Control Transfer of Bills of Product for Preference

Dear Experts,
We are currently setting up the preference processing service for NAFTA (GTS 10.1).
One of the steps to be executed in the customizing, is the Preference: Control Transfer of Bills of Material.
We are facing the issue the field Rule set type (Plug In Customizing on ERP 6.0) is not possible to maintain (Table /SAPSLL/V_TBTGR3 field: PFONY).
How can the field PFONY for BOM transfer for NAFTA be customized?
Please help me to findout the reason, why I am not able to maintain the field.
I look forward to read your thoughs on this.
Thank you for your help.

Hi Necla,
The screen element is set to "Invisible" in the screen logic. I have no idea why that should be so. It will be best to report the problem with an OSS incident, unless someone else can tell you why it makes sense.
Regards,
Dave

Similar Messages

Production - Multiple Bills of Material for a FG Product

Hi,
In SAP B1 - It is not possible to create multiple Bills of Materials for a FG product.
Is there any workaround to address this issue?
At our location we have multiple alternative combinations of components which can be used to create the same FG product.
One alternative is to create Special Production Orders (but with no BOM). Is there a better option?
Regards
Manish
Edited by: Manish Chaturvedi on Apr 1, 2009 12:51 PM

HI Manish,
Your Bill of material is dynamic so just try to solve this by alternative items(Raw Material). i hope it will work.
But in SAP B1 standard there is no work arround. you have to change the BIll of material every time. or make one udf in the title level with the name version 1,2,3 ..... and save it in the system. and pick the BOM which you will needed at the time of Production.
I hope it will solve your question.
Ashish Gupte

I think I have been billed 8 times for a product I...

Hi,
I just tried to purchase the Soundhound app from the Ovi store for my Nokia C7. I use my phone bill for purchases. I was asked to confirm the purchase which I did. I waited then a message came up saying there was a problem with the billing service and I should try again later, so I exited the screen
Almost immediately I was bombarded with 8 identical SMS messages from OviStore (82102) saying "Thankyou for your purchase from OviStore by Nokia. Your transaction ID is (all different numbers in each text)".
Also there was no link in any of them to my download! I have a suspicion I have been billed 8 times for a product I haven't even received.
Is there a contact phone number for Ovistore so I can rectify this?

I've tried to buy other application today and also had the same problem. I've performed attempts 2 times via Phone Bill and it took the payment twice from my phone.
I've just sent the message about it to support (Support -> Contact us) and asked them to refund the payments.

Transfer of Billing Document to COPA

Hi,
We are using Account based CO PA and when we are doing Post Good issue the COPA document is generating for COGS but when we are doing the billing the COPA document is not generating to transfer the Sales,Sales Deduction to the COPA.
What would be the resaons for this and help me in this.

Transfer of Billing Documents
In this step you define how billing document items for sales from stock are transferred to Profitability Analysis (CO-PA).
In costing-based CO-PA, you need to assign condition types and quantity fields from Sales and Distribution (SD) to the value and quantity fields CO-PA.
Activities:
Assign condition types to the desired value fields. These assignments let you transfer "real" conditions (those that are posted to FI) and "statistical" (fictitious) conditions to CO-PA. Assign value fields.
For real conditions, the corresponding revenue, sales deduction, and cost-of-sales accounts must be defined as CO-relevant accounts (cost or revenue elements).
Assign the quantity fields in SD to the desired quantity fields in CO-PA. Assign quantity fields.
If desired, reset individual value fields for billing documents of a certain billing type. Reset value fields.
For account-based CO-PA, the system only transfers those posting lines that are posted to FI as well.
Activities:
Only "real" postings that are posted to FI can be transferred to account-based CO-PA. All you need to do to transfer this data to CO-PA is make sure that the desired revenue, sales deduction, and cost-of-sales accounts are defined as relevant for CO.
Prerequisites
The operating concern to which you want to transfer billing documents has been completely defined.
You have maintained record type "F" for the necessary number ranges.
You have activated the desired form(s) of Profitability Analysis.
Carry out proper setting in the following transaction for transfering SD-Billing Document to CO PA:
In SPRO Transaction follow the below mentioned path and carry out the settings
Controlling->Profitability Analysis->Flow of actual values---->Transfer of billing documents
(please see the relevant documentation mentioned there to understand the concept in detail)
1. Assign Value Field - KE4I
2. Assign Quantity Field - KE4M
3. Reset Value and Quantity Field - KE4W
In SPRO Transaction follow the below mentioned path and carry out the settings

Is this the right product for me?

Hi All
Just considering Contribute and was wondering if this is the right product for my needs.
I've built a web site and need to add a retrofit CMS type function to some pages.
There's news, products and general page editing.
I can see News being straightforwards in Ct but not sure about the rest. It appears that an editor requires Ct whether they want to edit in a browser or not. Is this the case? Sort of defeats the purpose for browser editing doesn't it?
Any comments are much appreciated.
Thanks

ARD will not allow you print from your home system to your printers at work either. You could transfer the documents from your home system to your work system and then print, but you don't need ARD for that. File sharing, for transferring the documents, and the Screen Sharing built into Mac OS X 10.5 and 10.6 to take control of the work computer, would be all you need and wouldn't cost you anything additional.
If, however, you need the ability to "curtain" the screen at work, then you would need ARD. Another, somewhat less expensive, option would be Timbuktu.
Regards.

Billing user exit for partner determination/substitution

Hi ,
For my SAP ERP , I need a Billing user exit for partner determination/substitution .
If somebody has the info .
Thank's

Hi,
User Exits For Billing:
- USEREXIT_NUMBER_RANGE (Module pool SAPLV60A, program RV60AFZZ)
The internal number range used in the standard system is specified
in the billing type table and can be changed in this user exit. This
user exit is only called when the billing documents is created.
- USEREXIT_ACCOUNT_PREP_KOMKCV (Module pool SAPLV60A, program RV60AFZZ)
In this user exit additional fields for account determination that
are not provided in the standard system are copied into
communication structure KOMKCV (header fields).
- USEREXIT_ACCOUNT_PREP_KOMPCV (Module pool SAPLV60A)
In this user exit additional fields for account determination that
are not provided in the standard system are copied into
communication structure KOMPCV (item fields).
- USEREXIT_NUMBER_RANGE_INV_DATE (Module pool SAPLV60A, program RV60AFZC)
Depending on the number range, table TVFKD is used to set the
billing date (country-specific requirments in Italy).
USEREXIT_NUMBER_RANGE is automatically deactivated when this user
exit is being applied.
- USEREXIT_FILL_VBRK_VBRP (Module pool SAPLV60A, program RV60AFZC)
This user exit is only called when the billing document is created.
It is used to provide the header and the item of the new billing
document with deviating or additional data.
- USEREXIT_PRINT_ITEM (Module pool SAPLV61A, program RV61AFZB)
Printing the item line of a billing document can be supplemented or changed.
- USEREXIT_PRINT_HEAD (Modulpool SAPLV61A, Programm RV61AFZB)
Printing the header line of a billing document can be supplemented or changed.
- User exits in program RV60AFZD
Short descriptions of the user exits are contained in the program:
- USEREXIT_RELI_XVBPAK_AVBPAK
- USEREXIT_NEWROLE_XVBPAK_AVBPAK
- USEREXIT_NEWROLE_XVBPAP_AVBPAK
The following user exits are available in report SAPLV60B for transfer to accounting (function group V60B):
- EXIT_SAPLV60B_001: Change the header data in the structure acchd
You can use this exit to influence the header information of the accounting document. For example, you can change the business transaction, "created on" date and time, the name of the person who created it or the transaction with which the document was created.
- EXIT_SAPLV60B_002: Change the customer line ACCIT
You can use this exit to change the customer line in the accounting document. This exit is processed once the ACCIT structure is filled in with data from document header VBRK.
- EXIT_SAPLV60B_003: Change the customer line in costing
The customer line is filled in differently for costing. You can use exit 003 to influence the ACCIT structure.
- EXIT_SAPLV60B_004: Change a GL account item ACCIT You can add information to a GL account item (such as quantity specifications) with this exit.
- EXIT_SAPLV60B_005: User exit for accruals
Once all relevant data for accruals was entered in the GL account item, you can add to this data with this exit.
- EXIT_SAPLV60B_006: Change the control line ACCIT
You can use exit 006 to add information to the control line.
- EXIT_SAPLV60B_007: Change the installment plan
You can use exit 007 to add information to the installment plan parameters in the GL account item.
- EXIT_SAPLV60B_008: Change the transfer structure ACCCR, ACCIT and ACCHD After the accounting document is filled in with data, you can use exit 008 to change the document once again.
- EXIT_SAPLV60B_010: Item table for customer lines
You can use exit 10 to influence the contents of customer lines before they are created.
- EXIT_SAPLV60B_0011: Change the parameter for cash account determination or reconciliation account determination
You can use this exit to change inbound parameters in order to influence account determination.
Hope this will help.
Regards,
Ferry Lianto
Please reward points if helpful.

Issue in Transfer of Billing document to GTS

Hi Experts,
I have a question on the transfer of billing documents and the creation of customs declaration. All the documents are struck in the ECC queue and not transferred automatically to GTS system. The problem is that when I manually push them in SM58 it is procesing immediately but the program RSARFCEX is not picking the entries and posting them. Also there are lots of errored entried in the SM58 for this destination.
Kindly help me.
Regards,
Vijay V

This issue is resolved. This was due to the large error entries in the SM58 for the specific destination. We have reorganised the trfc queues and now it works perfectly.
Regards,
Vijay V

Intercompany stock transfer without billing

Hi experts,
I have one issue. We want to map intercompany stock transfer for spares and consumables without billing.
Is it possible in SAP? If possible can anybody tell the business process step by step with transaction?
points will be awarded
Regards,
Santosh

Hi,
normally, the intercompany stock transfer process is not billing relevant, but the
cross company stock transfer is billing relevant;
step-by-step process for intercompany stock transfer:
======================================
the question is if you want to do the process with or without a delivery, in one step or two steps...
one of the processes is following (with delivery - two step):
1) me21n -> create purchase order (UB)
2) vl10b -> create outbound delivery (NL) and post goods issue within vl02n (movement type 641
-->> after this step, the material will be in stock in transit
3) migo -> A01 post goods receipt - R05 with reference to outbound delivery
(you can also do it with reference to the purchase order, but you could have changed something within the delivery -> check note 326539)
-->> if you would need an inbound delivery for your process, this is also possible, and you can also create it automatically)
(you can check notes 421276, 490865, 497287, 965176 regarding this)
if you want to do it with delivery with one step
you just have to do point 1) and 2) -> here with movement type 647, that also makes the post goods receipt and you do not have to do point 3)
if you want to do a stock transfer process without delivery,
you should post goods issue and receipt with migo with reference to the purchase order
you could also check notes 498143, 842829 for more information, f.e. about customizing settings
hope I could help you,
regards,
Ely

Intercompany stock transfer: IV billing documents creates FI document with

Hi,
Intercompany stock transfer: IV billing documents creates FI document with wrong vendor.
How can I make sure that the correct vendor is posted in the selling company code?
Best regards,
Eric.

Hi Jürgen,
I also tried this option but then the following error appeared:
"Message no. F5598: Posting keys for account determination for transaction BUV do not exist".
Some point is forcing the PGI to ask for BUV operation (Tx. OBYA).
Thank you for your contribution.

Config of billing type G2 for Revenue Recognition

Hello Experts.
I have a situation where I need to configure billing of credits for revenue recognition.
For normal builling we have copied doc type SO to ZBCS and added ZTAD item category (copied from TAD) for the RR.
To do this for credits I copied doctype CR to ZBCR and assigned ZTAD item category to it.
When billing the ZBCR not I get the message "Item category ZBCR ZTAD cannot be invoiced with billing type G2".
How can G2 be configured to allow this?
This is G2's current setup.
Billing Type G 2 C red tM e m o Created by
Number systems
No.range int.assgt. 19 Item no.increment 0
General control
SD document categ. O C re dit m emo Posting Block
Transaction group 7 B il lin g doc um ent s Statistics
Billing category
Document type DG C us tom er cr ed it me mo
Negative posting N o neg at ive p ost in g
Branch/Head office C us tom er =Pa ye r/B ra nch =s old -t o p ar ty
Credit memo w/ValDat N o
Invoice list type
Rebate settlement Rel.for rebate
AcctDetermProc. KOF I0 0 A cco unt De e rm n ato n
Doc. pric. procedure
Acc. det. rec. acc.
Acc. det. cash. set.
Acc. det. pay. cards
Output/partners/texts
Output determ.proc. Z10 00 0 B il lin g Out pu t Application V 3
Item output proc.
Output Type
Header partners FK B iln g D ocu m en t
Item partners FP B il lin g Ite m
TextDetermProcedure 03 Invo c e hea de r
Text determ.proc.itm
Delivery text

Hi,
You may be maually given the PR00 in ZBCR. But in your copy control (VTFA) --> item category ZTAD --> pricing type, you may be maintained B (Carry out new pricing).
If you maintain B, you have to change it to "D ".
When you maintain B, the system will search the Pricing again in Credit memo. All manual prices will be lost.
Thanks
M. Lakshmi Narasimhan

Bank transfer using biller direct

Hi
Could you please let me know the details in step by step involved during processing a payment using bank transfer using biller direct.
Answers will be awarded immediately. Appreciate quick help.
Thanks
Rajanikanth

Lora,
You may want to try the SAP Business One Discussion Forum to see if there are SAP Business One Partners who know of this being done at ...
SAP Business One Application
... or you can check the SAP Partner Catalog where you can search for add-on solutions for SAP Business One at ...
http://preview.sap.com/catalog/index.jsp
... if you are an SAP Partner.
Eddy

Hi. i have the sony hifi system "sony" a projector "sony" and the mac mini. the visual i have. the sound i don't. all is hdmi connected. apple is a new product for me. what settings fiddle with? please assist

i would like to know what settings i should use to able sound on my mac mini.
apple is a new product for me.
I've got a sony hifi with a sony projector. projector works fine. i do not have sound though.
they are all connected via hdmi.
please assist.

When you go System Preferences>Sounds>Output What output is selected?

Queries in Production for Business Users

Hello fellow SAP Security Colleagues,
I am familiar with some of the obvious reasons why query development and execution should be restricted in production and have generally agreed with the restrictions.
However, I wanted to reach out to those of you who have supported a project which either:
     A.) allowed business users to create and execute queries in production /or/
     B.) allowed queries to be developed and transported to production for use by business users.
I would like more information on how this is working out for your company and what steps you are taking to make it work securely and with little performance issues.
Thank you so much for your feedback!
Edited by: Teresa Lansberry on Feb 5, 2009 3:46 PM
Edited by: Teresa Lansberry on Feb 5, 2009 3:47 PM
Edited by: Teresa Lansberry on Feb 5, 2009 3:48 PM

Hi Teresa,
I agree with Julius and Auke, but have a fair amount of experience of working with companies who disagree....
At my current client we have a small project taking place to rationalise the use of queries.
Until recently almost all users had the access to create and change queries in the production environment. There are approximately 3000 queries and 1500 infosets used, created, 50% of which are used over the previous 12 months. The result of this is that many reporting controls are bypassed and there are many "versions of the truth".
For legal reasons we now need to secure the data. This also requires robust change control over the queries. The existing queries were transported into the development environment and access to maintain queries has been removed in Prod.
All new queries are created by a functional expert and then handed over to the development team. The dev team review the query (make sure that it is reasonably efficient etc) and then put in auth checks into the infoset. This is then tested and only when signed off, is transported into the Prod.
It's not an ideal situation but until most of the reporting has been moved to BI, is reasonably controlled. What it rarely addresses is the need for consistent reporting.

Why no controls on My Mac Pro display for the 9/12 event?

Why no controls on My Mac Pro display for the 9/12 event? I thought it odd that I had no conrols for the event (later in the day) - Just something Apple was trying different. - It was frustrating that I could not pause it , and later, jump to the point where it crashed. (anybody else have that problem?) But later I had my wife look at it on her 24" iMac, and the controls were present and it worked fine. I thought it might be because I had turn off Java; I turned it on and tried it, still no fade in on mouse move controls. Anybody have an idea why? (Apple STILL needs to update the product list on this submit page This is ML 10.8)

After 3 more days, and a reboot, still no controls on THIS video. Everything else seems fine. Even the Apple movie trailers with the same type of "floating" controls work properly. Does anybody have a clue?

Semifin Production for internal AND external customers

One of our plants produces semifin goods that are then transferred via Stock Transport Orders to other plants that finish them up.
That plant would like to be able to also sell these same materials to outside customers. Normally, we would use PIRs for that purpose, however, these materials are all set up as dependent requirements, to be produced against STOs entered at the other plants.
How could we create some additional requirements for production for external customers? Right now we have been using a defunct plant and created STOs from there, but it doesn't really work, especially the billing side of it. We considered creating a Sales Order Type that can be entered ahead of time to produce against. I don't know much about the S&D side, and the dude that tried that finally gave up.
Is there an easier solution that would take care of this situation?
Thanks,
MMPP

This sounds strange. STOs - independently from planning startegy - are present as requirements in standard system.
Perhaps in your standard system. Our standard system for FG production is set up as MTS strategy 11, and no, STO's are not taken into account there, as strange as it sounds.
If you use planning strategy 40 you can work with PIRs, SOs, STOs paralelly. You can even achieve to force STOs to behave as SOs (I mean to consume PIRs based on master data settings) in this strategy.
Stock transport orders in planning strategy 40 - consume PIR
Yes, but I can not use strategy 40. Like I mentioned, we deal with perishable goods, and can not make existing stock part of the MRP calculation.
In my opinion you should revise your way of thinking / current pratice since you would gain more profit if you applied standard scenarios instead of force something that cannot be defined exactly.
I am sorry that our situation is different from what you define as your standard scenario.
I mean if your SFGs are considered as FGs (because you sell them to external customers) you should handle them accordingly.
It is probably a bit difficult to understand. But these are semifinished goods that we want to sell to outside customers (who might treat them as raw materials). Not everything in this world can be clearly divided into three categories. Again, I apologize that our situation doesn't conform to what you consider standard.
Why do you want to work only with DepReqs? I cannot understand this...
98% of what that plant will produce are DepReqs = semifinished goods to fulfill STOs from other plants. Does that explain it somewhat?
As I said you should handle the materials as they are handled in reality.
I appreciate your reply... it's a good answer, just not to my question.

Control Transfer of Bills of Product for Preference

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for