Consuming Orchestration Exposed WCF service On remote system.

Hello All , I am new to BizTalk, so bear with me
I have created an orchestration for Insert operation to DB and Exposed it as WCF service, finally deployed in IIS fine.
but whenever I am trying browse wsdl of service its prompting as : Network Error (dns_unresolved_hostname)
Your requested host "DomainName" could not be resolved by DNS.
url : http://domainName/Biztalk_PaymentTransaction_Process_PaymentTransaction_Port_RcvTransaction.svc?singleWsdl .
I just replaced that domainName and put IP there I am able to browse my service, worked fine on Local system.
but while trying with same url replacing domainname with
IP on remote system, its throwing Exception as below
There was no endpoint listening at http://DomainName/Biztalk_PaymentTransaction_Process_PaymentTransaction_Port_RcvTransaction.svc
that could accept the message. This is often caused by an incorrect address or SOAP action. See InnerException, if present, for more details.
please Explain what I need to do to resolve this,
Do I'm missing something or what extra I need to DO...
Thanks to all.

Associate the domain name and the IP of the server where the service is hosted in the host file.
Goto the server where the service is hosted.
Goto the server’s host file in %SystemRoot%\system32\drivers\etc\hosts
Take a backup of the host file before you edit it.
Add the following entry as the last line in the host file, replacing in it with the actual IP Domain name.
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx YourdomainName.com
where xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx = IP and YourdomainName.com = domain name
If this answers your question please mark it accordingly. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful by clicking the upward arrow mark next to my reply.

Similar Messages

Is there any there any scenario where we have to publish "Orchestration as WCF Service" and not "Schema as WCF service"

Hi All,
Recently in one interview a senior architect asked me this question-
Q- In which scenario we have to publish "Orchestration as WCF Service" and not "Schema as WCF service".
He also told there are some scenarios which can't be accomplished by exposing schema as WCF Service.
As per my understanding below are the benefits of exposing Orchestration as a web service, but there is no such scenario where we can't be achieved by exposing Schema as WCF Service.
Publishing orchestrations is a way to go when:
Implementing simple solutions with small number of dependencies when we have control over both consumer and service endpoints
* Rapid prototyping, proof-of-concepts, service stubs
* Developing local scoped services, when collaboration is not an issue
* Don’t care much about interoperability
* No skilled XML Schema, WSDL developers available
(http://geekswithblogs.net/paulp/archive/2006/03/21/72943.aspx)
Please share your inputs.
Thanks,
Prashant
Please mark this post accordingly if it answers your query or is helpful.

First, the answer to the question as written is NO, because there really isn't a difference between the two options.
To be more specific, the only difference is in the Wizard itself in that when you publish an Orchestration, the Wizard reads the request/response schema(s) and Service & Operation name from the Orchestration Port rather than asking for them as it does
when you choose Publish schemas.
Basically, if you choose Publish schemas and enter the same values configured in the Orchestration Port, the output will be the same. So, publishing an Orchestration is merely a convenient shortcut.
Most importantly though, all of this only affects the metadata publishing. There is no difference in the Receive Location (BizTalk or IIS), if you chose to create one. The receive stack is schema agnostic, always.
In practice, the only thing the Wizard does that is difficult to do manually is organize the metadata, but I haven't had to create a metadata endpoint in years. The only reason I even run the Wizards is to create the IIS app.

Expose an orchestration as WCF service with a Request-Response port set to Direct Binding

Hello ,
I'm trying to expose an orchestration as a WCF service (while the Request-Response port is set to Direct binding) . Is this possible ? (the issue will be correlating back the response to the synchronous WCF request after the response is posted back
to the Message Box by the Direct Send logical port).
I have no problem in exposing the orchestration while I'm setting the Binding port to 'Specify Later' (What I'm trying to do actually is to expose a orchestration using different adapters (like Http and Wcf ) in the same time ).
Thanks

Yes, you can publish an orchestration as WCF/Web service which has direct bound request-response port.
Subscription works based on “EpmRRCorrelationToken”
and “RouteDirectToTP”. When you enlist the orchestration which
has the direct bound request-response port (also published as service), its subscription are based on above two context properties and they take care of correction.
And also the response matches to the request part of the port due to the nature of two-way communication protocol.
Create an Orchestration with direct-bound request-response port and publish it as service. This will work. Give it a try
Regards,
M.R.Ashwin Prabhu
If this answers your question please mark it accordingly. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful by clicking the upward arrow mark next to my reply.

BizTalk Tracking Profile Editor not tracking the data and how to implement the Orchestration as wcf service over SSL

Hi Ashwinprabhu,
thank you very much for your answer.
i have one more query, I have orchestration published as wcf service in IIS and internally orchestration calling one more service , it means orchestration sending a request and getting response back from the service.
actually we are implementing the copy of that called service through biztalk orchestration for system automatic and tracking failed messages and n/w failures.
But tracking profiler not tracking the Data.
And we need to develop the http service as https(Over SSL), we implemented in iis using self
signed certificate, it is working just browser for wsdl(in browser), we are not able to test the service in wcf test client, it is giving wsdl error, in wsdl schema reference showing with HTTP only,
please help me how to resolve the issue.
Teegala

First things first, I think it's best to publish only schemas as WCF service for dependency management reasons. That said - WSDL availability is covered in the WCF adapter under the behaviors. If you're using HTTPBasic this may be hard to modify, but using
WCFCustom allows you to add the WSDL behavior and specify that it should be available via HTTPS.
As to the BAM, are you using TPE within the orchestration or at the port level? I'd imagine your TPE tracks the start and end events of your orchestration using the Orchestration Schedule. If you're fairly confident that the TPE is correct and
yet don't see BAM data 1) make sure your SQL Agent is running healthy and all jobs look OK and 2) check the TDDS tables in both the message box and the BAMPrimaryImport databases. These will show you if there has been some sort of sync issue. There's
even a TDDS errors tables - so check that out.
Kind Regards,
-Dan
If this answers your question, please Mark as Answer

Deploy An Orchestration Exposed Service in Remote IIS Server

Hello Experts, I have developed a Biztalk Application and Exposed the Orchestration as WCF Service. It is working fine in my Local System. But Now i would like to Deploy this service in a remote IIS server (Intranet), where i dont have Biztalk Installed.
Please Suggest What is the Procedure to do this.
Thank you
saroj

Hi Saroj,
You need to have BizTalk installed on the machine on which you are deploying the WCF service. As the WCF service needs some assemblies and thats the reason you have got error above.
There is a work around , you can have look at it :
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-au/library/ee308809%28v=BTS.10%29.aspx
I hope this helps!!!!!! Please mark as Helpful.
If this answers your question, please mark it as "Answered". It will help to reduce visits to same post as its already answered and will help guys with same question as yours without even posting it .
Maheshkumar S. Tiwari|Team lead/Consultant(EDI/EAI)|iVision Software Pvt Ltd, Pune.

How to send EDI from WCF adapter to WCF service

Hi,
1. I have created an orchestration which is published as WCF service.
2. I have created an orchestration which receives an XML from WCF client and process it.
3. I have created a WCF dynamic send port.
Problem: From this dynamic send port, I want to send EDI file to a WCF service that will receive this EDI file. How can I achieve this. Below are my concerns:
-> For creating this WCF service, I need to know the contract of Biztalk WCF adapter which sends EDI file.
Thanks ...

Hi,
How can we create WCF service to receive the EDI sent by the BTS. What contract should be used for receiving this EDI file in WCF service.
What changes have to be made in the orchestrations to send the EDI file to the WCF send Dynamic port. Below is the code i am using.
EDIOutboundPort(Microsoft.XLANGs.BaseTypes.Address)="URL Address";
EDIOutboundPort(Microsoft.XLANGs.BaseTypes.TransportType)="WCF-basicHttp";
Please correct me if i am wrong
Thanks
"How can we create WCF service to receive the EDI sent by the BTS. What contract should be used for receiving this EDI file in WCF service" - This is two different questions.
"How can we create WCF service to receive the EDI sent by the BTS" - Using BizTalk WCF Services Publishing Wizard, the wizard would ask for the "Create BizTalk receive locations in the following application " for creating
the receive location for the message published to the exposed WCF service. Through this receive port/location, the service would receive the message.
In this case, I am not sure why do you want to expose the Orchestration as WCF Service when you want to send message to this Orchestration/WCF service (which after converting from Orch) through another orchestration. You could either use call/start orchestration
to send message from one to another.
"What contract should be used for receiving this EDI file in WCF service" - may be this question is not correct. You have created a Orchestration which you exposed as WCF service. So while creating the Orch you know the type of message this Orchestration
is bound to, so use the same contract. Or as mentioned in my earlier reply, use "Consume WCF wizard" to consume the WCF service which would create the web message for you.
If this answers your question please mark it accordingly. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful by clicking the upward arrow mark next to my reply.

Biztalk: Publish as WCF Service

Hello Experts,
In Biztalk, i want to publish a WCF Service
As i understand it can be done in two way
1. Schemas as a Webservice
2. Orchestration as a webservice
i want a string as input for that webservice, it is just a string
can you please advise how we can publish a webservice which will take string as input.
Thanks for help

A quick way I can think of is,
create an Orchestration, create a message of type "System.String" from .NET classes.
Create a receive port and in Select a Port Type, change
Access Restrictions from Internal (default) to
Public-no limits. This will enable you to expose the Orchestration as WCF service
Create the rest of the orchestration with your business process that you want to do with the received message.
Now publish the Orchestration as WCF service, now this will access only string as the input.
If this answers your question please mark it accordingly. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful by clicking the upward arrow mark next to my reply.

Problem in run Wcf service that published with Wizard

hi
i published my orchestration as wcf service with biztalk wcf service publishing wizard .it located in my IIS . but any time i try to access to tis wcfservice with my browser i just recive this error .
where is the problem?
Error:
Server Error in '/BizTalk_Server_Project5' Application.
Login failed for user 'IIS APPPOOL\DefaultAppPool'.
Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code.
Exception Details: System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Login failed for user 'IIS APPPOOL\DefaultAppPool'.
Source Error:
An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of the current web request. Information regarding the origin and location of the exception can be identified using the exception stack trace below.
Stack Trace:
[SqlException (0x80131904): Login failed for user 'IIS APPPOOL\DefaultAppPool'.]
[TargetInvocationException: Exception has been thrown by the target of an invocation.]
Microsoft.BizTalk.TransportProxy.Interop.IBTTransportProxy.RegisterIsolatedReceiver(String url, IBTTransportConfig callback) +0
Microsoft.BizTalk.Adapter.Wcf.Runtime.WcfIsolatedReceiver`2.RegisterIsolatedReceiver(Uri uri) +675
Microsoft.BizTalk.Adapter.Wcf.Runtime.WebServiceHostFactory`3.CreateServiceHost(String constructorString, Uri[] baseAddresses) +231
System.ServiceModel.HostingManager.CreateService(String normalizedVirtualPath) +1440
System.ServiceModel.HostingManager.ActivateService(String normalizedVirtualPath) +44
System.ServiceModel.HostingManager.EnsureServiceAvailable(String normalizedVirtualPath) +615
[ServiceActivationException: The service '/BizTalk_Server_Project5/WcfService_BizTalk_x0020_Server_x0020_Project5.svc' cannot be activated due to an exception during compilation. The exception message is: Exception has been thrown by the target of an invocation..]
System.Runtime.AsyncResult.End(IAsyncResult result) +679246
System.ServiceModel.Activation.HostedHttpRequestAsyncResult.End(IAsyncResult result) +190
System.ServiceModel.Activation.ServiceHttpModule.EndProcessRequest(IAsyncResult ar) +300622
System.Web.AsyncEventExecutionStep.OnAsyncEventCompletion(IAsyncResult ar) +8837348
Version Information: Microsoft .NET Framework Version:4.0.30319; ASP.NET Version:4.0.30319.1

You get this error because your published orchestration (WCF service) is running in an application pool (IIS) which security user is not a member of the BizTalk Isolated Host Users group.
To solve this issue create an application pool with a security user that is part of the BizTalk Isolated Host Users Group or check the current application pool and add the user to the BizTalk Isolated Host Users.
Glenn Colpaert - MCTS BizTalk Server - Blog : http://blog.codit.eu

WCF-WebService count, accessed by the end user, the wcf-webservice published BizTalk orchestration as wcf-webservice.

Hi BizTalk Experts,
Please help me out, following is my scenario.
I had published orchestration as wcf-service, for integration purpose. Now I need to count, how many times the service accessed and failed and successful bye users.
Thanks
Teegala.
Teegala

If you need to know how many times the orchestration was called, you can use BAM just like when the orchestration wasn't exposed as web service.
The success/failure rate depends on what you mean by that: functional (which is part of the workflow in the orchestration) or technical (which is infra related).
Jean-Paul Smit | Didago IT Consultancy
Blog |
Twitter | LinkedIn
MCTS BizTalk 2006/2010 + Certified SOA Architect
Please indicate "Mark as Answer" if this post has answered the question.

BizTalk Server 2013 R2 Orchestration as web service with untyped messages.

Hi,
I have created an orchestration in BizTalk server 2013 R2 which receives and send untyped messages to an public Request-Response port. And am trying to publish this orchestration as web service, am getting "Object reference not set to an instance"
error in the Publish Web service wizard. I didn't find any error details in event viewer.
Please let me know what is the issue with this and how resolve this.
Thanks,
Praveen
Praveen

"Object reference not set to an instance" issue +Orchestration as WCF service + BizTalk
2013 R2 ..has no relation.
Just created an Orchestration, which would accept XMLDocument as input (Request) message and output (Response) message in both BizTalk 2013 and also in 2013 R2.
I can expose the Orchestration as WCF service without any issues as mentioned here and can able to send and get any XMLDocument to this server (Which is an Orchestration)
If this answers your question please mark it accordingly. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful by clicking the upward arrow mark next to my reply.

Cross Domain error for Silverlight + MVC application with self hosted WCF service on azure

Hi,
We are migrating existing Silverlight application to MVC; existing Silverlight application is hosted on
Azure which is consuming self-hosted WCF service. For authentication we have implemented
ADFS with WIF (passive). The cloud service (<myWebSite>.cloudapp.net) is C Name to (<myWebSite>.<myDomain>.com) and we
are consuming WCF service at <myWebSite>.cloudapp.net/<myService>.svc, as we were getting “Cross Domain” error so we have added “clientaccesspolicy.xml” at the root of “WEB ROLE”.
Existing Silverlight application works fine but the problem occurred when we deploy our migrated application to the same cloud service. We are getting a “Cross Domain” error.
The same migrated application works fine on UAT environment, the only difference is UAT environment is
without ADFS WIF implementation.
Migrated application is half Silverlight and half MVC with initial landing page is Silverlight. MVC web role is used to host the service i.e. .SVC . To go to SL landing page , redirected from home controller. Following is being observed in fiddler for this
application
Existing Silverlight application -
After authentication with ADFS it redirect to Silverlight landing page.
Before calling service method it looks for “clientaccesspolicy.xml”
In response header we are getting the content of “clientaccesspolicy.xml”
And after this everything works fine
Migrated Silverlight-MVC application –
After authentication with ADFS it redirects to “HomeController” and from there we are redirecting to Silverlight landing page.
Before calling service method it looks for “clientaccesspolicy.xml”
In response header we are getting following content - “https://federation-sts.<myDomain>.com/adfs/ls/?wa=wsignin1.0&
wtrealm=https%3a%2f%2f<myWebSite>.<myDomain>.com&
wctx=rm%3d0%26id%3dpassive%26ru%3d%252fclientaccesspolicy.xml&wct=2014-03-17T10%3a36%3a04Z”
4.Throw “Cross Domain” error.
Also we have added filter in
RouteConfig
for .xml file
routes.IgnoreRoute("{*allxml}",
new { allxml = @".*\.xml(/.*)?" });
NOTE: There is no configuration change apart from MVC configuration.
We have done RDP to web role and found that “clientaccesspiolicy.xml” is present at “E:\approot” location and it is also accessible at “https://<myWebSite>.<myDomain>.com/clientaccesspolicy.xml”.
Please help
Thanks,
Rahul P

Hi,
Please try to configure the cross domain policy file to allow public read access (that is, access it without federation requirement), make sure you can access the address
http://something/clientaccesspiolicy.xml directly in a browser
without redirecting to check whether the cross domain policy file could be anonymous accessed (Please start a new browser session and make sure you're
not logged in. Then test the cross domain policy file.).
Best Regards,
Ming Xu
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

Biztalk schema exposing as WCF service with multiple operations

Hi,
I am working on a design pattern to expose the BizTalk schema as a WCF service and thought of taking expert’s advice. I have a single schema with 30 different nodes and each one is a different message type. For this 30 message types we need to expose WCF
endpoints to customer for consuming from their application.
When I exposed this schema as WCF service, a single receive location got created in BizTalk application and in IIS there is one .svc file. I defined 30 operations for this while exposing the endpoint with wizard.
Currently I came up with the below 2 approaches but I did not like them as there is more redundancy
Create 30 different orchestrations and each orchestration subscribes to Message Box direct binding with message type as filter.
Create a single orchestration that binds to single receive location( this location got created by wizard..) and access the operation/message type in the expression shape. Based on this value create 30 IF conditions for each message type. For this the
single orchestration receive shape should have a message type of xml document and then access the type. Is it possible?
I don’t like the above approaches as it is very difficult to maintain and also difficult to add for any new message type.
Does anyone has good ideas for doing this?
Thanks
JB

"Canonical Schemas" are used where multiple source messages need to be addressed by a SINGLE Operation !!!
Every operation anyway translates to a separate process. Forget that we're dealing with BizTalk for a minute, when you're writing plain we services, you introduce new service contracts (operations) when you deal with different data contracts. To come back,
in BizTalk your data contracts are your schemas. So when you have multiple schemas, each requiring different processing then you need different orchestrations.
Let us for a minute assume you've defined a single service schema (very possible with a service header and a service details where the service data contract could differ). Now you use this schema to expose ONE service endpoint (good till now). In that service
you're suggesting to ADD decisions (something like a switch statement where you'll do 'x' set of activities is the message is of 'x' type and so on... How is this sustainable? Every time you introduce an new operation, you'll have to tear down and redeploy
the new orchestration which will affect all other operations. During the introduction of ONE op you may touch other parts of the orchestration (multiple branches in a parallel shape anyways make the orchestration very unwieldy from a code management/support
standpoint) and introduce errors in existing ops.
Regards.

Best way to update exposed schema as WCF service ?

Hi,
I am newbie to WCF + BizTalk. I am doing small POC's on exposing & consuming orchestration & schemas as WCF service. I had successfully exposed schema as WCF service also consumed this service using C# client code.
My question is that suppose if there is a change in the existing exposed schema say a field has to be added then what is the best way to update a service. Do we need to add a field in schema & again expose this schema and update our service referernce
in the client code ? Or this can be achieved in a better way ???
Regards,
Rahul Madaan
BizTalkVillage.blogspot.com

Hi Rahul,
When you expose Orchestration or Schema as a WCF service and let's say if there are only few fields which got updated/added then there are multiple options to handle it.
For example-
1) You can go ahead and update the XSD files within AppCode folder. You can find this folder by doing explore on web application(in iis manager). Whenever we expose schema or orchestration these schemas are generated and kept in this folder. When you check
the WSDL it will have reference to these schemas and they will define the contract of incoming and outgoing message(request and response). This is the easiest way. I prefer it for Dev environments and testing.
2) But I would suggest you to run the publishing wizard again as it's less error prone.
Please understand that BizTalk will always remain unaffected of the type of message it receives from the isolated host, the actual problem comes when hits the first receive shape(typed message).
Thanks,
Prashant
Please mark this post accordingly if it answers your query or is helpful.

No transport error while consuming WCF service in a REST way

Hi,
Here is a small article on when we usually face No Transport error and how to get rid of it.
I recently worked on a sample application using “app for Office” (New in Visual Studio 11.0)
What is “app for Office”?
An app for Office is basically a webpage that is hosted inside an Office client application. You can use apps to extend the functionality of a document, email message, meeting request, or appointment. Apps
can run in multiple environments and clients, including rich Office desktop clients, Office Web Apps, mobile browsers, and also on-premises and in the cloud.
What can an app for Office do?
An app for Office can do pretty much anything a webpage can do inside the browser, such as the following:
Provide an interactive UI and custom logic through      JavaScript. (Develop UI using HTML and JavaScript)
Use JavaScript frameworks such as jQuery.
Connect to REST endpoints and web services via      HTTP and AJAX.
Run server-side code or logic, if the page is      implemented using a server-side scripting language such as ASP or PHP.
As “app for Office” doesn’t have an option to write server side scripting (unlike code behind or in-line coding feature in ASP.NET/MVC) we will have to go for web service or WCF service and consume the service
using any JavaScript framework like Jquery.
I wrote a simple WCF service to hook up with server side code and consumed the service using Jquery as follows
$(document).ready(function () {
$.ajax({
type: "GET",
url: "http://localhost/MyService.svc/rh/data?id=" + $('#sampleType').val(),
processData: false,
contentType: "application/json; charset=utf-8",
dataType: "json",
crossDomain: true,
success: function (data) {
alert(data)
error: function (xhr, status, error) {
alert(error);
I encountered an error saying “No Transport” when I executed the client application.
I did some investigation on this and found out the root cause that cross-domain request was disabled. But I was really not sure whether it was at my WCF service end or “app for Office” client end. I added
Client Access policy and Cross-domain-policy xml files to WCF service in order to enable cross-domain request
so that service will accept any type requests sent form different domains.
Client Access policy
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<access-policy>
<cross-domain-access>
<policy>
<allow-from http-request-headers="*">
<domain uri="*"/>
</allow-from>
<grant-to>
<resource include-subpaths="true" path="/"/>
</grant-to>
</policy>
</cross-domain-access>
</access-policy>
Cross-domain-policy
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE cross-domain-policy SYSTEM "http://www.macromedia.com/xml/dtds/cross-domain-policy.dtd">
<cross-domain-policy>
<allow-http-request-headers-from domain="*" headers="*"/>
</cross-domain-policy>
Both the policies should be in different XML files
But this didn’t solve my problem. After a little bit more investigation I found exactly where and how to enable-cross domain requests.
Solution
We need to enable cross-domain requests in environments that do not support cross-domain requests.
“Cors is equal to true if a browser can create an XMLHttpRequest object and if thatXMLHttpRequest
object has a withCredentials property. To enable cross-domain requests in environments that do not support cors yet but do allow cross-domain XHRrequests (windows gadget, etc), set $.support.cors = true;”
You just have to add jQuery.support.cors = true; in your client scripting and it works perfectly fine.
[Cors- Cross-Origin Resource Sharing]
A simple example:
$.support.cors = true;
$(document).ready(function () {
$.ajax({
type: "GET",
url: "http://localhost/MyService.svc/rh/data?id=" + $('#sampleType').val(),
processData: false,
contentType: "application/json; charset=utf-8",
dataType: "json",
crossDomain: true,
success: function (data) {
alert(data)
error: function (xhr, status, error) {
alert(error);
Hope this will be helpful.
Thanks

This is very good technich to resolve the problem. but this is not working in Google chrome or Firfox . can any one help me.

WCF service connection forcibly closed by the remote host for large data

Hello ,
                    WCF service is used to generate excel report , When the stored procedure returns large data around 30,000 records. Service fails
to return the data . Below is the mentioned erorr log :
System.ServiceModel.CommunicationException: An error occurred while receiving the HTTP
response to <service url> This could be due to the service
endpoint binding not using the HTTP protocol. This could also be due to an HTTP request context being aborted by
the server (possibly due to the service shutting down). See server logs for more details. ---> System.Net.WebException:
The underlying connection was closed: An unexpected error occurred on a receive. ---> System.IO.IOException:
Unable to read data from the transport connection: An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host.
---> System.Net.Sockets.SocketException: An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host
   at System.Net.Sockets.Socket.Receive(Byte[] buffer, Int32 offset, Int32 size, SocketFlags socketFlags)
   at System.Net.Sockets.NetworkStream.Read(Byte[] buffer, Int32 offset, Int32 size)
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
   at System.Net.Sockets.NetworkStream.Read(Byte[] buffer, Int32 offset, Int32 size)
   at System.Net.PooledStream.Read(Byte[] buffer, Int32 offset, Int32 size)
   at System.Net.Connection.SyncRead(HttpWebRequest request, Boolean userRetrievedStream, Boolean probeRead)
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
   at System.Net.HttpWebRequest.GetResponse()
   at System.ServiceModel.Channels.HttpChannelFactory.HttpRequestChannel.HttpChannelRequest.WaitForReply(TimeSpan timeout).
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
Server stack trace:
   at System.ServiceModel.Channels.HttpChannelUtilities.ProcessGetResponseWebException(WebException webException, HttpWebRequest request, HttpAbortReason abortReason)
   at System.ServiceModel.Channels.HttpChannelFactory.HttpRequestChannel.HttpChannelRequest.WaitForReply(TimeSpan timeout)
   at System.ServiceModel.Channels.RequestChannel.Request(Message message, TimeSpan timeout)
   at System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.RequestChannelBinder.Request(Message message, TimeSpan timeout)
   at System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel.Call(String action, Boolean oneway, ProxyOperationRuntime operation, Object[] ins, Object[] outs, TimeSpan timeout)
   at System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannelProxy.InvokeService(IMethodCallMessage methodCall, ProxyOperationRuntime operation)
   at System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannelProxy.Invoke(IMessage message)
Exception rethrown at [0]:
   at System.Runtime.Remoting.Proxies.RealProxy.HandleReturnMessage(IMessage reqMsg, IMessage retMsg)
   at System.Runtime.Remoting.Proxies.RealProxy.PrivateInvoke(MessageData& msgData, Int32 type)
   at IDataSetService.GetMastersData(Int32 tableID, String userID, String action, Int32 maxRecordLimit, Auditor& audit, DataSet& resultSet, Object[] FieldValues)
   at SPARC.UI.Web.Entities.Reports.Framework.Presenters.MasterPresenter.GetDataSet(Int32 masterID, Object[] procParams, Auditor& audit, Int32 maxRecordLimit).
WEB CONFIG SETTINGS OF SERVICE
<httpRuntime maxRequestLength="2147483647" executionTimeout="360"/>
<binding name="BasicHttpBinding_Common" closeTimeout="10:00:00" openTimeout="10:00:00"
       receiveTimeout="10:00:00" sendTimeout="10:00:00" allowCookies="false"
       bypassProxyOnLocal="false" hostNameComparisonMode="StrongWildcard"
       maxBufferSize="2147483647" maxBufferPoolSize="0" maxReceivedMessageSize="2147483647"
       messageEncoding="Text" textEncoding="utf-8"   transferMode="Buffered"
       useDefaultWebProxy="true">
<readerQuotas     maxDepth="2147483647"
      maxStringContentLength="2147483647"  maxArrayLength="2147483647"
      maxBytesPerRead="2147483647"  maxNameTableCharCount="2147483647" />
     <security mode="None">
WEB CONFIG SETTINGS OF CLIENT
<httpRuntime maxRequestLength="2147483647" requestValidationMode="2.0"/>
<binding name="BasicHttpBinding_Common"
       closeTimeout="10:00:00"       openTimeout="10:00:00"
       receiveTimeout="10:00:00"       sendTimeout="10:00:00"
        allowCookies="false"        bypassProxyOnLocal="false"
        hostNameComparisonMode="StrongWildcard"        maxBufferSize="2147483647"
        maxBufferPoolSize="2147483647"        maxReceivedMessageSize="2147483647"
        messageEncoding="Text"        textEncoding="utf-8"
        transferMode="Buffered"        useDefaultWebProxy="true">
<readerQuotas
       maxDepth="2147483647"
       maxStringContentLength="2147483647"
       maxArrayLength="2147483647"
       maxBytesPerRead="2147483647"
       maxNameTableCharCount="2147483647" />

Doing binding configuration on a WCF service to override the default settings is not done the sameway it would be done on the client-side config file.
A custom bindng must be used on the WCF service-side config to override the defualt binding settings on the WCF service-side.
http://robbincremers.me/2012/01/01/wcf-custom-binding-by-configuration-and-by-binding-standardbindingelement-and-standardbindingcollectionelement/
Thee readerQuotas and everything else must be given in the Custom Bindings to override any default setttings on the WCF service side.
Also, you are posting to the wrong forum.
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/vstudio/en-us/home?forum=wcf

Consuming Orchestration Exposed WCF service On remote system.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for