Current Setting in Collection Mgt Authorization should give to User?

Hi All,
In SAP Easy access of collection management current setting three T.codes - UDM_STRATEGY - Strategies , UDM_GROUP - Groups, UDM_GROUP2SGMT - Assign Groups to Segments.
when these T.codes we are using and saving the activities system prompt customization request, should give authorization to user?
Regards
Arun

Hi Arun,
The Tcodes you have mentioned are solely the function of a Collection supervisor and not team members. However, if you still want to give limited access then consider the below points for individual Tcodes -
UDM_GROUP - Out of the 3 mentioned above, you may want to give this T-code to team members only for assigning substitute person in case somebody is absent. You can look at transaction variant (SHD0) to make other screens as display only.
UDM_GROUP2SGMT - This is not required on a daily basis and authorization can be left with the IT team only.
UDM_STRATEGY - This is best handled by the Collection Supervisor or Team Lead of AR and care must be taken that there are no logical misses in the rules.
Regards,
Abhishek Jain

Similar Messages

AC 5.3 CUP - authorization for CUP's users

Dear Friends,
We are trying to see what are the authorizations that we should give the users who are going to use the CUP system.
We have some users who are approvers. We want to give them the authorizations maintain and view only the request that they are involved in.
As far as we can see, according to the default approver role, the approver can view all requests in the reports - not only those that he is involved in.
could any one support this issue ?
Thanks
Yudit

Hi Yudit,
The ViewApprove action will allow a person to view the approve button.
When the user logged into the CUP system he can see request which is assigned to him in Request for Approval screen.
He can search request in Search Request screen which are not assigned to him and he can't approve those request.
So what is the problem of giving the Approve button to approvers.
Regards,
Sudip.

Guys ... I have a 2008 MacPro running the current Yosemite. I also have installed the sound amp called "BOOM!" I have the Sound set to Line Out which should have the computer boot up to BOOM! Instead, it boots up to the Internal speaker. What's up?

Hi Folks ...
I have a 2008 MacPro running the current Yosemite. I have installed the recommended upgraded video card, but the sound is as it was new. I also have installed the sound amp/graphic equalizer called "BOOM!" I have the Sound set to Line Out which should have the computer boot up automatically to BOOM! and thus to the external speakers. Instead, it boots up to the Internal speaker. According to the folks at "BOOM!", this is happening to others who have similar Macs. They can't find any explanation within BOOM!, so I am turning to you all. Any ideas?

Hi Kappy ...
Sorry, I guess I didn't state the problem very well.
I don't want the computer to boot up to the internal speaker. I want it to boot up to the external speakers. However, even though System Preferences is set on Line Out, when the computer boots up or reboots, it erroneously goes to internal speaker. So, every time I boot up, I have been going to System Preference/Sound and clicking on Line Out. From that point on, everything is OK until the next boot up. It is a small annoyance, but annoying all the less. The simple explanation seems to be that when the computer is shut down, it does not hold the setting for Line Out and resets itself to Internal Speaker. How do I change that behavior and get it to go to Line Out whenever it boots up?

Equals() in Sets and Collections

It is a common knowledge that Collection per se are not supposed to have equals() method: first, comparing two bags (multisets) is too costly, second, comparing a Collection to a List may lead to ignoring the List order - the same elements but in different order is a different List, right?
Then I have a question: why does SortedSet have equals() method? It is definitely not just a Map, but a decorator; the order can be different. It is obviously an error.
Unlike the other clumsy feature:
Map<String> m1 = new HashMap();
Map<String> m2 = new HashMap();
m1.put("k", "v");
m2.put("k", "v");
m1.equals(m2); // returns true
m1.values().equals(m2.values()); // returns false - there is a long explanation why
Another, unrelated, observation.
String[] a1 = new String[] {"a", "b"};
String[] a2 = new String[] {"a", "b"};
a1.equals(a2); // returns false - bad, bad, bad implementation!
Arrays.asList(a1).equals(Arrays(asList(a2)); // returns true - way to go!

In which case my response is: It is?I think so. I can't say I've taken a survey, but I doubt that it's "common knowledge" that collections shouldn't override equals.
Otherwise you would end up comparing
Lists and Sets.Not if you follow the documented contracts.
the List order - the same elements but indifferent
order is a different List, right?List's equals contract requires that equals return
true iff the other object is also List and hasthe
same elements (by the elements' equals methods) in
the same order. You are repeating my explanation, are not you?No. I'm pointing out what you seem to have missed--that if you follow the documented contracts, there won't be a problem.
If you're aware of that and I missed you point, perhaps you could try to clarify what you're getting at?
Then I have a question: why does SortedSet have
equals() method? It is definitely not just aMap,
but
a decorator; the order can be different. It is
obviously an error.Set's equals contract only requires that the other
object also be a Set and that the two Sets contain
the same elements. Wrong. I mean, an ordered set is not equivalent to a
set. In your mind it is not. In the view taken by the collections framework, it can be. Neither view is inherently correct or wrong. I've never been in a situation to compare a SortedSet to a non-sorted Set (as far as I know), but I have compared Sets, and my own needs didn't care whether neither, one, or both of the Sets was sorted. So in the cases where I've compared Sets, the current definition has worked for me. I suppose there are cases where it doesn't work.
It has an additional structure: the order. Two
different ordered sets can have the same elements, it
does not mean they are the same. There's nothing inherent about equals() that says it has to compare every attribute or every structural aspect of the objects being compared.
It's math.But this is Java, which is intended to model certain mathematical concepts to a certain degree, but not necessarily to be perfectly faithful to them.
>
>
I suppose you could argue that for
SortedSets, order should matter for equality, buta)
I don't see any real benefit to it and b) You then
wouldn't be able to compare SortedSets to otherSets,
so the specific implementation would matter(unlike
for Maps and Lists).Well, here we are getting closer to the paradox. Of
course it would be interesting to compare SortedSets
as if they were ordinary Sets, and compare them to
Sets as well.As I said, I haven't knowingly done so, but I was glad that I didn't have to care whether they were sorted.
How about Lists? We may be interested in comparing
them too, ignoring the order. A List is an ordered
multiset. Why not compare Lists and Sets, as
Collections? I would not object - but the problem
lies somewhere deeper. Do you know where?I don't know that there is a problem. I'm not saying the current equals contracts are perfect, or that an objective "best" contract can be defined. But in my experience they have served well whenever I've needed them. I think they're a reasonable, practical compromise.
Weird. What is that explanation?values() returns a virtual Collection, a view that
has only an iterator which scans EntrySet and returns
Map.Entry.getValue().Okay. Still not sure why that would return false, but I'm not able to focus on it that much at the moment.
Yeah, I always thought it was odd that arrays'equals
methods didn't behave more like List's. I imagine
there's a reason for it, owing to how the array
classes are created, but still...What could be the reason? I'm just curious, that's
why I started this philosophical thread. :)I don't know, but one thing that's odd about arrays. There's no such class as MyClass[] until I create MyClass. Then MyClass[] magically comes into existence (or maybe the first time I use it). That makes the array classes different from other classes. I imagine it would have been possible to have them provide their own equals() that compares elements, but presumably it was deemed more difficult or complex or error-prone than the perceived value it would add.

SOBJ current setting (oss note 135028, 77430)

Hi all,
I'm working in a ECC6 R/3 system.
In according with sap notes 135028 and 77430 I would modify standard current setting for some views used in customizing transaction.
Reading note 135028 I follow the indicated solution :
"...open the IMG and display the IMG structure. Position the cursor
on the corresponding IMG activity and select the menu path "Edit -> Display
IMG activity". On the following screen, select the Tab "Maint.objects". A
list of the assigned Customizing objects is displayed. By double-clicking
on the corresponding row, navigate to the Customizing object and set the
Indicator "Current settings" directly......."
At this point the system requires to entry a key for standard object modification.
Is it allowed from sap to modify this kind of object?
My boss asked me to show him a script from sap where it's clear that it's a normal activity to change a standard object in this cases.
Can anyone help me?
Thanks in advance.
S.M.

OB52 need not be made available to users. There are alternative transactions in SAP Easy Access to achieve the same functionality ready-to-use.
One such txn is S_ALR_87003642.
Try it, and if it suits your purpose ask your BASIS team to give users access to this txn. That should do it.
If you are in the mood to explore, another (a little more sophisticated) option is S_PEN_05000130.
Thanks
Gulshan

FSCM Collections mgt

Hi All,
My client in 4.6 has written a custom process to deal with "Dealer Warranty claims". Currently the custom process will clear multiple open items in a customers account (debits and credits) and create one open item (Post with Clearning). If there is a balance due to the dealer, etc, they have the ability to create a clear a portion of the single open item with a payment and create a residual item that is blocked until the next pass of the custom process.
We are thinking if FSCM can be implemented to replace this custom process. What we have in mind is -
AR pushes all the open items to FSCM collection mgt by activtaing the interface and having all the config in place. By adding a column "partial payment" (to modify the pymnt amount) to customer worklist and then have a RFC connection back to F110 to make the pymnt based on the amount adjusted in worklist.
Is it possible to build a RFC connection from worklist that is Collections mgt to AP - F110 run. It is basically building from AR to AP. If yes, what would be the complexity of doing it and maintaining this way?
Please let me know how this works. We have been struggling with this for past few months.
Regards,
Satya

Thank you all for your responses.
I understand that the standard process of FSCM does not provide this. We are thinking of customizing it anyway. Now we have to decide if the customization is client As-Is process in New system or FSCM customization.
I want to know if the following customization is possible in FSCM and it's complexity -
1. AR pushes open items to FSCM Collections mgt
2. In FSCM, in Worlist under Payments tab, I can add new column "New Payment amount" which allows user to modify/adjust the actual payment
3. With enhancement, this modified amount in the Worlist should be posted back to AR as open item and remaining amount as residual item.
4. The open item will be automatically picked by F110.
For better understanding, example - if the open item sent from AR to FSCM is $100. In the "New Payment amount" column, I will enter $40 (client wants to pay only $40 to dealer for warranty). Then this $40 should be posted back as an open item in AR with $60 residual amount with blocked status.
Does this scenario work? A lot of customization and enhancement is required though, but just want to know if it works in FSCM and it's complexity of work?
I really appreciate your time and help on this. I need all your expertise in this area.
Regards,
Satya

Can a batch file be written to check status of Wifi adapter? Then as outcome change it to the opposite current setting?

Hi all,
Is it possible to have a batch file check the status (Enabled/Disabled) of a wireless adapter and as an outcome have it change the adapters setting to the opposite of it's current setting?
i.e. If set as ENABLED, it will disable it as an outcome.
If set as DISABLED, it will enable it as an outcome.
Thanks as this would be extremely useful to overcome a recent problem with Windows 7 not recognising my dads laptop FN key (aeroplane mode).

Hi all,
I've managed to program 2 batch files (one enables and the other disables):
ENABLE WIFI =
@echo off
echo Please wait ... enabling wireless adapter ...
netsh interface set interface "Wireless Network Connection" ENABLE
echo Your wireless network adapter should now be enabled.
timeout/t 10
DISABLE WIFI =
@echo off
echo Please wait ... disabling wireless adapter ...
netsh interface set interface "Wireless Network Connection" DISABLE
echo Your wireless network adapter should now be disabled.
timeout/t 10
These both work perfectly on my Windows 7 laptop. 8)
HOWEVER ... I'd like to code a single batch file which first checks the connect status of the wireless adapter and then through a IF statement sets the opposite outcome to the current status.
I'm not entirely sure how to code this though. :oops:
I know ... netsh interface show interface name="Wireless Network Connection" ... provides the connection status with "Connect State".
What is the syntax I should use to lookup this connect state value?

How to retain current set of records in advanced table in OAF

I have an advanced table in a OAF page. Number of records displayed is set to 5. Now, when I have more than 5 records, we can view the next set of records using navigation buttons of the advanced table. One of its column is an image which has "Action Type" as "fireAction" and "Submit" set to "True", which when clicked displays further details about the selected record in a separate region. However, in this process the page is getting refreshed and the table is again displaying the first set of 5 records even if i chose to display details about record in the next set of 5 (i.e after navigating using "Next 5" button of the table).
Is there any way to retain the current set of records displayed in the advanced table across the page refresh.?
Thanks
Nagamanoj

Solved.
Somewhere in our code, while populating one of the columns of the table, we were resetting the VO which was causing the issue. Modified that method call to add a parameter to mention from which row should the table be populated.
Thanks
Nagamanoj

Filtering a set of collections using JSTL

Hi, i am currently facing a problem where i tried to query a set of collections in JSTL. My 1st query is using date for example,
<sql:setDataSource var="ds" driver="com.microsoft.sqlserver.jdbc.SQLServerDriver" url="jdbc:sqlserver://192.168.250.86:1223;DatabaseName=eleavedb;SelectMethod=cursor" user="sa" password="sapassword"/>
<sql:query var="countLeave" dataSource="${ds}">
SELECT * FROM VCST_EMPLOYEE_LEAVE WHERE leave_from LIKE 'May 31 2006%'
<sql:param value="${dates}%" />
</sql:query>
After querying through date, i need to query these collection of data based on its type. But, my problem is....how to do it? This is because it's type is not unique.

You may try the paging taglib ...
http://www.servletsuite.com/servlets/pagertag.htm

Should Give Error Message

Hi all
Purchasing organization 001 assigned to company code 001,
when user want to create Vendor with P.Org 001 and comapny code 002
the system should give error message
During Vendor creation ,if the wrong purchase organisation is selected, system is allowing to create the vendor master.
Even though ,I have done the Setting in the following , the error message is not reflectiog
1. Message Control for Vendor Master Data
2.T.code : OBMSG
3.T.code : OBA5
Kinldy let me know the steps if possible let me know userexit to solve this......
Thanks & Regards
chand

Hi,
In the exit FM EXIT_SAPMF02K_001 you have your company code and Purch. Org. in the following fields:
I_LFB1-BUKRS (Company Code the vendor is being created in)
I_LFM1-EKORG (Purch. Org the vendor is being created in)
Having above, you can check in the table T024E ( here you have assignment of Purchasing Org to Company Code) if there is assignment between Purch. Org and Company Code.
Hope it helps.
Regards,
w.

Doing GR for a material type, system should give a message like QI required

Dear Friends
While doing MIGO(GR) for a material type, system should give a message like Quality Inspection required
but Client requirement is not to maintain QM view or Inspection Type 01for material type
Any setting required
Thanks & Regards
Gajendranath

Hi
Please check user exit QBCK0003 |Extended QM check for goods receipt
Regards
sujit

A server error occurred on the current command. the results if any should be discarded in SQL 2008 R2

Hi,
I am using SQL server 2008 R2 and also MultipleActiveResultSet = true and Pooling = true (default value) in connection string.
While executing query 'IF ORIGINAL_LOGIN() = SUSER_SNAME() EXECUTE AS USER = 'MyUser'', I received error stating 'A server error occurred on the current command. the results if any should be discarded'. At the same time I could check that SqlConnection
state is also closed.
I have also fired 'REVERT' query If I find such exception and again try to execute same query again. but no luck. I received the same exception while executing query (Execute As) again.
What can be the solution to avoid such exception and make my code working?
Thanks,
Ashish

Login failed for user 'sa'. The user is not associated with a trusted SQL Server connection.
Above issue occurs genrally when authentication mode is set to Windows Authentication insted Mixed Mode.
You can change the authentication mode of the SQL server from “Windows Authentication Mode (Windows Authentication)” to “Mixed Mode (Windows Authentication and SQL Server Authentication)”.
Run following script in SQL Analyzer to change the authentication
LOGIN sa ENABLE
GO
ALTER LOGIN sa WITH PASSWORD = '<password>'
GO
http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2007/04/14/sql-server-fix-error-18452-login-failed-for-user-null-the-user-is-not-associated-with-a-trusted-sql-server-connection/
But as per the first post it seems issue is different have you observerd Error log?
Check out at C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\MSSQL.n\MSSQL\LOG\ERRORLOG
Location might differ as per the Server configration
Please click the Mark as answer button and vote as helpful if this reply solves your problem

When i insert my sim card the message is showing this iphone is not currently set up to work with carrier

My iphone 4 is not working when i insert the sim message is showing that the iphone is not currently set up to work with carrier or request that this iphone be unlocked? what i have to do.. help please?

To use a sim from a carrier, other than the carrier your phone is locked to, requires that your phone be officially unlocked. The only way to accomplish that is to contact the carrier your phone is currently locked to & request that they authorize the phone's official unlocking.

After updating to 4.0 stable today, FF reports it is in offline mode and can't open pages! I've checked the work offline boolean in about:config, it is set to false as it should be. !?!?

After updating to 4.0 stable today, FF reports it is in offline mode and can't open pages! I've checked the work offline boolean in about:config, it is set to false as it should be. !?!?

What in particular didn't you like about Firefox 6?
You can undo a lot of changes, either via changing settings or prefs on the <b>about:config</b> page or via extensions.
*https://support.mozilla.com/kb/common-questions-after-updating-firefox
Do a clean reinstall of the version that you want to use.
Download a fresh Firefox copy and save the file to the desktop.
*Firefox 3.6.x: http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all-older.html
*Firefox 6.0.x: http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all.html
* Uninstall your current Firefox version.
* Do not remove personal data when you uninstall the current version or you lose your bookmarks and other data in the profile folder.
Remove the Firefox program folder before installing that newly downloaded copy of the Firefox installer.
* It is important to delete the Firefox program folder to remove all the files and make sure that there are no problems with files that were leftover after uninstalling.
Your bookmarks and other profile data are stored elsewhere in the Firefox Profile Folder and won't be affected by a reinstall, but make sure that you do not select to remove personal data if you uninstall Firefox.
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_folder_-_Firefox
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_backup

Sales Order : Unit Price U_MRP it should give Error Message

Hi All,
I am using SBO 2005 B PL 25.
When the user add SO, and select the items and update the field of Unit Price and press Tab it should match Unit Price with one another UDF U_MRP. If Unit Price is > then U_MRP then it should give me error message and cursor should go back to Unit Price.
Is it possible through using SBO_SP_TransactionNotification or any other way.
Best Regards,
Chintesh Soni

Hi Istvan,
I have selected the type of UDF is Units and Total -> Amount.
Below is the full SP_TransactionNotification procedure..
USE [TEST_DB_190808_MRP_Excise]
GO
/****** Object: StoredProcedure [dbo].[SBO_SP_TransactionNotification]    Script Date: 08/21/2008 18:00:07 ******/
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
ALTER proc [dbo].[SBO_SP_TransactionNotification]
@object_type nvarchar(25),                     -- SBO Object Type
@transaction_type nchar(1),               -- [A]dd, <u>pdate, [D]elete, [C]ancel, C[L]ose
@num_of_cols_in_key int,
@list_of_key_cols_tab_del nvarchar(255),
@list_of_cols_val_tab_del nvarchar(255)
AS
begin
-- Return values
declare @error int                    -- Result (0 for no error)
declare @error_message nvarchar (200)           -- Error string to be displayed
--select @error = 0
--select @error_message = N'Ok'
--     ADD     YOUR     CODE     HERE
IF @transaction_type = 'A' AND @object_type = '17'
BEGIN
If exists
(Select t.Price From RDR1 t
   Where t.Price > t.U_mrp
     and t.DocEntry=@list_of_cols_val_tab_del)
begin
SET @error = 1 --10
SET @error_message = N'Errorr text '
end
END
-- Select the return values
end
With Warm Regards,
Chintesh Soni

Current Setting in Collection Mgt Authorization should give to User?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for