Compatibility with older browsers

I was surprised to see WLP8.1 being marketed as only supported on IE 5.5,
Mozilla 1.2 and NS 7.0. For larger corporations, and customer-facing B2C
websites, it does not make sense to shut out 5-10% of the users just because
they are on older platforms...
Having said that, does anyone know how to get WLP 8.1 to work with Netscape
4.x and IE 4.x? I assume we would need to create a new skin with all
compliant CSS and JS files - has anyone had any success with implementing
something similar? Id appreciate any pointers on how to get started in the
right direction.
Thanks!
Soumit

When I used borders before Swing I created one panel
for each type of border I wanted. Let the panels paint-
method draw lines along the panels borders.
Something like:
public class FrameBorder extends Panel
public void paint(Graphics g)
Dimension d = getSize();
Point p = getLocation();
g.draw3DRect(p.x,p.y,d.width-1,d.height-1,true);
g.draw3DRect(p.x+2,p.y+2,d.width-5,d.height-5,false);
Should not take to much testing to come up with some nice-
looking borders.
/J

Similar Messages

  • CS6 compatibility with older macs (2007-2008), using Mavericks 10.9

    I've heard about compatibility issues with older macs (2007-2008) when trying to run Adobe Creative Suite 6 Master Collection CS6 with Mavericks 10.9. Right now I'm using CS6 on my existing mid-2007, with Mountain Lion, -works great, and I'm worried if I upgrade to Mavericks there may be problems (based on FAQs)
    I do lots of video editing/rendering and am looking into getting another back-up computer to speed up editing time. I'm looking at purchasing an older Apple Mac Pro Tower : 2008 : Xeon 8-core 2.8ghz : 16gb ram : 1TB hd. Will this run Adobe Creative Suite 6 Master Collection CS6 if I'm using Mavericks 10.9? If not, why?
    Does the issue pertain to Mavericks with older macs, or is it CS6 with Mavericks, or what? Thanks!

    Mac 10.9.3 and CS6 https://forums.adobe.com/thread/1480238 may help

  • Files Created in Photoshop CC Not Compatable With Older Versions of Photoshop?

    I have heard that the new Photoshop CC uses a new file system that is not compatible with older versions of Photoshop so you can only edit them in the new Cloud version of Photoshop CC.  Is this true?

    i opened a fine in PSCS 13.1.2.I edited it a bit, converted a layer to a SO and used liquify on that layer.
    I saved it as a tiff. Did not try it as a psd.
    PSCS5 opened the tiff without complaint, including the SO+liquified layer. When i clicked on the liquify at bottom of the SO layer to try to edit it I got the notice "CANNOT FIND THE FILE", or something like that.
    So, I guess pscs5 is already done for.
    vince

  • Test website compatibility with different browsers

    Please tell me how to test my website campatibility with different browsers.
    Thanks,
    Dan

    And you may be doing what I do: Developing on a Macintosh computer running OS X. I do have an emulator for Linux, but not for Windows, so I cannot run IE—except I can.
    Here's how I do it.
    Use Virtual Box. You can set up installations of Windows to run the Three Big Browsers that you need to test on, like I have:
    I can run any of the three virtual machines and test whe I am doing in a Microsoft browser. I no longer support Internet Exploiter 6. My clients are  not interested in China.

  • Visual Studio 2015 compatibility with older versions

    Hi,
    I have already installed Visual Studio 2010 and 2013 on my Windows Server 2012.
    I want to know can I install Visual Studio 2015 on same machine? is there possible any conflict with older version?
    I have many projects in old version and need to open and work on them too.  Thanks.

    Hi,
    I have already installed Visual Studio 2010 and 2013 on my Windows Server 2012.
    I want to know can I install Visual Studio 2015 on same machine? is there possible any conflict with older version?
    I have many projects in old version and need to open and work on them too.  Thanks.
    You should be able to install Visual Studio 2015 alongside 2013 and 2010. However, I'd advise against it until the release version of Visual Studio 2015 becomes available. There may be issues down the road upgrading the preview version of VS 2015 with the final
    retail version.

  • No compatability with older printer hardware/software and no windows media center

    What can I say except that Microsoft is the only company that releases an inferior product after years of having a great product. Windows 8.1 and 8 would be fine if it were compatible with old hardware i.e. printers and had Windows Media Center. This is
    now a very bare bones product. I certainly won't be paying the $129 price tag for Windows Pro 8.1 pack, just to get media center - not when there's so many free alternatives around for that. In future, don't purchase a photo quality printer that costs a fortune.
    Buy a nasty cheap one with inexpensive cartridges, as eventually you won't be able to install the older software for your far superior printer i.e. Epson stylus photo 1270.  Sounds like a collusion with both Microsoft and Printer manufacturers to get
    folk purchasing hardware they don't want or need, while they're older hardware works just fine - it's the new operating systems that don't. No thank you.

    Hi,
    Please understand that Microsoft's partners have shared clear concerns over the costs associated with codec licensing for traditional media playback, especially as Windows 8 enables an unprecedented variety of form factors. Windows has addressed these concerns
    in the past by limiting availability of these experiences to specialized “media” or “premium” editions.  
    That's why the Media center is separated for additional cost.
    For the compatibility thing about older device, you can use the compatible mode to install the related driver on Windows 8 and 8.1 to get it work.
    Making older programs compatible with this version of Windows
    http://windows.microsoft.com/en-gb/windows-8/older-programs-compatible-version-windows
    Kate Li
    TechNet Community Support

  • Mac Pro Compatibility With Older SATA Drives And DVI Connectors

    I soon plan to replace my 5 year old G5 with a new Mac Pro and need two questions answered so that I will know what options i have for the transfer of older data and apps. The Apple web site for the Mac Pro includes the following paragraph which gives me reason for concern:
    Your Mac Pro includes four drive bays, allowing you to configure it with
    up to 8 terabytes of storage using 7200-rpm Serial ATA 3Gb/s drives, up
    to 2 terabytes of storage using high-performance solid-state drives, or
    any combination of each type of drive. Configure each drive bay
    separately.
    Does the phrase "using 7200-rpm Serial ATA 3Gb/s drives" mean that the Mac Pro will ONLY work with 3Gb/s drives or that it performs best with 3Gb/s drives?
    I currently have two internal SATA 250/300 GB Maxtors (Maxtor 7Y250M0 and Maxtor 6B300S0... both are 7200 RPM but I don't know the data transfer speed). Ideally I would get a Mac Pro with a single 1 TB drive, move one or both of these older SATA drives to the new computer, one temporarily and the other permanently in order to transfer data and Apps to the new machine. If this is not possible then the new machine will need to wait until after I get a new larger FW external drive to use as a data transfer medium (I had planned to do that anyhow). I need to do some advance planning for this so I need to know what to expect in advance. I noticed this possible wording ambiguity on Apple's description of the Mac Pro long ago, but now I need to find out the answer for sure. Apple, you need to be more specific with your words.
    Can anybody answer this question for me?
    My second question regards display connectors. Does the standard (no bucks added) display card include a standard DVI connector or only the newer Mini-DVI connectors. I think I see a standard DVI connector in the low res picture of the back of the Mac Pro but am unsure. My 5 year old Apple display bit the dust a year ago and I had to replace it with an HP 2009m display (mumble grumble) which does use a standard DVI connector. A new Apple display is too rich for my blood so I plan to continue using the HP display for now and need to find out if I will need a display adapter to go with it.
    Many thanks to anyone who can answer these questions authoritatively.
    For anyone who asks why I still run 10.3.9 on my G5, I can only answer response speed. New OS versions always act like a lead anchor on a machine with their added overhead and Tiger really does feel like a ball and chain tied to me... it just does not reaspond as fast as I do. I look forward to the speed of a new machine.
    Phil Rogers
    --

    Does the phrase "using 7200-rpm Serial ATA 3Gb/s drives" mean that the Mac Pro will ONLY work with 3Gb/s drives or that it performs best with 3Gb/s drives?
    Any commercial sATA drive will do just fine. 7200 RPM is not a requirement.
    WD "Green" drives have caused user complaints about "long delay until ready" when installed inside a Mac Pro, but are fine for backups.
    You are making the leap from PowerPC to Intel Mac. Eventually, you should re-initialize your old drives to GUID partition table for best responsiveness.
    Migrating your System will not be possible. Use the pre-installed System or Install a new System on a GUID-partitioned drive with the release DVD in the box.
    Migrating your Applications is a Bad Idea. You should plan on re-installing all your third-party Applications from their release discs.

  • Mavericks compatibility with older software

    I'm wondering if
    - MS Office 2008:Mac
    - Adobe CS5 12.0.5
    - Mac Keynote, Numbers, Pages '09
    - Final Cut Pro 5.1.4
    and various other apps running on Snow Leopard 10.6.8 will run with Mavericks?
    (excuse the pun)
    If I need to buy all new software, I may be stuck w/ 10.6.8 - or deep in debt.
    Thanks!

    In all likelihood many will not.   Here is a link to a detailed exploration of what will and what won't work.
    Application compatibility table - RoaringApps

  • JRockit 5 compatibility with older versions of WebLogic?

    Some of our clients are using older versions of WebLogic (I believe 8) but we want to start writing Java 5 code. Does anyone know what minimum version of WebLogic is required to use JRockit 5? Is there a chart online anywhere that shows the WebLogic version and its included JRockit version? I've been searching around and can't find the information!

    Thank you, after digging around through those pages I found part of what I was looking for by clicking on the "List of Supported Operating System Configurations" (and choosing an OS) and it listed the JDK requirements. You are correct in that WebLogic 9 is the first one to mention Java 5.
    However, the other thing I'd like to find out is if WebLogic 8 will still run as normal with a Java 5 VM. When the documents for version 8 were created (or last updated) isn't it possible that Java 5 hadn't been released yet, so they only mention Java 1.4.2?
    Although if Java 5 didn't exist at the time of WebLogic 8, that is probably a good indication that WebLogic 8 could include code (such as usage of "enum") that won't work with Java 5.

  • Motion compatibility with older versions

    I'm using Motion 3 and I want to open the same project with Motion, the first version. I have used no 3D, but when I open with the older Motion, it tells me that the file comes from an older version and it can't be opened... maybe it's because of the use of replicators and behaviours? Or is it impossible to open a file from a newer version of Motion with an old one, no matter how simple it is?

    Between 2 and 2.1 you used to be able to edit the file and simply change the version number, but the file format changed with Motion 3. Thus you can upgrade a file, but never go back...
    Patrick

  • JAXB compatibility with older versions of Java

    Hi,
    Some of the commercial products use Java 1.3.0. We have been thinking of using JAXB for parsing XML's.
    we are not sure if JAXB works with Java 1.3 and if yes then what is the version of JAXB that will work with Java 1.3.0
    Any help in this regard will be greatly appreciated.
    regards,
    Madhav

    Hi,
    Try to follow the below steps to ensure to Fix the issue
    1. Go to see the Extension of the file and there by you will find a Problem there
    2. Now convert the File which is Supported in their formats
    After that you can see the problem once
    If you will find a Remains then you can follow the steps
    1. Make sure to check the File with in the Compatibility mode
    2. If not you can set in to a Compatibility mode by Right click on it
    3. Select the properties and there you will find a " Compatibility " Tab
    Finally after make all changes click on "OK "Best regards,
    Best regards,
    Greta Ge
    TechNet Community Support
    It's recommended to download and install
    Configuration Analyzer Tool (OffCAT), which is developed by Microsoft Support teams. Once the tool is installed, you can run it at any time to scan for hundreds of known issues in Office
    programs.

  • VI backwards compatibility with older run-time Engines

    I currently developed a VI in Labview 8.6.1.  I also created an exe for it so that I can run it on another computer.  However, the other computer has an older version of the Run-Time engine installed and so my program cannot be executed on that computer without upgrading the run-time engine to 8.6.1.  But....that computer also has some programs that run on that version of run-time engine.  I have two options here but I do not know the effects or how to do it.
    1) Install a newer version of the run-time engine (8.6.1) - Will this break the current functionality of the programs already on it?
    2) Is it possible to have my VI run on older versions of the run-time engine?  If so, how do I do that?
    Thank you.
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    As dennis said simply install the new runtime engine. We have machines that have 5 versions of the runtime engine on them and we haven't experienced any problems.
    Mark Yedinak
    "Does anyone know where the love of God goes when the waves turn the minutes to hours?"
    Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald - Gordon Lightfoot

  • Video compatibility with older Acrobat versions

    Hi,
    I am attempting to send a PDF with an embedding video using Acrobat X Pro.
    While it works on my machine, and others with Acrobat 9, the client is struggling to view the video.
    I'm guessing they may not have an updated version -
    a) How far back does Video support go within Acrobat versions?
    b) Can I save a PDF back without losing the video support?
    Thanks,

    Rich Media Annotations (of the type created by Acrobat X when inserting a video, SWF or 3D file) are supported by Acrobat and Adobe Reader 9 and later on desktop platforms (Windows and Mac OS X). They are not supported by earlier versions, nor on mobile devices.
    The ability to create 'legacy' media, which was viewable in earlier desktop versions of Adobe Reader, has been removed from Acrobat X for security reasons.

  • "Pages" compatibility with older versions?

    I received a "Pages" file as an e-mail attachment.  When I tried to open it , I got a message saying that I needed a new version of Pages to open it? Really? I'm running iWork '08 on Snow Leopard.  *** over?

    Pages '08 is unable to read documents saved from Pages '09 with its default format.
    Download the free iWork '09 trial version from :
    http://www.apple.com/iwork/download-trial/
    Install it
    Apply the updates required by your operating system.
    After that you will have a Pages '09 editor during 30 days.
    Use it to open the document and Save it as a Pages '08 one.
    After 30 days the app will become Readers only.
    Yvan KOENIG (VALLAURIS, France) dimanche 19 février 2012
    iMac 21”5, i7, 2.8 GHz, 12 Gbytes, 1 Tbytes, mac OS X 10.6.8 and 10.7.3
    My Box account  is : http://www.box.com/s/00qnssoyeq2xvc22ra4k

  • Which older browsers don't work with iWeb '08?

    I've created a new site in iWeb using a blog page as the default page. My wife couldn't see any of the blog entries using an older Mac and Safari 1.x. So that makes me wonder, what other older browsers are incompatible with iWeb?
    Specifically since so many Windows users are still stuck with IE6, I wonder if these users could see my site at all? If not, I'm going to have to re-create the site using other software.
    Would anyone who has access to IE6 for Windows be willing to check out http://www.gardensofstationpointe.com and let me know if you can see the blog entries listed?
    Thanks.

    Thanks for checking. I actually switched the site to RapidWeaver since I asked the question. I was afraid the original iWeb site wouldn't work with older browsers. I forgot to come back here and make note of it. Thanks.

Maybe you are looking for