Could I redirect a message passing by the conversion channel
I Have IMS 5.2 p1, and I am searching about how I can forward a message to a certain mailbox depending on the message attachment. I can only delete the attachment, or hold the message. but cannot redirect the message to another destination recipient ?
Is there a way to do this ?
Please if anyone could help, it is very urgent.
Thanks.
I Have IMS 5.2 p1, and I am searching about how I can
forward a message to a certain mailbox depending on
the message attachment. I can only delete the
attachment, or hold the message. but cannot redirect
the message to another destination recipient ? Actually you probably could redirect this by using
a sieve filter easier than a conversion channel.
But it is possible if you write the appropriate
headers replacing the envelope to: be the new
recipient you could "forward" the message I believe.
For detail support of this nature, I suggest
you call support who can better diagnose
what it is you're trying to do and how best
to accomplish it.
>
Is there a way to do this ?
Please if anyone could help, it is very urgent.
Thanks.
Similar Messages
-
Mutiple enqueues to the conversion channel
Hi ,
I did set up a conversion where an AV product
scans an message before sending to the next channel ( basically ims-ms,tcp-local or tcp_intranel ) for delivery.
Recently I noticed that if I send an e-mail to 2 recipients(for instance) , a double copy of the message is enqueued the conversation channel and the AV product scans twice the same message ...
By adding the multiple keywords to the channel option , I can improve things so that if my 2 recipients are to be dequeued to the same channel it is scanned once ( for instance the 2 recipients are to be delivered local delivery)
But if it has to be delivered to 2 different channels ( for instance local and extranet) , it is still scanned twice.
Any option I am missing ? Can I instruct the channel to work only on the envelope of the message ?
Any help appreciated.
ThanksI see there at least 2 reallly good ideas
Yep, that's how the conversion channel works.First one knowning that Sun suggests to use the
conversion channel for AV purpose , scanning based on
recipients rather than envelope is just a fantastic
for system usage.Our recommendations do change, as we incorporate new features, and our partners add new features, too.
Currently, the conversion channel is the recommended route IF the virus scanner is to be run via command-line. There are indeed some tradeoffs involved with the conversion channel, especially the inherent overhead of starting new processes for each message, address expansion before conversion, and such. This puts a limit on maximum throughput.
>
If your virus scanner works via smtp, you can use
the "aliasdetourhost" keyword instead, and send
such before address expansion. this requires
5.2hf2.02 or later.Second one, if my AV does why should I bother using
iMS , I just use my AV/SMTP package ? While we find that most AV packages are very good at AV, most of them (all I have seen), aren't very good at being a well-behaved SMTP server. The skills that are useful for writing an AV package are very different from those required to create a well-behaved SMTP product.
We find that when most folk expose an AV's smtp port to the general internet, you can get lots of problems, including:
Dropped messages
error messages
much higher load on the AV hardware.
To help deal with such, we recommend using Sun JES' MTA to "wrap" the AV system. By accepting all mail with our MTA, you first get the ability to reject mail that's not addressed to actual users, the ability to throttle connections, to "fix" many types of badly-formed messages, etc.
The new "aliasdetourhost" keyword allows you to select an incoming channel's messages to be sent to an AV system and to accept those messages back into the queue, at high performance, without starting up a new process for each message, and only once per message, even if it's addressed to all of your users. . . .
>
Likely a bad idea, but I have no idea what you did. . .
Thanks for the input even without a clear idea. -
Setting up the Conversion Channel
Hello
I am trying to set up the conversion channel for virus scannin using McAfee products and I cannot get it to work. The mail log shows that it is going through the conversion channel but the scanpm.exe does not execute. Any help would be appreicated.
Chris Toledo
City Colleges of ChicagoChris, the conversion channel debugs the same way any other channel debugs.
you can bot both master_debug and slave_debug on the channel definition line, recompile the config, and restart the dispatcher
You then get one file per message as the message flows through the system.
Since there are many ways to implement the conversion channel, and the alternate conversion channel, and some of these depend on the exact version of your messaging server (which you neglected to mention), there's really not a lot I can do, yet, to help you. -
40 L7355 I have the pass for the locked channels on my DTV how to enter it ?
I have I L7355 40'' 3d smart TV.
I have DTV with CA Modul I have 5 scrambled channels - I have the pass for them.
There is no feeld where i can put that code.
When I go to the chanel i stays black and no feeld showes up to enter the code.
I have searched the manual and all the options for the DTV and no place to enter the code was found ?
What to do ? Where to enter the code for my scrambled channels ?
One of my friends have the same TV provider. He have some LG smart tv. When he goes to the channel a feeld showes up and he enters the code.That doesn't appear to be a US model, and this is the forums for Toshiba USA. You may want to contact Toshiba in your region.
- Peter -
"Portable" way to do message passing between threads?
(I posted this on the Apple Developer Forums already, but since that forum is only accessible to registered and paid iPhone developers, I thought it would be nice to put it here as well so as to get some more potential eyeballs on it. I apologize if this kind of "cross-posting" is not kosher/is frowned upon around here.)
Hey everybody,
"Long-time listener, first-time caller," heh.
I've been working for the past 2-3 months on my very first iPhone app. Actually, what I've been working on is a framework that I plan to use in an iPhone app of my own but which I am also trying to write for the "lowest-common-denominator" so that I (and others) can use it in other apps written for both Mac and iPhone.
Not only is this my first time writing an iPhone app, it is my first time writing for any Apple platform. In fact, it is my first time using Objective-C, period. I cannot stress this enough: I am a "n00b." So go easy on me. I also have not worked with threading before this, either, on any platform, so the learning curve for me here is rather significant, I'm afraid. I am NOT afraid of either taking the time to learn something properly OR of rolling up my shirtsleeves and working. However, on account of my experiences so far, I am finding myself (not to flame or anything!) quickly becoming frustrated by and disillusioned with not so much Objective-C itself, but the Foundation frameworks.
So with that said, read on, if you dare...
The basic idea behind my project is that the framework I am writing will present an API to developers which will allow them to write client apps that interact with a particular network appliance or network-aware embedded system. I already have my basic set of classes up and functioning, and the framework works to my satisfaction both on MacOS and iPhoneOS. The platforms I am targeting are MacOS X Tiger 10.4 and later, and iPhoneOS, and up until this point, I've managed to keep a codebase that works on all of the above.
What I wanted to do next was add some multithreaded goodness to the mix. (Woe is me.) I have asynchronous network socket I/O working within the main thread, and it, in fact, works a treat. In my test app on the phone, I've managed to keep the UI nice and responsive by using the main thread's runloop efficiently. But even though TCP async I/O works fine within the main thread, I want to be able to split out and offload the processing of any data received by the app from the appliance to its own thread. (It is possible, and even desirable, for an application using this framework to be connected to multiple appliances simultaneously.)
My idea, in order to try to keep things as simple and as clean as possible, was to implement a wrapper class that presented my other main class as an "actor." So, rather than instantiating my main class, one would create an instance of the wrapper class which would in turn control a single instance of my main class and spawn its own thread that the network connection and all data processing for that particular connection would run within.
(I hope I'm making sense so far...)
Out of the gate, writing a subclass of NSThread sounds like the logical design choice for an "actor-type" thread, but because I was trying to maintain Tiger compatibility, I stuck with +detachNewThreadSelector:etc.
Once I decided to pursue the actor model, though, the main problem presented itself: how to best pass messages between the main thread and all of the "actor" threads that might be spawned?
I stumbled upon -performSelector:onThread:withObject:, and knew instantly that this was exactly what I was looking for. Unfortunately, it doesn't exist on Tiger; only its much more limited little brother -performSelectorOnMainThread:withObject: does. So I kept looking.
All of the pre-Leopard documentation, tutorials, and sample code that I read indicated that to pass messages between threads, I needed to basically pretend that the threads were separate processes and use the expensive Distributed Objects mechanism to get messages back and forth. Unfortunately, even if that WAS a desirable option, iPhoneOS does not have any support for DO! Grrr...
Finally, I thought I found the answer when I ran into a third-party solution: the InterThreadMessaging library from Toby Paterson (available @ http://homepage.mac.com/djv/FileSharing3.html). In this library, the author basically implemented his own version of -performSelector:onThread:withObject: called -performSelector:withObject:inThread:. Sounds close enough, right? And actually, it is pretty darn close. It's made to do exactly what it sounds like, and it does it in a platform-neutral way that works on pre-Leopard systems as well as iPhoneOS, using Mach ports instead of DO.
(...wellll, ALMOST. I discovered after I built a small test app around it that it actually isn't "iPhone-clean." The author used an NSMapTable struct and the NSMap*() functions, which don't exist in iPhoneOS, and he also implemented the handlePortMessage delegate method, but although iPhoneOS has NSPort, it DOESN'T have NSPortMessage. GAAARGH. So I took the time to replace the NSMapTable stuff with NSValue-wrapped objects inside of an NSMutableDictionary, and replaced the handlePortMessage method implementation with a handleMachMessage method, which took some doing because I had to figure out the structure of a Mach message, NO thanks to ANY of the available documentation...)
Once I started using it, though, I quickly discovered that this implementation wasn't up to snuff. My "actor" class and my main thread will be passing a ton of messages to each other constantly whenever there is network activity, and with InterThreadMessaging, I found that whenever activity started to ramp up, it would collapse on itself. This mostly took the form of deadlocks. I found a note that someone else wrote after experiencing something similar with this library (quoted from DustinVoss @ http://www.cocoadev.com/index.pl?InterThreadMessaging):
"It is possible to deadlock this library if thread A posts a notification on thread B, and the notification on B causes a selector or notification to be posted on thread A. Possibly under other circumstances. I have resolved this in my own code by creating an inter-thread communication lock. When a thread wants to communicate, it tries the lock to see if another thread is already using the InterThreadMessaging library, and if it can't get the lock, it posts a message to its own run-loop to try again later. This is not a good solution, but it seems to work well enough."
So I tried implementing what he described using a global NSLock, and it did help with some of the deadlocks. But not all. I believe the culprit here is the Mach ports system itself (from the NSPortMessage documentation for -sendBeforeDate:):
"If the message cannot be sent immediately, the sending thread blocks until either the message is sent or aDate is reached. Sent messages are queued to minimize blocking, but failure can occur if multiple messages are sent to a port faster than the portís owner can receive them, causing the queue to fill up."
InterThreadMessaging in fact calls -sendBeforeDate: and exposes the deadline option, so I tried setting a really short time-to-live on the Mach messages and then intercepted any NSPortTimeoutExceptions that were thrown; upon catching said exceptions, I would then re-queue up the message to be sent again. It worked, but Performance. Was. A. Dog. At least the message queue wouldn't be full indefinitely anymore, causing the main thread to block, but during the whole time that these messages were expiring because the queue was full and then being re-queued, either the main thread was trying to send more messages or the actor thread was trying to send more messages. And as far as I can tell, the Mach ports queue is global (at the very least, there is seemingly only one per process). The message would get through with this model...eventually.
JUST IN CASE the problem happened to be something I screwed up as I was rewriting portions of the InterThreadMessaging library so that it would compile and work on the iPhone SDK, I substituted in the original version of the library in my Mac test app to see if any of these problems became non-issues. I found that both versions of the library -- mine and the original -- performed identically. So that wasn't it.
Finally, in frustration I said, "screw it, I'm going to try it the Leopard way," and replaced all of the method calls I was making to InterThreadMessaging's -performSelector:withObject:inThread: with calls to Foundation's native -performSelector:onThread:withObject: instead, changing nothing else within my code in the process. And wouldn't you know: IT WORKED GREAT. Performance was (and is) fantastic, about on-par with the non-threaded version when only dealing with a single connection/instance of my class.
So, in the end, I was able to do nothing to salvage the InterThreadMessaging implementation of cross-thread method calling, and as far as I can tell, I'm out of (good) options. And thus my mind is filled with questions:
How is the Leopard -performSelector:onThread: method implemented? I'm guessing not using Mach ports, given that I didn't have the same blocking & deadlocking problems I had with InterThreadMessaging. Is it possible to re-implement this Leopard+ method in a similar manner as a category to NSObject under Tiger? Or is it possible, perhaps, to increase the size of the Mach ports queue so that InterThreadMessaging works at a sane level of performance? Or -- I'm getting desperate here -- is there any way that I could trick -performSelectorOnMainThread: to target a different thread instead? (I am assuming here that -performSelectorOnMainThread is implemented under-the-hood much like the new -performSelector:onThread: is implemented, but with a hard-coded NSThread pointer built-in to the code, and that the new method just exposes a more flexible interface to what is basically the same code. I'm probably wrong...) Is there another third-party library out there that I've missed that fits my requirements for being able to do message-passing between threads in an efficient and portable manner?
I refuse to believe that there is no way for me to maintain compatibility with all of the platforms I wish to support without having to resort to making preprocessor #ifdef spaghetti out of my code. And there SURELY has to be a better way of doing cross-thread message passing in Tiger without using Distributed Objects, for Pete's sake! Is this really how people did it for years-on-end since the dawn of NeXT up until the advent of Leopard? And if there really, genuinely wasn't another alternative, then what is up with the lack of DO in iPhoneOS?? Does Apple seriously intend for developers who have good, solid, tested and working code to just chuck it all and start over? What if there was some aspect of DO that previous implementations relied upon that cannot be recreated with simple -performSelector:onThread: calls? (I don't know what those aspects would be...just a hypothetical.) I mean, I can understand needing to write new stuff from scratch for your UI given how radically different the interface is between the Mac and iPhone, but having to reimplement back-end guts such as something as elemental as threads...really?!
I do laud the inclusion of the new method in Leopard as well as the new ability to subclass NSThread itself. But for those of us that need to support Tiger for one reason or another, some of these restrictions and omissions within iPhoneOS seem like rather pointless (and frustrating) roadblocks.
As I hope is obvious here, I have tried to do my homework before throwing up my hands and pestering y'all. If you have the patience to deal with me, please tell me what I am missing.
Thanks for taking the time to read,
-- NathanThanks again for your patience. Comments below.
etresoft wrote:
It is pretty unusual that anyone would want to call perfomrSelector on any thread other than the main thread.
What I described in my original post was not a worker thread, but an "actor."
It is hard for me to answer this question because there are so many options available to do "message passing". The fact that you think there are so few tells me that you really aren't sure what you need to use.
I didn't say there were few options for message passing. I said there were few options for message passing that fit my criteria, which are that any potential solutions should both A) work efficiently and with good performance, and B) be available both pre-Leopard AND on the iPhone. -performSelector: ain't available before Leopard. Distributed Objects is overkill. Kernel Mach messages apparently have a high overhead, too, as my experience with the third-party library I wrote about in my original message shows.
...consider notifications.
I thought notifications couldn't be posted across threads, either. How do I post a notification to another thread's default notification center or notification queue from a different thread?
The notification center is owned by the process. Each run loop can listen for just the notifications it wants. You don't "pass" or "send" notifications, you run then up the flagpole for all to see.
I am aware of how to use notifications. The documentation for NSNotificationCenter clearly states that "In a multithreaded application, notifications are always delivered in the thread in which the notification was posted, which may not be the same thread in which an observer registered itself."
So, again, I don't see how one thread can post a notification in such a way that the observer's registered method is executed in another thread (posting notifications "across threads"). This probably isn't a big deal if you are using mutexes (assuming you don't actually care which thread carries out the task associated with the notification posting), but as I said before, this is not what I'm after.
I don't know what you are really after.
Allow me to attempt to explain a second time, in a more concise fashion.
My app will have multiple, persistent TCP connections open, one connection per remote device. The user will be able to select a task to execute on a particular device that we have a connection open to, and get back from the application real-time updates as to the progress or results of the execution of that task. In certain cases, the length of the task is infinite; it will keep executing forever and sending back results to my application which will update its display of the results every second that ticks by until the user STOPS that particular task.
This can be done simply using async I/O in the main runloop, sure. But if I were going to thread this so that I could be processing the results I've received back from one *or more* remote devices while also doing something else, given that I will only have one (persistent) connection open to any given remote device that I'm interacting with (that is to say, I won't be opening up a separate TCP session for every single task I want to execute on a single device simultaneously), it makes sense _to me_ to implement this as I've described: with every connection to each remote device getting its own thread that lasts for the lifetime of the TCP session (which could be the entire time the application is running, times however many devices the user wishes to be connected to while in the app). I won't be spawning a new thread for every task the user wishes to ask a remote device to do.
This is why (I think) I need bi-directional messaging between the main thread and each of these threads dedicated to a given remote device that we have an active session with/connection to. The main thread needs to be able to tell remote device X (which already has a running thread dedicated to it) to do task A, and then get real-time feedback from that remote device so that the main thread can be displaying it to the user as it is coming back. Same with remote device Y running task B, simultaneously. At any time during the execution of these tasks, the user needs to be able to tell my app to stop one of these tasks, and the main thread needs to send that message to one of the remote devices via that device's dedicated thread.
This is why I am talking about this in terms of the "actor model," and not the "worker thread model," because the former model seems to fit what I want to do.
-- Nathan -
Revision: 20936
Revision: 20936
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2011-03-21 13:40:50 -0700 (Mon, 21 Mar 2011)
Log Message:
Pass in the MessageBroker class loader to the FactorySettings::createFactory() function.
The supports situations where the MessageBroker class loader is not the same as the one that loaded ClassUtils (e.g. OSGi).
Modified Paths:
blazeds/trunk/modules/core/src/flex/messaging/config/FactorySettings.java
blazeds/trunk/modules/core/src/flex/messaging/config/MessagingConfiguration.javaSpryAccordion.css
You have an error that is killing the rest of your code shown below in red. Remove it.
.AccordionPanelContent {
margin: 0px;
padding: 2px; /**suggest using 12px or more**/
background-image: url(../infobkgd.png);
background-attachment: fixed;
background-repeat: repeat;
font-family: Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif;
font-size: 12px; /**suggest using 16px or more**/
color: #FFF;
overflow: hidden;
height: 40
[x;
height: 100%;
Nancy O. -
Processing Multiple files in the reciever channel
Hi Experts,
We have a scenario where PI is supposed to pick a zip file containing different files, Post which PI should unzip the files and send it to receiving system.
We have used payload zip bean to unzip the files in the sender channel and it was successful. The problem here is the receiver channel.
Receiver channel is not able to process all the files. The file name and extension is causing the problem as we have different file names and extensions.
I tried using the Payload zip bean in the reciever channel too but again the file name and extension were the issue. Attached the screenshot of the message processed in the communication channel which clearly shows the kind of files we are expecting. we are using PI 7.4 single stack.
Batch script is something we are not really looking at... Can you please provide some solution?unable to attach the screenshot sorry
-
Error message when trying to install iTunes on my Pc:
Using Windows 7, had to replace hard drive. HELP!!
This installation package could not be
opened. Verify that the package exists
and that you can access it, or contact
the application vendor to verify that
this is a valid Windows installer packageHello JAH1961,
I recommend following the steps in the article below when getting an error message trying to install iTunes:
Trouble installing iTunes or QuickTime for Windows
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1926
Thank you for using Apple Support Communities.
Best,
Sheila M. -
When I am writing an email, I get an alert message that says “The message could not be copied or moved to the drafts folder. Writing to the folder failed. To gain disc space, choose Empty Deleted and choose Compact Folders and try again.”
If I do that, I get a message saying “There was an error copying to the Sent folder,, retry?”
If I retry it sends the uncompleted email. All I can do is keep deleting the message and carry on. Then the whole business might repeat itself.
Help!
FrankBecause the location for each song in your library is on your hard drive. If the hard drive isn't there, how can iTunes play it?
You'll have to move/copy the music from your hard drive to your computer's hard drive.
Basically, EASIEST way to do all this, if you don't care about your play counts, etc...
-Delete EVERYTHING from iTunes, so that your library is now empty.
-Go to "Advanced" inside of the "Preferences" window, found in the "Edit" drop-down. You can also access Preferences by pressing Ctrl+, (Press Ctrl and the comma key)
-Change your iTunes Media Folder Location to something simple, but on your computer. I use C:/iTunes. Make sure "Keep iTunes Media Folder Organized" and "Copy files to...." are both checked. You can close Preferences now.
-Now, drag and drop your music from your hard drive into your iTunes library. iTunes will automatically add the music to your library, as you would expect, and also creates a copy of each file to place into that iTunes Media Folder you just created.
Shouldn't have any more problems... -
I'm running snow leopard. The try to open any .mov file in Quicktime, and I get an error message that says, "The document xyz.mov could not be opened. The movie is not in a format that Quicktime player understands. I'm a recent upgrade to Snow Leopard.
Help!
Thanks, MarkUnfortunately, the error message gives no details about what codec might be missing or what it needs.
If the file can't be opened in QT, it only means you cannot use the QT "Inspector" window to check what compression formats were used to create the file. It does not mean you can't use the Finder "Information" window to check on the compression formats or use a third party media information window (e.g., like VLC which will open many compression formats not supported natively by QT) to determine what kind of data is included in the MOV wrapper. If the file cannot be opened in any app, it is usually a good sign that the file itself is corrupted.
It's a stupid error message. Apple should do better than that.
Error trapping is quite extensive but there are still many areas which require human oversight. The message is telling you that either the container has a problem (e.g., not properly terminated, non-standard, or corrupted) or that one or more of the compression formats used is not supported by your current codec component configuration or that the data was encoded using non-standard settings or preferences not supported by QT or that the fourCC code does not match the data contained in the file or that there are timecode inconsistencies, etc., etc., etc. In short there are a near infinite number of possible problems for which it would be very difficult/nearly impossible to program error trapping depending on your sourcing of content and how you process it before it reaches the player app. Think of it like trying to play a BD disc in an DVD player.
I'll call Apple support when I get a chance.
Chances are good that they will end up sending you back here. In any case, it is often a good idea to post a sample file for examination by other QT users. At the very least, they should be able to tell you if the sample file will play on other systems which would indicate whether or not the file itself is bad and under the best of circumstances whould allow them to examing the file in detail for various common problems. -
whem installing itunes on my mums new computer which is windows 7 i get this message everytime "this installation package could not be opened. Verifiy that the package exists and that you can access it, or contact the application vendor to verify that this is a valid windows installer package"
Let's check your Windows system.
1. Have you done all the important windows updates and service Packs on your system. If not do it now. START button, type in Windows Update and ENTER. Select 'CHECK FOR UPDATES'
2. Let's check your Windows system files for possible file corruption
SCAN and repair possible Windows system file corruption:
Go to command prompt (START/ALL PROGRAMS/ACCESSORIES right mouse click "command prompt" and choose "Run as Administrator"
type in
sfc /scannow
let Windows fix any system files that need to be repaired.
Restart the computer if it did actually repair any files.
3. Check your system for possible Malware. But you have to do it in WIndows Safe Mode.
Start your computer in "Safe mode with networking", go to this link download a free version of Malwarebyte.
http://www.malwarebytes.org/products/malwarebytes_free
Install and perform update immediately, then do a full SCAN. Remove malware if it indeed finds any. Restart computer to regular windows to let Malwarebyte complete the removal.
To start your computer in safe mode
Press and hold the F8 key as your computer starts. You need to press F8 before the Windows logo appears. If the Windows logo appears, you'll need to try again by waiting until the Windows logon prompt appears, and then shutting down and restarting your computer.
On the Advanced Boot Options screen, use the arrow keys to highlight the "safe mode with networking" option, and then press Enter. Log on to your computer with a user account that has administrator rights.
When your computer is in safe mode, you'll see the words Safe Mode in the corners of your screen. To exit safe mode, restart your computer and let Windows start normally. -
Please help
I am trying to download itunes on windows 7 32 bit, everytime I go to open download it comes up with a green screen then a error message.
This installation package could not be opened. Verify that the package exist.
Please help MeHi gump68,
Thanks for visiting Apple Support Communities.
You may find the steps in this article helpful if iTunes is not installing on your PC:
Issues installing iTunes or QuickTime for Windows
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1926
All the best,
Jeremy -
I recently reset my computer and copy my music from an external hard drive to my itunes library. When I click on a song to play i get an error message that says " the song could not be used because the original file could not be found". But when I have my external hard drive plug in the song will play with no problem. What do I need to do to play my music without having the external harddrive plug in ???????? Please help
Because the location for each song in your library is on your hard drive. If the hard drive isn't there, how can iTunes play it?
You'll have to move/copy the music from your hard drive to your computer's hard drive.
Basically, EASIEST way to do all this, if you don't care about your play counts, etc...
-Delete EVERYTHING from iTunes, so that your library is now empty.
-Go to "Advanced" inside of the "Preferences" window, found in the "Edit" drop-down. You can also access Preferences by pressing Ctrl+, (Press Ctrl and the comma key)
-Change your iTunes Media Folder Location to something simple, but on your computer. I use C:/iTunes. Make sure "Keep iTunes Media Folder Organized" and "Copy files to...." are both checked. You can close Preferences now.
-Now, drag and drop your music from your hard drive into your iTunes library. iTunes will automatically add the music to your library, as you would expect, and also creates a copy of each file to place into that iTunes Media Folder you just created.
Shouldn't have any more problems... -
The full message was "The installation package could not be opened. Verify that the package exists and that you can access it, or contact the application vendor to verify this is a valid Windows Installer package."
OK, I got around this error by extracting the files to "C:\Program Files (x86)\Adobe Acrobat XI"
Now I get a different error "1325.kstanwood is not a valid short file name". I'm not certain why it's even trying to create such a file name. -
Each time I try to install itunes I get a windows installer message telling me that the installation package could not be opened. Verify that the package exists and that you can access it, or contact the application vendor to verify that this is a valid windows installer package.....
I'd first try downloading an installer from the Apple website using a different web browser:
http://www.apple.com/itunes/download/
If you use Firefox instead of IE for the download (or vice versa), do you get a working installer?
Maybe you are looking for
-
Performance tuning of forms deployed on web
This is regarding forms deployed on the Web. When a form is deployed on the web, every call form results in downloading of the all the images required for the toolbar. Analyzing the OAS log files shows that more than 90% of the http requests from cli
-
I am trying to sync my iphone 4s to my windowns Itunes account. When i try to do it, the sync wants to remove all of the content on my phone and replace it with what is on my laptop, which has nothing yet. I am trying to move all of my purchased an
-
When the reconciliation analysis report is generated, there is a difference (in negative). Please provide me an explanation as to the cause of the difference and the possible solutions from FI and FM reconciliation tool perspective. Thanks.
-
Database Session hangs around for 20 minutes after logout
We used HTML DB 1.6.0.00.87 to create a custom data warehouse reporting application. For some reason once you log out of HMTL_DB, the database session does not go away until 20 minutes later. I have tested it several times and it is consistent at 20
-
RBBP_OFFLINE_EVAL No e-mails exist for execution of work items
Hi , We are trying to implement SRM offline approval. The system is able to send the email to the approvers, but when they click on approve, the work item does not get updated. When i try to run report RBBP_OFFLINE_EVAL it says that No e-mails exist