Condition Based Measurements

Consider the following scenario: worker measures air flow outside of machine filter and manually creates measurement documents. Upper and lower threshold limits are 5 and -5 units.
What should be the best way to utilize SAP PM to analyze these measurement points and predicts a date when upper OR lower threshold (5 or -5) will be reached, then create a maintenance order for it.
What would be the best tool to utilize? Strategies?
Thank you very much, I am looking forward to your responses and ideas.
Alex

Hi Alex,
Firstly, you need to define the thresholds at which you want some event to occur , Secondly, you need to be able to define the events and Thirdly, you also need to define a model, so you can predict when the threshold may be reached.
In other systems that I've worked with, this was called Condition Monitoring. The system allowed simple models to be constructed to predict when the threshold might be exceeded and multiple thresholds, each with possible different actions to be triggered. So a breaking of a minor limit might trigger an inspection, whilst a trigger of a major limit might trigger a work order, complete with task list to perform some pre-defined action.
In SAP, you have to build such intelligence.
Regards
Andrew
Edited by: Andrew Barnard on Oct 30, 2009 3:27 PM

Similar Messages

  • Condition based maintenance

    Hi Gurus,
    As per my business needs
    Measuring document needs to be updated automatically from proleit (Another system) by IDOC-Pls let me know from our PM end what we have to do?
    Condition based maintenance (As per proleit system measuring document would be updated and determine the condition for automatic notification creation)-Pls suggest how to map the both scenario. if possible pls send the relative documents

    Hi,
         You will have to activate User exit IMRC001  -This gets triggered when measuring document is posted via IK11
    You will have to create a measureing point for the eqpt ..
    In the above user exit you can find sample code which would be helpful
    In config spro ->pm - basic settings -->measuring points & counters  ->Define Measuring point categories, here for a category mention the Tolerance period , if there is any ..
    regards
    giri

  • Query regarding Level Based Measure on Reports

    Hi All,
    I am facing an issue in OBIEE while using aggregate measures.
    Scenario
    My Report has the following columns. There is security applied on the report ie an Employee who logs in gets to see only his/her data.
    1) Employee
    2) Month
    3) Monthly Sales
    4) Org Sales(Aggregate Sales at Organization Level)
    My Issue is that even when an Employee does not have any Monthly Sales for a Month (no entry for the employee in the dimension table)  it displays results for Org Sales. So I have a report that looks like given below.
    Please note - There is no entry for this employee in the Dimension table for this month.
    Employee
    Month 
    Monthly Sales 
    Org Sales
    12000
    I do not want the report to display any value when there is no monthly Sales for the Employee. From the back end, I can see that there are 2 separate queries generated for this report. 1 for the fetching the Monthly Sales for the Employee and 1 for fetching the Org Sales. If I apply a condition saying Employee IS NOT NULL, it gets applied on the first query.
    Is there some workaround to make sure that the report does not come up or show some message when Employee data is not returned by the first query
    Thanks
    X

    hi Devarasu,
    Thanks mate.
    I know how level based measure works.
    But in my case The Hierarchy is bit different The UDA is part of Product hierarchy but its not the Child of Subdivision,
    I think problem is occurring because of that only but i am not sure
    anyone have any idea about this kind of hierarchy and level based measures?
    Thanks

  • Condition based mtc

    Pm gurus
    Please bring ur thoughrs for my process req.
    we need to carry the Condition based mtc order for objects. Ex: In our Centrifugal fans we are measuring the vibration suppose while measurement it reaches 8 mm. the orders has to create by the system .
    I know some what the process is below
    1. Charector creation
    2. Meas. Pt
    3. Meas. Plan
    But in above charector the 8 mm that value where to enter ?
    Meas pt means over estimate reading is reqd? overflow reading is reqd?
    How the system will give order need to assign valuation code ?
    pls give step by step process
    iam expecting ur valuable reply
    Regards
    Thenna

    Hi Thenna........
    Condition based maintenance means Maintenance to be planned when a particular measurable value goes out of Limit as in your case for Centrifugal Fans. You have to create a Measuring point in respect of this equipment i.e. Centrifugal fan. Do not click on counter as due to this you are getting Counterflow reading. In Measuring Point screen, you can enter your target value & then on application toolbar, click on additional data, here you can define upper & lower limits, so that whenever value goes out of limit, system will warn you. For Measuring Point you need to know these.......
    <b>Characteristics with Unit - Tcode - CT04
    Measuring Point - IK01
    Measuring Document - IK11
    Maintenance Plan - IP41/42/43</b>
    I hope this will definetely help.......for further query, just revert back.
    Regards......

  • Condition Based Maintenance Plans

    Dear All,
    My client has the requirement of condition based maintenance plans without interfacing etc. An example is described below:
    Compressor bearing has temperature limits of 70 deg C and 90 deg C. If measurement document reading is recorded outside the range specified here a maintenance call / maintenance order should be triggered.
    Please give an example or process for the above dsicussed condition based maintenance plan upto two or three calls.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Saif Ali Momin

    Hi,
    As such there is no functionality directly. You can use the following user exits and can develop your on logic to trigger notification in case measured values are out of tolerance values.
    IMRC0003 Menu exit - measurement document
    As I remember there is sample code available for ythe same. You can check through SMOD transaction.

  • Condition based maintenance plan

    Dear Experts,
    Can anybody clarify me about the condition based maintenance plan?
    How the plan is created and measuring points and measuring documents are controlled?
    My requirement is as follow:
    I have one equipment, for that equipment I have created a measuring point (Temp) with counter. And the engineer enters the measuring document for that equipment.
    Here when the measuring reading reaches certain level, say Temp reaches more that 80 Degree C, i.e., a measuring document is entered for the measuring point with a reading of 82 Degree C, system should generate a maintenance order for that equipment?
    How the above scenario is addressed in SAP?
    Please help me out.
    Thanks in Advance,
    Regards.

    Hi all,
    Thanks for your replies.
    PS: Ramesh,
    The operator maintains the log sheet of the equipments out side SAP, since he doesn't have the access to the SAP system. All the details are entered by Maintenance Engineer or Supervisor. The same log sheet details are entered by them in the system.
    Will you please clarify me on thing:
    *need to specify the min & max level in your measurement point at which u want to get call*
    how can we specify the min & max levels in measuring point? Is it possible through customer exit only? Because I did not able to find those filed in the measuring point master data.
    Regards..

  • How to create a condition based on a select that retrieve dynamically a LOV

    Hi all, I need to create a condition based on a select that retrieve dynamically a LOV.
    So, the condition have to be:
    inventory_item_id NOT IN (SELECT inventory_item_id FROM apps.mtl_system_items_kfv WHERE concatenated_segments = 'GENERAL_FAULTS_IPTV')
    I need to create a LOV based on this select without making any join with the folder which contains the field inventory_item_id, because otherwise I have the contradiction:
    and o124757.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID = o118741.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID -- join between the main custom folder (o118741) and the LOV custom folder (o124757)
    and o118741.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID NOT IN (o124757.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID) -- condition
    These two condition together don't show any data, obviously....This means also, that I can't use a calculated field, because if I want to see this field, I have to create a join, another time, with the main custom folder.
    I tried to create a LOV on the Administrator, but when I create the condition I have to check manually the values....and if in the future this LOV will increase I need every time to re-check all the values.....instead I need that the inventory_item_id have to be NOT IN dinamically in the list of values retrieved by the select.
    Anybody has inplemented something similar ??
    Thanks in advance
    Alex

    Hi alex,
    SELECT incidents.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID,
    pcodes.PROBLEM_NAME
    FROM apps.cs_incidents_all_b incidents,apps.jtf_rs_problem_codes_v pcodes
    WHERE incidents.category_id IN (SELECT category_id
    FROM mtl_categories_kfv
    WHERE concatenated_segments = 'IPTV')
    AND incidents.PROBLEM_CODE = pcodes.PROBLEM_CODE
    where incidents.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID NOT IN SELECT inventory_item_id
    FROM apps.mtl_system_items_kfv
    WHERE concatenated_segments = 'GENERAL_FAULTS_IPTV'
    You want to add this condition to the first query it holds good for this scenerio.All the items which are NOT IN will be retrieved.Here you are selecting other than "General_faults_iptv"
    But again your trying to select in the second query where you want "General_faults_iptv"
    SELECT inventory_item_id
    FROM apps.mtl_system_items_kfv
    WHERE concatenated_segments = 'GENERAL_FAULTS_IPTV'
    If you carefully go through what your doing,you will understand.In the above explantion ,there will be no records generated.First query your saying NOT IN and again your saying for the same IN,how will records retrieve its meaningless.
    I dont know what you want to get from second query.I would suggest you to do is dont use the second query and just use the first query and you will get.Here is the query and this will give you result.
    SELECT incidents.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID,
    pcodes.PROBLEM_NAME
    FROM apps.cs_incidents_all_b incidents,apps.jtf_rs_problem_codes_v pcodes
    WHERE incidents.category_id IN (SELECT category_id
    FROM mtl_categories_kfv
    WHERE concatenated_segments = 'IPTV')
    AND incidents.PROBLEM_CODE = pcodes.PROBLEM_CODE
    AND incidents.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID NOT IN SELECT inventory_item_id
    FROM apps.mtl_system_items_kfv
    WHERE concatenated_segments = 'GENERAL_FAULTS_IPTV'
    Regards,
    Kranthi.

  • Dist. of Header Condition based on the material Value

    Hi All,
    I have one query regarding the header Condition.i have selected the Calculation type as B - fixed amount  (mandatory) for a particular Condition type and also selected the header and Item condition indicator.Now if the material have more than one line item then the system distributes this condition based on the quantities in PO.
    My client requirement is that they want to have a header condition as we are using now. But they want to distribute this header condition according to the material values for each line items in a PO. please Mention that this condition is a fixed value (mandatory).
    So, how can we make a Fixed Value (Calculation type) for a header condition to be distributed among the line items based on the base Value?
    Please revert back asap.
    Sure, points will be awarded for the same.

    as explained earlier ,
    system is distributes the header amount on the basic of value calculated by Basic X qty
    e.g.
    header value =100
    two line item
    1 is with Rs 4/- and qty is 10
    2 is with Rs 10/- and qty is 15
    so distribution is
    Rs 21.05/-  for 1st item
    and
    Rs 78.94/- for 2ed item
    regards,
    sujit

  • Level Based Measures

    Hi Experts,
    please clarify my doubts .
    1. I created 3 level based measures. Year level Revenue, Quarter level Revenue and Month level revenue. And I do have Revenue column which is not at any level.
    Report:
    I put "Date" , "Year based Revenue" , "Quarter based Revenue" and "Month based Revenue" in a report.
    Everything works fine.
    But when i add ' Revenue' Column (not specific to any level) to this report, all values of level based measures changes. Why does this happen. And how to overcome this?
    2. Also when i add columns from other dimensions(Like ProductName) , values of all these level based measures in previous report changes.
    My questioin is why do these fields change their values when someone else comes into picture.(Though they are called level based measures !)
    Is there any way to hold a particular value in a field no matter which ever field comes in a report?
    Thanks in Advance
    Jaan

    Hi Pramod,
    It's customary to award points to Nico for helping you with your question. Could you also set the thread to Answered so other users can take advantage of your work in case they have the same problem?
    Thanks!
    -Joe

  • Level Based Measure and a column based on that

    Hello All,
    I need suggestions to implement the following requirement.
    1. No of orders stored in a fact table at day level
    2. No. of orders at month level should be calculated
    3. Depending on the count, each month would be assigned to a bucket.
    0-10 orders -> B1
    11-100 orders -> B2
    > 100 orders -> B3
    What I did in RPD
    1. fact joined to time dimension
    2. created a logical column: ORDER_COUNT: count(distinct order_number) iand set the level = month
    3. created a logical column: BUCKET: using the output of above logical column and CASE statement to implement the bucket rule.
    Now, when I run a report like this:
    Year; ORDER_COUNT; BUCKET
    Returns me 12 rows. Understood because ORDER_COUNT is a month level measure
    E.g.
    2011 5 B1
    2011 5 B1
    2011 15 B2
    2011 15 B2
    2011 5 B1
    2011 5 B1
    2011 15 B2
    2011 15 B2
    2011 5 B1
    2011 5 B1
    2011 15 B2
    2011 15 B2
    But as soon as I pull the BUCKET column as column heading in pivot table, it returns me only the 1st month row and changes the "BUCKET" value to B3.
    Looks like, it recalculates the bucket and sums up all 12 months orders and then applies the bucket rule.
    Like this -
    B3
    2011 5
    My expectation was something like this
    B1 B2 B3
    2011 30 90 0
    where 30 is the sum of the order_counts of all B1 months, <m>
    Ques:
    1. Is there a way I can avoid the recalculation of bucket information when the granularity/dimensionality changes in the report
    2. I read in the below link that if the grain of the report > grain of the level-based-measure then the output of the report is "not-deterministic"
    Am I hitting that scenario?
    [http://gerardnico.com/wiki/dat/obiee/measure_level_based]
    Any suggestion would be highly appreciated.
    I am using 11.1.1.6.2 version.
    Thanks & Regards
    Monika

    Hi ,
    If I understand your requirement  correctly , then you need currency Conversion.
    you can refer this links.
    http://consultingblogs.emc.com/christianwade/archive/2006/08/24/Currency-Conversion-in-Analysis-Services-2005.aspx
    http://www.ssas-info.com/analysis-services-faq/27-mdx/244-how-change-currency-symbol-based-on-selected-currency-dimension-member
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/18672.currency-conversion-in-ssas-2012-multidimensional-tabular.aspx
    May I know , You Require all this using MDX and SSRS Parameter ?
    Thanks

  • Level based measure and AGO function

    Hi,
    I've a TIME fact table with a single dimension (TIME_DIM) and a single measure (WORK_DAY).
    WORK_DAY is 1 if the day is a working day, otherwise it is 0.
    This way I can get the number of working days by month, quarter and year.
    (TIME is a logical fact table. WORK_DAY is phsical stored inside the physical TIME_DIM).
    To have WORK_DAY work correctly when used with others fact tables, I've defined it as a level based measure, where all the dimensions are set to the "total" level, apart TIME_DIM.
    So far so good.
    Then I created a new calculated measure WORK_DAY_PREVIOUS_YEAR.
    I used the AGO function this way: AGO (TIME.WORK_DAY, TIME_HIERARCHY.YEAR, 1)
    No complains by OBIEE, but this column always returns 1...
    I've no trouble using level based measures.
    I've no trouble using AGO.
    But if I mix them together they no longer work.
    Do you experience this issue? Any workaround?
    I'm using OBIEE 11.1.1.5
    Regards,
    Corraod

    What is the month level key column functionality in your time dimension?
    it should be in format of yyyymm but not in just mm ..

  • Condition Based Downpayment

    Dear All,
    We are using ECC 6.0  EHP5.0  with single instance worldwide, one controlling area, one global chart of account and one fiscal year for all company codes in SAP and for each company code we have 1:1 mapping to sales organization.
    We are in process of implementing  "Condition based Down payment" with conjunction with a  billing Plan but the billing plans is not including any down payment items .
    We followed the SAP best practices guide to setup the condition types and pricing procedure per the guide
    http://help.sap.com/bp_retail603/BBLibrary/Documentation/732_BB_ConfigGuide_EN_US.doc
    We followed the following process:
    1.  Created a regular Sales order with 2 items with a total value of say 5,000 GBP and entered a value for condition AZWA in the sales order header for 1,000 GBP
    2.  Entered a down payment for that amount (1,000 GBP) using t-code (F-29). In F-29  we entered the special G/L indicator = A (downpayment) and tried to reference the sales order number.  However, the system gave error message u201CMessage no. V1125 - Enter the item numberu201D so we were forced to enter the payment at the line item level.
    3.  Created the invoice for this item and received the expected value in the AZWB pricing condition but the accounting document did NOT settle the down-payment amount per the value in AZWB.
    We have the following questions:
    1.   How can we make the F-29 payment using only the sales order number (i.e. at the header levelu2026without the line item)?   The SAP Help implies that this is possible. (http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_05/helpdata/EN/dd/560e4b545a11d1a7020000e829fd11/frameset.htm)  in the Down Payment Processing (Basis: Document Condition) section under u2018Incoming Paymentsu2019 it says u2018The system summarily posts the payment to the sales order number, not item-specificallyu2019.  It then also says u2018Aside from this it is possible to post the incoming payment directly in the financial accounting (transaction F-29). The important thing here is that the financial accounting item contains a reference to the sales order number. It is also possible to post item-specific down payments.u2019
    2.  During Final Billing, how and we get the accounting document to settle the down-payment amount per the value in condition type AZWB.  In the billing-plan process, the final billing settles the downpayment.  We want the condition based final billing to act in a similar way and do not want to have to perform a manual downpayment settlement separately (via F-39). 
    Thank you in advance,
    Vicki

    Hi,
    In the billing plan Billing rule should be maintained as "4" or "5" which indicates that line is down payment. Assign down payment request for this Billing plan item.
    What is the billing document type you have used for the invoicing?
    Check if  Billing category is  "P = Down payment request"
    When a down payment request is created it will process only dowm payments.
    In F-29 system will process only those docuements which are identified as Down payment request.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Sharan

  • Create a condition based on a select

    Hi, I have the necessity to create a condition, inside a report, based on a select, for example (when I build a condition):
    Item: "Item (RUO)".Description
    Condition: IN
    Values: select item_description from ISUPP_LOV_RUO_SLA_PRODUCTS_V -> 3 values
    How can I dynamically pass these 3 values to the condition, without using hard coded strings as 'A','B','C' ??
    Thanks
    Alessandro

    Hi,
    If you are using Discoverer Desktop then you can create a condition based on a subquery. You create worksheet that returns those 3 rows then create the condition where then item is in the first worksheet.
    If you are Discoverer Plus then you will have to join the folders in the EUL. So you create a folder for ISUPP_LOV_RUO_SLA_PRODUCTS_V and join it to the report folder using "Item (RUO)".Description = ISUPP_LOV_RUO_SLA_PRODUCTS_V.item_description .
    Rod West

  • Condition Based Interface Determination in ICO (AAE) - PI 7.1 EHP1

    Hi Friends,
    We have PI 7.1 EHP1 - SP 04.
    In our scenario, we have 1 outbound interface and 2 inbound interface. Based on condition, it needs to select the first inbound interface or second inbound interface.
    In the normal configuration, we are able to select. (By click + icon and add condition in the Receiver Interfaces in Interface Determination Step)
    When we create configuration using ICO (Integrated Configuration), there is no option in "Receiver Interfaces" Tab to add two inbound interfaces with condition.
    Could you please clarify how do we do this in ICO?
    Kind regards,
    Jegathees P.

    IMHO, condition based interface determination is not possible in ICO.
    Use Multiple inbound service interfaces... You can handle in design level .. ESR level. 
    Check the Abhishek's blog... This  might be helpful.
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/90dcc6f4-0829-2d10-b0b2-c892473f1571?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
    Note: Since in your case you need two receiver agreements, you cannot handle through ICO. The above link might be helpful to do multimapping without BPM.
    Edited by: Baskar Gopal on Apr 26, 2011 9:53 AM

  • Issue with Level-based measure at Year level

    Hello everyone,
    I am facing weird issue while using OBIEE 11g level-based measure at the Year level. I am creating a trend analysis report that are displaying Expense Accounts dimension with 6 levels and 2 measures: Expense YTD, and Expense Full Year measures
    The report has multiple rows with value "Others" in the 3rd level of the account dimension (Account Level 3) yet, they all have different IDs and associated with different parents (different Account Level 2 values)...
    When i displaying the Expense YTD measure only results are fine and everything is perfect, when selecting Expense Full Year measure, only the first occurrence of the value "Others" in 3rd level column is displayed and non of the remaining records appears...
    What makes my life worse is that i can't even see the log file of this query because an error occurs when trying to view the session log i.e. "No log file found"
    Please help, i am about to start the UAT phase of the current project and i am running out of time..
    Thanks
    Mohamed Adel

    Hi,
    Are you using presentation hierarchy?
    Refer below if same is followed-
    http://gerardnico.com/wiki/dat/obiee/hierarchy_level_based
    Hope this helped/ answered.
    Regards
    MuRam

Maybe you are looking for

  • Adding new column to production database

    I have to add a new timestamp column, that defaults to the current date/time, to an existing production database. The table is large - 150M records. I am trying to understand the ramifications of adding a new column to a table this large that gets hi

  • Album cover in Opus file

    Hello, As Firefox supports Opus files I use this format for my music. The thing is that embedded cover is not supported properly, in such case the music player will simply not show the file (like an unsupported type). Here is the command line used: o

  • Master Detail between two updatable tables ( advance tables)

    Hi, I have two advanced table regions, and both are updatable. They have Master detail relationship , and on clicking on the select button in the Master region, the updatable child region ( with generally more than one records), is displayed. The pro

  • N95 Crashes

    Hi, Ive got a problem with my Nokia 95 with 3. Model number N95-1. Original N95 running software 12.0.013. The problem started as soon as i recieved it from 3 whenever i try and access any big apps mainly GPS,Internet or try and go in 3-D view the ph

  • My iPhoto won't open.

    The iphoto app crashes immediately and produces an error report. It happened the first time when I was in the middle of downloading photos from my camera. Any quick fixes?