Custom ATP Check

Hello All
We have custom ATP(Material Check) functionality built in ECC. And we are in position to use this custom FM to carrier out ATP in CRM and show some additional information on the Order.
Please advice on the following:
1. Should we have disable the standard ATP configuration in CRM since we have a custom logic built in ECC
2. Is their any BADI available for carrying custom ATP check(regardless of Configuration) and bring additional data from ECC?
3. How can we use standard fields that holds Confirmed Quantity and date to hold the same data but from custom ATP FM
Cheers
RJ

Yes. I am planning to make expilict call to ECC.
<If you are not big on any integration benefits that might come with the standard, you can as well "disable" the standard call.
There is no BAdI for what you are asking for. But still try CRM_AV_CHECK_R3_01 and CRM_AV_CHECK_FC_01*
Once you have got the values from your custom RFC, check BAdI - CRM_SCHEDLIN_BADI >
I checked this BADI CRM_AV_CHECK_R3_01 but it looks to me that this has the capability to change only the Destination.
I am unsure about this badi CRM_AV_CHECK_FC_01* and when this would be called during the Order Processing.
Could you please let me know more details about the badi CRM_SCHEDLIN_BADI ?
I need to save custom obtained Confirmed Quantity and Date(from RFC) into the standard fields.
Cheers
RJ

Similar Messages

  • Custom ATP Check using Variant Configuration Data in sales order

    I have a requirement to modify the standard SAP ATP check by including the variant configuration data entered on a item.  Standard SAP does not use/include the characteristics data when doing the ATP. None of the available user exits would allow me to do this.
    The scenario is the client has a configurable product that exist in inventory as one item, base unit as IN2.  The batches that exist in inventory have the characteristics of width and length.  The order data specifies a width and a length, they need the ATP to identify the availability based on the characteristics of the batch.
    The solution was to present the user with a list of batches based on the characteristics that meet the criteria.  The user would then have the option of choosing one of the batches which would mean that the line item would include the batch #.  If the user does not want any of the batches, they could choose to select a Make to Order option, which would change the item category of the item, so that it creates a production order upon saving the order.
    The problem I am having implementing this solution is I have not been able to identify the internal table(s) that contains the characteristics data in SAPMV45A after the configuration screen is called.  If anyone knows where that information is during the sales order processing, it would be greatly appreciated.

    Hello Jean,
    Have you managed to find a solution as yet? I know you have not received any replies but am hoping you were able to resolve the problem as we are facing the exact issue on our project.
    Please let me know,
    Thanks,
    Tanya

  • ATP Check in Sales Order

    I have the following problem:
    I am working on a custom ATP check for the Internet Sales Order. I am looking for the user exit or maybe a place when the ATP check is triggered for both cases:
    1 initial material is entered and is checked in which plant is available of the requested quantity by ATP check
    2. when the delivery date (First Date)  on the item level is changed to the future date.
    any ideas are welcomed. will award points.
    Edited by: Maksims  Jegorovcevs on Feb 6, 2009 4:06 PM

    Hi,
    You can try the following user exits;
    EXIT_SAPLATPC_001 - Processing Requirements Table Before Calling Actual Check
    EXIT_SAPLATPC_002 - Processing Results of Actual Check
    For your second question, when the delivery date of the line item is changed, the system itself will do automatic ATP check. Also in transaction OVZ2, for the checking group, you can use the field accumulation (value 3) for availability check with accumulation and confirmed quantities.
    Regards,

  • ATP Check against customer stock for return Sale order

    Hi Friends,
    Pl.help in this.
    1. Is it possible to configure ATP check against Customer stock in a Sale order/Return order/any other way? ( Actuallly, client wants to take back empty cylinders through return sale order by ATP check against the customer stock)
    Regards,
    Mani

    Hi Mani ,
    Are you  taking cylinder as returable packing item or not?
    ex- For soft  drinks or beverages industry  it pretty common , they  use thel returnable package material type and more over why you want  use return sales order for this?
    Note- Just plz explain  scenario to MM and PP People also as availability check with all combination
    Hope it is helpful to you,
    Regards
    Venkat

  • Make-to-Order customer Return Order triggers unwanted ATP check

    When executing a return delivery on a Make-to-Order (Strategy 20, no APO) material, we notice that the ATP check (checking rule BE) gets triggered.  On a return this makes no sense  and of course fails, stopping us from creating the delivery. How can we prevent that?
    Strat. 20 has Req.type KE & Req.Class 040 with the Availability Check flagged, but returns should not trigger an ATP check and therefore the  SLCat is unflagged as such ("Define Procedure for  each schedule line category"), but that seems to be ignored - only for this MTO strategy.
    When, for testing, we change the Strategy on the same material to 40,  the ATP check -everything else being equal- no longer happens, which indicates that the Order type, Del Type, ItCat, SLCat are all ok. What link am I missing ?
    Somehow, selecting a different material strategy impacts the running of ATP.  It would already be useful to know, if in your system, when using Make-To-Order strategy, you see the same or not.
    Help would be very appreciated.
    Hans.

    Thank you for the suggestion.   OVZI already has these settings (MRP type and RqType blank). 
    I don't see how a setting in OVZI would explain that just changing the strategy on the material removes the problem : the key fields here (ItCat, MRPType) would have the same values and they would both come up with a requirement type, linked to a requirement class which has the AvC active (ovzg).  How come that gets overruled (I presume by the schedule line category DN) for one strategy and not the other ?
    I could make an entry in ovzi to force it to go to the same requirement type all the time, but that will impact all materials using this ItCat and MRP type.  That seems like a too generic fix for a specific issue.  If you know of any other link between strategy (specifically MTO) and ATP behaviour, I'd be very interested.

  • Edit postDelete postReport this postReply with quote ATP check but the comm

    hi , all guys :
    when I create the pp-pi order , first i use the batch determination to allocate the component
    batch , then i do the ATP check , but the committed quantity always is zero ,the ATP alway does
    not support confirm quantity (co09 the confirm quantity always is zero),so when i create the other pp-pi order the stock quantity always cover the reqirements quantity of components
    in the mater data , i use the ATP group is 02 (the customizing is standard) i think the ATP scope is irrelative to this issue .
    in the order type control parameters , i use the ATP check
    for example :
    the componet 100-200 have three batchs :
    batch: 20100501 quantity 30 kg
    batch: 20100502 quantity 40 kg
    batch: 20100601 quantity 40 kg
    now , the requirment of component 100-200 is 100 kg
    the batch determination conditions is self expiration .
    so i throght the batch determination and batch split to allocate the bacth and quantity is
    batch: 20100501 quantity 30 kg
    batch: 20100502 quantity 40 kg
    batch: 20100601 quantity 30 kg
    after allocating , i run the ATP check ,BUT the COMMITED QUANTITY ALWAYS IS ZERO .
    I don't know why !!! ,where can configure the ATP confirm quantities (committed quantities) the in the customizing
    can you give help me!!!
    thanks!!!
    best regards

    Davis:
    Check in MRP Group settings, Availability Check session, flag activate full confirmation logic. Test activate full confirmation logic.
    Regards,
    Ricardo

  • ATP check in the Sale order Processing and CO06 transaction (Confirm Qty)

    Hi All,
    While creating the Sale order, After performing the ATP check and saving the document i have called an user exit to make the confirmed Quantity equal to ZERO when the delivery block is set (As requested by customer). That is working fine...
    But the same confirmed Quantity of ZERO is not reflecting in CO06 transaction. Its showing the old value that the value before setting the delivery block.
    I have identified the table VBBE-VMENG which stores the confirmed quantity in CO06 transaction...
    Could you please help me know any USER EXITS or any other solution to change the confirmed quantity to ZERO in CO06 transaction also while delivery block is set in the sale order.
    Thanks &Regards,
    Navaneeth

    Hi All,
    Please help me by providing some clues on this issue...
    Regards,
    Navaneeth

  • ATP check for inbound EDI order

    Hi Friends,
    When I am creating outbound sales order then ATP check is getting executed properly & multiple schedule lines are getting creating in IDOC also (depending on the avaibility of stock).
    But When I am trying to create the inbound sales order via EDI/IDOC there is no ATP check performed & multiple schedule lines are not getting created in sales order(as per the avaibility of stock which I am checkin thro So09 tcode).
    ANy1 has faced smilier problem in past. If yes then please let me know how to solve this problem of ATP check.
    PLease let me know as soon as possible.
    Many thanks in advance
    Br, Prashant

    HI Frndz,
    problem is solved by using following customizing settings
    Customizing:
    SD/function/requirement availability/availability check/default (OVZJ)
    Change the field "Rule availability" to the required value. You receive a list of the possible values using the possible entries pushbutton. Rescheduling is regarded as background processing. If you want to allow partial deliveries, choose the value 'E'.

  • How to delete confirmed schedule lines, without executing the ATP check?

    Sales and Distribution: Concerning ATP (product allocation)
    Situation:
    Step 1: An order is created with priority low. Quantities are confirmed for line items.
    Step 2: A second order is created with a higher priority. No confirmed quantities.
    Rescheduling program (SDV03V02) is then executed. This selects and sorts the orders in the correct order.
    The confirmed quantities for the first (low priority) order should now be freed up, to be able to allocate those quantities to the second (high priority) order.
    The problem I am facing is that the confirmed quantities are NOT released.
    We cannot use BAPI_SALESORDER_CHANGE or SD_SALESDOCUMENT_CHANGE to delete or modify the schedule lines, because these function modules execute the ATP check again. And when that happens, quantities are again confirmed and assigned.
    How can we get rid of the confirmed schedule lines, without executing the ATP check?
    Thanks,
    Edwin.

    Found a solution to the problem:
    In the Rescheduling program we export a parameter to the memory, to make it possible to delete schedule lines without executing the ATP check.
    Deleting of the schedule lines is done with a BAPI, which will call the ATP check automatically for ATP relevant materials. This we want to stop from happening (only when calling the BAPI).
    After the BAPI has been called we FREE the MEMORY ID.
    The parameter is imported again in Customer-Exit EXIT_SAPLATPC_001.
    Transaction.. SMOD
    Enhancement.. ATP00001
    Component.... EXIT_SAPLATPC_001,
    Include...... ZXATPU01.
    The customer exit is used in function AVAILABILITY_CHECK_CONTROLLER, just before calling function 'AVAILABILITY_CHECK'.
    Simply refreshing the ATP tables in the customer-exit, will prevent the ATP check from being executed (because we removed the list containing the materials for which the ATP check needs to be done). As a result, the function 'AVAILABILITY_CHECK' will not be processed.

  • ATP check based on production finish date

    Hi all,
    customer order goods for the 02.06.09.
    Transportation take 10 days so,  by itinerary , I'll have the material avaiability date for the 15.05.2009.
    All' it's OK.
    Mrp planner , based on customer calendar, insert demand for customer date 02.06.09
    We have insert 10 days on material master as Goods receipt processing time, this for anticipate the end of production 10 days before .
    Now we need that atp check production order date not including the Good receipt processing time
    Is it possible ?
    Regards
    Sil
    When I do atp check by sales order , ato check see the 02.06.09 as avaiability date and not the desidered 15.05.09
    Any idea about haw to realised atp check on

    Hi,
    This requirement can not be fulfilled by Standard SAP. But you can address this issue via Z development.
    You need to maintain Z table with Customer and lead time. Write a BDC and run this BDC once sales order is created. So that system will change requirement date as per the Z table.
    I hope this will resolve your issue.
    Regards,
    Shailendra

  • User exit or Badi for changing the lead time in ATP check in VA01/VA02

    Hi All,
    Currently, SAP standard functionality takes up the lead times maintained in material master to create the schedule lines in the sales order in VA01. I am looking for some user exiit/Badi/Enhancement point where I can change the lead time. This is somewhat urgent so any help in this regard is appreciated.
    Regards,
    Sandeep
    Edited by: Sandeep Gaitonde on Sep 1, 2011 9:16 PM

    Hi Sandeep,
    These are the user exits will trigger in va01 .
    SDTRM001 Reschedule schedule lines without a new ATP check
    V45A0001 Determine alternative materials for product selection
    V45A0002 Predefine sold-to party in sales document
    V45A0003 Collector for customer function modulpool MV45A
    V45A0004 Copy packing proposal
    V45E0001 Update the purchase order from the sales order
    V45E0002 Data transfer in procurement elements (PRreq., assembly)
    V45L0001 SD component supplier processing (customer enhancements)
    V45P0001 SD customer function for cross-company code sales
    V45S0001 Update sales document from configuration
    V45S0003 MRP-relevance for incomplete configuration
    V45S0004 Effectivity type in sales order
    V45W0001 SD Service Management: Forward Contract Data to Item
    V46H0001 SD Customer functions for resource-related billing
    V60F0001 SD Billing plan (customer enhancement) diff. to billing plan
    Please check this and post .
    Regards,
    Madhu.

  • CRM ATP Checking using R/3 & Immediate Delivery for Sales Order Type in R/3

    We use CRM 4.0 and R/3 6.4.
    I've configured CRM to do ATP Checking using R/3.  The ATP Checking works fine if I change the Sales Order Type in R/3 to NOT create a delivery immediately. 
    I'm trying to find out if the combination of turning on CRM ATP using R/3 and Create Delivery Immediately for a Sales Order in R/3 are supposed to work properly together.
    If anyone knows and or has this working, I'd like to know.
    Thanks.
    Donna

    Hi ,
    I am working with R/3 and I have the same problem.
    Complete delivery is flowing down from the customer master for all order.
    And then we have items on order which have different shipping point.
    They all fail in background delivery and give the error ' customer requested complete delivery'.
    Is there anyway to override this?
    Any help will be really appreciated.
    regards
    BgS

  • ATP Check Issue - No business system could be determined for logical system

    Dear all
    Got an issue while executing ATP check on a planned order in product view,
    with a message: "No business system could be determined for logical system"
    CIF setting wise:
    regular business system group maintained and assigned in place,
    master data wise:
    business system group info fine in product master,
    Is there anywhere suggested to check under ATP setting:
    category, check mode, business event, check control/check instruction?
    Your kindest enlighting is appreciated,
    Thank you,
    mandy

    Dear Mandy,
    usually this error is caused by a missing customizing entry:       
    spro:                                        
    Integration with SAP Components
       Integration via APO Core Interface (CIF)
         Basic Settings for Creating the System Landscape                             
           - Maintain Business System Group
           - Assign Logical System and Queue Type :
    Please read the documentation for these two transactions and create the systems.
    You need to specifiy there all systems that are in your BSG. The documentation for the customizing of 'name logical system' in APO  says:                                                                               
    To enable the transfer of data between SAP R/3 and SAP APO, you need to name both the SAP APO system in which you are working and the SAP R/3  system to which you want to transfer data as logical systems.          
    I hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Tibor

  • ATP check on Sales order items not due for delivery?

    All,
    In our Sales order, we have a number of dummy material lines. Now, when I use the normal sales order ATP check button, SAP does nothing. However, we have a custom program that does an ATP check, and it returns a zero qty.
    My question is, how do we know if a material is due for delivery, before an ATP check is done? The only suggestion I have is to look at the schedule line, and see if there is a material movement behind it.
    Any other ideas?

    Mark
    This is a classic SD Professional's dilemma, though it manifests differently at different clients. Mostly customers crib about future requirements stopping current sales orders from being delivered or Scheduling agreements with future delivery dates 'stealing' stock from Sales orders.  Another manifestation is production orders usurping components from sales orders for spares and so on. ATP functionality in SAP is pulled in various directions by conflicting demands and it is difficult to satisfy everyone. Companies with chronic probelms often end up with negative ATP which is perhaps the most serious stage of the prognosis.
    Your solution lies in:
    1) Availability check control settings : Sales documents vs. deliveries  : For the delivery, don't include 'Sales Requirements'  and for the sales orders, do include 'Delivery Requirements and so on.
    2) Performing nightly rescheduling (V_V2) with Delivery priority and delivery date as key sort criteria. If the volumes are not high, you can try using manual confirmation via CO06.
    Take a look at this OSS note and the ones mentioned within:
    36520 - Availability check for delivery

  • ATP check in VA01

    Availability To Promise (ATP) is configured to make better delivery planning on Sales Orders and Delivery. SAP standard ATP looks-up the availability of a material in a plant for a given batch if the material is batch managed. If the material is not batch managed, a pop-up information message is issued stating that ATP is done at plant level. If the material is not batch managed, but has a valuation type, standard SAP moves valuation type into batch and then performs ATP. Due to  excise duty model for intercompany sales  valuation type is moved into batch and ATP is performed at the Valuation type level.  
    Detailed explanation of the existing problem and impact to ATP design as of today: In cases where there are direct deliveries from Sweden to a Norwegian Customer (over the Notional Plant), and where the Excise Duty Model results in a Valuation Type u2018TAu2019, the ATP check will look for available stock of Batch u2018TAu2019 in the supplying plant. In this case, in Sweden there will never be u2018TAu2019-stock, only u2018UTu2019 stock is available. Hence the ATP-check fails, delivery promise cannot be met and the new confirmed delivery date will be by default the end of replenishment lead-time (which can be anywhere between 10-30 days!). This request for change is raised to remove the u2018Valuation type, Batchu2019 level in the ATP check.
    I am using the user exit "EXIT_SAPLATPC_001" ,  can any one let me know how to achieve that functionality

    Pratik,
    In R/3 ATP check carried at one level material only for which you are entering schedule/delivery lines in sales order.
    If you are talking about cumulative availability check then please consider APO GATP.
    There is workaround for your requirement by considering Assemble to Order Strategies.
    Please go through below link Sales order availability check considering the ROH stock/procurement time
    Br
    KK

Maybe you are looking for