Condition type ICN3 is blocked in FTXP.

HI. people.
Somebody knows to tell me how can i do to active the condition type ICN3 in transaction FTXP? The line is black and i can´t do any changes. The line should be in blue, either the others. I don´t know what...
Thank you.

Hi,
In FTXP for ICN3 condition maintain Tax Percent. Rate and just enter it will become active as in blue colour
This conditions are apear in FTXP from tax calculation procedure which is assigned to your country.
Kapil

Similar Messages

Invoice blocked for qty reason, but condition type deleted from the PO

Hi Gurus,
I have an LIV with R block in the header level. The invoice contains a line item for planned delivery cost condition type FRB1 which was entered manually during PO creation.(no condition record exists for FRB1). But the condition type FRB1 is missing from the PO line item now and when trying to release the invoice block via MRBR, it gives the message that the 'list is incomplete'.
The PO is not having any release strategy and the invoice number is available in the index table RBKP_BLOCKED.
The condition type FRB1 got deleted from the PO on re-triggering the pricing. The business needs the pricing to be carried out on the shipment date from the vendors site. So when the vendor issues the goods, the same is updated in the pricing date field in PO line item and the pricing is re-triggered. So in this case the happenings were in the below sequence.
1. Buyer created PO with manually entered FRB1 condition type.
2. Invoice posted against the PO.
3. When vendor has shipped the goods, the ASN updates the pricing date in the PO and carries out re-pricing. The FRB1 got deleted from the PO on re-pricing as no condition record existed.
4. Goods receipt posted
5. Trying to release the invoice in MRBR, but the system gives the message that the list is incomplete.
Please suggest how to go ahead with the resolution of the issue.
Regards,
Greg

Gregory Mathews wrote:
Hi Gurus,
>
> I have an LIV with R block in the header level. The invoice contains a line item for planned delivery cost condition type FRB1 which was entered manually during PO creation.(no condition record exists for FRB1). But the condition type FRB1 is missing from the PO line item now and when trying to release the invoice block via MRBR, it gives the message that the 'list is incomplete'.
> The PO is not having any release strategy and the invoice number is available in the index table RBKP_BLOCKED.
>
> The condition type FRB1 got deleted from the PO on re-triggering the pricing. The business needs the pricing to be carried out on the shipment date from the vendors site. So when the vendor issues the goods, the same is updated in the pricing date field in PO line item and the pricing is re-triggered. So in this case the happenings were in the below sequence.
>
> 1. Buyer created PO with manually entered FRB1 condition type.
> 2. Invoice posted against the PO.
> 3. When vendor has shipped the goods, the ASN updates the pricing date in the PO and carries out re-pricing. The FRB1 got deleted from the PO on re-pricing as no condition record existed.
> 4. Goods receipt posted
> 5. Trying to release the invoice in MRBR, but the system gives the message that the list is incomplete.
>
> Please suggest how to go ahead with the resolution of the issue.
>
> Regards,
> Greg
Hi Greg,
Are there any a/c entries showing in GR a/c doc for this cond type? I think it could be a bug when you run the ASN Idoc. Try to un-check Delete indicator for FRB1 which would stop it getting deleted.
Regards
Shiva

How to block particular condition type not being posted

Hi,
We don't want a particular condition type ( customized & accruel ) to be posted into accounting when creating a billing. That condition type is deleted and after that this is how it works now.
1. When a billing is cretaed from a new sale order ( which does not have that condition type ) it works fine.
2. When a billing is created from a sale order which refers to the old sale order which in turn has this condition type, then this conditon type is posted into accounting.
Can some one help in this issue so that I want to block this condition type being get posted in accounting. Is there any Userexit or can it be done with other options. I am an ABAPer, please give specific answer.

Hi Jagadish,
The reason why we do account determination is that we would want the system to post the respective amounts to respective G/L accounts automatically. What amounts to be posted to what G/L accounts is decided by the Account keys .
Now if for a particular condition type in the pricing procedure if you remove Account key the system will not post to the G/L accounts. But generally in this case I believe while creating the Bill system will throw an error in account determination.
For that what you can do is create completely new accont key and assign a provisional G/L account which is not to be included in your Balance Sheet accounts or P & L accounts (can be restriscted by FI Guys).
But remember to use a completely new oricing proicedure for this case.
Hope this helps.....
J Nagesh

Block Invoice creation for missing condition type

Hi,
We need to put a chek on the Invoice process, wherein if particular condition type is missing in the relation to sales order, than the Invoice should not get created.
For example-
If Order A - has condition type PR00 which gets fecthed from the condition record (VK11)
And while creating Invoice for the Order A, if someone has deleted the condition record , the invoice gets created without condition type PR00.
Now at this step a block has to be placed which can block the invoice from being created if PR00 is missing.
Please let me know what will be the best appraoch of IMPLEMENTING such check and how to do that.
Regards,
Gaurav

Hi Gaurav,
first if some deletes the condition record for a paricular condtion record,then ask ur users to uopdate the prices by goin to the condition screen.
second create a pricing procedure determination for your billing type in t code ovkk
and in that pricing procedure just maintain the settings as per mentioned by Mr.Lakshmipathy.
Revert if helpful
l
Mohit Singh

Condition type to block pricing for particular plants

Dear All,
We have one Sales Organisation under which 40 plants are there. I want to block a condition type for 10 plants. Please suggest me what are the different alternatives to do that?

Dear Suresh,
As your Condition Type is used in almost 30 plants mean it would be determined by Condition Access.
Now as you know a Access Sequence would be assigned to the Condition Type & subsequently Condition Tables are assigned to Assequence Seq, to search for Condition Records.
Now include Plant as one of the search strategy in your Access Sequence / Condition Tables. Then maintain Condition Records for 30 plants in which you require this Condition Type.
For rest of the 10 plants as there is no Condition Record, the Condition Type would be be determined for these Plants.
Hope this helps...
Thanks,
Jignesh Mehta

Blocking of condition types

Hi,
How to block the condition types in purchasing. Users should not be able to enter the blocked condition types in condition tab of Purchase order.
Thanks,
Srinivas

in condition type defination make manual processing not allowed this will forbid manual entry by user
and in pricing schema make check manual condition in front of condition this will stop automatic picking of value.
however it is suggested to create an additional pricing procedure and assign new vendor schema to vendor master.
regards
avinash

Urgent issue related to condition type block

Dear expert I need your help on issue
Example Sales Deal # 123456:
If Sales Deal is opened with transaction VB22 (e.g. to add a condition record or to amend one), then all condition records appear first as released (blank in column u201CSu201D status and u201CPu201D processing status):
But just after a slight scroll within the screen, both columns get a value (u201CAu201D in column u201CSu201D and u201CDu201D in column u201CPu201D) and therefore appear as u201CBlockedu201D and u201CDouble Check Neededu201D:
But if the SAVE button is pressed, then the system reports, that no changes have been done:
Actually when we enter with transaction VB22, condition records are not blocked, but released:
But when we scroll then changes happened even we scroll in Vk12 or VB22
Condition validity u2013is 10.04.2008 to 01.06.2008
Regds
Alicia K

You can use lsmw and do a recording to insert those new customer fields. LSMW can call bdc recording and you can enter the values there...

Error message FF762 " Condition type MWVS tax code A8 does not extist- MIRO

Dear all,
after support packagesi mplemented , I've the problem with transaction MIRO,
because I cannot released the invoic for the folloqiong error:
FF762 " Condition type MWVS tax code A8 does not extist.
Please, could you help me.
Thanks in advance for your cooperation
Gaetano

Hi,
Go to FTXP and give the tax code A8.
In the resultant screen, select the condition type MWVS, and link the condition type to an account key.
Make sure all the other tax determination settings are fine
Now, try the transaction it should work fine.
Hope this helps you

Condition type MWST tax code A1 does not exist

Hi all,
I'm facing the problem while I'm releasing Billing doc to Accounting. This is the error
Condition type MWST tax code A1 does not exist
Message no. FF762
Diagnosis
When calculating tax, the system tried to determine the condition amount and the condition number from tables A003 and A053 using the specified condition type and tax code. However, no values were found there.
System Response
The specified amount cannot be posted in FI.
Procedure
Check the Customizing settings for the specified tax code. Check whether the validity period (possible with tax jurisdictions) is defined.
I have already checked FTXP, and the Tax Code is already there.
I have already checked the condition record, and it is already there,
Maybe I have missed something...?
Thanks before for all your help
Regards,
Rizki Harris

Hi Typewriter,
1. Check in a previously created invoice, accounting document - the tax code? (FB03) is it A1?
   --> the tax code is A1
2. In VK12, MWST do you have other values of % tax (e.g. 0%). In a sales order, give appropriate Tax classification values for CMR, MMR so that MWST value = 0. Create invoice and check if you are getting the message
   --> in VK12 for Key Combination Domestic Taxes :
        TaxCl1Cust   TaxCl.Mat     Name                                 Amount     Valid from    Valid To         Tax Code
        0                    1                  Tax Exempt Full Tax                          25.07.2011   31.12.9999    A0
        1                    0                  Liable For Taxe No Tax                        01.01.2008   31.12.9999    A1
        1                    1                  Liable forTaxeFull Tax              10       25.07.2008 31.12.9999    A1
     --> I still don't understand what do you mean by CMR, MMR ?
3. Condition type MWST is not allowed to be processed manually..
Regards,
Rizki Harris

How to Activate a Condition Type in the Tax OCde for A/P -- Very Urgent

Hi Peers
I'm creating a new Tax Code in T.Code FTXP, while creating, One Condition Type is Deactivated, say JM01, How to activate that condition Type. I know how to activate the Condition Type in A/R side but I want to know it in A/P side. Plz help. Its very urgent.
Regards
Rajaram

Hi Rajaram,
U pls Check ur configuration. First u check the calculation procedure (F.A- Tax on sales & purchase-Basic setting-Check calculation procedure _ Define procedure) In the procedure field u check JM01 is activated or deactivated otherwise u created in condition Type.
I think its usefull otherwise u let me know
Thanks
R.Manigandan

New condition type, new tax codes

Hi,
I have created new condition type for tax procedure TAXIN. I have defined the account key for it. The condition type is basically for exempted input tax transaction. Then I created new tax codes by using the new condition type. The percentage of the tax codes is 0 as it is exempted.
When I am trying to post invoice by using above taxcodes, it gives me error that the tax code is not defined in taxprocedure TAXIN.
What could be the reason?

Did you create the tax code in the development or prouction system?
If in development you need to export the tax code by going to FTXP and selecting Tax Code -> Transport -> Export. Then when you release the transport you should go to the Production system and select Tax Code -> Transport -> Import.

New Tax code Creation for CST(Condition type

Hi Friends,
I am facing an issue during creation of new Tax-code for CST; condition type JIN1. After defining the tax percentage; system is picking an automatic G/L account, which is a grey field and can't be editable. We need to change G/L account and need to assign a new one.
Can you please tell us how can we remove the default assigned and non-editable G/L account.
Your support is appreciable.
Rgds, Krishan Raheja.

Hi Krishnan,
Use transaction OB40, here double click on the Account Key (you can check this account key assigned to condition type in OBQ3 and also in FTXP screen) that is mapped to condition type JIN1 and enter your chart of accounts. Now change the G/L account you want.
Regards,
Chintan Joshi.

No accounting document generated while new condition type is added

Hi
I added a new condition type to the pricing procedure. While creating the invoice if i try giving a value to the new condition type then i get the message "No accounting document generated", but when i leave it as blank then there is no problem with the a/c docs.
I assume I haven't done the complete settings correctly. Pls help.
I am using RVAA01 as the pricing procedure for standard order.
Regards,
Sujai

Hi,
As I do not have access to your system, can not comment in details.
But if I have to add a tax codition in pricing, what I would do is :
Create a tax condition, assign it in tax procedure.
Copy it as sales pricing condition.
Assign it in pricing procedure.
Create condition record for tax condition in VK19.
Check tax code in FTXP & its assignment in OB40.
Create condition record for MWST.
I think you need to check the above configuration.
Savita

Problem with multiple condition type for VAT &CST

Hi,Gurus,
pl. suggest the procedure for the following problem.we configured seperate pricing procedures for our product material and scrap material.We have configured same condition types for VAT(ie.condition type:ZVAT) and CST(cond type:ZCST), in both pricing procedures. Now We want to maintain seperate condition types for VAT and CST for pricing procedure for Product material and Scrap material. I have created two new condition types for scrap sales ZSCT- cst for scrap and ZSVT-vat for scrap by copying the same from existing conditions ZCST & ZVAT, and the same is included in the scrap pricing procedure. And also maintained OB40,OBCN,OVK1,OVK3,OVK4, FTXP,FV11 and VK11.
now I am facing the following problems.
1. while creating the Material master & customer master, in tax category sub screen all conditions i.e. conditions defined for product material( ZCST,ZVAT) and defined for scrap material (ZSCT, ZSVT) displaying and these are compulsory fields.
2. While creating the sale order for scrap material, system is considering the TAX classes from ZVAT/ ZCST (defined for product material) and taking the condition value from the condition type ZSVT/ ZSCT with the TAX class values of ZVAT/ZCST.
Now I would like to know is there any procedure to assign the Material type and Customer Account group to Tax category.
Thanks & Regards
sam

Hello Sam,
The Access Sequence Assigned to your New Condition types ie, ZSCT and ZSVT are same as the Previous Condition type ZVAT and ZCST.
After Adding new condition type in the Tax category in the Masters you have to take care of the Sequence of the Condition type.
If ZSCT and ZSVT is on the 3rd and 4th number in the masters the Condition table you are using in the access sequence should have fields Taxclassification3-Customer and taxclassification3- material. For ZSCT
Likewise Taxclassification4-Customer and taxclassification4- material. For ZSVT
Please add New Condition table in the access sequence with the required Field
And next when you are maintaining the condition record for say ZSCT you will have to maintain condition record for the condition table which has Taxclassification3-Customer and taxclassification3.
In Document the values will be flown correctly after changing this.
Hope I have Solved your Query.
If any Doubt please revert.
Regards,
Rohit Dongre

How are US tax condition types XR1 to XR6 calculated

i searched few forums to understand the ways of US taxes getting claculated particularly on condition types XR1 to XR6, is the value available in SAP system or is the percentage value maintained in the taxware or vertex system?
if in SAP where is this maintained, i could see the same input & output tax codes assigned in OBCL settings for many states in US, so i am not able to relate this in FTXP, as different states provide different calculation.
if it is maintained through external system, is there way we can check the values or see in the screen?, how is this link of checking the external system enabled, is it through 301 cal type & its associated function module,
will there be a chance to change this value from the user end or do we need to seek Taxware or Vertex assistance here.
sorry on too many questions.
just got confused with the way it works
Regards
Ilango

Hi Ilango,
Check my responses to your respective questions:
i searched few forums to understand the ways of US taxes getting claculated particularly on condition types XR1 to XR6, is the value available in SAP system or is the percentage value maintained in the taxware or vertex system?
In SAP, only Condition Type XR1 to XR6 are only condition which is responsible for computation of tax in US & Canada. Where, even condition types UTXD & UTXE are equally essential to this. These condition types used for external tax calculation.
if in SAP where is this maintained, i could see the same input & output tax codes assigned in OBCL settings for many states in US, so i am not able to relate this in FTXP, as different states provide different calculation.
Well, I don't think there much from SD side to explorer here. As Tax procedure hardly have any role to play in SD business process for tax rate determination. But, that is very significant from GL Account determination for respective Tax Transaction in SD.
Refer my posts on
Tax code and SAP SD - ERP Operations - SCN Wiki
Plant-wise Different Tax General Ledger Accounts - ERP Operations - SCN Wiki
Whereas, configuration for Non-Taxable transaction as maintained in TCode OBCL, generally comes in picture when Tax Jurisdiction is not maintained in respective Ship-to master. Based on that configuration system will determine Tax Jurisdiction for those Ship-to.
% are maintained in FV11, not in FTXP.
if it is maintained through external system, is there way we can check the values or see in the screen?, how is this link of checking the external system enabled, is it through 301 cal type & its associated function module,
301 is not the only Routine associated. As like UTXD & UTXE there respective routines 500(collect tax input - export to IVP) & 501(get tax output data - import from IVP) are equally important with others 301 to 306(Set tax values and percentage into condition structure and fill tax base amount based on FM GET_TAX_RESULTS_FOR_301_306)
Refer SCN Wiki Tax jurisdiction - ERP SD - SCN Wiki
will there be a chance to change this value from the user end or do we need to seek Taxware or Vertex assistance here.
Hope you are aware, these tax IVPs are tool that is used to calculate taxes for the US tax rules.Yes, you might need to ask respective Tax IVP.
In Taxware, it provides the tax jurisdictions codes for master data addresses in SAP. Based on combination of both tax jurisdictions, the Taxware product code and dates, Taxware returns rates and amounts of tax and which jurisdictions get the tax.
Hope that helps you. If you still have any specific question, do revert back.
Thanks, JP

Condition type ICN3 is blocked in FTXP.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for