Cross ownership formula

hi experts,
kindly anybody explain difference b/w historical value and actual value in Equity pick-up?
then difference b/w percentage of ownership and percentage of direct ownership?
please explain the formula of cross ownership?
thanks by
850131

Hey Dude,
surely i will reply you whenever i will come to know
and
relax
Please post all these questions separatly on forum in corresponding category.
Me and all other members will answer you in a better way...
and also don't forget to tag answers as helpful or Answer .. just to give the helpful members a vote of thankx
Cheers!
J

Similar Messages

How to use a @PRIOR function with a SubVar in a cross dim formula?

Hi all,
I have a pretty basic logic to calculate a member:
Rate = Account1->Entity->Prior Forecast Year / (Account2->Entity->Prior Forecast Year + Account3->Entity->Prior Forecast Year);
We have a SubVar for the Current Forecast Year, so in my formula I wanted to use @PRIOR(&CurFstYr)
I got an error message: expected type [MEMBER] found [NUMBER] ([@PRIOR]) in function []
The calc validates and runs with no errors if I use &CurFstYr only, which gives me the option to create a Prior Forecast Year subvar: &PriorFstYr. Is this my only option?
I've also tried using SUMRANGE function. The formula validated for @PRIOR(&CurFstYr). Eventhough the calc script validated, the calc stopped after 3 seconds with the below error message:
Error executing formula for [Rate] (line 0): invalid object type
Any idea why the SUMRANGE calc failed to run? Also, once again, is my only option to create a new SubVar for the Prior Forecast Year?
Thanks,
Mehmet
Edited by: Mehmet Sevinc on Mar 2, 2012 12:14 PM
Edited by: Mehmet Sevinc on Mar 2, 2012 12:29 PM

You have this:
Rate = Account1->Entity->Prior Forecast Year / (Account2->Entity->Prior Forecast Year + Account3->Entity->Prior Forecast Year);I don't have Essbase fired up, but I wonder if this would work:
Rate = @PRIOR(Account1->Entity->&CurFstYr, 1, "Years") / (@PRIOR(Account2->Entity->&CurFstYr, 1, "Years") + @PRIOR(Account3->Entity->&CurFstYr, 1, "Years")) ;You can put a cross dim into a @PRIOR statement, but you will need to specify the dimension unless it's whatever is tagged as Time. My guess is Years is not the Time dimension.
I'll bet the @PRIOR doesn't make things fast.
Regards,
Cameron Lackpour
Edited by: CL on Mar 2, 2012 6:26 PM
Forgot the first @PRIOR

Cross tab formula help

Post Author: ivanl
CA Forum: Formula
Hi,
Using XI and win XP.
I have been using excel to get the info I need, but thought it must be possible to do it right in the cross tab. I need two different cross tabs, and do not know how to do the following.
The fields I have in the dataset include:
- product.type (different products and one field "product.type = 'customer' that is the customers)
- product.balance (balance of each product for each customer)
- formula for age segmentation
What I need to input into the cross tab is to have the segmentation across the top, products for the rows and as the summary:
1) penetration rate (i.e. count of product types divided by # of customers which is product.type = customer)
2) $ per customer (product balance divided by customers)
3) $ per product (product balance divided by # of products)
Help would be awesome. I have no idea how to do this in Crystal
To date, I have set up a cross tab with segment across top, products down the rows, and as a summary using count products and sum of balances. I would input this into excel and do the calculations.
Ivan

Hi, this may help,
http://www.chelseatech.co.nz/pubs.htm
Look down on the right side, you should see
Sample Report Files
Sales Calendar
Calendar Report
Running Totals in a Crosstab
Wrapping Crosstab
PDF Drill Down
Crosstab calculations
Hierarchical Summary in a formula
You can download an example of Crosstab Calulations from this site.
They have some newsletters that also contain CR hints.

Best Practice when Formulating Parents

Hi all,
If we want for example the mean of the children at a parent level member instead of the default aggregation or cross-dimensional formulas (a different calculation on the parent of one dimension for each combination with members from another dimension), what can we do?
1) Should we formulate that as dimension formula? Actually, can we formulate a parent?
2) Has anybody tried to change the aggregation settings directly in the MSAS cube?
3) Is there any way at all to formulate a parent with script logic? (all I can think of is to create a leaf member representing the parent and formulating that member).
Kind Regards,
Rafael

Hi Rafael,
Interesting question you ask. In one recent project, my customer needed both a mean (excluding the zero values), and other statistical functions -- a 90th percentile, 95th percentile, % of customers served within 30 minutes / 1 hour of entering the office, % of customers who get an appointment within 1 week of date they called, etc.
And they needed to compute these for each month (based on that month's population of data), as well as for the calendar quarter, half-year, and year (based on the population of data for each of those time periods). They also needing rolling quarterly and half-year totals, updated each month.
In this case, I created the standard time dimension as per apshell, with 12 months, knowing that the standard aggregation would give invalid results. I needed to store the quarter-total, half-year-total, and year-total values somewhere in a base member, so by convention I always stored them in the final month of the period in question. E.g., the half-year average for Jan-Jun is stored in Jun, the 12-month rolling average for August to July goes in July, etc.
I then used a separate user-defined dimension TimeMeasure to store the different values
- Monthly
- Quarterly
- HalfYearly
- Yearly
Be careful what you name these members -- you don't want to use reserved words that will cause problems (I would avoid "MONTH" "QUARTER" "YEAR").
And then for the calculations of the statistics, I gave up on BPC SQL logic and did it all in a stored procedure. This was far far simpler and more flexible, given the statistics involved. I don't believe it's possible to do those types of calcs in BPC SQL, but even if it is, it wasn't worth the extra time to code, and the run-time performance & logical control in the stored procedure was far superior.
Regards,
Tim

Define company ownership structure

Hello,
How to define company ownership structure in HFM?
Example:
A owns 40% of B
B owns 50% of A
Thank's

Hi,
Company ownership is defined in HFM between a parent entity A and its child B using system account [POWN].
A data file will give something like this :
Scenario; Year; Period; YTD; Entity A; [None]; [POWN]; Entity B; [None]; [None]; [None]; [None]; 40
But, until version 9.3 it don't think it is possible to declare crossed ownership structures. I think this is one of the improvement of version 11 of HFM, you should look at the associated documentation.
Regards,
Lionel.

Cross correlation

hi..
can you please tell me how can i implement this formula in labview?

i m attaching a vi that compares two jpeg images by extracting determinants.
tell me how can the output of these deteminants be used with cross corelation formula?please send me sample vi of it.
Attachments:
matrix.vi ‏60 KB

How to implement Joint Venture accounting in BPC?

Dear Experts,
We have a requirement of configuring Joint venture accounting for our client. Our client has a 50% JV with an entity say ‘X’.
We are getting complete TB of the entity ‘X’ from the client, which we load into the system as LC values at NO_GRP.
We have maintained the below given ownership structure in Ownership manager:
And have defined following Methods and method based multipliers in the system:
Now, while performing consolidation, the requirement is to display just 50% of the values in all the accounts for entity X, as it’s a 50% JV and eliminate the IC transactions appropriately.
Currently, the reports are displaying 100% TB and performing 100% elimination for the IC transactions with entity ‘X’.
We would really appreciate, if you could please guide us on how to achieve the Joint venture accounting in BPC.
Thanks in advance.

Hi
Not sure if you found an answer to this, I just came accross your question while doing something else, but one thing does sprint to mind, did you configure the Cross Ownership data in the Ownership model?
Also, are you sure your share ranges on your methods are right? Do you want to use the proportionate method if you only have 30% ownership, for example? Obviously I cannot comment on your specific situation, but generally Equity method is used for ownership around the 20-50 % mark.

Cannot have functions across tables if table name includes dot (.)

It appears that table names must not include a dot (.) or else functions that take arguments from several tables do not work (e.g., compute the sum of several values form different tables). To be precise, they do work if the functions were inserted using a the previous version of Numbers. New or old but edited functions do not work.
Is anyone else seeing this problem?

As in French or Italien, comma (,) is the decimal separator in German (and the dot separates thousand). The commas do not cause these problems, just dots (.).
However, your mentioning the simple quotes gets us one step further: With French, Italian or German number format these simple quotes are added automatically when characters such as comma or minus sign are part of the table name. They are not added when dots are part of the table name.
When I add the single quotes manually, then the cross-table formula works - once. However, when I edit the formula the single quotes are magically removed, causing the error to occur again.
So far, it seems as if the dot is not taken care of at least with French, German and Italian as the number format. I have not tried any other languages.

Sparse Member rollup

Hello, I am having 9 dimensions in that 3 are dense and 6 are sparse. I am having Date as sparse member and Measure as dense member. My daily data is rolled up to weekly level in essbase calculation. For few members weekly rollup will be rollup of a member divide by rollup of some other members. For eg., 3 measures say X,Y,Z. In this Z=X/Y. So weekly rollup of Z will be weekly rollup of X divide by weekly rollup of Y. But since my Date dimension is in Sparse and Formula is in dense i am not able to achive it.The weekly members are rolled up as it is, and its not as per the formula. Can any one suggest how to achive this? Regards R.Prasanna

If your problem is solved then ignore this.If not : My reply is As what I understood, (It was workingcorrectly before when Time dimension was dense.)Are you calculating any cross-dimensional formula on top ofdense and sparse members which resulting in dense member?If yes, your problem is here.If any formula you calculate on cross-dimensional members ofsparse and dense combination, result must be stored in Sparsemember, or it will not create a data block for this membercombination. Save it in sparse member. This is frequent error whenwe work with Time dimension.Before it was OK, because all were dense, and it had alreadycreated blocks for it.Now, block is not there, and it should create a block, which isnot created because you are saving result in dense measure'smember. Its always best using FIX-ENDFIX for all performanceoptimization and avoiding or reducing this error. Let me know, if this helps.

ESSO - Template matching and the tracing controller

Hi,
I'm configuring eSSO Logon Manager, and have some apps that don't match their templates... unless I'm looking at the process with the Tracing Controller, in which case they work fine. Does anyone know what might be happening?
Edit: I have some applications where the login windows have no title. If I remove support for them in eSSO, the apps that were not matching their templates before now do so normally. Any ideas?
(Note: I configured the applications with no login window title by matching any title for the login window, then making a disabled template for the same executable, which would match any non-empty title. If there is a better way to do it (such as a regular expression that only matches the empty string but is not the empty string itself) I'd love to hear about it.
Thanks,
Juan
Edited by: user7289527 on Oct 17, 2008 9:28 AM

Hello,
actually its normalized cross correlation, not just correlation (the difference is in the denominator - normalized correlation is invariant to uniform intensity changes).
I don't know what more there is to say about "how" Match Pattern 4 works. Did you check the normalized cross-correlation formula? Its simple, you can implement it yourself. It basically just moves the template over the image and calculates the normalized correlation score (maybe this will make it clearer?: http://docs.opencv.org/doc/tutorials/imgproc/histograms/template_matching/template_matching.html ). The normalized cross correlation is not the only metric for matching patterns. The only thing to add is that Labview uses two different algorithms (i think there was only low discrepancy sampling in Pattern match 3):
1. Low discrepancy sampling and
2. Pyramid based matching (which is further divided into grayscale and gradient).
These features are used mainly for computational time purpose. For example, pyramid matching reduces the size of the source image and the template and thus achieving less computational cost. You can read about pyramid based correlation online - there are quite a few papers that deal with it...
Anyway, pattern matching will not work with significant scale changes or occlussions. Use geometric matching to deal with these.
Could you show an image of positive and negatve match?
Best regards,
K
https://decibel.ni.com/content/blogs/kl3m3n
"Kudos: Users may give one another Kudos on the forums for posts that they found particularly helpful or insightful."

Custom formula in cross-tab?

I have a cross-tab like this
                  JAN    FEB    MAR ....... DEC (the 12 months as columns)
year 2006
   item 01     150    205      300 .......    550
   item 02       80    190      284 ........   620
year 2007
   item 01      458    235      224 .......... 781
   item 02      154    254      134.......... 254
year 2008
   item 01       245    154      544           1243
   item 02       524    254      124 .........   924
I want to know if is possible to have a formula that take the value of each month and compare with the previous and make a calcule like this...
                  JAN    FEB    MAR ....... DEC (the 12 months as columns)
year 2006
   item 01     150    205      300 .......    550
   item 02       80    190      284 ........   620
year 2007
   item 01      458    235      224 .......... 781
                   (205)   (14)
   item 02      154    254      134.......... 254
year 2008
   item 01       245    154      544           1243
   item 02       524    254      124 .........   924
where (205) and   (14) are calculate from:
(205) = (150 - 458) * 100 / 150 I have to make this operation for each month takin the values from item 01 from 2006 with the values from item 01 from 2007 and so on
Edited by: j jara on Jul 22, 2008 2:01 AM

Yes it is possible.
It would be easier in CR2008 where you have the ability to add Calculated Members.
In previous versions you would need to create a variable for each year and using the GridRowColumnValue function assign the current value to a variable. You would then need to add a second summary field as a "dummy" summary and in the Display string formula declare the variables and manipulate the values as you like and finally convert the output to string.

Alternative formula for condition base value in cross-application

Hi,
I need inputs regarding an issue as:-
In "TAXINJ" Tax pricing procedure, for a ZXXX excise related condition type the alternate condition base value (Alternative formula for condition base value) must be of YXXX condition type of MM Purchase pricing Procedure.
How to acheive Alternative formula for condition base value in cross-application area as both condition type belongs to different Application area i.e. ZXXX belongs to TX and YXXX belongs to M.
One way or only way is thro' routine but I do not know How it works?
Thanking you.
Prashant

routine is only the best way for u in this case
u will have to use subtot may be 6 or 4 in MM pricing procedure
and write a routien in Tax procedure, i n that u will have to write a code where in ur sustem will featch this value in sub total and act a a base for ur cond type in Tax proc for ue condition type.
what is your excat requirement
there might be other work around that can help u around
hope this works
or write t routines one in MM and Other in Tax proc for ur issues

Bug – CR 2011 cross tab number decimal formula not executing

I have a formula to format the number of decimal points in both the column and row header values in a cross tab subreport. The formula does not appear to execute. If I display the data in a simple table format and use the same decimal formula the format is correct.
cross tab header, decimals not displayed correctly
Data when displayed in a simple table using the same formula, decimals are displayed correctly

Hi Paul,
Here's another way:
Remove the formula you've used under 'Decimal' for the cells in the crosstab.
Right-click one of the cells > Format Field > Common tab > Click the formula button beside 'Display String' and use this code:
numbervar x := CurrentFieldValue;
numbervar ipart;
numbervar decpart;
ipart := int(x) ;
decpart := x - ipart;
if ipart > 0 then
totext(ipart,0)
else if decpart > 0 then
Replace(totext(decpart),"0","")
-Abhilash

SAP Crystal Report - Formula in Cross Tab Report

I have a below requirement in a cross tab report,
Category          Name          Valu1          Value2    %ge
A                       Car               40                  50        80
A                        Bike             30                  60        50
Total                                       70               110     63.6
%ge is a formula field and is calculated as value1/value2 * 100
Consider the Total section as a group footer.
In the cross tab report how do I put the formula field for %ge in Total section.

Vishujain
Crosstabs are very structured and you are limited in what you can do with them. You can do a percentage summary in Crosstabs, but only as a percentage of the row total or the percentage of the column total. You cannot put a formula in the crosstab to do a percentage of a values in seperate rows. Any time I need to perform a function not available in a crosstab, I do a manual cross tab. Look at: [Manual Crosstab Explaination|Re: Formulas : Help for coding]
Debi
Edited by: Debi Herbert on Nov 3, 2011 11:51 AM

Running Totals and Formulas with Cross Tabs

Hi,
I'm using Crystal Reports 2008 and am having two issues using Cross Tabs.
The first is that I want to have two crosstabs. They both will have a common Y axis (Oppourtunity.Sales Rep), and on the Y Axis I want one to show all (Opportunity.Create Date) where (Opportunity.Staus = Won) and the other where (Opportunity.Staus = In Process), but I can't figure out how to contruct the formula to return this result.
The other issue, is that in addition to summarizing based on Sum (Opportunity.Expected Revenue), I would also like to create a running total to show the cumulative (Expected Revenue) Week over Week.
Any direction would be fantastic.
Thank you,
Michael

Please go through the SAP Notes listed here which would help you how to create mannual running totals in crosstab
[https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/advancedsearch?cat=sdn_ossnotes&query=runningtotalin+crosstab&adv=true&note_number=&component=&sdn_updated_on_comparator=GE&sdn_updated_on=&sortby=cm_rnd_rankvalue]
Regards,
Raghavendra

Cross ownership formula

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for