CU50 - Variant Interface Design

I am trying to change my Interface design for a Variant Material using CU50. However, when I click on the menu option Value Assignment > Interface Design, all my options are greyed out (aka I can't select them). I have a valid configuration profile and I have specified an Interface design title on my configuration profile in CU42.
What would cause those options to be unavailable (greyed out)? Am I missing an option on my configuration profile? Is there something in SPRO I'm missing?
Thank you,
Scott

1.kindly check if youa re having the authorisation for the below object C_LOVC_DSG
2. Also are u trying some thing like characteristic grouping ?
revert back
reg
dsk

Similar Messages

Interface Design- Varient Configuration

Hi
I am very much new to this functionality-Varient Configuration.
I did not understand why we define Interface design while creating the configuration profile
and how this is going to help.
Thanks & Regards
Satish

Hi Satish,
see SAP Help:
Interface Design - Overview - Variant Configuration (LO-VC) - SAP Library
The benefit to create an interface design is the user interface of CU50 or MM02 etc.
You can group your characteristics e.g. according to marketing/engineering/manufacturing and then all the responsible people can have their own set as a separate tab in CU50 when doing the configuration simulation.
You can also use buttons to use different functions of VC.
Hope this helps.
Best regards
Tamas

Interface design in config profile

Hi
After creation of interface design in config profile and I have assigned new tab in cu50 .
But after I have created one sale order , then I removed interface design object from config profile again I maintained same as like before .
But once I changed interface design even though I maintain again which is not updating as like before.
Can you tell me wt should I do for the same?
Regards
Ishikesh

pls close this issue

No Refreshed Interface Design in After Effects CC 2014

Sort of an odd question, but how do you change the interface design in After Effects CC 2014 to be the new "Refreshed Interface Design"? Like with the blue text color, borders, and different look panels (as seen in the first image linked). I updated to Adobe After Effects CC 2014 yesterday, and for some reason, my interface design has not changed at all. Is there somewhere in preferences where I can change this? I would appreciate any help, thanks.
What it is supposed to look like:
http://helpx.adobe.com/after-effects/using/whats-new/_jcr_content/main-pars/image_1.img.pn g/ae-interface.png
What my After Effects looks like:
http://puu.sh/dfYbm/aa366e60fd.png

Your second image shows After Effects CC 2014 (13.0). The new UI comes with After Effects CC 2014 (13.1).
I'm curious about how, exactly, you installed the software, since you should have gotten After Effects CC 2014 (13.1.1) if you installed from the Creative Cloud service.

CS5/CS4 GUI User Interface Design

I have always been very unimpressed with the user interface design on Adobe CS4. It's riddled with problems and changes that make no sense and offer no advantages.
For example, there is no longer a normal Windows title bar in many of the CS4 apps. This makes it much more difficult to maximize/restore applications since normally a Windows user could simply throw the mouse to the top edge of the screen and double click the title bar. In fact, doing this with CS4 apps has ZERO function (it doesn't do anything). One would think that by moving the menu commands to the top bar of the window chrome, Adobe would make these menus accessible from the top-most edge of the screen in order to increase usability. Unfortunately this is not so and clicking the top most edge of a maximized window does nothing.
Two other very important parts of an application user interface are the upper left and upper right corners. Normally when a Windows application is maximized, throwing your pointer to the upper right corner and clicking will close the application. Throwing the pointer to the upper left corner and clicking will reveal the application window menu. This happens in ALL applications... EXCEPT for Adobe CS4 programs. These two extremely important application window command locations have been completely disabled in Adobe CS4 apps. Clicking the upper most corner pixels in a maximized Adobe CS4 app does nothing.
Then there's the tabbed document window interface. If you float a document window and maximize that, normally you would expect it to become maximized within the application window as it should. Au contraire, in Adobe CS4, the document window maximizes itself ON TOP OF the application window, thus obscuring and disabling any access to the application window's tools/commands. I did report that as a bug during beta, but obviously it was ignored. Seems kind of obvious to me that the fact that a user could accidentally make the entire application completely unusable by maximizing a document window might be a problem.
It still alludes me as to why Adobe changed the CS4 user interface to something that breaks so many Windows UI conventions. Adobe CS3 was a practically perfect user interface design on Windows. It was very customizable, all of the normal Windows functions were properly in place.
What's the deal with the change?
I thought maybe the file menu was moved in place of the title bar in order to make more room for other UI elements, but it's actually pretty much the same size as the old file menu title bar combination in CS3.
With all these changes and with all the functionality losses, what exactly have we gained in the CS4 GUI? Seriously, I'm asking.
Anyway, I hope Adobe starts reading the Windows User Experience Guidelines (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa511331.aspx) and brings CS5 back to the way a Windows application should behave. Proper theme adherence would be nice too.
Which brings me to Windows 7. I love love love the way Windows 7 groups application document previews in one taskbar icon and allows aero-peek for open windows. Adobe CS 4 obviously does not support this since it does not have normal document windows. I hope CS5 does because it is a great feature. I also hope Adobe CS5 implements the Windows 7 jumplists and maybe even a more touch/multi-touch friendly interface. I've become pretty good at processing photos in Bridge using the touchscreen, and it's very cool, but it could use some improvements.
For an example of great user interface design, has anyone tried Office 2010 on Windows 7 yet? http://www.istartedsomething.com/20090512/screencaps-office-2010-technical-preview-teched- 2009-keynote/
The faded transparent title bar and tabbed ribbon interface is absolutely gorgeous.

@Adam:
I agree with your comments! So well said!
And there are other issues, too -- by the color of the app window, you don't know if the window is active or inactive (focus or not in focus). Titles of panels which are inactive, are dark text over dark background -- hardly readable at all... And many more.
I really hope Adobe are listening...

Is this new interface design right or do I still have some graphic probs ?

Is that interface design right after the last update ?? I think the old onne looked much more clear for a better workflow... this one just looks a little cheap and strange to me ....
brgds
SG

the stripes are supposed to be the "locked" visualtization, but anyhow it locks strange to me .. well i will see ... thank you anyway :-)

Cisco 5508 interface design problem

Cisco 5508 interface design
now i have connect wlc into infra same picture but ap can't register into wlc. How create interface for this diagram. please help me because access switch is unmanage switch i can't config trunk on this.i can install for this solution this isn't ?
thank you for best support.
samy

Why are your AP's on different Vlans?
If you plan to create SSID's on different Vlans then you will need a trunk port to the WLC as the switch needs to pass tagged frames to it and the WLC needs to pass tagged frames back.
Out of interest, you are using a 5508 which is a fairly expensive piece of kit yet you are connecting it to an unmanaged switch. Why?

Interface Designer: "Reading Class File" fails

I'm just trying the Apple Cocoa Tutorial (ConcurrencyConverter). I have a problem at the point where you shall load the class file "ConverterController.h" into the Interface Designer. It always fails with the error "Parsed 1 source file, but no buttons were found...".
Even when I copy and paste the header file from the tutorial it doesn't work. It looks like this:
#import <Cocoa/Cocoa.h>
@interface ConverterController : NSObject {
IBOutlet NSTextField *amountField;
IBOutlet NSTextField *dollarField;
IBOutlet NSTextField *rateField;
- (IBAction)convert:(id)sender;
@end
I have no idea what to do now, can you help me?

digitalformula wrote:
Your note about the outlets etc actually being there but needing to look harder made me stare at the screen for a few minutes ... I can't see them though.
Maybe they just don't show up in Xcode 3.2.1???
Hi DF -
I don't know how to guide you further since I don't have 3.2.1. Did you see Ruud's most recent post?
Ruud Wijnands wrote:
... if you click on the connections tab they are shown there in in unconnected state.
Assuming this much hasn't changed since 3.1.4, besides the Class Outlets table in the Identity Inspector, there are two places to look for Outlet and Action connections:
1) When you ctrl-click on an object (e.g. the icon for a controller), a black, floating panel should come up listing all connections from and to that object. Be sure to select the object in the xib (icon) window with the View Mode switch in the Center position. With that View Mode setting, the xib window should display a two column table with a tree of small icons to the left. By expanding the nodes in that tree you should be able to find every object in the xib;
2) When you select an object (in the xib window as above), the Connections Inspector (cmd-5) should display all possible connections from and to the object. I assume this is the view Ruud referred to as "the connections tab".
I don't recall seeing a case where the black panel list differed from the list shown in the Connections Inspector, but it wouldn't hurt to look at both. If neither of the above finds the connections when _you've seen your custom class in the Identity list, and set the object in question to that class_, I might suggest closing the xib and restarting IB. You could also try modifying and resaving your custom object's @interface file just to stir things up a bit (e.g., remove all the IBOutlet declarations, save, then add them and resave).
It might also help to start a new project and do nothing else but add one custom class to see if you have better luck getting IB to import the correct connections in the new context. E.g., add a NSObject subclass named Foo with one ivar such as IBOutlet NSWindow *Bar; then see if you can add a blue cube to MainMenu.xib, set its identity to Foo class and see the Bar outlet.
For more details on connecting custom objects, see "Setting the Class of an Object" and "Injecting Class Information into a Nib File" under Xcode Integration in the +Interface Builder User Guide+.
Of course it's possible we're dealing with a bug that's unique to 64-bit 3.2.1. I've searched the web, the 3.2.1 Release Notes and the Xcode Mailing List for reports that might confirm this, but haven't found anything interesting yet. So I think we should continue to assume that Xcode 3.2.1 is capable of obtaining custom class info, and we're just dealing with some misunderstanding. Hopefully, one of our forum experts who has 3.2.1 will join the thread to shed some more light on the topic.
\- Ray

Interface design V class design

Why is it more important for an interface design than for a class design to anticipate all possible uses for the interface?

come on.. I was gonna do this
//interface
interface IshouldBeSleeping
public void IamSadistic();
class WhyAreWeAnsweringThis
public double habitualProcessOfWorkingForLameCurrency
return 0.0001;
}

How much do you get paid annually for this job User Interface Designer?

how much do you get paid annually for this job User Interface Designer?

Apple probably will not discuss salaries even for specific jobs other than with applicants. If you wish to discuss salaries, you'll most likely have to apply for a specific position and then get beyond the initial screening.
This issue has nothing to do with Apple Remote Desktop, the topic of this forum, by the way.
Regards.

Extension user interface design

Hi all,
I'm looking into how Adobe can help developers make their extensions look better integrated with the Creative Suite.
Probably the most common request we've heard in the past is for an improved Creative Suite Flex theme SWC.
Do you have any further thoughts/feature requests in this area?
I would be particularly interested to know whether you use CSXSLibrary to get the host application's skin information. If you do, does the API provide sufficient information to customise your extension's appearance effectively? If not, is there anything you'd like to see changed in the API for it to be useful to you? Here are the classes currently available:
AppSkinInfo - accessible through CSXSInterface.getHostEnvironment()
AppReskinEvent - dispatched when a CS app changes its appearance.
All feedback much appreciated.
Thanks
David.

The intention is to make the preloader (that's the generic loading bar that displays for a few seconds when the panel first opens) for your extension to be completely invisible.
That will make it take the colour of the content behind it, which is the default panel colour for the application. You could also change the colour of the preloader, to match the eventual one of the panel, or you could create your own preloader SWF.
You can find more information on preloaders for Flex 3 at http://livedocs.adobe.com/flex/3/html/help.html?content=app_container_4.html and a tutorial on creating your own at http://www.leebrimelow.com/?p=916
Best,
James
From: Adobe Forums <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2012 20:25:59 +0000
To: James Boag <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Extension user interface design
Re: Extension user interface design
created by softsign<http://forums.adobe.com/people/softsign> in Creative Suite SDK - View the full discussion<http://forums.adobe.com/message/4114198#4114198

Improving Interface design

Hi all ,
I need your suggestions in improving the current interface design.
We have an interface: Sending System--->(JMS Adapter) PI 7.1(IDOC) --> (Idoc)ECC
This is the current situation:
Sending System sends 1 file with 1000 transactions, out of which 70% gets filtered in PI and sends nearly 300 idocs to ECC.
Right now we have this interface for 1 company code. Few transactions should give out DELIVERY idoc and few should give out MBGMCR idocs.
Few Fields like MESSAGECODE, MESSAGEFUNCTION, MOVETYPE, etc in the IDOCS etc. have complex udfu2019s.
UDFu2019s have the logic based on 6 incoming fields(companycode, Transaction, Supplier, PO,ReturnComp, DirectWithdrawal)
2 Message mappings- one for MBGMCR and 1 for DELIVERY
In receiver Determination.. we are doing routing based on company code.
In Interface determination, we have a complex condition for MBGMCR (based on 5 fields)which is taking 3 times more than mapping execution time (Mapping-2 sec and Interface mapping condition check takes 6 sec).
New Business Requirement:
Now the business wants us to develop a prototype which will reduce extensive testing when new conditions are added. So they want more flexible solution as this interface will be taking care of the further rollouts where new plants and conditions will be added. While adding new conditions business is worried that the existing logic shouldnu2019t be affected and retested.
So few options which came into picture are:
1. Maintaining a database table where a table will be updated with conditions. In PI we will do a look up to check the incoming values match the values in table and return the corresponding output values.
Consequences: Due to large volumes sent everyday nearly 500,000 messages a day . Each msg containing 1000 transactions out of which 70% gets filtered in PI. So we expect 500,000 RFC calls will lead to performance issues in PI.
2. Filtering Transactions on the sending system & sending some kind of flags (for transactions to be processed) which will reduce filtering in PI and save lot of system resources also. But this is not feasible from business point of view.
So now the question is :
Is there any other better way to avoid retest of the currently existing logic when new conditions are added .
(keeping performance in mind.)
Your suggestions are highly appreciated.
(I know this a lengthy post. But Thanks for your time and for your valuable suggestions)

While adding new conditions business is worried that the existing logic shouldnu2019t be affected and retested.
honest opinion would be the person who does the re-config needs to be more careful and not touch the existing mapping/ routing conditions etc.
there is no other way wherein you can say that shield part1 of the MappingA while somebody makes a new change to the same mapping.
If your fear (or of the business') that it may happen that even existing logic is deleted while making new one then as a workaround you can suggest that we can easily retrieve the old logic (object)...at least when it comes to ESR/ IB.

R/3 to AS/400 Interface Design Advice

Hi,
I need some design adivice on a Synchronous Interface involving R/3 and and an AS/400 system.The requirement is as follows,
The shipping Company uses AS/400 systems,Goods to be shipped are scanned at thier end using hand held scanners,Once a box is scanned for shipment , a message from the scanner containing Order Info and Line Item details needs to be sent to an R/3 table to update and then an acknowledgement needs to be sent to the AS/400 system,The frequency of these messages could be around 20 per minute, I am not very aware how things work on the AS/400 system,but know that currently they use a ODBC link.
Could I use XI as a middleware for this kind of interface, If yes how would i connect to the AS/400 system(which is inside our Landscape) and would XI handle and process 20 messages (around 50Kb each) per minute.would this work as if it were a direct connection..to R/3..?
I was thinking of using RFC's however wanted to know any better options .Any suggestions on this would be greatly appreciated...! Knidly let me know if you ned any more info... Thanks a ton..!!

At a high level, it looks like we have to go for a
JDBC-XI-Proxy scenario for your interface.
As/400 databases system send the data to the XI system which send the data to SAP system via a Inbound Proxy(Synchronous)
Here are some links for JDBC :
AS400 acess using JDBC adapter
Re: JDCB Connection from XI to AS400
JDBC drivers for DB2 on AS400 V5R3
Regards,
Ravu

Best approach - Interface design

Hi,
I have an interface where from source A, 2 completely different XML messages are posted to a web service on source B.
What is the the best practice for designing the interface?
1. Should I create 2 different applications one for each message and call the web service individually (so any change to web service I have to maintain it twice) or
2. create 3 different applications 2 for source and 1 for target (any changes to target will make sure both are in synch) or
3. create 1 application and handle the messages (is this a clean approach to combine different messages in one application)?
Thank you.

Hi,
I have an interface where from source A, 2 completely different XML messages are posted to a web service on source B.
What is the the best practice for designing the interface?
1. Should I create 2 different applications one for each message and call the web service individually (so any change to web service I have to maintain it twice) or
2. create 3 different applications 2 for source and 1 for target (any changes to target will make sure both are in synch) or
3. create 1 application and handle the messages (is this a clean approach to combine different messages in one application)?
Thank you.

Why hasn't Adobe navigation and user interface design improved as much as it could have over time?

I haven't tried CS6. I'm sure it's great based on what i've seen alone. But as a user of adobe products for a number of years, i have to noticed there are still a lot of stagnant,awkward, stiff, irriating, slowing down elements found in the navigation and user interface on cs3-cs5, that i'm sure could have been eliminated or improved on at least from 2005 or 2007 onwards. I find some of these things inexcusable and unprogressive from bad traits that defined 1980's and 1990's general computer navigation and so on.
CS5.5 has lessned this a bid bit and is more fluid in bits and pieces but for those using cs3-cs5 and in general, i find some things just horrid. As a graphic designer no one is supposed to admit the flaws or irrations of these programs. We must hail them as god, never critisize, and always adjust to new things which i think is a bit fascististic and silly
The way the tools, options are laid out can be improved to be quicker, and easier to find and use. Using your voice as a commanding system would be helpful as well.
A lot of cmds are too complex to remember, they can be simplier or resemble the name of the tool or option. Its makes a chore to follow this system and competition for the smart *** who memormized all the cmds.
The way in which you loose floating side boxes, and the amount of tools or names hidden in the bars sometimes seem random and its always a constant search to find them incase you forget where they are.
The inability to open cs4 or 5 files in cs3 is just beyond extremly annoying. Whey shouldn't you be able to open cs1 or 2 files or photoshop 9 files as well? Every five years work expires as well?
The layering system gets tricky and seems that a lot of things don't work when you normally move things. Its about going back, remembering and clicking on this or that, looking it up to make everything work. Sometimes which leaves you in a rut and wastes a good amount of time. You will always find this even after you've been using it for years.
The use of the fill paint/airbrushing, clone tool, lasso tool, pen tool, history being two steps back can be vastly improved to be much better to use
Masking and tools that have more complex features should find a way be automatically done or sampled. They can also have less complex steps and tha ability to be previewed, automatic or simpler ( in case you can't remember how to do something or aren't getting it)
A lot of the special effects, and blending modes are useless, outdated, super-ugly and don't resemble true darkroom effects ( such as polarization, and bas-relief for example) which they could much more vividly done. There also could be more options that are closer to repro cameras/CTP software for halftoning and more complex digital effects.
Having to press or get used to pressing muliple keys or clicks for the most basic things simultaneously can be reduced to be easier
Adjusting text, new documents, photos should have a smoother, quicker navigational experince where things a lot of room to be , clicked back, re-done, saved in the wrong place etc..
Indesign could use more shapes, include more features that illustrator has, and possibly even photoshop to save time.
There should be a way to remind you of features, complex things you've forgotten, other than history and daily usage/practice of the programs
The help should resemble more of "visual -learners" guide books with voice features.
There are a lot more
Regarding other things:
I think the price encorages more piracy and allows people to not have a concept of what is means to owning software.
The loss of a manual or lessening of them for certain programs is a loss because it's always useful to physical info you can flip through while looking at your program.
I think adobe should make entirely better products for professionals or people in the industry rather than spoonfeeding the same software to all.
They should also make less expensive add-ons like before for graphic software.
What do you adobe could have improved over time and if so what do you think they could have improved on?

You have this wishform to suggest improvements to Adobe products:
https://www.adobe.com/cfusion/mmform/index.cfm?name=wishform
and the Creative Suites forums are here:
http://forums.adobe.com/community/creativesuites
This specific forum is only for discussions on the forums themselves, so you are not very likely to get any change by posting your comments here.

CU50 - Variant Interface Design

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for