Configure Voice and Data VLAN in CISCO SF 300 8P

I have a couple of Cisco SF 300 8P and 24 P Switches. I have voice and Data VLAN configured as :
Data VLAN : Default 145.17.59.0/24
Voice VLAN : VLAN 20 172.22.20.0/24
I have different DHCP servers as for Data VLAN we have physical server which is configured for 145.17.59.* IP Scope and Voice VLAN DHCP Server is configured in Gateway router with option 150.
This configuation works fine with other cisco swiches like 2960 and 3750 etc except CISCO SF 300 8P and 24P. I was trying to configure both voice and Data VLAN in these CISCO Switches so that CISCO phone (Model 6941) shold get IP from Voice VLAN and PC should get IP from Data VLAN DHCP Server. I have tried several techniques like LLDP, Port to VLAN Config etc.
Can anyone please guide me/help on this.
Regards,
A K.M.Sayeed

Hi A.K.M., with Cisco phones you should be able to simply set auto voice VLAN to be VLAN20. 
voice vlan id 20
You should ensure CDP and/or LLDP are enabled as well. I would check this in web GUI. DHCP for the phones can come from the switch, a DHCP server on a VLAN20 access port or you can use dhcp helper to redirect DHCP to server elsewhere.
If you prefer or have issues with CDP or LLDP you can also program ports as trunks and add tagged VLAN 20 to them.  In this scenario you need to insure inter-vlan routing is working and that phones download config file with corrrect VLAN config.
These switches do not run ios so they are similar but different than catalyst switches you referred to.
-- please remember to rate helpful posts --

Similar Messages

  • Passing voice and data Vlans on Cisco SG200-08P help

    Hello All,
    I'm struggling with a configuration issue on the Cisco SG200-08P.
    We are using the Cisco SG200-08P on a mobile cart that will go from class room to class room that will have computer and cisco Voip phone plugged into it. The issue is that each of our closets are in differnt VLANS ( 1 voice and 1 data....lets say data vlan 20 and voice vlan 2025 for conversation) and that we route to each closet.
    It would be great if I could just create a generic data and voice vlan to dynamically pick up what the upstream switch has however, it seems that I've been unsuccessful in doing so.
    So far I can pass the data Vlan no probablem. The upstream switch port is set to access port and a switch port access voice vlan (these are 3750x switches)
    If the above is not possible I guess I will take what I can get. Should I just create data vlan 20 and voice vlan2025 on the Cisco SG200-08P and make a trunk port on the Cisco SG200-08P and a trunk on the 3750x? Is there an option on the Cisco SG200-08P to tag voice traffic?
    I'm also concerned with VTP and I did not see an area in the Cisco SG200-08P to set that as a client and transparent mode.
    Thanks for any help,
    Dan

    On a Catalyst switch, when a port is defined as a trunk without a vlan specified on the port, all vlan pass through the port. On a small business switch it is nearly the opposite. You must specify the vlans on the links. Additionally, ingress filter discards anything not associated to the port.
    802.1q specifies there must be an untagged vlan which is the native vlan (of course you can make exceptions, tagging the default vlan..).
    One thing I did in the past with a 2960, I made an LLDP network policy and it basically "provisioned" the downstream switch connecting link and voice vlan. That may be another idea for you.
    Here's a link that may be useful-
    https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3811376
    Here is the 2960 config I used to feed a SB switch voice info
    Switch#show run
    Building configuration...
    Current configuration : 2206 bytes
    ! Last configuration change at 00:41:16 UTC Mon Mar 1 1993
    version 12.2
    no service pad
    service timestamps debug datetime msec
    service timestamps log datetime msec
    no service password-encryption
    hostname Switch
    boot-start-marker
    boot-end-marker
    no aaa new-model
    system mtu routing 1500
    vtp mode transparent
    network-policy profile 1
    voice vlan 100 cos 4
    spanning-tree mode pvst
    spanning-tree extend system-id
    vlan internal allocation policy ascending
    vlan 2
    name test
    vlan 100
    lldp run
    interface FastEthernet0/1
    network-policy 1
    spanning-tree portfast
    interface FastEthernet0/2
    interface FastEthernet0/3
    interface FastEthernet0/4
    interface FastEthernet0/5
    interface FastEthernet0/6
    interface FastEthernet0/7
    interface FastEthernet0/8
    interface FastEthernet0/9
    interface FastEthernet0/10
    interface FastEthernet0/11
    interface FastEthernet0/12
    interface FastEthernet0/13
    interface FastEthernet0/14
    interface FastEthernet0/15
    interface FastEthernet0/16
    interface FastEthernet0/17
    interface FastEthernet0/18
    interface FastEthernet0/19
    interface FastEthernet0/20
    interface FastEthernet0/21
    interface FastEthernet0/22
    interface FastEthernet0/23
    interface FastEthernet0/24
    interface FastEthernet0/25
    interface FastEthernet0/26
    interface FastEthernet0/27
    interface FastEthernet0/28
    interface FastEthernet0/29
    interface FastEthernet0/30
    interface FastEthernet0/31
    interface FastEthernet0/32
    interface FastEthernet0/33
    interface FastEthernet0/34
    interface FastEthernet0/35
    interface FastEthernet0/36
    interface FastEthernet0/37
    interface FastEthernet0/38
    interface FastEthernet0/39
    interface FastEthernet0/40
    interface FastEthernet0/41
    interface FastEthernet0/42
    interface FastEthernet0/43
    interface FastEthernet0/44
    interface FastEthernet0/45
    interface FastEthernet0/46
    interface FastEthernet0/47
    interface FastEthernet0/48
    interface GigabitEthernet0/1
    switchport mode trunk
    interface GigabitEthernet0/2
    interface Vlan1
    no ip address
    interface Vlan100
    no ip address
    ip http server
    ip http secure-server
    logging esm config
    line con 0
    line vty 5 15
    end
    Switch#
    -Tom
    Please mark answered for helpful posts

  • Voice and Data Vlan Routing for CUPC and IP Phones ?

    The IP Phones are in 10.1.1.0/24 network (Voice Vlan 10) , Desktop Computers are installed with CUPC 8.5 and they are in 11.2.2.0/24 network (DATA VLAN 20) , Unfied Communication Applications like CUCM , Cisco Unified Presence Server, Contact Center Express are in 172.16.10.0/24 network(Vlan 30). When using Clients like Cisco Unified Personal Communicator, How the Communication between  CUPC(DATA Vlan)and IP Phones(VOICE Vlan) is possible?.How network should be configured or designed ? If i make intervlan routing it creates Security problems.what is the best practiced network Configs for these kind of Scenario ? Even if i prefer to configure Intervlan routing, Which all TCP/UDP ports are to be allowed / blocked between VLANS ??

    Hi Mohammed,
    Hosts on separate vlans communicate with each other through routing, as they are not in the same broadcast domain. Some of the systems you mention use a wide range of ports and, depending on system and installed version, documentation is generally available.
    e.g
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/port/8_5_1/portlist851.html
    or
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cupc/8_5/english/release/notes/cupc85.html#wp39407
    Be also aware that RTP communication uses extended ranges of ephemeral ports.

  • Best Practices to separate voice and Data vlans

    Hello All .
    I am coming to the community to get some advices on a specific subject .
    One of my customer is actually using vlan access-list to isolate it is data  from it is voice vlan traffic .
    As most of us knows VLAN ACLs are very difficult to deploy and manage at an access-port level that is highly mobile. Because of these management issues they have been looking for a replacement solution consisting of firewalls but apparently the price of the solution was too high in the sky .
    Can someone guide me towards security best practices when it comes to data and voice vlan traffic isolation please ?
    thanks
    Regards
    T.

    thomas.fayet wrote:Hi again Collin , May I ask you what type of fw / switches / ios version you are using for this topology ? Also is the media traffic going through your fw if one voice vlan wants to talk to another voice vlan ? rgds
    Access Switches: 3560
    Distro: 4500 or 6500
    FW: ASA5510 or Juniper SSG 140 (phasing out the Junipers)
    It depends. In the drawing above, no voice traffic would leave the voice enclave until it talks to a remote site. If we add other sites to the drawing, at a minimum call-sig would traverse the firewall and depending on the location of the callers, all voice traffic may cross the firewall. All of that depends on how you have your call managers/vm/voice gateways designed and where the callers are.

  • Query on Vocie and Data VLan on same Swithc port

    Hi All,
    This is query regarding allowing both Vocie and data Vlans on a single switch port. I knew tehre are different ways to configure and acheive this, but not sure how techncially they are different from each other>
    Way 1:
    interface FastEthernet1/5
    description *** IP Phone/Data Port ***
    switchport trunk native vlan 10
    switchport mode trunk
    switchport voice vlan 16
    no logging event link-status
    no snmp trap link-status
    mls qos trust cos
    spanning-tree portfast
    sh int trunk
    Port      Mode         Encapsulation  Status        Native vlan
    Fa1/5     on           802.1q         trunking      10
    Fa1/7     on           802.1q         trunking      10
    Fa1/12    on           802.1q         trunking      10
    Fa1/13    on           802.1q         trunking      10
    Fa1/14    on           802.1q         trunking      10
    Port      Vlans allowed on trunk
    Fa1/5     1-1005
    Fa1/7     1-1005
    Fa1/12    1-1005
    Fa1/13    1-1005
    Fa1/14    1-1005
    Port      Vlans allowed and active in management domain
    Fa1/5     1,10,16
    Fa1/7     1,10,16
    Fa1/12    1,10,16
    Fa1/13    1,10,16
    Fa1/14    1,10,16
    Port      Vlans in spanning tree forwarding state and not pruned
    Port      Vlans in spanning tree forwarding state and not pruned
    Fa1/5     1,10,16
    Fa1/7     1,10,16
    Fa1/12    1,10,16
    Fa1/13    1,10,16
    Fa1/14    1,10,16
    sh vlan-switch
    VLAN Name                             Status    Ports
    1    default                          active    Fa1/0, Fa1/1, Fa1/2, Fa1/3
                                                    Fa1/4, Fa1/6, Fa1/8, Fa1/9
                                                    Fa1/10, Fa1/11, Fa1/15
    10  DVLAN                            active
    16  VVLAN                            active    Fa1/0, Fa1/1, Fa1/2, Fa1/3
                                                    Fa1/4, Fa1/6, Fa1/8, Fa1/9
                                                    Fa1/10, Fa1/11, Fa1/15
    In the above config, the port Fa 1/5 which is currnetly up and running( this port is ocnencted with IP phoen and a PC)  is not shown in sh vlan-switch output as assigned to vlan 10 or vlan 16. Not sure it is becuase the output was taken from ISR rotuer with NM 16-ESW module .
    sh int fa 1/5 switchp
    Name: Fa1/5
    Switchport: Enabled
    Administrative Mode: trunk
    Operational Mode: trunk
    Administrative Trunking Encapsulation: dot1q
    Operational Trunking Encapsulation: dot1q
    Negotiation of Trunking: Disabled
    Access Mode VLAN: 0 ((Inactive))
    Trunking Native Mode VLAN: 10 (DVLAN)
    Trunking VLANs Enabled: ALL
    Trunking VLANs Active: 1,10,16
    Priority for untagged frames: 0
    Override vlan tag priority: FALSE
    Voice VLAN: 16
    Appliance trust: none
    In above ocnfig, the port is configured as trunk and hence it can carry multiple vlan traffic on swithcport. As IP phones will have inbuilt switch which runs DTP by default and CDP to reciognize the conencted devcies.  I am not sure how this config works as even it's configured as trunk the DTP negotiation is disabled and how phone switch can differentiate the voice frames and data frames. Please explain in loigcal as it's known that as we have confgiured vlan 10 as native and vocie vlan 16 as trunk it carries the voice traffic.
    Way 2:
    interface FastEthernet1/2
    description *** IP Phone/Data Port ***
    switchport access vlan 10
    switchport mode access
    switchport voice vlan 16
    no logging event link-status
    no snmp trap link-status
    mls qos trust cos
    spanning-tree portfast
    In the above config, even the port is access it's carrying multiple vlan traffic despite of being trunk port. Not sure how the trunk will be formed even DTP neogotiation is off. Isi t because of voice vlan command and if so what it deos exactly.  Please can anyone elaborate in detail. Sorry, if my post is big and confusing
    sh int fa 1/2 switchport
    Name: Fa1/2
    Switchport: Enabled
    Administrative Mode: static access
    Operational Mode: static access
    Administrative Trunking Encapsulation: negotiate
    Operational Trunking Encapsulation: native
    Negotiation of Trunking: Off

    Switch - Phone - PC
    1. First question:
         # int f0/1
         # switchport mode access
         # spanning-tree portfast
         # switchport access vlan 50
         # switchport voice vlan 10
    This is the ideal way to configure and in all latest IOS Switches and in latest ISR routers, we do this as the command "switch port voice vlan" command  says to switch port that it carries the voice traffic as tagged and PC as untagged.
    As we all know the default switch port of a switch will be either Dynamic auto or Dynamic Desirable which means DTP is on and in turn it means negotiation of trunking is ON. This is as per my understanding.
    The Sub-Questions for 1st Question are below:
    1  Does the trunk negotiation happen between Access Switch switch port and Mini 3 Port Switch within the IP Phone. If mini switch in IP PHone negotiates to form  trunk based on DTP then what’s the default switch port mode of mini switch in the IP Phone.
    2. As in above config we are no where mentioning the port to be trunk. But it’s still allowing multiple vlan’s traffic to carry on access port. The switchport mode is access when you do “ sh int fa 0/1 swithcport.”.  Is it the swithcport voice vlan command does the magic?
    2. Second Question:
         # int f0/1
         # switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
         # switchport trunk native vlan 10     (data VLAN)
         # switchport mode trunk
         # swichport voice vlan 15
    The Sub-Questions for 2nd Question are below:
    When do we use this configuration.? In my set-up the above config is seen on 2811 ISR routers with NM-16ESW modules.  Can’t we configure the data vlan a switch port access vlan 10 , instead of trunk native vlan.

  • Adtran with voice and data port

    I have an ADTRAN (remote location) with a voice and data port (internet). Does the ethernet port plugs into a serial or ethernet interface?
    The provider is telling me to plugg it into a hub...I've never heard of that and was curious if anyone has implemented this configuration before.

    Options are limited but include.
    1. Get a new SIM card from AT&T and reset your voicemail, see if that helps.
    2. Reset your iPhone (holding down the top button and home button for ~10 seconds until the Apple logo appears on the screen).
    3. Restore your iPhone. If restoring from backup does nothing then next try restore as new and start over.
    4. If nothing else works then call Apple or go to an Apple store and they will replace it.

  • I have a BE6000 server, is it possible to me to make it do a DHCP for both voice and data? Kindly guide me through

    I have a BE6000 server, is it possible for me to make it do a DHCP for both voice and data? Kindly guide me through. Thanks

    CUCM can perform DHCP functions, but it's not meant to replace this functionality from a router or switch, which are the most common places to configure DHCP.
    I assume you'll have at least one of those, why not configure it there??

  • Why does Verizon hide the fact on their network an iPhone cannot deliver simultaneous voice and data

    For me the breaking point was when the local Corporate Store clerk lied to be about their return policy.  He even documented the information he gave me and that didn't matter to management or corporate.  I made a decision to switch to the iPhone and was specifically told I had 30 days to evaluate weather I could make the transition from android to iOS.  If I couldn’t for any reason, I could just return the phone and pay the $35 restocking fee and we were then free to choose from one of the many androids.
    After weeks of challenges and countless hours spent with first tier then second tier then a product specialist we all came to the documented conclusion that the iPhone, on Verizons network could not support data and voice at the same time... Every other smart phone on Verizons network could and always has... the IPhone on ATT's network can support both voice and data at once... but Not On Verizons network...
    Each tech I spoke with seemed shocked and in utter disbelief that this could be so. They blamed ATT for harboring special privileges hold over from their exclusive relationship with Apple.  Which is not true.  Then they blamed Apple for delivering handicapped phones to Verizon on purpose. Well, with an Apple Product Manager on the phone listening in on a Verizon Tech giving me this among other excuses why I could not be on the phone and using google at the same time,  the Apple Rep finally jumped in and very politely cleared up any miss information the Verizon tier 2 support rep was fumbling out.
    So after I had done everything in my power to make the phone work the way I had understood it would.  And had every reason to believe it would.  As did every Verizon rep I spoke with at first until they did a little research and found Verizon had deliberately been hiding this fact from customers.  So I conceded to go back to the Android world for now and let Verizon sort out this glaring deficit hopefully in the near future…  Though every support rep concluded that there was no mention of this being fixed or even a problem so not to hold my breath…
    I couldn’t have been more shocked or infuriated when I went to exchange the “still in the plastic mint condition iPhone” I was told I had to have brought it back in the first 14 days… I pleaded and argued, even directed the manager to the notes entered in verizon’s own support documentation regarding my case and he said “well I see here where you were told that but that rep was wrong”.   That may be so but I based my entire testing and evaluation timeline based on the dates the rep clearly and admittedly told me!   The store manager said there was nothing he could do. 
    Now I mentioned I’m a Network Solutions Provider and being able to be on the phone doing a support call and using my cellular internet at the same time are an absolute must for me to be able to preform my job.  Every Verizon smart phone I have ever owned had been able to do this.  Now I am told I am STUCK in a two year contract with an inadequate  device that I cannot exchange and therefore functionally useless to me. 
    Verizon corporate nor the store manager cared one bit about my position.  They stood behind a little register tape that by signing my credit card receipt I now owed them two more years of my life and now they could care less weather I had a functioning solution or that I had been a loyal customer for over 17 years. Or that I had brought entire small business offices to them for cell services. Just stood there and held a copy of my receipt and said, well  you signed it so here is what it will cost ya to get out of it! 
    He got out a calculator and started running numbers for what I would have to pay to fix this situation… What I would have to pay to even leave Verizon and go get cell service from someone else.  It felt dirty … seedy… like being at some 3rd world used car lot where some shyster had gotten someone wrapped up in a contract and now was going to squeeze the life out of a customer even though they couldn’t’ even deliver the service they implied you were going to get in the first place. 
    In 30 years of being a small business owner I have never encountered an organization that had less integrity or more unscrupulous business practices… 
    I see post after post of Verizon  Customer Support  reps answering threads… funny I haven’t found one where a user honestly thanks the rep for actually helping them out…….  Please Verizon Customer Support, show me you actually can look at a situation and see an equitable solution where a Customer and the Share Holders can both win…..

    Well if this information was as ubiquitous on the web as you suggest, I am puzzled why it took three weeks of troubleshooting with many levels of Verizon support before we collectively concluded this was the situation...
    Regarding Reading what I sign... Thanks for that advice though in this situation I was handed a stylus and told to sign a Signature Pad at the check out counter... ONLY AFTER I signed (for the purchase only)  was I presented with this return policy conveniently nested in a 3 foot long reciept consisting of paragraphs of Helvitica 6 type set info...   I made the assumption that the sales person could correctly  answer a direct question regarding the policy I  inadvertently signed for when authorizing the credit card charge...   Even more concerning is that when by my actions and constant communications with Verizon, my intent was clearly based on the information I had gotten from the sales rep.  and if I was given misinformation it would seem Verizon could show some integrity and support the situation with some equitable solution rather than hiding behind contracts collected from sales staff who do not tell customers the truth..... 
    >> Minor edit <<
    Message was edited by: Verizon Moderator

  • Lack of voice and data at same time is killing me

    after using a treo 750 (WM 6.1) on att for the last three years I guess I didn't realize the benefit of having ATT and gsm in general.  There are plenty of downsides...mainly pricing for single accounts (however their family plan was directly on par with sprint's).  I am constantly trying to use data apps while talking on the phone to no avail.  I started off just thinking I could do without, but a week later, I still really really miss it.  My wife does too...as it is her I am usually giving directions or other web information to while on the phone.  There was nothing like google map's satellite view to help someone verify they are at the right place..."see a large tree on your right with a tall brown building behind it, yep that's the one"   Anyone else have this feeling?  Wifi isn't an option for me most of the time.
    Post relates to: Pre p100eww (Sprint)
    This question was solved.
    View Solution.

    Voice and data simultaneously is not available while using any CDMA network due to network limitations. This is true for all types of phones, not just Palm or not just the Pre. Your example of checking email or using google maps, the gps data may have been stored before activating the call. try browsing the web while making a call, and try to go to a web page you've never visited before, so that you know it can't be a cashed version of the page.

  • Question about voice and data plan for Europe

    I am in New York and my boss is going to France for a week and a half. He told me he will not have access to the internet there. He asked me to find out if it would be possible to get a voice and data plan for the month that he will be there, and if so, could someone show me where I could look at the different plans available?
    If it's not possible to do that for just a month, then could someone tell me where I could find the rates are for voice and data in France?
    Thanks

    Hi kevindrosario,
    I appreciate your interest in our International Services.  France, is a GSM country and will only support a Global capable device. Unfortunately, its not clear if your boss has a Global capable device.  If so, here are the details for the voice and data rates for France.
    If your boss doesn't not have a Global capable device, no worries!  We offer an Occasional Global Traveler program, in which we will loan you a Global device for up to 21 days.  I hope this information is helpful.  Please let me know if you have any any additional questions or concerns.
    Thank you,

  • Cat5e Voice and Data Cabling?

    Somebody  suggested me to use cat5e voice and data cabling for my restaurant so will you advice me that it will be best for me or not?
    http://telephoneguru.net/cabling/

    Cat5e would do fine. But in my opinion Cat6 is the future. If you want to future proof you can also use Cat6. Main difference is speed and interference. I think Cat6 would be costlier than Cat5e.
    Look at here: http://www.diffen.com/difference/Cat5e_vs_Cat6
    But you can use any depending on what your main concern is speed or cost and both would work with data and voice and provide poe as well.
    -Terry
    Please rate all helpful posts

  • Separate 4s voice and data

    Can the iphone 4s separate the voice and data?  It looks like they turn on and off together.  We are in Europe and don't want the data but would like to retain voice calling. Please advise

    Can the iphone 4s separate the voice and data?  It looks like they turn on and off together.  We are in Europe and don't want the data but would like to retain voice calling. Please advise

  • Understanding that the iPhone 5 won't support simultaneous voice and data transmissions over Verizon and Sprint LTE networks will it ever be able to support VoLTE (Voice over LTE)?

    Understanding that the iPhone 5 won’t support simultaneous voice and data transmissions over Verizon LTE network will it ever be able to support VoLTE (Voice over LTE)? Could Apple add VoLTE support later on? It seems pretty clear the MDM9615 chip supports VoLTE but the baseband software by Apple does not. Could Apple add it to the baseband later on? When will Verizon turn-on/enable VoLTE?
    Referral Link: https://discussions.apple.com/message/19614226#19614226

    Well in my research Verizon is already testing Voice Over LTE in select markets via a few news releases, and rumor has it that a few smartphones are already VoLTE ready. http://news.verizonwireless.com/news/2011/02/pr2011-02-09f.html

  • Would Verizon support concurrent voice and data for 4S?

    With the absence of 4G in 4S - this would be at least something to be happy about...

    I would not be that sure, knowing that Thinderbolt could do it over 3G:
    http://phandroid.com/2011/01/26/simultaneous-voice-and-data-over-3g-confirmed-for-htc-thunderbolt/
    Sounds like it should be only a matter of enabling it by the carrier, provided the hw supports it.
    C'mon VZW, I'll even accept partial data speeds!

  • Cannot send SMS when voice and data enabled on 4G

    Iphone 6 on AT&T. When I enable Voice and Data for LTE, I cannot send or receive SMS messages. If I turn off LTE or just enable data over LTE, SMS works.
    I have reset the network setting, disabled iMessages and re-enabled, removed SIM car and replaced it, and restarted the phone. I have not restored the phone from scratch though and would like to avoid that.
    iMessages works fine.
    Any help?

    DavidsMacbook wrote:
    Iphone 6 on AT&T. When I enable Voice and Data for LTE, I cannot send or receive SMS messages. If I turn off LTE or just enable data over LTE, SMS works.
    I have reset the network setting, disabled iMessages and re-enabled, removed SIM car and replaced it, and restarted the phone. I have not restored the phone from scratch though and would like to avoid that.
    SMS is a carrier feature so, th first thing I would do is contact AT&T. There are a number of other threads in the forum about people have issues with AT&T and Voice over LTE, notably Caller ID.

Maybe you are looking for