Correct Functional Area

Hi All,
We are using Functional Area in ECC mapping it to Cost Centers. However, we are facing 2 issues:
1. In case the CC is changed in the document before posting the document, SAP does not re-determine FA. This can be overcome by manually deleting the FA while changing the CC. However, please suggest if we can have an automated way (tried substitution but it does not seem to work).
2. There are some already posted which have incorrect FA. How can these docs be corrected? Tried using the program RFCORRFA to correct but this erases the FA but does not determine the correct FA.
Any suggestion for the two issues?
Thanks
Anita

Per documentation of RFCORRFA (below), it should do the necessary fix. Please debug/check CC-FA assignments. Else would raise the issue with SAP support.
-Prasad Kosuru
*& Report  RFCORRFA                                                    *
*& This report corrects the functional area in the BSEG table
*& (Field BSEG-FKBER):
*& The derivation of the functional area is processed anew and
*& the new functional area is then stored in the FI documents (in the
*& BSEG-table).
*& The report works in the following way:
*& 1) The FI documents are selected from the BSEG and BKPF tables.
*& 2) The selected entries are transformed into ACCIT and ACCHD
*&    structures temporarily in the memory.
*& 3) The logic for deriving the functional area is processed
*&    (this logic for deriving the functional area works based on
*&    the ACCIT and ACCHD structures).
*& This reports works well for all FI documents which were posted
*& directly in FI, e.g. using the FB01 transaction, since all
*& information of the posting is available in the BSEG and BKPF tables.
*& But a wrong functional area might be derived for FI documents which
*& were originally posted in other modules, e.g. in MM:
*& For such FI documents the complete information of the original
*& MM posting is NOT available: The original ACCIT and ACCHD entries
*& cannot be recreated any more by using only the information which
*& is stored in the BSEG/BKPF tables.
*& Hence please use this report only for FI documents which were
*& posted in FI and not for those which were posted in other modules
*& like FI.
*& Please note: In most cases this report will work fine also for
*& FI documents from MM etc., since the most common fields like
*& account, cost center category etc. will be filled for all documents.
*& If the report does not fullfill your needs, maybe because
*& the derivation of functional areas for documents from MM
*& does not work as desired, please proceed as described in
*& OSS note nr. 115840.

Similar Messages

  • After CC update today the lens corrections functions are switched

    Chromatic aberration and geometric distortion functions work backwards. Check chromatic and it affects geometric. Check geometric and it affects chromatic. Is anyone else having this issue?

    Hi Mark.
    I have the same problem, but it works when i set the windows settings for the font and icons to 100% instead of 125% (standard) which is not optimal.
    Do you have an other solution?
    My specs are:
    Windows 8.1 laptop X4578 15,6'' gaming bærbar | MM Vision
    1920x1080 screen
    Intel Core I7-4710MQ
    Nvidia Geforce GTX 870M with geforce 344.11 driver (the latest)

  • Functional Areas (FA) in Profit Center Accounting (PCA)

    Dear all,
    We use Functional Areas (FA) to separate fixed costs in Profit Center Accounting (PCA). Originally, in FI, fixed costs are posted with Cost Center which is linked to FA. Now we find out that some cost centers missed their link to FA and hence not all fixed costs transferred to FA in PCA. We fixed the missed links, but the main question now is, how can we transfer information about FA for already existing documents? Is there any way to update profit center documents and totals? Or erase and transfer them once again?
    Thanks in advance for the answers.

    Please see the following SAP note. I corrected my ledger with help of Following Note
    1- 106180 (Correcting functional areas in the PCA Ledger)
    2-677630 (Correcting functional areas in FI documents)
    3- 115840 (Correcting functional areas in special purpose ledgers)
    4- 87064 (Reconciliation Ledger: Cost-of-Sales Accounting Problems)

  • Would like to use an alarm clock.  I need the alarm clock to function from the sleep mode.  A review said that MAC products will not allow a program to wake up a Mac.  Is this correct ?  Are there any products in the Mac store what will function from the

    Would like to use an alarm clock.  I need the alarm clock to function from the sleep mode.  A review said that MAC products will not allow a program to wake up a Mac.  Is this correct ?  Are there any products in the Mac store what will function from the sleep mode ?  How do I check this out ?

    You can set times for your computer to turn on or wake from sleep in the Energy Saver system preference pane using the Schedule... button.

  • Functional area inconsistency while creating a PO

    Hi Experts,
    The problem occurs when you create a PO. When a PO is created, multiple tables are updated. I checked that the value of Functional area in below screenshot comes from table COAS which is correct.
    Double click on Order:
    Now, when you try to do MIGO on this PO, the Functional area comes up as EQSV. This value comes from table EKKN:
    I have been told that it should be CAPX in the MIGO screen. I want a confirmation if there seems to be any issue from Functional side first as i am from ABAP.
    Please help if you have any idea why this could be happening.

    Hi Mukhthar,
    I got this checked with my FI consultant and you are right. The Cost Center Category of Cost center was set as G and accordingly the substitution was setting the Functional area. Thank you.
    Divya

  • How to post cost of goods sold to io per functional area and account determ

    1. We create a sales order with reference to a revenue IO with functional area ABC01.
    2. We create a delivery document on the sales order and goods issue XYZ.
    3. We expect the cost of goods sold for the coal to hit an existing IO with functional area ABC02 based on account determination for XYZ.
    4. Instead we see both the revenue and the COGS hitting the revenue IO on the Sales roder.
    5. For now, the accountants responsible for those companies have been making journal entries all along to correct the postings.
    Please advise what needs to be done for step 3 to happen so that the extra step 5 need not be done.
    (IO - internal order)
    Thanks,
    Venkat

    What is the IO you have assigned in the Sales Order please?
    Just check the Sales Order - Account assignement, so that you can able to change if there is a different IO.
    System won't pick up IO automayically until unless you secify in Sales order to done OKB9 settings.
    Chek the above
    Thanks

  • Financial statement  version:functional area

    Hi,
    I created a financial statement  version with functional area and run it(S_PL0_86000032 ) , most items are correct, however, the item which assigned function area always 0, this means that system can not get any data via function area. would anyone help me?
    Rgds,
    Wubin

    Hello
    If you want to define a financial statement version with functional areas, these functions are limited. You cannot use the following functions:
            Balance-Dependent Display
    You cannot display functional areas dependent on the balance, that is, assign them to a different item dependent on the balance.
    ·        Debit/Credit Shift
    You cannot define items to which you have assigned functional areas as debit/credit shift items.
    ·        Check for Completeness
    You cannot use the check for completeness for financial statement versions with functional areas.
    You also have to carry out the following additional activities:
           1.      When you enter the general data, set the Functional area permitted indicator.
    You then have the option of assigning either accounts or functional areas to an item in your financial statement version.
           2.      Assign the required functional areas or functional area intervals to your P&L items
    Before setting the indicator please go through this help link
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/b5/688b8ea30d11d39759006094b969cf/frameset.htm
    regards

  • Items in template contain errors, only correct items are transferred

    Hi guys,
    When we create SC with items from the old SC the message appears: "Items in template contain errors, only correct items are transferred". I checked SC, there are no error messages. I found that field SOURCE_REL_IND in the table BBP_PDIGP is initial. Can it be the reason of this error message?

    Hello
    I think the old items from the old SC will be validated, and therefore you got this error message.
    I would suggest to uncheck the 'Validate Product Data' (In Additional
    Functions in product catalog tab) for the external catalog in the
    following path:
    spro -> SAP IMG -> Enterprise Buyer -> Master Data ->
    Define Catalogs. Select the catalog, and then 'Goto -> Details'
    Hope this helps,
    Daniel

  • Problem of Functional Area in Allocation

    Dear All
    We want to allocate some ADMIN Cost Centres which have "x" Functional Area with Secondary Cost Element (SCE) which *does not*  have any Functional Area to BRAND Cost Centre which doesnot have any Functional Area using a Secondary Cost Element (SCE) which has "Y" Functional Area.
      The Cycle is Dr & Cr the correct cost Centre,and forcing both Functional Are,so in the P&L report in the collector cost centers we see a debit still sitting in FA X (because it didnu2019t clear) and a credit in FA Y (because it was forced).
    We tried everything within the cycle to make this work correctly; derive functional area checked and unchecked, each with forcing correct sender and receiver functional areas within the cycle and even removing the functional area from the SCE "Y" with various options above,but still the problem persists,Can any one Guide how to do ,is there any Note available
    Thanks

    HI,
    check SAPNET note 764485, especially point 2 and 3:
    "2. Set the functional area derivation of characteristics so that the functional area is already derived on the entry screen, and not when you are posting as is the case in earlier releases. For more information, see Note 740519.
    To capitalize the functional area derivation on the entry screen, proceed as follows: Financial Accounting (New) -> Financial Accounting Basic Settings (New) -> Tools -> Customer Enhancements -> Enhance Determination of Functional Area.
    3. To set the update of the functional area in the CO totals tables, proceed as follows: Controlling -> General Controlling -> Include Characteristics in CO Totals Records. You can activate the update of the characteristics can independently."
    Best regards, Christian

  • Built-In PHP Functions Are Not Recognized

    I have a PHP project in Flash Builder for PHP 4.5 which does not recognise any of the PHP in-built functions. I have tested this on a brand new project and still the functions I type are not recognised. So I can't basically auto-complete them or look at what the function definition is.
    Usually the built-in function are listed under "PHP Language Library" > "Core API". But in my PHP projects they don't show at all. Any thoughts?
    I raised this problem with Zend (Which is where I bought the product from) Support and this is what they had to say:
    Unfortunately, Zend not supporting the Flash Builder for PHP.
    You can use the Adobe online forums to find solutions for your technical issues:
    http://forums.adobe.com/community/flash_builder/
    and this:
    Please use the Adobe Forums to report your problem. If the problem is related to Zend part of the product (it definitely looks like this), we will help you to solve this problem - through Adobe Forums. If you browse Adobe Forums, you may have noticed that our staff is quite responsive. Just post your issue there and you will see that routing your request through the correct channel will ensure the fastest resolution.
    So I am hoping Zend/Adobe Engineers are here to help me with the problem I have. Thanks

    Hi Roy,
    Here is the contents of the project .buildpath
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <buildpath>
         <buildpathentry kind="con" path="com.zend.php.phpunit.CONTAINER"/>
         <buildpathentry kind="con" path="org.eclipse.php.core.LANGUAGE"/>
         <buildpathentry kind="src" path=""/>
    </buildpath>
    and .project
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <projectDescription>
         <name>NAV-Contacts-PHP</name>
         <comment></comment>
         <projects>
         </projects>
         <buildSpec>
              <buildCommand>
                   <name>org.eclipse.wst.validation.validationbuilder</name>
                   <arguments>
                   </arguments>
              </buildCommand>
              <buildCommand>
                   <name>org.eclipse.dltk.core.scriptbuilder</name>
                   <arguments>
                   </arguments>
              </buildCommand>
         </buildSpec>
         <natures>
              <nature>org.eclipse.php.core.PHPNature</nature>
              <nature>org.zend.php.framework.ZendFrameworkNature</nature>
         </natures>
    </projectDescription>
    The OS is MacOS X 10.6.7

  • Functional Area

    Dear Experts,
    The Functional Area in the WBS Element --> Basic Data is disabled. Can anyone help me on how to enable the Field Functional Area.
    Regards,
    Shareeq

    You have already checked following:
    1. COS is active for Co Code
    2. Influencing and modificable field settings for FA are correct in OPUK- meaning for your project profile, FA is an input or at least a display field.
    Just check the following also:
    1. Is FA appearing in other objects for this co cd such as Sales order, or service order or production order or maintenance order? This will make sure that COS is correctly activated or not.
    2. Create a new project. Normally once COS is activated, even the closed projects get this field.
    If the above two checks dont suggest any approach, my expereince suggests: please consult SAP notes.
    Thanks,

  • SRM creates purchase requisition with wrong functional area

    Hi,
    We face the situation that we have postings to wrong functional Areas. These postings belong to a PO related GR. The PO originates  to a purchase Requisition. The functional area is can see there iw wrong, too. This seems the initial problem. If I create a PR using the same cost center and account it derives the correct funtional area. The PR is created out of SRM.
    We upgraded this year to EhP6 and it seems the issues started shortly after.
    Any idea how to correct?
    Thanks
    Exberliner

    Hi,
    Hope your BAdI is working now.
    MD51 is used for project. It creates replenishment orders against a WBS element. After this, you can run MD01 which will create replenishment order by material/plant level.
    If you have a question related to PS, maybe you can post your thread in this space:
    SAP Project Systems (SAP PS)
    Kind Regards,
    Mariano

  • Postings in wrong Functional Area

    Hi,
    I have a complicated scenario, i have a service purchase order for a cost center C111 which as a Functional Area F101, during invoice i had changed the cost center to C222 and changed the Functional Area to F101, where the cost center C222 belongs to F202 functional area. The postings have done been and payments was made to the vendor. Now in cost center and profit center report with functional area shows wrong value meaning it should showed as cost center C222 and FA F202, but now the costing reports is incorrect with comibination of C222 and F202
    Now how can i make correction postings, logically the amount should be posted to C222 with F202. I tried in manual reposting and several other options, but failed. We are in ECC 5.0.
    Can somebody help me out in solving this issue.
    Thanks
    Best Regards,
    gj

    Hi,
    Check whether its their any link b/w cost center categories and functional area .
    cost center categories to Functional areas , this is the menu path: SPRO>IMG>Controlling> Cost Center Accounting> Master Data> Cost Center > Define Cost Center Categories
    and check these categories are mentioned in masters.
    Thank you.

  • Functional Area derivation as obligatory checkbox in Cost Center distribution cycle?

    Dear All,
    We are using Cost of Sales accounting with FI-CO online integration. Derivation of Functional Area for Cost Center assessment cycles is an obligatory indicator. Nevertheless I may create Cos Center distribution cycles without this option (what affects FI-CO online integration). Can anybody explain a system logic behind it?
    Can I set Functional Area derivation as an obligatory checkbox for Cost Center distribution cycles too?
    Bartlomiej Seidel

    Hi,
    I have searched for any useful note, but without result so far. The point is that any new distribution or assessment cycle (cost centers) in our company must work with Functional Area derivation (than FI-CO online integration works correctly). With our current SAP setup I must select this indicator for every assessment cycle - it is obligatory. But is not obligatory for distribution cycles - and I don't know why?
    I would like to protect everybody from crating distribution cycles without FA derivation indicator (like it works now for assessment cycles).  How may I do it?
    Bart

  • PCA Functional Area Report Problem With Co-Product Settlements

    I have built a profit center functional area report for use in a manufacturing client.  The reason is because the factory cost centers flow to the product cost (via costing sheets) and the administrative cost centers are expensed monthly.  However, SAP seems to have no other approach to handle the issue where common expense elements must be reported in these two separate sections.  Anyway, here is my problem:
    After creating the functional areas and matching them to each cost center appropriately and then applying a different functional area to orders, I see that settlement of co-products causes my report to zero out the functional area that should match the overhead cost centers.  These obviously should not be impacted by settlement and I see that they are not impacted in the transactional data.  However, the functional area report shows a different story.  I believe it somehow has to do with the unusual way that co-product split up and settle versus other types of orders.  I may need some sort of subtitution rule, but like I said, the raw transactional data looks correct and the report should bring in these values. 
    I used ledger 8A if that helps.  I am sure I missed some small thing somewhere.
    David

    It looks to me like the New G/L may have taken care of some of my issue.  The FI reconciliation G/L account (690000 usually) includes the secondary cost center postings as well as the secondary order postings.  The cost center side of the secondary transaction reflects the functional area for cost centers (Factory Exp or Admin Exp in my case), whereas the order side of the secondary posting shows the functional area associated with order consumption (Net Consumption in our case). 
    This appears to mean that the standard report for Functional Areas from FI should work to break up the income statement for manufacturing purposes.  This report is S_PLO_86000029.  That report looks to me like it will replace my need for a PCA based Functional Area Report.
    David

Maybe you are looking for