Count / sum function in report problem

Hi
In my report i was using this code to output the area code and count the man_suspend records from the Trans_code colum. Like so
SELECT AUN_CODE,
COUNT(*) FROM rr_transaction WHERE trans_code = 'MAN_SUSPEND'
GROUP BY AUN_CODE
AUN_CODE      COUNT(*)
201                   1
202                   1
204                   3But it wasnt outputing the zeros so i tried using the follwoing statements:
select aun_code,sum(case when rr_transaction.trans_code = 'MAN_SUSPEND' then 1 else 0 end)
from rr_transaction
group by aun_code
SELECT AUN_CODE,
count(case when trans_code = 'MAN_SUSPEND' then 1 end)
FROM rr_transaction
GROUP BY AUN_CODE
These two statements do give me the desire output
of :
AUN_CODE      COUNT(*)
200                   0
201                   1
202                   1
204                   3etc
But when i try using these select statments in my data model in Oracle reports it creates the query box with a broken data link icon and wont let me join it to other queries (the aun_code is the primary key)
Im abit stumped why it will work the first select statement but not the other two!??

Much nicer than my paltry attempt.
select iv2.object_type,nvl(object_count,0) object_count
  from
SELECT object_type,
            COUNT(object_id) object_count 
  FROM user_objects
WHERE object_type  in ('TABLE' ,'FUNCTION','INDEX','PACKAGE')
GROUP BY object_type
) iv1
(select distinct object_type
              from user_objects) iv2
           where iv2.object_type = iv1.object_type(+)

Similar Messages

  • PCA Functional Area Report Problem With Co-Product Settlements

    I have built a profit center functional area report for use in a manufacturing client.  The reason is because the factory cost centers flow to the product cost (via costing sheets) and the administrative cost centers are expensed monthly.  However, SAP seems to have no other approach to handle the issue where common expense elements must be reported in these two separate sections.  Anyway, here is my problem:
    After creating the functional areas and matching them to each cost center appropriately and then applying a different functional area to orders, I see that settlement of co-products causes my report to zero out the functional area that should match the overhead cost centers.  These obviously should not be impacted by settlement and I see that they are not impacted in the transactional data.  However, the functional area report shows a different story.  I believe it somehow has to do with the unusual way that co-product split up and settle versus other types of orders.  I may need some sort of subtitution rule, but like I said, the raw transactional data looks correct and the report should bring in these values. 
    I used ledger 8A if that helps.  I am sure I missed some small thing somewhere.
    David

    It looks to me like the New G/L may have taken care of some of my issue.  The FI reconciliation G/L account (690000 usually) includes the secondary cost center postings as well as the secondary order postings.  The cost center side of the secondary transaction reflects the functional area for cost centers (Factory Exp or Admin Exp in my case), whereas the order side of the secondary posting shows the functional area associated with order consumption (Net Consumption in our case). 
    This appears to mean that the standard report for Functional Areas from FI should work to break up the income statement for manufacturing purposes.  This report is S_PLO_86000029.  That report looks to me like it will replace my need for a PCA based Functional Area Report.
    David

  • Decimal places diferent in BO SUM function than from DB

    Hi,
    I have a column from a Netezza database with 2 decimal places, if I apply a sum() function in BO (report) the decimal places are 4.
    The strange part is that if i do exact the same query in a DB2 database the decimal places are always two (like in DB) even if i use a sum function in report.
    There is some configuration regarding the database i'm using to set the decimal places in the report level to be the same than in DB?
    Edited: I've been studing the problem and I found using a odbc instead of a jdbc makes all the columns have 2 decimal places, and the sum problem doesn't happen. Now my issue is the division. How is possible that with the exact same values with two decimal positions, in BO and exporting to excel the last decimal place is different in some cases
    Example:
    Lets say A/B with A=13549678065,560000 and B= 21629484348,690000. With Netezza result is 62,6444803173527 and Db2  62,6444803173528
    Thanks for your time.

    I've never seen this particular problem before. Quite strange. It sounds more like an OLAP or SQL Server issue, not BPC.
    I'm not aware of any configuration on SQL server that allows you to control the decimal separator.
    I had a similar problem in the past, when my customer refused to follow the install guide instructions, and insisted that the server be set to non-US English regional settings. If I recall, the issue had to do with date formats not decimal separators. They ended up un-installing and re-installing the entire OS (with US English setup, the second time around), and then it worked fine. This was back on 5.0, and perhaps the situation has changed since then. There's a section in the master / install guide that covers the server-side language & regional settings in some detail.
    But before you look at that, try something easier -- is it possible that the cube is somehow corrupted? Do you get any errors when you process the application? Perhaps there is some data in the fact table with an invalid member ID.
    Do you get the same result in your Excel report when you use both EVDRE and EVGET?
    And if you browse the cube data in SQL Mgmt Studio (logging into the Analysis Services cube) do you see aggregated data there?
    Regards,
    Tim

  • COUNT() and SUM() function it not working in XDO file.

    Hi ,
    I am getting one error. Count and sum function not working proper.
    For example :
    Department 10 have 3 employee and total salary is 8750. But my report returning total employee 1 and total salary 5000
    10
    Ename Sal
    KING 5000
    CLARK 2450
    MILLER 1300
    ==================
    total employee : 1
    total salary : 5000
    Kindly help me solve this problem.
    <dataTemplate name="TEXT">
    <properties>
    <property value="upper" name="xml_tag_case" />
    </properties>
    <lexicals>
    </lexicals>
    <dataQuery>
    <sqlstatement name="Q_TEMP">
    <![CDATA[SELECT DEPTNO,DNAME,LOC FROM DEPT]]>
    </sqlstatement>
    <sqlstatement name="Q_TEMP1">
    <![CDATA[SELECT ENAME,HIREDATE,SAL FROM EMP WHERE DEPTNO = :DEPTNO]]>
    </sqlstatement>
    </dataQuery>
    <datastructure>
    <GROUP name="G_1" source="Q_TEMP">
    <element value="DEPTNO" name="DEPTNO" />
    <element value="DNAME" name="DNAME" />
    <element value="LOC" name="LOC" />
    <GROUP name="G_2" source="Q_TEMP1">
    <element value="ENAME" name="ENAME" />
    <element value="SAL" name="SAL" />
    <element value="G_2.ENAME" name="TOTL_DETAILS" dataType="number" function="COUNT()" />
    <element value="G_2.SAL" name="TOTL_SAL" function="SUM()"/>
    </GROUP>
    </GROUP>
    </datastructure>
    </dataTemplate>
    Thanks
    Yudhi

    Please have the data structure as below:
    <datastructure>
    <GROUP name="G_1" source="Q_TEMP">
    <element value="DEPTNO" name="DEPTNO" />
    <element value="DNAME" name="DNAME" />
    <element value="LOC" name="LOC" />
    <GROUP name="G_2" source="Q_TEMP1">
    <element value="ENAME" name="ENAME" />
    <element value="SAL" name="SAL" />
    *</GROUP>*
    *<element value="G_2.ENAME" name="TOTL_DETAILS" dataType="number" function="COUNT()" />*
    *<element value="G_2.SAL" name="TOTL_SAL" function="SUM()"/>*
    *</GROUP>*
    </datastructure>
    Aggregate functions to be placed at the level you require it. Here you need at G_1, so place it there.

  • Sum() function not working properly. Instead of summing, its showing total count of the rows

    We have migrated one application from .net framework 1.0 to .net framework  2 (from Visual studio 2003 to Visual STUDIO 2005). Now after migration we are facing some problem related to the sum function in Crystal report 10. It is not working properly.
    So we migrated to Crystal report XI release 2 (though still using evaluation version for testing purpose), the problem is not yet resolved.
    The problem we are facing is while using the summary in the group field, it is showing the number of rows instead of the sum of the values.
    We have checked the same with min-max functions, and it is working properly with those.
    We have tried to make the sum by formula field. In such case, it is not showing any syntactical error but at execution time, it is throwing an error saying "A number field or currency amount field is required here".
    In the  the report the datatype of the field on which we are applying the sum function, is number, and in the table from where the data is fetched, the datatype is numeric(9,6).
    Any idea why sum function is not working ?
    I was browsing the net and saw running totals can be a work around for such summation issues in Crystal Report XI.
    Can you please provide insight of how to implement running totals for summation purpose in solving such issues.

    Hi,
    Running totals are more accurate than Summary Totals in Crystal.  Why? ...ask Crystal.  Anyway, just right click on Running Totals, create a new one, and enter you fields, etc. For group totals, it gives you a place to reset the totals for each group, etc.  Pretty self explainatory. 
    Jim

  • Sum function not working properly in Crystal XI. Its showing total count of the values

    We have migrated one application from .net framework 1.0 to .net framework  2 (from Visual studio 2003 to Visual STUDIO 2005). Now after migration we are facing some problem related to the sum function in Crystal report 10. It is not working properly.
    So we migrated to Crystal report XI release 2 (though still using evaluation version for testing purpose), the problem is not yet resolved.
    The problem we are facing is while using the summary in the group field, it is showing the number of rows instead of the sum of the values.
    We have checked the same with min-max functions, and it is working properly with those.
    We have tried to make the sum by formula field. In such case, it is not showing any syntactical error but at execution time, it is throwing an error saying "A number field or currency amount field is required here".
    In the  the report the datatype of the field on which we are applying the sum function, is number, and in the table from where the data is fetched, the datatype is numeric(9,6).
    Any idea why sum function is not working ?
    I was browsing the net and saw running totals can be a work around for such summation issues in Crystal Report XI.
    Can you please provide insight of how to implement running totals for summation purpose in solving such issues.

    Are you seeing this happen in the Crystal designer as well, outside of any .NET application?

  • Problem with group by and sum function

    In one of the report I'm using grioup by clause on one column. However when I use this function the sum function on other column is not working.
    Any idea how we can resolve this?

    Hi Tintin,
    Follow the below steps:
    1) On the order number column formula, use the max function.
    2) Duplicate the revenue column in the RPD, set the aggregation to sum and level to transaction. This will give you the sum of all the orders in a particular trasaction, where as in report you will see only the max account number.
    Assign points if helpful.
    Thanks,
    -Amith.

  • Why does the sum function not work when I try to add a column of decimal numbers?  The value is always returned as 0.  No problem with whole numbers but decimals do not work!

    just bought a MacBook Air and using Numbers to make a spreadsheet for financial purposes.  The sum function is working ok for whole numbers but when I try to sum a column of 2 decimal place numbers the result always comes back as 0.  Can anyone help?

    Hi laura,
    I suspect that your 2 decimal place numbers are formatted as text. Change the format of the column to currency and see it that works.
    Also You might want to update your profile to reflect your current systems!
    quinn

  • Error when using SUM function in Excel template

    I am trying to use the XDO_METADATA to create a sum of a column from my XML data and I am getting the following error in the Template Viewer:
    [111412_104246459][][PROCEDURE] Log Level is changed to PROCEDURE
    [111412_104246553][oracle.xdo.common.xml.XSLTWrapper][ERROR] XSL error:
    Time: 0.125 sec.
    FO Formatting failed.
    <Line 317, Column 116>: XML-23029: (Error) FORG0001: invalid value for cast/constructor
    @Line 317 ==> <Cell Index="2" Style="R7C3" Field="XDO_?SUM_V_CR_MO_IDD1?"><xsl:value-of select="sum(.//G_CR_MST_D/V_CR_MO_IDD)"/>
    when I use:
    XDO_?SUM_V_CR_MO_IDD1?     <?sum(.//G_CR_MST_D/V_CR_MO_IDD)?>
    or
    [111412_104048508][][PROCEDURE] Log Level is changed to PROCEDURE
    [111412_104048554][oracle.xdo.common.xml.XSLTWrapper][ERROR] XSL error:
    Time: 0.078 sec.
    FO Formatting failed.
    <Line 317, Column 105>: XML-23029: (Error) FORG0001: invalid value for cast/constructor
    @Line 317 ==> <Cell Index="2" Style="R7C3" Field="XDO_?SUM_V_CR_MO_IDD1?"><xsl:value-of select="sum(.//V_CR_MO_IDD)"/>
    when I use:
    XDO_?SUM_V_CR_MO_IDD1?     <?sum(.//V_CR_MO_IDD)?>
    I believe the XSL to be correct because when I change it to a count it works and when I go into BI Publisher 11g and create the query in the data model and then create a summary from it, the summary is created.
    Can anyone help?

    I went back to basics and created reports (via EXCEL templates) like I was asking based on good old EMP and DEPT and I found exactly the same problems I was mentioning. I looked at the templates provided but they were not calculating totals, like me they were selecting them and then just displaying them on the page.
    Anyway, I have narrowed it down to the fact that when you do aggregates like sum(.//SAL) this works if you have a salary for every value. I did an outer join with DEPT so I did have empty rows and why I still experienced the problems.
    Basically XSL does not like adding (including using the sum function) values that effectively have nulls in them which is why I get the cast/constructor errors because it is trying to turn a NaN value to a number and does not (or cannot) do it.
    You need to either have a value in every row of your column (maybe possible by selecting nvl in your query) and make sure that you check the "create empty nodes" checkbox in the data model of BI Publisher.,
    the other solution is an xsl solution where you would have to make sure that you only added non null values and for that you would have to investigate xsl blogs.
    It is, by the way, why my count worked because it is just counting that the record exists it does not care what the element content is or isn't.
    Closing thread.

  • Issues using SUM Function in query

    I have pasted two queries Query1 (calculating counts for total_ships and ships_released) and Query2 (calculating the two same counts and then calculating SUM for total_shipments and I am having problem in this)
    Query 1:
    select  b.loc , b.week, b.vvalue2, b.Total_ships, nvl(a.up_date,'None') as datee , nvl( a.ships_rel_total,0) as Total_released
    from (
          SELECT l.loc  , sr1.vvalue1 as Week, sr.vvalue2 , to_char(ss.udate, 'YYYY-MM-DD') as up_date ,  count(distinct s.ship_id ) as ships_rel_total
          FROM ship s, loct l,
             ship_num sr1,  ship_num sr, ship_stat ss, ship_stat ss1
          WHERE ......
          Group by l.loc , sr1.vvalue1, sr.vvalue2 , to_char(ss.udate, 'YYYY-MM-DD')
          ) A,
    ( SELECT distinct l.loc  , sr1.vvalue1 as Week, sr.vvalue2 , count(s.ship_id ) as Total_Ships
          FROM ship s, loct l,
              ship_num sr1,  ship_num sr, ship_stat ss, ship_stat ss1
          WHERE ......
          Group by c.loc , c.week , c.vvalue2  ) B
    where a.loc (+) = b.loc
    and a.vvalue2  (+) = b.vvalue2
    order by b.loc, b.week , b.vvalue2,a.up_date; Query 1 Output:
    *OUTPUT*
    LOC         WEEK          VALUE2        TOTAL_SHIPS       DATEE         TOtAL_SHIPS_RELEASED
    AA          111              BB              12                  10-05-12            2
    AA          111              BB              12                  11-05-12            4
    AA          111              CC              2                    14-05-12            1Then I added sum function for total_ships and its not giving me result what I need :(
    Query 2:
    select  b.loc , b.week, b.vvalue2, b.sum_ships, nvl(a.up_date,'None') as datee , nvl( a.ships_rel_total,0) as Total_released
    from (
          SELECT l.loc  , sr1.vvalue1 as Week, sr.vvalue2 , to_char(ss.udate, 'YYYY-MM-DD') as up_date ,  count(distinct s.ship_id ) as ships_rel_total
          FROM ship s, loct l,
             ship_num sr1,  ship_num sr, ship_stat ss, ship_stat ss1
          WHERE ......
          Group by l.loc , sr1.vvalue1, sr.vvalue2 , to_char(ss.udate, 'YYYY-MM-DD')
    ) A,
    ( Select  c.loc, c.week , c.vvalue2 ,  sum(c.total_ships) sum_ships 
    from
        ( SELECT distinct l.loc  , sr1.vvalue1 as Week, sr.vvalue2 , count(s.ship_id ) as Total_Ships
          FROM ship s, loct l,
              ship_num sr1,  ship_num sr, ship_stat ss, ship_stat ss1
          WHERE ......
          Group by l.loc , sr1.vvalue1 , sr.vvalue2  ) C
    Group by c.loc , c.week , c.vvalue2  ) B
    where a.loc (+) = b.loc
    and a.vvalue2  (+) = b.vvalue2
    order by b.loc, b.week , b.vvalue2,a.up_date;  my query is giving me this :(
    Query 2 Output:
    LOC         WEEK          VALUE2        *SUM_SHIPS*       DATEE         TOtAL_SHIPS_RELEASED
    AA          111                BB              26                 10-05-12            2
    AA          111                BB              26                 11-05-12            4
    AA          111                CC              26                 14-05-12            1
    But I need a result like this:
    LOC         WEEK          VALUE2        SUM_SHIPS       DATEE         TOtAL_SHIPS_RELEASED
    AA          111                BB              14              10-05-12            2
    AA          111                BB              14              11-05-12            4
    AA          111                CC              14              14-05-12            1

    Hi,
    It sounds like you have a Fan Trap , where a one-to-many relationship is causing some items to be counted many times.
    The usual solution is to compute the aggregates before doing the one-to-many join. Analytic functions may make this simpler.
    Sorry, I can't show you exactly how to do it without the exact data.
    Post CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements for all tables involved, and also post the results you want from that data (if different from what you've already posted).
    Explain, using specific examples, how you get those results from that data.
    Simplify the problem as much as possible. If the problem only concerns the total_ships column, then only post the data needed to compute total_ships. This includes all the columns involved in the joins and GROUP BY clauses.
    Always say which version of Oracle you're using (e.g., 11.2.0.2.0).
    See the forum FAQ {message:id=9360002}

  • Please suggest solutiion for calling a plsql function in report

    Hi,
    I did a small project using forms and reports 6i. Now i prepared a repor that will calucalate the sum(expenditure)per report level. Now the problem is i want to print the sum which is in number form , in words. That is if the sum is 50000 then i want to print "fifty thousand". For this conversion from number to figure i wrote a small programme , which successfully compiled and created a function.
    Now I want to create a field in the report and in which I want to call this plsql function and perform the number conversion of sum(expenditure)per report field. Please describe in detail how to make reference between these two fields i.e sum(expenditure)per report and field in which I want to run plsql code and thereby converting the sum into figures.
    the programme i used to convert currency from number to words is please see link.http:/orafaq.com/scripts/cheqprint.txt
    Thanks in advance
    Prasanth a.s.

    Hi,
    If the amount does not exceed more than 5,373,484 then you can use the following method to print the number in words.
    Test Db>Select to_char( to_date(5373484,'J'),'Jsp') from dual ;
    TO_CHAR(TO_DATE(5373484,'J'),'JSP')
    Five Million Three Hundred Seventy-Three Thousand Four Hundred Eighty-Four
    There's no need to write DB function unless you are sure that the value can exceed 5373484.
    You can do the following :
    1. Create a Summary column on the report column on which you want the data summed - Report level or at any level required
    2. Create a Formula Column - Report Level or any other level - Wherever required [ Same level as in Step 1]
    3. The trigger text of this formula column would use the column which is summation of the Expenditure field column (Summary Column) and this function should return Varchar2
    Declare
    lSumInWords Varchar2(1000) := Null;
    Begin
    Select TO_CHAR(TO_DATE(:CS_1,'J'),'JSP')
    Into lSumInWords
    From dual;
    Return (lSumInWords);
    End;
    3. In Your report layout, use this formula column for printing.
    Good Luck.
    -- Shailender Mehta --

  • Reg: sum() function in XML

    HI frs,
    while using sum function in Xml.not getting correct output.
    for ex:
    i have created report with emp table.
    load the xml into MS-Word.
    i want to sum total of salary of employees.
    i used SUM() function to calculate but in output it adds twice the first value and adds the rest
    for ex :
    these are values
    200
    300
    500
    i am gettting total like 1200 actually it should be 1000.
    it adds like 200+200+300+500
    why is it so.
    Regards
    Rajesh

    Hi,
    I have a problem with the 'l_booklist', I declare it as 'l_booklist  TYPE REF TO if_ixml_node' like in the interface but a shortdump comes up. must it be filled?
    greets
    Thomas

  • SUM function resulting WRONG values when some cell contains a string

    A very strange problem that can result in wrong financial calculations and big mistakes...
    If we have SUM function for some range of cells and one of them is treated as text string (I mean it's number in fact but Number is sure it's text string). than SUM function calulates ALL cells except this sell silently without errors and results in wrong result.
    For example we have cells and values
    A B
    =====
    1| 15 USD
    2| 0 USD
    3| 37 USD
    4| 1 USD
    5| 3 USD
    here the function SUM(B1:B5) should provide the result "56 USD"
    But if cell B5 is treated as text string (it can be still displayed as "3 USD" so we don't know it's treated as text string for some reason) than SUM(B1:B5) swill answer "53 USD".
    The problem is we DON'T know cell B5 is treated as text and we are fully sure that we have the correct sum of all 5 cells, in reality we see sum of 4 cells only....
    I think anybody working with financial or other important data can imagine how dangerous this SUM behaviour is.... I encountered several times that when importing data from Excel or by other ways numbers are imported as text strings. So if I have a lot of cells I'm not sure if all those cells are correctly styled or some of them for some unknown reason is treated as text string.
    In Microsoft Excel there is a very right solution. In MS Excel if any cell in the SUM is wrong format the SUM function simply provides error as a result. But in Numbers SUM doesn't tell us about error, it simply provides us with a wrong result!
    With formal logic the way SUM works in Numbers is total idiotism. If I ask to SUM B1:B5 than I definitely ask to sum ALL 5 cells, not 4, not 3, not 6 but 5 definite cells. If Numbers can't sum those exactly those 5 cells the only answer of the function should be ERROR.
    But Apple Numbers answers me some result of summing those cells that it's able to sum. Apple Numbers SUM function is not confused that I asked for SUM of 5 (not 4 or 3) cells and I expect to have this sum as a result.
    In fact Apple uses the right logic when we use another formula. If we use =B1B2+B3+B4B5 and any cell contains text string that we'll have error result the sam as in Microsoft Excel. So in this example Numbers behaves correctly.
    So why SUM (B1:B5) can provide totally different result as =B1B2+B3+B4B5?

    alexb2 wrote:
    So when I set format for my number as my local currency it's displayed as 123 XXX (XXX is my currency but it's not in latin). I see it's not only displayed but also stored as 123 XXX. That's different from Excel that stores only numbers in cells and shows number with prefix or suffix - Numbers storex number with prefix or suffix.
    No, you get this behavior because the original sheet is displaying values as currencies. I assumes that the import process pass it as a string because he doesn't recognize it as a currency value. As far as I know, Numbers stores the currency entries as a pure number and an indicator of the used currency.
    Here is an example.
    (a) the description of the numerical value (I underlined it: 456)
    <sf:number-cell sf:flags="4" sf:value="456" sf:col="1" sf:row="2">
    <sf:cell-style-ref sfa:IDREF="SFTCellStyle-46"/>
    <sf:content-size sfa:w="58.659881591796875" sfa:h="14"/>
    </sf:number-cell>
    (b) the description of the format (I underlined the used currency: XAM)
    <sf:cell-style sfa:ID="SFTCellStyle-46" sf:cell-style-default-line-height="12" sf:parent-ident="tabular-Basic-body-cell-style-id">
    <sf:property-map>
    <sf:SFTCellStylePropertyNumberFormat>
    <sf:number-format sfa:ID="SFTNumberFormat-23" sf:format-type="1" sf:format-string="#,##0.00 &#xA4;;-#,##0.00 &#xA4;" sf:format-decimal-places="2" sf:format-currency-code="XAM" sf:format-negative-style="0" sf:format-show-thousands-separator="true" sf:format-fraction-accuracy="-3" sf:format-use-accounting-style="false"/>
    </sf:SFTCellStylePropertyNumberFormat>
    <sf:SFTCellStylePropertyImplicitFormatType>
    <sf:number sfa:number="256" sfa:type="i"/>
    </sf:SFTCellStylePropertyImplicitFormatType>
    <sf:SFTCellStylePropertyFormatType>
    <sf:number sfa:number="257" sfa:type="i"/>
    </sf:SFTCellStylePropertyFormatType>
    </sf:property-map>
    </sf:cell-style>
    Of course, if the original currency string is not recognized, it can't be described as such a feature and the value is treated as a simple string.
    So may be at some moment my 123 XXX is treated like string value.
    Yes, find and replace is a nice tool when importing data - thanks for the tip. the last problem is with already Numbers files that were imported not today (or even createde as Numbers file) where some cell becomes string value after some editing.
    Here again, if you edit a currency string and replace it to a not recognized one, the result will be logically a string.
    There is an other way to give this result:
    copy a value from a cell formatted as XAM currency (just an example)
    paste it in a cell whose format is currency Euro (once again it's just an example).
    The result will be a string.
    The culprit is not the program, it's the user.
    I had several times this situation and last time I found error only because I have my budget in 2 programs - in Numbers and in another special budgeting program. As each program has advantages I have in fact 2 instances of the same budget.
    And when I changed some string in Numbers and another program I noticed the sum is different. I was sure it's another program somewhere buggy but noticed than Numbers simply ignores one of the budget strings and sums without it... In fact it was even not the string I changed, I remember I changed the buggy string about a week ago but I haven't compared budgets that time so my budget had a mistake for some time till I noticed it. If I used only Numbers without copy of budget in another program may be even today I won't notice the mistake.
    The same situation happened not once.
    I think that the choice made by Apple for SUM() is correct. You feel that it is wrong. It's useless to debate more, we will not change the behavior of the function.
    I try to give a workaround.
    The neater one is to add columns as I described in my first response.
    The given formula will clearly flag cells which aren't containing numerical values. If you move the SUM from the original range to the new one, the oddities will be flagged automatically.
    Here is an alternate workaround:
    The currency is XAM.
    In B4 I introduced a typo so the value is no longer a numerical one.
    Given that, the sum in the footer doesn't count the 34 (which is the normal behavior).
    In column C1 I entered =1*B
    which flagged the bad cell.
    The alternate is to use an auxiliary table like aux1
    In A1 I entered:
    =IF(ISERROR(INDIRECT(ADDRESS(ROW(),COLUMN(),,,"main"))),"",IF(ISBLANK(INDIRECT(A DDRESS(ROW(),COLUMN(),,,"main"))),"",1*INDIRECT(ADDRESS(ROW(),COLUMN(),,,"main") )))
    Exactly the same formula in B1, C1, D1, …
    So, the table will automatically grab the contents of the main table (just take care to insert more columns in aux1 than in main)
    In the footer row of aux1, insert a sum formula for columns where there is required.
    Looking at this footer will flag columns where a value may be "wrong" so, it will be necessary (but easy) to scan the column's content to find the red triangle(s).
    Yvan KOENIG (from FRANCE lundi 13 octobre 2008 13:27:40)

  • How to correct XML Output in Cross Tab Template for sum function?

    I have designed a Cross Tab Template to summarize R12 Account Analysis data by Period by Party_name. The template is doing what I want it to do with the exception of amount. I have a function in the sum(accounted_net) field and it will only display 0.00 even though I know there are actual amount. Can someone help in looking at my template to see what I have done wrong?
    Here is the sum funciton.
    <?if:count(current-group()[CCID_SOURCE=$ABC])?><?sum(current-group()[CCID_SOURCE=$ABC]/ACCOUNTED_NET)?> <?end if?>
    CCID_SOURCE is an element I created in XML to concatnate CCID and Party_name for grouping. $ABC is a variable that I defined for "CCID_SOURCE" to check if there is null value for a specific ccid_party. If it's null, it won't do the sum function, otherwise it will sum the accounted_net for the period_name, party_name.
    Thank you for your help.
    Stacey

    Figured this out on our own

  • SUM function issue

    Hi everyone,
    I have a problem with SUM function in SQL query on Oracle 11g database. Maybe you will be able to help me.
    Problem:
    I want to shows summary costs for shipments separately for each service provider and for each month they did the shipments.
    Data is stored in SHIPMENT AND SHIPMENT_COST table as shown below. The problem is that summary function I use sums base costs (marked as B in SHIPMENT_COST table) for each accessorial cost (marked as A in SHIPMENT_COST table). In example for shipment 10005031 we have 4 accessorial costs so it shows 6120 in BASE_COST column. I tried to use distinct in summary but then we have a problem with shipment id 201307133713_0383 which has 3 base costs equal to 221.54 so with distinct it will show 221.54 instead of 221.54x3.
    SHIPMENT table:
    START_TIME               SHIPMENT_GID               SERVPROV_GID
    2013-06-25                    10005031                         T222176
    2013-06-15                    201307133713_0383          T76180
    SHIPMENT_COST table:
    SHIPMENT_GID                        COST                                       COST_TYPE
    10005031                                 1530                                        B
    10005031                                  30.6                                        A
    10005031                                  120                                         A
    10005031                                  400                                         A
    10005031                                  100                                         A
    201307133713_0383                   221.54                                    B
    201307133713_0383                   221.54                                    B
    201307133713_0383                   221.54                                    B
    RESULT table:
    SHIPMENT_START_DATE
    SERVPROV
    BASE_COST
    CLAIM_COST
    06/2013
    T76180
    664.62
    null
    06/2013
    T222176
    6120
    650.6
    Query:
    SELECT DISTINCT TO_CHAR(SH.START_TIME,'MM/YYYY') AS SHIPMENT_START_DATE,
            SH.SERVPROV_GID AS SERVPROV,
            SUM(SHCOST.COST) AS BASE_COST,
            SUM(SHCOST_CLAIM.COST) AS CLAIM_COST
    FROM    SHIPMENT SH,
            SHIPMENT SHC
            LEFT OUTER JOIN SHIPMENT_COST SHCOST ON (SHC.SHIPMENT_GID = SHCOST.SHIPMENT_GID AND SHCOST.COST_TYPE = 'B'),
            SHIPMENT SHC_CLAIM
            LEFT OUTER JOIN SHIPMENT_COST SHCOST_CLAIM ON (SHC_CLAIM.SHIPMENT_GID = SHCOST_CLAIM.SHIPMENT_GID AND SHCOST_CLAIM.COST_TYPE = 'A')
    WHERE 1=1
            AND SHC.SHIPMENT_GID = SH.SHIPMENT_GID
            AND SHC_CLAIM.SHIPMENT_GID = SH.SHIPMENT_GID
            AND    SH.SHIPMENT_GID IN ('10005031','201307133713_0383')
            GROUP BY TO_CHAR(SH.START_TIME,'MM/YYYY'),
            SH.SERVPROV_GID
    Best Regards,
    Łukasz

    with SHIPMENT (START_TIME,SHIPMENT_GID,SERVPROV_GID) as
    select to_date('2013-06-25','yyyy-mm-dd'),'10005031','T222176' from dual union all
    select to_date('2013-06-15','yyyy-mm-dd'),'201307133713_0383','T76180' from dual
    SHIPMENT_COST(SHIPMENT_GID,COST,COST_TYPE)
    as
    select '10005031','1530','B' from dual union all
    select '10005031','30.6','A' from dual union all
    select '10005031','120','A' from dual union all
    select '10005031','400','A' from dual union all
    select '10005031','100','A' from dual union all
    select '201307133713_0383','221.54','B' from dual union all
    select '201307133713_0383','221.54','B' from dual union all
    select '201307133713_0383','221.54','B' from dual
    select *
      from (select to_char(t.START_TIME, 'mm/yyyy'),
                   t.SERVPROV_GID,
                   c.COST,
                   c.COST_TYPE
              from SHIPMENT t
              join SHIPMENT_COST c
                on t.SHIPMENT_GID = c.SHIPMENT_GID)
    pivot(sum(COST) for COST_TYPE in('A' CLAIM_COST,'B' BASE_COST))
    TO_CHAR(T.START_TIME,'MM/YYYY'
    SERVPROV_GID
    CLAIM_COST
    BASE_COST
    06/2013
    T76180
    664.62
    06/2013
    T222176
    650.6
    1530
    Ramin Hashimzade

Maybe you are looking for