CUA ?

How many process are usually required to correctly run CUA? Changes were made to our system and since, have been having odd occurrences.
Thank YOU All!

Sending and processing IDOCs in background serializes the requests and therefore reduces the count of work processes which are running in parallel.
CUA central system:
1 for the administratior working with the CUA
3*n to send the IDOCs for every user which is replicated to one of "n" target systems
3*n to receive the status about processing of an IDOC for every user which is replicated to one of "n" target systems
Most of these work processes are running for a very short time, however, you still need a couple of free work processes in the CUA central system.
Note <a href="https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/399271">399271</a> shows tips for optimizing ALE distribution performance of the CUA.
Kind regards
Frank Buchholz

Similar Messages

Logical systems in production with CUA

Hi,
We have recently implemented CUA and are rolling out ECC 6.0. We created the logical systems for development, QA, and production in the development system and transported them to QA and production.
The solution manager system is the CUA master.
We normally only have production logical systems defined in production and would like to remove the development, QA, and solution manager systems. If we attempt to delete these definitions in production in SALE, it complains that the logical system is still used in distrubution model CUA, although solution manager, not production, is the CUA master.
If we are using CUA, do we have to have all logical systems defined in all client systems?
TIA,
Russ

Hi Pradeep,
I don't think that's quite it. SM1 is the master. I'm in the production system (PE1) trying to delete the development system (DB1). I am not trying to delete SM1. I'm getting the following message.
Logical system DB1CLNT300 must not be deleted
Message no. B1199
Diagnosis
The logical system DB1CLNT300 is still used in distribution model CUA (client 800).
System Response
The deletion cannot be carried out.
Procedure
Confirm that the logical system DB1CLNT300 is really no longer used. Delete it first from distribution model CUA (client 800), then delete it here.
Thanks and best regards,
Russ

Error in job for connection to CUA System

I have a problem with the two jobs in the u2018AS ABAP - Initial loadu2019 for a CUA system. According to the log is seems to be a memory issue!!!!
Extract from the logfile:
u2026u2026u2026
26.03.2009 09:57:31 :I:Initializing custom pass FromSAP: ReadABAPRoles
26.03.2009 09:57:31 :I:Initializing MX SAP BAPI object
26.03.2009 09:57:31 :W:Filter not supported when Listing CUA Roles. Ignoring :*
26.03.2009 09:57:35 :E:Unhandled Error in DSERuntime
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space (failed to allocate 84038672 bytes)
u2026u2026u2026
This error is related to the both the jobs: ReadABAPRoles and ReadABAPProfiles.
Please note:
Setting the %$rep.CUA_MASTER% equal u2018falseu2019 using the repository constant works for the both jobs (only the roles and/or profile in u2018localu2019 system the is read meaning no data from the subsystems in the CUA is read )
Any suggestions for handling this problem??
Best Regards
Tom Svarre

The text you enter in the dispatcher script after JAVAOPTIONS= is passed on as one parameter to the java executable. When you set JAVAOPTIONS=-Xmx256M -Xmx256M the effect is like the commandline java "-Xmx256M -Xms256M" java interprets this as an illegal heap size and refuses to start.
If you want to specify more than one javaoption, you also have to set MXDISPATCHER_EXECSTRING=1
This option causes the dispatcher to pass the arguments to the java executable as one string instead of split into separate parameters.
The reason this option is not turned on by default, is that this can cause problems with paths and parameters containing special characters that causes the command line interpreter to fail.
In your case, only specifyng the -Xmx is probably the best solution. Specifying -Xms will cause heavier load on the system also for jobs thatdoes not need a large heap.

How to copy a role from one client to another in a system using the CUA?

Dear all,
I have a question about transporting roles. We have CUA configured on our SAP system. Our development environment contains several clients. Recently I created a role by using PFCG in the development environment named E1D-100. Later there was a need to affect a user by this role but on another client of the development environment named E1D-200.
How can I transport a role from a client of the development environment to another client of the same environment.
While I use SU01 to assign the role, after clicking on "user comparing", I can see that the new created role exists on E1D-100 (the client of the development environment where the role was created), but I see that the role doesn't exist on the other client E1D-200.
How should I proceed?
Thanks in advance,
Dariyoosh

Hello again,
Thank you very much for all of your answers. I tried both solutions and both worked pretty well. Thanks a lot for your help.
Kind Regards,
Dariyoosh

Creating users in enterprise portals with CUA as userbase

Hi All,
we are using CUA system for maintaining the users and we want this users to be used in enterprise portals. So while installing WebAs itself, we specified the connection details to this CUA system. then we installed portal and we were able to view the users of CUA in portal.
now i am creating a user from portal, create user option in UserManagement. but i just get an error like, could not create a user.
i checked out in system administration->umconfiguration-> sap system. all the details that we specified during the webas installation appear there by default.
so could you please let me know what the problem could be
thank you

Raj,
I know that your problem was solved, but I've come across following SAP link. Hope, it helps other ppl..
TITLE: Requirements for Service User Used to Connect to SAP Systems
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_ep60sp2/helpdata/en/8f/67d27676ace84080964d4c4223bb3c/content.htm
Thanks,
Pritesh.

Custom code after creating a new user via CUA

Hi experts!
In our landscape we are using CUA for adding users in CRM 7.0. A new requirement is to adjust some default Web UI related settings for every new user created. There is no standard customizing setting for that, but it is possible to programmatically set prsonal settings using cl_pers_admin class' set_data method.
The question is if there is any BADI or User Exit for user creation procedure? If it is present, wouldn't it conflict with CUA routines? Many thanks in advance.

No. Not the main Library folder. Make absolutely sure you are in the Home Library folder and not the main Library folder.
Your Home Library folder is hidden in Lion. To get to it, in the Finder menu, select GO and hold the option key down. Select Library in the submenu. The Finder window will open in your Home Library. This is where your user prefs are stored.
Once there, you will see the Preferences folder. Open it up, select all items within it and move them to the trash. You will need to restart in order for the new Finder preferences to be recreated.
Once you restart, then you will be back to the default preferences to the system and all applications. And yes, it will affect all settings including your Dock, just as logging into a new user. You will have to reset everything there also.
If you wish to do a selective method, instead of deleting all preferences, try deleting the one associated with your problem. Screen saver problems should be affected by the system preferences, so try deleting this:
com.apple.systempreferences.plist
com.apple.systempreferences.plist.lockfile
Note that when you delete system file preferences, a restart will be required. For applications, just quit the application before trashing preference files.

How to find out email id from CUA ?

Hi,
I would like to have a list of user id with email from CUA. Is there any table/report from where I can get both ?
All users are maintained with user id and email into SU01.
Thanks...

Hi Prashant,
To make it even more easy I would suggest that you use transaction SQVI. I tried it for this issue and it worked. I plan to use it now for other similar queries. In SQVI you can define a join of USR21 and ADR6 tables and construct a query around it which would get you the data easily.
Please follow the following steps for this:
1. Go to transaction SQVI.
2. Give the query name as Z*....
3. Now press the create button.
4. Give a title of your choice and in data source choose TABLE JOIN option. Choose Basis Mode option as well.Press enter.
5. Now you come to the Join Definition Screen. Choose insert table and then choose ADR6 and USR21. After this go back.
6. Now choose List fld. select TABSTRIP. From available fields option move
User name in user master record and Internet mail (SMTP) address to Fields in list. This will define out output fields.
7. Choose SELECTION FIELDS tabstrip. Here move the value User name in user master record from available fields to Selection fields.
8. Save the entries.
9. Execute the query and give user ids of your choice and check for the output.
Let me know if it worked for you!!. Please award points accordingly.
Regards.
Ruchit.

How to find history of CUA setup and usage

Hi there,
A client is asking me to find out who connected a satellite system to the CUA system, and then who deleted it again. Does anyone know where to find this history of CUA setup? Transaction SCUL doesn't help, as the satellite system says it isn't part of any CUA, and on the CUA system itself SCUL doesn't show anything for the sat. system. Anyone have any ideas?

Hi,
I don't think that there are some logs available. the only thing I can imagine is to find out, who connected a client to the cua-master.
Start WE20->partnertype LS>select chidl system>open userclone>change to tab 'Post processing: permitted agents'. In the agents-field you should find the user who connected that child (generated partner profile).
Normally it is forgotten to remove the we20-entries after deletion of the cua-model, so this information should be still available. then interview that user about when,what,how,why,...
b.rgds, Bernhard.

CUA: One or more errors occurred while checking the status of Windows Firewall on the cluster nodes

Cluster with 2 hosts 2012 R2
Scheduled CAU fails with:
CAU run {4EFE116C-AB49-456D-8EED-F7EDC764DA49} on cluster Cluster1 failed. Error Message:One or more errors occurred while checking the status of Windows Firewall on the cluster nodes. Review the errors for more information on how to resolve the problems.
Error Code:-2146233088 Stack:   at MS.Internal.ClusterAwareUpdating.Util.<CheckFirewallsAsync>d__3a.MoveNext()
--- End of stack trace from previous location where exception was thrown ---
   at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter.ThrowForNonSuccess(Task task)
   at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter.HandleNonSuccessAndDebuggerNotification(Task task)
   at Microsoft.ClusterAwareUpdating.Commands.InvokeCauRunCommand.<_ProcessCluster>d__78.MoveNext()
If I run CAU "Analyze Readiness" ALL comes as PASS
If I run CUA by hand on same hosts with NO change to the system (not even reboot) it finishes OK
Anybody any ideas?
Thanks
Seb

Hi,
In some case if you disabled the connection in Windows firewall inbound of
"Cluster aware updating" service it will can’t use the CAU.
More information:
Starting with Cluster-Aware Updating: Self-Updating
http://blogs.technet.com/b/filecab/archive/2012/05/17/starting-with-cluster-aware-updating-self-updating.aspx
What is Cluster Aware Updating in Windows Server 2012? (Part 1)
http://blogs.technet.com/b/mspfe/archive/2013/02/06/what-is-cluster-aware-updating-in-windows-server-2012.aspx
Cluster-Aware Updating Overview
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh831694.aspx
Hope this helps.
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

Contact Person for Vendor in SRM/CUA

Hello SRM Expert,
We are using Central user administration (CUA and like other system SRM is connected to CUA. I am getting the error 'Central system not accessible' while creating the employee (manage business partner) for business partner (Vendor). When we remove CUA then the error disappear.
Could you please let us know would be our approach for creating employee for vendors (for bidding, auction etc..).
Steps for Reconstruction
1. Login to SRM
2. Click on Manage business partner (BBPMAININT)
3. Look for Employee for Business Partner 'Create' option and create a employee for one of the vendors.
4. You will get the message Central 'System not accessible' .
I know one approach where I can create a SU01 in advance from CUA and then in manage business partner use this user but this is very long approach looking at the number of vendors we have. Is there a simpler way ?
Thanks,

Pradeep
Sorry yes it is not specifically about external users. You should review the note again, particularly scenario 2.
Essentially the note explains that, in a CUA environment, to create a user for an external contact person you need to create the following entry in table "BBP_CUST":
Key = "EBP_CUA_SCENARIO"; Value = "ACTIVE".
If you do not want to user table maintenance you can create the entry via the following IMG menu path:
Supplier Relationship Management > SRM Server > Technical Basic Settings >
Deactivate User Access to Solution Manager.
(Ignore the transaction title this transaction is essenatially maintenance of table "BBP_CUST").
Then you must ensure that the user specified on the RFC Definition for the CUA client has authorisations to create users IN THE CUA CLIENT, (it already has authorisations to create in the SRM client). This lack of authorisation is probably the reason for your error message.
Mike

Why CUA (Release 7.00) is Not Working with Old Clients(Release 4.6C, 4.5B)?

Hi all,
We have CUA (release 7.00) that is not working with older release clients. I implemented 2 release 7.00 clients to CUA; they both work fine. However, when I implement some older release clients (like, 4.5B, 4.6C, 6.20 and 6.40) to CUA, I can only create ID and pull out to client, but roles do not go through.
It is kind of argent.
Do anyone know how to fix it????
Thank you for reading this.

> It is kind of argent.
I think you meant "ardent"...
THe word u r g e n t is blocked by our content filters, because a while back everything was like that and these forums are actually discussion forums...
Anyway, sounds like faulty config or perhaps a problem with logical system assignment.
Have you checked that? Also check in SCUL?
That you can create users but not assign roles might also be that in the lower release systems they are checking activity 22 (assighn) AND 02 (change) to assign the role. Doesn't make sense, really....
Check the drop down menu in table PRGN_CUST for the option to change this, and compare whether the settings are different.
Cheers,
Julius
Edited by: Julius Bussche on Jul 30, 2009 11:34 PM

Integrate GRC 10.1 with CUA and how to import roles from CUA & Child systems into GRC for provisioning

Hello,
I am trying to integrate CUA into our GRC 10.1 system through the below steps and so far I have completed the below steps following SAP Notes 1680108 and 1616121:
1. Connected CUABOX to GRCBOX like a plug-in system.
2. Updated CUA Global System and CUA Model Distribution in Maintain CUA settings under User Provisioning.
3. Next I am trying to import the roles from CUA(CUABOX) into GRC(GRCBOX) to be able to provision roles in CUA Child Systems(ECCBOX).
After reading few discussions in SCN, I have figured that we have to download a template in Role Import and populate it accordingly to upload the CUA child system roles into GRC system for provisioning in CUA Child Systems.
Unfortunately, this template has multiple fields and I am unable to determine the fields that should be populated as CUA Global System and CUA Child System to import into GRC. Also, when we upload CUA Child System Roles template what selections should be made in Role Import window.
Any help in this regard is very helpful.
Thank you,
Pawan

Hi Alessandro,
I have "Create user if does not exist" setting checked for both change action and assign role action and also have CUA enabled. Here is the list of steps that I am performing:
1. Create an access request for new account, T-CUA_CHILD and select a role from a child system ECC Z_ECC_ROLE_IN_CHILD_SYSTEM.
2. Approvals provided to assign the ECC role.
3. I see the following in GRFNMW_DBGMONITOR_WD.
           Auto provisioning activity at end of request at Path GRAC_DEFAULT_PATH and Stage              GRAC_SECURITY
               New User:T-CUA_CHILD created in System(s): ECC (created without role assignments)
               T-CUA_CHILD User does not exist in target system CUA
GRC created an account without role assignment in ECC but also throwed me an error that the user does not exist in CUA.
However, if I select roles from both CUA and ECC it creates the account in both systems with the selected role assignments.
So I am wondering if there is way to provide CUA access to users by default for new account requests types. I have tried setting up default roles for CUA but it does not assign the roles by default until I select the CUA system.
Thank you for your help!
Pawan

How to Configure CUA of SAP R/3 system to Portal System.?

Hi,
can you please explain how to configure CUA of R/3 to UME of Portal

Srikanth,
It depends how is your landscape desigend befor you proceed with CUA, there are many points which you have to consider. refer these liknk.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/3b/68ff407765ed6fe10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
Cheers,
Shaym

Client Delete and Logical System and CUA

I'm getting ready to do some client clean up in prep for an upgrade from ECC 5 to ECC 6 soon.
Currently we have a 3 system landscape: DV1 QA1 PR1
Clients on these systems are as follows: (not including 000, 001, 066)
PR1:100 - the production client
QA1:100 - Integration Master - not used except for RFC connections for Solution Manager
QA1:110 - Cycle 1 testing - not used
QA1:120 - Cycle 2 testing - not used
QA1:200 - Old training master client - not used
QA1:201 - Old training client - not used
QA1:710 - no longer being used for testing
QA1:720 - client used for system and integration testing
DV1:100 - Configuration - not used
DV1:110 - ABAP development
DV1:120 - Configuration
DV1:700 - Template for test - not used
DV1:710 - Test with prod data
Most have a logical system defined for the client.
I am going to delete those I've underlined above as they are no longer used.
Some of these are setup in the CUA system.
All are showing up in Solution Manager SMSY system landscape.
My plan is to backup the system database first!
Then:
1) Delete the client(s) (SCC5) one by one
2) Remove the client from CUA (SCUA)
3) Remove the logical name (SALE)
What I am unsure about is the order of the process. Should the CUA and ALE modifications come before actually deleting the client?
Does this sound like a reasonable plan to clean up our client landscape?
Thanks in advance for your suggestions and help.
Laurie McGinley

Dear Laurie,
Order should be like below:
1) Remove the client from CUA (SCUA)
2) Delete the client(s) (SCC5) one by one
3) Remove the logical name (SALE)
More over you should delete these clients from Solution Manager also inorder not to have error message when you go to solution Manager for doing anything on that system.
Please revert back for any queries.
Regards
Shailesh Mamidwar

Logical system name vs. destination name - CUA -

Hey experts,
at the moment I´m thinking about using the CUA in our SAP environment for role distribution.
In this scenario I need destinations to the child systems (of course!). In all manuals I found it say, that i HAVE to create destinations which have the same name as the logical system. However, this is not possible cause this is against corporate name conventions.
So I tried to use different destination names, but when I use the function "text comparison" (SU01->Roles) it always fails and says that the destination to the child system is missing.
So here my question: How can I tell the CUA not to search for destinations named like the logical system????
Thx in advance, nice weekend
Oliver

Hey John,
piece of cake ;).. that's what I thought at first. Unfortunately it´s not that easy. This is because of partially really strict restrictions within the SAP-Software.
At the one Module, you can choose the destination, is used for a particular group of functions. At the next, you simply can´t. SAP says "you need to have a destination, named as the logical system name". And there is no way around.
Maybe I´am the first guy being disturbed by this "feature"....
Of cause, I already placed several posts within the basis section... but still.. no way around. In one case I even opened a ticket at SAP... (I already posted the answer above) ....
Thx anyways!
Oliver

Logical System is not in the list of CentralSystem(CUA)

Hi,
I am trying to create Central User Administration (CUA) in my landscape.
CentralSystem:-
I was created one client 007 with user name CUA_ADM as Administrator and i have been defined a logicalsystem and assigned to it and created RFC connecitons to clients in childsystem.
ChildSystems:-
In this way in child systems also created users, RFC connections and define logicalsystem and assigned to clients.
1) My problem is i am trying to use transaction SCUA in that these logical system of child system is not available.
2) The logical system that is assigned for local clients is available after choosing those logicalsystems it giving error message like cannot reach system PRDCLNT000 by RFC
Any one please give me the suggestions regarding how to solve it.
Thanks,
Vivek . Nellore
Edited by: vivek.nellore on Mar 17, 2008 4:54 PM

Hi Vivek,
Please ensure that RFC destinations named same as the logical systems of child clients are created in master client.These RFC destination will be of type 3 and will point out to thee respective child clients. Similarily you may also create an RFC destination corresponding to master client in the child clients.
While it is not necessary to have 1:1 relationship in naming of RFC destination and logical systems it makes the job very easy. Other wise you need to check for ports involved in respective partner profiles(WE20) and then make sure that the ports are pointing to correct RFC destinations(which will be checked using WE21).
Regards.
Ruchit.

CUA ?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for