Connecting iSight to IP address
Just started using iSight, and I have set up my AIM account for video chats. However, how do I set up my iSight to call IP address for video conferencing directly. Teleconferencing has been setup at work, and they communicate via IP addresses, but I can't figure out how to set it up on my PowerBook
PowerMac G4, 15" Mac OS X (10.4.3)
New Discussions ReponsesThe new system for discussions asks that after you mark your question as Solved, you take the time to mark any posts that have aided you with the Helpful tag and the post that provided your answer with the solved tag. This not only gives points to the posters, but points anyone searching for answers to similar problems to the proper posts.
Alternatively, you can change the status to Answered.
If we use the forums properly they will work well...
Ralph
Similar Messages
-
FF connects to several IP addresses on start-up, how to prevent it from happening?
Hi, I am wondering how I can turn Firefox off from connecting to several IP addresses when it starts up?
I have set Firefox to remember my visited web pages/tabs, but to not load until the tab is chosen.
I have also gone through the advices on the following page:
http://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/how-stop-firefox-automatically-making-connections
and have followed it carefully and disabled everything but to no avail.
Also in the about:config I have renamed all Google http(s) links to see if it prevents FF from connecting as some of the IP addresses leads to Google (173.194.32.*), but no success.
A search here on Mozilla or Google gives very little on this particular matter.
I have also disabled all addons but doesn't help.
The only way to prevent FF from connecting with internet is to delete "prefs.js" and "sessionstore.js", but then I loose all history.
I have also used a clean FF installation and taken the "prefs.js" and "sessionstore.js" so to not loose history, but it doesn't help.
Can anyone help me out, thanks!Ok, I have now installed an original version of Firefox 13.0.1, set it up with a basic set of few add-ons for safe browsing being as follow:
* NoScript
* RequestPolicy
* BetterPrivacy
* HTTPS Everywhere
In all cases described below, I browsed to a few pages, afterwards I go to an empty page/tab (about:newtab) before I close the browser, and is set to: "browser.newtabpage.enabled;false" in the hope also a newtab should be empty.
I also followed the instructions under the following link: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/how-stop-firefox-automatically-making-connections
* further on I have disabled a few other things under about:config to stop this "leak", such as webGL, telemetry, rename all google links, etc.
1st test
* I did restart in Off-line mode as described under the link given by jscher2000, when restarting the firewall shows no sign of connection to the internet, not even when I toggle from off-line to on-line.
2nd test
* with all add-ons enabled, I got the following result, see below for the list of IP numbers/info:
* 212.121.101.7 Server Location: Netherlands ISP: Routit BV
* 173.194.32.0 Server Location: Mountain View, CA in United States ISP: Google
* 173.194.32.4 Server Location: Mountain View, CA in United States ISP: Google
* 95.100.4.61 Server Location: Europe ISP: Akamai International B.V.
* 192.150.19.49 Server Location: San Jose, CA in United States ISP: Adobe Systems
* 78.129.207.59 Server Location: United Kingdom ISP: Iomart Hosting Limited
* 69.50.232.54 Server Location: San Jose, CA in United States ISP: Silicon Valley Web Hosting
* 82.103.140.42 Server Location: Denmark ISP: EasySpeedy ApS
3rd test
* I disabled all add-ons and closed browser, and started again, same result as in 2nd test, except that 212.121.101.7 was replaced by
* 37.0.87.7 Server Location: Netherlands ISP: Routit BV .
As this behavior has apparently nothing to do whether it's portable or non-portable version of Firefox, one can assume it has always been like this as at least between all versions from 13.0.1 to 19.0.2, as the portable version 19.0.2 behaves the same way.
Let us not forget another user have experienced apparently the same issue under the following link: http://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/930187
Any more ideas how the browser user can take control over this behavior, or any suggestions what could be wrong? -
Error message when trying to connect to an FTP address
I am trying to connect to an FTP address. When I use Finder > Go> Connect to server... and type in the FTP address I want and click on "connect", I get an error message:
The operation cannot be completed because one or more required items cannot be found (Error code -43)
What could this mean? I automatically get all updates.
Thanks everyone, Mike Storer, Los Angeles.
G-4 tower Mac OS X (10.4.8)This article may help explain the Error -43
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=107032
Even though the article is about connecting to an SMB share, most of it can still hold true when connecting via FTP.
If you haven't yet, you may want to try using a 3rd party FTP application, such as CyberDuck http://www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/macosx/14426
Ben -
TS1559 Wi-Fi settings grayed out or dim and no connection or wi-fi address
Having problems with my Wi-Fi settingsthey appeared grayed out or dim and no connection or wi-fi address. All other Mac devices ( other IPhones, laptops and Ipads are connected} and Ihave never had this problem before.
got it.
the text was confusing to me, talking about other Macs, etc...
I agree, restore, repair or new purchase are the only options I can think of.
tyler39 wrote:
look under the txt jiri, it says he has an iPhone 4s running ios 5.1.1 -
SQL connection using "FREE" IP address
we have a server running CF MX (6.1), making SQL requests to
another server on the network.
The strange thing is, when viewing the active connections on
the SQL server, the CF server is listed using
an unassigned IP address on the CF server.
How does CF choose which IP address it uses for outbound
connections,
where multiple IP addresses are assigned to the NIC?From what you say in your post, it almost sounds like you have to change your Network setting to connect with ethernet for you to get a connection.
The Airport Tab in the Network has to correspond with the type of connection you are using.
It must be highlighted and the green dot showing and drag it to the top of the list.
Then when you travel and use Wireless you can change it back to Airport and connect.
Cheers Don -
I have accidentally deleted my alternate iCloud (email) address. Are there any possibilities to retrieve it back because my iPad is connected to that email address, and now, I can't log out from it on my iPad, because it doesn't exist.
I have alternate icloud email attached to my iPad and I accidentally delete it from appleid.apple.com. And now I can't log out that iCloud account because it doesn't exist and it can't recognize my password.If you mean that Find My Phone is asking for a password to a different Apple ID to your current Apple IDand that ID is a previous version of your current ID, not an entirely different one.
This feature has been introduced to make stolen phones useless to those that have stolen them.
However it can also arise when the user has changed their Apple ID details with Apple and not made the same changes to their iCloud account/Find My Phone on their device before upgrading to iOS 7, or if you restore from a previous back up made before you changed your details and some other circumstances.
The only solution is to change your Apple ID back to its previous state with Apple at My Apple ID using your current password, you don’t need access to this address if it’s previously been used with your Apple ID, once you have saved these details enter the password as requested on your device and then turn off "find my phone" and delete the account from your device. It may take a short while to remove the account.
You should then change your Apple ID back to its current state, save it once again and then log back in using your current Apple ID. Finally, turn "find my phone" back on once again.
This article provides more information about Activation Lock. -
Macbook connecting to apple IP address
I have just recently been teaching myself about network security and as such have been playing around with netstat. Upon using the utility immediately I noticed that I had 2 established connections to apple IP addresses on very high port numbers as seen below. FYI I have updated my macbook from Mountain Lion to Mavericks.
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address (state)
tcp4 0 0 192.168.2.1.56896 17.167.140.46.https ESTABLISHED
tcp4 0 0 192.168.2.1.56893 17.172.232.158.5223 ESTABLISHED
Keep in mind that those connections are established IMMEDIATELY after establishing my internet connection even with no other programs open. I then checked my girlfriend's Snow Leopard macbook and she does not establish any TCP connections when no programs are open.
I am wondering if this is normal behavior for a mac and if its a simple matter of Apple securing a connection to check for software updates or if this is something I can look into. I have read that TCP connections on high port numbers are often suspicious and should be checked out further and I can't find anything online about this being normal mac behaviour.Gonna answer my own question here as I continued to dig and using a couple more option flags discovered it was a apsd process aka apple push notification service daemon. Still... the very high port number that it uses seems suspect to me. Anyone know exactly what XSAN file system is since those port numbers are associated with it and Apple?
-
Jdbc connection set source ip address
Hi
Is there any way to specify the local (source) ip address of a jdbc connection ?
I work in an enterprise environment with firewalls all over, and only certain ip addresses can connected to other ip addresses.
The server which runs my application has many ip addresses and
I'd like to be sure that my ip address is the source...
Thanks
Gabor Dolla
Budapest, HungaryNo, certainly not in the JDBC API. I don't believe there's even a way to do this in the java.net Socket API. There's the very slimmest of slim chances that a particular driver might implement something like this, in which case it would be in the driver's documentation. However, the chances are so slim that I'd bet strongly against any driver doing this.
The source address is usually picked by the operating system, based on the routability to the target IP address. Basically, the OS network services looks at the target IP and says to itself, "which (logical) interface can get there? That's the source IP I will use". If your host's routing says there are multiple routes to the IP, then it will pick one; if there's only one route to the particular IP, there will be only one interface (and therefore source IP) that can be chosen.
There's no reason Java or a driver couldn't be extended to do this, but no particular demand either; the problem is usually dealt with at the network layer. -
Connection statisitics showing local address 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0
Hi,
Slightly new to weblogic, I'm looking at the connection statistic (server/monitoring/channels/protocol). Most connections have the Local Address as the servers IP address, but there are quite a few (20%) that have Local Address 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0
Sorry if it's a noob question, but does anyone know why this is displaying like this, as it doesn't look right. We have two servers in a cluster, and it only happens on one of the servers.http://www.dti.ulaval.ca/webdav/site/sit/shared/Librairie/di/operations/informatique/windows/netstat_results.htm
"If it says 0.0.0.0 on the Local Address column, it means that port is listening on all 'network interfaces' (i.e. your computer, your modem(s) and your network card(s))." -
Mac is not connecting to network systems with names it's only connecting with the IP address why?
Mac is not connecting to network systems with names.
It's only connecting with the IP address why?It sounds like a problem with the domain name server. Be sure you are using the correct DNS in System Preferences > Network, and if you are make sure it is functioning correctly.
Best of luck. -
WAP4410N Connectivity control - Illegal MAC address
I use a WAP4410N in Access Point mode and have it configured to control connectivity via approved MAC addresses.
I have just taken delivery of a Nokia 5800 mobile phone from Three that has a MAC address EC:9B:5B:xx:xx:xx.
When entering the 5800 MAC address in the WAP4410N's connectivity control table I get a popup warning "MAC address must be 12 Hex characters (0-9 and A-F) with optional delimiters (: or -), and the second bit is not a odd number". Although it is given as a "warning" it will not accept the MAC address.
I could of course disable the wifi MAC connectivity control without compromising the security too much, but this would be a last resort.
Is there any way around this?
Would you advise me to return the phone (would be a real hassle!!) because it may give problems in the future on other wifi networks?
If I do return the phone there is no guarantee that the replacement would have a more "standard" MAC address. My wife took delivery of the same phone yesterday, but from Orange. It's MAC address starts 00:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx and has presented no problem. I have lodged queries with both Three and Nokia, but had no response as yet.Update: There was something else wrong with this phone (radio didn't work) so I had to return it to my service provider anyway. The replacement phone had a legal MAC address so all is now well.
I would still be interested in the answers to my questions though if anyone has any wisdom in these matters. -
I recently purchased an iPhone 5c and for some unknown reason I can't connect to my wireless router's network at home. I've tried establishing a seperate IP address, manually adding the iPhone device, and even spent an hour with Centurylink's IT support and they couldn't figure it out. They said it was an iPhone error. I had an iPhone 3 about 1 1/2 years ago that had the same problem. I ended up getting rid of the phone because I couldn't solve this problem before. I thought a newer phone would not have the same problem.
My phone shows that I'm connected to my home internet, but when I open up network information for my home internet there is no IP Address listed. Safari and my other apps also state that I'm not connected to the internet. I'm ready to sell my phone back and go to an Android since I didn't have trouble connecting with it before. We also have a Macbook and iPad that both connect to the internet just fine. Please....oh please help.I was having the same problem; I tried all the recommended fixes in the "more like this" and nothing worked, but finally found the answer. Try this: http://themiddleofthestreet.blogspot.com/2013/11/if-your-iphone-5s-wont-connect- to-wifi.html
-
CAN'T CONNECT-self-assigned IP address
I haven't been able to connect to any networks for days. I keep getting this message in my network control panel under "status":
airport is connected to the network ABC. airport has a self-assigned IP address and may not be able to connect to the internet.
When I start getting this message, it happens to several different networks at once and on 2 different computers. What does this message even mean? That I'm out of reach or that I'm being intentionally blocked?Ok, I have the fix!! After several frustrating days it finally just works.
The process:
Upgrade your Macs to 10.6 (Snow Leopard)
Powercycle your modem AND time capsule / airport TWICE
Reset your time capsule with a pin or paperclip on the back
Follow the prompts to setup your time capsule / airport access
-- On your Macs
Go to System Preferences > Network > Airport > Advanced > TCP/IP
Click "Renew DHCP Lease" then click "Ok"
Click Apply
Turn off Airport
Turn Airport on
IT WORKS!!!
One of the magical people at tech support walked me through it earlier today. The whole process took about 1.5 hrs because Show Leopard takes about an hour to install on one machine.
Hope this helps-
Joshua -
Time Capsule appears to be connected by outside ip address not as local
Hi,
I use connect to server to connect to my time capsule when I am on the road to access files that I don't have with me. It works great but can be a bit slow when downloading large files. It seems that since I upgraded to snow leopard that my time capsule always connects via my cable modems ip address rather than seeing it on the local network. in system preferences under time machine it shows my home ip address under the backup disk name. My wife's macbook pro shows shows time-capsule as the address under the name.
I have not been able to be my computer to backup since i upgraded. It will try all night long and error out. I think it is because it is not seeing it on the local network. has any one else had this problem or know how to over come it?
RyanI wish to have on the capsule iTunes & iPhoto libraries, other documents and have acces to them from both MBPs and phones.
That is possible for your MBPs but not for your iPhones. In addition, you are likely to find its performance with iTunes and iPhoto to be unacceptably slow, to the point of uselessness.
If you really want to, it is possible to configure the Time Capsule join your existing router as a wireless client. In that configuration it will be available to your wireless network as a storage and backup device. It does not strictly need a wired connection to your router. To configure it that way it is best to start with a "hard reset".
It's not worth the effort though, due to the unacceptably slow transfer speed you are likely to achieve. -
Rv220w pptp remote connection use two ip address
Hello, I am a long time quick vpn user. I recently purchased a new windows 8.1 pro and the quickvpn fails. After many searches It appears this is a know issue and I should look for another way to connect. I choose to use the PPTP option. I set it up and everything it going well. however I have one slight issues when I try to use an ip specific software on my system that has remotely made the vpn pptp connection. I ran the cmd and check the ipconfig and see now that my computer has two ip address one from the air card I am using to connect to the internet 192.168.0.192 and one that the pptp vpn connection assigns 10.0.0.21 my issue is for my ip specific software to work I am forced to register both ip address for the same computer and each license from the vendor is good for one computer one ip address so this is going to double my operating cost. can anyone help.
Please let me know if you need more info I will do my best to gather. Thanks in advance.I was able to make a quickvpn connection to my rv220w router via a wifi connection. I am unsure of the exact change made and I am now wondering if anyone can review this log and tell me what happened to allow the connection. At first I was very taken back and had to triple check to make sure it was working. Below is today’s router log at 18:00 I was able to make a successful quickvpn connection. Anyone see how? The rest of the morning I was trying repeatedly to make a connection
is this important? "
2014-02-01 19:04:31: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Ignoring request for negotiation to 166.142.243.242 as Local is configured as Responder.
2000-01-01 00:00:36: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IKE started
2014-02-01 12:47:49: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Adding IPSec configuration with identifier "joey01"
2014-02-01 12:47:49: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Adding IKE configuration with identifier "joey01"
2014-02-01 12:47:59: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Configuration found for 166.155.0.67[500].
2014-02-01 12:47:59: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received request for new phase 1 negotiation: 192.168.0.10[500]<=>166.155.0.67[500]
2014-02-01 12:47:59: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Beginning Identity Protection mode.
2014-02-01 12:47:59: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received Vendor ID: MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY
2014-02-01 12:47:59: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 12:47:59: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2014-02-01 12:47:59: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 12:48:00: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: For 166.155.0.67[500], Selected NAT-T version: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2014-02-01 12:48:00: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 192.168.0.10[500]
2014-02-01 12:48:00: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT-D payload matches for 166.155.0.67[500]
2014-02-01 12:48:00: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT detected: ME
2014-02-01 12:48:00: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Floating ports for NAT-T with peer 166.155.0.67[4500]
2014-02-01 12:48:00: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: ISAKMP-SA established for 192.168.0.10[4500]-166.155.0.67[4500] with spi:3671b391a56b4bee:52b561ece6e2aa09
2014-02-01 12:48:00: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Sending Informational Exchange: notify payload[INITIAL-CONTACT]
2014-02-01 12:48:00: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Responding to new phase 2 negotiation: 192.168.0.10[0]<=>166.155.0.67[0]
2014-02-01 12:48:00: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Using IPsec SA configuration: 10.0.0.0/8<->166.155.0.67/32
2014-02-01 12:48:00: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Adjusting peer's encmode 61443(61443)->Tunnel(1)
2014-02-01 12:48:01: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 166.155.0.67->192.168.0.10 with spi=266310588(0xfdf93bc)
2014-02-01 12:48:01: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 192.168.0.10->166.155.0.67 with spi=3530213431(0xd26ac837)
2014-02-01 12:49:19: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Purged ISAKMP-SA with proto_id=ISAKMP and spi=3671b391a56b4bee:52b561ece6e2aa09.
2014-02-01 12:49:20: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: ISAKMP-SA deleted for 192.168.0.10[4500]-166.155.0.67[4500] with spi:3671b391a56b4bee:52b561ece6e2aa09
2014-02-01 13:36:02: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA expired: ESP/Tunnel 192.168.0.10->166.155.0.67 with spi=3530213431(0xd26ac837)
2014-02-01 13:36:02: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA expired: ESP/Tunnel 166.155.0.67->192.168.0.10 with spi=266310588(0xfdf93bc)
2014-02-01 13:46:50: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Configuration found for 166.155.0.67[4500].
2014-02-01 13:46:50: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Ports floated, peer initiatedcommunication on 4500
2014-02-01 13:46:50: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received request for new phase 1 negotiation: 192.168.0.10[4500]<=>166.155.0.67[4500]
2014-02-01 13:46:50: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Beginning Identity Protection mode.
2014-02-01 13:46:50: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received Vendor ID: MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY
2014-02-01 13:46:50: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 13:46:50: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2014-02-01 13:46:50: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 13:46:50: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: For 166.155.0.67[4500], Selected NAT-T version: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2014-02-01 13:46:50: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 192.168.0.10[4500]
2014-02-01 13:46:50: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT-D payload matches for 166.155.0.67[4500]
2014-02-01 13:46:50: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT detected: ME
2014-02-01 13:46:50: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: ISAKMP-SA established for 192.168.0.10[4500]-166.155.0.67[4500] with spi:1d7d95d359ea4f66:d71a5efcd843af68
2014-02-01 13:46:50: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Sending Informational Exchange: notify payload[INITIAL-CONTACT]
2014-02-01 13:46:51: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Responding to new phase 2 negotiation: 192.168.0.10[0]<=>166.155.0.67[0]
2014-02-01 13:46:51: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Using IPsec SA configuration: 10.0.0.0/8<->166.155.0.67/32
2014-02-01 13:46:51: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Adjusting peer's encmode 61443(61443)->Tunnel(1)
2014-02-01 13:46:51: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 166.155.0.67->192.168.0.10 with spi=225127593(0xd6b2ca9)
2014-02-01 13:46:51: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 192.168.0.10->166.155.0.67 with spi=1534791298(0x5b7b0e82)
2014-02-01 13:48:34: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Purged ISAKMP-SA with proto_id=ISAKMP and spi=1d7d95d359ea4f66:d71a5efcd843af68.
2014-02-01 13:48:35: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: ISAKMP-SA deleted for 192.168.0.10[4500]-166.155.0.67[4500] with spi:1d7d95d359ea4f66:d71a5efcd843af68
2014-02-01 14:34:01: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Adding IPSec configuration with identifier "alohavpn"
2014-02-01 14:34:01: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Adding IKE configuration with identifier "alohavpn"
2014-02-01 14:34:06: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Using IPsec SA configuration: 10.0.0.250/8<->166.142.243.242/30
2014-02-01 14:34:06: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Configuration found for 166.142.243.242.
2014-02-01 14:34:06: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Initiating new phase 1 negotiation: 192.168.0.10[500]<=>166.142.243.242[500]
2014-02-01 14:34:06: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Beginning Identity Protection mode.
2014-02-01 14:34:06: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: [ident_i1send:180]: XXX: NUMNATTVENDORIDS: 3
2014-02-01 14:34:06: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: [ident_i1send:184]: XXX: setting vendorid: 4
2014-02-01 14:34:06: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: [ident_i1send:184]: XXX: setting vendorid: 8
2014-02-01 14:34:06: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: [ident_i1send:184]: XXX: setting vendorid: 9
2014-02-01 14:34:27: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: accept a request to establish IKE-SA: 166.142.243.242
2014-02-01 14:34:27: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Configuration found for 166.142.243.242.
2014-02-01 14:34:37: [rv220w][IKE] ERROR: Phase 2 negotiation failed due to time up waiting for phase1. ESP 166.142.243.242->192.168.0.10
2014-02-01 14:34:52: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA expired: ESP/Tunnel 192.168.0.10->166.155.0.67 with spi=1534791298(0x5b7b0e82)
2014-02-01 14:34:52: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA expired: ESP/Tunnel 166.155.0.67->192.168.0.10 with spi=225127593(0xd6b2ca9)
2014-02-01 14:34:58: [rv220w][IKE] ERROR: Invalid SA protocol type: 0
2014-02-01 14:34:58: [rv220w][IKE] ERROR: Phase 2 negotiation failed due to time up waiting for phase1.
2014-02-01 14:35:06: [rv220w][IKE] ERROR: Phase 1 negotiation failed due to time up for 166.142.243.242[500]. a8c862e86c5d65ea:0000000000000000
2014-02-01 14:35:18: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Using IPsec SA configuration: 10.0.0.250/8<->166.142.243.242/30
2014-02-01 14:35:18: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Configuration found for 166.142.243.242.
2014-02-01 14:35:18: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Initiating new phase 1 negotiation: 192.168.0.10[500]<=>166.142.243.242[500]
2014-02-01 14:35:18: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Beginning Identity Protection mode.
2014-02-01 14:35:18: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: [ident_i1send:180]: XXX: NUMNATTVENDORIDS: 3
2014-02-01 14:35:18: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: [ident_i1send:184]: XXX: setting vendorid: 4
2014-02-01 14:35:18: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: [ident_i1send:184]: XXX: setting vendorid: 8
2014-02-01 14:35:18: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: [ident_i1send:184]: XXX: setting vendorid: 9
2014-02-01 14:35:29: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: an undead schedule has been deleted: 'isakmp_chkph1there'.
2014-02-01 14:35:29: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPSec configuration with identifier "alohavpn" deleted sucessfully
2014-02-01 14:35:29: [rv220w][IKE] WARNING: no phase2 bounded.
2014-02-01 14:35:29: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Purged ISAKMP-SA with spi=44ad4081d881ca39:0000000000000000.
2014-02-01 14:35:29: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: an undead schedule has been deleted: 'purge_remote'.
2014-02-01 14:35:29: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: an undead schedule has been deleted: 'isakmp_ph1resend'.
2014-02-01 14:35:29: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IKE configuration with identifier "alohavpn" deleted sucessfully
2014-02-01 14:45:36: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Configuration found for 166.155.0.67[4500].
2014-02-01 14:45:36: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Ports floated, peer initiatedcommunication on 4500
2014-02-01 14:45:36: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received request for new phase 1 negotiation: 192.168.0.10[4500]<=>166.155.0.67[4500]
2014-02-01 14:45:36: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Beginning Identity Protection mode.
2014-02-01 14:45:36: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received Vendor ID: MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY
2014-02-01 14:45:36: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 14:45:36: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2014-02-01 14:45:36: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 14:45:36: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: For 166.155.0.67[4500], Selected NAT-T version: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2014-02-01 14:45:37: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 192.168.0.10[4500]
2014-02-01 14:45:37: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT-D payload matches for 166.155.0.67[4500]
2014-02-01 14:45:37: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT detected: ME
2014-02-01 14:45:37: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: ISAKMP-SA established for 192.168.0.10[4500]-166.155.0.67[4500] with spi:e7ff5eebc74fe18e:26a523a055bdd961
2014-02-01 14:45:37: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Sending Informational Exchange: notify payload[INITIAL-CONTACT]
2014-02-01 14:45:37: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Responding to new phase 2 negotiation: 192.168.0.10[0]<=>166.155.0.67[0]
2014-02-01 14:45:37: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Using IPsec SA configuration: 10.0.0.0/8<->166.155.0.67/32
2014-02-01 14:45:37: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Adjusting peer's encmode 61443(61443)->Tunnel(1)
2014-02-01 14:45:38: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 166.155.0.67->192.168.0.10 with spi=233645680(0xded2670)
2014-02-01 14:45:38: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 192.168.0.10->166.155.0.67 with spi=3473253380(0xcf05a404)
2014-02-01 14:47:04: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Purged ISAKMP-SA with proto_id=ISAKMP and spi=e7ff5eebc74fe18e:26a523a055bdd961.
2014-02-01 14:47:05: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: ISAKMP-SA deleted for 192.168.0.10[4500]-166.155.0.67[4500] with spi:e7ff5eebc74fe18e:26a523a055bdd961
2014-02-01 14:49:00: [rv220w][IKE] ERROR: Could not find configuration for 99.120.21.158[500]
2014-02-01 14:49:01: [rv220w][IKE] ERROR: Could not find configuration for 99.120.21.158[500]
2014-02-01 14:49:03: [rv220w][IKE] ERROR: Could not find configuration for 99.120.21.158[500]
2014-02-01 14:49:07: [rv220w][IKE] ERROR: Could not find configuration for 99.120.21.158[500]
2014-02-01 14:49:42: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Adding IPSec configuration with identifier "tim000"
2014-02-01 14:49:42: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Adding IKE configuration with identifier "tim000"
2014-02-01 14:49:44: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Configuration found for 99.120.21.158[500].
2014-02-01 14:49:44: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received request for new phase 1 negotiation: 192.168.0.10[500]<=>99.120.21.158[500]
2014-02-01 14:49:44: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Beginning Identity Protection mode.
2014-02-01 14:49:44: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received Vendor ID: MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY
2014-02-01 14:49:44: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 14:49:44: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2014-02-01 14:49:44: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 14:49:44: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: For 99.120.21.158[500], Selected NAT-T version: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2014-02-01 14:49:44: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 192.168.0.10[500]
2014-02-01 14:49:44: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 99.120.21.158[500]
2014-02-01 14:49:44: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT detected: ME PEER
2014-02-01 14:49:44: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Floating ports for NAT-T with peer 99.120.21.158[4500]
2014-02-01 14:49:44: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: ISAKMP-SA established for 192.168.0.10[4500]-99.120.21.158[4500] with spi:c37856d7496f4bc0:d866a785808f18ff
2014-02-01 14:49:44: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Sending Informational Exchange: notify payload[INITIAL-CONTACT]
2014-02-01 14:49:45: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Responding to new phase 2 negotiation: 192.168.0.10[0]<=>99.120.21.158[0]
2014-02-01 14:49:45: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Using IPsec SA configuration: 10.0.0.0/8<->192.168.1.68/32
2014-02-01 14:49:45: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Adjusting peer's encmode 61443(61443)->Tunnel(1)
2014-02-01 14:49:45: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 99.120.21.158->192.168.0.10 with spi=201496659(0xc029853)
2014-02-01 14:49:45: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 192.168.0.10->99.120.21.158 with spi=3623586341(0xd7fb8a25)
2014-02-01 14:51:02: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Purged ISAKMP-SA with proto_id=ISAKMP and spi=c37856d7496f4bc0:d866a785808f18ff.
2014-02-01 14:51:03: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: ISAKMP-SA deleted for 192.168.0.10[4500]-99.120.21.158[4500] with spi:c37856d7496f4bc0:d866a785808f18ff
2014-02-01 15:33:39: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA expired: ESP/Tunnel 192.168.0.10->166.155.0.67 with spi=3473253380(0xcf05a404)
2014-02-01 15:33:39: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA expired: ESP/Tunnel 166.155.0.67->192.168.0.10 with spi=233645680(0xded2670)
2014-02-01 15:37:46: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA expired: ESP/Tunnel 192.168.0.10->99.120.21.158 with spi=3623586341(0xd7fb8a25)
2014-02-01 15:37:46: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA expired: ESP/Tunnel 99.120.21.158->192.168.0.10 with spi=201496659(0xc029853)
2014-02-01 15:38:35: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Adding IPSec configuration with identifier "happy00"
2014-02-01 15:38:35: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Adding IKE configuration with identifier "happy00"
2014-02-01 15:38:55: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Using IPsec SA configuration: 10.0.0.0/8<->166.142.243.242/32
2014-02-01 15:38:55: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Configuration found for 166.142.243.242.
2014-02-01 15:38:55: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Ignoring request for negotiation to 166.142.243.242 as Local is configured as Responder.
2014-02-01 15:40:28: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPSec configuration with identifier "happy00" deleted sucessfully
2014-02-01 15:40:28: [rv220w][IKE] WARNING: no phase1 found for "happy00"
2014-02-01 15:40:28: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IKE configuration with identifier "happy00" deleted sucessfully
2014-02-01 15:40:28: [rv220w][IKE] ERROR: sainfo identifier not found ("happy00")
2014-02-01 15:40:28: [rv220w][IKE] ERROR: Failed to Delete the IPSec configuration with identifier "happy00"
2014-02-01 15:40:28: [rv220w][IKE] ERROR: remote identifier not found ("")
2014-02-01 15:40:28: [rv220w][IKE] ERROR: Failed to Delete the IKE configuration with identifier ""
2014-02-01 15:40:47: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Adding IPSec configuration with identifier "happy00"
2014-02-01 15:40:47: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Adding IKE configuration with identifier "happy00"
2014-02-01 15:40:55: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Using IPsec SA configuration: 10.0.0.0/8<->166.142.243.242/32
2014-02-01 15:40:55: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Configuration found for 166.142.243.242.
2014-02-01 15:40:55: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Ignoring request for negotiation to 166.142.243.242 as Local is configured as Responder.
2014-02-01 15:44:52: [rv220w][IKE] WARNING: no phase2 found for "joey01"
2014-02-01 15:44:52: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPSec configuration with identifier "joey01" deleted sucessfully
2014-02-01 15:44:52: [rv220w][IKE] WARNING: no phase1 found for "joey01"
2014-02-01 15:44:52: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IKE configuration with identifier "joey01" deleted sucessfully
2014-02-01 15:44:52: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Adding IPSec configuration with identifier "joey01"
2014-02-01 15:44:52: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Adding IKE configuration with identifier "joey01"
2014-02-01 15:45:02: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Configuration found for 166.155.0.67[500].
2014-02-01 15:45:02: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received request for new phase 1 negotiation: 192.168.0.10[500]<=>166.155.0.67[500]
2014-02-01 15:45:02: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Beginning Identity Protection mode.
2014-02-01 15:45:02: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received Vendor ID: MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY
2014-02-01 15:45:02: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 15:45:02: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2014-02-01 15:45:02: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 15:45:02: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: For 166.155.0.67[500], Selected NAT-T version: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2014-02-01 15:45:03: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 192.168.0.10[500]
2014-02-01 15:45:03: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT-D payload matches for 166.155.0.67[500]
2014-02-01 15:45:03: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT detected: ME
2014-02-01 15:45:03: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Floating ports for NAT-T with peer 166.155.0.67[4500]
2014-02-01 15:45:03: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: ISAKMP-SA established for 192.168.0.10[4500]-166.155.0.67[4500] with spi:26214a2b8fde97de:0f3107405c30ec29
2014-02-01 15:45:03: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Sending Informational Exchange: notify payload[INITIAL-CONTACT]
2014-02-01 15:45:03: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Responding to new phase 2 negotiation: 192.168.0.10[0]<=>166.155.0.67[0]
2014-02-01 15:45:03: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Using IPsec SA configuration: 10.0.0.0/8<->166.155.0.67/32
2014-02-01 15:45:03: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Adjusting peer's encmode 61443(61443)->Tunnel(1)
2014-02-01 15:45:04: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 166.155.0.67->192.168.0.10 with spi=171519328(0xa392d60)
2014-02-01 15:45:04: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 192.168.0.10->166.155.0.67 with spi=995888774(0x3b5c0e86)
2014-02-01 15:46:19: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Purged ISAKMP-SA with proto_id=ISAKMP and spi=26214a2b8fde97de:0f3107405c30ec29.
2014-02-01 15:46:20: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: ISAKMP-SA deleted for 192.168.0.10[4500]-166.155.0.67[4500] with spi:26214a2b8fde97de:0f3107405c30ec29
2014-02-01 15:47:22: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPSec configuration with identifier "happy00" deleted sucessfully
2014-02-01 15:47:22: [rv220w][IKE] WARNING: no phase1 found for "happy00"
2014-02-01 15:47:22: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IKE configuration with identifier "happy00" deleted sucessfully
2014-02-01 15:47:22: [rv220w][IKE] ERROR: sainfo identifier not found ("happy00")
2014-02-01 15:47:22: [rv220w][IKE] ERROR: Failed to Delete the IPSec configuration with identifier "happy00"
2014-02-01 15:47:22: [rv220w][IKE] ERROR: remote identifier not found ("")
2014-02-01 15:47:22: [rv220w][IKE] ERROR: Failed to Delete the IKE configuration with identifier ""
2014-02-01 15:48:37: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Configuration found for 99.120.21.158[4500].
2014-02-01 15:48:37: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Ports floated, peer initiatedcommunication on 4500
2014-02-01 15:48:37: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received request for new phase 1 negotiation: 192.168.0.10[4500]<=>99.120.21.158[4500]
2014-02-01 15:48:37: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Beginning Identity Protection mode.
2014-02-01 15:48:37: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received Vendor ID: MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY
2014-02-01 15:48:37: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 15:48:37: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2014-02-01 15:48:37: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 15:48:37: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: For 99.120.21.158[4500], Selected NAT-T version: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2014-02-01 15:48:37: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 192.168.0.10[4500]
2014-02-01 15:48:37: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 99.120.21.158[4500]
2014-02-01 15:48:37: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT detected: ME PEER
2014-02-01 15:48:37: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: ISAKMP-SA established for 192.168.0.10[4500]-99.120.21.158[4500] with spi:95b646cb75adbb50:0ed9f31398ea14aa
2014-02-01 15:48:37: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Sending Informational Exchange: notify payload[INITIAL-CONTACT]
2014-02-01 15:48:37: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Responding to new phase 2 negotiation: 192.168.0.10[0]<=>99.120.21.158[0]
2014-02-01 15:48:37: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Using IPsec SA configuration: 10.0.0.0/8<->192.168.1.68/32
2014-02-01 15:48:37: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Adjusting peer's encmode 61443(61443)->Tunnel(1)
2014-02-01 15:48:38: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 99.120.21.158->192.168.0.10 with spi=254599107(0xf2cdfc3)
2014-02-01 15:48:38: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 192.168.0.10->99.120.21.158 with spi=2917092721(0xaddf4d71)
2014-02-01 15:50:17: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Purged ISAKMP-SA with proto_id=ISAKMP and spi=95b646cb75adbb50:0ed9f31398ea14aa.
2014-02-01 15:50:18: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: ISAKMP-SA deleted for 192.168.0.10[4500]-99.120.21.158[4500] with spi:95b646cb75adbb50:0ed9f31398ea14aa
2014-02-01 15:50:23: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Adding IPSec configuration with identifier "happy00"
2014-02-01 15:50:23: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Adding IKE configuration with identifier "happy00"
2014-02-01 15:50:39: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Using IPsec SA configuration: 10.0.0.0/8<->166.142.243.242/32
2014-02-01 15:50:39: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Configuration found for 166.142.243.242.
2014-02-01 15:50:39: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Ignoring request for negotiation to 166.142.243.242 as Local is configured as Responder.
2014-02-01 15:51:12: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPSec configuration with identifier "happy00" deleted sucessfully
2014-02-01 15:51:12: [rv220w][IKE] WARNING: no phase1 found for "happy00"
2014-02-01 15:51:12: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IKE configuration with identifier "happy00" deleted sucessfully
2014-02-01 15:51:12: [rv220w][IKE] ERROR: sainfo identifier not found ("happy00")
2014-02-01 15:51:12: [rv220w][IKE] ERROR: Failed to Delete the IPSec configuration with identifier "happy00"
2014-02-01 15:51:12: [rv220w][IKE] ERROR: remote identifier not found ("")
2014-02-01 15:51:12: [rv220w][IKE] ERROR: Failed to Delete the IKE configuration with identifier ""
2014-02-01 16:33:05: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA expired: ESP/Tunnel 192.168.0.10->166.155.0.67 with spi=995888774(0x3b5c0e86)
2014-02-01 16:33:05: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA expired: ESP/Tunnel 166.155.0.67->192.168.0.10 with spi=171519328(0xa392d60)
2014-02-01 16:36:39: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA expired: ESP/Tunnel 192.168.0.10->99.120.21.158 with spi=2917092721(0xaddf4d71)
2014-02-01 16:36:39: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA expired: ESP/Tunnel 99.120.21.158->192.168.0.10 with spi=254599107(0xf2cdfc3)
2014-02-01 16:43:50: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Configuration found for 166.155.0.67[4500].
2014-02-01 16:43:50: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Ports floated, peer initiatedcommunication on 4500
2014-02-01 16:43:50: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received request for new phase 1 negotiation: 192.168.0.10[4500]<=>166.155.0.67[4500]
2014-02-01 16:43:50: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Beginning Identity Protection mode.
2014-02-01 16:43:50: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received Vendor ID: MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY
2014-02-01 16:43:50: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 16:43:50: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2014-02-01 16:43:50: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 16:43:50: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: For 166.155.0.67[4500], Selected NAT-T version: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2014-02-01 16:43:50: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 192.168.0.10[4500]
2014-02-01 16:43:50: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT-D payload matches for 166.155.0.67[4500]
2014-02-01 16:43:50: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT detected: ME
2014-02-01 16:43:50: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: ISAKMP-SA established for 192.168.0.10[4500]-166.155.0.67[4500] with spi:6a803bd2c559ba70:d005a2ba6e84b619
2014-02-01 16:43:50: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Sending Informational Exchange: notify payload[INITIAL-CONTACT]
2014-02-01 16:43:50: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Responding to new phase 2 negotiation: 192.168.0.10[0]<=>166.155.0.67[0]
2014-02-01 16:43:50: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Using IPsec SA configuration: 10.0.0.0/8<->166.155.0.67/32
2014-02-01 16:43:50: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Adjusting peer's encmode 61443(61443)->Tunnel(1)
2014-02-01 16:43:51: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 166.155.0.67->192.168.0.10 with spi=98566123(0x5dfffeb)
2014-02-01 16:43:51: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 192.168.0.10->166.155.0.67 with spi=3231695043(0xc09fc0c3)
2014-02-01 16:45:28: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Purged ISAKMP-SA with proto_id=ISAKMP and spi=6a803bd2c559ba70:d005a2ba6e84b619.
2014-02-01 16:45:29: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: ISAKMP-SA deleted for 192.168.0.10[4500]-166.155.0.67[4500] with spi:6a803bd2c559ba70:d005a2ba6e84b619
2014-02-01 16:47:29: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Configuration found for 99.120.21.158[4500].
2014-02-01 16:47:29: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Ports floated, peer initiatedcommunication on 4500
2014-02-01 16:47:29: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received request for new phase 1 negotiation: 192.168.0.10[4500]<=>99.120.21.158[4500]
2014-02-01 16:47:29: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Beginning Identity Protection mode.
2014-02-01 16:47:29: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received Vendor ID: MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY
2014-02-01 16:47:29: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 16:47:29: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2014-02-01 16:47:29: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 16:47:29: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: For 99.120.21.158[4500], Selected NAT-T version: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2014-02-01 16:47:29: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 192.168.0.10[4500]
2014-02-01 16:47:29: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 99.120.21.158[4500]
2014-02-01 16:47:29: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT detected: ME PEER
2014-02-01 16:47:29: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: ISAKMP-SA established for 192.168.0.10[4500]-99.120.21.158[4500] with spi:6852c876e1425084:944da52b84937c9a
2014-02-01 16:47:29: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Sending Informational Exchange: notify payload[INITIAL-CONTACT]
2014-02-01 16:47:29: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Responding to new phase 2 negotiation: 192.168.0.10[0]<=>99.120.21.158[0]
2014-02-01 16:47:29: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Using IPsec SA configuration: 10.0.0.0/8<->192.168.1.68/32
2014-02-01 16:47:30: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Adjusting peer's encmode 61443(61443)->Tunnel(1)
2014-02-01 16:47:30: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 99.120.21.158->192.168.0.10 with spi=103279842(0x627ece2)
2014-02-01 16:47:30: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 192.168.0.10->99.120.21.158 with spi=2492252444(0x948cc11c)
2014-02-01 16:48:47: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Purged ISAKMP-SA with proto_id=ISAKMP and spi=6852c876e1425084:944da52b84937c9a.
2014-02-01 16:48:48: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: ISAKMP-SA deleted for 192.168.0.10[4500]-99.120.21.158[4500] with spi:6852c876e1425084:944da52b84937c9a
2014-02-01 17:31:52: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA expired: ESP/Tunnel 192.168.0.10->166.155.0.67 with spi=3231695043(0xc09fc0c3)
2014-02-01 17:31:52: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA expired: ESP/Tunnel 166.155.0.67->192.168.0.10 with spi=98566123(0x5dfffeb)
2014-02-01 17:35:31: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA expired: ESP/Tunnel 192.168.0.10->99.120.21.158 with spi=2492252444(0x948cc11c)
2014-02-01 17:35:31: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA expired: ESP/Tunnel 99.120.21.158->192.168.0.10 with spi=103279842(0x627ece2)
2014-02-01 17:42:40: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Configuration found for 166.155.0.67[4500].
2014-02-01 17:42:40: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Ports floated, peer initiatedcommunication on 4500
2014-02-01 17:42:40: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received request for new phase 1 negotiation: 192.168.0.10[4500]<=>166.155.0.67[4500]
2014-02-01 17:42:40: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Beginning Identity Protection mode.
2014-02-01 17:42:40: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received Vendor ID: MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY
2014-02-01 17:42:40: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 17:42:40: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2014-02-01 17:42:40: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 17:42:40: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: For 166.155.0.67[4500], Selected NAT-T version: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2014-02-01 17:42:40: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 192.168.0.10[4500]
2014-02-01 17:42:40: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT-D payload matches for 166.155.0.67[4500]
2014-02-01 17:42:40: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT detected: ME
2014-02-01 17:42:41: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: ISAKMP-SA established for 192.168.0.10[4500]-166.155.0.67[4500] with spi:610f4e8b8a701292:1b5b4fac9129d2cc
2014-02-01 17:42:41: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Sending Informational Exchange: notify payload[INITIAL-CONTACT]
2014-02-01 17:42:41: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Responding to new phase 2 negotiation: 192.168.0.10[0]<=>166.155.0.67[0]
2014-02-01 17:42:41: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Using IPsec SA configuration: 10.0.0.0/8<->166.155.0.67/32
2014-02-01 17:42:41: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Adjusting peer's encmode 61443(61443)->Tunnel(1)
2014-02-01 17:42:41: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 166.155.0.67->192.168.0.10 with spi=5442197(0x530a95)
2014-02-01 17:42:41: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 192.168.0.10->166.155.0.67 with spi=281087573(0x10c10e55)
2014-02-01 17:43:58: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Purged ISAKMP-SA with proto_id=ISAKMP and spi=610f4e8b8a701292:1b5b4fac9129d2cc.
2014-02-01 17:43:59: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: ISAKMP-SA deleted for 192.168.0.10[4500]-166.155.0.67[4500] with spi:610f4e8b8a701292:1b5b4fac9129d2cc
2014-02-01 17:46:24: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Configuration found for 99.120.21.158[4500].
2014-02-01 17:46:24: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Ports floated, peer initiatedcommunication on 4500
2014-02-01 17:46:24: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received request for new phase 1 negotiation: 192.168.0.10[4500]<=>99.120.21.158[4500]
2014-02-01 17:46:24: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Beginning Identity Protection mode.
2014-02-01 17:46:24: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received Vendor ID: MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY
2014-02-01 17:46:24: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 17:46:24: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2014-02-01 17:46:24: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 17:46:24: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: For 99.120.21.158[4500], Selected NAT-T version: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2014-02-01 17:46:24: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 192.168.0.10[4500]
2014-02-01 17:46:24: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 99.120.21.158[4500]
2014-02-01 17:46:24: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT detected: ME PEER
2014-02-01 17:46:25: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: ISAKMP-SA established for 192.168.0.10[4500]-99.120.21.158[4500] with spi:34fbdc2521b83861:4f04939eefba3853
2014-02-01 17:46:25: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Sending Informational Exchange: notify payload[INITIAL-CONTACT]
2014-02-01 17:46:25: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Responding to new phase 2 negotiation: 192.168.0.10[0]<=>99.120.21.158[0]
2014-02-01 17:46:25: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Using IPsec SA configuration: 10.0.0.0/8<->192.168.1.68/32
2014-02-01 17:46:25: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Adjusting peer's encmode 61443(61443)->Tunnel(1)
2014-02-01 17:46:25: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 99.120.21.158->192.168.0.10 with spi=232320279(0xdd8ed17)
2014-02-01 17:46:25: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 192.168.0.10->99.120.21.158 with spi=2789259203(0xa640b7c3)
2014-02-01 17:48:02: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Purged ISAKMP-SA with proto_id=ISAKMP and spi=34fbdc2521b83861:4f04939eefba3853.
2014-02-01 17:48:03: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: ISAKMP-SA deleted for 192.168.0.10[4500]-99.120.21.158[4500] with spi:34fbdc2521b83861:4f04939eefba3853
2014-02-01 18:30:42: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA expired: ESP/Tunnel 192.168.0.10->166.155.0.67 with spi=281087573(0x10c10e55)
2014-02-01 18:30:42: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA expired: ESP/Tunnel 166.155.0.67->192.168.0.10 with spi=5442197(0x530a95)
2014-02-01 18:34:26: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA expired: ESP/Tunnel 192.168.0.10->99.120.21.158 with spi=2789259203(0xa640b7c3)
2014-02-01 18:34:26: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA expired: ESP/Tunnel 99.120.21.158->192.168.0.10 with spi=232320279(0xdd8ed17)
2014-02-01 18:41:21: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Configuration found for 166.155.0.67[4500].
2014-02-01 18:41:21: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Ports floated, peer initiatedcommunication on 4500
2014-02-01 18:41:21: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received request for new phase 1 negotiation: 192.168.0.10[4500]<=>166.155.0.67[4500]
2014-02-01 18:41:21: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Beginning Identity Protection mode.
2014-02-01 18:41:21: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received Vendor ID: MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY
2014-02-01 18:41:21: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 18:41:21: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2014-02-01 18:41:21: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 18:41:21: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: For 166.155.0.67[4500], Selected NAT-T version: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2014-02-01 18:41:21: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 192.168.0.10[4500]
2014-02-01 18:41:21: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT-D payload matches for 166.155.0.67[4500]
2014-02-01 18:41:21: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT detected: ME
2014-02-01 18:41:22: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: ISAKMP-SA established for 192.168.0.10[4500]-166.155.0.67[4500] with spi:11605c3a8435559f:38b8c86ef5bc8173
2014-02-01 18:41:22: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Sending Informational Exchange: notify payload[INITIAL-CONTACT]
2014-02-01 18:41:22: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Responding to new phase 2 negotiation: 192.168.0.10[0]<=>166.155.0.67[0]
2014-02-01 18:41:22: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Using IPsec SA configuration: 10.0.0.0/8<->166.155.0.67/32
2014-02-01 18:41:22: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Adjusting peer's encmode 61443(61443)->Tunnel(1)
2014-02-01 18:41:22: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 166.155.0.67->192.168.0.10 with spi=116125724(0x6ebf01c)
2014-02-01 18:41:22: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 192.168.0.10->166.155.0.67 with spi=712542982(0x2a788b06)
2014-02-01 18:43:05: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Purged ISAKMP-SA with proto_id=ISAKMP and spi=11605c3a8435559f:38b8c86ef5bc8173.
2014-02-01 18:43:06: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: ISAKMP-SA deleted for 192.168.0.10[4500]-166.155.0.67[4500] with spi:11605c3a8435559f:38b8c86ef5bc8173
2014-02-01 18:45:11: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Configuration found for 99.120.21.158[4500].
2014-02-01 18:45:11: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Ports floated, peer initiatedcommunication on 4500
2014-02-01 18:45:11: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received request for new phase 1 negotiation: 192.168.0.10[4500]<=>99.120.21.158[4500]
2014-02-01 18:45:11: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Beginning Identity Protection mode.
2014-02-01 18:45:11: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received Vendor ID: MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY
2014-02-01 18:45:11: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 18:45:11: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2014-02-01 18:45:11: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 18:45:11: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: For 99.120.21.158[4500], Selected NAT-T version: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2014-02-01 18:45:11: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 192.168.0.10[4500]
2014-02-01 18:45:11: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 99.120.21.158[4500]
2014-02-01 18:45:11: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT detected: ME PEER
2014-02-01 18:45:11: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: ISAKMP-SA established for 192.168.0.10[4500]-99.120.21.158[4500] with spi:78a21d9a6ff7a028:d143c9317afa091b
2014-02-01 18:45:11: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Sending Informational Exchange: notify payload[INITIAL-CONTACT]
2014-02-01 18:45:11: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Responding to new phase 2 negotiation: 192.168.0.10[0]<=>99.120.21.158[0]
2014-02-01 18:45:11: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Using IPsec SA configuration: 10.0.0.0/8<->192.168.1.68/32
2014-02-01 18:45:11: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Adjusting peer's encmode 61443(61443)->Tunnel(1)
2014-02-01 18:45:12: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 99.120.21.158->192.168.0.10 with spi=129883376(0x7bddcf0)
2014-02-01 18:45:12: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 192.168.0.10->99.120.21.158 with spi=654476335(0x2702842f)
2014-02-01 18:46:32: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Purged ISAKMP-SA with proto_id=ISAKMP and spi=78a21d9a6ff7a028:d143c9317afa091b.
2014-02-01 18:46:33: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: ISAKMP-SA deleted for 192.168.0.10[4500]-99.120.21.158[4500] with spi:78a21d9a6ff7a028:d143c9317afa091b
2014-02-01 19:04:30: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Adding IPSec configuration with identifier "happy00"
2014-02-01 19:04:30: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Adding IKE configuration with identifier "happy00"
2014-02-01 19:04:31: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Using IPsec SA configuration: 10.0.0.0/8<->166.142.243.242/32
2014-02-01 19:04:31: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Configuration found for 166.142.243.242.
2014-02-01 19:04:31: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Ignoring request for negotiation to 166.142.243.242 as Local is configured as Responder.
2014-02-01 19:05:13: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPSec configuration with identifier "happy00" deleted sucessfully
2014-02-01 19:05:13: [rv220w][IKE] WARNING: no phase1 found for "happy00"
2014-02-01 19:05:13: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IKE configuration with identifier "happy00" deleted sucessfully
2014-02-01 19:05:14: [rv220w][IKE] ERROR: sainfo identifier not found ("happy00")
2014-02-01 19:05:14: [rv220w][IKE] ERROR: Failed to Delete the IPSec configuration with identifier "happy00"
2014-02-01 19:05:14: [rv220w][IKE] ERROR: remote identifier not found ("")
2014-02-01 19:05:14: [rv220w][IKE] ERROR: Failed to Delete the IKE configuration with identifier ""
2014-02-01 19:05:53: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Adding IPSec configuration with identifier "happy00"
2014-02-01 19:05:53: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Adding IKE configuration with identifier "happy00"
2014-02-01 19:06:07: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Using IPsec SA configuration: 10.0.0.0/8<->166.142.243.242/32
2014-02-01 19:06:07: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Configuration found for 166.142.243.242.
2014-02-01 19:06:07: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Ignoring request for negotiation to 166.142.243.242 as Local is configured as Responder.
2014-02-01 19:06:27: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPSec configuration with identifier "happy00" deleted sucessfully
2014-02-01 19:06:27: [rv220w][IKE] WARNING: no phase1 found for "happy00"
2014-02-01 19:06:27: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IKE configuration with identifier "happy00" deleted sucessfully
2014-02-01 19:06:27: [rv220w][IKE] ERROR: sainfo identifier not found ("happy00")
2014-02-01 19:06:27: [rv220w][IKE] ERROR: Failed to Delete the IPSec configuration with identifier "happy00"
2014-02-01 19:06:27: [rv220w][IKE] ERROR: remote identifier not found ("")
2014-02-01 19:06:27: [rv220w][IKE] ERROR: Failed to Delete the IKE configuration with identifier ""
2014-02-01 19:09:21: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Adding IPSec configuration with identifier "happy00"
2014-02-01 19:09:21: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Adding IKE configuration with identifier "happy00"
2014-02-01 19:09:33: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Configuration found for 99.101.94.86[500].
2014-02-01 19:09:33: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received request for new phase 1 negotiation: 192.168.0.10[500]<=>99.101.94.86[500]
2014-02-01 19:09:33: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Beginning Identity Protection mode.
2014-02-01 19:09:33: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 19:09:33: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received Vendor ID: MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY
2014-02-01 19:09:33: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received Vendor ID: RFC 3947
2014-02-01 19:09:33: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2014-02-01 19:09:33: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 19:09:33: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 19:09:33: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 19:09:33: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 19:09:33: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: For 99.101.94.86[500], Selected NAT-T version: RFC 3947
2014-02-01 19:09:33: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 192.168.0.10[500]
2014-02-01 19:09:33: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 99.101.94.86[500]
2014-02-01 19:09:33: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT detected: ME PEER
2014-02-01 19:09:34: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Configuration found for 99.101.94.86[500].
2014-02-01 19:09:34: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received request for new phase 1 negotiation: 192.168.0.10[500]<=>99.101.94.86[500]
2014-02-01 19:09:34: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Beginning Identity Protection mode.
2014-02-01 19:09:34: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 19:09:34: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received Vendor ID: MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY
2014-02-01 19:09:34: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received Vendor ID: RFC 3947
2014-02-01 19:09:34: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2014-02-01 19:09:34: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 19:09:34: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 19:09:34: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 19:09:34: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: For 99.101.94.86[500], Selected NAT-T version: RFC 3947
2014-02-01 19:09:34: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 192.168.0.10[500]
2014-02-01 19:09:34: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 99.101.94.86[500]
2014-02-01 19:09:34: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT detected: ME PEER
2014-02-01 19:09:34: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Floating ports for NAT-T with peer 99.101.94.86[4500]
2014-02-01 19:09:34: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: ISAKMP-SA established for 192.168.0.10[4500]-99.101.94.86[4500] with spi:c45d81319a7961c2:df7f2a51e8084be5
2014-02-01 19:09:34: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Sending Informational Exchange: notify payload[INITIAL-CONTACT]
2014-02-01 19:09:34: [rv220w][IKE] NOTIFY: The packet is retransmitted by 99.101.94.86[500].
2014-02-01 19:09:35: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Responding to new phase 2 negotiation: 192.168.0.10[0]<=>99.101.94.86[0]
2014-02-01 19:09:35: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Using IPsec SA configuration: 10.0.0.0/8<->192.168.0.192/32
2014-02-01 19:09:35: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Adjusting peer's encmode 3(3)->Tunnel(1)
2014-02-01 19:09:35: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Floating ports for NAT-T with peer 99.101.94.86[4500]
2014-02-01 19:09:35: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: ISAKMP-SA established for 192.168.0.10[4500]-99.101.94.86[4500] with spi:51bf7e3f5283a021:c319b19d85b0abd0
2014-02-01 19:09:35: [rv220w][IKE] ERROR: wrong state 8.
2014-02-01 19:09:35: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 99.101.94.86->192.168.0.10 with spi=43713598(0x29b043e)
2014-02-01 19:09:35: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 192.168.0.10->99.101.94.86 with spi=2920045730(0xae0c5ca2)
2014-02-01 19:10:33: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Configuration found for 99.101.94.86[500].
2014-02-01 19:10:33: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received request for new phase 1 negotiation: 192.168.0.10[500]<=>99.101.94.86[500]
2014-02-01 19:10:33: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Beginning Identity Protection mode.
2014-02-01 19:10:33: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 19:10:33: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received Vendor ID: MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY
2014-02-01 19:10:33: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received Vendor ID: RFC 3947
2014-02-01 19:10:33: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2014-02-01 19:10:33: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 19:10:33: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 19:10:33: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 19:10:33: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: For 99.101.94.86[500], Selected NAT-T version: RFC 3947
2014-02-01 19:10:33: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Purged ISAKMP-SA with proto_id=ISAKMP and spi=51bf7e3f5283a021:c319b19d85b0abd0.
2014-02-01 19:10:33: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 192.168.0.10[500]
2014-02-01 19:10:33: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 99.101.94.86[500]
2014-02-01 19:10:33: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT detected: ME PEER
2014-02-01 19:10:33: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Floating ports for NAT-T with peer 99.101.94.86[4500]
2014-02-01 19:10:33: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: ISAKMP-SA established for 192.168.0.10[4500]-99.101.94.86[4500] with spi:518570911a48e055:e1b21587fbe64a7d
2014-02-01 19:10:34: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: ISAKMP-SA deleted for 192.168.0.10[4500]-99.101.94.86[4500] with spi:51bf7e3f5283a021:c319b19d85b0abd0
2014-02-01 19:11:31: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Purged ISAKMP-SA with proto_id=ISAKMP and spi=518570911a48e055:e1b21587fbe64a7d.
2014-02-01 19:11:32: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: ISAKMP-SA deleted for 192.168.0.10[4500]-99.101.94.86[4500] with spi:518570911a48e055:e1b21587fbe64a7d
2014-02-01 19:29:23: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA expired: ESP/Tunnel 192.168.0.10->166.155.0.67 with spi=712542982(0x2a788b06)
2014-02-01 19:29:23: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA expired: ESP/Tunnel 166.155.0.67->192.168.0.10 with spi=116125724(0x6ebf01c)
2014-02-01 19:33:13: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA expired: ESP/Tunnel 192.168.0.10->99.120.21.158 with spi=654476335(0x2702842f)
2014-02-01 19:33:13: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA expired: ESP/Tunnel 99.120.21.158->192.168.0.10 with spi=129883376(0x7bddcf0)
2014-02-01 19:40:16: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Configuration found for 166.155.0.67[4500].
2014-02-01 19:40:16: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Ports floated, peer initiatedcommunication on 4500
2014-02-01 19:40:16: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received request for new phase 1 negotiation: 192.168.0.10[4500]<=>166.155.0.67[4500]
2014-02-01 19:40:16: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Beginning Identity Protection mode.
2014-02-01 19:40:16: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received Vendor ID: MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY
2014-02-01 19:40:16: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 19:40:16: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2014-02-01 19:40:16: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 19:40:16: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: For 166.155.0.67[4500], Selected NAT-T version: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2014-02-01 19:40:16: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 192.168.0.10[4500]
2014-02-01 19:40:16: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT-D payload matches for 166.155.0.67[4500]
2014-02-01 19:40:16: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT detected: ME
2014-02-01 19:40:16: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: ISAKMP-SA established for 192.168.0.10[4500]-166.155.0.67[4500] with spi:86a51befd7ee8b38:1c072d85c8c7ab2e
2014-02-01 19:40:16: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Sending Informational Exchange: notify payload[INITIAL-CONTACT]
2014-02-01 19:40:16: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Responding to new phase 2 negotiation: 192.168.0.10[0]<=>166.155.0.67[0]
2014-02-01 19:40:16: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Using IPsec SA configuration: 10.0.0.0/8<->166.155.0.67/32
2014-02-01 19:40:16: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Adjusting peer's encmode 61443(61443)->Tunnel(1)
2014-02-01 19:40:17: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 166.155.0.67->192.168.0.10 with spi=131309239(0x7d39eb7)
2014-02-01 19:40:17: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 192.168.0.10->166.155.0.67 with spi=656105156(0x271b5ec4)
2014-02-01 19:41:35: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Purged ISAKMP-SA with proto_id=ISAKMP and spi=86a51befd7ee8b38:1c072d85c8c7ab2e.
2014-02-01 19:41:36: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: ISAKMP-SA deleted for 192.168.0.10[4500]-166.155.0.67[4500] with spi:86a51befd7ee8b38:1c072d85c8c7ab2e
2014-02-01 19:43:57: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Configuration found for 99.120.21.158[4500].
2014-02-01 19:43:57: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Ports floated, peer initiatedcommunication on 4500
2014-02-01 19:43:57: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received request for new phase 1 negotiation: 192.168.0.10[4500]<=>99.120.21.158[4500]
2014-02-01 19:43:57: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Beginning Identity Protection mode.
2014-02-01 19:43:57: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received Vendor ID: MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY
2014-02-01 19:43:57: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 19:43:57: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2014-02-01 19:43:57: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 19:43:57: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: For 99.120.21.158[4500], Selected NAT-T version: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2014-02-01 19:43:57: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 192.168.0.10[4500]
2014-02-01 19:43:57: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 99.120.21.158[4500]
2014-02-01 19:43:57: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT detected: ME PEER
2014-02-01 19:43:57: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: ISAKMP-SA established for 192.168.0.10[4500]-99.120.21.158[4500] with spi:e1442468d0529bbe:f66c9601351bd3a2
2014-02-01 19:43:57: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Sending Informational Exchange: notify payload[INITIAL-CONTACT]
2014-02-01 19:43:57: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Responding to new phase 2 negotiation: 192.168.0.10[0]<=>99.120.21.158[0]
2014-02-01 19:43:57: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Using IPsec SA configuration: 10.0.0.0/8<->192.168.1.68/32
2014-02-01 19:43:57: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Adjusting peer's encmode 61443(61443)->Tunnel(1)
2014-02-01 19:43:58: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 99.120.21.158->192.168.0.10 with spi=191762664(0xb6e10e8)
2014-02-01 19:43:58: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 192.168.0.10->99.120.21.158 with spi=3118196926(0xb9dbe8be)
2014-02-01 19:45:02: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Purged ISAKMP-SA with proto_id=ISAKMP and spi=e1442468d0529bbe:f66c9601351bd3a2.
2014-02-01 19:45:03: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: ISAKMP-SA deleted for 192.168.0.10[4500]-99.120.21.158[4500] with spi:e1442468d0529bbe:f66c9601351bd3a2
2014-02-01 19:57:36: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA expired: ESP/Tunnel 192.168.0.10->99.101.94.86 with spi=2920045730(0xae0c5ca2)
2014-02-01 19:57:36: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA expired: ESP/Tunnel 99.101.94.86->192.168.0.10 with spi=43713598(0x29b043e)
2014-02-01 19:59:08: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Configuration found for 99.101.94.86[500].
2014-02-01 19:59:08: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received request for new phase 1 negotiation: 192.168.0.10[500]<=>99.101.94.86[500]
2014-02-01 19:59:08: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Beginning Identity Protection mode.
2014-02-01 19:59:08: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 19:59:08: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received Vendor ID: MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY
2014-02-01 19:59:08: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received Vendor ID: RFC 3947
2014-02-01 19:59:08: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2014-02-01 19:59:08: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 19:59:08: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 19:59:08: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 19:59:08: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 19:59:08: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: For 99.101.94.86[500], Selected NAT-T version: RFC 3947
2014-02-01 19:59:08: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 192.168.0.10[500]
2014-02-01 19:59:08: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 99.101.94.86[500]
2014-02-01 19:59:08: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT detected: ME PEER
2014-02-01 19:59:08: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Floating ports for NAT-T with peer 99.101.94.86[4500]
2014-02-01 19:59:08: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: ISAKMP-SA established for 192.168.0.10[4500]-99.101.94.86[4500] with spi:5fbfcd9413b4c0f5:76e81b7495bfa7c8
2014-02-01 19:59:08: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Sending Informational Exchange: notify payload[INITIAL-CONTACT]
2014-02-01 19:59:08: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Responding to new phase 2 negotiation: 192.168.0.10[0]<=>99.101.94.86[0]
2014-02-01 19:59:08: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Using IPsec SA configuration: 10.0.0.0/8<->192.168.0.192/32
2014-02-01 19:59:08: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Adjusting peer's encmode 3(3)->Tunnel(1)
2014-02-01 19:59:09: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 99.101.94.86->192.168.0.10 with spi=267963700(0xff8cd34)
2014-02-01 19:59:09: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 192.168.0.10->99.101.94.86 with spi=2847327220(0xa9b6c3f4)
2014-02-01 20:04:12: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: an undead schedule has been deleted: 'pk_recvupdate'.
2014-02-01 20:04:12: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Purged IPsec-SA with proto_id=ESP and spi=2847327220(0xa9b6c3f4).
2014-02-01 20:04:12: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Purged ISAKMP-SA with proto_id=ISAKMP and spi=5fbfcd9413b4c0f5:76e81b7495bfa7c8.
2014-02-01 20:04:13: [rv220w][IKE] WARNING: no phase2 found for "happy00"
2014-02-01 20:04:13: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPSec configuration with identifier "happy00" deleted sucessfully
2014-02-01 20:04:13: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: ISAKMP-SA deleted for 192.168.0.10[4500]-99.101.94.86[4500] with spi:5fbfcd9413b4c0f5:76e81b7495bfa7c8
2014-02-01 20:04:13: [rv220w][IKE] WARNING: no phase2 bounded.
2014-02-01 20:04:13: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Sending Informational Exchange: delete payload[]
2014-02-01 20:04:13: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Purged IPsec-SA with spi=2920045730(0xae0c5ca2).
2014-02-01 20:04:13: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Purged IPsec-SA with spi=267963700(0xff8cd34).
2014-02-01 20:04:13: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Purged IPsec-SA with spi=43713598(0x29b043e).
2014-02-01 20:04:13: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Purged ISAKMP-SA with spi=c45d81319a7961c2:df7f2a51e8084be5.
2014-02-01 20:04:13: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: an undead schedule has been deleted: 'purge_remote'.
2014-02-01 20:04:13: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IKE configuration with identifier "happy00" deleted sucessfully
2014-02-01 20:04:13: [rv220w][IKE] ERROR: sainfo identifier not found ("happy00")
2014-02-01 20:04:13: [rv220w][IKE] ERROR: Failed to Delete the IPSec configuration with identifier "happy00"
2014-02-01 20:04:13: [rv220w][IKE] ERROR: remote identifier not found ("")
2014-02-01 20:04:13: [rv220w][IKE] ERROR: Failed to Delete the IKE configuration with identifier ""
2014-02-01 20:06:01: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Adding IPSec configuration with identifier "happy00"
2014-02-01 20:06:01: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Adding IKE configuration with identifier "happy00"
2014-02-01 20:06:07: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Using IPsec SA configuration: 10.0.0.0/8<->166.142.243.242/32
2014-02-01 20:06:07: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Configuration found for 166.142.243.242.
2014-02-01 20:06:07: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Ignoring request for negotiation to 166.142.243.242 as Local is configured as Responder.
2014-02-01 20:07:25: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IPSec configuration with identifier "happy00" deleted sucessfully
2014-02-01 20:07:25: [rv220w][IKE] WARNING: no phase1 found for "happy00"
2014-02-01 20:07:25: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: IKE configuration with identifier "happy00" deleted sucessfully
2014-02-01 20:07:25: [rv220w][IKE] ERROR: sainfo identifier not found ("happy00")
2014-02-01 20:07:25: [rv220w][IKE] ERROR: Failed to Delete the IPSec configuration with identifier "happy00"
2014-02-01 20:07:25: [rv220w][IKE] ERROR: remote identifier not found ("")
2014-02-01 20:07:25: [rv220w][IKE] ERROR: Failed to Delete the IKE configuration with identifier ""
2014-02-01 20:09:58: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Adding IPSec configuration with identifier "happy00"
2014-02-01 20:09:58: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Adding IKE configuration with identifier "happy00"
2014-02-01 20:10:11: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Configuration found for 99.101.94.86[500].
2014-02-01 20:10:11: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received request for new phase 1 negotiation: 192.168.0.10[500]<=>99.101.94.86[500]
2014-02-01 20:10:11: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Beginning Identity Protection mode.
2014-02-01 20:10:11: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 20:10:11: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received Vendor ID: MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY
2014-02-01 20:10:11: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received Vendor ID: RFC 3947
2014-02-01 20:10:11: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
2014-02-01 20:10:11: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 20:10:11: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 20:10:11: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 20:10:11: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Received unknown Vendor ID
2014-02-01 20:10:11: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: For 99.101.94.86[500], Selected NAT-T version: RFC 3947
2014-02-01 20:10:11: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 192.168.0.10[500]
2014-02-01 20:10:11: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT-D payload does not match for 99.101.94.86[500]
2014-02-01 20:10:11: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: NAT detected: ME PEER
2014-02-01 20:10:12: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Floating ports for NAT-T with peer 99.101.94.86[4500]
2014-02-01 20:10:12: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: ISAKMP-SA established for 192.168.0.10[4500]-99.101.94.86[4500] with spi:1e81ce312812da50:569671b6b2a1ad6a
2014-02-01 20:10:12: [rv220w][IKE] INFO: Sending Informational Exchange: notify payload[INITIAL-CONTACT]
Maybe you are looking for
-
Hi everyone, Is there a code snippet to tell if the application is running in the simulator or on the actual device? thanks tony
-
Problems installing Adobe Flash Player
G'day, I am having issues downloading Adobe Flash Player on my Mac. I downloaded OS X Yosemite and every time I try to get the latest version of Flash Player, the downloading stops at 32% or 34%. Is there anything I could do to solve the issue? Thank
-
Adding date/time stamp to images
Hi all, we are working with multiples video sources with JMF. Now we need to add on each stream a date/time stamp and a name of the source camera. Does someone knows how we can do it without manipulate each frame on each source ? Thanks in advance an
-
What to do if Final Cut Express was installed after Aperture, on a new MaBook Pro Retina running OS X 10.7.4?
-
How do I get artwork to mysongs/albums ?
How do I get the album artwork to my songs/music when there is no album art. I tryed downloading the otunes art program thing that is to supose to help you get the albm artwork but all I get is abunch of loopholes and downnloading this and that , exc