Cursor image export

When I export the graph image to a file I lose the cursor list. Is there any way to preserve the cursor list in the image file of the graph?
If no what is the best way of getting an image of the graph and the cursor list in one file, programmatically?
I'm currently using the property node of "export image" to write to file.
Also is there a way to change the column header titles in the cursor list?
Message Edited by sadeghi on 02-23-2007 05:43 PM

In case someone is interested, I've found that you have to use the "get Image" method, and save the data using the graphic format Vi's.

Similar Messages

  • Get Rid of the Text-as-Image Export

    For the life of me I can't figure out why Adobe would add such an irritating feature and not allow it to be toggled.
    Come on Adobe developers, exercise some intelligence here.
    I am aware there are potential licensing issues but let's review:
    You cannot use system fonts that are not considered 'web safe' without them exporting as image, even though 99% of Windows users will have them and Mac users will have no trouble with them being substituted.
    It makes manual CSS font stacks useless since Muse abandons this possibility when it goes the image route.
    There are plenty of TypeKit fonts available through Creative Cloud that are accessible when synced, yet many of them are not in Muse's library so will also force image export. If it synced through CC and is licensed for web use then there are no licensing issues. Export as text and let the user drop in their TypeKit code.
    Many users will use Google/Typekit web fonts perfectly fine but downloading and self-hosting the font files just to use them in Muse is a waste of time and not necessarily possible.
    The workaround is to use a completely different font, thus upsetting the page layout, just so that it exports as text and a simple find and replace can be used to change font-family.
    I can't even use Open Sans without it exporting as an image. Seriously? Likely the most widespread web font in existence and you force an image export. That's just bad.
    Please get rid of this... allow users to turn image exports off and handle font styling ourselves or remove it entirely.
    It was fine beforehand when you could use any font installed locally, including CC synced Typekit fonts, with only the Muse fonts triggering placing of a Muse Typekit code.
    This resulted in users having to intervene post-export to have web fonts render properly if they weren't available through Muse which was perfectly reasonable.

    Feature Requests
    1. Provide access to the complete Typekit font offering.
    2. Provide the ability to define and use your own font fallback stacks (aka Web Safe font definitions)
    Possible Misconceptions
    1. Open Sans isn't readily available as a Web Font in Muse
    2. We've changed something in the generated code that makes it more difficult to manually edit the output.
    You're correct. The paid Typekit library is not currently easily available from within Muse. We continue to lobby the Typekit team for changes required to enable paid Typekit in a seamless UI within Muse, but thus far we have yet to reach the top of their development team's priority list.
    If you're familiar with font stacks you're aware there are very few truly "web safe" fonts. In most cases using a "web safe" font means settling for one of a handful of fonts depending on the OS or device being used to view your site. That font variation means variations in the line breaks within text frames and thus changes to text frame heights which are likely to result in changes to the overall layout of your pages. In most cases a Web Font is a much better choice if the visual fidelity of your design is an important part of your site. It's unlikely Muse will provide the ability to define arbitrary font stacks. Given the target market of Muse and our small development team, future additional font support will likely continue to be in the area of Web Fonts.
    If you select "Add Web Fonts" in the Web Fonts section of the Fonts menu you can browser a library of 500+ font families that are provided for free and hosted on Adobe's Typekit service. This set of free fonts is marketed as "Edge Web Fonts." The Edge Web Fonts offering started as the set of public domain fonts hosted by Google with a small number removed due to quality issues and a small number added from the set of fonts Adobe wholly owns. The majority of the ~650 web fonts now hosted by Google are part of the 500+ web fonts readily available within Muse.
    Open Sans is one of the font families in the Edge Web Fonts library. Go to "Add Web Fonts" in the Fonts menu, type "open" in the search field of the Web Fonts dialog, click on Open Sans and it will be added to the Web Fonts section of your Muse Font menu for easy future use. On your site the font will be provided via Typekit without any page view limits or requirement to be a Creative Cloud subscriber.
    To my knowledge there have not been any changes in Muse output that should impact your ability to use a Web Safe font in Design view, then alter the generated code to replace that font with a font from some other source (i.e. paid Typekit, Fonts.com hosting, etc.). It's never been possible to use a System Font in Muse and then alter the output code to replace the font, since the output for a text frame that uses a System Font has always been an image.
    Thank you for taking the time to voice your opinions and provide feature requests.

  • Still images exported to DVD look deinterlaced and flicker on TV monitor

    Hi,
    I have tried tried almost everything and I still have issues with the still images exported to DVD as sequencefrom FCP 7.0 by using Compressor are deinterlaced and flicker on TV monitor. Please help remove the annoying flicker.
    My FCP Timeline Sequence settings match the image resolution:
    Frame Size: 1024 x 682 (double of 720 x 480 standard DVD res)
    Pixel Aspect Ratio: Square
    Field Dominance: None
    Compressor: Photo JPG (also tried, DVCPRO-NTSC)
    I cropped the original images in Photoshop to the 1024 x 682 and saved as tiffs. They still look deinterlaced in FCP timeline and exported to DVD on my iMac computer monitor.
    Final output of DVD will be on this monitor:
    Specifications:
    Ikegami
    Model: VCM-2101
    Resolution: 450 TV Lines (Horizontal)
    Should I crop the images to 450 horizontal pixels or the double of that 900?
    How can I match the sequence or the images settings to avoid the flicker and deinterlaced look on that monitor? I am not able to test the image by having the monitor next to computer.
    Compressor:
    I used custom DVD settings in Compressor for 90 min best quality DVD. Tried the Porgressive and "Same as Source" in Output field.
    In "Crop to" and "Padding" I set for preserve source aspect ratio and letterbox area of source.
    I followed the advices from below and I still did not resolve the problem. Please is there anythign else I can try?
    Thanks a lot..
    Re: Poor Quality Stills
    Dec 19, 2006 4:08 PM (in response to Steve Braker)
    Things to try (In increasing order of image degradation)
    - (in FCP) field order>none
    - (in FCP or Photoshop) reduce whites by 10% - reduces overly bright areas
    - (in FCP) flicker filter - minimum
    - (in Photoshop) motion blur>vertical> .2 - .5 pixels - blurs vertically only
    - (In FCP or Photoshop) Gaussian blur> .2 - .5 pixels -blurs both horizontally as well as vertically
    - (in FCP or Photoshop) deinterlace - throws away half the image and is generally not appropriate on scanned images

    Dear Russ,
    Thank you very much. Yes, there is something else in the sequence, old documentary, 768 x 570 (no field dominance, 25fps, Apple ProRes 422) but the images are more imporant.
    make a progressive sequence with  square pixels. (I am partial to 720P, 1080 should work – or 540). Choose Pro Res 422
    Do you mean that I should make a sequence in FCP with these settings? If yes, how can I set a "progressive" sequence? I dont see a setting for output field in FCP sequence settings, lnly in customizing Compressor output DVD format.
    Also: "720P, 1080 should work – or 540" are you talking about Frame size? If so, to set in Compressor or in FCP?
    If you have interlaced material, then de-interlace before you bring it in. If you don't have interlaced clips, don't de-interlace.
    The images are not interlaced after  I crop them, apply motion blur filter in Photoshop but look interlaced in FCP timeline after I import them and even to the same as photos sequence in FCP timeline.
    Please help and thank you for your comments.

  • Could work an animated flash bitmap image exported in html 5, in DPS ?

    I'm new in DPS, just started for a couple of weeks and I need to use a image in an animation.
    I created the animation in inDesign exported in .fla, used de toolkit js, load it in a container with web content overlay, and when I preview it with Adobe Content Viewer it doesn't work, it apears a blank screen. Neighter of animation from that stage won't work.
    To be very precise any animation works fine, when I test the html in a browser, the problem appears only in the content viewer.
    The animation is very simple: smal logo entering in the stage from the right, not very complex.
    I tried in flash with other images in a test file and loaded in inDesign, and still don't work. Other vector animation works well, no problem. I saw that if I have an image in library in flash and export a simple animation with a vector ball, won't work in indesign preview, with content viewer.
    My question is, Could work an animated flash bitmap image exported in html 5, in DPS ?  If so, what should I need to do ?
    Thank you in advance.

    Two possible solutions I was considering:
    1) In my index/first page, have all the swfs present (scaled to 1x1, behind something, or invisible) and have a preloader code on that first page... so all the content gets loaded before continuing onto the rest of the site.  That would certainly work in making the site run quick... but would mean a relatively lengthy wait at the start.  Luckily, unlike my current site, all the actual site content (aside from the header/nav interface) is HTML... so the bulk of the site's content is in the HTML pages, not as part of the Flash header... so it probably wouldn't be too horrific a wait.  However, it would be loading EIGHT of these swfs, since there are eight pages... so then maybe it would be....
    2) Have an swf that consists of just the 'draw up' of the interface, and it's idle state... then when each button is pressed, load a new swf to replace the main one, which has the specific page's animated title sequence, and ends with the code to load the html page.  So, each separate HTML page would have embedded into it only the main swf, and the title animation swf would be swapped in when a nav button is pressed.  Main issue here is each button press would envoke a preloader sequence (kind of tedious)... and unfortunately all the 'main interface' elements loaded in with the main swf would have to be loaded in again at the start of each animated title swf (although none of the draw up... just the loading of the interface and buttons).  For highspeed users, it should be okay, I guess....
    Thoughts or better ideas?

  • Watermark not showing correctly on image export

    I've come from Aperture 2, and when I exported jpegs I had a small watermark - a 15 x 18 png file - that I added to my exports. When I upgraded to Aperture 3 I did it by creating a new library and importing the Aperture 2 library. My existing image export presets appeared, but with the watermarks missing. I added the watermark using the preset dialog. When I tried to change the position of the watermark in the dialog, the watermark did not move in the preset dialog. When I printed the picture the *watermark was scaled up* to fill the whole picture. This makes the watermark unusable.
    Anyone else come across this? Any work-arounds?

    Same problem here. They really mucked this up.
    It needs to work EXACTLY the way it did in 2.x, because the way they do it now we can't get a pixel for pixel watermark exactly where we had it in 2.x.
    I'm guessing most of us had a fixed size watermark with transparent padding to push it away from the "edges" that it was set to, set to not scale so we had direct control over the WM's size.
    Regardless of how you set it up now, it scales, and you have no control over how much. If I'd have wanted a buggy windows product that knew more about what I wanted to do than I did, I'd have bought Office 2008.

  • PSE 6 with Windows 7  - three cursor images

    This is a new problem.  I have PSE 6 and Windows
    7.  Everytime I use the move tool, it shows up as three cursor images
    on my work page.
    To be sure it isn't the combination of the PSE6 with W/7
    I downloaded PSE 9 trial.
    I am still having the same problem with a fresh new download.
    Anyway to correct this?
    Other tools look normal on the page.
    ~appreciate any help~

    Thank you very much - worked like a charm.
    It is nice to get help, programs can get so frustrating.
    ty

  • How should a custom cursor image be constructed?

    This relates to Java 1.7_u11 and JFX 2.2.4 on Windows 7 64 bit.
    When I set a Node's cursor to Cursor.CROSSHAIR, the crosshair is displayed with complementary colour to its screen background (e.g. black on white, blue on yellow, etc.) However when I construct my own custom crosshair image, 32 pixels square, with transparent-white background pixels and opaque-black crosshair pixels, and create an ImageCursor from it to use as the cursor, it works fine, but always displays as black, irrespective of the background that it's being displayed over. I've tried various ways of creating the image.
    So my question is, is there something special about the built-in Cursor images, and how should we emulate it for an ImageCursor? More generally, how does the 'blend mode' for cursor images work?
    (Apologies if I'm displaying dismaying ignorance here.)

    Hrm, I tried Crosshair on my Linux computer with different background fills in Scene and didn't notice any change in color. It was always a cross with white fill and black outline. I wonder if the appearance of certain cursors are OS specific.
    Anyways, I don't see anything in the documentation to set that. If you want a more customizable cursor, submit an RFE to http://javafx-jira.kenai.com/

  • Have been trying to export versions to a friend in the UK as JPEG. He receives them as bmp and no Metadata. Tried all the JPEG settings in  Image Export with no success.

    Have been trying to export "versions to a friend in the UK as JPEG. He reseives them as bmp with no Metedata. Have tried all the JPEG settings in Image export with no success.
    Nelson

    Ernie-
    Thanks for responding...but still have a oroblem. Here's what I'm doing:
    In Aperture I choose a "version" that has been Adjusted (croped, etc.).
    - Go to "File"...'Export"..."Version"
    - In next window for "Export preset" I choose "JPEG-Fit within 1024x1024"
    - Click on "Export version"
    The exported version then showes up in "Finder" under "Pictures"
    - Next I open "Mail" (version 5.2)
    - Adderss email to friends in England.
    - Click on attachment (paper clip)
    - Choose my "version" from "pictures"
    - Back in Mail, click on "Format"..."Make Plain Text"
    - Send
    My friends receive it as "bmp", not JPEG, with no Metadata.
    If I do the same procedure but under "File" choose "Export Master", they receive it as JPEG and also the Metadata.....BUT, of course, no Adjustments, such as croping, that were made to the "Version".
    What am I doing wrong? Is there any way to save the "Version" as a "Master" and then send it as a "Master"?
    Thanks,
    Nelson

  • LR 2.6 images exported as JPEG cause Photoshop to Crash

    I have just found that if I export an image in jpg format (50% compression) then Photoshop Elements (3, and yes I know it is an old version, but that should not make any difference surely) cannot open that file. Everything is OK if the file is exported as a TIF.
    JPGs exported from LR2.4 are OK.
    Anyone else had this effect?

    Hi SSPrengel
    OK - maybe this will shed some light
    Try changing the size to something very small.- see below
    Try changing the compression. Not affected by the level of Quality (2% 50% or 100%) - all fail to load
    Try changing whether a color-profile is embedded or not. Not an option AFAIK in LR Export
    Try changing if the metadata is minimized or not. Not an option AFAIK in LR Export
    Try changing if the JPGs are exported relative to the source image or some fixed location. Exported to a specific location.
    If I use the Image export resize option it loads OK (resize to 1000*673 from 3916*2634).
    Older exports (from LR2.3 and earlier, of the same size image, and source DNG are OK)
    A centre crop from the Image (1205*691) is OK. A marginal crop (2 edges)  (3838*2552) is OK whereas a very slight crop at (3693*2614) FAILS
    The camera is Leica M8, images is in Leica RAW format (DNG).
    It appears to be function of Image export size (reduced either by Cropping or by 'Resizing on Export'
    Looks like a bug in LR2.6
    Message was edited by: V64
    PS I am using a G5 PowerMac with Tiger OSX

  • Images exported using Leopard are soft compared to Tiger.

    I've been working on exporting images for client preview and noticed that the images I'm exporting under Leopard seem a bit soft. I checked my export settings and everything looks the same as it did under Tiger.
    For comparisons sake, I exported several images that had previously been exported under Tiger and there is a definite difference. Side-by-side, the images exported using Leopard are much softer than the images exported using Tiger. The edits on these images were all previously done using Tiger.
    Has anyone else noticed this?
    I'm using 1.5.6 on 10.5.1.
    Thank you!
    Cheers,
    Anthony
    Message was edited by: Barbatto - Fixed Subject Line

    Janet Taylor wrote:
    Everything looks fine for me from Aperture and LR. I did a clean install of Leopard and all my apps on a Macbook Pro. Are you looking at images in photoshop to compare them? Preview is not a reliable way to check for sharpness right now, since some rocket scientist decide it would be cool if you couldn't scale in set increments anymore, and the randomly scaled rendition can be very soft. As a follow-on to that thought, are the images on your web site displaying at the size you exported them at? If they're being scaled on the web page, and safari is using the same rendering engine as Preview, it's possible that it's making the images look soft.
    hope i said something useful.
    Hi Janet,
    Hmmm, perhaps the fresh install is the way to go? I'm using Photo Mechanic view the exported images, not Preview or Safari. I only mentioned Preview in an earlier thread because in other discussions I've found, Preview appears to exhibit some of the same softness that myself and a few others are experiencing with our Aperture exports.
    Here's a screen grab of two images rendered side-by-side in PhotoMechanic. The top image was exported using Tiger while the bottom image was exported using Leopard. The actual edits on the image (white balance, sharpness, etc) were done previously in Tiger. The only thing I did to the image in Leopard was export it.
    http://www.barbatto.com/misc/comparison.jpg
    In this example, it's pretty obvious that the image exported with Leopard is much softer. Also note that the file size is slightly smaller for the Leopard exported image.
    As for the images on my website, most of them were exported with Aperture under Tiger. Since I've upgraded to Leopard and have been experiencing soft images, I've been using Canon's Digital Photo Professional to export any newer shots I've placed on my site.
    Regarding Lightroom, I installed the trial and its exports were flawless. They don't exhibit any of the softness I am experiencing with Aperture.
    So, right now, I'm at a loss. I experience this softness on both my MacPro and MacBook Pro. It should be noted that both machines were upgraded. Perhaps I should take some time and do a clean install on one of the machines and see if my results are any different. Or keep my fingers crossed that 10.5.2 will solve my problems
    Thanks for your comments!
    Cheers,
    Anthony

  • Oracle Outside In Image Export SDK API - DAInit() crashes

    Hi,
    We use DelayLoad concept to load Oracle Outside In Image Export SDK DLLs when it is required. If the necessary DLLs are not present, the DAInit() function call crashes. Is there any other way that it can throw exception and we can catch it and handle it? Or Is there any other method to detect that the necessary DLLs are not present? Kindly help us in this regard.
    Thanks
    Revathi

    Thank for the update.
    But I know this link and I searched there for Outside In Technology. No match.
    I did try the obvious things, else I wouldn't ask here.
    And what about the broken download ? Does nobody from Oracle read this ? Or does nobody care ? Does anyone know where I can mail the broken link ?
    Regards
    Kai

  • Collaps of notebook during image export after a certain amound of pictures

    When I try to export a bigger collection of pictures, my notebook collapses a getting of after a certain amount of pictures. I have tried it two times and the amount of images when appears the collaps is the same.
    It looks like, that export of images is very limited on my notebook. I am using LR 5.5, the notebook has SSD harddisk with anough free space.
    Has anybody an idea what could by the reason?
    RFA

    Hello dj_paige,
    I made the following two tests:
       1. export of total 276 images, size 4608 x 2592 pix, export to harddisc,
       size after export 4608 x 2592 pix, 240 dpi, 24 dpi, collaps after 123 images
       2. export of total 276 images, size 4608 x 2592 pix, export to harddisc,
       export parameters picture size max 1080x1080 pix, pictures size after
       export 768 x 576 pix, 240 dpi, 24 bit, collaps after 212 elements
    How does the collaps look like: when collaps appears, the power of the
    notebook is just switching off. No error message, no warning - just getting
    OFF. After restart of the notebook, the only hint is, that windows asks
    wheather you will start on normal way or in safety mode. That all.
    According to my opinion, there is a problem like LR handles the RAM. Even I
    would increase the RAM, if I will export accordingly more images, the same
    will happen.
    Regards fom Czech Republic
    RFA
    Reinhold Fr. AUER Dipl. Ing. (FH)
    Chudčice 273
    CZ-664 71 Veverská Bítýška
    telefon: +420 605 553 852
    mail:     [email protected]
    2014-07-01 15:04 GMT+02:00 dj_paige <[email protected]>:
        collaps of notebook during image export after a certain amound of
    pictures  created by dj_paige <https://forums.adobe.com/people/dj_paige>
    in Photoshop Lightroom - View the full discussion
    <https://forums.adobe.com/message/6512897#6512897>

  • Poor quality images exporting from InDesign to PDF

    We are having an issue with poor quality images exporting to PDF from Indesign (CS6). It makes zero difference whether the images are Ai images or PDF. They look perfect in Ai, perfect in the InDesign document, but appalling in the exported PDF. If the PDF document is printed, they print fine, but as a web based pdf document it is not publishable. We must use compression on export to keep the file size small enough for web/email use, but even with compression turned off on export there is no improvement in the PDF quality with a document ten times the size.
    Any help would be appreciated?

    I appear to have answered my own question, but will place it here to hopefully help others.
    On comparing another InDesign document that appeared to export to PDF ok, we noticed that the type of frame makes a huge difference to image output quality. In the suspect document the frames with the images in them were " [Basic Graphics Frame]+ ". When I changed the frame (or made a new frame) to " [None] "; not only were the images a lot clearer in the InDesign document but they exported to PDF perfectly. Something so simple!!!!

  • Over sharpening on image export.

    I’m using Aperture shooting RAW with a 5D. When I export images (jpeg) they appear to be sharpened far too much. I’m experiencing jagged edges and an artificial look to the exports.
    Is there a way to control the sharpening and other setting when doing an export to JPEG?
    Ken

    Hello, Ken
    Quote: "Is there a way to control the sharpening and other setting when doing an export to JPEG?"
    The export settings are located in Aperture>Presets>Image Export choose the preset you want in JPEG.
    How are you editing the RAW files? How are you exporting the RAW image?
    Using the defaults I have been exporting RAWs to JPEG and the edges are sharp and not over focused.
    love & peace,
    victor

  • Image Export Presets won't save

    Hey folks, since I've upgraded to Aperture 2.1, I hadn't setup any new export presets since using Aperture 1.5 and noticed that my export behaviour is all messed up.
    Specifically - if I try to add my own preset, upon hitting the OK button and revisiting the image export preset screen, my added presets do not persist!
    Even more surprisingly, if I delete many of the existing presets (say all the TIFF presets) when I come back to the Image export presets the deleted presets have returned from the dead.
    Can anyone provide some insight on this? I can't find any other place in Aperure or the OS that governs the preset settings.

    Fyi - if you run into this problem completely un-installing and re-installing Aperture seems to have fixed it.
    I'm not clear on what lead up to the issue tho.

Maybe you are looking for