Condition Records not to be calculated if base value is negative

Dear all
I have configured a pricing procedure which is being used while performing DP90 with reference to service order. Now the values are getting populated in condition type EK02 and based on this value various other charges like service tax, supervision charges are getting calculated.(condition records have been maintained for condition types related to these charges). Is it possible that these charges do not get calculated if the value in EK02 is negative?????

You can create a routine where you can put the check. And assign it to pricing procedure for all the condition types you don't want negative value for.
Thanks

Similar Messages

SD: Condition record not getting automatically determined

Hi,
Condition record not getting automatically determined for a condition type for which following access is maintained.
The access has table containing following fields:
Sales Organisation
Distribution Channel
Division
Sales Document type
Sales Document No.
Material no.
Following is the scenario:
A sales order is created for Project Systems attach a WBS element to the line item .
With respect to the above created sales order a Billing request ( a sales doc. type which is different than the above sales order). When the billing request is created materials appearing in the line item will be different.Different materials will appear in the billing request because of the DIP profile maintained.
The prerequisite is that before creating billing request the sales employee has to maintain condition master record with above access.The condition record will combine sales organisation, distribution channel, division, sales document type ,
sales document number ( the 1st refered sales order)
and the material are different
than the ones maintained in the 1st sales order.
This will enable in getting billing request generated without manual intervention in pricing for other materials for which condition records have been maintained as stated above.
Following is the error message we get
===================================
" Inactive X Inactive via formulae of incorrect "
Thanks
Aby
Message was edited by: Aby Jacob Emmanuel

As I know, thats just a warning message(if its a std one).
Ignore it and save.
Check your pricing date of the document. For execution it should be similar or after valid-from date maintain in condition record.
But, you need not create a condition record. Simply change the existing one combination of your desire. But, this warning will come there also for your combination.
Thanks & Regards
JP

Condition record not found for service net price

Hi Experts,
I have seen other posts related to this topic but didnt solve my issue. Issue is: in one system when trying to create PO for requisition, it says please enter a price for service item since "condition record not found" (because package number is wrongly taken as '00000000'. i dont know why).
In another system, again the condition record was not found but its taking some non-zero value for ESLL-NETWR and successfully creating PO.
In both the systems, coding is the same. No extra coding in user-exists. I think package is not properly determined. But in tables ESLH/ESLL, i see the values are stored in exactly the same manner as in the other system. I literally see no difference.
What could be the problem?

Solved myself.
The difference was in the purchase organization data. Depending on this field there was some check: 'Ignore requisition price in PO'. This was checked in one system for a purch org due to which it was not picking the price from PR data.

Condition record not determined in PO for Taxes

HI All,
I have maintained the necessary condition type in ZTAXIN (Copy of TAXINN) Procedure for Surcharge which is calculating on VAT 12.5% for Haryana State. System is not calculating for this condition type but system is calculating Taxes for other condition types.
I have checked in FV12 also, records are exists. I have also checked in Tax condition type it is also showing the records for access.
When i am checking analysis for Tax Procedure for Surcharge condition it is showing error as - "Condition record exists (Manually removed)".
Kindly help me to resolve this issue.
Thanks in advance.
Sure points will be awarded.
Regards,
Neeraj Saini

If u are using copy of TAXINN , u need to classify condition types. The condition type u r using for VAT shud be classified as combination of tax procedure and condition classification
following is the path to the setting
Logistics - General >>>>>Tax on Goods Movements>>>>>India>>>>>Basic Settings>>>>>>Determination of Excise Duty >>>>>>Condition-Based Excise Determination >>>>>>Classify Condition Types
enter ur tax procedure .. vat condition type ... and vat tax classification.
hope it help.
regards
Avinash

Condition record not floe in po

hi
i copy key combination plant/material group to plant/material group/vendor combination.
b'caz i use 16% for some vendor and 3% for other in fv11.
but system is not pick condition record from plant/ma.group/vendor combination
sugest
sunil

Hi
You need to add the new condition table in the access sequence of the condition type for getting it trigerred.
& Delete all the Condition records which were maintained earlier with old combinations if any.
If the Check indictaor Exclusive is flagged then condition records of that Combination only will be picked up
Award points if useful
Thanks & Regards
Kishore

Condition records not copied from order to invoice

Hi,
I created an order and it has contion types for Frieght cost and packing cost...for both condition rocrds were found and triggered in order but whn cheked in invoice...records are not copied to invocie level..and when checked in analysis it says "access not made" for both the conditions...
Fields combination for these are shipping point and material frieght group for both condition types...
i checked the validity dates for both conditions and are still in validity dats.
Can anyone advice me is there some thing else i need to check and why condition records are not copied to invoice.
Thanks in advance
Balu

Hi Sumanth,
Copy controls are fine...it is actually delivery related billing scenarios..and in delivery to billing copy contrls in header in determine export dat feild it is set to "B :Redetermine the export data" and at tiem level the pricing type is set to "C:Copy manual pricing elements and redetermine the others"
Kindly let me know if the settings are fine or the problem is woth these settings
Regards
Balaji

Condition record not pulled for all material

Hi,
I have three materials in sales order. now, for each material , I am maintaining some condition record in VK11. the problem i face is, if in case I don't maintain condition recrod for condtion ZCD1 for the first material A in sales order, the condtion records that I have maintain for the same condtion ZCD1 for the following materials are also not getting pulled. that's true for all conditiond in my pricing procedure. only those conditions for which system could find records for the first material, it pulls it for all other materials that follow material A in sales order. otherwise, system gives the messgae " condition record has been found but not set "
what could be the reason? this is certainly not the standard behavior.
Thanks,
Binita

I have checked this with creating new records for all material for all condtions. but, it is possible that a particular price condtion may not be maintained for the first material and which can very well be maintained for the folllowing materials. in that case, they are not pulled. the records are there for sure for other materials as 1) i could see them in VK13 and 2) the condition analysis tells me that condtion record is found but not set. no clue what it has got anything to do with first material..as soon as i maintain that condtion for first material (even zero value in Vk11), they start appearing for other materials as they are maintained.
Thanks,
Binita

Condition record not appearing in SO

Dear all,
I maintained the Condition record..but it is not commining into the sales order...but what i took the combination fields are appearing in sales order(i checked in Analysis tab).
Thanks in Advance
Regards
raj.

Hi,
If you are maintaining the same field combinations for both access sequences JLST&JCST, then change the field combinations as follows
Create a new condition table for a new access sequence for the combination of
Country/PlntRegion/Region/TaxCl2Cust/TaxCl.2Mat for CST.
and for VAT maintain the same 368 table with the acess seq of JLST. And create two condition records for JLST&JCST condition types.
In customer master if the customer is relevant for VAT(Local sales) then put appropriate indicator of JLST(maintain JCST indicator=0(Nil tax)) . Similarly if the customer is from some other state the put relevant tax indicator for JCST.(here, JLST=0(nil)
I hope u have maintained Material master tax indicators for both JCST&JLST.
Hope this will solve ur issue
Reg
JJ

Condition records not generated in CRM from ECC

Hi all,
I have downloaded objects DNL_CUST_CNDALL, DNL_CUST_CND , DNL_CUST_PRC, from ECC to CRM successfully.
I got all the condition types, access sequence and tables.including CUSXXX tables.
I have also got few condition records for condition types SAPXXX . I am not able to get the condition records for the CUSXXX tables.
Suggest me how to proceed further.
Regards
Yaswanth.K

Yes I have checked the SLG1. There were one error..
"No Entries Determined for the A Tables (Block 1)"
I am not able to judge how to proceed with that error.
The detailed Text is diapleyed under..
Diagnosis
No entries have been transferred from R/3 to CRM for one of the following reasons:
1. The R/3 condition table does not contain any entries.
2. The maintenance authorization has been transferred to CRM. This means that data in the R/3 condition table can no longer be downloaded from R/3.
System Response
Error message CND_MAP 312
Procedure
If this maintenance authorization has been transferred to CRM in error, this can be transferred back in exceptional circumstances so that a data download from R/3 is possible.
Regards
Yaswanth.K

Active condition record not displayed

Hi,
During pricing, the active condtion record is picked up.. but not displayed in pricing. The analysis says " Condition record exists (removed manually)"
The detail analysis says
This message tells you that the condition record exists but has not been set in the document. If new pricing is carried out for the document item, the condition would be set.
There can be different reasons why the condition has not been set:
The condition has been manually deleted from the item condition screen.
The condition record was created later. Here it should be noted, that order processing and pricing have buffer mechanisms. This has the effect that a newly added condition record is only found after you have completely left order processing and called up the condition record again.
When an item was added, other key fields were used to access the condition record than the change time. This means that the conditionalcheck at the add and change times could have different results. This can be seen when modifications are made.
I am very much sure, the record has been created much before the sales order date. If I do carry out new pricing the active condition record is picking up correctly
any idea?

Hi
Are you checking the value in Sales order, before saving the document?
If yes, please check for the value from VA02/VA03 after saving the Order.
Thanks,
Ravi

Re : Condition record not getting picked

Hi All,
This is with reference to Inter-company PO.
A condition record has been maintained for MWST condition type(for key combination of Departure country -ID & Destination Country BE).But the system is not picking this condition record but it is picking the condition record maintained for MY to BE.
Could you please tell me where I need to check if a condition record is not getting picked.
Regards,
Mahesh.

Dear Mahesh
- Check your Ship To Party Country
- Ensure that the tax code you have maintained for the combination of ID -- BE
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Pricing condition record not getting executed in Sale order!

hello all
I was trying to process a sale order, when i enter the material, system giving me a message "ZINV" condition type missing. i have checked v/08 there is "check - tick mark" for 'zinv' condition type and I have maintained the condition record.
It is still giving me the same error.
any one can help me?
thanks

Same as above.
If you are getting the error "Mandatory Pricing condition XXX is missing". All you have to do it select the item and then hit pricing icon on the lower section of your screen and then enter the missing condition in the table displayed in front of you and then enter a price etc.
This message can be removed by customizing the pricing procedure and removing the 'Mdt' flag.
Also make sure the condition type has been marked for manual update in the condition detail section.

Pricing - Requirment / calculation type / base value

Dear Friends,
Thnaks for the support and guidance provided by you for my previous posts
In Pricing Procedure we give Requirment, Calculation type and Alternative formula for condition base value, I would like to know where do we exctly define all this?
Or are they standard? If standards where we can see how they works?
Regards
Vishal

Hi,
go through the below Examples for better understanding ..
Example: 1
Condition Type: PR00
Requirement 2 Item with Pricing
Purpose:
This is an example of a pricing requirement. This requirement is met if the document item category is relevant for pricing and no previous condition in the pricing procedure has set the condition exclusion flag. This requirement can be assigned to condition types in the pricing procedure to avoid unnecessary accesses to the database when an item is not relevant for pricing or a condition exclusion indicator has been set.
Example: 2
Condition Type: Net value
Calculation Type: 2 Net value
Purpose:
This is an example of a condition value formula. This type of formula can be used to influence the value shown for the condition in pricing. A condition value formula is assigned to a condition type or value line in the pricing procedure.
Formula '2' sets the value equal to net value that has been calculated so far for the item in the pricing procedure. It contains the amount excluding taxes.
Example: 3
Condition Type: R100
Alt.Condition Base Value: 28 (100% Discount)
Purpose:
This is an example of a condition base value formula. A condition base value formula can be used to influence the basis the system uses when computing a pricing value. A condition base formula is assigned to a condition type in the pricing procedure.
Formula '28' sets the rate of the condition to a 100% discount. This formula was delivered with condition type R100 to support free goods functionality.
Reward if it is useful,
Chandramohan

Wrong depreciation calculated for base value 04 + EA-FIN activated

Hi,
after activating EA-FIN, depreciation for assets using base value 04 (= half of replacement value) is calculated wrong.
While AW01 for a particular asset shows depreciation values based on the FULL replacement value (like it would be base value 03) AW01_AFAR (the u201Coldu201D asset explorer) shows the correct depreciation for base value 04.
The wrong base value can also be seen using the "display depreciation calculation" button in both transactions.
There are no enhancements for base value determination active.
I didnu2019t find any SAPNET notes nor SCN entries regarding this case, any ideas?
Best regards, Christian

For what it's worth, I did a search and didn't find anything either.
It sounds like you've already tried this, but if the base value (the actual $$ value) is different in the trace on both tcodes then you have a problem. I would be sure to recalculate the values when you enter AW01 and AW01_AFAR to ensure that it's correct before looking at the trace.
The formula for the replacement value is:
( u_ganlc-kansw + u_ganlc-answl +
               u_ganlc-kmafa + u_ganlc-mafav + u_ganlc-zusma +
               u_ganlc-mafam + u_ganlc-mafal +
               u_ganlc-kaufw + u_ganlc-aufwv +
               u_ganlc-aufwp + u_ganlc-aufwl ) / 2 .
I'd look at ANLC for the asset and do the calculation yourself to confirm the value.
You've probably done all of that so I predict an OSS message in your future !
-nathan

Wrong calculation in base value while capturing Excise IV(IMPORT)

Hi all,
any provision to correct base value while capturing EX IV for <b>imports</b>, in ECC 6.0
as note was released by sap for earlier versions.
will it hold good for this version also?
regards
Krishna

Hiii Santosh,,
After applying the Notes still the Excise Values are not captured??
Please tell if any other Notes to be applied???
Regards,
Kumar Rayudu

Condition Records not to be calculated if base value is negative

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for