Condition Order Bundle Svc

Condition Order Bundle Svc
How can I conditionally order a bundle service based on a selected radio value? Any assistance would be appreciated.

Hi Ajay, This is SAP Standard & you will have no option to change this, I have earlier raised an OSS to SAP regarding this, they also told the same..

Similar Messages

Conditional order by clause with multiple columns

I would like to know whether it is possible to include multiple columns in a conditional order by clause.
Ex: I have written the following PL / SQL :
CREATE PROCEDURE GetProducts
@OrderBy VARCHAR(50),
@Input2 VARCHAR(30)
AS
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON
SELECT Id, ProductName, Description, Price, Quantity
FROM Products
WHERE ProductName LIKE @Input2
ORDER BY
CASE
WHEN @OrderBy = 'ProductNameAsc' THEN ProductName
END ASC,
CASE
WHEN @OrderBy = 'ProductNameDesc' THEN ProductName
END DESC
END
Now I want to include when the Orderby - "Productnameasc" then order by productname, price, stdate
else
orderby productname, crdate, category
Could this be done? I tried it, but couldn't get this to work.
Any help is greatly appreciated.

Since matching ORDER BY columns have different data types (first column for CLERK is sal - number, first column for MANAGER deptno is number but first column for "else" is a string) we need to convert number to string but preserve number sort order. Since DEPTNO is NUMBER(2) we will use TO_CHAR with format 'S00'. Since SAL is NUMBER(7,2) we will use TO_CHAR with format model 'S00000D00'. For EMPNO we will use TO_CHAR with format model 'S0000'.
select deptno,
        empno,
        ename,
        job,
        sal
from emp
order by case job
             when 'CLERK' then to_char(sal,'S00000D00')
             when 'MANAGER' then to_char(deptno,'S00')
             else ename
           end,
           case job
             when 'CLERK' then to_char(deptno,'S00')
             else job
           end,
           case job
             when 'CLERK' then job
             when 'MANAGER' then to_char(empno,'S0000')
           end
    DEPTNO      EMPNO ENAME      JOB              SAL
        20       7369 SMITH      CLERK            800
        30       7900 JAMES      CLERK            950
        20       7876 ADAMS      CLERK           1100
        10       7934 MILLER     CLERK           1300
        10       7782 CLARK      MANAGER         2450
        20       7566 JONES      MANAGER         2975
        30       7698 BLAKE      MANAGER         2850
        30       7499 ALLEN      SALESMAN        1600
        20       7902 FORD       ANALYST         3000
        10       7839 KING       PRESIDENT       5000
        30       7654 MARTIN     SALESMAN        1250
    DEPTNO      EMPNO ENAME      JOB              SAL
        20       7788 SCOTT      ANALYST         3000
        30       7844 TURNER     SALESMAN        1500
        30       7521 WARD       SALESMAN        1250
14 rows selected.
SQL> SY.

Condition order in Custom MIRO

Dear All
I have create one Imported PO with all the conditions custom duty conditions. Now at the time of custom MIRO, the order of these 7 conditions are not comming as per the order of duties in PO. These are displaying in the alphabetical order of conditions name i.e.
JADC - Additional Duty
JCDB - Basic Custom
JCV1 - In CVD
JEC1 - S&H Ecess on CVD
JEC2 - S&H Ecess on Custom
JECV - Ecess on CVD
JEDB - Ecess on BCD
But I need the order
JCDB - Basic Custom
JCV1 - In CVD
JECV - Ecess on CVD
JEC1 - S&H Ecess on CVD
JEDB - Ecess on BCD
JEC2 - S&H Ecess on Custom
JADC - Additional Duty
Because in my PO the order of the Condition is as above.
Please guide.
Regards
Ajay

Hi Ajay, This is SAP Standard & you will have no option to change this, I have earlier raised an OSS to SAP regarding this, they also told the same..

DB view - join conditions order

Hi gurus
I wonder if, while creating a DB view, the order of join conditions will affect the overall performance. In my case, i need to join COEP, COBK and TKA01. Actually the join conditions are, in this order:
COEP     MANDT     =     TKA01     MANDT
COEP     KOKRS     =     TKA01     KOKRS
COBK     MANDT     =     COEP     MANDT
COBK     KOKRS     =     COEP     KOKRS
COBK     BELNR     =     COEP     BELNR
To achieve a better performance, may I change the order (up/down or left/right)?
Thank you! <removed by moderator>
Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Jan 19, 2012

My problem is that basis admnistrator is asking me why in the execution plan there is a TABLE ACCESS FULL COBK (see 5th point of the log). Any suggestion?
SELECT STATEMENT ( Estimated Costs = 644.937 , Estimated #Rows = 0 )
---   7 HASH JOIN
( Estim. Costs = 644.937 , Estim. #Rows = 3.507.206 )
Estim. CPU-Costs = 41.978.142.620 Estim. IO-Costs = 640.056
Memory Used KB: 1.252.352
Access Predicates
--   2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TKA01
Estim. CPU-Costs = 5.909 Estim. IO-Costs = 0
1 INDEX RANGE SCAN TKA01~0
Search Columns: 1
Estim. CPU-Costs = 2.784 Estim. IO-Costs = 0
Access Predicates
      ---   6 HASH JOIN
( Estim. Costs = 644.895 , Estim. #Rows = 2.475.675 )
Estim. CPU-Costs = 41.623.110.298 Estim. IO-Costs = 640.056
Memory Used KB: 21.261.312
Access Predicates
--   4 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID COEP
( Estim. Costs = 502.319 , Estim. #Rows = 2.475.675 )
Estim. CPU-Costs = 19.972.892.425 Estim. IO-Costs = 499.997
3 INDEX RANGE SCAN COEP~1
( Estim. Costs = 149.180 , Estim. #Rows = 2.475.675 )
Search Columns: 3
Estim. CPU-Costs = 16.424.997.869 Estim. IO-Costs = 147.270
Access Predicates Filter Predicates
5 TABLE ACCESS FULL COBK
                  ( Estim. Costs = 100.134 , Estim. #Rows = 20.711.400 )
                  Estim. CPU-Costs = 16.102.369.535 Estim. IO-Costs = 98.262
                  Filter Predicates

Conditional order by IR report

Hi all,
Is it possible to make the order by in a IR query conditional? Eg
select x,y,z
from table
order by case when :PX_ITEM = '1' then x desc
else y desc, z asc;
Thank for any help,
Maurice

Hi,
It seems you can not do that with IR
Regards,
Jari

Ordered Bundle With Existing Service

I ordered the phone + internet bundle for 69 / mo. The offer includes a free laptop or Flip camera. When I ordered online, it did not give me the option to choose which free gift I wanted. So I called, and Verizon verified my order, etc. but they said they could not guarantee that I would receive the free gift because I was an existing customer. So then transferred me over to the E center whatever and I have been transferred 4 times now, every time someone comes on, I state my issue and they say "ok hold on and i'll get that taken care of" then I'm on hold forever. What the heck?
Anyone else deal with this?
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Yeah, existing customers should be treated even better than new customers IMO.

How to order IPS Svc for ASA5515-K8 and L-ASA5515-IPS-SSP=?

Hello!
I have got ASA5515-K8 and IPS license L-ASA5515-IPS-SSP= ordered separately.
What smartnet should I order to enable IPS singnature updates?
I tried to order SU1 smartnet for ASA5515-K8, but Product ID ASA5515-K8 is not mapped to SU1 service.
Thank you!

Hello Andy,
Here is the information you are looking for:
Cisco Services for IPS
Cisco Services for IPS is an integral part of the Cisco ASA 5500-X Series IPS Solution and enables operators to
receive time-critical signature file updates and alerts. Part of the Cisco Technical Support Services portfolio, Cisco
Services for IPS allows your Cisco ASA 5500-X Series IPS Solution to stay current on the latest threats so that
malicious or damaging traffic is accurately identified, classified, and stopped. Cisco Services for IPS features
include:
● Signature file updates and alerts
● Registered access to Cisco.com for online tools and technical assistance
● Access to the Cisco Technical Assistance Center
● Cisco IPS software updates
● Advance replacement of failed hardware
For more information about Cisco Services for IPS, visit
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6076/serv_group_home.html.

Freight Conditions not populating on free of charge sales order deliveries

I need some assistance, please. I have searched SCN, but have not been able to find a solution to my problem.
We need to be able to charge freight charges on Free of Charge sales orders and am not able to get the charges to populate in the delivery. We send the product for free, but sometimes need to charge the customer shipping charges.
Below are steps I have completed:
Created custom header condition of ZFRC
Added to sales order pricing procedure as a manual condition
(the charge will be updated from external system)
Created Delivery Pricing procedure containing only my
freight conditions (also manual condition)
VTLA settings for item category KLN (free of charge item):Condition Order requirements – 1 Header
VTFL settings for item category KLN:
Pricing Type – D Copy pricing elements unchanged
Price Source – E Delivery/Order
There are times when the freight charges will be added to the sales order, but I also need to be able to add them directly on the delivery.
When charges are added directly to the sales order, they will flow thru to the invoice without an issue, but when I try to add at the delivery level, they are not populating, which results in $0 invoice.
I am not receiving any kind of error messages when trying to add the charges.
We also have this situation with standard orders, but I am not having any problems with it. I tried to mimic that set up for free of charge orders, but it is not functioning properly.
Any assistance would be much appreciated.
Thanks!

Hi Amitesh,
Yes, the condition type used in the Sales Order is the same, ZFRC and it is also a header condition.
The condition analysis is not available in the invoice because there is no condition in the invoice. Below are screen shots of the analysis from the LINE ITEM of the delivery note (there is not analysis available on the header) and the header details of the conditions from the invoice and the delivery.
Line Item Analysis:
Delivery Header Details:
Invoice Header Details:
Please let me know if you need further information.
Thank you for your assistance!

Order specific control over condition type

Dear Gurus...
There are two oder (sales docments)types and two condition types, out of them one condition type has to be applicable for both order types and another condition type has to be applicable only for one order type how to configure....
This is Project Manager interview question any idea please help to rescue...
Thanks in advance
siva

Hi Siva,
You do like this
You define two pricing procedures
In one procedure you put both condition types(For Ex ZZZ1).
Iin second pricing pricedure you put onecondition type which is applicable to both the document types(For ex:ZZZ2).
You define two different document pricing procedures to that order types.
Document pricing procedure for Both conditions order Z1
Document pricing procedure for single condition order Z2
Assign that document pricing procedure to those sales document types.
Now you do the two pricing procedure determinations differently based on the new document pricing procedures.
Sales area+Z1-->ZZZ1
Sales area+Z2-->ZZZ2
Now you can get one condition type in both order types and another condition type only for one order type.
I hope it will clear for you,
Regards,
Murali.

Form Personalization is not working for copied Sales Orders

Hi All,
We have a requirement in Sales Order form, if the order type is "Standard" then Ship method field should be mandatory.
We were able to do this using below form personalization, it is working for new order creation.
When we did the below testing it is not working
Inactivated the ship method and try to copy the order with Standard type the field remains mandatory and null but still it is allowing to book the Sales Order.
Please help to sort out this issue, let me know if it is not clear
Condition
Trigger Event : WHEN-NEW-ITEM-INSTANCE
Trigger Object: ORDER.SOLD_TO
Condition:
(:ORDER.ORDER_TYPE not like '%STANDARD%')
Action
Type : Property
Object Type : Item
Target Object : ORDER.SHIPPING_METHOD
Property Name: REQUIRED
Value: True
Thanks,
CSK

Hi CSK,
try it in well validate item trigger.
If that order type is list then you may disable the field in WHEN LIST CHANGED trigger itself.
Hope it will work,
Regards,
Soofi

Order type Personalization Problem in Standard Sales Order Form

Hi All,
We have a problem in personalization of Sales order form.Here we are trying to personalize three field based on order type
Scenario 1:_
_Nav-->Oredr Management Super User-->Orders,returns-->Sales Orders-->order type-->standard_
In this type if we are navigating to lines it should ask the following fields as mandatory
(Nav-->Oredr Management Super User-->Orders,returns-->Sales Orders-->others form)
1.Shipping Method
2.Freight Terms
3.Shipment priority
Scenario 2:_
_Nav-->Oredr Management Super User-->Orders,returns-->Sales Orders-->order type-->Bill only & Internal & RMA_
then it should navigate to line items without asking those three mandatory fields.
For that we did the following Personalization through Help-->Diagnostics-->Custom Code-->Personalize
Level--> Form level
Enabled-->Yes
Condition_
Trigger Event: When-Validate-Record
Trigger Object: Order
Condition : +(:ORDER.ORDER_TYPE not like '%INTERNAL') and (:ORDER.ORDER_TYPE not like '%BILL%') and (:ORDER.ORDER_TYPE not like '%RMA')+
Processing mode : both
level:site
Actions_
seq:10
type:property
description:Make field mandatory
language:all
enabled:yes
object type:item
target object :ORDER.SHIPPING_METHOD
property name:REQUIRED
value:TRUE
Problem+_
The problem we are facing is when we first select the ordar type as Bill only or Internal or RMA it is working as expected. But first if we are select the order type as standard then we navigiting to lines it is not allowing us without entering those three mandatory fields as expected. Hence the problem is without closing the form we changed the order type as Bill only now also those fields remains as mandatory this is issue .
So hope the problem is clear to you all and we have to move this in production on tomorrow.
If somone helps to resolve this ASAP we would thankful to you.
Thanks in advance
Regards,
CSK

Hi Sandeep,
Thanks for your quick response.
you might not have getting the our problem sorry. let me explain you clearly
If the ordre type is standard the following fields should be mandatory without those fields it should not navigate to line items_
1.Shipping Method
2.Freight Terms
3.Shipment priority
If the ordar type as Bill only or Internal or RMA_
1.Shipping Method
2.Freight Terms
3.Shipment priority
non mandatory should navigate to line items
for that we did three personalization for those three fields as in the previous post
but the problem is
when we first select the ordar type as Bill only or Internal or RMA it is working as expected the fiel sare non mandatory the without closing the form if we select order type as standard then if i try to navigate lines it is not allowing me without entering the three fields. But incase first we are select the order type as standard then we navigiting to lines it is not allowing us without entering those three mandatory fields as expected. Hence the problem is without closing the form now we changed the order type as Bill only or internal or RMA now also those fields remains as mandatory this is issue .
hope now the problem is clear to you .
Thanks in advance
Regards,
CSK

Purchase Order Currency on PDF

Dear SAP experts,
I have a vendor whose 'Conditions-Order Currency' in the 'Vendor: Purchasing Data' is updated with 'DKK' (Danish Kroner). I normally create PO for this vendor with either DKK or USD currency. There is no issue when the PO is updated with 'DKK'. However, when I updated any PO with 'USD' and print/save the PO to PDF, the currency on the PDF file is displayed with 'DKK' instead of 'USD' (or any other currencies specified on the PO header level).
As per my understanding the currency updated on the PO overwrites the currency on the vendor master data [when different currency(s) is(are) used on the PO).
Questions:
1. How do I make the currency on the PDF/print out to display the currency as per update on the PO? E.g. USD instead of the vendor order currency DKK.
2. Why is the currency of the PDF defaulted to that of the currency from the vendor order currency?
I would really appreciate a solution/suggestion on how to handle this.
Cheers,
JPN

I guess that the PDF printout is not a standard SAP layout, but was adjusted to your organization requirements. Therefore, there's a good chance that there's a logical error in reading the currency for the printout.
You should ask your local ABAP programmer to have a look at it, and fix it.

In ASCP Workbench - Need to take action against sales order types

Hi Team,
I am facing one issue, In ASCP workbench, when we query an item with conditions Order type=Sales Order, I can see many rows with Action=Release, Action=None.
Some rows with Action=None is in pink colour (without taking action against this in ASCP WB) and some in black colour.
For rows with Action = Release, We can check the Release check box and can modify the "Implement date" field, Save and Release (Tools-->Release). Then we can see the changes in Schedule ship date field in Sales Order line (Source Instance)
But for Action=None, We can't check the Release check box (But User want to implement New date for this also)
Since this is linked with OM, I am in a position to solve the issues urgently based on the below questions.
1. Which one triggers the Action=Release or None
2. What modification needs to change in SO line (Source instance) to know the changes in Action column in ASCP WB.
3. User needs to implement new dates for the items having Action=None also. For this how can override or any workaround is there?
Note: For the items having same Old due dates and
Please suggest me ASAP.
Thanks and Regards,
Ramesh

Dear Ramesh
Ones in Pink - Your plan is ATP enabled plan. So if there is a new sales order entered in OM module there is a sales order entry made in the ATP table the moment its scheduled in source. But since ASCP has nt been run yet they are still showing actiona s none in the plan.
W r t one with action release your understanding of ship date updation through ascp release is correct.
Why does customer want to chnage date on other sales orders (action-none) ? . ASCP has planned and it is saying that such is the date of expected shipment and so action is none. Any business reason why a date change and release is required on action none sales orders? By default behaviour action None cant be released to source .
Best Regards
Partha

Apportion Excise value in Return Sales order

Hi,
With reference to Depot scenario, when there is a return sales order created reference to Customer Invoice, the Excise values are not getting apportioned with reference to manual change in the quantity.
As per our customized routine the excise values are copied from Excise invoice to the customer invoice, instead of condition record. And as per the copy control settings the excise values are directly copied from Customer invoice to Return sales order. But when the quantity is changed in the return sales order only the Base price is changed, but the excise invoice (condition type - JEXP) is not changed as per the changed quantity.
If i do the update price in return sales order(order type - ZRC) the excise value is picked from condition order, but as per requirement of the business they will not do the update price, only the quantity in the return sales order is changed by the user.
Can you please let us now the solution how to apportion the excise value based on changed quantity.
Regards,
Jagadish

but the excise invoice (condition type - JEXP) is not
changed as per the changed quantity.
Assuming that the Calculation Type of your above condition type is percentage, I have a feeling that unless you wrongly assigned the From-To step number in your pricing procedure, definitely, based on the quantity, your price will vary and based on this price, your ED should also get changed. So check your return depot pricing procedure once again.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Select one record for the first matching condition only in four where condi

I need your suggestion to write one tricky SQL query to select only one record from database on the following condition.I explained simple table structure below.I have a table temp with four columns a,b,c,d in it.
I have to select column d from this temp table based on the following four conditions.If it matches any condition, It should skip other conditions, that's the tricky thing.
Conditions order is like shown below.
1) a='argument1' and b='argument2' and c='argument3'(If it matches this condition, it should stop selecting below 3 conditions)
2) a='argument1' and b='argument2' and c='none'(If it matches this condition, it should stop selecting below 2 conditions)
3) a='argument1' and b='none' and c='argument3'(If it matches this condition, it should stop selecting below condition)
4) a='argument1' and b='none' and c='none'(this is last condition)
If I use OR operator , it matches all of those other conditions too.I never wrote query like this before.
I greatly appreciate if somebody sheds light on me to start writing this query with a simple suggestion.
Thanks,
GD

This forum might help you out, as they are experienced SQL developers, however, this forum is primarily for queries about the tool, SQL Developer. I recommend you post this on the SQL & PL/SQL forum where they focus on these queries:
PL/SQL
Sue

Condition Order Bundle Svc

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for