CSS Sorry server requirements

Folks,
The documentation says that the sorry server concept will only work if the loadbalancing is done at layer 7. My question is why, why can't i see the sorry server redirect if all services are down when doing load balancing at Layer 3 or Layer 4?

Hi,
Can you point me to those docs. I believe sorry server should work regardless of which layer is the content rule configured to check.
Actually this doc's example is layer 3:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/contnetw/ps789/products_configuration_example09186a0080093de8.shtml
I will build a working config at layer 3 for you soon.

Similar Messages

  • CSS Sorry Server for HTTPS

    How to configure Sorry server for HTTPS (443) port. Sorry server works fine with HTTP, But not with 443
    In the following config if server1 and server2 are down, the HTTP requests goes to the Sorry Server, but for HTTPS nothing is displayed. I am running the sorry server on port 81
    Please suggest
    !************************** SERVICE **************************
    service prisorry
    ip address 10.100.11.11
    keepalive type http
    keepalive port 81
    port 81
    active
    service secsorry
    ip address 10.100.11.12
    keepalive port 81
    keepalive type http
    port 81
    active
    service server1
    ip address 10.100.11.11
    keepalive type http
    keepalive port 80
    active
    service server2
    ip address 10.100.11.12
    keepalive type http
    keepalive port 80
    active
    !*************************** OWNER ***************************
    owner Loadbalancing
    content L4Rule1
    protocol tcp
    add service server2
    add service server1
    port 80
    url "/*"
    vip address 10.100.11.4
    advanced-balance sticky-srcip-dstport
    primarySorryServer prisorry
    secondarySorryServer secsorry
    active
    content L4Rule2
    protocol tcp
    add service server2
    port 443
    add service server1
    vip address 10.100.11.4
    advanced-balance sticky-srcip-dstport
    primarySorryServer prisorry
    secondarySorryServer secsorry
    application ssl
    active
    content L4Rule3
    add service server2
    protocol tcp
    port 1443
    add service server1
    vip address 10.100.11.4
    advanced-balance sticky-srcip-dstport
    primarySorryServer prisorry
    secondarySorryServer secsorry
    active
    Thanks

    I just deployed a couple 11050's the other day so my experience is limited, but I'd guess your problem is that, when using the Primary Sorry Server, you end up with clients sending HTTPS requests to an HTTP port. Having HTTPS requests redirected to HTTP ports is one thing because the client then makes an HTTP request to that port, but the way you have it above, it appears to me that the client will be talking HTTPS to port 81 on the Sorry Server, which is listening for HTTP.

  • CSS Sorry Server subdirectory

    Is it possible to define a sorry service with a specific url without service type redirect ?
    I want to specify the url location of the sorry service page.
    Thanks

    you will need a redirect if you want to change the original request from the client.
    Or, if your sorryserver is configured to display the same page, whatever the client request, then you do not need the redirect.
    You just need a normal service.
    Regards,
    Gilles.

  • CSS 11501 - Balancing vs. Sorry Server

    Hi,
    I need a little advice.
    I have configured my test CSS box with two services. I enabled keepalives and load balancing with one server having a weight of 5, while the other is set to the default.
    Testing has proven successfull in redirecting requests when the primary server (weight 5) is taken offline. However, when it comes back online, not all requests are sent to it, and some requests still go to the secondary server.
    My question:
    If I want all requests to go to the primary server except in the event it is unavailable, should I configure the secondary server as a Sorry server, and not as a load balanced peer? I would effectively be using the Sorry server as a secondary content server.
    Is this workable? Am I missing something?
    Thanks,
    JM

    JM,
    yes you need the sorryserver option if you don't want traffic to go to your backup.
    Whatever weight option you configure, there will always be a fraction of the traffic going to the backup.
    Gilles.

  • Sorry Server for CSS 11500

    Hi,
    I have a question regarding sorry server configuration on the CSS 11500 series.
    Is there a way for the sorry server to ignore the URL path and always send the user traffic to the "root" page (e.g. index.html) of the sorry server web server?
    The problem I have is the redirection of the "root" page (url "/") that is configured for the normal traffic is causing the sorry page not to work since the URL path ("/psp/CUSTOMER1/?cmd=login") does not exist on the sorry page web server:
    service Sorry-Server
      protocol tcp
      port 8000
      keepalive type tcp
      ip address 192.168.2.254
      active
    service server1
      ip address 192.168.2.101
      protocol tcp
      keepalive type tcp
      port 8080
      active
    service server2
      ip address 192.168.2.102
      protocol tcp
      keepalive type tcp
      port 8080
      active
    owner Customer1
      content Content1
        vip address 192.168.1.101
        port 80
        protocol tcp
        url "/*"
        balance aca
        advanced-balance arrowpoint-cookie
        flow-timeout-multiplier 6
        add service server1
        add service server2
        primarySorryServer Sorry-Server
        active
      content Content1-Redirect
        redirect "/psp/CUSTOMER1/?cmd=login"
        vip address 192.168.1.101
        port 80
        protocol tcp
        url "/"
        active
    Thanks in advance for your help!
    Best regards,
    Harry

    Hi again,
    During a maintenance window I made the following change and that made things a bit better:
    service Sorry-Server
      type redirect
      keepalive type none
      redirect-string "192.168.2.254:8000"
      active
    However, since the redirect string points to a private address, Internet users are not able to access the URL.
    As a work-around I sent the redirect to a new content rule with a public address and then configured a second sorry page server:
    service Sorry-Server
      type redirect
      keepalive type none
      redirect-string "sorry.example.com:8000"
      active
    service Sorry-Server-2
      ip address 192.168.2.254
      protocol tcp
      port 8000
      keepalive type tcp
      active
    owner Customer1
      content Content2
        vip address x.x.x.x
        add service Sorry-Server-2
        port 8000
        protocol tcp
        active
    Is there a better way to do this?
    Best regards,
    Harry

  • CSS and a Sorry Server

    I have been trying to get my CSS 11506 to redirct to a Sorry Server when our content servers go offline. We thought that we had it working, but after some downtime it turned out that our configuration did not work.
    After extensive reading I can't figure out what is wrong with my config, or if the problem lies else where. I am attaching my config below, can anyone tell me if they see any problems with what I have or if there is something that I need to do in addition to what I have. Thank you for you help, here is the config:
    *************************** GLOBAL ***************************
    no restrict web-mgmt
    no restrict xml
    bypass persistence disable
    snmp community ******read-write
    snmp name "******"
    snmp contact "*******r"
    snmp location "CSS11056"
    snmp trap-host 10.20.1.4 ******
    dns primary 10.20.1.2
    ftp-record ******10.20.1.17 *** des-password
    ibfebcgg6aheuc4h1hfcqhpcubwdxcjb cssgui
    ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.20.1.1 1 !
    *************************INTERFACE*************************
    interface 1/1
    phy 1Gbits-FD-sym !
    **************************CIRCUIT**************************
    circuit VLAN1
    router-discovery lifetime 1000
    ip address 10.20.1.4 255.255.255.0
    router-discovery
    **************************SERVICE**************************
    service Blade01
    ip address 10.20.1.60
    active
    service Blade02
    ip address 10.20.1.61
    active
    service Blade03
    ip address 10.20.1.62
    active
    service Blade04
    ip address 10.20.1.63
    active
    service sorry
    ip address 10.20.1.41
    active
    !*************************** OWNER***************************
    owner ***
    email-address ******
    content Content1
    vip address 10.20.1.80
    balance aca
    add service Blade01
    add service Blade02
    no persistent
    primarySorryServer sorry
    active
    content Content2
    vip address 10.20.1.81
    add service Blade03
    add service Blade04
    balance aca
    active
    !*************************** GROUP***************************
    group content1nat
    vip address 10.20.1.80
    add destination service Blade01
    add destination service Blade02
    add destination service sorry
    group content2nat
    add destination service Blade03
    add destination service Blade04
    vip address 10.20.1.81
    !**************************** ACL ****************************
    acl 10
    clause 5 permit any 10.20.1.60 destination content ****
    sourcegroup ****
    clause 6 permit any 10.20.1.61 destination content ICC/flippid
    sourcegroup Content1
    clause 99 permit any any destination any
    clause 2 permit any 10.0.0.0 destination content ****
    sourcegroup ****
    apply circuit-(VLAN1)
    clause 7 permit any 10.20.1.41 destination content ****
    sourcegroup Content1

    One problem I can see is that you don't have any keepalives configured under the services, so they will default to a Ping. As long as they respond to ping, it will keep traffic going to those servers.
    What services run on these Servers? We generally recommend you use as higher layer keepalive as possible, so if it is a web server for example, use a HTTP keepalive.
    Have a look here for more info:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/app_ntwk_services/data_center_app_services/css11500series/v8.10/configuration/content_lb/guide/KAL.html

  • CSS 11051: Sorry Server receives request although the normal server is up

    Hello,
    my customer has configured a sorry for his server. If the normal server is down the Sorry Server receives the requests. That works fine. But if the normal server comes back the Sorry Server still receives some requests( 2 hours and more). Has anybody an idea what might be the reason for that ?
    regards
    Dietrich Schleyer
    content webserver
    add service server12
    vip address 10.40.52.20
    primarySorryServer server13
    protocol tcp
    port 80
    url "/*"
    no persistent
    active
    service server12
    ip address 10.40.52.12
    port 80
    protocol tcp
    keepalive type named applicationwww01
    active
    service server13
    ip address 10.40.52.13
    protocol tcp
    port 80
    keepalive type named applicationwww02
    active
    keepalive applicationwww01
    ip address 10.40.52.12
    port 80
    type http non-persistent
    uri "/test.html"
    frequency 10
    method get
    active
    keepalive applicationwww02
    ip address 10.40.52.13
    port 80
    uri "/test.html"
    frequency 10
    method get
    type http non-persistent
    active

    According to: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/117/css_sorry_server.html “After the CSS 11000 directs requests to a primary sorry server, the switch will continue to use the primary sorry server even when the original server becomes functional. To force the connection back to the original server, you must suspend the primary sorry server or wait until the connection is dropped or times out. When a new session is initiated by the CSS 11000, the connection should go back to the original server.”

  • Sorry server - different replies

    We have CSS 11000 that provides load balancing between several servers with configured max-session .
    How to configure that sorry server sends different reply:
    1) if all servers are down, it has redirect to page "sorry, server is down"
    2) in case of overload, it it has to redirect to page "sorry, server is bussy, try later"
    Can you advise how it possible to configue this?
    thanks in advance,
    Natalia

    there is no direct way of doing this.
    However, my solution is to do this :
    service sorry_down
    service sorry_overloaded
    keepalive type script check_service_down use-output
    owner mycompany
    content www
    vip ...
    add service ...
    primarysorryserver sorry_overloaded
    secondarysorryserver sorry_down
    active
    The script check_service_down, will do a 'show service ' grep -u Alive to detect if a service is alive or just not used because down.
    Or you could also simply do ap-kal-pinglist and ping the services.
    Anyway, the idea for the kal for the service sorry_overloaded is to check the status of the other services and detect if they are down or just overloaded.
    Gilles.

  • Sorry server request

    Hi,
    we have two CSS11503 to load balance http and https traffic, we have to know the source IP packet of request to a Sorry Server when all the services on the content are down.
    I mean, when all services into the content are down a request from a client i forwarded to the primary sorry server, is the source IP of the request the load balancer IP address, or is the client IP address wherefrom the request starts?!
    Thanks
    Cinzia

    By default we do not source nat the client ip address.
    But if the sorry server is at a remote location, you will NEED to do source nat for the connection to work, otherwise the sorry server will respond directly to the client bypassing the CSS and the client will not appreciate seeing a response from a different ip than the vip.
    You could use a redirect sorry server, so that a redirect response is sent to the client which does open a new connection directly with the sorry server.
    Gilles.

  • ACE and secondary sorry server?

    Hi,
    I need to transfer the CSS' concept of the "secondary sorry server" to the ACE.
    My (so far untested) idea is: attaching a backup server-farm to the primary server-farm to get the "sorry server" function; attaching a backup rserver to the rserver used in the backup server-farm to get a backup for the backup.
    Will it work this way?
    Arno

    Cascading serverfarms is restricted to one backup level but you can cascade backup for individual servers.

  • Sorry server redirect

    is it possible to confider the css so that is one of the servers goes down that it will redirect the request to the sorry server, as per the documentation all servers have to be done, i want it to go to sorry server if one of the servers goes down. any ides?

    so, you have multiple servers assigned to a content rule, and if one of them goes down, you want the traffic to be redirected to a sorryserver. Is that correct ?
    The only solution would be to create a probe that would bring all servers down at the same time. You can create a global keepalive that uses a script probe that does check each server and assign this same global keepalive to all server. Like this, they will all go down at the same time and your sorryserver will be used.
    Gilles.

  • The SMTP server requires a secure connection or the client was not authenticated. The server response was: 5.5.1 Authentication Required.

     try
                    MailMessage mail = new MailMessage();
                    SmtpClient SmtpServer = new SmtpClient("smtp.gmail.com");
                    mail.From = new MailAddress("[email protected]");
                    mail.To.Add("[email protected]");
                    mail.Subject = "Test Mail..!!!!";
                    mail.Body = "mail with attachment";
                    System.Net.Mail.Attachment attachment;
                    attachment = new System.Net.Mail.Attachment(@"C:\Attachment.txt");
                    mail.Attachments.Add(attachment);
                    SmtpServer.Port = 587;
                    SmtpServer.UseDefaultCredentials = true;
                    SmtpServer.Credentials = new System.Net.NetworkCredential("userid", "Password");
                    SmtpServer.EnableSsl = true;
                    SmtpServer.Send(mail);
    Catch(Exception exception)
    When i m run this part of code it throw an Ecxeption                                                          
            Given Below is the Error.. 
        The SMTP server requires a secure connection or the client was not authenticated. The server response was: 5.5.1 Authentication Required.
    Bikky Kumar

     try
                    MailMessage mail = new MailMessage();
                    SmtpClient SmtpServer = new SmtpClient("smtp.gmail.com");
                    mail.From = new MailAddress("[email protected]");
                    mail.To.Add("[email protected]");
                    mail.Subject = "Test Mail..!!!!";
                    mail.Body = "mail with attachment";
                    System.Net.Mail.Attachment attachment;
                    attachment = new System.Net.Mail.Attachment(@"C:\Attachment.txt");
                    mail.Attachments.Add(attachment);
                    SmtpServer.Port = 587;
    SmtpServer.UseDefaultCredentials = true;    ///Set it to false, or remove this line
                    SmtpServer.Credentials = new System.Net.NetworkCredential("userid", "Password");
                    SmtpServer.EnableSsl = true;
                    SmtpServer.Send(mail);
    Catch(Exception exception)
    Given Below is the Error..      The SMTP server requires a secure connection or the client was not authenticated. The server response was: 5.5.1 Authentication Required.
    Solution:
    The error might occur due to following cases.
    case 1: when the password is wrong
    case 2: when you try to login from some App
    case 3: when you try to login from the domain other than your time zone/domain/computer (This
    is the case in most of scenarios when sending mail from code)
    There is a solution for each
    solution for case 1: Enter the correct password.
    Recomended: solution for case 2: go to
    security settings at the following link https://www.google.com/settings/security/lesssecureapps and
    enable less secure apps . So that you will be able to login from all apps.
    solution 1 for case 3: (This might be helpful) you need to review the activity. but reviewing the activity will not be helpful due to latest security
    standards the link will not be useful. So try the below case.
    solution 2 for case 3: If you have hosted your code somewhere on production server and if you have access to the production server, than take remote
    desktop connection to the production server and try to login once from the browser of the production server. This will add exception for login to google and you will be allowed to login from code.
    But what if you don't have access to the production server. try
    the solution 3
    solution 3 for case 3: You have to enable
    login from other timezone / ip for your google account.
    to do this follow the link https://g.co/allowaccess and
    allow access by clicking the continue button.
    And that's it. Here you go. Now you will be able to login from any of the computer and by any means of app to your google account.
    Regards,
    Nabeel Arif

  • Server requires authentication - How do I program for this?

    Hello,
    I'm testing out a webpage I have created that will be used to send email. I have DSL service...just recently subscribed. Previously I had Dial up. The server at that time didn't require authentication, but now that I have DSL it does. I'm a bit lost as to how to update my program (I've included the snippet in the post), so that it will run correctly. I am having some difficulty.
    My program looked like this :
    String POP3 = "pop.windstream.net";
    String SMTP = "smtp.windstream.net";
    // Specify the SMTP host
    Properties props = new Properties();                                           
    props.put(POP3, SMTP);
    // Create a mail session
    Session ssn = Session.getInstance(props, null);
    ssn.setDebug(true);                  
    //...html to make up the body of the message
    // set the from information
    InternetAddress from = new InternetAddress(emailaddress, fromName);
    // Set the to information
    InternetAddress to = new InternetAddress(EmailAddress2, toName);
    // Create the message
    Message msg = new MimeMessage(ssn);
    msg.setFrom(from);
    msg.addRecipient(Message.RecipientType.TO, to);
    msg.setSubject(emailsubject);
    msg.setContent(body, "text/html");                      
    Transport.send(msg);     
    //....                        I did some research already, and have looked at some other forum posts. The one thing I have noted when I run my program is that the dos prompt for tomcat is showing this:
    *DEBUG: getProvider() returning javax.mail.Provider[TRANSPORT,smpt,com.sun.mail.smtp.SMTPTransport,Sun Microsystem, Inc]*
    DEBUG SMTP: useEhlo true, useAuth false
    DEBUG: SMTPTransport trying to connect to hose "localhost", port 25
    My ISP provider, Windstream, assures me that port 25 is NOT blocked. Also, I've noticed that useAuth is set to false, whereas the posts I have been looking at say true. It would make sense to me for it to be set to true in my case, since my server requires authentication. But how do I do that?
    I found this bit of information from another person's post :
    props.setProperty("mail.smtp.auth", "true");
    you also need an Authenticator like this
    Authenticator auth = new Authenticator() {
    private PasswordAuthentication pwdAuth = new PasswordAuthentication("myaccount", "mypassword");
    protected PasswordAuthentication getPasswordAuthentication() {
    pwdAuth;
    Session session = Session.getDefaultInstance(props, auth);*
    Post located at http://forums.sun.com/thread.jspa?forumID=43&threadID=537461
    From the FAQ section of JavaMail
    Q: When I try to send a message I get an error like SMTPSendFailedException: 530, Address requires authentication.
    A: You need to authenticate to your SMTP server. The package javadocs for the com.sun.mail.smtp package describe several methods to do this. The easiest is often to replace the call Transport.send(msg); with
    String protocol = "smtp";
    props.put("mail." + protocol + ".auth", "true");
    Transport t = session.getTransport(protocol);
    try {
    t.connect(username, password);
    t.sendMessage(msg, msg.getAllRecipients());
    } finally {
    t.close();
    You'll have to supply the appropriate username and password needed by your mail server. Note that you can change the protocol to "smtps" to make a secure connection over SSL.
    One thing I have noticed in the majority of the posts is that useAuth in the tomcat dos prompt should be set to true, and not false. Mine is coming up as false. Also, I think it should be set to true because the ISP's server requires authentication for sending and receiving email.
    Can you please provide me with some input on how to update my program so it will run?
    Thank you in advance:)

    Thank you for replying.
    Per your advice, I made these changes to my code:
    Properties props = new Properties();                                           
    props.setProperty("mail.smtp.auth", "true");               
    props.put("mail.pop3.host", POP3);
    props.put("mail.smtp.host", SMTP);
    Session ssn = Session.getInstance(props, null); The props.setProperty("mail.smtp.auth","true"); is something I found previously to posting my question. I'm assuming this is the line of code that has changed useAuth from false to true...is that correct?
    I'm most pleased to report that with the changes made above, my program works! But is my code good? As soon as I start taking on clients, I will need my code to be reliable, and it needs to work with Dial Up and DSL connections.
    With regards to your question about how I had found the authentication code but hadn't used it. Well, I did try it, again, this was previous to posting my question, and the compiler couldn't compile the program because of this statement - pwdAuth;
    I also tried this code I had found in the JavaMail FAQ section -
    String protocol = "smtp";
    props.put("mail." + protocol + ".auth", "true");
    Transport t = session.getTransport(protocol);
    try {
    t.connect(username, password);
    t.sendMessage(msg, msg.getAllRecipients());
    } finally {
    t.close();
    }But according to the compiler, t.connect(username,password); was not an available method. I checked the documentation and found that to be true. Do you have any suggestions? Looking into the documentation I find that there are 3 methods called connect that are inherited by the Transport class from javax.mail.Service.
    connect()
    connect(java.lang.String host, int port, java.lang.String user, java.lang.String password)
    connect(java.lang.String host, java.lang.String user, java.lang.String password)
    I would opt to try the third connect method, but what would I put for host?
    Thank you for helping me with this issue, I'm not an expert on using the JavaMail package, at least not yet, and I appreciate the help you have provided.

  • The specified forest functional level is invalid. "Lync Server" requires forests running in Windows 2003 mode or higher.

    Dear Support Team,
    i am having the error ''The specified forest functional level is invalid. "Lync Server" requires forests running in Windows 2003 mode or higher'' from lync 2013 during the schema master prepare on windows server 2008r2 and my forest functional
    level are 2008r2.. so can you help me please...?

    Dear Support Team,
    in my network there are one forest and two domain controller (primary and secondary).. my domain functional
    level is windows server 2008r2.. but i am still receiving error.. when i hit the run button for schema prepare its says:
    ServerSchemaPrepareTask execution failed on an unrecoverable error.
    and when i open log it sasys: 
    Error: The specified forest functional level is invalid. "Lync Server" requires forests running in Windows 2003 mode or higher.
    kindly help me

  • Sorry Server Config for 11503

    I have added a service for the sorr server and I have added the name of the server SorryServer1 to the content rule. However when I suspend the content rule I get a Page Not diplayed instead of the redirect to the Sorry Server.
    The config has mulitple Content rules, I am currently only testing on one.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    if you suspend the whole content rule the sorry server can not do it's action as the rule is "down" you need do suspend all services except the sorry server.
    Kind Regards,
    Joerg
    PS
    For a HowTo and recommendations refer to http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/hw/contnetw/ps792/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a00801579f2.html#1038009

Maybe you are looking for