CS6 multicam question

Hi
I am on PPRO CS6.03 on windows 7 and have a question regarding multicam.
I just finished watching the multicam section on the training at lynda.com, but it leaves me with one question though.
I saw how to select the primary angle, and that PPRO would use the audio from that angle to cover the whole edit.
That is ok, but what now if I f.ex. do a concert edit, where I have a separate recording from the soundboard to my audio recorder device, and I want to use this audio for the whole edit?
How do I chose this instead?
Thanks
Ulf

After you create your multicam clip, right click on it and select "Open in Timeline."  This will open a timeline with your stacked video tracks and any audio tracks that are synced up.  Here, you can add in your second source audio and sync it with the video track.  Whatever audio track you have with an active output (The speaker icon is on) will be the one that goes with your multicam edit.  So, just mute every other audio track except your external audio source and hop back to your multicam edit.  You can also do audio editing here in this timeline - such as applying effects or level adjustments - and that will be refelected in your multicam edit.

Similar Messages

  • CS6 METADATA QUESTIONS

    CS6 METADATA QUESTIONS
    Working with record album saved in a wave format, on a computer running windows 7
    I break the album into individual songs using markers  which I name the title of each song, I check the include metadata box when I export each marker to  individual file. In the ID3 metadata I enter the artist , album name, recording date, and genre. In the xmp under riff I enter the album name under product. Before I save each marker to a separate file.
    The information that shows up in windows explorer is the file name, album name, and contributing artists. Unless you enter a space after the information entered in the metadata columns, such as album name, windows cuts off the last letter. Is this a windows problem or a CS6 problem?
    Is there somewhere in the metadata that you can enter the track no. so it will show up in windows explorer track no. column?
    3.Is there  anyway to have the marker names entered into the id3 title column and the xmp/rff name columns.?
    After the markers have been saved as individual files , windows explorer has the file name, album name ,and artist. I then open each individual song file  and copy the file name into the ID3 title column and the xmp/rff name column, add the track no. in the id3 track no column ,and hit file save . At this point windows explorer no longer shows any information but the file name. In order to get the title, album name, and artist to show up in windows  I have to hit file “save as” and then save it again as the same file name. Why? Am I doing something wrong?
    After I get the information in the metadata of the individual songs saved in a wave format. I then save a copy in the mp3 format . Even though the id3 information is in the meta data of the songs saved in a wave format when I save a copy in the mp3 format the information is no longer available, Why? Is there a way to convert a wave file with id3 information  to an mp3 without having to re enter it all again?
    Is there another low loss format that would handle the metadata  better and allow it to show up when converted to mp3? 
    Is there a more detailed help article on metadata standards?

    I've been doing some workflow rehearsals with Pl and Pr (Still more to try out) and I have shifted my thinking a bit on how to use these two programs together in the most useful way. 
    I have started thinking of Prelude as the "Turbocharged" version of Premiere's Project window, bins, browser and metadata panel.  If you start to think of Pl as a break-out companion, and use the two in conjunction, I think it can make for a very powerful combo.
    I know that it has been suggested to only flow in one direction - use Pl first and then switch over to Pr, but since Pl's capabilities for marking, adding and searching for metadata is stronger, i have been going back and forth a lot.
    In your example above, you can mark your comment (marker) sections in Pl and send over the clips you are interested in.  If you find you need more clips or a different "Answer1", pop back to Pl and do a search, find the clip, and send over to Pr.  It's like going back to the well for more media only when you need it. The search is much better over at Pl (in my opinion)  
    There are still a lot of new features I would add to Pl to make it more robust, but for now it is working well as my Clip org and Search in place of the meager abilities in Pr.

  • PREMIERE CS6 multicam view has a glitch!!!

    It seems PREMIERE CS6 multicam view has a glitch!!! It wont let you manully (not while in playing mode) scroll through frame by frame and switch from camera to camera and update your nested timeline with edit cuts!! It will only make edit cuts while the play button is engaged! Which means you have to be perfect with your cuts while the footage plays back! Can someone fix this please?!!

    Kevin Monahan wrote:
    Under "Adjust multi-camera edits in a Timeline panel," your bullet says, "Place the current-time indicator at the place in a Timeline where you want to replace a clip from one camera with a clip from another. In the Multi-Camera Monitor, select the replacing camera preview."  No one would possibly read the word "select" and assume that means pressing the Ctrl-key combination.
    BTW, you can replace the shot by just selecting the camera preview. Select, does mean "clicking on" in this context. I moved this sentence to "Switch to a camera angle," to avoid confusion. "Adjust multi-camera edits in a Timeline panel," contains information only when manipulating clips in the Timeline, not the Multi-Camera Monitor (combined with the Timeline). I adjusted that text, as well.
    I hope this page is clearer for all: http://helpx.adobe.com/content/help/en/premiere-pro/using/editing-mult i-camera-sequences1.html
    Thanks, Kevin; the new section called "Cut to a camera angle" is basically the clarifying information that we needed, expanding everyone's understanding of the new Ctrl-key combination requirement to include not only the numbered keystrokes, but also clicking on the source in the Multi-Camera Monitor (when working from the Timeline, for example).
    However, the section entitled "Change a camera angle" that immediately precedes it is not only redundant, but inaccurate, as it continues to leave out the Ctrl-key combination requirement when clicking on the new camera angle to effectuate an edit (and the sub-note about recording doesn't help).
    I really think you should literally try these things out, following your own draft instructions, before posting them.  You'll see...

  • Premiere pro cs6 multicam editing

    hI all!
    How can I do a Premiere Pro cs6 multicam editing when there is a "audio only" clip too? for exemple when there is an external service audio recording?
    Selecting the clips and right clic the create source multi-camera menù command is deactivated, and this option is not available; why doesn't it work?
    thank you all.
    Luigi

    You can always do things the original (and often better) way.
    Manually.

  • Photoshop images with spot channels in Indesign CS6 (layout question)

    I've got an Indesign CS6 layout that will have a spot varnish when it goes to press. Right now I've got a layout with psd files that have spot channels in them that will be used for the spot varnish.
    My question is, in Indesign when I'm laying this out should I have one layer with all the psd artwork (with no spot channels) and then a layer on top of that with the psd files with the psd layers turned off with the spot channel showing? I want to make this easy to print in the office so by doing it this way I could just turn the spot layer off and print.
    Will this work for the printer?
    layer 1 psd files with no spot channels
    layer 2 psd files with photoshop layers turned off with the spot channel showing

    Besides the obvious extra work of tracking 2 images, there would be potential problems if the images needs to be scaled and moved, and you would have to assume people downstream would know what's going on—should the layer be on or off?
    I would double check with the current printer—they should know the only way to view a spot is via Sep or Output preview by turning CMYK off—magenta could just as easily be process as  spot.
    Take a closer look at the Alias method. Here it is with your magenta defined SPOT VARNISH.
    With SPOT VARNISH set as No Alias in Ink Manager and with Overprint turned on:
    And with an additional spot color defined as white named CLEAR VARNISH. When you need to print in house alias SPOT VARNISH to CLEAR VARNISH and check Simulate Overprint in the Print dialog. You can get to Ink Manger via the Print>Output dialog or Swatches panel:
    All you have to do is delete the CLEAR VARNISH before sending the job to the printer or exporting

  • Another CS6 build questions thread

    Hi guys,
    My first post here, I've been reading lots on here today thanks for all the info!, I'm building a new edit of, mainly for pp & ae cs6. I think I'm there with components but would love to hear your opinions and experiences before I click the pay now button in case I've missed something or there's something better about to be released...ideally I'd like to order this in the next couple of days as I have an intense project next week but I could do it on current pc it will just be more painful!
    So, I mainly edit using hdv or xdcam ex, lots of video layers & effects especially magic bullet etc...and my current setup doesn't even come close to cutting the proverbial mustard...
    Am looking at following bits, but 1 question, a few years ago I had a dual Xeon system with a Canopus dvstorm card on I think premiere pro 1.5, and it was blazing fast lovely real time effects but more noticeable for me was the output render times, I've read a lot over the past three days and it seems that cs6 only uses the processor for output rendering, is this the case? Or am I missing something!?
    So (based on videoguys DIY 9 and extensive research online)
    Asus p9x79 pro (please advise if the ws is any better? It seems not and I have a pci FireWire card anyway...)
    Intel core i7 3930k (c2) (can anyone tell me what the "rev2" difference is?
    Evga classified gtx680 4gb (I read...and read...and read....and read...and decided on this over the quadro 4000 please advise!!!???)
    64gb (8x8gb) ripjaws 1600mhz 12800 (I've decided to take a punt on these as I've read on here that Samsung lv (1.3??) is more stable...this is the part I'm least confident on so please please feel free to suggest what memory!?) I've gone 64gb as I understand after effect can use it?
    256gb Sandisk extreme sata3 ssd (boot)
    2 1tb caviar black (striped) (are the velociraptors worth it!?)
    2 2tb caviar green (pre backup "dump" drive & music/sound effects etc
    Fractal designs r4 titanium
    I'm hoping that will speed things along a bit?
    My main questions are...
    Edit hardware my old Canopus DVD storm, and to a lesser degree my multibridge (now gone) add something, but on this setup there's no 'edit card' if that makes sense? Am I missing something (apart from an I/o device for capture p/tape export ((FireWire??)) any 'high end' work I do is on xdcam so no capture necessary?
    Memory...what's the official line? Will the ripjaws work?
    Gpu... Are the quadro cards better!? Or do they assume 'professionals' are less likely to over clock there cards and so offer longer warranty ;-)?
    Any other criticisms/ recommendations?
    Thanks

    Quick update...Ive just ordered the parts hopefully arrive tomorrow and I can put everything together!
    Thanks so much to everyone who contributes on this forum, I havent replied to all, but I have read SO many posts on here this week!
    Have I missed anything (Apart from a hardware raid controller and 10 velociraptors!!!)
    I may treat myself to a new Keyboard and mouse, I have a R.A.T 9 at the moment which I absolutley love! but get fed up with swapping batteries and so considering getting the "7" either that or the logitech mx revolution... any other recomendations?
    Also was about to order one of these...
    http://www.editorskeys.com/video-editing-keyboards/adobe-premiere-dedicated-keyboard.html
    And will keep my shuttle xpress wheel which I never use...but am planning on trying out with this new system...
    So...pretty much as above I ended up ordering the following
    Item: Samsung S24b300hl LED LCD Widescreen 23.6" HDMI Monitor
    Qty: 1 Cost: £100.11 (To complement my existing 2)
    Item: Asus P9X79 PRO Socket 2011 8 Channel Audio ATX Motherboard
    Qty: 1 Cost: £159.43
    Item: Intel Core i7 3930K 3.20GHz Socket 2011 12MB Cache Retail Boxed Processor
    Qty: 1 Cost: £398.32
    Item: EVGA GTX 680 Classified Edition 4096MB GDDR5 Dual DVI HDMI DisplayPort PCI-E Graphics Card with FREE ASSASSINS CREED III Download Coupon
    Qty: 1 Cost: £400.82
    Item: Assassins Creed III Nvidia Download Coupon (shame I have so much work to do this isnt going to get used!)
    Qty: 1 Cost: £0.00
    Item: SanDisk 240GB Extreme SSD - 2.5" SATA-III - Read 550MB/s Write 520MB/s
    Qty: 2 Cost: £116.66
    Item: Corsair 850W HX 80PLUS Gold Modular PSU
    Qty: 1 Cost: £109.99
    Item: WD 1TB 3.5" SATA-III 6Gb/s Caviar Black Hard Drive - 7200rpm 64MB Cache
    Qty: 2 Cost: £65.83
    Item: Fractal Design Define R4 Titanium Case
    Qty: 1 Cost: £81.66
    Item: Noctua NH-D14-2011 Dual Radiator Cooler with PWM fans LGA2011 only
    Qty: 1 Cost: £50.33
    Item: G-Skill 16GB (4x4GB) DDR3 1600MHz RipjawsZ X79 Memory Kit CL9 1.5V
    Qty: 2 Cost: £52.24
    PLEASE say now if Ive missed something, or if there is a conflict/incombatibility problem with any of this kit!
    Im excited...and now broke...
    In short...
    Looking at keyboard & mouse recomendations?
    Does anyone notice anything wrong with the list? Please let me know now before I open anything tomorrow!
    Will I need a mini hdmi to regular hdmi adapter?

  • CS6 Multicam Edit - Is there a way to turn off some camera angles when the system gets strained?

    I'm doing a multicam edit in cs6 and the 5 camera angles I have are straining my system.  I have two main angles and three kind of back up go pro angles that I don't need most of the time.  But I don't want to get rid of them either.  Is there a way to turn off monitoring some of the angles at times so that video will playback smoother?  Then when I need the other angles, switch them back on when I want?  The video is so choppy with all 5 angles monitoring at once that multicam editing is basically impossible.  I'm editing on what's supposed to be a very fast system at work but it's not fast enough...Thanks!

    I'm not aware of any way to do this. You might want to invest in a battery case if this is a problem for you; our users here all have them.
    Please submit your feature request to Apple at this link: http://www.apple.com/feedback; I agree it's a good idea.

  • Best Practices CS6 - Multicam Edit: How to use a key?

    I'm trying to figure out what's the best way to use the Multi-cam editing function of CS6 PP, while applying a key to the primary video track.
    The workflow I have is V1 contains the background that I want to key into V2. I applied UltraKey to V2, did the key (works great), and now I want to use the multicam editing to cut between the finished keyed V2 track, and video on V3. The way I've always used the Multicam editing in the past is to select the video clips from the clip browser (not the timeline) to create a multicam source sequence - but if I have to apply a key first, I can't do that. I thought of nesting V1 and V2 together after the key is applied, but then I can't make adjustments to the key after the final composite is made (or can I?)
    Any thoughts about what works best in this scenario? appreciate the help.

    I don't think my system could support live keying. I'd prefer to apply the key first but this is where I had a problem. Let's assume for a minute that there's no key. In a typical MCS workflow, I'd just select the clips from the browser, create the MCS, do the live cuts and be done with it. If I can still do that it's fine, but would that screw everything up in the MCS if I move all the video up one track because the background for the key has to be in front of the video that it's being applied to? I hope I'm making sense here.

  • Photoshop CS6 nooby questions/how do i?

    I have alot of quesstions and dont really see alot of clear forum posts on what im looking for. so ill make this discussion thread in hopes of getting responses here. Also if someone knows a better forum somewhere for topics or discussion like i ask here PLEASE direct me im open to looking other places.
    For starters. I would liek to know if there is a way to get a more realistic oil painting look using brushes or a extension or combination in PS CS6. The filter is rubbish imo doesnt look liek oilpainting at all really. Looks more like a colorized embossing tool. I did find a program Autodesk Sketchbook 6 which has a more paint like look and sets of brushes to accompany. But alas its not got the precision and options that PS has. So if anyone knows how i can achieve this type of effect whiel just painting with a tool id appreciate a link to or explanation on how I have seen 'prfessionals' in videos doing the exact thigns im asking about. Yet they could have been using a custom built extension of some sort and assuredly running a older version of the program as it ahs been awhiel since i seen it. So hope its out there and someone directs me to it lol.

    Simplify is my third most used Topaz product after Adjust and DeNoise, but I probably use the other two 100 times for every use of Simplify, and never to produce an oil paint look.  So I just had a play, and it works pretty well with lots of presets, an plenty of sliders to fine tune.  It doesn't produce brush strokes though, so Photoshop's Oil Paint filter is a useful tool to use after Simplify.
    Last I looked you can get a 30 day fully function trial of the Topaz products, and they are realistically priced.
    But I suspect some of the examples you have been looking at did not use Photoshop at all, but Corel Painter.  Check out some of these links
    Dys DeVictor wrote:
    I have alot of quesstions and dont really see alot of clear forum posts on what im looking for. so ill make this discussion thread in hopes of getting responses here. Also if someone knows a better forum somewhere for topics or discussion like i ask here PLEASE direct me im open to looking other places.
    Please don't be fooled by all the Installation, driver, and high dpi posts you see in this forum.  I think most of the regulars here HATE them, but answer them while waiting for interesting questions about how to do stuff with Photoshop.  In fact this forum had a much higher percentage of interesting questions befor the CC Photography bundle deal was released, which attracted swarms of new users with little experience, and sometimes inadequate systems.  It is rude not to answer them, but it is not always a rewarding experience with people sometimes thinking we are paid Adobe staff who they can vent at.
    So if you have interesting questions, please ask them.

  • CS6 installation question

    I'm sure the answer will be simple to some but I still have the question. I've checked FAQ, and a Google search just leads to Torrent sites...
    I've installed a downloaded package of ID CS6 to a Win 7, 64 bit, PC and all appears to be fine. The install package had 3 files and instructions (which don't cover my query).
    InDesign_8_LS16.exe launches the installer and unpacks all the required files from InDesign_8_LS16.7z - so far so good. What about the other file, InDesignFamily_8_Content_ALL.exe ?
    What does it contain? Do I have to run it or has the installer already done so? Thanks for any enlightenment on offer.
    David

    For the benefit of anyone searching for this answer, I found only a collection of fonts which was useful in itself. This is available in 23 different language folders. Definitely useful rather than essential and, this was my worry, it doesn't install anything - just unpacks the file onto the desktop.

  • CS6 "upgrade" question

    I currently have CS5. I'm planning on getting the CS6 upgrade. I'm also planning on getting a new computer. My question is, do I have to install CS5 onto my new computer in order to install the CS6 upgrade version?
    Thanks for advice.

    No, you do not have to install CS5 on the new computer.  When you install CS6 it will merely ask you for your qualifying (CS5) serial number.  Keep in mind that you can't sell or give away the CS5 to anyone else if it is being used for the upgrade path.

  • CS6 General Question

    hey guys -
    I have a pretty general question, that I hope is a simple answer.  Will the (javascript) scripts that work in CS5 still work perfectly in CS6 if we upgrade?  We have become quite dependant on our scripts, and we're trying to decide if the upgrade is worth it.  So much about Photoshop and Illustrator was broken in CS5 and never addressed, so now I get pretty nervous about upgrading for fear of being less productive.  Any thoughts/comments about existing scripts moving into CS6?

    Your only real way is test for your self… In principle it should work but I've heard that a couple of times before. You will still have CS5?

  • Canon T3i metadata in PS CS6 ex question

    Canon T3i metadata question:
    In Photoshop CS3 the metadata of each photo displays the time to the second the picture was taken. But in Photoshop CS6 EX ( creative cloud ) the data only shows the minute the picture was taken. I need the timing down to the second.  Is there a setting for this?
    Thanks.
    Thomas

    Curt and all, thanks for the reply.
    Well, the exif info is only down to the minute.
    For further info, when I open the exif menu window in PS CS6 ex the menu box says "powered by xmp(trademark)". I am wondering if Photoshop has eliminated the second span information?
    I don't know where to ask my questions. Maybe there is a better forum?
    Thanks again.

  • CS6 Multicam "Rendering Required Files"

    Did a quick search for "rendering required files" and came up with a number of threads from early-mid 2011 regarding CS5 and 5.5 difficulty with PrPro stopping to render audio files when doing multicam edits. I never experienced that until CS6, and now it's happening frequently on a rather basic multicam edit (one HDV, one XDCam-EX, and one AVCHD, with an extra audio track).
    From what I've seen in previous threads, there never was a clear solution to the issue. Anybody shed any more light on it, now a year later with a new version of the software?
    Would I be better off to do a mix down of my four audio tracks before doing the multicam, and then nest that on track one and get rid of my other three original tracks?
    I'm running an i7-920 OC to 2.8GHz on an Asus P6T6 WS Revo with 24 GB of memory, an SSD OS/Programs, a three-disk RAID-5 Project files, a four-disk RAID-5 Data files, and a standalone 6GB/s SATA for scratch and previews, with a GTX-580 for two monitors and CUDA and a GTX-285 for preview/multicam monitor.

    This took me forever to figure out, but I think I have your answer.  When you play back multicam in premiere, it tries to mix all of the audio from your original sequence.  Even though all you hear is the audio from track 1 (at least this was the behavior in previous versions). 
    My fix for this was to delete all all of the audio clips (besides track 1) in the original nested sequence.  Since I use external audio, I just use the camera audio for syncing purposes anyway.  But that's pretty much what you'll want to do.  Mix down whatever audio you plan on actually using for your project and put that in the sequence with your multicam clip.  Or if you prefer, put it on track 1 of your nested sequence. 
    Also, you'll want to unlink the audio and video from your multicam clip, and delete any cuts you've made to the audio.  For some reason, edits to the audio clip also cause the "rendering required files" error.  So just delete all of the many audio "clips" you've made throughout the process of editiing your video, saving just one to drag out to the end of your video.  This way you'll only have one long audio clip spanning the entire length of your video.  Bam.  No more rendering required files.

  • Cs6 crop question , not classic

    Hi
    i have a question about photoshop cs6 crop tool not classic
    i really  like the not classic crop tool
    but i have a problem
    the classic crop tool if i drag it to left photoshop moves the crop to the left , and if i drag to the right it moves to the right
    but in the new version if i drag it to the left  it moves to the right
    ok ,it's just like lightroom
    i tried to get used to the new behavior with no luck
    is there a way , edit the registry or other way to change this behavior?
    i mean i really love the new crop feature , i would love to use it and drag the crop to left and see photoshop moves to the left just like every other version of photoshop
    thanks
    best regards

    mantralightroom wrote:
     …but i have a problem  
    the classic crop tool if i drag it to left photoshop moves the crop to the left , and if i drag to the right it moves to the right
    but in the new version if i drag it to the left  it moves to the right
    If I understand what you're saying, what is confusing to you is that when you drag, you are moving the image itself underneath the selection, as opposed to moving the selection over the image.  Drag to the left and you're moving the image to the left under the selection, so the selection remains stationary in its position relating to the window, but the selection is now positioned to the right of its original position relative to the image.
    That's just the new behavior. 
    However, if instead of dragging from the somewhere inside your selection, you drag from one of the handles of the selection, the direction of the stretching of your selection will appear more like what yiu are used to, particularly if you are set to Fit Image on Screen.
    If you play around with that a bit, you'll get the hang of itin no time. 
    mantralightroom wrote:
    …i tried to get used to the new behavior with no luck…
    Aaaaah, that is where your problem lies! 
    You either like the new Crop Tool, or you like the old, Classic mode.  You can't have a little bit of one and another little bit of the other one. 

Maybe you are looking for