Count(*) in select statement having group by clause

Hi
I would like to use count(*) in select statement having group by clause. say for example there is a state with a number of cities listed. I would like to get the count of cities for each state.
the sql stement is grouped by city and it is joined with 5 more tables.
Thanks

I suspect you want to look into analytic functions (assuming you have a recent version of Oracle). asktom.oracle.com has numerous examples if you do a search.
Justin

Similar Messages

Count(*) function in select statement having group by condition

Hi
I would like to use count(*) in select statement having group by clause. say for example there is a state with a number of cities listed. I would like to get the count of cities for each state.
the sql stement is grouped by state and it is joined with 5 more tables.
Thanks
ps: ignore the previous post

Assuming there is one record per city per state, then
SELECT state,count(*)
FROM state_tbl
GROUP BY stateWill get one record per state with the number of cities in each state. If you want to join that result set to other tables you need to either create a view with that statement or use an in-line view viz.
SELECT c.cust_name,c.state,s.num_cities
FROM customers c,
     (SELECT state,count(*) num_cities
      FROM state_tbl
      GROUP BY state) s
WHERE c.state = s.stateTTFN
John

Select statement having internal table in the wher clause...

Hi,
will all the entry from the internal i_crhd will be pased to the next select statement in the sample code below without looping? Thanks a lot!
REFRESH i_crhd.
   SELECT objid vgwts
     FROM crhd INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE i_crhd
     WHERE arbpl IN s_arbpl.
pulling the cost centre linked to the resource
   IF sy-subrc EQ 0 AND i_crhd[] IS NOT INITIAL.
     REFRESH i_crco.
     SELECT kostl FROM crco
       INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE i_crco
       FOR ALL ENTRIES IN i_crhd
       WHERE objid = i_crhd-objid.
     IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
      do nothing.
     ENDIF.
   ENDIF.

Hi,
The code looks fine..u can very well go ahead with the code...
Wht all other ABAPers said about FOR ALL ENTRIES is absolutely rite.
But i have a small suggestion...
Why cant u use a INNNER JOIN for those 2 queries...
like...
SELECT cr~objid
             cr~vgwts
             co~kostl
FROM crhd AS cr INNER JOIN
          crco AS co
ON crobjid = coobjid
INTO TABLE i_crco
WHERE cr~arbpl IN s_arbpl.
Now in i_crco 3 fields will be thr
objid, vgwts, kostl.....this one can change as u wish...
Why i suggest not to ue FOR ALL ENTRIES is sometimes it is a performanc killer....in this code i feel this will do fine...
Please let me know if u feel not ok with this code...
Reward if found useful...
Regards,
ABAPer 007.

SQL insert with select statement having strange results

So I have the below sql (edited a bit). Now here's the problem.
I can run the select statement just fine, i get 48 rows back. When I run with the insert statement, a total of 9062 rows are inserted. What gives?
<SQL>
INSERT INTO mars_aes_data
(rpt_id, shpdt, blno, stt, shpr_nad, branch_tableS, csgn_nad,
csgnnm1, foreign_code, pnt_des, des, eccn_no, entity_no,
odtc_cert_ind, dep_date, equipment_no, haz_flag, schd_no,
schd_desc, rec_value, iso_ulti_dest, odtc_exempt, itn,
liscence_no, liscence_flag, liscence_code, mblno, mot,
cntry_load, pnt_load, origin_state, airline_prefix, qty1, qty2,
ref_val, related, routed_flag, scac, odtc_indicator, seal_no,
line_no, port_export, port_unlading, shipnum, shprnm1, veh_title,
total_value, odtc_cat_code, unit1, unit2)
SELECT 49, schemaP.tableS.shpdt, schemaP.tableS.blno,
schemaP.tableS.stt, schemaP.tableS.shpr_nad,
schemaP.tableM.branch_tableS, schemaP.tableS.csgn_nad,
schemaP.tableS.csgnnm1, schemaP.tableD.foreign_code,
schemaP.tableS.pnt_des, schemaP.tableS.des,
schemaP.tableD.eccn_no, schemaP.tableN.entity_no,
schemaP.tableD.odtc_cert_ind, schemaP.tableM.dep_date,
schemaP.tableM.equipment_no, schemaP.tableM.haz_flag,
schemaP.tableD.schd_no, schemaP.tableD.schd_desc,
schemaP.tableD.rec_value,
schemaP.tableM.iso_ulti_dest,
schemaP.tableD.odtc_exempt, schemaP.tableM.itn,
schemaP.tableD.liscence_no,
schemaP.tableM.liscence_flag,
schemaP.tableD.liscence_code, schemaP.tableS.mblno,
schemaP.tableM.mot, schemaP.tableS.cntry_load,
schemaP.tableS.pnt_load, schemaP.tableM.origin_state,
schemaP.tableM.airline_prefix, schemaP.tableD.qty1,
schemaP.tableD.qty2,
schemaC.func_getRefs@link (schemaP.tableS.ptt, 'ZYX'),
schemaP.tableM.related, schemaP.tableM.routed_flag,
schemaP.tableM.scac, schemaP.tableD.odtc_indicator,
schemaP.tableM.seal_no, schemaP.tableD.line_no,
schemaP.tableM.port_export,
schemaP.tableM.port_unlading, schemaP.tableS.shipnum,
schemaP.tableS.shprnm1, schemaP.tableV.veh_title,
schemaP.tableM.total_value,
schemaP.tableD.odtc_cat_code, schemaP.tableD.unit1,
schemaP.tableD.unit2
FROM schemaP.tableD@link,
schemaP.tableM@link,
schemaP.tableN@link,
schemaP.tableS@link,
schemaP.tableV@link
WHERE tableM.answer IN ('123', '456')
AND SUBSTR (tableS.area, 1, 1) IN ('A', 'S')
AND entity_no IN
('A',
'B',
'C',
'D',
'E',
AND TO_DATE (SUBSTR (tableM.time_stamp, 1, 8), 'YYYYMMDD')
BETWEEN '01-Mar-2009'
AND '31-Mar-2009'
AND tableN.shipment= tableD.shipment(+)
AND tableN.shipment= tableS.shipnum
AND tableN.shipment= tableM.shipment(+)
AND tableN.shipment= tableV.shipment(+)
<SQL>
Edited by: user11263048 on Jun 12, 2009 7:23 AM
Edited by: user11263048 on Jun 12, 2009 7:27 AM

Can you change this:
BETWEEN '01-Mar-2009'
AND '31-Mar-2009'To this:
BETWEEN TO_DATE('01-Mar-2009', 'DD-MON-YYYY')
AND TO_DATE('31-Mar-2009','DD-MON-YYYY')That may make no difference but you should never rely on implicit conversions like that, they're always likely to cause you nasty surprises.
If you're still getting the discrepancy, instead of and INSERT-SELECT, can you try a CREATE TABLE AS SELECT... just to see if you get the same result.

Case statement with group by clause

SELECT STP, CASE WHEN Alternate IS NULL THEN 3 ELSE 4 END as Ind,
CASE WHEN Alternate IS NULL THEN 'New Address' ELSE 'New Location' END as Description , Count(*) Rec_Cnt
FROM t_Ids
group by STP, CASE WHEN Alternate IS NULL THEN 3 ELSE 4 END, CASE WHEN Alternate IS NULL THEN 'New Address' ELSE 'New Location'
ORDER BY 1,2,3
I need a query something like this. Does anyone has any idea on this???

You're missing the END on the GROUP BY Case statement, but otherwise this looks fine.
What problem are you having?
Also, please post DDL
Thanks
Carl

Output count of SELECT statement is diff from count(*) of the same query

Has this ever happened to you?
I was wondering why some of the items were not appearing in my output. I have this select query:
    SELECT
        bukrs
        gjahr
        hkont
        belnr
        wrbtr
        dmbtr
        matnr
        bschl
        kunnr
        vbeln
        shkzg
    FROM bseg
    INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE i_output
    FOR ALL ENTRIES IN i_bkpf
    WHERE
        bukrs EQ i_bkpf-bukrs
        AND belnr EQ i_bkpf-belnr
        AND gjahr EQ i_bkpf-gjahr
        AND hkont IN hkont
        AND hkont IN
            ('0004000000',
            '0004000010',
            '0004000020',
            '0004000030',
            '0004000040')
When I tried to put sample filters (bukrs: 1000; belnr 1800000016; gjahr: 2005; hkont: 4000000), I am getting 3 entries from bseg. But when I tried using SE16 or SE16N, I am getting 6 (which is the expected output). When I modify the same SELECT query to return just the output count, I AM getting 6.
    SELECT count(*)
    FROM bseg
    INTO count
    FOR ALL ENTRIES IN i_bkpf
    WHERE
        bukrs EQ i_bkpf-bukrs
        AND belnr EQ i_bkpf-belnr
        AND gjahr EQ i_bkpf-gjahr
        AND hkont IN hkont
        AND hkont IN
            ('0004000000',
            '0004000010',
            '0004000020',
            '0004000030',
            '0004000040')
Do you have any idea why this happens? My internal table is a standard table with no header line and no OCCURS statement.
Kyle

Hello Kyle,
Thats because when using FOR ALL ENTRIES, it will delete the duplicates if the records selected dont have all the primary keys specified in the select query. In your first select query, the field BUZEI is missing which makes the records unique. Change your first select query as this and try
SELECT
        bukrs
        gjahr
        hkont
        belnr
        buzei   -------> Add this and check
        wrbtr
        dmbtr
        matnr
        bschl
        kunnr
        vbeln
        shkzg
    FROM bseg
    INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE i_output
    FOR ALL ENTRIES IN i_bkpf
    WHERE
        bukrs EQ i_bkpf-bukrs
        AND belnr EQ i_bkpf-belnr
        AND gjahr EQ i_bkpf-gjahr
        AND hkont IN hkont
        AND hkont IN
            ('0004000000',
            '0004000010',
            '0004000020',
            '0004000030',
            '0004000040')
Vikranth

Query related to excution and performance of count in select statement

Hi,
What are the difference between
select count(1) from table
and
select count(*) from table

Thanks for the reply.I searched lots of thread for the same and found that it's same (excution wise and performance wise).
But in few thread i found that someone is saying
"At the time of exceution Count(1) will conevrted internally to count(*) " --- is it correct
"is there any soecial significance of using count(42)" ?
Tx,
Anit

Group by clause and having clause in select

hi frnds
plz give me some information of group by and having clause used in select statement with example
thanks

The Open SQL statement for reading data from database tables is:
SELECT <result>
INTO <target>
FROM <source>
[WHERE <condition>]
[GROUP BY <fields>]
[HAVING <cond>]
[ORDER BY <fields>].
The SELECT statement is divided into a series of simple clauses, each of which has a different part to play in selecting, placing, and arranging the data from the database.
You can only use the HAVING clause in conjunction with the GROUP BY clause.
To select line groups, use:
SELECT <lines> <s1> [AS <a1>] <s2> [AS <a2>] ...
 <agg> <sm> [AS <am>] <agg> <sn> [AS <an>] ...
 GROUP BY <s1> <s2> ....
 HAVING <cond>.
The conditions <cond> that you can use in the HAVING clause are the same as those in the SELECT clause, with the restrictions that you can only use columns from the SELECT clause, and not all of the columns from the database tables in the FROM clause. If you use an invalid column, a runtime error results.
On the other hand, you can enter aggregate expressions for all columns read from the database table that do not appear in the GROUP BY clause. This means that you can use aggregate expressions, even if they do not appear in the SELECT clause. You cannot use aggregate expressions in the conditions in the WHERE clause.
As in the WHERE clause, you can specify the conditions in the HAVING clause as the contents of an internal table with line type C and length 72.
Example
DATA WA TYPE SFLIGHT.
SELECT CONNID
INTO WA-CONNID
FROM SFLIGHT
WHERE CARRID = 'LH'
GROUP BY CONNID
HAVING SUM( SEATSOCC ) > 300.
WRITE: / WA-CARRID, WA-CONNID.
ENDSELECT.
This example selects groups of lines from database table SFLIGHT with the value LH for CARRID and identical values of CONNID. The groups are then restricted further by the condition that the sum of the contents of the column SEATSOCC for a group must be greater than 300.
The GROUP BY clause summarizes several lines from the database table into a single line of the selection.
The GROUP BY clause allows you to summarize lines that have the same content in particular columns. Aggregate functions are applied to the other columns. You can specify the columns in the GROUP BY clause either statically or dynamically.
Specifying Columns Statically
To specify the columns in the GROUP BY clause statically, use:
SELECT <lines> <s1> [AS <a 1>] <s 2> [AS <a 2>] ...
 <agg> <sm> [AS <a m>] <agg> <s n> [AS <a n>] ...
 GROUP BY <s1> <s 2> ....
To use the GROUP BY clause, you must specify all of the relevant columns in the SELECT clause. In the GROUP BY clause, you list the field names of the columns whose contents must be the same. You can only use the field names as they appear in the database table. Alias names from the SELECT clause are not allowed.
All columns of the SELECT clause that are not listed in the GROUP BY clause must be included in aggregate functions. This defines how the contents of these columns is calculated when the lines are summarized.
Specifying Columns Dynamically
To specify the columns in the GROUP BY clause dynamically, use:
... GROUP BY (<itab>) ...
where <itab> is an internal table with line type C and maximum length 72 characters containing the column names <s 1 > <s 2 > .....
Example
DATA: CARRID TYPE SFLIGHT-CARRID,
 MINIMUM TYPE P DECIMALS 2,
 MAXIMUM TYPE P DECIMALS 2.
SELECT CARRID MIN( PRICE ) MAX( PRICE )
INTO (CARRID, MINIMUM, MAXIMUM)
FROM SFLIGHT
GROUP BY CARRID.
WRITE: / CARRID, MINIMUM, MAXIMUM.
ENDSELECT.
regards
vinod

Strange results with Insert statement having select query

Hi all,
I am facing a strange issue with Insert statement based on a select query having multiple joins.
DB- Oracle 10g
Following is the layout of my query -
Insert into Table X
Select distinct Col1, Col2, Col3, Col4, Function(Col 5) from Table A, B
where trunc(updated_date) > = trunc(sysdate-3)
and join conditions for A, B
Union
Select Col1, Col2, Col3, Col4, Function(Col 5) from Table C, D
trunc(updated_date) > = trunc(sysdate-3)
and join conditions for C, D
Union
.... till 4 unions. all tables are residing in the local Database and not having records more than 50,000.
If I execute above insert in a DBMS job, it results into suppose 50 records where as if I execute the select query it gives 56 records.
We observed following things-
a) no issue with size of tablespace
b) no error while inserting
c) since query takes lot of time so we have not used Cursor and PLSQL block for inserting.
d) this discrepancy in number of records happens frequently but not everytime.
e) examined the records left out from the insert, there we couldn't find any specific pattern.
f) there is no constraint on the table X in which we are trying to insert. Also tables A, B, C....
I went through this thread -SQL insert with select statement having strange results but mainly users are having either DB Links or comparison of literal dates, in my case there is none.
Can somebody explain why is the discrepancy and what is the solution for it.
Or atleast some pointers how to proceed with the analysis.
Edited by: Pramod Verma on Mar 5, 2013 4:59 AM
Updated query and added more details

>
Since I am using Trunc() in the where clause so timing should not matter much. Also I manually ruled out records which were updated after the job run.
>
The first rule of troubleshooting is to not let your personal opinion get in the way of finding out what is wrong.
Actually this code, and the process it represents, is the most likely CAUSE of the problem.
>
where trunc(updated_date) > = trunc(sysdate-3)
>
You CANNOT reliably use columns like UPDATED_DATE to select records for processing. Your process is flawed.
The value of that column is NOT the date/time that the data was actually committed; it is the date/time that the row was populated.
If you insert a row into a table right now, using SYSDATE (8am on 3/5/2013) and don't commit that row until April your process will NEVER see that 3/5/2013 date until April.
Here is the more typical scenario that I see all the time.
1. Data is inserted/updated all day long on 3/4/2013.
2. A column, for example UPDATED_DATE is given a value of SYSDATE (3/4/2013) in a query or by a trigger on the table.
3. The insert/update query takes place at 11:55 PM - so the SYSDATE values are for THE DAY THE QUERY BEGAN
4. The data pull begins at 12:05 am (on 3/5/2013 - just after midnight)
5. The transaction is COMMITTED at 12:10 AM (on 3/5/2013); 5 minutes after the data pull began.
That data extract in step 4 will NEVER see those records! They DO NOT EXIST when the data pull query is executed since they haven't been committed.
Even worse, the next nights data pull will not see them either! That is because the next pull will pull data for 3/5/2013 but those records have a date of 3/4/2013. They will never get processed.
>
Job timing is 4am and 10pm EST
>
Another wrinkle is when data is inserted/updated from different timezones and the UPDATED_DATE value is from the CLIENT pc or server. Then you can get even more data missed since the client dates may be hours different than the server date used for the data pull process.
DO NOT try to use UPDATED_DATE type columns to do delta extraction or you can have this issue.

SELECT statement in FROM clause - syntax help

Hi,
I want to have a SELECT statement in the FROM clause. I get syntax error when doing this and since I am new to ABAP I need som help.
I want to do the following, (and if anyone has any SELECT statement from their own system which you know there is no syntax error in please post it here so I can analyze the syntax):
*I leave the INTO itab clause out, since I only want to demonstrate the functionality
I am trying to get.
SELECT tableOne~someField
FROM tab AS tableOne (SELECT someField
 FROM tab
 WHERE someFiled > 1) AS tableTwo
WHERE tableOnesomeField > tableTwosomeField
like I said, the problem is that the select statement in the parenthesis in the from clause seems to be incorrect because I get "wrong expression" when trying to compile. Is this because I cannot have a select statement in the from clause or is it because of a minor syntax error, such as I forgot a dot, or some other sign?
thanks and regards
Baran

sorry i am not enough familiar with sub queries but some error i can see which i will state here.
1> you have to use sub queries i.e. select in ( ) after where clause because here you are fulfilling a where clause by another select statement.
like this
SELECT * FROM SFLIGHT
 INTO WA
 WHERE SEATSOCC = ( SELECT MAX( SEATSOCC ) FROM SFLIGHT ).
2> you cannot specify field name without into clause either you have to use
select * or select f1 into tab-f1 like this...
but if you are using select * without into you have to define
tables : dbtab.
selec * from dbtab. like that.
regards
shiba dutta

Benchmarks on select statements

Hi,
I'm during preparing test on select statement to check what clause cause the most slow down. Therefore I prepare 3 select statement:
1) select which transform all columns in source table for oracle's functions like: substr, rpad, decode, nvl,upper, mod, greatest, length, power, instr etc..
2) select with big where clause (about 7 lines) which take from 2 tables
3) select which have where, group by, having and order by clauses
Perhaps I will have first result today. But I am very interested what is your experience in this subject?? Which case cause the biggest slow down?
Best.

Hi Tut,
what is your experience in this subject?? Every database is different, but in general:
1) select which transform all columns in source table for oracle's functions like: substr, rpad, decode, nvl,upper, mod, greatest, length, power, instr etc..Very low overhead.
2) select with big where clause (about 7 lines) which take from 2 tablesLong time to parse, and sometime Oracle does not get the cardinality right and joins the tables in the wrong order. To fix this issue:
1 - apply histograms. I have my notes here: http://www.dba-oracle.com/art_otn_cbo_p4.htm
2 - Use an ORDERED hint to enforce the best table join order: I have my notes here: http://www.dba-oracle.com/t_table_join_order.htm
3) select which have where, group by, having and order by clausesJust make sure that you have a large enough PGA to void sorts to disk (sort_area_size, pga_aggregate_target)
Hope this answers your questions . . .
Donald K. Burleson
Oracle Press author
Author of "Oracle Tuning: The Definitive Reference":
http://www.dba-oracle.com/bp/s_oracle_tuning_book.htm

ABAP Select statement performance (with nested NOT IN selects)

Hi Folks,
I'm working on the ST module and am working with the document flow table VBFA. The query takes a large amount of time, and is timing out in production. I am hoping that someone would be able to give me a few tips to make this run faster. In our test environment, this query take 12+ minutes to process.
 SELECT vbfa~vbeln
 vbfa~vbelv
 Sub~vbelv
 Material~matnr
 Material~zzactshpdt
 Material~werks
 Customer~name1
 Customer~sortl
 FROM vbfa JOIN vbrk AS Parent ON ( Parentvbeln = vbfavbeln )
 JOIN vbfa AS Sub ON ( Subvbeln = vbfavbeln )
 JOIN vbap AS Material ON ( Materialvbeln = Subvbelv )
 JOIN vbak AS Header ON ( Headervbeln = Subvbelv )
 JOIN vbpa AS Partner ON ( Partnervbeln = Subvbelv )
 JOIN kna1 AS Customer ON ( Customerkunnr = Partnerkunnr )
 INTO (WA_Transfers-vbeln,
 WA_Transfers-vbelv,
 WA_Transfers-order,
 WA_Transfers-MATNR,
 WA_Transfers-sdate,
 WA_Transfers-sfwerks,
 WA_Transfers-name1,
 WA_Transfers-stwerks)
 WHERE vbfa~vbtyp_n = 'M' "Invoice
 AND vbfa~fktyp = 'L' "Delivery Related Billing Doc
 AND vbfa~vbtyp_v = 'J' "Delivery Doc
 AND vbfa~vbelv IN S_VBELV
 AND Sub~vbtyp_n = 'M' "Invoice Document Type
 AND Sub~vbtyp_v = 'C' "Order Document Type
 AND Partner~parvw = 'WE' "Ship To Party(actual desc. is SH)
 AND Material~zzactshpdt IN S_SDATE
 AND ( Parentfkart = 'ZTRA' OR Parentfkart = 'ZTER' )
 AND vbfa~vbelv NOT IN
 ( SELECT subvbfa~vbelv
 FROM vbfa AS subvbfa
 WHERE subvbfavbelv = vbfavbelv
 AND subvbfa~vbtyp_n = 'V' ) "Purchase Order
 AND vbfa~vbelv NOT IN
 ( SELECT DelList~vbeln
 FROM vbfa AS DelList
 WHERE DelListvbeln = vbfavbelv
 AND DelList~vbtyp_v = 'C' "Order Document Type
 AND DelList~vbelv IN "Delivery Doc
 ( SELECT OrderList~vbelv
 FROM vbfa AS OrderList
 WHERE OrderList~vbtyp_n = 'H' ) "Return Ord
 APPEND WA_Transfers TO ITAB_Transfers.
 ENDSELECT.
Cheers,
Chris

I am sending u some of the performance isuues that are to be kept in mind while coding.
1.Donot use Select *...... instead use Select <required list>......
2.Donot fetch data from CLUSTER tables.
3.Donot use Nested Select statements as. U have used nested select which reduces performance to a greater extent.
Instead use views/join .
Also keep in mind that not use join condition for more for more than three tables unless otherwise required.
So split select statements into three or four and use Select ......for all entries....
4.Extract the data from the database atonce consolidated upfront into table.
i.e. use INTO TABLE <ITAB> clause instead of using
Select----
End Select.
5.Never use order by clause in Select ..... statement. instead use SORT<itab>.
6.When ever u need to calculate max,min,avg,sum,count use AGGREGATE FUNCTIONS and GROUP BY clause insted of calculating by userself..
7.Donot use the same table once for Validation and another time for data extraction.select data only once.
8.When the intention is for validation use Select single ....../Select.......up to one rows ......statements.
9.If possible always use array operations to update the database tables.
10.Order of the fields in the where clause select statement must be in the same order in the index of table.
11.Never release the object unless throughly checked by st05/se30/slin.
12.Avoid using identical select statements.

Select statement without into

Hi ,
I am currently working with a include which is already written. The include has a select statement where the into clause is not available.
SELECT SINGLE * FROM cnvmbtrename
        WHERE packid    = p_pack
          AND domname   = space
          AND param     = gc_rfcdest
          AND value_old = ls_rename1-value_old
          AND value_new = ls_rename1-value_new.
This statement works fine when it is sued in some other program, but i does not work in mine. Can someone help me on this front.
Regards,
Rishav

Hi
U make sure all global data are defined in your program too, so:
- Database table:
TABLES cnvmbtrename.
- Selection screen (I suppose):
PARAMETERS: P_PACK....
- Data:
DATA: gc_rfcdest
Max

Creation of view with clob column in select and group by clause.

Hi,
We are trying to migrate a view from sql server2005 to oracle 10g. It has clob column which is used in group by clause. How can the same be achived in oracle 10g.
Below is the sql statament used in creating view aling with its datatypes.
CREATE OR REPLACE FORCE VIEW "TEST" ("CONTENT_ID", "TITLE", "KEYWORDS", "CONTENT", "ISPOPUP", "CREATED", "SEARCHSTARTDATE", "SEARCHENDDATE", "HITS", "TYPE", "CREATEDBY", "UPDATED", "ISDISPLAYED", "UPDATEDBY", "AVERAGERATING", "VOTES") AS
SELECT content_ec.content_id,
 content_ec.title,
 content_ec.keywords,
 content_ec.content content ,
 content_ec.ispopup,
 content_ec.created,
 content_ec.searchstartdate,
 content_ec.searchenddate,
 COUNT(contenttracker_ec.contenttracker_id) hits,
 contenttypes_ec.type,
 users_ec_1.username createdby,
 Backup_Latest.created updated,
 Backup_Latest.isdisplayed,
 users_ec_1.username updatedby,
 guideratings.averagerating,
 guideratings.votes
 FROM users_ec users_ec_1
 JOIN Backup_Latest
 ON users_ec_1.USER_ID = Backup_Latest.USER_ID
 RIGHT JOIN content_ec
 JOIN contenttypes_ec
 ON content_ec.contenttype_id = contenttypes_ec.contenttype_id
 ON Backup_Latest.content_id = content_ec.content_id
 LEFT JOIN guideratings
 ON content_ec.content_id = guideratings.content_id
 LEFT JOIN contenttracker_ec
 ON content_ec.content_id = contenttracker_ec.content_id
 LEFT JOIN users_ec users_ec_2
 ON content_ec.user_id = users_ec_2.USER_ID
 GROUP BY content_ec.content_id,
 content_ec.title,
 content_ec.keywords,
 to_char(content_ec.content) ,
 content_ec.ispopup,
 content_ec.created,
 content_ec.searchstartdate,
 content_ec.searchenddate,
 contenttypes_ec.type,
 users_ec_1.username,
 Backup_Latest.created,
 Backup_Latest.isdisplayed,
 users_ec_1.username,
 guideratings.averagerating,
 guideratings.votes;
Column Name Data TYpe
CONTENT_ID NUMBER(10,0)
TITLE VARCHAR2(50)
KEYWORDS VARCHAR2(100)
CONTENT CLOB
ISPOPUP NUMBER(1,0)
CREATED TIMESTAMP(6)
SEARCHSTARTDATE TIMESTAMP(6)
SEARCHENDDATE TIMESTAMP(6)
HITS NUMBER
TYPE VARCHAR2(50)
CREATEDBY VARCHAR2(20)
UPDATED TIMESTAMP(6)
ISDISPLAYED NUMBER(1,0)
UPDATEDBY VARCHAR2(20)
AVERAGERATING NUMBER
VOTES NUMBERAny help realyy appreciated.
Thanks in advance
Edited by: user512743 on Dec 10, 2008 10:46 PM

Hello,
Specifically, this should be asked in the
ASP.Net MVC forum on forums.asp.net.
Karl
When you see answers and helpful posts, please click Vote As Helpful, Propose As Answer, and/or Mark As Answer.
My Blog: Unlock PowerShell
My Book: Windows PowerShell 2.0 Bible
My E-mail: -join ('6F6C646B61726C40686F746D61696C2E636F6D'-split'(?<=\G.{2})'|%{if($_){[char][int]"0x$_"}})

SQL select query having more than 1000 values in 'IN' clause of predicate.

Hi,
We are executing a select query from a table and showing it through a front end screen. When the count of values given in the 'IN' clause of predicate are exceeding 1000 , it is throwing error.
eg. select * from Employees where emp.Id. in('111',123','121','3232',........1001 Ids)
We are using Oracle version 10.2.0.
Please suggest how to tackle such issue.
Regards,
Naveen Kumar.C.
Edited by: Naveen Kumar C on Aug 30, 2008 10:01 PM

Use a nested table:
create or replace type numbertype
as object
(nr number(20,10) )
create or replace type number_table
as table of numbertype
create or replace procedure tableselect
( p_numbers in number_table
, p_ref_result out sys_refcursor)
is
begin
open p_ref_result for
     select *
{noformat}     from   employees
     ,        (select /*+ cardinality(tab 10) */ tab.nr
               from   table(p_numbers) tab) tbnrs
     where id = tbnrs.nr;
end;
/{noformat}
Using nested tables will reduce the amount of parsing because the sql statement uses binded variables! The cardinality hint causes Oracle to use the index on employees.id.

Count(*) in select statement having group by clause

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for