Custom Authorization Policy

Hello Experts,
I need to create new custom Authorization Policies, but seems that I can create or copy only Policy from these Entity Type:
- User Management
- Role Management
- Authenticated Self Service User Management
What about the other entity Type? Why I cannot create an Authorization Policy based (for example) on Entity Type 'Scheduler'??
Thanks in Advance and Best Regards
AT

Open an SR and ask Oracle for the 11gR1 unpublished API.
We automate the creationing of an authz policy when we create a group. We were able to receive the API for 11gR1 with the understading that it was unsupported, and with a very strong business case for needing it.
Hope that help.

Similar Messages

Authorization Policy for only search users

Hi all,
I need create a custom authorization policy for only search all users in create request. The users can't see any profile information of others users.
Anyone can help me ?
Regards,
Joel

ViewUser Admin Role can search and view users by default. Since the OES policies for this admin role has action as ViewSearch Entity. In your case, you can write EL's to hide Admin tab which will hide Admin ltab links based on current logged-in user profile.
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E27559_01/dev.1112/e27150/uicust.htm#BABHBFGH

Custom OWSM Authorization Policy Not Visible in OSB 11g

I am trying to configure custom OWSM authorization policies to grant web service access in OSB to userids associated with custom WebLogic groups. Both OSB and SOA are version 11.1.1.5 with an Oracle Enterprise 11g database backend. To help rule out some possible operational errors, here are things that ARE working with the combination of SOA and OSB servcies:
* the underlying SOA service functions in the /em console test page
* the OSB proxy service works from the /sbconsole test page with OWSM oracle/wss_username_token_policy enabled
* the oracle/log_policy can be added to the OSB business service and generates log entries
* the outer proxy service can be successfully invoked from a remote client with no security policies,
with HTTP transport security and authorization policies and with OWSM authentication policies
attached (given the correct request payloads)
These findings would appear to rule out connection errors from the OSB engine to the jdbc/mds/owsm DataSource or proper startup of the "OWSM Policy Support in OSB Initializer Application" service within WebLogic. (By the way, that deploys with a typo in its registered name -- "Aplication" with a single p.)
Here are the steps that were performed:
1) created group myfirmIdentityData in WebLogic console (/console)
2) created userid myappuser in WebLogic console
3) added myappuser to the myfirmIdentityData group in WebLogic console
4) cloned the oracle/component_authorization_permitall Security policy to myfirm/authorize_IdentityData
using the Fusion console (/em on the SOA domain)
5) edied myfirm/authorize_IdentityData to add the "role" myfirmIdentityGroup to the
list of permitted roles (***)
*** note -- "roles" referenced within the OWSM policy configuration dialogs actually correspond to "groups" at the WebLogic Server level. A bit confusing at first but harmless.
6) accessed the SOA service in the Fusion console (/em), clicked on the Policies tab and verified
the myfirm/authorize_IdentityData policy is available for application to the SOA service (BUT DID
NOT ATTACH IT HERE -- I'm trying to attach it at the "outer" layer in OSB, not SOA Suite)
7) accessed the Service Bus console (/sbconsole), started a change session, selected the
proxy service, then clicked on the Policies tab, then clicked the Add button in the
Service Level Policies section
At that point, the only services listed are the factory supplied oracle/********* policies. There are two pages listed and flipping between the two doesn't show any other policies other than the oracle/***** policies.
I even tried stopping and starting the domain thinking maybe OSB caches all of the OWSM policies at startup rather than querying the mds_owsm schema dynamically to no avail. No myfirm/****** policies are displayed after a domain restart.
Any insight?
Thanks.

Once again, I wound up opening a Support Request with the TAC for direction on this issue. The policies were not appearing for assignment to OSB proxy / business services because they were being created against the wrong type of object within OWSM.
In a nutshell, policies in OWSM can be created to be applied against:
* Components --- only usable against SOA services
* Service Endpoints --- against URLs used as access points into services
* Service Clients -- against consumers of services as identified by credentials
* All -- all of the above
However, policies built against Components can only be applied to SOA composite services. When I cloned the existing oracle/component_authorization_permitall Security policy to myfirm/authorize_IdentityData policy then limited it to the myfirmIdentityGroup group, that policy would only be assignable to SOA composities since it applied to only Components.
To allow the group based authorization policy to be enforced in the outer OSB tier, the oracle/binding_authorization_permitall_policy was cloned to myfirm/authorize_IdentityGroup. That policy was defined to apply to endpoints and once saved, appeared in the GUI of the Service Bus console to assign to the proxy service for the service being implemented. A second component policy named myfirm/componentauthorize_IdentityGroup was cloned from oracle/component_authorize_permitall_policy to perform the group authorization at the SOA layer.
A different issue is being encountered configuring the OSB business service to forward the OWSM headers from the outer proxy service to the SOA service so the authorization succeeds at the inner layer but that's a different problem. With the SOA layer authorization policy disabled, client tests to the proxy service function correctly with a userid in the myfirmIdentityGroup group and generate an authorization failure when another client credential is used that does not belong to myfirmIdentityGroup.

Authorization Policy for Modify user in OIM 11gR2

Hi Experts,
Requirement: I want the users in particular org not to modify certain user attributes and users from other org should be allowed to modify user.
I have created user1 whose organization is org1 and role is role1. I have also created user user2 under same org and same role. I assigned the Admin Role "User Administrator" role to user2.
So If user2 from same org1 tries to modify certain attributes then OIM should throw error message. I have completed till this.
But when the user from diff org say org2 with Admin Role "User Administrator" tries to modify user, OIM is not allowing to modify user which should not be the case.
I want the Auth Policy to trigger only for Org1. I have specified the below condition for my custom policy in OES admin console but it is not triggering.
The condition is
IF ( OrclOIMTargetEntity = 'true' AND OrclOIMUserOrganizations = 'true' AND STRING_AT_LEAST_ONE_MEMBER_OF(OrclOIMUserOrganizations,['25','1000000']) = true )
What am I missing?
Any help is much appreciated.

Hi
Can anyone let me know the steps to restrict modify user operation for the users belonging to specific organization in OIM 11gR2. The condition which I specified under Authorization Policy in APM console is not triggering at all.
Thanks!

ISE authorization Policy not working

Hi ,
I have configured the ISE as per the belwo link
https://supportforums.cisco.com/document/110031/central-web-authentication-cwa-guests-ise
but my authorization policy is not working as when user get connected to guest wlan it get authneticated but when it look for authorization
it going to default policy it should hit on above policy created screen shot as below

What version of ISE + patch are you running?. Could you please send an screenshot of AUTH policies including the default --- > USE part?. Are you using customized portal for the first authentication process?
CWA is pretty straightforward. Only issues I faced was multiple VM (ISE Personas) running on one single server was not replicating properly the AUTHZ policies so I added the PSN persona into the PAN Node and everything worked fine immediately. In addition to that, I realized that I needed at least ONE ENTRY into the ISE PAN Internal Endpoints DB so I could hit the AUTH Policy for MAB & user not found condition which sent me to the AUTHZ = User Unknown + Redirect. Once I authenticated the user using the Default Portal that meant I hit the GUEST FLOW policy. If you are using customized portals for the first authentication process, check: web portal mgmt. --- > Guest --- > MultiPortal Configurations --- > Customized Portal -- > Authentication part.

Problems with Authorization Policy, the USER has expired and the ISE is allowing access.

Hi,
My end customer reported an issue with ISE 1.1.4-218.
The GUEST user is expired but still can authenticate in the WLAN.
That's an known issue/bug?
Thanks!
Regards,
Rafael Eloi

Check if the option in the configuration part of the Authentication process = CONTINUE.
For example, when you use CWA, the IF AUTHENTICATION FAILED Option = CONTINUE so the MAB Auth always fails but based on that Option your connection continues so you are actually redirected using the AUTHORIZATION Policy.

Osb 10gR3 - Active Intermediary proxy with custom WS-Policy files

I'm setting up an Active Intermediary proxy, and the Security option on the proxy to "Process WS-Security header" is only usable when Custom Policy Bindings are assigned to the proxy. But I don't want to use the default Oracle policies.
The "Select WS-Policy" popup within OSB only shows entries under the Predefined Policy tab. Yet I have custom WS-Policy files which have been imported into OSB.
So what's the trick?

Hi,
Below are the steps followed
- OSB Proxy service has 'oracle/wss_username_token_service_policy' attached to it.
- Iam invoking this from BPEL. BPEL process has 'oracle/wss_username_token_client_policy' attached.
- I can invoke the osb proxy from bpel by passing credentials - No Issues.
Now I need to put some authorization restriction to the proxy service, so only specific users can access that.
-I used Role=Admin as a policy condition restriction under security in Proxy service.
-Then I went to proxy test console and I added the 'oracle/wss_username_token_client_policy' credentials and weblogic/xxxxx at Transport section and I was able to invoke the process. Here weblogic has a Admin Role.
-I cannot invoke the same proxy service from BPEL in Jdeveloper now.
All Iam trying to do is to protect my proxy by authrorization policy.
Thanks
Jagan.

Custom WS-Policy Files in Console Service Endpoint Polices List

hi
Not sure which WLS newsgroup for this so here goes.
I want to assign custom WS-Policy files to a web service via the console (i.e. post-deployment).
By default, the Service Endpoint Policies list only shows a small subset of default policy files within weblogic.jar and none of the Wssp1.2-* policy files. (i.e. only the proprietary WLS 9.0 WS-Policy files)
Is this correct behaviour? I want to experiment with policies based on the current WS Security Policy Standard without hard-coding the names of files into the service.
Is there a way to make these other supplied WSSecurityPolicy 1.2 policies appear in the list?
Thanks
Jim Nicolson

Hi,
Below are the steps followed
- OSB Proxy service has 'oracle/wss_username_token_service_policy' attached to it.
- Iam invoking this from BPEL. BPEL process has 'oracle/wss_username_token_client_policy' attached.
- I can invoke the osb proxy from bpel by passing credentials - No Issues.
Now I need to put some authorization restriction to the proxy service, so only specific users can access that.
-I used Role=Admin as a policy condition restriction under security in Proxy service.
-Then I went to proxy test console and I added the 'oracle/wss_username_token_client_policy' credentials and weblogic/xxxxx at Transport section and I was able to invoke the process. Here weblogic has a Admin Role.
-I cannot invoke the same proxy service from BPEL in Jdeveloper now.
All Iam trying to do is to protect my proxy by authrorization policy.
Thanks
Jagan.

Custom Authorizer

I have created a custom Authorizer and RoleMapper for 8.1SP5. I have also implemeted a new a new Security Console Extension (SecurityExtensionV2), replacing the default WL screens. I have everything working except for one small item. When I try to create/edit a Web Application's Security Policy or Scoped Role the default "URL Pattern" screen appears. The text on the screen says that URL Patterns already defined are shown below. They are not. I cannot find any way to replace this screen or any methods in the Policy/Role MBeans that are being called to populate the list. Once I enter something into the input field, the getExtensionForPolicy() or getExtensionForRole() method is called with the correct resourse and url.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Joe [email protected]

I have created a custom Authorizer and RoleMapper for 8.1SP5. I have also implemeted a new a new Security Console Extension (SecurityExtensionV2), replacing the default WL screens. I have everything working except for one small item. When I try to create/edit a Web Application's Security Policy or Scoped Role the default "URL Pattern" screen appears. The text on the screen says that URL Patterns already defined are shown below. They are not. I cannot find any way to replace this screen or any methods in the Policy/Role MBeans that are being called to populate the list. Once I enter something into the input field, the getExtensionForPolicy() or getExtensionForRole() method is called with the correct resourse and url.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Joe [email protected]

Modify/Suppress default Authorization policy

We have a requirement to restrict Proxy assignment only to a restricted set of users. There is a default authorization policy 'Self Service User Management All Users Policy' which grant proxy assignment permission to all users. Since this policy exist we are not able to restrict the permission to assing proxy to a limited set of users.
1.Is it possible to modify or delete default authorization policy ,Self Service User Management All Users Policy,
2. If not, is there a way to override the default policy
Thnx

Hi Siddarth
Please follow the instructions here to accomplish ur requirement:
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E14571_01/doc.1111/e14309/appoimcust.htm#BCFIAGCD [27.4 Creating Custom Proxy Plug-in]
Regards
user12841694

Custom authorization provider for WL7 problem (not getting all parameters from ContextHandler)

I'm implementing a custom authorization provider for WebLogic 7.
In my Access Decision isAccessAllowed method I need to check values of
the parameters passed to an EJB method. Now, if an EJB method I have
two parameters of the same type, for example int, when I get
ContextElement array from ContextHandler and iterate through it to get
names and values of the parameters I get the same value (value of the
first int parameter) from both ContextElement's.
Here is the code:
String [] names = ch.getNames();
for (int i = 0; i < names.length; i++)
String name = names;
System.out.println("name = " + name);//here it gets array of
Strings, which contains two parameter names: "int","int",
which are the types of EJB method parameters
ContextElement[] ces= ch.getValues(names);
for (int j = 0; j < ces.length; j++)
     ContextElement ce = ces[j];
     System.out.println(ce.getName()+ " = " + ce.getValue());
//here if the value of the first int was 2 and the second 0,
it would get 2 from both ContextElements (each of ContextElements will
have name "int"
If I try this with method parameters of different types, for example
int with value 2 and long with value 0, then this code work fine -
first ContextEleement has name int and value 2 and the second has name
long and value 0.
Thanks,
-Oleg Kozlov.

I'm implementing a custom authorization provider for WebLogic 7.
In my Access Decision isAccessAllowed method I need to check values of
the parameters passed to an EJB method. Now, if an EJB method I have
two parameters of the same type, for example int, when I get
ContextElement array from ContextHandler and iterate through it to get
names and values of the parameters I get the same value (value of the
first int parameter) from both ContextElement's.
Here is the code:
String [] names = ch.getNames();
for (int i = 0; i < names.length; i++)
String name = names;
System.out.println("name = " + name);//here it gets array of
Strings, which contains two parameter names: "int","int",
which are the types of EJB method parameters
ContextElement[] ces= ch.getValues(names);
for (int j = 0; j < ces.length; j++)
     ContextElement ce = ces[j];
     System.out.println(ce.getName()+ " = " + ce.getValue());
//here if the value of the first int was 2 and the second 0,
it would get 2 from both ContextElements (each of ContextElements will
have name "int"
If I try this with method parameters of different types, for example
int with value 2 and long with value 0, then this code work fine -
first ContextEleement has name int and value 2 and the second has name
long and value 0.
Thanks,
-Oleg Kozlov.

How to add custom authorization object to a SAP standard transaction

Hi All,
I have a standard tcode IW22 (change PM Notification) and I would lock changing when some users modify the field Functional Location (field TPLNR).
Since this field does not have an authorization object associated, I've tried to solve this problem with the following steps:
- tcode SU20 - creation of new authorization field TPLNR with data element TPLNR
- tcode SU21 - creation of a new auth object in transaction SU21 with name ZPM and field (TPLNR, ACTVT and TCOD)
- tcode SU24 - insert of new authorization field e check indicator (green)
- tcode SU22 - check indicator - check (green)
After this we have created a new role with PFCG and add transaction IW22; the new auth.ZPM was added manually.
We have try to analyze log (ST01 trace) but it seems no check was made in the trace file.
It seems new authorization object was not checked.
My question is: "Is it possible to add a custom authorization object into standard transaction and implementing authorization check without writing abap code in exit or badi ?"
Thanks
Maurizio

> My question is: "Is it possible to add a custom authorization object into standard transaction and implementing authorization check without writing abap code in exit or badi ?"
>
No .. not possible. The list of Auth. objects SAP proposed in SU24 for each Stnd. SAP TCodes are basically documentation of the Authority-Checks in the program for that TCode. The extra advantage of SU24 is to set the object status (means the proposal for availability in PFCG) among any of the four check indicators. So that we can provide our own value (customer specific values which are basically defined and separate from sap provided values) and reinforce the authorization concept of the organization.
So you need to provide a Authority-Check for ZPM in the program of IW22 to make sure that the fields you want to be checked are really being checked during execution of the tcode.
Regards,
Dipanjan

How to create and configure a custom authorization service

Anyone has any idea how to create a custom authorization module? Can anyone tell me where can I find a documentation or some example how to do it?
I appreciate any idea.
Regards.

The Access Manager developer guide on the Authentication SPI should be all you need to get started
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-4675/6n6qfk0nf?a=view

HR ABAP Custom Authorization Check

Hi all,
We know that Implicit authorization check is carried out. The system determines whether the user has the authorizations required for the organizational features of the employees selected with
GET PERNR.
I have a question, if we create a custom authorization then, whether this custom authorization is checked or not.
Thanks in Advance.

There is no difference in the coding of the check, which as RJ has stated needs to be somewhere at the correct coding location... otherwise it is going no where.
Some special differences are:
- The object class of the custom object in SU21 => Authorization objects in HR cannot be deactived context specifically in SU24. You can create custom objects within SAP classes.
- Depending on the transport type of your system, you will have to maintain transaction SU24 with a check indicator for the object - so make in known that the transaction has the capability to check the object. This does not affect "customer" systems, but is still a very good practice for the same reason that SAP forces it in their own development systems.
- Additional object checks in SE93 (which are typically "plausibility" checks) are not subject to this restraint. The check is always there, and your ability to bypass it is limited if you check the tcode authority of the caller at initialization of the (called) coding context. CALL TRANSACTION will skip this check, unless the called transaction is sy-tcode already (as it is in variant transactions... which urban legends claim to be secured to use for CALL TRANSACTION).
This concept is to a large extent influenced by SAP's own development guidelines and "settings" - but it is advisable to understand them and the intended authorization concept - to be able to create consistent customer implementations of SAP products.
Of course there are exceptions to the rules... but they generally cause problems and sooner or later need to be corrected as well when the auditors get hold of them....
Cheers,
Julius
Edited by: Julius Bussche on Apr 27, 2009 9:03 PM

ISE 1.2 - Authorization Policy for Digital Certificates

Hi Everyone.
I have Cisco Ise 1.2 when I created authorization Policy rule for PEAP(MSCHAPv2) and the ISE can match on the rule e permit based on AuthProfile.
BUT, authentications using digital certificates (EAP_TLS) I can´t do some AuthorizationPolicy for match.
I´m try some:
if
any
AND
authEAPprot: EAP-TLS
AND
Certificate:inssue : iqual : CA-root
THEN
ACCESS_FULL
In Operations>Authetications I can see the authentication and when I open the details, I can see the method is EAP-TLS BUT my rule is not correct cuz authorization policy that use is Default.
Someone can do some Tip about How i can make this rule for authentications that use EAP-TLS (digital certificates)???
tks

Hi,
You will have to upload all certificates (intermediate and root) that are used to sign the client cert into the ISE CA database. You will also have to make sure that checkbox for trust for client authentication is checked.
Thanks,
Tarik Admani
*Please rate helpful posts*

Custom Authorization Policy

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for