Customer-specific variance calculation

Hello,
We use a Manufacturing Variance Calculation different from OPM. In our calculation, the theoretical production quantity is computed as follows:
Divide actual quantity by the standard quantity per costing formula. So, if the actual batch quantity is 300 and the formula weight per output is 1.2 (1200 lbs of ingredients to produce 1000 lbs of finished product per costing formula), then the theoretical quantity is 250 (300/1.2). Planned quantity per production formula is 400. The variance "per us" is favourable by 400 - 250 (Planned - Theoretical) = 150 instead of 400 - 300 (Planned - Actual) = 100.
Is there a way similar to Oracle GL's STAT accounts to use our calculation instead of standard Oracle. We are only looking at our options, not saying this calculation is correct.
Thanks,
Sanjib

Hi Meenakshi,
I dont want to post the entries automatically, i just want to see the interest calculation (at what rate and for which period)?
so, i dont think system will create any entries if we dont post the entries automatically.
Thank You

Similar Messages

Process order variance calculation not taking the GI+Activity confirmation Cost

Hi,
Process oder was settled in the Month of June,2014. Accounting document was generated,but system only considered the GR cost. System was not considered the GI as well as activity cost on variance calculation. Variance posted GR= Variance.
22nd June,2014 Variance calculated, on 30th WIP entery also reversed with the same amount.
1st July,Order done untecho and no transactions are posted in the Month of July.
Now they would like to settle the Process in the Month of July. system is throwing the error " Status DLV/TECHO reversed after settlement period 006.2014"
Order status was TECO PRT CNF PRC CSER BASC BCRQ CRF No variance calculation status.
Any one faced any similar issue , please suggest me how to proceed.

Hi,
Please check SAP Note 386816 for error KV181.
In general it is recommended to use the Cost estimate of the Process Order (Planned Cost Estimate) for the WIP at target calculation. In additional please pay attention to SAP Note 386816 which explains this procedure and which prerequisites must be met to calculate WIP at targets or the scrap variance. Even if the group counter of the routing is different you can still calculate WIP at targets but only if the message type of message KV181 is set to SPACE by Customizing settings.
Hope this will a bit help to you.
Best regards, Takashi

Transfer customer specific Roles assigned to a customer from R/3 to CRM

Hello dear all,
on R/3 side there are customer specific roles defined and assigned to customers. These roles are sales area depending.
On CRM side we plant to uses the Employee Responsible relationship to build up these customer specific roles. To differentiate these roles we want to use the partner function which is assigned to the sales area.
Can anybody show me how to do the initial load of the CRM system and map the role to the Employee Responsible relationship?
I assume that I have to create a own mapping function module to realize this. Where do I register this function module so it will be used during the initial load? How do I debug these functionality?
A similar functionality we have to build up in case of the upload to the R/3 system. There we have map the Employee Responsible relationship to the specific role and assign it to the customer. Where do I register this function module?
Thanks for your help!
Best regards
Michael

hi
In order to replicate the ECC customer to CRM customer the following steps (tips) might be helpful to you:
First a Mapping structure should exist between business partners in SAP CRM and ERP ECC Customers in both the directions. In the ERP ECC system you can see this mapping using transaction /nPIDE
You should create your own account group for the data transfer from SAP CRM to ERP ECC
In SAP CRM, the roles sold-to party, ship-to party, bill-to party and payer are assigned to the classification Customer and the customer is assigned to exactly one account group in ERP ECC
For consistent distribution of Business Partners with identical numbers in both the systems, the internal number range (ex. 1-5999) should correspond to an external number assignment in the ERP ECC system or vice versa. Thus a business partner is given the same number in both systems.
For data exchange to be successful, you must ensure that the field control (mandatory fields) between the CRM system and the ERP system matches.
Besides Both SAP CRM and SAP ECC can talk to each other only when there is some settings done in the middleware. And for the CRM only a small plugin is needed for the ERP/ECC Connectivity.
Now whenever you have both the system mapped then if you create a BP in CRM it will automatically flow in the ERP System. And also the vice versa. As for the roles are concerned, the roles like ship-to-party and some few specific roles are mapped in ECC system. For a complete look at roles matching have a look at the following link.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm50/helpdata/en/52/cff837a9aae651e10000009b38f8cf/frameset.htm
Once you have created a BP in CRM it will be created in some Account group in ECC. And in that AC GRP you will be not be able to create the Customer with identical ID. So if your systems are connected then even manually you also cannot create same BPs.
And for all of these the PIDE settings in ECC needs to be maintained properly.
Hope it serves your purpose
best regards
ashish

Actual cost is not seen in the variance calculation KKS2

Hi
I   did variance calculation of a Production order ( after telco) . Its a co - product.   The target cost , actual cost and allocated cost   fields are present after execution.   Now the actual cost field is   blank and so   the variance is not correct.
Pl advise on why the actual cost field is not populated with the cost.
Thanks
kamala

Hi
KOB1 shows the actual cost . I do TECO for the PO and calculate Variance for co-product material, and the actual cost is showing at zero. But   then i do settlement KO88, and the   variance amount gets posted CORRECTLY and FI document is generated.
So why is the ACTUAL COST field   ' ZERO'    in KKS2, but    KO88   settlement shows the variance amount.
It there some different logic to do variance calculation for   PO   involving main product which have co-products in it.
Thanks for any inputs
kamala

Production variances calculation when using assessment to PP orders

Hi,
I managed to activate assessment to Production orders in BS12.
I activated business transactiun RKIU for PP orders object.
Now it's possible to allocate OH costs from Cost centers to production orders.
However, I have some problem of other nature.
When I do the standard price calculation - the Overhead costs from Production Departament CC are calculated as % overhead using costing sheet. It is done by cost element with cost element ctg 41.
The actual OH costs from Cost centers are allocated using assessment. Other cost elements with cost element category 42 are being used here.
How will the system calculate production variances in this case?
Do u think it is possible to match these two different cost elements?
Will this CE with 41 ctg be considered during variances calculation and if yes - which variance category will it be.
I am uncertain about that, cause in normal cases - activitity CE or materials consumption CE are the same in actual and target. In my case overhead CE are different in actual and in target.
Can u help me with that?
Best wishes,
Karol

It's looks like you are right. I've made production version for configured material and production order created. Thanks.
Due to such a behavior we have to make two different integration models - the first for KMATs and its PDSs and the second for configured variants. And we have to make production versions for all variants.
Am I right?

BP extend : how to use FM to update customer specific fields ?

Hello
I'm working on a CRM 2007 project and for customer needs, the BP data have been extent with specific fields using EEWB. So specific FMs have been automatically generated to manage the specific data. We want to use these FM to maintain the values of the specific fields. In the EEWB transaction, in the Task BUPA_API for the specific object, 2 FMs have been generated : ZZ1XO_BUPA_MAINTAIN and ZZ1XO_BUPA_MNTN_ALL : we suppose we have to use these FMs to update the values fo this object. This object (customer specific data) is time dependent with gaps and multiple instance. We tried to use these 2 FMs to update values but it does not work : anybody has already used this kind of FMs ?
Thanks to all.

Jerome,
Normally I use the FM modules generated by the EEWB that contain API to update the data. However keep in mind if this is a Z-Table and you don't like what is provided, then add your own BAPI modules to the BDT function group to update the data.
Take care,
Stephen

PA - IT0000 'Customer Specific' Status

Hi All,
IT0000 has a field 'Customer Specific' Status. This field is by default Grayed Out. We can default values in this while creating and Action.
My requirement is that I want to make this field as input field. I want to change the values during creation of Action Infotype. I could not make it using table T588M
Anybody have idea how to make it input field?
With Regards
Shyam V

HI Sikandar,
I just want to make field 'Customer Specific Stauts' as input field. Using T588M we can change the field characteristics for the screen which we get during all the PA action.
By using the same table i could not make this field as input field.
What more elaboration you need?

Issue in Updating Customer specific fields in WBS using BAPI_BUS2054_CREATE_MULTI

Hi Experts,
I am able to create the WBS element using BAPI_BUS2054_CREATE_MULTI.But the issue is i am not able to update customer specific fields even after passing the fields as per specification in Function module documentation. I have also created an implementation of BADI as per below specification in FM documentation:
Procedure for Filling Standard Enhancements
Before you call the BAPI for each object that is to be created or changed,
for which you want to enter customer-specific table enhancement fields, add a
data record to the container ExtensionIn:
STRUCTURE: Name of the corresponding help structure
VALUEPART1: Key of the object + start of the data part
VALUEPART2-4: If required, the continuation of the data part
VALUPART1 to VALUPART4 are therefore filled consecutively, first with the
keys that identify the table rows and then with the values of the
customer-specific fields. By structuring the container in this way, it is
possible to transfer its content with one MOVE command to the structure of the
BAPI table extension.
Note that when objects are changed, all fields of the enhancements are
overwritten (as opposed to the standard fields, where only those fields for
which the respective update indicator is set are changed). Therefore, even if
you only want to change one field, all the fields that you transfer in
ExtensionIn must be filled.
Checks and Further Processing
Using the methods ...CREATE_EXIT1 or. ...CHANGE_EXIT1 of the BAdI
BAPIEXT_BUS2001, BAPIEXT_BUS2002, and BAPIEXT_BUS2054, you can check the entered
values (and/or carry out other checks).
In the BAdI's second method, you can program that the data transferred to the
BAPI is processed further (if you only want to transfer the fields of the CI
includes, no more action is required here).
But still i am unable to update fields though i am able to create WBS with rest of the fields except custom fields.
I am using attached code to achieve this.Do we need to code anything inside method create_exit1 or create_exit2 implementation for BADI or
Please help on priority

Hi Rahul,
First observation from your code is that i could not find the assignment for the field
GWA_WBS_EXTIN-STRUCTURE. I hope you are not filling this field, that could be one reason for failure. Try to do it and let us know if you still have the problem.
Br..
Dwaraka

How to populate customer specific field data in table /SAPAPO/ORDFLDS

Dear Gurus,
I have explained in detail about the problem we face. I guess persons who has implemented enhancement: /SAPAPO/RRP_IO_COL in their system can help me out.
Background:
Purchase requisitions in APO is created by an idoc that comes from a legacy system using BAPI CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_POSRVAPS_SAVEMULTI3'.
Business Requirement:
I have a business requirement where I need to populate an additional data 'Original delivery date' from the idoc during PR creation in Product view.
Development:
To achieve the above requirement, we are following the below procedure in our development system.
1. We are using enhancement: /SAPAPO/RRP_IO_COL, method: RRP_USEX_COLS_FILL_01 and RRP_USEX_COLS_GET_TEXT_01 to display an additional field 'Original delivery date' in /sapapo/rrp3 - elements view. This field is restricted to Purchase requisition (Order category: AG) only. We are planning to populate the additional data 'Original delivery date' in this customer specific field and store it in table: /SAPAPO/ORDFLDS at the time of PR creation.
2. Table: /SAPAPO/ORDFLDS is appended with the 'customer specific field'.
3. We couldnt find a document on how the data can be populated in table /SAPAPO/ORDFLDS.
4. How to polulate the live cache data in the table '/APAPO/ORDFLDS' ? ( i.e using connection parameter )?
Appreciate if you can throw me some light on this.
Thanks
Vignesh M

Hi Vignesh,
ANy luck on this ? I am trying the almost same thing...and stuck at same point.
Please let us know if you have any more information.

HR ABAP: HR Report Category: "Customer Specific Status" Name Change!

Experts,
I've successfully created a Custom HR Report Category and assigned it to my program. Report works fine, with all customized fields that i selected!
There is one field called "Customer Specific Status", which needs to be changed to our requirement. For instance, the existing field's text "Customer Specific Status" needs to be changed as "NS Status" ?
Helpful answers will be definitely awarded!
Thanks a lot!
Rgds,
Sundar.

Hello All,
I got the answer already!
Thanks!
Regards,
Sundar.

Variance calculation repport (KKS2) different to variance line items (KOB3)

Hi, need your help.
I´ve run variance calculation (KKS2) for one production order, one target cost version and it has calculated correctly all cost element variances. However, when I display variance line items (KOB3) for this order with the same target cost version used in KKS2, calculation is´t correct for all cost element and if I compare it with KKS2 repport, it displays different values. Does anyone know why?
some details that may help:
WIP is customize
The company I´am working for had activated "write line Items" (OKV1) after the golive,
Scrap check box is activate in variance key,
All variance categories are activate,
etcetera
Thank you for your help.
Regards,
André

Hi
I would suggest raise an OSS msg then.. Because i dont see any possible reason why this could happen
In my case, the only discrepancy I found was variance doc was posted to FI and not to COPA because the user did not execute variance calculation in update mode.. So, variance got posted in FI, but not in COPA...
But the posted values always matched in my case,,,
Do update us incase you find solution
Regards
Ajay M

How to add Customer Specific Product ID PRID_VENDOR to product with report

CRM5.0
Hi,
I am trying to find out, how to add the customer specific product ID (product->relationships->customers) to a product with a report or a function module.
It is stored in table COMM_IL_PRDCPN, data element COMT_PRID_VENDOR.
Is there a class/method, function module, or some example coding, how I can do that?
Thanks an regards,
Thomas

Hi,
I don't think in Std it is possible to create CMIR in VD51 for cust.grp..
u can try LSMW to create CMIR for sold-tos..
Reg,
JJ

Customer-Specific Key Figure and MCI3 analysis report

Hi,
We have created a "Customer-Specific Key Figures" in customizing and mapped the key with value category. But this new defined key figure is not available in the report MCI3.
How to get this figure in the analysis report MCI3 etc , i.e. how to update the information structure S115.
Regards

Hello,
You have to develope the new programme using that info structure and update that new value field in your customising logic programe .
Regards,
Rakesh

EDI customer specific mappings

Hello Experts,
I am having a scenario where the old legacy system is planned to be replaced by PI (7.11)-Seeburger.
Now the old system based out of Gentran had around 100 maps pertaining to their 100 customers for distribution of their Invoices and ASN.
Hence wanted to find out how best can be achievable using PI Seeburger. We thought of following options
1] Create 100 mappings in PI and have conditional interface determination based on the customer. But in this we will have to hard-code customer DUNS number into interface determination conditions
2] Create one base mapping in PI and another in ABAP mappings with customer format maintained in the Z-tables of PI ABAP stack and ABAP mappings filtering the same. This would lead to complex ABAP mappings program.
3] Create one mapping in PI and write conditions in Seeburger BIC mappings. Again writing so many conditions in BIC mappings.
Anyone worked in such scenario, please let me know the best suitable solution in this case based on your experience. Thanks in advance.
Regards
Rajeev

>> One Receiver say EDIReceiver
This is recommended. But then your EDIReceiver system should be able to send invoices to all the 100 customers based on the data in EDI file.
>>100 interface determinations for 100 maps with conditions based on the partners
If you have option/resource/time to functionally check the details for each of these customer individually, it is recommended to group them based on some business rule. Creating 100 maps blindly will make many redundant mappings. Try to make small groups of 4-5 mappings based on business requirement and reduce the number of maps. When thinking about changes to customer specific mappings, always think two ways.
e.g. If you have separate maps for 100 customers and lets say they belong to same region. In future, if due to any legal requirement change, any change is required in the maps, it would be tedious and not so good design to change all the maps. Therefore, as I said group them based on business/functional logic.
>>Multiple Receiver agreements based on the versions required each having comm channel with X2E mapping for the version required.
Note that these standard X2E and E2X mappings are part of Seeburger BIC license. If you already have purchased BIC, your estimation for this part should be minimal.
Regards,
Prateek Raj Srivastava

How to use customer-specific fields with FI-CA event 940?

The following text can be found under FI-CA event 940:
You can also set customer-specific fields if you have defined the predefined include for customer enhancements CI_FKK_ACCIT_CUS in the structure FKK_ACCIT_CUS. The fields included here must have the same field name as the fields included in the structure ACCIT. These can also originate from an enhancement of the coding block in General Ledger Accounting. The fields Reservation Class and Reservation Key of the reconciliation key and the totals record are available as import parameters.
My requirement is to populate the field HZUON in this event, which will be called when running t-code FPG1 (Transfer of FI-CA total records to general ledger)
The problem is the fact that the output of the event (i.e. output of function module FKK_SAMPLE_0940 at first) only have the following fields:
E_ZUONR     LIKE     ACCIT-ZUONR     Zuordnung (BSEG-ZUONR)
E_XREF2     LIKE     ACCIT-XREF2     Referenz (BSEG-XREF2)
E_SGTXT     LIKE     ACCIT-SGTXT     Positionstext
E_BUPLA     LIKE     ACCIT-BUPLA     Businnes Place (Korea only)
I tried adding a new field to structure CI_FKK_ACCIT_CUS and adding this field to the output of the event 940, but how do I ensure that the content of the field will be used to populate the HZUON field of the FI document during "transfer of FI-CA total records to general ledger"?
Cheers,
Teo

Hi Teo,
I happened to see this post from you when I searched for a similar scenario related to event 940. I also need to add two fields in CI_FKK_ACCIT_CUS and make these fields as outputof the event. Did you come across any solution for the same? If so, can you please share.
Regards,
Harikumar. S
Edited by: Harikumar Sasidharan on Dec 30, 2009 12:14 PM

Customer-specific variance calculation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for