediously slow to edit and playback even with premiere set to play at 1/4 normal quality. To convert the AVCHD footage to the YouTube format I edit in has to be done over many nights.
Now I am not a professional, I typically edit with up to 4 tracks of video with additional tracks for titles and my target audience is YouTube - which is why I can get away without editing in my prefered option of native AVCHD video format. However, I'm tired of all the waiting, stuttering, and many many days and hours of converting videos into a format I can use so I'm looking to upgrade. My problem is though I'm uncertain what path to take. The PPBM results are dominated by overclocked chips, and whilst the motherboard make and model is listed, the hard disks used, graphic card makes and models and memory modules are not. This is not a criticism of the PPMB tables (big thank you to Bill Gehrke & Harm Millaard for taking the time and effort to pull this much information together) but for me, I am not interested in being in the top 1000 in the world, nor overclocking like mad, and having had horror experiences of using matrox products and compatibility and stability issues with other hardware I'm more interested in compatability and practicality than speed when deciding what to build. I've also read the threads about marvel controllers, dual and quad channel memory support, the pro's and cons of SSD or standard drives, raid setups, the heat problems with overclocking the newer ivy bridge chips and general build advice etc so I'm not coming here without having done some reading first.
The type of system I'm thinking of:
So far based on what I've read here, I've come to the conclusion - but I'm open to suggestion:
- Chip - regrettably due to the cost and unlikely successor anytime soon - a 39xx (with appropriate cooler) because I want to edit in native AVCHD which seems to require the warrior type chip as opposed to the "economical" build regardless of what my target audience is and this suggests
- X79 motherboard (which must have an old PCI slot such as the Asus Sabertooth and which has room for the cooler I'm considering). As I will be carrying over my old terretec DMX 6 fire 24/96 soundcard - all my videos have their audio mastered in Audition using this card - best piece of advice I read was the audience will watch a bad video with good sound editing but not the other way round)
- 4 hard drives plus additional hard drive for operating system using onboard raid controllers (not sure whether the operating system drive will be WD caviar black or SSD and can't justify cost of external raid controller for either my type of use or number of hard drives being used)
- Video card - I can now buy a GTX 580 for less than the 670 - so not sure on the card especially based on Harm Millards observations that memory bandwith seems to be as important as CUDA cores
- Case - I have an Akasa 62 case with room for 5 hard drives - I won't be exceeding that, and if I overclock it will only be by a little so is it really necessary to replace it for a Tower Case - although I would prefer a case with a front connection for esata so I may have to change the case regardless
- Maximum memory 32G - so is it necessary to upgrade to windows 7 professional?
- Power source - I'll work out when I've decided on my components.
Help please:
For me it's video source/dictated software chosen and hardware/audience(youtube) dictates format edited in. As I don't intend to change my camcorders format (AVCHD or mpeg) in the next couple of years and I'm not interested in having the "fastest" system around what I'm really interested in learning is:
what system setups people use now for doing similar editing to me
what make/models of the component parts in your system work well together
and if you do have a bottle neck in terms of hardware, where is it and what hardware would you change to (not a dream model change, just a practical and realistic one)
I have deliberately not given a budget for the changes I'm intending because budget should not be the deciding factor in determining what I "need" to upgrade to for the "type of editing I do" - especially bearing in mind I've got by so far (admitedly at a tortoise pace) with by todays standards a standard spec laptop. Basically I don't want a Rolls Royce to go shopping at Wallmart but I'm tired of walking there and carrying everything back by hand!
Thank you very much for any help / experiences people can share.

Thank you both for your prompt and helpful replies.
Mr Millaard, regarding your excellent article Planning and Building an NLE system, I have read it a couple of times now and it was your article which finally convinced me the time was now to upgrade but within it you said for good reason "Initial choice of CPU: i7-39xx with the intention to overclock to 4.6 - 4.8 GHz", hence my uncertainty about the CPU to use. I have seen a video you posted here - I think it was based on your cats (which I incidently enjoyed) so working on the editing done there (but not remembering if you mentioned what video format you used) and others who have mentioned many pro's for the i7-39xx I was leaning towards that - but I'm financially relieved at least - if the i3770 will do, although now with the possible recommendation by JEShort01 (sorry not sure of the forum etiquette for use of names) of the 2600K overclocked I'm a little bit back in the position of which is more suitable especially with the update to the i3770 being nearer than i7-39xx. This still makes me lean towards the i7-39xx.
Regarding the editing, the match play you can see on the channel is indeed 1 camera basic edits - multiple titles used to provide the score board. However, the coaching videos use mulitple cameras - 3 to 4 sometimes (another reason for upgrading to CS5.5 for the multi cam editing support) and the equipment testing video can use 3 or 4 tracks layered on top of each other other with each track having opacity settings and multiple motion effects and titles with occasional keying video effects added. For example this video at approx 2 mins 50 and 5 mins 10 seconds.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T1E5T7xo57c&list=PL577F7AB5E31FC5E9&index=13&feature=plpp_v ideo
Monitor wise I use dual monitor setup. My laptop screen and I link out to an LG M2394 D for widescreen and I sometimes use an old Neovo F-419 for 3 / 4 editing. I won't be using more monitors than 2. If the 580 drops a bit more I'll probably go for that - although I'll have to make sure it's size isn't an issue for the motherboard combo setup. Interestingly there is a thread shown on the forum home page which discusses the 570 vs the 660ti and the opinion was go with the 660ti which surprised me a bit.
Windows 7 professional it is then - I should have known that too - apologises for asking a question already asked.
"Accepted, your correct criticism of the lacking hardware info on the PPBM5 website. That is the overriding reason that for the new site http://ppbm7.com/ we want to use Piriform Speccy .xml results to gather more, more accurate and more detailed hardware info."
No criticism intended Mr Millaard - more an observation and I really look forward to that evolution with PPBM7. I'm assuming the .xml results will use pre populated drop down lists people can select their hardware from - that way you can control and ensure consistent entries - downside being the work required by you to populate the lists in the first place and maintain them.
Thanks again for your help but I'm still unsure a bit about the CPU and video card though.

I am facing error while running Quickpay in Fusion payroll that "The input value Periodicity is missing for element type KGOC_Unpaid_Absence_Amount. Enter a valid input value". Any idea?

I am facing error while running Quickpay in Fusion payroll that "The input value Periodicity is missing for element type KGOC_Unpaid_Absence_Amount. Enter a valid input value". Any idea?

This is most probably because the Periodicity input value has been configured as "Required" and no value has been input for it.
Please enter a value and try to re-run Quick Pay.

Issue while posting using goods issue for delivery type NL

Hello Experts,
I have created an outbound delivery for an intra-company transfer (within same company code) between two plants. The delivery type in NL (replinishment delivery)
When i am trying to post the goods issue from supplying plant, I am getting following error
"Account type K is not defined for document type WL".
Delivery type NL should not be used to issue stock to vendor but I am not issuing it to any external vendor , issuing the stokc only to a receiving plant.
Please help to understand why i am getting this error.
Regards,
Nish.

Hi,
If you are doing an STO Scenario, Check whether you have created the supplying plant as a vendor.
The Vendor Account group should be plants.
Also check whether you have given the plant in the vendor master Purchasing Data - Extras tab in the menu click on add purchasing data & check.
If you haven't assigned this, do the same & create a fresh STO & check.
Hope it will work.
Thanks & Regards,

[svn:bz-trunk] 11030: Tweak the deserialization of ASObjects to treat an empty string for the type of an object as null .

Revision: 11030
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2009-10-20 11:35:02 -0700 (Tue, 20 Oct 2009)
Log Message:
Tweak the deserialization of ASObjects to treat an empty string for the type of an object as null. It appears that there is some logic in the LC remoting code that relies on a non-null class name to always exist. This change reverts to the old behavior of not allowing empty string as a value for the ASObject.namedType.
This should fix bug 2448442 and its duplicates caused by the recent serialization changes.
I don't think this is the perfect fix. Pending further investigation, a better fix would be either:
a. If it's OK to assume that empty string should always mean null for the type of the ASObject, the code that enforces it should be in the setter/getter inside ASObject and not in the deserializer.
b. ASObject doesn't guarantee that a named type exists or is valid. In that sense an empty string is as bad as some random characters that cannot be a valid class name in java, so depending on how disruptive it may be, the fix should be in any logic that uses ASObject.getType().
Modified Paths:
    blazeds/trunk/modules/core/src/flex/messaging/io/amf/AbstractAmfInput.java

Hi Pavan,
"In your payload there is no namespace prefix for the elements under PayloadHeader element."
Yes, you are right - but this message is standard AQ Adapter Header message - it's not defined by me. I just used message which was automatically added to my project when I have defined AQ Adapter.
"In your process is the default namespace is same as namespace value of tns ??"
Do you mean targetNamespace? If yes it's different as it points to process "targetNamespace="http://xmlns.oracle.com/PF_SOA_jws/PF_APPS/APPS_PROCESS" (names of application and process have changed as I try different ways to do that)
ns1 is: xmlns:ns1="http://xmlns.oracle.com/pcbpel/adapter/aq/PF_SOA/PF_APPS/PO_AQ"
"another thing is tns and ns1 should have same values.."
When I create a variable of header type, namespace ns1 is automatically created for it. I set it as property of receive activity. When process is instantiated on the serwer I get the error in which you can see that namespace is tns.
Maybe I'm doing something wrong but I don't see how I could fix this in my process.
You can see that the message I get on the server has nothing in common with the application/project/process names. Is it possible to define such variable?
Regards
Pawel
PS:
In Transformation xsl file, both variables (source and target) has tns namespace for Header and PayloadHeader, and no namespace for subfields.
Edited by: pawel.fidelus on 2010-01-05 02:37

Comparison for clob type

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for