Data display error in OBIEE -Generated query returns correct result on DB

Hi experts,
We are retrieving the data from cube based on MS SQL SERVER.
When i generate the report in answers for the amount A(Sum in rpd) it display the amount 18 only and when i fire the generated MDX query on cube its shows amount as 144(18+126)..what could be the reason its hide the amount 126 at the time of display.
any suggestion plz.
Regards,
S

Hi,
Can you please tell, which view you are using? Check the same report in Table view if there is any agg issue from report/RPD side.
Regards,
Kashi

Similar Messages

  • Same Query returning different result (Different execution plan)

    Hi all,
    To day i have discovered a strange thing: a query that return a different result when using a different execution plan.
    The query :
    SELECT  *
      FROM schema.table@database a
    WHERE     column1 IN ('3')
           AND column2 = '101'
           AND EXISTS
                  (SELECT null
                     FROM schema.table2 c
                    WHERE a.column3 = SUBSTR (c.column1, 2, 12));where schema.table@database is a remote table.
    when executed with the hint /*+ ordered use_nl(a c) */ these query return no result and its execution plan is :
    Rows     Row Source Operation
          0  NESTED LOOPS  (cr=31 r=0 w=0 time=4894659 us)
       4323   SORT UNIQUE (cr=31 r=0 w=0 time=50835 us)
       4336    TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE2 (cr=31 r=0 w=0 time=7607 us)
          0   REMOTE  (cr=0 r=0 w=0 time=130536 us)When i changed the execution plan with the hint /*+ use_hash(c a) */
    Rows     Row Source Operation
       3702  HASH JOIN SEMI (cr=35 r=0 w=0 time=497839 us)
      22556   REMOTE  (cr=0 r=0 w=0 time=401176 us)
       4336   TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE2 (cr=35 r=0 w=0 time=7709 us)It seem that when the execution plan have changed the remote query return no result.
    It'is a bug or i have missed somthing ?
    PS: The two table are no subject to insert or update statement.
    Oracle version : 9.2.0.2.0
    System version : HP-UX v1
    Thanks.

    H.Mahmoud wrote:
    Oracle version : 9.2.0.2.0
    System version : HP-UX v1Hard to say. You're using a very old and deprecated version of the database, and one that was known to contain bugs.
    9.2.0.7 was really the lowest version of 9i that was considered to be 'stable', but even so, it's old and lacking in many ways.
    Consider upgrading to the latest database version at your earliest opportunity. (or at least apply patches up to the latest 9i version before querying if there is bugs in your really low buggy version)

  • Syntax error in OBIEE generated Physical query - Advance filter concept

    I encountered a syntax error when running a report with the help of advanced filter concept.
    I am getting syntax error at the physical query generated by the OBIEE for main report.
    I used a sub report with the help of advanced filter concept in main report.
    I am posting the physical query for the convenience.
    select D1.c2 as c1,
    D1.c1 as c2
    from
    (select sum(T600347.sales_usd) as c1,
    T601002.currency as c2
    from
    (Select distinct currency from pfact) T601002,
    pfact T600347
    where ( T600347.currency = T601002.currency and T600347.pdate between ( select distinct min(D1.c1) as c1* from
    (select D1.c1 as c1
    from
    (select D1.c1 as c1
    from
    *(select max(T600425.pdate) as c1*
    from
    *(select distinct pdate from pdates where pdate is not null) T600425*
    where  ( T600425.pdate < 11/22/2010 )
    *) D1*
    ) D1
    ) D1 ) and '11/25/2010')
    group by T601002.currency
    ) D1
    I executed the query against my database(sybase) in query tool. It showed error.
    I took out the column alias generated by the OBIEE ("as c1" as underlined). Then the query is working fine.
    How to disable OBIEE from generating the alias.
    Is there any way to do it.
    If obiee is generating the physical query, i am suprised to see a syntax error.
    The bold part is the query from Intermediate report
    I underlined the problematic part.
    Please help me. This is an urgent reuirement,
    Thanks in advance for the help.

    HI,
    When I execute the query on query tool ( my database is sybase)
    I am geting error at "as c1" part, as underlined in the query.
    when I remove that and execute the query, It is generating the output.
    here is the better view of query and error:
    http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/4719/25187227.jpg

  • View Display Error in OBIEE with Essbase Cubes

    Hi All,
    Currently we are generating the Reports from Essbase Cubes.
    We have an hierarchy in OBIEE and when we are trying to drill down one hierarchy(Tech Executive) we are getting below Error.
    " Error
    View Display Error
    Odbc driver returned an error (SQLExecDirectW).
    Error Details
    Error Codes: OPR4ONWY:U9IM8TAC:OI2DL65P
    State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 43113] Message returned from OBIS. [nQSError: 43119] Query Failed: [nQSError: 96002] Essbase Error: Unknown Member [H1_Rel_TecExec_Ini_appl].[Unknown] used in query (HY000)
    SQL Issued: SELECT s_0, s_1, s_2, s_3, s_4, s_5 FROM ( SELECT 0 s_0, "Defect7M"."H1_Rel_TecExec_Ini_appl"."H1 Initiative Name" s_1, "Defect7M"."H1_Rel_TecExec_Ini_appl"."H1 Tech Executive" s_2, SORTKEY("Defect7M"."H1_Rel_TecExec_Ini_appl"."H1 Initiative Name") s_3, SORTKEY("Defect7M"."H1_Rel_TecExec_Ini_appl"."H1 Tech Executive") s_4, "Defect7M"."Defect7M#1"."Defect7M - measure" s_5 FROM "Defect7M" WHERE ("Defect7M"."H1_Rel_TecExec_Ini_appl"."H1 Tech Executive" = 'Unknown') ) djm "
    Can someone assist me how to resolve this error
    Thanks,
    SatyaB

    Satya,
    Have you done anything to modify the essbase drill logic within your BMM?
    Remember when modeling essbase you should just try to use the defaults first to ensure that all works correctly the first time through. Then you can adjust any hiearchies, federate, etc.

  • Essbase data crossjoin error in OBIEE analysis report

    Hi all,
    Anyone got the following error in OBIEE analysis report:
    Error Codes: OPR4ONWY:U9IM8TAC:OI2DL65P
    State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 43113] Message returned from OBIS. [nQSError: 96002] Essbase Error: Syntax error in input MDX query on line 13 at token 'crossjoin' (HY000)
    The OBIEE version is 11.1.1.6.2
    Data is from Essbase Cube, version 11.1.2
    The report is a simple cross tab table and we added 'After' aggregation to show grand total.
    The error show up when we drill down on dimension, click '+'.
    However, if I remove the 'After' aggregation. There is no error at all
    Thank you
    BCHK

    Hi veeravalli,
    Thank you for you reply. I got it.
    However, any idea to solve the issue?
    I tried to do it in RPD by case when,
    e.g. Acutal Sales: case when scenario='Actual' then salesamount end
    Budget Sales: case when scenario='Budget' then salesamount end
    Actual/Budget%: (Actual Sales/Budget Sales) *100
    So there is no error, Actual Sales and Budget Sales are correct, but Actual/Budget % shows nothing in report
    Thanks.
    BCHK

  • Input Value long enough for date format ,Error in executing parallel query

    Hi,
    My Table: ANML( ID, STATUS,B_DATE,B_MONTH,B_YEAR, DEATH_DATE)
    status 1 for alive and 2 for dead.
    i wrote a view to get age.
    as
    create or relace view view1 as
    select top."ID",top."STATUS",top."DOB",top."DEATH_DATE",top."ANML_AGE",top."DAYSDIFF",
    CASE
    WHEN anml_age < 1
    THEN 'D'
    ELSE 'M'
    END age_unit,
    CASE
    WHEN anml_age < 1
    THEN TO_CHAR (daysdiff || ' Day(s)')
    WHEN anml_age < 12
    THEN TO_CHAR (anml_age || ' Month(s)')
    WHEN MOD (anml_age, 12) = 0
    THEN TO_CHAR (ROUND (anml_age / 12, 0) || ' Year(s) '
    ELSE TO_CHAR ( ROUND (anml_age / 12, 0)
    || ' Year(s) '
    || MOD (anml_age, 12)
    || ' Month(s)'
    END age_string
    from
    (SELECT a.*,
    CASE WHEN status IN ( 1)
    THEN FLOOR(MONTHS_BETWEEN(TRUNC(SYSDATE),dob))
    WHEN death_date IS NOT NULL AND status IN (2)
    THEN FLOOR(MONTHS_BETWEEN(death_date,dob))
    END anml_age,
    CASE WHEN status IN (1)
    THEN FLOOR(TRUNC(SYSDATE)-TRUNC(dob))
    WHEN death_date IS NOT NULL AND status IN (2)
    THEN FLOOR(TRUNC(death_date) - TRUNC(dob))
    END daysdiff
    from (
    SELECTanml.id, status,
    TO_DATE ( DECODE (b_date,
    NULL, 1,
    b_date
    || '-'
    || DECODE (b_month,
    NULL, 1,
    b_month
    || '-'
    || b_year,
    'dd-mm-yyyy'
    ) DOB,
    death_date
    FROM anml
    WHERE b_year IS NOT NULL
    ) a) top
    when i tried to fetch all values from view its working fine.
    But when i tried to fetch values based on condition like as follows,
    select * from view1 where anml_age > 20 and anml_age<30
    I am getting error like:
    Input Value long enough for date format and Error in executing parallel query
    Please tell me wht is wrong.

    Here is your formatted code
    create or relace view view1 as
    select top."ID",top."STATUS",top."DOB",top."DEATH_DATE",top."ANML_AGE",top."DAYSDIFF",
    CASE
    WHEN anml_age < 1
    THEN 'D'
    ELSE 'M'
    END age_unit,
    CASE
    WHEN anml_age < 1
    THEN TO_CHAR (daysdiff || ' Day(s)')
    WHEN anml_age < 12
    THEN TO_CHAR (anml_age || ' Month(s)')
    WHEN MOD (anml_age, 12) = 0
    THEN TO_CHAR (ROUND (anml_age / 12, 0) || ' Year(s) '
    ELSE TO_CHAR ( ROUND (anml_age / 12, 0)
    || ' Year(s) '
    || MOD (anml_age, 12)
    || ' Month(s)'
    END age_string
    from
    (SELECT a.*,
    CASE WHEN status IN ( 1)
    THEN FLOOR(MONTHS_BETWEEN(TRUNC(SYSDATE),dob))
    WHEN death_date IS NOT NULL AND status IN (2)
    THEN FLOOR(MONTHS_BETWEEN(death_date,dob))
    END anml_age,
    CASE WHEN status IN (1)
    THEN FLOOR(TRUNC(SYSDATE)-TRUNC(dob))
    WHEN death_date IS NOT NULL AND status IN (2)
    THEN FLOOR(TRUNC(death_date) - TRUNC(dob))
    END daysdiff
    from (
    SELECTanml.id, status,
    TO_DATE ( DECODE (b_date,
    NULL, 1,
    b_date
    || '-'
    || DECODE (b_month,
    NULL, 1,
    b_month
    || '-'
    || b_year,
    'dd-mm-yyyy'
    ) DOB,
    death_date
    FROM anml
    WHERE b_year IS NOT NULL
    ) a) top

  • Avoid JDBC sender error: Execute statement did not return a result set

    Hi!
    My JDBC sender adapter towards MS SQL server works fine, with an Execute statement calling a stored procedure that returns the source data needed. The stored procedure itself updates the status of database table records, so that only the unread records are returned each time the stored procedure is called.
    However, the communication channel monitoring sets a red flag for the JDBC sender adapter, when there are no values to fetch from the database table (using the stored procedure). Message says: "Database-level error reported by JDBC driver while executing statement 'EXECUTE FetchMessage 1, 9000'. The JDBC driver returned the following error message: 'com.microsoft.sqlserver.jdbc.SQLServerException: The statement did not return a result set.'. For details, contact your database server vendor."
    This is not an error situation, as I do not expect there to be any values to fetch from the database at all times.
    I do not see how to change the stored procedure to avoid this error.
    Is there a parameter to be set on the JDBC adapter that I can use, so the red flag is avoided?
    Thanks for any input!
    Regards,
    Oeystein Emhjellen

    Hi Oeystein Emhjellen.
    The problem is Store Procedure that has to generate always a ResultSet (or cursor). If it doesn't have a output, you have to generate an Empty ResultSet.
    Like a SELECT Statement:
    If there are data, SELECT get an output result but if it get nothing the SELECT Statement get a empty ResultSet.
    Ask to your database team.
    I hope it helps you.
    Bruno.

  • Query returning zero results for yesterdays same hour

    I have the following query:
    SELECT
    d_dtm,
    BTS_ID,
    CASE WHEN D_DTM = (D_DTM-24/24)
    THEN sum(V_ATT_CNT)
    END AS "LASTATT",
    sum(V_ATT_CNT) as "V_ATT_CNT",
    CASE WHEN D_DTM = D_DTM
    THEN sum(V_ATT_CNT)
    END AS "ATT"
    FROM
    DMSN.DS3R_FH_1XRTT_FA_LVL_KPI
    WHERE
    to_date(D_DTM, 'DD/MM/yyyy') >= (SELECT TO_DATE(max(D_DTM),'DD/MM/YYYY') FROM DMSN.DS3R_FH_1XRTT_FA_LVL_KPI)-2
    GROUP BY
    d_dtm,
    BTS_ID
    having
    CASE WHEN D_DTM = (D_DTM-24/24)
    THEN sum(V_ATT_CNT)
    END > 0
    But it is not returning any results because of the "having" clause. I know it should return results because all I want it to do is in one column have the V_ATT for the current time period, and in the 2nd column, have the V_ATT 24 hours ago. I've checked the data and I should get results back but can't seem to figure out why this is not working...
    Edited by: k1ng87 on Apr 22, 2013 1:03 PM

    Hi,
    k1ng87 wrote:
    I have the following query:
    SELECT
    d_dtm,
    BTS_ID,
    CASE WHEN D_DTM = (D_DTM-24/24)
    THEN sum(V_ATT_CNT)
    END AS "LASTATT",
    ...You may have noticed that this site normally doesn't display multiple spaces in a row.
    Whenever you post formatted text (including, but not limited to, code) on this site, type these 6 characters:
    \(small letters only, inside curly brackets) before and after each section of formatted text, to preserve spacing.
    That's just one of many useful things found in the forum FAQ {message:id=9360002}  
    But it is not returning any results because of the "having" clause. You're right:HAVING CASE
         WHEN d_dtm = (d_dtm - 24/24)
         THEN SUM (v_att_cnt)
         END > 0
    Whatever d_dtm is, it's not d_dtm - 24/24, so the WHEN condition will never be TRUE.  That means the CASE expression will always return NULL, and NULL is not greater than 0, so the HAVING condition will never be TRUE.
    k1ng87 wrote:
    confused on what I'm missing here...I'm using version 11g, not sure if that matters for this ? though....There is no version 11f or 11h, so it's kind of silly to say you're using 11g.  Why not give your actual version number, like 11.2.0.2.0?  Sometimes, the part after 11 makes a huge difference.
    But probably not in this case, as you said.   What's more important is for you to post CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements for a little sample data, and the results you want from that sample data.
    No kidding; see the forum FAQ {message:id=9360002}.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

  • Simple query returns wrong results in Sql 2012

    On my Windows 8 box running Sql 2012 11.0.3128, this query returns an IncludeCount of 0 and an ExcludeCount of 1.
    On my Windows 7 box running Sql 2008 10.50.2550 this query returns an IncludeCount of 3 and an ExcludeCount of 1, which is correct.
    In short, it runs properly on these versions of OS and Sql's:
    Windows 2008 R2 + Sql 10.50.2550
    Windows 2008 R2 + Sql 10.50.4000
    Windows 2012 SP1 + Sql 11.0.3000
    Windows 7 + Sql 11.0.2100
    And gives incorrect results on these OS's and Sql's (so far, tested):
    Windows 8 Enterprise + Sql 11.0.3128
    Windows 2008 R2 + Sql 10.50.2550
    I wondered if anyone else can reproduce this?  I can't figure out the magic combination of OS and SQL version this breaks on.
    In all scenarios, the resulting @filters table is populated correctly, and the [Include] column is properly set to a 1 or a 0, so why aren't the other variables being properly set?
    If I change the [ID] column to NONCLUSTERED, it works fine, too.  It doesn't matter if @filters is a TVP or a temp table or an actual table, same (incorrect) results in each case.
    DECLARE @filters TABLE([ID] bigint PRIMARY KEY, [Include] bit)
    DECLARE @excludecount int = 0
    DECLARE @includecount int = 0
    DECLARE @id bigint
    INSERT INTO @filters ([ID])
    VALUES (1), (3), (4), (-7)
    UPDATE @filters SET
        @id = [ID],
        @includecount = @includecount + (CASE WHEN @id > 0 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END),
        @excludecount = @excludecount + (CASE WHEN @id < 0 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END),
        [Include] = CASE WHEN @id > 0 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END,
        [ID] = ABS(@id)
    SELECT @includecount as IncludeCount, @excludecount as ExcludeCount
    SELECT * FROM @filters

    What part is undocumented?
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms177523.aspx
    The above link states I can update variables inside an UPDATE statement ...
    But it does not say what the correct result of what you are trying to would be. Variable assignment in UPDATE only makes sense if the UPDATE hits one row. If the UPDATE matches several rows, which value you the variable is set to is not defined.
    It gets even more complicated when you have the variable on both sides of the expression. But I'd say that the only two values that makes as the final value of @includecount 0. An UPDATE statement, like other DML statements in SQL, is logically defined
    as all-at-once. There are no intermediate results. Therefore the only possible values are the initial value of @includecount plus the value of the CASE statement, which always should returns 0, since @id is NULL when the UPDATE statement starts to execute.
    I'm afraid that what you have is nonsense from a language perspective, and the result is undefined. Whenever you get different results from a query depending on whether you have certain indexes in place, you know that the query is indeterministic. There
    are certainly part of SQL that are indeterministic, for instance ORDER BY on a non-unique columns. But in this particular case you have also wandered out into the land that is also undefined.
    I'm not sure what you are trying to achieve, but I can only advice you to go back to the drawing board.
    Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, [email protected]

  • Query returning No result

    Hi,
    I installed Oracle Express Edition 10g in my system.
    I ran a very simple query:
    Select * from person where status = 100
    where status is NUMBER(9) NOT NULL but it does not returning any result.
    Any Idea? Is this because of Express Edition version?
    Thank You.

    You've been asked twice to show us a copy/paste of a query which you've not done.
    Fire up SQLPlus, run the command asked of you, and copy and then paste the results into a post (enclosing it in the tags to preserve formatting).
    It's much easier to help you when you try and help us by following along with suggestions.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           

  • CAML Query returning no result

    I have this CAML query running fine on my local dev machine, but on live production machine, it returns zero result.
    <Where>
    <And>
    <Geq><FieldRef Name='Created' /><Value Type='DateTime'>[Today-60Day(s)]</Value></Geq>
    <And>
    <Contains><FieldRef Name='Author' /><Value Type='User'>Phil Smith</Value></Contains>
    <And>
    <IsNotNull><FieldRef Name='Customer' /></IsNotNull>
    <Or>
    <IsNotNull><FieldRef Name='_x0031_Quantity' /></IsNotNull>
    <Or>
    <IsNotNull><FieldRef Name='_x0032_Quantity' /></IsNotNull>
    <Or>
    <IsNotNull><FieldRef Name='_x0033_Quantity' /></IsNotNull>
    <IsNotNull><FieldRef Name='_x0034_Quantity' /></IsNotNull>
    </Or>
    </Or>
    </Or>
    </And>
    </And>
    </And>
    </Where>
    I even run it in CAML Query builder on Live machine and it does return result, but it's just in code, it's not returning anything. The code is as follow:
    spQuery.Query = String.Format("<Where>" +
    "<And>" +
    "<Geq>" +
    "<FieldRef Name='Created' />" +
    "<Value Type='DateTime'>[Today-60Day(s)]</Value>" +
    "</Geq>" +
    "<And>" +
    "<Contains>" +
    "<FieldRef Name='Author' />" +
    "<Value Type='User'>{0}</Value>" +
    "</Contains> " +
    "<And>" +
    "<IsNotNull><FieldRef Name='Customer' /></IsNotNull>" +
    "<Or>" +
    "<IsNotNull><FieldRef Name='_x0031_Quantity' /></IsNotNull>" +
    "<Or>" +
    "<IsNotNull><FieldRef Name='_x0032_Quantity' /></IsNotNull>" +
    "<Or>" +
    "<IsNotNull><FieldRef Name='_x0033_Quantity' /></IsNotNull>" +
    "<IsNotNull><FieldRef Name='_x0034_Quantity' /></IsNotNull>" +
    "</Or>" +
    "</Or>" +
    "</Or>" +
    "</And>" +
    "</And>" +
    "</And>" +
    "</Where>", myWeb.CurrentUser.Name);
    SPListItemCollection result = oPriceList.GetItems(spQuery);
    if (result.Count > 0)

    Instead of "<Value Type='DateTime'>[Today-60Day(s)]</Value>", Could you try with the following:
    <Value Type='DateTime'><Today OffsetDays="-60"/></Value>"
    Also,
    it is better to debug the code and see the value of caml string during runtime (rather than seeing the values in caml buider).
    Thanks Arut

  • Problems with EVGET not Returning Correct Results

    We have several reports with EVGETs that are not working.  It seems to be limited to gets on a particular datasrc when getting members at the base level.  Here is an example.
    Application: Budgeting
    Deptid: D_07104
    Account: A_612080
    Product: P_070040
    Project: PJ_NOPROJ
    Time: 2009.APR
    Datasrc; ACTUALS
    Category: INPUT
    At this point, all the members above are base level members.  A standard EVGET will not return results at this intersection even though there is data.  If we change any of the following (Deptid, product, time, or category) to a parent level member, data will be returned.  Another action we can take to get data to return is open a new worksheet and write the same EVGET on the same intersection and it will return results.  If we go back to the original sheet edit each formula and hit enter it will return the correct results.  If we refresh the sheet, the results will disappear.  We have also tried EVGTS and get similar results.
    Another thing we have tried is copying a month of data from datasrc (ACTUALS) and category (INPUT) to datasrc (NEW_ACTUALS) and category (NEW_INPUT) through the BPC delivered copy.  That seems to work.  I don't know if the copy does something to load the data that we are missing.  We also updated our fact table with a SQL update changing the datasrc and category the same way and processed the application and the data would return through some EVGETs and not others.

    This issue can happen when you have for onde dimension multiple hierachies and something is wrong into hierachies.
    Usually you have dimension formula where you are trying to do calculation of a member from H1 using members from H2.
    This it is an example but it can be other possible errors.
    Any way for sure your issue is related to one dimension having multiple hierachies.
    Regards
    Sorin Radulescu

  • ADDT not returning correct results

    Hello
    SELECT tblTraders.trader_company AS trader_ref, tblTrades.trade_name AS trade_ref, tblT2t.t2t_id
    FROM (tblT2t LEFT JOIN tblTraders ON tblT2t.trader_ref = tblTraders.trader_id) LEFT JOIN tblTrades ON tblT2t.trade_ref = tblTrades.trade_id
    WHERE {$NXTFilter_rstblT2t1}
    ORDER BY {$NXTSort_rstblT2t1}
    With reference to the above SQL statement generated while using dynamic list wizard, the SQL does not return the correct results.
    Sadly the SQL does not retrieve the field "trade_ref" and is blank when the "test" button is used.
    Anyone got any ideas?
    Cheers
    Paul

    Hi Paul,
    does this query return the correct results when loading the page in a browser ?
    Cheers,
    Günter

  • Problem with OBIEE generated query

    Hi All,
    I'm working on OBIEE 10.1.3.4 version. For generating one report am using five tables , in thses five tables 2 are the fact tables and remaining all are dimensional tables.
    In these five tables am using one or more colums in each table and we joined properly for these five tables(we are not getting any error on these joins). The problem is when ever i get query from OBIEE (Administration--->Manage sessions) its not generating a single query , instead of single query its splits into more queries..
    Why its not generating the single query ,we are assuming that beacause of these reports are taking time to show the results.
    Could you pls suggest me why i'm facing these and also i have these problem for only one report for remainig reports OBIEE is generating sine query.

    Hi,
    Please refer : multiple queries for single report
    Why multiple queries ?
    when we can find the multiple queries in view logn
    Thanks,
    Saichand.v

  • Data display error in reports

    Hi,
    I've a serious problem. I've developed a new database.I've imported a .dmp backup file into my user from my previous database which was same although only certain new options have been added in the new database. The problem is I'm able to view all data but when i try to retrieve old data through reports, they aren't being displayed.If i enter any new data, they are displayed through reports but not the old data that were in the .dmp files.
    What could be the error?

    What happens If you try to run the same query from your reports in sql?

Maybe you are looking for

  • Do I need to keep the Capsule plugged in to my cable modem in order to use it for backup?

    The location of my cable modem is really inconvenient. I'd like to move the Capsule to a different room. Do I need to keep it connected to the cable modem in order to be able to use it as my Time Machine backup device?

  • Can weblogic server 5.1 version work with Oracle 9.2.0 thin JDBC driver?

    we have an applicaiton using weblogic 5.1 and Oracle database 8.1.6. Is that possible to upgrade databse version to Oracle 9i without weblogic upgrade? If yes, what JDBC driver should be used? Oracle 9.2.0 thin JDBC driver or weblogic jDriver? Is the

  • NetWeaver Java Requirements

    Hi I am wanting to install the sneak preview of NetWeaver 04 Sp16 and have just noticed that the Sun Java SDK requirement is rather specific(1.4.2_08).  I have 1.4.2_01 installed.  Is this going to be OK?  The NetWeaver notes mention that "1.4.2_10 m

  • Trying to install media encoder cs6

    Unfortunately, my system runs on Snow Leopard(10.6). I found out only too late that the media encoder CC did not work on that OS. Now, I am trying to go back to CS6, but I can't because the apps are no longer available for me on my Applications Manag

  • Sos-mode-recovery Cisco SPA50xG

    We had a technician  unplug a SPA504G  will provisioning and Ugrading Firmware. I downloaded the SOS Utility for the Solution. But the Device will not go out of SOS mode. For me use the utility https://supportforums.cisco.com/document/37666/spa50xg-i