Css opacity options
Hi there
I just want to check I have the full list of css opacity options covered and in the best order?
opacity:0.9;
filter:alpha(opacity=90); /* For IE8 and earlier */
-webkit- opacity: 0.90;
-moz- opacity: 0.90;
opacity: 0.90;
-khtml-opacity: 0.9;
Also how would I pump it up to 95%?
Thanks
Daniel Waddon wrote:
could you tell me if there is a way to give mobile brawzers less or more opacity and keep pc's, laptops ect to another?
You can use media queries to target smaller devices. You could probably also use jQuery to look for a specific type of browser (iOS / Android) but media queries are less code heavy and work for all mobile OS.
@media only screen and (max-width: 600px) { /* set this to the size you want the opacity to change. */
.transparent {
opacity: 0.7;
Similar Messages
-
I was looking to make some semi opaque div's and was wondering if this can be done using CSS. An example of what I am looking for can be viewed on my you tube page http://www.youtube.com/helpvid As you will see the area that house my content has a 50% opacity making the background visible. Can this be created in Dreamweaver?
Stay Safe
MarkThere is a CSS property called opacity. However IE doesn't fully support it (it uses it's own proprietary Filter to get a similar effect.) On top of that, using opacity not only effects the element you apply it to, but also everything else within that element! So your text within the div with CSS opacity applied to it will also have the same transparency - which can be bad and effect legibility when it comes to text.
See http://www.w3schools.com/Css/css_image_transparency.asp for more info and how to use it.
Now with the slow development of CSS3 and a more advanced color models and that can be used by certain browsers, one can use RGBA to define colors and alpha transparency. So far I believe this only works for Safari but one can get some pretty neat effects without effecting the opacity of other elements within the parent element using RGBA.
See http://www.css3.info/preview/rgba/ for information on this.
Hope this helps. -
Why does ID create a CSS when option is not selected in export to ePub?
I am using InDesign 6 to create ePub books. I want to use my own CSS so in the Export to ePub options I am leaving the setting "Include Style definitions" unchecked. I then list my CSS under additional CSS. When I create the ePub and then examine the files included I see that there are 2 CSSs, mine and one created by InDesign. Why does InDesign create a CSS when the "Inlcude Sytle definitions" is left unchecked?
Because that is the way that CS6 exported EPUB.
EPUB is a fast moving target and has moved way beyond what CS6 can export. With each update from InDesign CS6 to InDesign CC to InDesign CC 2014, and even to the latest update to CC in October, there have been major changes to how InDesign exports EPUB. It no longer does it that way, and you have much more control over the process in InDesign CC.
Because InDesign CS6 is never going to change, it's best to work at modifying what they do export, unless you want to upgrade to InDesign CC. -
I'm curious if any experts out there have had any experience
with this. I have tried using the following in my CSS document:
opacity:.4; //For Everything Else
filter:alpha(opacity=40); //I thought this would do the trick
for IE
And despite that code only Safari, Firefox and every other
browser will display the opacity, but not IE 7. I could care less
about IE 6 because the site I have doesn't get enough hits from IE6
for it to be a concern. And this problem also appears to happen in
IE 8, but I assume there is something in common with the two IEs
that are causing this issue.
If anyone has any ideas that would be great because I am
pretty much out of them with this issue:
http://www.exitplaystation.com/ps3/warhawk/index.php
- This is the site. Even the Spry widgets have the same issue, but
the menu is the most obvious.
http://www.exitplaystation.com/ps3/warhawk/css/exitps_warhawk.css
- This is the CSS document. #menu_bg is the menu container that
expands the width of the screen and is the source of the main
issue."SnakEyez02" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
news:ga1fvf$pvv$[email protected]..
> I'm curious if any experts out there have had any
experience with this. I
> have
> tried using the following in my CSS document:
>
> opacity:.4; //For Everything Else
> filter:alpha(opacity=40); //I thought this would do the
trick for IE
>
> And despite that code only Safari, Firefox and every
other browser will
> display the opacity, but not IE 7. I could care less
about IE 6 because
> the
> site I have doesn't get enough hits from IE6 for it to
be a concern. And
> this
> problem also appears to happen in IE 8, but I assume
there is something in
> common with the two IEs that are causing this issue.
>
> If anyone has any ideas that would be great because I am
pretty much out
> of
> them with this issue:
>
>
http://www.exitplaystation.com/ps3/warhawk/index.php
- This is the site.
> Even
> the Spry widgets have the same issue, but the menu is
the most obvious.
>
>
http://www.exitplaystation.com/ps3/warhawk/css/exitps_warhawk.css
- This
> is
> the CSS document. #menu_bg is the menu container that
expands the width
> of the
> screen and is the source of the main issue.
For the filter to work in IE, you need to give the element a
layout (Google
"Ingo Chao hasLayout" for the best article on this).
So try this:
#menu_bg {width:100%;}
If for any reason this creates an issue with the layout and
you don't care
about CSS validation then go with a simple:
#menu_bg {zoom:1;}
Thierry
Articles and Tutorials:
http://www.TJKDesign.com/go/?0
http://developer.yahoo.com/
helps you build applications and mashups -
CSS opacity statements seem to strip PNG opacity values. Any way to circumvent?
I noticed it's apparently impossible to make a PNG (with
various levels of
opacity) semi-transparent via the usual channels, listed
below :
filter: progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.Alpha(opacity=75);
opacity: 0.75;
-moz-opacity: 0.75;
This trio of CSS statements did a pretty good job of covering
all the usual
bases when it came to making an image partially transparent.
However, as
mentioned above, it seems to force all of the pixels in the
PNG to be
exactly *that* transparent (in this case, 75%).
So if your PNG is a gradient that goes from 100% opaque to 0%
gracefully,
applying the above statements to it will cause it to appear
to become
opaque, as the alpha information is stripped and replaced
with "75%" across
the board.
My question is... is there a way for me to make a PNG image
-- one which has
various levels of opacity in it (like a gradient going from
opaque to
transparent) -- semi-transparent while retaining the
proportionate
individual alpha levels of each pixel?
In other words, if I want the PNG to be 75% opaque when shown
in a specific
situation (like a button that will become 100% opaque on
hover/mouseover),
while the more opaque pixels of the PNG remain more opaque
than the more
transparent ones.
Is this at all do-able?"Michael Fesser" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> .oO(Mike)
>
>>Good idea, although that would double the number of
images.
>
> Not necessarily. You can keep multiple images in the
same file and use
> different CSS background positions to show them. Ian
already suggested
> it, here are actual examples of that technique:
>
>
http://wellstyled.com/css-nopreload-rollovers.html
>
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/sprites/
>
> Micha
Granted, but the amount of data being transfered is the same
as if I'd
doubled the number of images.
All I'm looking to do, really, is have a PNG with a slight
shadow effect
(thus, various levels of opacity in the same image) display
in a 90% opaque
natural state, then switch to 100% opaque on mouseover.
For example :
a {
filter:alpha(opacity=90);
-moz-opacity:0.9;
-khtml-opacity: 0.9;
opacity: 0.9;
a:hover {
filter:alpha(opacity=100);
-moz-opacity:1;
-khtml-opacity: 1;
opacity: 1;
90% is just subtle enough to not make the image pale, but
stil give you a
"light up" effect on mouseover.
In Firefox, no problem. CSS's 90% opacity attribute will make
each pixel in
the PNG *proportionately* more transparent (by 10%). In other
words, opaque
pixels become a bit transparent, while already-transparent
pixels become
even MORE transparent. So to the viewer, the entire image
simply became a
bit more transparent.
But in IE -- even IE7 -- the behavior is completely
different. IE will set
ALL the pixels in the PNG (regardless of how transparent or
opaque they are)
to the value set by the attribute. In this case, all pixels
become exactly
90% opaque, equally, across the board, as if the PNG was a
flat opaque
document to begin with (which it wasn't... it had various
levels of opacity
within the same image).
This means that you can't use PNG to do a traditional a:hover
opacity
effect, unless the PNG had no transparency in it to begin
with (in which
case you'd probably use JPG instead).
I've scoured the web for a possible hack around this
limitation, but not
only did I not find one, I didn't find a single mention of
this behavior in
*any* of the PNG transparency primers, tutorials and blogs
that I've found.
If I could at least find someone who so much as NOTICED this
problem before,
I'd feel a little less crazy. :-) -
I am watching a tutorial on wordpress and dreamweaver. In the tutorial, the instructor starts CSS Designer by going to "window" menu item. The option is there. When I go to it, the option is NOT there. What gives??@
The CSS Designer panel is a fairly new addition to DW. The version of DW you are using is older than the tutorial video by at least one version.
There were quite a few changes between these versions...
DWCS6 Perpetual (disk/one-time download)
DWCS6 Cloud (subscription)
DWCC (first one with the CSS Designer panel)
DWCC 2014
You really should make sure any tutorial you use matches your exact version of the program. Even if it does, updates to the cloud versions may make that information outdated in short order. -
CSS opacity: background opaque, but content not..help
Dear all,
It's been a while but I have something I just can't figure out .. what I'm after...I want the background of the main container to be 60% opaque, but the actual content divs not ... can anybody help me with this
Thanks
#mainWrapper {
width: 850;
padding: 0px;
position: absolute;
top: 300px;
width:850px;
margin:0px;
background-color:#ffffff;
/* for IE */
filter:alpha(opacity=60);
/* CSS3 standard */
opacity:0.6;
#contentWrapper {
width: 480px;
padding-top: 0px;
padding-left: 0px;
font-family: "Trebuchet MS", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
font-size: 13px;
display: block;
margin-left: 210px;
margin-right: 160px;
background-color: #FFF;
/* for IE */
filter:alpha(opacity=100);
/* CSS3 standard */
opacity:1;I think I've got it
but you did remove the opacity statements?
I have now (hadn't before) & working [super!!]
2 questions though...perhaps silly
1.
startColorstr='#88FFFF00', endColorstr='#88FFFF00'
but I don't recognise these colours ie 2 letter too much?!!?? Could you please explain...
2. is this way of doing it browser proof?
thanks -
How can I permanently change the opacity option when cropping an image?
I can save the crop opacity at say 5%, exit Photoshop 13, and setting has persisted (Edit > Preferences > Display & Cursors > Opacity). However, when I crop a second image without exiting PS, the opacity has returned to 75%. I am cropping some very dark scanned slides, and I need the 5% opacity to see the slide corners and edges.
See if resetting the pse 13 editor preferences makes any difference.
Go to Edit>Preferences>General, click on Reset Preferences on next launch and then restart the pse 13 editor. -
CSS Designer in Depth | Creative Cloud for Web | Adobe TV
Get an in-depth look at the powerful new CSS Designer tools in Dreamweaver CC. Intuitive visual editing tools help you generate clean, web-standard code and quickly apply CSS properties like gradients and box shadows. You can see the effects on your designs immediately, eliminating tedious tweaking and the need to go back and forth to Code view.
http://adobe.ly/ZSeWkrThe new CSS Designer feature in Dreamweaver CC is a very nice addition to the interface’s workflow. However, it’s not best for all workflows, whereby there should still be a non-assisted CSS editor option available, like in CS6, “without” all the new visual designer tools.
In CS6’s CSS properties editor you can quickly glance at the currently selected element’s CSS properties and directly edit the actual property values in a column format making this a very precise and straightforward workflow process.
For me, the ability to quickly edit CSS properties by clicking on respective elements in the design view editor is the biggest advantage and real power for using Dreamweaver over notepad type editors. Without this option (when working in split mode), it requires switching back and forth between different style-sheets and code view.
Though I really like everything else I’ve seen so far, in this latest version, this seemingly small feature restriction will considerably slow down my overall typical workflow process in most cases. So, until a non-assisted CSS properties editor option is available, I’ll continue using CS6. Please, please fix this soon! Hopefully this is only a short-term oversight and resolved in a very near future update. -
Removing warning for "Default CSS file not found."
I am getting this warning in Flash Builder:
"Default CSS file not found."
I can not for the life of me figure out how to get rid of it. Any suggestions?Default css file can be specified as a compiler option (per SWC, I think).
See http://livedocs.adobe.com/flex/3/html/help.html?content=compilers_14.html
For example, flex framework has a default CSS file: C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe Flash Builder 4\sdks\3.5.0\frameworks\projects\framework\default.css
Do you have some library project or a swc with default css file option turned on, but the css file is missing? -
Is this a bug? Resizing content box problems with opacity.
I was wondering if this is a bug? I've been trying to get a box set behind a text box to resize depending on the amount of content that's within a textbox above it. It works fine when the box underneath the text box is set to 100% opacity. However when I adjust the box below to less than 100% opacity the box stops resizing with the text box. My questions are is this a bug or intended and if it is a bug is there a work-around or will it be fixed soon?
Hello,
Thank you for bringing this up. We were able to reproduce the issue and it has been logged as a Bug.
It seems to be an issue when opacity is reduced from the toolbar at the top.
However, as a workaround, I would like to suggest you to use the opacity option under the Fill Panel.
For this you need to select the rectangle in the background and then click on Fill Panel which comes up on the right hand side. And you can change the value of opacity from there.
Please have a look at the screenshot below which might help :
When the value of opacity is changed from this Fill Panel, the property of rectangle to resize with text is kept.
We have logged a bug for the issue and hopefully it will be fixed in future releases of Adobe Muse.
Apologies for the inconvenience.
Regards,
Sachin -
How can I use this?? Custom css style.
!http://unisonsoft.iptime.org:8000/sample.jpg!
Please look at this image.( Dashboard -> page option -> section properties -> Custom CSS Style Options (HTML Only) -> Use Custom CSS Style)
I want to use Custom Css Style.
What can I do for this?
Thank you.
Edited by: user626249 on 2009. 7. 28 오후 10:28Thank you Mr.Jhon and everyone.
My client asked me "how can I see the pages on dashboard with many CSS"
Sorry...Actually I can`t use ENGLISH very well...
For example)
Page1 has two tables.
These table`s font-size is 12pt.
page2 has two tables too.
These table`s font-size is also 12pt.
In this case, I only want to change table`s font-size 10pt in page2.
The font is set the file "/OracleBI/oc4j_bi/j2ee/home/applications/analytics/analytics/res/s_oracle10/b_mozilla_4/views.css"
If I change this css file, page1 and page2 has same format of tables.
So I need to change olny one page`s table font-size using Custom Css Style.
This is my best writting...Sorry...;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
Thanks everyone...If you understand me, please help me.^^
Edited by: user626249 on 2009. 7. 29 오전 2:22 -
DW 8 dif from DW MX w/ css & sites: help!
I finally upgraded to Dreamweaver 8 (yes, I've been avoiding
it.: too many projects, no time for learning curve). I've tried
using it a bit and it's already driving me nuts. I feel like an
idiot for writing this posting because these most likely have
simple solutions but I can't figure them out. Here are my dilemmas:
1. in the CSS panel, there no longer seems to be a "no css
style" option. Is it gone or hidden?
2. When I hightlight text that I'd like a css style applied
to, in older versions of DW one simply clicked on the style name in
the CSS panel. Now when I click on the style name, nothing happens.
I have to right-click to 'Apply Style'. Am I doing it wrong? Is
there a new way to apply CSS?
3. in the local Files panel, when I double click on a file to
open it, the site starts to connect to the remote server. Driving
me nuts. Not OK.
4. When the site starts to connect to the remote server, it
gives me this message:
"this site has been set up for use by Macromedia Contibute
users. Do you want Dreamweaver to enable all required site settings
for compatibiltiy with Contribute sites?".
(A) This site has not been set up for use by Contribute YET
(other sites have, I guess, but pre-DW 8), and (B) I already said
"yes" once. I said "no" another time. I'm afraid to deselect "don't
show this message again" because I don't know what's happening when
I click yes or no. I don't really understadn what this means!
5. And finally, files now take FOREVER to upload! NOT OK.
This is the worst offender... Any suggestions?
Thank you generously in advance for any insight into my
frustrations. I'm back to using DW MX for now.> 1. in the CSS panel, there no longer seems to be a "no
css style" option.
> Is
> it gone or hidden?
It's moved to the right-click context menu for the
QuickTagSelector.
> 2. When I hightlight text that I'd like a css style
applied to, in older
> versions of DW one simply clicked on the style name in
the CSS panel. Now
> when
> I click on the style name, nothing happens. I have to
right-click to
> 'Apply
> Style'. Am I doing it wrong? Is there a new way to apply
CSS?
Select the text, and use the Style selector on the Property
inspector to
apply your class.
> 3. in the local Files panel, when I double click on a
file to open it, the
> site starts to connect to the remote server. Driving me
nuts. Not OK.
This means that you have enabled Contribute for this site.
Have you?
> 4. When the site starts to connect to the remote server,
it gives me this
> message:
> "this site has been set up for use by Macromedia
Contibute users. Do you
> want
> Dreamweaver to enable all required site settings for
compatibiltiy with
> Contribute sites?".
Ahh - I see. If you are not going to use Contribute for this
site, then
don't enable it in the site's definition. But if you do
enable Contribute,
then this is how it works (and always has been), since by
doing that, you
change your entire work paradigm from using the local site as
the 'gold
standard' to using the remote site as your 'gold standard'.
To do that, DW
*must* connect to the remote site to check that file out in
order for you to
edit it.
> 5. And finally, files now take FOREVER to upload! NOT
OK. This is the
> worst
> offender... Any suggestions?
This is usually a combination of server/network traffic. For
my sites,
files upload very fast. Have you tried enabling passive FTP?
> I'm back to using DW MX for now.
It would take much more than this to drive me that far back!
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Adobe Community Expert
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com
- Template Triage!
http://www.projectseven.com/go
- DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs,
Tutorials & Resources
http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/
- Macromedia (MM) Technotes
==================
"sweez_pdx" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
news:[email protected]...
>I finally upgraded to Dreamweaver 8 (yes, I've been
avoiding it.: too many
> projects, no time for learning curve). I've tried using
it a bit and it's
> already driving me nuts. I feel like an idiot for
writing this posting
> because
> these most likely have simple solutions but I can't
figure them out. Here
> are
> my dilemmas:
>
> 1. in the CSS panel, there no longer seems to be a "no
css style" option.
> Is
> it gone or hidden?
>
> 2. When I hightlight text that I'd like a css style
applied to, in older
> versions of DW one simply clicked on the style name in
the CSS panel. Now
> when
> I click on the style name, nothing happens. I have to
right-click to
> 'Apply
> Style'. Am I doing it wrong? Is there a new way to apply
CSS?
>
> 3. in the local Files panel, when I double click on a
file to open it, the
> site starts to connect to the remote server. Driving me
nuts. Not OK.
>
> 4. When the site starts to connect to the remote server,
it gives me this
> message:
> "this site has been set up for use by Macromedia
Contibute users. Do you
> want
> Dreamweaver to enable all required site settings for
compatibiltiy with
> Contribute sites?".
> (A) This site has not been set up for use by Contribute
YET (other sites
> have,
> I guess, but pre-DW 8), and (B) I already said "yes"
once. I said "no"
> another
> time. I'm afraid to deselect "don't show this message
again" because I
> don't
> know what's happening when I click yes or no. I don't
really understadn
> what
> this means!
>
> 5. And finally, files now take FOREVER to upload! NOT
OK. This is the
> worst
> offender... Any suggestions?
>
> Thank you generously in advance for any insight into my
frustrations. I'm
> back
> to using DW MX for now.
> -
Found this simple css image gallery. However I'm having trouble adjusting it do my needs. I ideally want to make each small image slightly bigger than currently and have 3 or 4 on each line. Also want to make the enlarged image bigger. The width would need to be around 550px.
<style type="text/css">
* This notice MUST stay intact for legal use.
* This script was created for FREE CSS Menus.
* Visit: www.freecssmenus.co.uk for more CSS.
* Also visit our Free online menu creator.
/* credits: www.freecssmenus.co.uk */
#pg { width:390px;
height:200px;
border:2px dotted #666;
padding:5px;
padding-top:15px;
#pg ul { list-style:none;
padding:0;
margin:0;
width:180px;
position:relative;
float:left;
#pg ul li { display:inline;
width:52px;
height:52px;
float:left;
margin:0 0 8px 8px;
#pg ul li a { display:block;
width:50px;
height:50px;
text-decoration:none;
border:1px solid #000;
#pg ul li a img { display:block;
width:50px;
height:50px;
border:0;
#pg ul li a:hover { white-space:normal;
border-color:#336600;
background-color:#AABB33;
#pg ul li a:hover img { position:absolute;
left:190px;
top:0;
width:auto;
height:110px;
border:1px solid #000;
#pg ul li a span {display:none}
#pg ul li a:hover span { display:block;
position:absolute;
left:5px;
top:130px;
width:350px;
height:auto;
font-size:12px;
color:#999999;
</style>
html
<div id="pg">
<ul>
<li>
<a href="css_rollover_uk_map.php">
<img src="upimage/ukmap345.jpg" alt="Css Rollover Map" />
<span>
<strong>
CSS Map.</strong>
CSS Image swap on rollover/hover. This simple display of CSS shows the versatility of Cascading Style Sheets. Remember this animation is 100% User Accessible.</span>
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="big_css_button.php">
<img src="upimage/bigbutton1390.jpg" alt="Large Css Button" />
<span>
<strong>
CSS Big Button.</strong>
Css buttons can be as large and as extravagant as you like. Using one image you can create simple css buttons like this. This button is still a hyperlink not just an image.</span>
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="menu_opacity.php">
<img src="upimage/003opacity639.jpg" alt="Css Opacity" />
<span>
<strong>
CSS Opacity Menu.</strong>
you can use styles to change the opacity of an image. This creates interesting effects when creating a menu. </span>
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="#">
<img src="upimage/freemusic885.jpg" alt="Free Mp3 Downloads: Unborn Records" />
<span>
<strong>
Unborn Records </strong>
Download free mp3 music for your ipod or mp3 player. Download free music from unsigned artists</span>
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="#">
<img src="upimage/trix363.jpg" alt="Visit Trix the dog at www.catandtwodogs.co.u" />
<span>
<strong>
Cat And Two Dogs </strong>
Visit my three pets at www.catandtwodogs.co.uk . This is a picture of trix, he's a border collie.</span>
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="#">
<img src="upimage/colours238.jpg" alt="A picture of colours in a swirl" />
<span>
<strong>
A swirl of colours. </strong>
This is just a picture of colours in a swirl effect.</span>
</a>
</li>
</ul>
</div>Sorry can't do this at the moment.
I've decided to switch to the JQuery Lightbox Image Gallery instead. In IE8 I get the following message:
Message: Script error
Line: 0
Char: 0
Code: 0
URI: file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/User/My%20Documents/SRC12-13/all%20html%205/all%20ht ml%205/Simple-HTML-5-Template/Simple%20HTML%205%20Template/js/jquery.lightbox-0.5.min.js
My page works and my js is refenced correctly. Not sure if this is just a IE8 thing, or whether the page needs uploading to work correctly. Works fine in Chrome.
Wonder if there is a way to fix this? -
Full screen square or slide show opacity?
I have a problem regarding a full screen website and would like to know how to do one of the possible solutions:
1) Is is possible to set opacity on a Full Screen slideshow? That way the images are faded in the background?
2) Another option would be being able to create a fullscreen square on a layer above of the Full Screen slideshow and set the opacity on the square. Is it possible to set a square to be 100% full screen?
Please helpHi,
Here is the solution to your issues :-
1) Yes, you can set the opacity of the images on a Full Screen Slideshow using the opacity option available in the control panel of Muse. Here is the screenshot :- http://prntscr.com/4nxxns
2)Now if you want to control the way the images are faded out in your slideshow and control that change in opacity and transition. You can do that using the Slideshow options of " Transition" and "Transition Speed" . Set the Transition to "Fade" and control the transition speed(Change in opacity during transition) according to your wish. Please refer to this screenshot :- http://prntscr.com/4nxy3p
3) Not you can create a square and place it above the Fullscreen Slideshow as well as control its Opacity using the opacity option. However as of now Muse does not offer this feature to create fullscreen objects, what you do is use the 100% width option and that will cover the entire width if the browser. Please refer to this screenshot :- http://prntscr.com/4nxz58
Also, I would request you to post this "Fullscreen Objects" feature request of yours at Ideas for features in Adobe Muse
I hope this helps
Regards,
Rohit Nair
Maybe you are looking for
-
Scroll Wheel no longer works in version 4.4 RC
My scroll wheel no longer works after installing Lightroom 4.4. In all previous versions, I was able to use my Logitech scroll device to adjust the sliders in the development panel. In the 4.4 version, the scroll wheel no longer works and instead of
-
Hi, Anybody help me regarding following issue where to assign rounding off for excise duty (BED,Ecess,HEcess) Regards, vivek
-
How long do lenovo laptops last?
Hello, I was reading some articles about the lifespan of laptops these days and it said that in general, laptops last 2-3 years only. I was quite upset by this, since I paid a great deal of money for my W700. I don't care if my laptop gets outdated,
-
Launch outside applicatio​n
I am trying to create a button to launch an outside application. I am trying to run a Flash presentation of my system in operation from my front panel. Whenever the user clicks on the button, I want to execute once and then stop and exit Flash. I hav
-
Adobe reader Form PDF renderered in Internet Explorer not being read by JAWS
Hello, I'm checking the accessibility of my web application in case of XFA forms generated from Lifecycle Server ES. The standalone version of the PDF forms gets easily read by JAWS but when the same PDF is embedded in a web application JAWS does not