In ASCP Workbench - Need to take action against sales order types

Hi Team,
I am facing one issue, In ASCP workbench, when we query an item with conditions Order type=Sales Order, I can see many rows with Action=Release, Action=None.
Some rows with Action=None is in pink colour (without taking action against this in ASCP WB) and some in black colour.
For rows with Action = Release, We can check the Release check box and can modify the "Implement date" field, Save and Release (Tools-->Release). Then we can see the changes in Schedule ship date field in Sales Order line (Source Instance)
But for Action=None, We can't check the Release check box (But User want to implement New date for this also)
Since this is linked with OM, I am in a position to solve the issues urgently based on the below questions.
1. Which one triggers the Action=Release or None
2. What modification needs to change in SO line (Source instance) to know the changes in Action column in ASCP WB.
3. User needs to implement new dates for the items having Action=None also. For this how can override or any workaround is there?
Note: For the items having same Old due dates and
Please suggest me ASAP.
Thanks and Regards,
Ramesh

Dear Ramesh
Ones in Pink - Your plan is ATP enabled plan. So if there is a new sales order entered in OM module there is a sales order entry made in the ATP table the moment its scheduled in source. But since ASCP has nt been run yet they are still showing actiona s none in the plan.
W r t one with action release your understanding of ship date updation through ascp release is correct.
Why does customer want to chnage date on other sales orders (action-none) ? . ASCP has planned and it is saying that such is the date of expected shipment and so action is none. Any business reason why a date change and release is required on action none sales orders? By default behaviour action None cant be released to source .
Best Regards
Partha

Similar Messages

Is qty shipped against Sales Order visible in ASCP workbench?

Hi
Is it possible to view qty shipped against Sales Order in ASCP workbench either in collected data or plan output?
Regards,
Utkarsh

Hi Utkarsh
There are a few scenarios which may happen if there is a shipped qty against a sales order line:
1. Qty Shipped is within shipping tolerance - Sales order line will be closed and its no more an active demand for planning (assuming inventory/ invoicing interface etc are already run). While this SO line still may be collected in APS, its only used for forecast consumption purposes.
2. Qty Shipped is outside shipping tolerance - Sales order line will be split automatically with shipped line being closed (with same behavior as above in #1) and new line with balance quantity.
Thus, planners WB doesn't need to show shipped quantity though I'm interested to learn the business objective for requesting this information in Planner's WB?
Thanks
Navneet

What should be take action against following sql tuning report.

Hi
what should be take action against following sql tuning report.
SQL ID : fn3mt5dvm7fba
SQL Text : SELECT * FROM (select
     to_number(ow.waybl_no) waybl_no,ow.id wb_id,
     To_Number(ogp.gp_no) gp_no,
     To_Number(ots.trip_sht_no) trip_sht_no,
     otr.nm,
     ots.gty_br_mast_id,
     DECODE(otr.sign_recd,'1','YES','NO') Sign_Recd,
     DECODE(otr.stamped,'1','YES','NO') Stamped,
     otr.dlvry_dt dlvry_dt,
     otr.tel_no,
     --otr.remarks,
     Decode(otr.comments, NULL,'','Yes') remarks,
     otr.id ID,ops_safex_utl.get_br_nm(to_number(ow.bkg_br_mast_id))
book_br,
     ow.pick_dt book_date
from
     ops_ts_reconsile otr,
     ops_pultd_wb_dtls opuwd,
     ops_trip_sht ots,
     ops_waybl ow,
     ops_ultd_wb_dtls ouwd,
     ops_gate_pass ogp
where
     otr.trip_sht_id=ots.id and
     otr.pultd_wb_dtls_id=opuwd.id and
     opuwd.ultd_wb_dtls_id=ouwd.id and
     ouwd.gate_pass_id=ogp.id and
     opuwd.waybl_id=ow.id and
     otr.status_lid=157 and
     ots.gty_br_mast_id = (:br_Id) and
     (otr.dlvry_dt = :searchDate OR :searchDate IS NULL) and
     otr.note_prpd = 'N' and otr.pod_recd = '1' and
     not exists (select TS_RECONSILE_ID from OPS_POD_FRWD_NOTE_DTLS
where TS_RECONSILE_ID = otr.id)
union
select
     to_number(ow.waybl_no) waybl_no, ow.id wb_id,
     To_Number(ogp.gp_no) gp_no,
     null trip_sht_no,
     ogr.nm,
     ogp.dlvry_br_mast_id,
     DECODE(ogr.sign_recd,'Y','YES','NO') Sign_Recd,
     DECODE(ogr.stamped,'Y','YES','NO') Stamped,
     ogr.dlvry_dt dlvry_dt,
     ogr.tel_no,
     --ogr.remarks,
     Decode(ogr.comments, NULL,'', 'Yes') remarks,
     ogr.id ID,ops_safex_utl.get_br_nm(to_number(ow.bkg_br_mast_id))
book_br,
     ow.pick_dt book_date
from
     ops_gp_reconcile ogr,
     ops_gate_pass ogp,
     ops_waybl ow
where
     ogr.gp_id=ogp.id and
     ogp.waybl_id=ow.id and
     ogp.dlvry_br_mast_id = (:br_Id) and
     (ogr.dlvry_dt = :searchDate) and
     ogr.note_prpd = 'N' and ogr.pod_recd = 'Y' and
     not exists (select GP_RECONSILE_ID from OPS_POD_FRWD_NOTE_DTLS
where GP_RECONSILE_ID = ogr.id)) QRSLT ORDER BY trip_sht_no desc
Bind Variables :
1 - (VARCHAR2(32)):37069
2 - (DATE):07/11/2011 00:00:00
3 - (DATE):07/11/2011 00:00:00
4 - (VARCHAR2(32)):37069
5 - (DATE):07/11/2011 00:00:00
FINDINGS SECTION (3 findings)
1- SQL Profile Finding (see explain plans section below)
2 potentially better execution plans were found for this statement. Choose
one of the following SQL profiles to implement.
Recommendation (estimated benefit<=10%)
- Consider accepting the recommended SQL profile.
execute dbms_sqltune.accept_sql_profile(task_name => 'TASK_58643',
task_owner => 'SYS', replace => TRUE);
Recommendation (estimated benefit: 99.15%)
- Consider accepting the recommended SQL profile to use parallel execution
for this statement.
execute dbms_sqltune.accept_sql_profile(task_name => 'TASK_58643',
task_owner => 'SYS', replace => TRUE, profile_type =>DBMS_SQLTUNE.PX_PROFILE);
Executing this query parallel with DOP 128 will improve its response time
99.11% over the SQL profile plan. However, there is some cost in enabling
parallel execution. It will increase the statement's resource consumption by
an estimated 14.56% which may result in a reduction of system throughput.
Also, because these resources are consumed over a much smaller duration, the
response time of concurrent statements might be negatively impacted if
sufficient hardware capacity is not available.
The following data shows some sampled statistics for this SQL from the past
week and projected weekly values when parallel execution is enabled.
Past week sampled statistics for this SQL
Number of executions 17494
Percent of total activity 7.2
Percent of samples with #Active Sessions > 2*CPU .63
Weekly DB time (in sec) 614696.04
Projected statistics with Parallel Execution
Weekly DB time (in sec) 704166.9
2- Restructure SQL finding (see plan 1 in explain plans section)
An expensive "UNION" operation was found at line ID 4 of the execution plan.
Recommendation
- Consider using "UNION ALL" instead of "UNION", if duplicates are allowed
or uniqueness is guaranteed.
3- Alternative Plan Finding
Some alternative execution plans for this statement were found by searching
the system's real-time and historical performance data.
The following table lists these plans ranked by their average elapsed time.
See section "ALTERNATIVE PLANS SECTION" for detailed information on each
plan.
id plan hash last seen elapsed (s) origin note
1 209247904 2011-07-12/10:09:08 7.564 Cursor Cache
2 4029269565 2011-07-12/10:20:21 15.374 Cursor Cache original plan
3 4128886984 2011-07-08/11:30:25 42.426 AWR
4 3695555639 2011-07-12/08:30:30 101.459 AWR
Recommendation
- Consider creating a SQL plan baseline for the plan with the best average
elapsed time.
execute dbms_sqltune.create_sql_plan_baseline(task_name => 'TASK_58643',
owner_name => 'SYS', plan_hash_value => 209247904);
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SECTION
- The optimizer could not merge the view at line ID 3 of the execution plan.
The optimizer cannot merge a view that contains a set operator.
- SQL Profile "SYS_SQLPROF_01306b26f6aa0000" exists for this statement and
was ignored during the tuning process.

afzal wrote:
Hi
what should be take action against following sql tuning report.
<snip>Perhaps no action at all.
You can ALWAYS produce a report that will show "top 5" issues. The question is NOT "do I have an issue reported by a tuning report". Yes you do. Everyone does. Always. Even if you slowest batch job runs in 1.3 seconds and your slowest OLTP transaction completes in 0.0001 second.
The question is "do I have a problem that is serious enough to spend time solving?"
If your average OLTP transaction completes in 3 seconds, how much effort is justified to get a 50% improvement?
How much effort is justified to get that same 50% improvement on transactions that complete in 1.5 seconds? 0.2 seconds?
Beware of Compulsive Tuning Disorder.

Purchase Order against Sales Order

Hi Experts,
It could be possible to prepare purchase order against sales order in which the data of sales order could be pulled in purchase order. Please help me in this matter.

Hi Shailesh......
Off course it is possible. All you need to do s Open Sales Order and go to Logistic Tab and while creating Sales Order ctick on Split Purchase Order and the moment you add the Sales Order it will Pop up the Purchase Order creation window where you need to fill the details and add PO and then add Sales Order.
But if you have defined Preferred Vendors in Item Master Data then while autocreation of PO by this way will take its Preferred vendors automatically.......
Regards,
Rahul

Short supply against sales order

Hi,
Is it possible to get short supply matrial list against the sales order
For EG:
we are the computer manufacturer's
So when ever we will sales order(MTO scenario) we will manufacture the PC and deliver it aganist the sales order.
But some times what happens is mouse is not in a stock but customer is ready to take deliver with mouse also. when ever we will get mouse in stock the will deliver to the customer.
But my requirement is i want know what are the short supplied material against the sales order.

Hi Siva,
I have given just EG of one scenario thats all.
But in real scenario these problems are facing.
This type of problem in the ETO scenario also(Project system).
Because some customer need the delivery immediately.
with out some parts also they can use the finish material
So just i need report against sales order what are the short supplied material

Manual Creation of PO against Against Sales Order AAC - M

Dear Gurus ,
I am facing issue that , as in MTO scenario some of the components in my BOM material is not fixed and they can be known after some time like labels of finish goods , now i want to create Manual PO with reference to sale order AAC is M , but i found that when MRP is creating purchase requisition , G/L account in acc. ***. tab is stock G/L , but when i am creating manual PO it is taking G/L from GBB Acct modification VKA (account as in acc. assignment cat. is M.)
But I want it should take G/L from BSX as it is taking in case of MRP generated PR against same sales order.
Thanks & Regards,
Akshay

Dear Sir ,
As here we are taking valuated stock against sale order , we are using account assignment category M and requirement class with valuation M and account assignment category M , as per bellow link.......
Valuated Sales Order Stock Configuration - ERP Financials - SCN Wiki
now i am facing problem , when MRP is creating purchase requisition , G/L account in acc. assignmrnt. tab is stock G/L from BSX which is right , but when i am creating manual PO with respect to same sales order , it is taking G/L from GBB Acct modification VKA (account as in acc. assignment cat. is M.)
But I want it should take G/L from BSX because stock is valuated stock.
Thanks & Regards,
Akshay

Stock reservtion against Sales order creation

Hi friends,
Presently in our system, after creation of sales order, Stock against sales order has been reserved
& same has been shown in MD04.
In case of demand for same material from our regular customer ,we can not delivered it to them.
In SPRO,WHICH SETTING SETTINGS NEED TO CHANGE TO AVOID STOK RESERVATION AGAINST SALES ORDER.

Hi,
unCheck - Transfer of reqirement in Sch. line cat

Production against sales order

Hi all experts,
I am creating a report for Linewise width wise handover
summary(OK production against sales order)
I am taking Date from MKPF and QTY from MSEG
I need to show Work Center [ CRHD-ARBPL ]
but dont know how to link tables
can any one send me the code and link btween MSEG and
CRHD or any other table which having ARBPL field linking with
MSEG.
Thanx in Advance ......

Hi,
CAUFV and AFKO tables are linked with table CRHD. These two tables are related to order. You can try these tables to get the desired data.
Regards
Amit parkhi

Time booking against Sales Order

Dear All
I would like to know whether can i book time against sales order in CAT2 transaction. That is Rec. Sales Order or Rec. Sales order item.
I need to transfer the price into controlling
I have tried with the above but system throws an error of cost element
Please advise
Regards
Deepu Pillai

Hi Deepu,
I have also same requirement. Can you share solution if you resolved above issue on CAT2 booking on SalesOrder.
Hi All - If anyone worked on such scenario please guide me.

Reg.Purchase order against sale order( E )

Dear Experts
I configured PO against cost centre (K - Cost center and G/L A/c is created) and it is working.But I want to configure against sale order (E).what is the configuration required. Pls advise in details
Thanks
Rajakumar.K

Dear Raja,
Third-party order processing (for direct-to-customer delivery/drop shipment) is triggered when a sales order containing a third-party item is created.
When this occurs, the system automatically generates a purchase requisition item of the category u201Cthird-partyu201D for each delivery schedule line of the sales order item.
This requisition item is converted into a purchase order (PO) item. Depending on the confirmation control key, the quantities/dates in the sales order are confirmed when the PO is created or an order acknowledgment is maintained.
If you create a third-party item without referencing a requisition generated from a sales order, this is not third-party order processing in the foregoing sense: a matching-up of the data between the SD sales order and the purchase order cannot be carried out in such cases!
Sales Order
In the standard system, the sales order item for the third-party process has the item category TAS (this is found automatically if the item category group BANS has been set in the material master, or it can be changed manually). In the standard system, the schedule line category CS is found for the item category TAS. It is specified in Customizing for the schedule line category CS that a purchase requisition (type NB) with the item category '5' (third-party) and account assignment category 'X' is generated.
The number of the requisition that is generated can be displayed via the delivery schedule lines in procurement.
If a PO is generated from this requisition, it can be seen in the document flow for the SD sales order (Environment  Document flow).
Purchase Requisition
The requisition is generated via the function module ME_REQUISITION_EXT. An important characteristic is that the field EBAN-ESTKZ (creation indicator) contains a 'V'. If a third-party requisition is created in dialog mode, this field does not contain the indicator u2018Vu2019 u2013 that is to say, this is not a third-party process in the sense defined. A source determination process is carried out at the time of creation. The purchase order units found during this process are adopted! The account assignment, containing the number, item, and schedule line of the sales order, cannot be changed in the requisition. The account assignment is the u2018pointeru2019 between the requisition and the SD order!! Since Release 4.6, the delivery address cannot be changed either. The address of the goods recipient (ship-to party) from the SD order is adopted as the delivery address (caution: this can be located both at header and item level in the SD order).
There is a requisition item for each delivery schedule line in the sales order!
Purchase Order
Purchase order items generated from the above requisitions contain EKPO-STATU = 'V'. The delivery address comes directly from the sales order (see LMEPOF3T MEPO_ITEM_FILL_ADDR) and cannot be changed. Neither can the account assignment be changed; here too it is the 'pointeru2019 between the PO and the sales order. In the standard system, the account assignment category is 'X', with KZVBR = ' '. Since the account assignment is located at item level, you must not convert several third-party requisitions into a single PO item, otherwise the update of the sales order is liable to fail!
An 'actual' goods receipt does not take place with regard to a third-party item. The 'WEPOS' indicator is not set for the item categories 'S', but can be set manually. The posting of a GR results merely in a value update here. The entry of a vendor invoice can be made dependent on the prior entry of a GR. In the third-party process, this only makes sense if you wish to prevent the customer from receiving an invoice before having received the goods. A goods receipt should be recorded when the vendor reports the outward delivery.
At the time of saving, the document flow and confirmations are updated in the SD order. If problems should arise on the SD side due to changes (e.g. the customer has been blocked), an error message is issued here first!
In the case of third-party items generated without reference to a 'third-party requisition', i.e. the item category u2018Su2019 is merely entered manually, there can be no update between SD order and purchase order. Here, for example, the delivery address is not read from the sales order u2013 it must be entered manually (mandatory field).
Sanjeev

Reg.Raise PO without PR against sales order number

Dear priyanga
I want to raise PO against sale order,How to configure against sale order (200000346).
I configured against cost center for that I create Cost centre and G/L account and assignment that's all. Like what are the settings needed.
Pls help
Thanks
Rajakumar.K

hi,
I don't think its directly possible...to confirm this you can see the document overview, and press it ....you can see the reference documents from which the PO can be made...
SO for this develope first the PR then do Po for the same...
By the way you have written my name worngly...
Hope it helps..
Regards
Priyanka.P

How does Down payments against sales orders work?

Hi Gurus,
Can anyone explain me How Down payment against sales orders work? Please give step by step details with configuration.
Regards,
partha
[email protected]

Hi Partha,
This link will take you to the document that will give you an idea about "Down Payments against Sales order"
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/dd/561621545a11d1a7020000e829fd11/frameset.htm
Hope it helps.
Regards
Ayub Khan
Please reward points if helpful

Incoming payments against sales order

Hi Experts,
Our client has a new requirement.
They need a new program to process incoming payments against sales order.
They need sales order included in additional selection of F-28 tcode, and clear payments against sales orders.
Could you please guide what all changes required? I have searched on the portal but didn't find any results.
Thanks

Hi Juliya
I would suggest to copy the Sales Order No in one of the reference field (Ref 1, Ref 2 or Ref3) through an exit at the time of Billing (Assumption is that one billing document will always have one sales order only). You can use the exit EXIT_SAPLV60B_008. This will be triggered when the SD Invoice is transferred to Accounting.
Now you can use F-28 or any custom program for clearing based on these fields.
Additionally make sure that the field you are using is not changeble after a posting has been done, You can control this through configuration. Let me know if you need any further inputs.
Thanks & regards
Sanil Bhandari

Report for Sold to Party code against Sales order number

Hi,
Is there any standard report to take out the Sold to Party code against Sales order number as i have the sales order number.
I don't want to use Tables ,so pls tell standard report if any.

Dear Monty garg.
You can use u201CVA05Nu201D to find the sales orders which have been created against for the particular customer/sold to party.
Please let me know if any further clarifications pertinent to this.
Thanks&Regards
Raghu.k

Reg.Purchase against sale order

Dear Friends
Anybody have idea regarding purchase material against sale order and that will be kept as stock.
As and when it is used according to the requirement. The procurement should be posted to stock account in purchase order itself. how to do it. pls help me.
Thanks
Rajakumar.K

Dear ,
i thinck ur company using trading business
based on sales order u can create PO with account assignment E Sales order , system will asl sales order number in account assignment data at item detail level.
the process will be
Pre-shipment Shipment Procedure :
1) create a sales order
2) create PO with account assignment E where system will ask for sales order number
3)delivery with vl10n
3) preshipment invoice-VF01
POST-SHIPMENT Procedure:
1) do the GR the stock will be invetorized for ur sales order
2)invoice verification MIRO
3)Final Delivery: vl02 u have to change the intial delivery
4)Final (Post-Shipment) Invoice: VF01
work with ur FI consultant for G/L accounts
Regards
venu gopal
Edited by: venu kk on May 19, 2009 6:36 AM

In ASCP Workbench - Need to take action against sales order types

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for