Configuration Dual HUB Dual Dmvpn

Hi Dears
i configurate simple DMVPN on my network. Now i want to configurate Dual HUB Dual DMVPN.
i can not find any good configuration documentation how config that.
please provide me a link or any pdf fot configuration DUal HUB Dual Dmvpn .
thanks.

Thanks Paul, I have looked over this design guide as this was the fist place i went. however, i cannot find a configuration example for dual hub/single cloud.
i see the high level design and know you can do it. but it doesnt show what the configuration would look like...unless i am just reading over it.
Thanks

Similar Messages

Different between Dual hub-dual DMVPN cloud Vs Dual hub-single DMVPN cloud

please explain
different between Dual hub-dual DMVPN cloud Vs Dual hub-single DMVPN cloud

Thanks Paul, I have looked over this design guide as this was the fist place i went. however, i cannot find a configuration example for dual hub/single cloud.
i see the high level design and know you can do it. but it doesnt show what the configuration would look like...unless i am just reading over it.
Thanks

Dual-DMVPN Design with Dual Hubs on a single router ??

Hi All,
In DMVPN, in Dual-DMVPN Design with Dual Hubs , can a single router perform the role of dual hubs.
The router has two different internet links. It is intended that when one link goes down, spokes shud connect to the same router onto the other active internet connection. Is this possible ?

Since no one has answered yet, I'll give you the practical answer.
You'll have issues with IPSec and static routing. "DMVPN" itself probably wouldn't have an issue, but it would depend on IPSec and routing to work.
It is easier, by far, to put in a second router. And when you factor in your time to try to make it work (and it may not work), the second router is less expensive.
Rob

Startup network configuration dual homed

FRUSTRATION: 100% .. Over a month trying to startup network configuration dual homed .. MacMini Intel Dual .. System Preferences --> Network --> Two Locations (BuiltIn ether on the IP my router uses for the world www, smtp, dns, ntp, limited ssh 192.168.local.wired.fixed) and (AirPort for VNC, ssh for admin via laptop)
Upon reboot, I have o login back to the Mini keyboard/CRT to reset these two locations. I am NOT passthru routing.
Bad enough the CRT settings will ot start my 20in VGA till I restart the video on an old low-res monitor.
No where near ready to install the Server pack. Looking thru the web stuff, there are Unix like files (missing) to force the addresses and default route. No ifconfigd found.
Where do I find a netconfig, rc.conf or like files to force the Mini (OS 10.4.7) to come up with my two interfaces and default route?
PLEASE .. Ev +1 805 340-6471 [email protected]

This is the wrong forum for this topic, but I'll assist.
Without configuration sync enabled, you would have to configure both Nexus 5K exactly the same for the FEX port before traffic will forward.
Configuration sync would help you in only having to configure it once, but I have had mixed results using configuration sync so I tend not to use it in my deployments.

Configuring Dual-homed servers for redundancy to 6509s

I am looking for assitance in properly configuring dual-homed servers for redundancy to two CatOS based 6509s. My search for information on how to do this has been unsuccessful to date, so any help you can provide would be most appreciated.
Do I need any special hardware/software on the 6509s and/or on the servers?
Thanks, in advance.
John

A lot depends on the kind of servers you have and the NIC teaming algorithms they support. Usually two or more NICs can be teamed in either a fault tolerant configuration (with one primary NIC) or in transmit load balancing configuration. Both these configurations allow the NICs to be connected to separate L2 switches so in case your servers do support such kind of teaming all you need is to have both NICs in the same VLAN and ensure L2 connectivity between the Catalyst 6509s. I recommend you research this from the server perspective also and like everything else test it before production deployment.

Abap server proxy on IS configured as HUB

Hi,
My scenario is;
web serv. client (soap) => XI srv => abap proxy
In the abap proxy I want to return some binary data as attachment. Seems to me that I'm not allowed to execute
abap proxy on the XI IS since the error msg is;
- <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1">
<SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="INTERNAL">PROXY_NOT_ALLOWED_ON_IS</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1 />
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
<SAP:Stack>Proxy calls on the sender or receiver side are not permitted on the IS (client)</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>N</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
The engine type is configured as HUB.
Can someone confirm this, or is it something I can do?
best regards
Torstein

Hi,
>>>>Are there any configuration settings need to be done for using same client.
yes there's one: TCODE - SXMB_ADM - integration engine config
if you set your client as HUB then you cannot use proxies
if you set it as application server then you can use proxies
but this is not a problem how can you use proxies on the same client but why?
XI is an integration server - use for message transfer not for building applications on it
XI offers many ways to communite with it but not for being an application sever itself
ERP 2004 can have XI on the same instance (server)
but you also need to use another client to work with XI
so most probably this will not change
the conclusion: build your applications on applicaiton servers (r3 for instance) and leave XI for message transfer only
Hope it clears a little
Regards,
michal
<a href="/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/06/28/xipi-faq-frequently-asked-questions">XI FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions</a>

Issue with configuring Hyperion HUB 7.1.2 with SQLSERVER 2005

Hello Experts,
One of my customer has an issue with configuring Hyperion HUB 7.1.2 with SQLSERVER 2005.
"We are trying to configure the SQL server 2005 database with Hyperion hub and we are unable to get the cofiguration completed. We suspect the driver class (hyperion.jdbc.sqlserver.SQLServerDriver) used in the domain.xml (path \Hyperion\HyperionHub\7.2.1\deployments\Tomcat\4.1.30\) is not helping to connect with sql server 2005. We would appreciate if you can provide new driver class which we can included while deploying the app under the web server."
Please suggest. Thanks in advance
Regards,
Sonu

Hi
Please redeploy only the Web Server under shared service. It has to be redeployed once EPMA and others are configured.
Thanks
Rupak
Mantra to Win | WinMantras.com | http://hyperion.winmantras.com

Dual-DMVPN with Dual Hubs

Are there any routing issues when using mGRE interfaces on spokes. I need spoke-to-spoke connectivity. Obviously if I opt for p-pGRE interfaces then traffic from spoke-to-spoke will have to go via one of the hubs.
I understand there was a limitation in IOS whereby mGRE interfaces on spokes prevented it from learning many routes via the hub.
tia
Ajaz

Since no one has answered yet, I'll give you the practical answer.
You'll have issues with IPSec and static routing. "DMVPN" itself probably wouldn't have an issue, but it would depend on IPSec and routing to work.
It is easier, by far, to put in a second router. And when you factor in your time to try to make it work (and it may not work), the second router is less expensive.
Rob

Dual Hubs & Single DMVPN

Hi, i AM FACING PROBLEM . When i close the connection of existing spoke and hub router 1 it must get connected to hub router 2. But un-fortunately its not working. Any clue
HUB ROUTER 1 Configuration:
interface Tunnel10
description $FW_INSIDE$
bandwidth 1024
ip address 192.168.10.100 255.255.255.0
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables
no ip proxy-arp
ip mtu 1400
ip nbar protocol-discovery
no ip next-hop-self eigrp 1
ip flow ingress
ip flow egress
ip nat inside
ip nhrp authentication abc_vpn
ip nhrp map multicast dynamic
ip nhrp network-id 99
ip nhrp holdtime 300
ip nhrp nhs 192.168.10.100
ip nhrp server-only
ip virtual-reassembly
ip tcp adjust-mss 1380
no ip split-horizon eigrp 1
delay 1000
qos pre-classify
tunnel source GigabitEthernet0/1
tunnel mode gre multipoint
tunnel key 100000
interface gigabitethernet0/1
ip address 86.96.196.xxx 255.255.255.240
HUB ROUTER 2 Configuration:
interface Tunnel10
bandwidth 1000
ip address 192.168.10.95 255.255.255.0
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables
no ip proxy-arp
ip mtu 1400
ip nbar protocol-discovery
ip flow ingress
ip flow egress
ip nhrp authentication arco_vpn
ip nhrp map multicast dynamic
ip nhrp map multicast 86.96.196.xxx
ip nhrp map 192.168.10.100 86.96.196.xxx
ip nhrp network-id 99
ip nhrp holdtime 300
ip nhrp nhs 192.168.10.100
ip virtual-reassembly
ip tcp adjust-mss 1360
delay 1000
qos pre-classify
tunnel source GigabitEthernet0/1
tunnel mode gre multipoint
tunnel key 100000
interface gigabitethernet0/1
ip address 78.93.203.xx 255.255.255.252
SPOKE ROUTER Configuration:
interface Tunnel10
bandwidth 512
ip address 192.168.10.74 255.255.255.0
no ip redirects
ip mtu 1500
ip nbar protocol-discovery
ip flow ingress
ip flow egress
ip nhrp authentication arco_vpn
ip nhrp map multicast 78.93.203.XX
ip nhrp map 192.168.10.95 78.93.203.XX
ip nhrp map 192.168.10.100 86.96.196.XXX
ip nhrp map multicast 86.96.196.XXX
ip nhrp network-id 99
ip nhrp holdtime 300
ip nhrp nhs 192.168.10.100
ip nhrp nhs 192.168.10.95
delay 1000
qos pre-classify
tunnel source GigabitEthernet0/0
tunnel mode gre multipoint
tunnel key 100000

Do you have dynamic routing to fallback between the tunnels ?
Mashal Alshboul

Dual DMVPN Dual Hub Request for Help?

                   Hello Anyone with DMVPN experience,
                    Can you please have a look at my DMVPN queries in the attached document?
                    Thank you
                    Regards
                    Phuc Le

Hi Phuc Le,
I found for you a quite detailed design and implementation guide. Please read carefully and implement a test bed. I'm sure you will get support for specific issues if you run into problems.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/solutions/Enterprise/WAN_and_MAN/DMVPN_2_Phase2.html
These documents are carefully written and I never encountered any problems with such reference implementations.
Also: Please don't formulate your questions in an attached document, this makes it diffucult for us to give you answers.
Best regards, MiKa

[SOLVED] Configure dual head with different resolutions xf86-video-ati

I have 1680x1050 and 1280x1024 monitors which I would like to setup so that I have two displays (:0.0 and :0.1), i.e. can't drag a window to the other display, but can move the mouse from one screen to the next. The graphics card is Radeon HD 4850.
At the moment I have one screen only, so I can't move the mouse from the first to the second screen, it is captive in the first screen.
xrandr -q
Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1680 x 1050, maximum 1680 x 1680
HDMI-0 connected 1280x1024+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 338mm x 270mm
1280x1024 60.0*+ 75.0
1280x960 60.0
1152x864 75.0 70.0
1024x768 75.0 70.1 60.0
832x624 74.6
800x600 72.2 75.0 60.3 56.2
640x480 75.0 72.8 66.7 59.9
720x400 70.1
VGA-0 connected 1280x1024+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 338mm x 270mm
1280x1024 60.0*+ 75.0
1280x960 60.0
1152x864 75.0 70.0
1024x768 75.0 70.1 60.0
832x624 74.6
800x600 72.2 75.0 60.3 56.2
640x480 75.0 72.8 66.7 59.9
720x400 70.1
DVI-0 connected 1680x1050+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 474mm x 296mm
1680x1050 60.0*+
1600x1200 60.0
1280x1024 75.0 60.0
1440x900 75.0 59.9
1280x960 60.0
1152x864 75.0
1280x720 60.0
1024x768 75.0 70.1 60.0
832x624 74.6
800x600 72.2 75.0 60.3 56.2
640x480 75.0 72.8 66.7 59.9
720x400 70.1
xorg.conf:
Section "ServerLayout"
Identifier "dual head configuration"
Screen 0 "Screen0" 0 0
Screen "Screen1" RightOf "Screen0"
InputDevice "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard"
EndSection
Section "Files"
EndSection
Section "Module"
Load "glx"
Load "dri"
Load "drm"
EndSection
Section "InputDevice"
# keyboard added by rhpxl
Identifier "Keyboard0"
Driver "kbd"
Option "XkbModel" "pc105"
Option "XkbLayout" "us"
EndSection
Section "Monitor"
Identifier "Monitor0"
Option "VendorName" "ATI Proprietary Driver"
Option "ModelName" "Generic Autodetecting Monitor"
Option "DPMS" "true"
DisplaySize 444 277
EndSection
Section "Monitor"
Identifier "Monitor1"
Option "VendorName" "ATI Proprietary Driver"
Option "ModelName" "Generic Autodetecting Monitor"
Option "DPMS" "true"
DisplaySize 339 271
EndSection
Section "Device"
Identifier "Videocard0"
Driver "radeon"
BusID "PCI:2:0:0"
EndSection
Section "Device"
Identifier "Videocard1"
Driver "radeon"
BusID "PCI:2:0:0"
EndSection
Section "Screen"
Identifier "Screen0"
Device "Videocard0"
Monitor "Monitor0"
DefaultDepth 24
SubSection "Display"
Viewport 0 0
Depth 24
Modes "1680x1050"
EndSubSection
EndSection
Section "Screen"
Identifier "Screen1"
Device "Videocard1"
Monitor "Monitor1"
DefaultDepth 24
SubSection "Display"
Viewport 0 0
Depth 24
Modes "1280x1024"
EndSubSection
EndSection
Xorg.0.log:
(==) ServerLayout "dual head configuration"
(**) |-->Screen "Screen0" (0)
(**) | |-->Monitor "Monitor0"
(**) | |-->Device "Videocard0"
(**) |-->Screen "Screen1" (1)
(**) | |-->Monitor "Monitor1"
(**) | |-->Device "Videocard1"
(**) |-->Input Device "Keyboard0"
It doesn't look as if xrandr can help as it reports a maximum virtual desktop of 1680x1680.
Because the two monitors are different resolutions I don't know if a single screen is the answer.
I used to have two displays/screens configured to two different resolutions matching the monitors using the catalyst driver but can't get it working using the xf86-video-ati driver.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks
Willem
Last edited by Willem (2010-01-02 20:42:41)

Thanks, with your help I was able to get it working.
The xorg.conf relevant sections:
Section "ServerLayout"
Identifier "dual head configuration"
Screen 0 "Screen0" 0 0
InputDevice "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard"
EndSection
Section "Monitor"
Identifier "Monitor0"
Option "VendorName" "ATI Proprietary Driver"
Option "ModelName" "Generic Autodetecting Monitor"
Option "DPMS" "true"
DisplaySize 444 277
EndSection
Section "Monitor"
Identifier "Monitor1"
Option "VendorName" "ATI Proprietary Driver"
Option "ModelName" "Generic Autodetecting Monitor"
Option "DPMS" "true"
DisplaySize 339 271
Option "RightOf" "Monitor0"
EndSection
Section "Device"
Identifier "Videocard0"
Driver "radeon"
BusID "PCI:2:0:0"
Option "Monitor-HDMI-0" "Monitor0"
Option "Monitor-DVI-0" "Monitor1"
EndSection
Section "Screen"
Identifier "Screen0"
Device "Videocard0"
Monitor "Monitor0"
DefaultDepth 24
SubSection "Display"
Viewport 0 0
Depth 24
Virtual 2960 1050
EndSubSection
EndSection
Would still be interested to get a seperate display for each monitor working though.

How do I configure dual monitors on JDS?

I just have installed Solaris 10u5 on a Dell E521 with an ATI Radeon X1300 Pro graphics card. This card has 2 connectors onto which I connect a FlexScan S1911 (DVI) and an Acer AL1916 (VGA).
I now have 2 problems:
1. the resolution is beyond usage (ie way too low which gives me huge letters/icons/etc.)
How can I fix it?
If I select "Change Desktop Resolution" from the desktop menu, I get an error msg saying that the Xserver does not support "XRandR".
I also tried kdmconfig in "ASCII mode" but the selections I find are not really useful nor do they show my graphics card.
2. I would like to use the above configuration as dual-head.
How/where do I configure this? (My /device only shows 1 entry and not 2 as I would have expected).
Thanx,
Thomas

For configuring the resolution, you'll have to use 'fbconfig' on the command line. See 'man fbconfig' for details. (This is because S10u5 still uses the Xsun server, which doesn't support resolution changes on the fly.)
For dual screen I believe you have to edit your /etc/dt/config/Xservers file. A quick google throws up a few working examples for Solaris 10, but the details may vary for your cards. Here's one for xinerama mode:
:0 Local local_uid@console root /usr/openwin/bin/Xsun :0 -nobanner +xinerama -dev /dev/fbs/ifb1 defdepth 24 defclass TrueColor -dev /dev/fbs/ifb0
And for non-xinerama:
:0 Local local_uid@console root /usr/openwin/bin/X -nobanner -defclass TrueColor -defdepth 24 -dev /dev/fbs/jfb0 left -dev /dev/fbs/pfb0b

Pre-configured dual-boot Ubuntu and Windows

Of possible interest to the Linux folks: A newly opened Laptops with purpose store is now offering several popular ThinkPad models fully pre-configured with dual-boot Ubuntu Linux and Windows.
These systems come with a lot of pre-installed applications, see Dual boot Linux and Windows page for details.
At the moment, we are working on specific solutions for students, educators, scientists, designers...
Would love to have some feedback from the community on the existing offerings as well as suggestions/wishes for the future ones.

That would be fine if some hp machines didn't have broken UEFI that don't respect setting the default OS.

Help configuring dual ethernet ports

We have a Linksys router doing NAT/firewall and its connected to the WAN. . No DHCP server is running. It has an internal IP of 192.168.16.1 / 255.255.255.0. It plugs in directly to a Linksys business series switch.
I have an intel xserve with dual nics and no idea how to configure them, but I want the server to handle AFP/DHCP/DNS, while a G4 handles mail.
My assumption was to give en0 this setup:
ip: 192.168.16.5
subnet: 255.255.255.0
router: 192.168.16.1
dns: isp's numbers
en1:
ip: 192.168.10.1
subnet: 255.255.255.248
router: 192.168.10.1
dns: 192.168.10.1
Is this setup correct? Because I can't get it to resolve correctly even though I am using a FQDN

I should also add that our website is being hosting externally with a private hosting company. However, we want to host our mail internally on the G4.

Configuring Dual Band on WRT320N

I bought the WRT320N so that I could use dual band to segregate my wireless g traffic from my wireless N traffic to keep the g's from dragging down the speed of the n traffic. However my router is using either one or the other. Is there a way to configure the router to offer both bands at once? Thanks
Solved!
Go to Solution.

No. The WRT320N is single radio. It's not simultaneous dual-band/dual-radio. You can use either the 2.4 GHz band or the 5 GHz but not both at the same time.

Configuration Dual HUB Dual Dmvpn

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for