Condition - filter at lower level than displayed

I have the following requirement to display data in a query. For the purpose of this example, the relevant characteristic are Plant and Delivery. The KFs are Volume & Revenue. I want to display by Plant the total volume and revenue without displaying delivery, but only where the total volume on the delivery is > 0. If I look at the data at the delivery level I would see the following.
Plant Deliv    Vol   Rev
A      1        100   50
A      2        200   75
A      3          0   25
When I run my query, I want to see the following. Delivery 3 is ignored.
Plant   Vol   Rev
A       200   125
I've played with conditions but can't make it work. any ideas?

Have you looked at using the precalculated value set or the resultset query? This will run the lower level query and then filter on the higher level query by the lower level values.
<a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/2c/78a03c1178ad2ce10000000a114084/content.htm">http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/2c/78a03c1178ad2ce10000000a114084/content.htm</a>
Thanks,
Jeff

Similar Messages

Delivery cost condition type in PO coming as display mode

Hi Experts,
In my Purchase order having delivery cost condition types, for ex freight. For this PO i have done Goods receipt. PO all the delivery costs are showing in display mode. i have reversed the Good receipt.Again also all the delivery costs are showing grey mode in PO.
I want to make as editable for this PO after reversal of GR. Kindly do the nedful.

HI makarand ,
the condition type you have created is this assigend in Item Level or Header level. Plz check this in Header and item Conditions Tab. If you can assigned Delivery cost condition type in item level than it will changed by item level itself.
In Header Level it displays in Display Mode.
Vraj

How to create @prompt filter at universe level for my Webi reports

Dear all,
I am using BO XI 3.1 SP3 with SAP BW 7.0.
I have created an open[big] query based on a multiprovider for my OLAP universe.
OBJECTIVE: to create LOV prompts for Calender year, for my webi reports, which takes 2010 as input then offsets the input year and then shows Gross sales for the prompt year [2010], 2009 & 2008.
ISSUE: if 2010 is selected in webi prompt filter, then it doesn't display any data for any other year, lets say gross sales for 2009.
ALTERNATIVE: i tried to create a prompt filter in the universe with this syntax,
<FILTER KEY="@Select(Calendar year\Calendar year).[TECH_NAME]"><CONDITION OPERATORCONDITION="InList"><CONSTANT TECH_NAME="@Prompt('Enter year','N',,Mono,Free,Not_Persistent)"/></CONDITION></FILTER>
it worked fine. but i also want to create a measure or dimension which subtracts 1 from the above filter and return a result with a previous year.
e.g
PROMPT: 2010
PROMPT-1: 2009
Universe structure
[TIME] class
[Calender year] class
 [Calender year] dimension ( type:string)
Please guide me with correct procedure and syntax.

masood44 ,
I think you should just prompt for year and capture and use the selection at the webi report level.
say you have calendar year(convert it into numeric) prompt at webi level. say user selects 2010 capture it in a variable var1:userresponse('enter year'). then create a variABLE (var2) with formula :
if(isPromptAnswered('enter year')='yes';([year] where year inlist(var1;var1-1;var1-2);null)
build your report with var2 and gross income
Thanks,
Karthik
Edited by: kbharadwaj79 on Jun 2, 2011 5:34 PM

Photoshop Elements 11 Organizer: Full screen view of lower quality than with PSE 10 and before?!

Upgrading from PSE 10 to 11, I noticed that when I watch my images with the organizer in PSE 11 in full screen view mode (F11), while the images load faster, they are shown in a lower quality than in PSE 10 or any other version of PSE that I owned before. In PSE 11, after the initial viewing in full screen (in the "fit screen" mode), when I click with the mouse on an image to display the "100%" view, there is a delay and the program says "Loading...", after which the 100% view in the full screen mode appears. When I then click another time with the mouse on the image to get back to "fit screen" mode, I get an image of better quality than during the initial view!
So it seems like the program first gives a faster, but lower quality view of the image in full screen mode, and only after the user requests a 100% view, it actually loads the image with full detail, which is then preserved when going back to the "fit screen" view. This is a serious issue for me, because I also use PSE organizer to present my pictures to other people, and I don't want to show them some lower quality versions of my images, but the full quality ones, without having to first choose "100% view" and then go back to "fit screen".
How can I make the PSE 11 organizer give me a full-quality full screen image right away, as this used to be the case in PSE10 and before?
(I have both versions, PSE 11 and PSE 10, now on the same computer and tested this to confirm that the PSE 11 initial full screen view is of lower quality than the PSE 10 one. Also in PSE 10, there is practically no delay for displaying the "100%" view afterwards, indicating that the image was loaded with full detail right away.)

- Update:
* Adobe's senior support level has replied to me about this issue as follows:
"Thank you for contacting Adobe.
When you press the F11 button, Organizer 11 uses the Bicubic
interpolation mainly because it is less processor intensive compared to
Bicubic Sharper, and it helps to create the preview on the fly, rather
than based on the thumbnail cache.
When you zoom out from the 100% view, Elements Organizer uses Bicubic
Sharper. This is because Bicubic Sharper is used for image reduction, so
if the 100% view is larger than the available screen space, it will need
to shrink. The Bicubic Sharper images may look more crisp however, Like
any sharpening algorithm, Bicubic Sharper introduces halos and
edge-enhancement artifacts. Those halos are typically slight, but any
further sharpening (which you'll need when preparing an image for print,
for example) will exaggerate them.This is expected behavior. The
Organizer isn't great for determining exact quality, I recommend you to
use Elements Editor for this purpose.
Thank you,
Bobby Johnson,
Adobe Technical Support."
* My reply on this to Adobe is:
"Hello Bobby,
thank you for your reply. Now at least we are talking about the same thing.
Why I am wondering about the choice to use the "Bicubic" algorithm when pressing F11 in PSE 11 is that all previous versions of PSE that I owned (which spans from PSE 6 to PSE 10) did use the "Bicubic Sharper" algorithm right away when pressing F11. So apparently Adobe didn't worry about processor intensity of this algorithm then, and computers are getting all the time more powerful.
It is true that in some situations, the "Bicubic Sharper" algorithm may introduce halos and edge-enhancement artifacts, as you write. On the other hand, especially on smaller resolution screens, the results of the "Bicubic Sharper" algorithm may look more crisp and lively, while the ones of the "Bicubic" algorithm may look more flat and lack fine detail. This is not only my personal opinion, but as I have brought up this topic in several forums, I can see that I am not alone here.
So assuming that the question about preferring "Bicubic Sharper" or "Bicubic" as a default algorithm when pressing F11 is partly a matter of taste, and partly a matter of the hardware the user has available, why can Abobe not give the user an option to choose which one he/she would prefer? For instance, F11 gives full screen view with "Bicubic" applied, and CTRL+F11 with "Bicubic sharper"? Or make this an option in the preferences?
As I am using the PSE organizer also to present pictures to other people (and I know many people who use it that way too), I would like to show them my pictures as sharp and detail-rich as possible. Therefore, I would highly appreciate an option as described above to be implemented in the PSE 11 organizer via an update. It should be fairly easy from a programming point of view, since both algorithms are already contained in the program anyway."
* If you support this suggestion of mine as stated above, please also contact Adobe accordingly! The more support requests they get for this, the more likely it is that they will implement this update! You may mention my case number 0184046323 for reference.

Nodes with Only One Lower-Level Node = Hide

Hi everyone
Have anyone present this situation:
Iu2019ve a quey to report inventory aging. It has two hierarchies to show data. In Rows I have Major Markets and in Columns a date hierarchy to show aging Ex: from 0 to 8 months, 9+ and 13+. Of course here I have also value and volume.
Query reports all values for all major markets fine. When I filter one major market, letu2019s say France also brings detailed figures but when I add any drill down in rows all values goes to cero (0).
Te estrange is that if you swap drill down order with major markets or drill down by columns with the same characteristic figures come out again as usual.
I know this sounds like a SAP note but I have not been able to find it either.
Thanks a lot for your help, and of course points will be assignedu2026..
Ps. Important, this happen when option u201CNodes with Only One Lower-Level Node = Hideu201D (this is selected on purpose because there are some repeated nodes in major market hierarchy Ex. France u2013 France and if there is just one value under first node then means that only display of last one is necessary to avoid repeated values).

Solution we found is to remove flag "Do not display leaves for inner-nodes in the query", directly on the hierarchy.
Thanks

Why is color management enabled (all, not just tagged) firefox showing images with higher black level than other color managed programs?

Using Win 7 and spyder calibrated (lut based) display. image editing programs show lower black level than firefox. Firefox images are too light.

Ehkä ensimmäisenä asiana on että sen saa pois päältä: https://addons.mozilla.org/fi/firefox/addon/color-management/
Sen jälkeen tämä näyttäisi olevan sama ongelma kuin täällä: http://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3569891
Tämä näyttäisi olevan ongelma, jota on vaikea toisintaa (siis kenen tahansa, jolla kalibrointi toimii). Vai olenko väärässä? Jos ongelmaa ei pysty toisintamaan, sitä ei ikävä kyllä ole myöskään mahdollista ratkaista.

Why does Photoshop Elements 11 open a file in a lower resolution than I saved it in?

Why does Photoshop Elements 11 open files in a lower resolution than I saved them?

The only meaningful figures for 'resolution' with a digital image are the pixel dimensions. They are not changed by saving.
The ppi (pixel per inch) information is not a property of the image, just like the dimensions of your prints : it's your choice when you want do display or print your images. The detail level of your image is dependent on the pixel size.

In sales order for the condition type MWST, **Tax code** is displaying wron

Hi
In sales order for the condition type MWST, *Tax code* is displaying wrongly at header level i.e. FF instead of AO (under account determination tab)
AO tax is 0% but for FF it is 19%
I have checked with the Access sequence it is picking access 08 correctly according to this it should show AO in tax code field for MWST but it is not so..
There is a manual change for tax classification for material master in va02 initially it was blank now it is changed to ' 0 ' is any way influencing....?
Even if I consider material tax classification and customer tax code should not be FF because tax code FF is not maintained for the combination of access sequences for condition type MWST
Please help me.
Rajendra Prasad

Dear Rajendra,
There is a manual change for tax classification for material master in va02 initially it was blank now it is changed to ' 0 ' is any way influencing....?
Definitely material Tax classification will influence to determine the Tax code.
-->So Make sure that customer and material master having proper tax classification indicator.
-->Have you Update the price after changing the tax classification in the sales order.by going to item dat -->condition tab then click on Update push button bottom of the conditions screen.
-->Once again the check the condition record maintanence also for your MWST access sequence.
I hope this will help you,
Regards,
Murali.

Issue in determining Low level codes

Hi Gurus,
We are having an issue running heuristics when running along with Temporary low level codes. We are in SCM 7.0 environment.
The SNP Heuristics jobs are failing with this message "Low-level code
not available for product XXXXXXX at location XXXX
Job cancelled after system exception ERROR_MESSAGE"
Also, the message in the job log for the product in was flagged for deletion and I am not too sure why is this being picked up for processing and then failing?
I tried using SDP relevance as '1' for the product flagged for deletion for testing purposes and then the program is not considering this SKU, but stopping at another SKU and also that SKU is flagged for deletion. But the flip side of using SDP relevance is that that setting is at global level andmay have issues where the SKU is active.
I have couple questions:
1) Is there a way for the program to skip the code which has an error and move forward instead of failing the job? and provide a spool with error codes.Also, to provide the LLC number for all the correct SKU's instead of failing at that point and not generating the LLC's?
2) Why is the program also considering the codes which are flagged for deletion which should not be the case?
Also, I tried another way of maintaining the codes in thevariant which are not flagged for deletion and tried running heuristics in the background but failed at a point and it gave a message stating Low-level code not available for product XXXXXXX at location XXXX, Job cancelled after system exception ERROR_MESSAGE
But the product which was displayed in the job log is an active SKU. I am not too sure why the job failed with this error?
I tried running that individual SKU in the background including the temporary determination of LLC, it was successful. I am not too sure why it failed when it was a part of selection?
Any suggestions, would really help us a lot.
Thanks and regards,
Murali

Hi Datta - Thanks for the replies. I was able to have a workaround by using selection profiles excluding the Procurement type 'P' and it worked.
At our client, whenever a product is made 'non-X0' in ECC, procurement type is set to 'P' and by excluding that piece in the variant I was able to continue with my processing.
But still, don't you think the products which are flagged for deletion shouldn't be picked up heuristics?
Thanks and regards,
Murali

Premiere Pro CS6 - A low level exception has occurred in ImporterMPEG

Hi Adobe Community,
I'm having a bit of an issue with the ImporterMPEG.prm plugin for Premiere Pro CS6 that's causing playback and exporting issues.
Computer Specs: Win7 PC, NVIDIA GeForce 6150SE nForce 430 graphics card
Description: After playing back video for a while, Premiere will eventually start repeatedly reporting "A low level exception has occurred in ImporterMPEG". The preview player will be completely frozen, and I'll be unable to export. The exporting will fail with a generic "Unexpected error" message.
This issue has only started a week ago. Until now, I've been able to use Premiere Pro CS6 with no issues. If possible, I'd like to avoid upgrading to CC 2014, because the CS6 version was working fine before.
So far, I've tried a few things:
• Deactivating and reactivating (which, by the way, apparently doesn't help subscription users like me, per my recent chat with Adobe support on this issue)
• Uninstall and reinstall (I didn't know about the CC Cleaner tool at the time, so I haven't tried a clean uninstall yet)
• Change the Preview File Format in Sequence Settings (from I-Frame Only MPEG which had worked since I installed the software over a year ago to Microsoft AVI)
• Crying silently to myself (this did not help, the computer is cold and cruel)
• Clearing out the media cache (which I'd never done before and let it get up to ~75GB without me noticing)
• Moving the plugin from its location in Program Files, hoping that maybe Premiere Pro would notice it was missing and to try to find a new fresh one (it didn't work)
So far, only the Preview File Format change seemed to bring relief, but the bad behavior came back after about a week.
I'm thinking maybe the ImporterMPEG.prm plugin got corrupted somehow? The one notable thing I can remember with the computer in the last few weeks was a power event that shut down my computer unexpectedly. I think I had Premiere Pro open at the time.
If it's relevant, I mostly work with .AVI, .MP4, and .TS files in my projects, all varying resolutions and FPS. I'm usually working with about 1GB of files in a project, very rarely more than 2GB.
Has anyone else had this issue? Or, even better, has anyone else resolved this issue?
Thanks!

But really, the real solution for me was to not update Premiere Pro CS6 after a reinstall. The most recent updates just do not like my computer, I guess.
Figured I should post this solution here in case anyone in the future has this problem. (relevant: xkcd: Wisdom of the Ancients)
-Sam

Need help in copying Invoice date to lower level item in Sales order report

Hello Experts,
I am debugging into one Sales order report.I need little bit help.The report is displaying Invoice Date for
Sales order Billing documents for Higher item in Bill of Material Structures.But as per user requirement,
I am supposed to show the Invoice date for lower level items also.The field for Higher level item is 'UEPOS'.
I want to copy the Invoice date for Higher level item to lower level item. Can you please guide me in the logic?
Thanking you in anticipation.
Best Regards,
Harish

Hi BreakPoint,
Thanks for the information.
I have applied the same way but it is showing only lower line items now.
Invoice dates for Higher level items are not there.
I am pasting the code here which I have applied.
Then you can give me more guidence.
This is to be done only for 'ZREP' sales orders.
if w_vbak-auart EQ 'ZREP' and w_vbak-uepos is not INITIAL.
                      read table t_final into w_final_ZREP with key vbeln = w_vbak-vbeln
                                                                    posnr = w_vbak-uepos.
                         w_final-erdat_i = w_final_ZREP-erdat_i.
                         else.
                if w_vbak-auart EQ 'ZREP' and w_vbak-uepos is INITIAL.
                  w_final-erdat_i = w_invdate.
                endif.
                endif.
Can you please sugest me changes here?
Best Regards,
Harish
Edited by: joshihaa on Jul 13, 2010 6:22 PM

When i try to create Filter on aggregation level the system gives me error

Hi BI Guru's,
I am facing a problem BI - IP .
When i try to create Filter on aggregation level the system gives me follwoing error.
"Authorization check of component failed"
"You do not have authorisation for Add or Create".
"Could not create Filter "
Please let me know if have any solution for this
Thanks & Regards,
Nilesh Labde

Here are list of auth objects for BI IP
S_RS_ALVL --> aggregation levels
S_RS_PLSE -->planning functions
S_RS_PLSQ-->planning sequences
S_RS_PLST-->planning function types
S_RS_PLENQ-->maintain and display lock settings
Authorization templates for Integrated planning are
S_RS_PL_ADMIN
S_RS_PL_PLANNER
S_RS_PL_PLANMOD_D----
> Planning modeler(Dev System)
A portal role is required to use the planning modeler.

Low Level SSL read is not working !

Hi,
I can readLine() from a buffered SSL socket without any problems.
But I can't get the last line because the last line does not contain any <CR> or <LF>.
So, when I try to do a low level read from a raw SSL socketstream, I always get "zero bytes available" even though there should be bytes to read.
Please help.
InputStream in2 = serversocket.getInputStream();
while (true) {
 num = in2.available();
 if (num > 0) {
 buffer = new byte[num]; // allocates memory buffer
in2.read(buffer,0,num);
 System.out.write(buffer,0,num);
 System.out.flush();
 try {
 Thread.sleep(500);
 } catch (InterruptedException e) {
 e.printStackTrace();
What did I do wrong?

I can readLine() from a buffered SSL socket without any problems.
But I can't get the last line because the last line does not contain any <CR> or <LF>.So send it, or don't use readLine().
So, when I try to do a low level read from a raw SSL socketstream, I always get "zero bytes available" even though there should be bytes to read.So don't use available(). It's not guaranteed to return anything other than zero, and in SSL it doesn't.
 num = in2.available();Pointless. Remove this line.
 if (num > 0) {
 buffer = new byte[num]; // allocates memory bufferAllocate a buffer with a fixed size, outside this loop.
in2.read(buffer,0,num);in2.read(buffer);
 System.out.write(buffer,0,num);Correct.
 System.out.flush();Do that outside the loop.
 Thread.sleep(500);Completely pointless and literally a waste of time.
What did I do wrong?Almost everything. Try it with the corrections suggested.

Crm_order_maintain ,changing pricing condition value at item level

Hi,
I am trying to change the pricing condition value at item level while creating sales order through CRM_ORDER_MAINTAIN.
I am not able to change the condition value.
Code is below.
 wa_inputfields-ref_guid = wa_orderi-guid.
 wa_inputfields-ref_kind = 'B'.
 wa_inputfields-objectname = 'PRIDOC'.
 wa_fieldname-fieldname = 'KBETR'.
 append wa_fieldname to wa_inputfields-FIELD_NAMES.
 wa_fieldname-fieldname = 'KMEIN'.
 append wa_fieldname to wa_inputfields-FIELD_NAMES.
 wa_fieldname-fieldname = 'KPEIN'.
 append wa_fieldname to wa_inputfields-FIELD_NAMES.
 wa_fieldname-fieldname = 'KSCHL'.
 append wa_fieldname to wa_inputfields-FIELD_NAMES.
 wa_fieldname-fieldname = 'WAERS'.
 append wa_fieldname to wa_inputfields-FIELD_NAMES.
 INSERT wa_inputfields INTO TABLE it_inputfields.
wa_pricing_add-KSCHL = 'ZP06'.
wa_pricing_add-WAERS = 'USD'.
wa_pricing_add-KBETR = '10'.
wa_pricing_add-KPEIN = '1'.
wa_pricing_add-KMEIN = 'ST'.
INSERT wa_pricing_add INTO table it_pricing_add .
wa_pricing-REF_GUID = wa_orderi-guid.
wa_pricing-REF_KIND = 'B'.
wa_pricing-PRICING_TYPE = 'A'.
wa_pricing-COND_ADD = it_pricing_add.
wa_pricing-PRICING_PROCEDURE = 'ZVDSP'.
append wa_pricing to it_pricing.
Can you tell me how to overwrite the condition value while creating sales order using crm_order_maintain.?
Regards,
Indhra.E

Hello Indhra,
Check the CT_INPUT_FIELDS table, in the OBJECTNAME field you will find all the tables that are filled during the function call. Check those tables mentioned in the OBJECTNAME to look for any pricing related data.
When your order is in change mode and you activate debug just before you make the change, the CRM_ORDER_MAINTAIN FM call contains data only relevant for the change you just made. In other words, you need to fill exactly the same tables as CRMD_ORDER does.
E.g. You just change the pricing procedure and you see in debug that 5 tables are filled, you must do exactly the same in your code! It's quite anoying but you're using a low-level API FM that can handle ANY transaction type in CRM!
Check it, it works!!
Reward points if useful!
Regards,
Joost

Allow processing of Virtual Copies at lower resolutions than original RAW

At times an original image is slightly soft, but looks just fine when processed at a lower resolution. In ACR the ability to do the RAW processing itself with a preview of the image rendered at a lower resolution than the original is most helpful in such situations. It would be fabulous if in LR it was possible to create a VC of a file that was set to a lower resolution than the original, e.g. 5Mpx from an 8.2MPx RAW image, with all processing and previews of that Virtual Copy then being displayed with a 100% zoom being the 5MPx image. Currently you have to guess what a downsized export might look like, or take it into Photoshop, for what might be a simple operation.

This seems to be a very frequently requested feature, and fo rus it would certainly be the #1 missing functionality.
We use Lightroom to work on large batches of event/wedding photographs, all taken in RAW format.
1. With current 'absolute' presets, there's no telling what it will do to any given photograph: a "antique photograph" preset will do wildly different thing to a photograph under tungsten, as to a photograph under sunlight or fluorescent or flash.
2. Similarly, our workflow is interrupted: instead of being able to colour/exposure correct all images and then apply a preset to this _fixed_, 'normalized' version, for consistency of look; we have to play with images one by one, or go to workarounds like export/import: all of which defeat the point of Lightroom as a workflow-enhancing app.

Condition - filter at lower level than displayed

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for