Creating a new tax structure.
Good morning all,
Please advise, how to create a new tax structure (the complete steps)?
Thanks,
Balaji
hi balaji,
Visit service market place(www.service.sap.com)
documentation.If you are using B version,
Go to How to guides in modules and features
and refer document 'Localization in 2005B.pdf'.
Jeyakanthan
Similar Messages
-
Hi
I want to create a new Tax Structure of Tax Code for - Vat 14% on 75% Inventorised + S.T. 10.3% on 100% Inventorised.
Can you help me out the configuration steps.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Kshipra GHi,
Create Calculation Procedure :
Path :Financial Accounting (New)>Financial Accounting Global Settings (New)>Tax on Sales/Purchases>Basic Settings>Check Calculation Procedure T.code:OBYZ
Assign Country to Calculation Procedure :
Path :Financial Accounting (New)>Financial Accounting Global Settings (New)>Tax on Sales/Purchases>Basic Settings>Assign Country to Calculation Procedure T.code: OBBG
Define Tax Codes for Sales and Purchases :
Path :Financial Accounting (New)>Financial Accounting Global Settings (New)>Tax onSales/Purchases-->Calculation->Define Tax Codes for Sales and Purchases T.code : FTXP
Define Tax Accounts :
Path:Financial Accounting (New)>Financial Accounting Global Settings (New)>TaxonSales/Purchases>Posting>Define Tax Accounts T.code : OB40
Create Tax Conditions and Tax percentage : T.code FV11
Thanks,
Raviteja -
Hi all,
I'm creating a new SIS info structure with MC21.
When save, the system warns me the followiing.
The warning appears when I remove the sales org. as characteristics.
My query is that what should I do? How to know which characteristcs link to the unit? Thanks.
Warning: inconsistencies may occur when units updated => please check
Message no. M2 314
Diagnosis
The characteristics you have chosen could lead to inconsistencies in the updating of the units.
Example:
The information structure does not contain a characteristic that clearly indicates the currency in which data is to be updated (for example, the sales organization); furthermore, the currency itself is not a characteristic of the information structure. If documents in differing currencies are now updated to the statistics, this can cause the system to add different values together in a data record.
Procedure
There are two possible ways you can guarantee that updating is consistent:
1. Add a field to your information structure that clearly identifies the unit, or add the unit itself as a characteristic.
2. Make sure that only documents which clearly refer to a unit are created.Forgot to attach the code:
<cfset cfc_array = arrayNew(1) />
<cfset cfc_info = structNew() />
<cfset cfc_info.type = "error" />
<cfset cfc_info.message = "User Name and Password are both
required." />
<cfset ArrayAppend(cfc_array,cfc_info) />
<cfset cfc_info = structNew() />
<cfset cfc_info.type = "error" />
<cfset cfc_info.message = "dgdfgdgd dgdg dg dfg " />
<cfset ArrayAppend(cfc_array,cfc_info) />
<cfset cfc_info = structNew() />
<cfset cfc_info.type = "error" />
<cfset cfc_info.message = "Another structure test" />
<cfset ArrayAppend(cfc_array,cfc_info) />
<cfif isDefined("cfc_array")>
<cfdump var="#cfc_array#" />
<cfloop index="message" array="#cfc_array#">
<cfoutput>TYPE = #message.type# MESSAGE =
#message.message#<br /></cfoutput>
</cfloop>
</cfif> -
i want to ceate a new tax code which should do calculation as follows:
base 100
cst 4% 4
s.t 12.36% 12.36
total 116.36
what are the field that have to be filled uHi Sanjeev,
Goto FTXP,
give country - In
press enter
give tax cd(any two letter code) and press enter
you will get a new pop up window in that give the description for your tax code
select tax type- i.e, if you are maintaining a tax code for input tax (purchase tax) select ' v ' and if it is output tax (sales tax) select ' A '
click on continue
give tax percentage accordingly
click on tax account tab and assign the relevant gl a/c and click on continue
and then save.
Hope this will be helpful to you..
Regards..
Jyothi -
Error in account determination ( Created a new tax code for CST 2%)
Dear friends,
iam facing a problem while doing vf01.the error is o account detrmination for jn7 which is for condition type CST.
My customer master is also checked
I have maintained the account key and GL a/c for ers,erl,erf,jn6,jn7 etc in tcode vkoa.
I have also mainatined the GL a/c for jn7 in tcode ob40 also.
In ftxp also the rates are maintained.
I have also maintained the condtion record for UTXJ in vk11 tcode.
Now still i dont know if i have missed out some step in customizing or mainatining some record
I have a doubt in ob40. Lets say if i have 2 tax codes s7 & s8 , Do i need to maintain the G/L account for both tax codes?correct na. But in FTXP The G/L account is assigned automatically, inspite of that do i need to maintain ?
Pls clarify, & Wishing u all a colourful HOLI in advance
Thanks in advance
RegardsDear SD teamsters,
iam facing a problem while doing vf01.the error is account detrmination for jn7 which is for condition type CST.
My customer master is also checked
I have maintained the account key and GL a/c for ers,erl,erf,jn6,jn7 etc in tcode vkoa.
I have also mainatined the GL a/c for jn7 in tcode ob40 also.
In ftxp also the rates are maintained.
I have also maintained the condtion record for UTXJ in vk11 tcode.
Now still i dont know if i have missed out some step in customizing or mainatining some record
I have a doubt in ob40. Lets say if i have 2 tax codes s7 & s8 , Do i need to maintain the G/L account for both tax codes?cBut in FTXP The G/L account is assigned automatically, inspite of that do i need to maintain ?
In OB40 there are two rules displayed, one is taxcode & the other is debit & credit . which do i need to select.
Regards
G.S.Gupta -
Library creating a new duplicate folder structure
I am using 2.0 on a Mac. Recently I moved all my data files including photos and lightroom catalogs from an external to an internal drive on my MacPro and renamed the new drive with the same name as the external and changed the external name and it became a backup. Lightroom continued to work just fine, seeing all the images with no problem. If I do a "Show in Finder" it shows me them on the internal HD. However, when I import a new image or even import an image or folder that has previously been imported, LR brings it in within a new folder structure that uses the same hard drive name.
My actual hard drive folder structure for my data drive is something like HardDriveName/Graphics/Airshows/image.jpg with all my images in a Graphics folder and within that a series of folders and subfolders.
Previously if I imported a new folder, LR would show HardDriveName/NewFolder and I have several folders of imported images with that structure. It did not include the /Graphics folder because I never imported the entire Graphics folder. Now however, after importing a folder, LR created a new folder structure in the Library with a duplicate of the HardDriveName and it included /Graphics.
I went to the first folder structure and picked a small folder and made a change to an image to darken it a great deal. Then I imported the folder all over again and it imported it to the new folder structure but the dark version was not visible. I DO have automatically write xmp data checked.
If I right click on any image from either folder structure LR shows me the image within the same hard drive where my original are found.
I don't want to have two folder structures and apparently if I re-import all my images LR doesn't see the xmp data. I tried to tell RM to read the xmp data from the image I had changed after it came into the new folder but it did not show up. If I manually tell LR to Save Metadata to File for a folder in my original structure and then go to the same folder in the new structure that LR is showing and tell it to read metadata it will show up in the new folder. I have a folder with 32,000+ images and thousands of other images.
I would like LR to continue to bring images into my "old" folder structure but that may not be possible. Any help?
Interestingly I have more than one data drive. This problem does not seem to be happening with my other data drive that I also swapped to an internal configuration.
I put a pic of my folder structure at http://www.pbase.com/santa/image/101246417 to illustrate the issue. My harddrive name shows as Brandon.
I spoke too soon. LR seems to be creating a new folder structure for two of my three hard drives and adding images properly to one of my three hard drives. All three were new drives with the names changed to match the old drives.yes I did update camera raw. I think LR 2.0 asked for that. I did a search on "duplicate" and found no answer to my problem. Anyone with a link to any useful information?
-
Create new tax code for Belgium company code.
Dear friends ,
We are fighting to find a way to create a new tax code for a Belgium company that do the posting below:
Credit: Supplier 1000,00- EUR
Debit: GL Account X 1105,00 EUR
Credit: Tax Account 105,00 EUR
Where the tax rate for the tax code is 10,5%.
Does anyone knows the config we need to do in the procedure TAXB-IVA Belgium , in order to allow SAP to post as we can see above
Tcodes:
OBQ1 / OBQ3
OBCN
OB40
FTXP
Thanks so much.
Alessandrohi Allessandro,
Please check SAP Note 22842 - TAXB - Belgian tax calc. table - special cases, it clearly gives the configuration needs to be done in your case.
Regards
Girish BP -
New Tax condition type created in ECC, replicated to CRM
Hello All,
I have created a new tax condition type in ECC and through initial load replicate the same to CRM. Even pricing procedure repliction with new tax condition is also successful.
But, the new tax condition is not appearing in condition tab at item level when i create quotation in CRM.
Please advise.
Thanks and Regards
DJHi
Iam facing with the same problem we have created new tax conditon in r/3 and we have replicated it into crm we can find in the pricing procedure of crm as the new tax condition type but iam unable to see that in the order conditions tab.
Could you please let me know the solution or could u please provide me witht he solution. to kmasthanrao at gmail com.
Thanks and Regards
Masthan -
Dear Expert,
I am new in SAP so can U plz tell me each steps how to create a new tax code, i have gone through sdn forum but this is not sufficient
my co. requirement is
BED 10%, Cess 2%, HS E Cess 1%, VAT_D 3% (Input).
Kindly tell me every step I will gv U full points.
Thanks in AdvanceHi Expert,
As mentioned above, Go to T-Code: OBYZ,
Firstly select the Conditions, here should define the condition types for the Tax Procedure.
Secondly we have a Access Sequence, were we use pre-defined.
Thirdly we have to create a Tax Procedure, here we need to assign the created condition types and Account Type.
Where Account Types are used to trigger the GL Accounts, we assign GL Accounts in T-Code: OB40 with respect to Account Types.
In T-Code: FTXP, We create a Tax Code and this Tax Code in used in T-Code: FV11, Her we maintain the percentage with respect to the Combination and Tax Code, this combination are pre-defined(i.e., Access Sequence)
and Configure complete CIN Settings from the below link:
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/207dd2ad-bf92-2b10-a88b-e3a4a01ca7fc?QuickLink=index&overridelayout=true
Maintain CIN Master Data in T-Code: J1ID and for India Localization Menu in T-Code: J1ILN
Regards,
GK
SAP -
New tax code creation and assign..?
Hi gurus
Can anybody explain me how to create new tax structure and were to assign or configure the same tax tax structure For purchasing ..
For example,
service tax structure 12%ecess2%hsecess1% + vat4%..
Pls guide me ..
Thanks
sap-mmhi
1. Define new Condition Types by copying from the existing Condition Types OBYZ
2. Define new Account Keys by copying from the existing Account Keys
(Go to spro-> MM -> purchasng ->condition->define price determination process->define transaction and Event key)
3.go to ur tax procedure and add new condition with account key (acct key will be ur defined acct key) OBYZ
4 define tax account to ur account key OB40
5 create tax code FTXP
then
for taxinn process
cretate tax code with out values
then maintain FV11 for condition type in combination of vendor material and tax code
for taxinj
maintain rates in ftxp
reward if useful
regards
kunal -
My client uses the following Tax structure
Non Exempted Projects
(Custom Duty@10% on (Assessable value) + BED@14% on (Assessable Value + Custom Duty) + BED EDU . Cess@2% on (BED) + BED EDU.CESS (S/H)@1% on (BED) + Custom Duty Edu. Cess@2% on (Custom duty + BED + BED EDU.CESS + BED EDU.CESS (S/H)) + Custom Duty Edu. Cess (S/H)@1% on (Custom duty + BED + BED EDU.CESS + BED EDU.CESS (S/H) + Additional Duty of Customs @4% on (Assessable Value+Custom duty + BED + BED EDU.CESS + BED EDU.CESS (S/H) + Custom Duty Edu. Cess + Custom Duty Edu. Cess (S/H)).
Note: For Capital Goods & Resin the custom duty would be 7.5 % instead of 10 %.
Is it possible to maintain this in SAP B1?
Do I have need to create parameters? and formulas for this?
Regards
ShashiHi Shashi,
I suggest you to create a new Tax Type for CVD and let it be of the CENVAT Type as it is a duty and main purpose of making any Tax Type of CENVAT Type is to know how much Duty you have paid while purchasing so that you can Subtract that with your Sales Duty Amount.
Eg
Consider 3 Raw Materials where you have paid BED as follows while Purchasing.
Raw1 Rs 10
Raw2 Rs 5
Raw3 Rs 8
Total Rs 23
from these raw materials you while manufacture Finished Good Fin1 where BED is Calculated to Rs 45
here as you need to pay Rs 45 Duty amount to Govt, as it has come from selling your Finished Product you will only pay
45-23 = 22
and rest Rs 23 you will inform that you had paid that much of Duty amount while Purchasing the Raw Materials to produce that finished product. these type as i know are usually termed as CENVAT type Tax.
As I'm not that well versed with Finance only know the basic, i would suggest for any further clarifications pls contact your financial consultant, as he would be able to explain better these matters.
I hope this info helps you out
regards,
Shreyas -
Us Payoll : Tax Model Changes : Creation Of A New Tax Class : Impact
Hi Experts,
Has anyone earlier created a new tax class specification of PC 71 for a wagetype so that it is taxed only for a particular tax authority , if yes how did you handle the impact on the other tax authorities ,did you create new entries ( with the new specification ) for other tax authorities as well so that the existing tax calculations happen as it is.
The issue is explained IN DETAIL below :
We have one requirement to include certain wage types X Y Z for the calculation of Transit District Excise Tax /435 in the tax authority ABC
When we checked our system, for these wage types X Y Z the corresponding tax classification is set as 0 ( Regular taxable wages ) which is linked to tax type 1 and not linked to 35 tax type , so we need to assign it to a specification which is having both 1 and 35 tax types. We can assign this to 935 which is linked to both 1 and 35 however this will impact all the wage types that are linked to 0 ( Regular taxable wages ) specification in PC 71.
Our business does not want these other wagetypes to be impacted i.e the requirement is that ONLY X Y Z wagetypes should be included in the calculation of Transit District Exercise Tax /435 for the tax authority ABC.So the option is that we have is to create a new 71 tax class specificaiton say * and assign it to these wagetypes and then create a new entry assining this * in the table T5UTM to 935 for this tax authority so that it is taxed for Transit District Excise Tax /435.
However since we are assigning a new tax class specffication to these wagetypes, there will be a impact on ALL THE OTHER tax authorities where these wagetypes X Y Z are having an old specification of 0 ( Regular taxable wages ). So we have to create newe entries with this new specification * in the table T5UTM so that the current tax calcutions are not impacted.
We have about 500 tax authoties or 500 tax models where we will have to create new entries with the new tax class specirication '" * " , so that these wagetypes are taxed as they are being taxed today, for all of the other tax authorities.
Has anyone earlier created a new tax class specirication of PC 71 , if yes how did you handle the impact on the other tax authorities ,did you create new entries for other tax authorities., which is next to being impossible as we cannot create 500 entries.
Alternatively we are looking at using the TAX MODIFIER for this requirement , please advise if anyone has used TAX MODIFIER for this kind of a requirement mentioned above. Any suggestions are most welcome.
Regards,
Vineeth
Please Dont use Caps letters
Edited by: ModeratorYes we are also referring to the same and this is the actual issue we have , each tax authority has its own tax model. We have to customize (add) this new tax type in the tax models or it won't be considered ( as you have mentioned ).
But we have over 500 different tax models and we cannot be adding this new specification in each tax model , Please advise how this could be handled other than writing a rule. We are just thinking loud if there is anything that we are missing.
These wagetypes are quiet common in all tax authorities , so have to be added in all the tax models i.e. for all tax authorities. -
Us Payoll : Creation Of A New Tax Class
Hi Experts,
Has anyone earlier created a new tax class specification of PC 71 so that it is linked to some tax type.
If yes how did you handle the impact on the other tax authorities when the wagetypes are linked to this specification?
Did you create new entries for other tax authorities?
Thanks in advanceYes we are also referring to the same and this is the actual issue we have , each tax authority has its own tax model. We have to customize (add) this new tax type in the tax models or it won't be considered ( as you have mentioned ).
But we have over 500 different tax models and we cannot be adding this new specification in each tax model , Please advise how this could be handled other than writing a rule. We are just thinking loud if there is anything that we are missing.
These wagetypes are quiet common in all tax authorities , so have to be added in all the tax models i.e. for all tax authorities. -
Dear friends,
User requirement is to create new tax code,requirement is-
Cond.type
Bed. 5% ?
Cess 0.125% ?
Ecess 2% ?
Secs 1% ?
Cst 1% ?
1. I have created a new tax code in FTXP-IN
2. I have assign with co.code
3.In FV11 can you tell me step by step how to do ? and what is condition type and which cond type shall i give ?plz xplain me cond type funda also
Thanks in Advance !!Hi,
In obq1 you create condition type for your steps on which you calculate your BED, Cess, Ecess, Secs, Cst.
For BED,
Suppose create Condition type name JMIP:
Access Seq : JTAX
Cond. class:D
Calc. Type : A
Cond category
Item Condition : Check
For Cess and ECess and Secs :
Access Seq : JTAX
Cond. class:D
Calculation Type :A
Cond category
Item Condition :Checked
For CST:
Access Seq : JST1
Cond. class:D
Calculation Type :A
Cond category
Item Condition : checked
Maintain Condition record for these Condition type.
Regards
Arun -
Dear Expert,
Our user has a requirement for creating a new tax code
requirement is -BED_5%, ECS_2%, SECS_1%, VAT_D_3% (Input)
I have done- in FTXP i have created a new tax code i.e. BT then i hv assign with co.code, what will be next step in FV11 can U tell me ???
Thanks in Advance !Hi,
As per your new tax code the condition types used in the calculation procedure for the TAX code you have to maintain condition record in FV11.
Like for BED you have usen suppose JMIP condition type then go to FV11 and give JMIP condition type there and select country and Tax code condition table and maintain the percentage rate for your tax code.
Same like for the rest of the condition type as per the respective percentage.
Regards
Arun
Maybe you are looking for
-
Accessing web application JAR files from applet
I've got an applet which is part of a web application. All the web application JARs are in the webapps/myappl/WEB-INF/lib directory, and I can't seem to place anything in that directory on the archive attribute of <OBJECT> tag. I'm running into troub
-
[SOLVED] Trying to upgrade GRUB 1.99rc~1 to 2.00-2.
Hello, I was trying to upgrade my version of GRUB from 1.99rc~1 to the latest version (2.00-2) which was recently installed via pacman. I am using grub-bios with an GPT partition. Partition table scan: MBR: protective BSD: not present APM: not presen
-
Where has my Purchase History Gone?!
I've been buying music from iTunes for as long as I can remember - yet my purchase history it's saying I've only ever purchased two songs and no albums - it's all disappeared!! This is showing on all my accounts (iPad and MacBook Pro). I have an iPho
-
Convert from LabVIEW 5 to LabVIEW 2014
hi, I could not open VI. Could you convert this vi to LabVIEW 2014 Attachments: mslumsrs.vi 432 KB mslumsrs.vi 432 KB
-
SCOM network discovery & port stitching with Cisco UCS & Hyper-V and/or VMware
Before we have our network engineers reconfigure their infrastructure to allow network discovery from SCOM, does anyone know whether or not SCOM will include the virtual switches (Hyper-V or VMware), the UCS fabric interconnects, and the hosted virtu