Costum Document Not getting picked up by B2B

HI
I was able to process an incoming custom document
Was able to identify the TP, Document Type, and agreement
But now when i check BPEL for processed document, I do not see it
I also check the application message tab in B2B and do not see entry for the document i recieved
Any help is appreciated
thank you

do you think it will be possible to change the channel for this document?
Protocol Transport Binding accept=image/gif, image/x-xbitmap, image/jpeg, image/pjpeg, image/png, */* SSL-Https=on Calypso-Control=H_Req,2130706433, 7785, 127.0.0.1 ClientIP=64.40.232.254 MSG_RECEIVED_TIME=Wed Oct 10 05:19:37 CDT 2012 Chronos=aggregate Oracle-WebCache-Hdr-Inv-Capab=on, version="1" accept-charset=iso-8859-1,*,utf-8 ECID-Context=1.810730193339631;kXhglfDWn5MK9SJBYIEOj4USXURSkVQSoJLPmMSR_KS Proxy-Client-IP=127.0.0.1 content-type=text/xml; charset=iso-8859-1 User-Agent=BW-HTTPClient/5.4 X-Forwarded-For=127.0.0.1 Content-Length=4620 x-weblogic-cluster-hash=TreDIyjqcjNMytWjh/Uyo71TzX4 Host=ecom.forsythe.com Surrogate-Capability=orcl="webcache/1.0 Surrogate/1.0 ESI/1.0 ESI-Inline/1.0 ESI-INV/1.0 ORAESI/9.0.4 OWV/1.0 POST-Restore/1.0" Connection=Keep-Alive X-WebLogic-KeepAliveSecs=30 X-WebLogic-Request-ClusterInfo=true
Message Digest Message Digest
Maybe use something else instead of generic HTTP???
thank you

Similar Messages

File is not getting picking UP by B2B

Hi
I have done a new trading partner setup and I have done below configuration for the new Trading partner. Please find the details
Business Protocol = EDI X12 over Generic Exchange
1) Delivery Channel
2) Document Exchange
3) Transports
4) Transport Server
And I have created below configuration at Host Trading partner side...
1) Delivery Channel
2) Document Exchange
3) Transports
4) Transport Server
After droping the file File is not getting pickup by B2B. And I have tested the .trc file (trace file) and b2b.log file. No entries has been recorded.
Is there any way I can debug to see why B2B is not able to pickup the file.
Regards
Kiran

Ramesh
We are sending 997 to our trading partners.
I believe Host will pickup the file so I have sent up Host level delivery channel to pick the file and I have setup trading partner level Delivery channel to send 997 to them.
Could you please let me know this is correct? If this is correct what could be the problem not able to pickup the file.
Regards
Kiran

File is not getting picked up by B2B

Hi,
I configured b2b as below
1. The trading partner delivery channel to "Generic HTTP 1.0" with transport protocol HTTP and url "http://host:port/b2b/httpReceiver" (this url is working good)
2. Listening channel as "Generic FTP-1.0" and have given the ftp details to read from this ftp host and marked this channel as "Internal"
3. Created agreement with the remote trading partner and selected trading partner's delivery channel (step-1)
4. Deployed the agreement
I copied 850 in above ftp folder where I gave the details for listening channel, but it is not picking the file at all.
Pls suggest did I perform any wrong here. thanks!
Regards,
Suneel Jakka

It is weird. I am able to ftp from b2b box to the ftp server but in the logs it is showing as below
[2012-05-07T07:05:18.526-07:00] [soa_server1] [NOTIFICATION] [] [oracle.soa.bpel.engine.agents] [tid: orabpel.engine.pool-9.thread-1] [userId: <anonymous>] [ecid: 0000JSbbC10Fw000jzwkno1FdxOn000001,0] [APP: soa-infra] Done finding 0 expirable work items for the bpmn engine.
[2012-05-07T07:05:20.764-07:00] [soa_server1] [ERROR] [] [oracle.soa.b2b.engine] [tid: weblogic.work.j2ee.J2EEWorkManager$WorkWithListener@37108526] [userId: <anonymous>] [ecid: 0000JSbbC10Fw000jzwkno1FdxOn000001,1:28346] [APP: soa-infra] Problem Connecting to FTP Endpoint : Permission denied
[2012-05-07T07:05:40.755-07:00] [soa_server1] [WARNING] [] [oracle.soa.services.notification] [tid: TimerFactory] [userId: <anonymous>] [ecid: 0000JSbbC10Fw000jzwkno1FdxOn000001,1:28352] [APP: soa-infra] <.> Notification via email, voice, SMS or IM will not be sent. If you would like to enable them, please configure corresponding sdpmessaging driver. Then modify the accounts and set NotificationMode attribute to either NONE, EMAIL or ALL in workflow-notification-config.xml
[2012-05-07T07:10:18.566-07:00] [soa_server1] [NOTIFICATION] [] [oracle.soa.bpel.engine.agents] [tid: orabpel.engine.pool-5.thread-2] [userId: <anonymous>] [ecid: 0000JSbbC10Fw000jzwkno1FdxOn000001,1:28354] [APP: soa-infra] Done finding 0 expirable work items for the bpel engine

GL Account is not getting picked by billing document

Hi Gurus,
one new GL account is set up by our FI team for a accrual condition type.
case 1:
Now when i have cancelled the previous created billing doc and trying to create again then the new GL account is not getting picked.
case 2:
Whereas when am doing the complete process flow like sales order creation, delivery and billing then the new GL account is getting picked.
Could you please let me know what would be the reason for this, why its not getting picked in first case.
Thanks,
Ashi

Hello Preety,
Unless you see the Revenue Account Determination Analysis for the Billing document, it is very difficult to understand the reason. Please click on the Environment >> Acc.Determination Analysis >> Revenue account in the VF03 screen and find the missing assignment.
Thanks,
Suman$

Delivery document not getting updated

Dear Experts,
Till date our client was using VL04 for creating DA for only domestic sales, now they
are asking to provide facility to created DA for export shipment in VL04 and we have done customization for the same.
Now there are two separate (delivery document number) number ranges generated for
domestic and export sales.
Now my problem is : delivery document number generated for export sales is not getting
updated in database table VTRDI
Have any idea ??
Please advice
R.Karthik
Edited by: Karthik R on Sep 30, 2009 5:31 PM
Edited by: Karthik R on Sep 30, 2009 6:39 PM

Hi Lakshmipathi ,
Thank you so much.....for ur valuable advice !!
I have checked the table LIKP and LIPS ...and the export delivery number is getting saved
in these two tables...
But my problem is with creating shipment in VT01...as delivery number generated for export is not
getting picked in VT01 but for normal domestic orders it is getting picked.
I could not figure out where I went wrong??
could you please guide me on this issue.
R.Karthik
Edited by: Karthik R on Oct 5, 2009 8:46 AM

Delivery document not being picked while creating shipment document

Dear All,
Issue is regarding creation of shipment document.
As i am creating shipment document in VT01N, am unable to get the delivery doc . ie., delivery document is not picked in shipment creation.
I have created a sales order, picking is completed n saved, PGI not yet been done.
Am unable to create a shipment document due to delivery document not being picked.
i/p's will be of great help.
with regards,
Vijayashree

Dear all,
The issue is solved.
As the Route was not picking in Sales Order so the delivery was not picked in shipment creation.
Route determination setting was not correct.
Regards,
Vijayashree

Output Message Type MAHN not getting picked up in PO

Hello Experts
   I have configured customized output type ZMAH (similar to MAHN) for reminder process. When I am creating PO this output type is not getting picked up automatically. If I am maintaining it manually I am able to send message for ME9F (Purchase Order) and ME91F (Reminder) successfully. Upon deremination analysis I am getting this message 502 " Output ignored (requirement 103 not fulfilled) ". Reminder are getting picked up from Purchase Value Key to PO.
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks
Ankit

Hello Tej
I have maintained output device but same result.
Here I am listing all parameters that I have used for configuration can anyone please take a look and let me know if I am missing anything
Steps for new Message Type for PO Reminder (ZMAH)
1.     Defined new Table 026 Purchasing Output Determination: Document Type
                                                    (ii) 027 Purchasing Output Determination: Purch. Org./Vendor for EDI
2.     Defined new access sequence Z515 Access Sequence for Archiving.
Following are parameters to the Access Sequence
Access Sequence Number = 1
Table = 026
Description = Purchasing Output Determination: Document Type
Requirement = 103
Exclusive = Yes (box checked)
Access Sequence Number = 2
Table = 027
Description = Purchasing Output Determination: Purch. Org./Vendor for EDI
Requirement = 103
Exclusive = Yes (box checked)
3.     Maintain Output Type ZMAH for PO
General Data
Access Sequence = Z515
Access to condition (Checked)
Multiple Issuing (Checked)
Change Output
Program = SAPFM06P
FORM Routine = ENTRY_NEU
Replacement of Text Symbol
Program = SAPMM06E
FORM Routine = TEXT_SYMBOL_REPLACE
Default Values
Dispatch Time = Send Immediately (when saving application)
Transmission Medium = External Send
Communication Strategy = 0001 (E-mail Document)
Processing Routines
Transmission Medium = 5 (External Send)
Program = SAPFM06P
Form Routine = ENTRY_NEU
Form = MEDRUCK
Partner Roles
Medium = External Send
Funct = VN
Name = Vendor
4.     Fine-Tuned Control: Purchase Order
Oprat. = 3
CType = ZMAH
Name = Output for Reminder
Short Text = Urging letter (expediter)/reminder
Update Print Related Data = Yes (checked)
5.     Maintain Message Determination Schema: Purchase Order
Procedure RMBEF1 (Purchase Order)
Step = 101
Cntr = 3
CTyp = ZMAH
Description = Output for Reminder
Requirement = 103
6.     Assign Schema to Purchase Order
Procedure RMBEF1
7.     Define Partner Roles for Purchase Order
Out. = ZMAH
Med = 5 (External Send)
Funct = VN
Name = Output for Reminder
Name = Vendor
8.     Test Condition Maintained in MN04 (Master Data)
Purch. Org. = 0001
Vendor = 101281
Partner Funct = VN
Medium = 5 (External Send)
Date/Time = 4 Send immediately (when saving application)
Output Device = LP01
Cover Page Text = Reminder PO number &EKKO-EBELN&
Also I have configured Purchasing Value Key, reminders are coming to PO correctly.
Thanks
Ankit

GR based IV" then in MIRO the Cenvat clearing A/c is not getting picked up

If we have creating a PO without checking "GR based IV" then in MIRO the Cenvat clearing A/c is not getting picked up, due to this we are not able to create MIRO document with Excise duty value.
We are using Tax calculation procedure TAXINN.
Regards,
Rama Mohan

Hi,
Check in the following path :
Material Management > Purchase Order > Define screen layout at document level
Choose ME21N for details and check by double clicking the GR/IR control whether GR based invoice verification
is an optional entry.
Regards,
Sadashivan

Billing pricing not getting picked up

I created a sales invoice with reference a sales order. In the sales order the price was getting picked up and was displayed.
Delivery was also created. But when the invoice was created and saved the net value is shown as 0. Price is not getting picked up.
The option which many other consultants has given was to cancel the invoice and re create a new invoice. But we want the price to be picked in the same invoice.
This happened only for 5 invoices which was created on a particular day. These 5 inovices show a net value of 0.
Could you please help me out to resolve this issue.
Thanks very much.

Hi,
Please check if the document pricing procedure is same for Order type and billing type.
If its not same please check what is the pricing procedure system taking for Billing document procedure.
In that pricing procedure check what is the Base price condition type.
Check whether condition records maintained for that condition type.
Iff no records maintain then use VK11 to create new condition records.
Then go to Item data - Conditions in billing document press Update button and use B-Carry out new pricing.
Revert if you need more elaborate explanation.
Best Regards,

Pricing procedure is not getting picked

I have defined a pricing procedure for my service PO and I have created a new PO document type for my service PO. But my pricing procedure is not getting picked up for this PO. please help how to get it resolved.
Regards,
Pankaj

hello pankaj
After defining Calculation schema, ensure that you have defined schema group for vendor and assignment of the same to Purchase organisation.
you can also determine calculation schema for standard POs.
finally goto change vendor and in purchasing Data input schema group in Vendor schema field.
regards
Chetan

Release Strategy for Contract is not getting picked whereas it is ok for PO

Dear Experts,
I have created release strategy for PO with doc type, p.org, net value as chars and frg_ekko as class and release group as 02.
I kept NB,FO,MK and WK as char values. it is working fine for PO's whereas it is not getting picked for Contracts. we need same release strategy for PO as well as for Contract.
Kindly resolve the issue.
Satish

S0004830404 wrote:
Dear Experts,
>
> I have created release strategy for PO with doc type, p.org, net value as chars and frg_ekko as class and release group as 02.
> I kept NB,FO,MK and WK as char values. it is working fine for PO's whereas it is not getting picked for Contracts. we need same release strategy for PO as well as for Contract.
>
> Kindly resolve the issue.
>
> Satish
hi,
use create other characteristic for value CEKKO-GNETW in this use the mk , wk values in value field and assign this characteristic to your class and save.
Thanking you

Index is not getting picked even after providing hint

Hi All
The index pk_sku is not getting picked even after providing the hints when executing the query.Please kindly give me such recommendations.I am providing the information.
select * from
(select /*+ index(s pk_sku) */
      to_char(t.dstamp, 'YYYYmmDDHH24MI') as sort_1,
      t.client_id as CLIENT_ID ,
      t.site_id as SITE_ID,
      tz.time_zone_name as TIME_ZONE_NAME     ,
      t.owner_id as OWNER_ID,
      t.sku_id as SKU_ID,
      t.reason_id as ADJUST_TYPE,
      to_char(t.dstamp+tz.diff/24, 'DD/mm/YYYY HH24:MI') as ADJUST_DATETIME,
      t.reference_id as RECEIPT_ID,
      t.batch_id as BATCH_ID,
      t.update_qty as UPDATE_QTY,
      t.lock_code as LOCK_CODE,
      s.description as SKU_DESCRIPTION
from mv_inventory_transaction t
      JOIN timezone tz ON tz.site_id = t.site_id ,
       mv_sku s
where   t.sku_id= s.sku_id
and     t.client_id=s.client_id
and   ( :client is null or :client = t.client_id)
and    ( :site is null or t.site_id in (:site))
and    ( :owner is null or t.owner_id in (:owner))
and    t.code= 'Adjustment'
and   (t.dstamp+tz.diff/24) between to_date(:dateFrom, 'DD/mm/yyyy') and to_date(:dateTo,'DD/mm/yyyy')+1
and      (:sku is null or t.sku_id in (:sku))
UNION ALL
(select /*+ index(s pk_sku) */
     to_char(t.dstamp, 'YYYYmmDDHH24MI') as sort_1,
    t.client_id as CLIENT_ID ,
      t.site_id as SITE_ID,
                      tz.time_zone_name as TIME_ZONE_NAME     ,
      t.owner_id as OWNER_ID,
      t.sku_id as SKU_ID,
      t.reason_id as ADJUST_TYPE,
      to_char(t.dstamp+tz.diff/24, 'DD/mm/YYYY HH24:MI') as ADJUST_DATETIME,
      t.reference_id as RECEIPT_ID,
      t.batch_id as BATCH_ID,
      t.update_qty as UPDATE_QTY,
      t.lock_code as LOCK_CODE,
      s.description as SKU_DESCRIPTION
from mv_inventory_transaction_arch t
      JOIN timezone tz ON tz.site_id = t.site_id,
       mv_sku s
where   t.sku_id= s.sku_id
and     t.client_id=s.client_id
and   ( :client is null or :client = t.client_id)
and    ( :site is null or t.site_id in (:site))
and    ( :owner is null or t.owner_id in (:owner))
and    t.code= 'Adjustment'
and   (t.dstamp+tz.diff/24) between to_date(:dateFrom, 'DD/mm/yyyy') and to_date(:dateTo,'DD/mm/yyyy')+1
and      (:sku is null or t.sku_id in (:sku))
order by sort_1,2,3,4,5
version = Release 10.1.0.5.0
SQL> sho parameter optimizer
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
optimizer_dynamic_sampling           integer     2
optimizer_features_enable            string      10.1.0.5
optimizer_index_caching              integer     0
optimizer_index_cost_adj             integer     100
optimizer_mode                       string      ALL_ROWS
sho parameter db_file_multiblock_count_read
sho parameter cursor_sharing
SQL> sho parameter optimizer
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
optimizer_dynamic_sampling           integer     2
optimizer_features_enable            string      10.1.0.5
optimizer_index_caching              integer     0
optimizer_index_cost_adj             integer     100
optimizer_mode                       string      ALL_ROWS
SQL> sho parameter db_file_multi
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
db_file_multiblock_read_count        integer     16
SQL> sho parameter cursor_sharing
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
cursor_sharing                       string      EXACTExplain plan
| Id | Operation                              | Name                          | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                       |                               |    56 | 29736 |   345K (1)| 01:09:07 |
|   1 | SORT ORDER BY                         |                               |    56 | 29736 |   345K (1)| 01:09:07 |
|   2 |   VIEW                                 |                               |    56 | 29736 |   345K (1)| 01:09:07 |
|   3 |    UNION-ALL                           |                               |       |       |            |          |
|   4 |     NESTED LOOPS                       |                               |     2 |   984 | 29686   (1)| 00:05:57 |
|   5 |      HASH JOIN                         |                               |     1 |   326 | 26870   (1)| 00:05:23 |
|   6 |       TABLE ACCESS FULL                | TIMEZONE                      |     4 |    88 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   7 |       VIEW                             | MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION      |    25 | 7600 | 26866   (1)| 00:05:23 |
|   8 |        UNION-ALL                       |                               |       |       |            |          |
|   9 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 10 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION      |     1 |    67 | 24327   (1)| 00:04:52 |
| 11 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | IDX_CODE_CLIENTID_690         | 79681 |       |   518   (1)| 00:00:07 |
| 12 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 13 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION      |    24 | 2328 | 2539   (1)| 00:00:31 |
| 14 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | IDX_CODE_646                  | 9269 |       |    46   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 15 |      VIEW                              | MV_SKU                        |    37 | 6142 | 2816   (1)| 00:00:34 |
| 16 |       UNION-ALL                        |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 17 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL            | MV_SKU                        |   335K|    10M| 2535   (1)| 00:00:31 |
| 18 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL            | MV_SKU                        | 37839 | 1699K|   280   (1)| 00:00:04 |
| 19 |     NESTED LOOPS                       |                               |    54 | 26568 |   315K (1)| 01:03:10 |
| 20 |      HASH JOIN                         |                               |     1 |   326 |   313K (1)| 01:02:37 |
| 21 |       TABLE ACCESS FULL                | TIMEZONE                      |     4 |    88 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 22 |       VIEW                             | MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH |   576 |   171K|   313K (1)| 01:02:37 |
| 23 |        UNION-ALL                       |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 24 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 25 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH |     1 |    72 | 19258   (1)| 00:03:52 |
| 26 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | QUI_IDX_INVTRANS_ARC1         | 36016 |       |   287   (1)| 00:00:04 |
| 27 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 28 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH |   575 | 55200 |   293K (1)| 00:58:45 |
| 29 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | QUI_IDX_INVTRANS_ARC1         |   367K|       | 3466   (1)| 00:00:42 |
| 30 |      VIEW                              | MV_SKU                        |    37 | 6142 | 2816   (1)| 00:00:34 |
| 31 |       UNION-ALL                        |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 32 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL            | MV_SKU                        |   335K|    10M| 2535   (1)| 00:00:31 |
| 33 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL            | MV_SKU                        | 37839 | 1699K|   280   (1)| 00:00:04 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------when put in sql tuning advisor,It recommended with better plan using indexes
| Id | Operation                              | Name                          | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                       |                               |    56 | 29736 |   340K (1)| 01:08:01 |
|   1 | SORT ORDER BY                         |                               |    56 | 29736 |   340K (1)| 01:08:01 |
|   2 |   VIEW                                 |                               |    56 | 29736 |   340K (1)| 01:08:01 |
|   3 |    UNION-ALL                           |                               |       |       |            |          |
|   4 |     NESTED LOOPS                       |                               |     2 |   848 | 26900   (1)| 00:05:23 |
|   5 |      HASH JOIN                         |                               |     1 |   326 | 26898   (1)| 00:05:23 |
|   6 |       TABLE ACCESS FULL                | TIMEZONE                      |     4 |    88 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   7 |       VIEW                             | MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION      |    25 | 7600 | 26894   (1)| 00:05:23 |
|   8 |        UNION-ALL                       |                               |       |       |            |          |
|   9 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 10 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION      |     1 |    67 | 24352   (1)| 00:04:53 |
| 11 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | IDX_CODE_CLIENTID_690         | 79681 |       |   518   (1)| 00:00:07 |
| 12 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 13 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION      |    24 | 2328 | 2542   (1)| 00:00:31 |
| 14 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | IDX_CODE_646                  | 9269 |       |    46   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 15 |      VIEW                              | MV_SKU                        |    37 | 3626 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 16 |       UNION-ALL PARTITION              |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 17 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MV_SKU                        |     1 |    34 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 18 |         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN              | PK_SKU                        |     1 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 19 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MV_SKU                        |     1 |    46 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 20 |         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN              | PK_SKU                        |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 21 |     NESTED LOOPS                       |                               |    54 | 22896 |   313K (1)| 01:02:38 |
| 22 |      HASH JOIN                         |                               |     1 |   326 |   313K (1)| 01:02:38 |
| 23 |       TABLE ACCESS FULL                | TIMEZONE                      |     4 |    88 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 24 |       VIEW                             | MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH |   576 |   171K|   313K (1)| 01:02:38 |
| 25 |        UNION-ALL                       |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 26 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 27 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH |     1 |    72 | 19269   (1)| 00:03:52 |
| 28 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | QUI_IDX_INVTRANS_ARC1         | 36016 |       |   287   (1)| 00:00:04 |
| 29 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 30 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH |   575 | 55200 |   293K (1)| 00:58:47 |
| 31 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | QUI_IDX_INVTRANS_ARC1         |   367K|       | 3466   (1)| 00:00:42 |
| 32 |      VIEW                              | MV_SKU                        |    37 | 3626 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 33 |       UNION-ALL PARTITION              |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 34 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MV_SKU                        |     1 |    34 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 35 |         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN              | PK_SKU                        |     1 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 36 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MV_SKU                        |     1 |    46 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 37 |         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN              | PK_SKU                        |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------So ,after checking the recommended plan I tried to execute the query with the hints,even then it is picking up the indexes in the explain plan.So please kindly help in solving the issue
The pk_sku is the index created on client_id and sku_id columns
Thanks
GV

riedelme wrote:
My experience is differernt - hints will be followed if the optimizer determines they will be beneficial and not if they will not, including my current project on 11gR2. The example below (unfortunately only 11gR1) disproves your theory, showing the index hint is followed and that the cost increases by a factor of five.
The most common cases of the optimizer apparently ignoring a hint are due to operator error, the hint is not well formed, or cannot be followed. There are a couple of documented cases where a hint will be ignored - first_rows used in CTAS is one.
Jonathan Lewis writes a lot about it on his blog showing that the optimizer always acts on a well formed hint if it is at all possible.
SQL> create table t (n number not null, c varchar2(1000));
Table created.
SQL> insert into t select 1, rpad('x',1000,'x')
2 from dual connect by level <= 50000;
50000 rows created.
SQL> create index t_ix on t (n);
Index created.
SQL> exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(user, 't', cascade => true)
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> explain plan for
2 select max(c) from t where n =1;
Explained.
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 2966233522
| Id | Operation          | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT   |      |     1 | 1004 | 1574   (1)| 00:00:19 |
|   1 | SORT AGGREGATE    |      |     1 | 1004 |            |          |
|* 2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL| T    | 50000 |    47M| 1574   (1)| 00:00:19 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
   2 - filter("N"=1)
14 rows selected.
SQL> explain plan for
2 select /*+ index (t t_ix) */ max(c) from t where n = 1;
Explained.
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 3231292748
| Id | Operation                    | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT             |      |     1 | 1004 | 7244   (1)| 00:01:27 |
|   1 | SORT AGGREGATE              |      |     1 | 1004 |            |          |
|   2 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T    | 50000 |    47M| 7244   (1)| 00:01:27 |
|* 3 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN          | T_IX | 50000 |       |    98   (0)| 00:00:02 |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   3 - access("N"=1)
15 rows selected.

In EBS document not get auto clear Algorithms 11

In Electronic bank statment document not get clear automatically while batch run.
I update check no to payment document. even though it is not get auto clear.
in OT51 assign Interpretation Algorithms 11 011:(Outgoing check: Check number not identical to document number)
why it is not get auto clear with check number.

011 = Outgoing check: Check number not identical to document number
012 = Outgoing check: Check number identical to document number
The "document number" in the descriptions is the payment document number - the FI doc that cleared the invoice. If you use the payment document number as the check number - and thus that is the number the bank includes in the bank statement - then you would use algorithm 012. If you create a check in the check register that is a different number than the payment document - and the check number is the number in the bank statement - then you would use algorithm 011.
Search SAP Help for a document titled "Interpretation Algorithms". This document includes descriptions of all the standard interpretation algorithms.
Regards,
Shannon

File not getting picked with Sender Adapter

Hello Experts,
i have configured file sender adapter which is polling configured directory every 60 sec. But i could see file not getting picked up. when looked into Communication channel monitoring i could see following error:
Putting message into send queue failed, due to: com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.DuplicateMessageException : Message ID aa2ec9a0-44b3-11dc-9c5b-0003baa19669(OUTBOUND) already exists in database: com.sap.sql.DuplicateKeyException: ORA-00001: unique constraint (SAPDX1DB.SYS_C00120924) violated.
is this due to adapter cache. we are on SP20.
has anybody faced this problem earlier?
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Rajeev

Hello
actually there was small problem in file generation and hence it was failing in message mapping which is resolved. but still that problem is there when it is attempting to delete the file. hence it is not able to delete that file.
can we manually clear the send queues or should we refresh CPA cache?
Thanks
Rajeev

Controlling Document Not Getting Posted

Dear All,
We have a peculiar scenario of Controlling Document not getting posted. Any pointers on wat could be the issue will be highly helpful.
Scenario:
We have an interface which posts an accounting document.
Dr. Expense
Cr. Balance Sheet.
The Cost Center is supplied thru the interface and FI document and Profit Center Document is posted without any issues. However, CO document is not generated, not sure wat could be the issue. We have performed the basic checks. Also, for the same expense account, we observe some postings have gone into CO where are some didnt'. The difference between documents posted with corresponding CO and documents without corrsponding CO posting is only the "Transaction Key". When we maintain blank Transaction key.. the system posts CO document, when transaction key is "WRX" for that specific GL the system doesn't post.
Not sure why Standard SAP behaves like that. Please advice wat items i need to check to resolve
this.
regards
Diwakar

Hello,
Make sure in OBYC, for key WRX, you have maintained the GL accounts.
Regards,
Ravi

Costum Document Not getting picked up by B2B

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for