Data Retrieval in Company Acquisition Scenario

Hello,
Scenario:
Group1 (XYZ) owning three companies C1, C2 and C3.
Group2 (ABC) is taking over above company C3.
Group XYZ has implemented SAP for its three companies C1, C2 and C3 in single SAP system (Single Client) and has 3 different company codes.
Another group ABC is taking over company C3 of group XYZ.
Group ABC has yet not implemented SAP.
Requirement:
As C3 is taken over by group ABC, we need to retrieve data pertaining to only C3 from SAP system of group XYZ.
With standard System copy or client copy concept, retrieval of data on company code level is not possible.
Please suggest me alternate way for above case.
Thanks,
Nirav Shah.

hi,
use second. index tables:
customers:  BSAD
vendors:    BSAK
G/L acc.:   BSAS
sample:
  SELECT (felder) FROM  bsad into TABLE stab
         WHERE  bukrs  = bukrs
         AND    kunnr  IN kunnr
         AND    gsber IN gsber
         AND    augbl  <>  space
         AND    hkont  IN akont
         AND    augdt GT p_date.
regards Andreas
Message was edited by: Andreas Mann

Similar Messages

  • WAD : Result set is too large; data retrieval restricted by configuration

    Hi All,
    When trying to execute the web template by giving less restiction we are getting the below error :
    Result set is too large; data retrieval restricted by configuration
    Result set too large (758992 cells); data retrieval restricted by configuration (maximum = 500000 cells)
    But when we try to increase the number of restictions it is giving output. For example if we give fiscal period, company code ann Brand we are able to get output. But if we give fical period alone it it throwing the above error.
    Note : We are in SP18.
    Whether do we need to change some setting in configuration? If we yes where do we need to change or what else we need to do to remove this error
    Regards
    Karthik

    Hi Karthik,
    the standard setting for web templates is to display a maximum amount of 50.000 cells. The less you restrict your query the more data will be displayed in the report. If you want to display more than 50.000 cells the template will not be executed correctly.
    In general it is advisable to restrict the query as much as possible. The more data you display the worse your performance will be. If you have to display more data and you execute the query from query designer or if you use the standard template you can individually set the maximum amount of cells. This is described over  [here|Re: Bex Web 7.0 cells overflow].
    However I do not know if (and how) you can set the maximum amount of cells differently as a default setting for your template. This should be possible somehow I think, if you find a solution for this please let us know.
    Brgds,
    Marcel

  • SAP HR DATA Retrieval into LDAP

    Hi ,
    Does anyone have an idea for extracting SAP HR Employee data into LDAP (Directory based service).
    Rohit

    <b>Option 1:</b>
    Replicate HR employee data to the directory directly:
    <a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/8e/b98c3b98b8704fe10000000a114084/frameset.htm">HR Data Retrieval in an LDAP-Enabled Directory Service</a>
    <b>Option 2:</b>
    Create users for your employees (which might be used for ESS scenarios anyway) using infotype 0105 and transaction HRUSER and transfer these users into the directory.
    <a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/95/49cb3a663bfc70e10000000a114084/frameset.htm">Synchronization of SAP User Administration with an LDAP-Compatible Directory Service</a>
    <b>Option 3:</b>
    Use an external identity Management solution
    e.g. <a href="http://service.sap.com/siemensdirx">Siemens DirX Identity</a>
    Kind regards
    Frank Buchholz

  • Data Retrieval from Cluster Table - BSEG

    Hi all,
    I need to retreive data related to document line items from BSEG whose CLEARING DATE (AUGDT) is greater than a user given date for TWO COMPANY CODES (say 0010/0200).
    as BSEG is a cluster table, it has huge data and taking large amt of time can anybody suggest a better way of retrieving data for the above conditions(fastly)
    Thanks in Advance,
    Lakshmi

    hi,
    use second. index tables:
    customers:  BSAD
    vendors:    BSAK
    G/L acc.:   BSAS
    sample:
      SELECT (felder) FROM  bsad into TABLE stab
             WHERE  bukrs  = bukrs
             AND    kunnr  IN kunnr
             AND    gsber IN gsber
             AND    augbl  <>  space
             AND    hkont  IN akont
             AND    augdt GT p_date.
    regards Andreas
    Message was edited by: Andreas Mann

  • Migrating 3 company codes data to 1 company code.

    Hi all,
    We are one legal entity, imparting educational training and operating its activities at three locations namely Gurgaon, Dehradun and
    Rajamundary. In addition it has two administrative offices at Delhi and Mumbai besides a few other rented premises.
    The implementation team has created one company as XYZ and created three separate company codes for each of the operational unit at Gurgaon, Dehradun and Rajamundary. All the existing company codes have been assigned to one Chart of Account. The operating units are neither independent legal entities nor are required to generate location-wise Final Accounts.
    However the existing system is not meeting our requirement and we wish to operate thru one company code only.
    Accordingly we plan to generate one more company code and migrate all the data from existing three company codes to this new one on a pre fix
    cut off date. After that we will record all the transactions in this new
    company code only and the existing codes would not be used further.
    In this regard please advise us the steps required to be followed to migrate the  combined data of three company codes to one company code.
    Kind Regards,
    Sudhanshu
    Edited by: Sudhanshu Sharma on Feb 11, 2008 11:38 AM

    please find some info on SAP SLO
    Sell-off of parts of the company
    A company group sells the portfolio of one of its divisions to another company. As a result, the data that relates to the sold company division must be removed from the group’s SAP system, and transferred to the new owner.
    With the "client separation” service, SLO offers two possible approaches to the solution. Either the data that the sold part of the company needs is migrated to a new client using one of the data transfer methods (Legacy System Migration Workbench or Migration Workbench), or a client copy is created for the sold part of the company, and the data that the parent company no longer requires is removed from the client copy using the SLO service "delete company code.”
    Company merger
    A company buys or takes over another company. The acquired company uses a different material numbering system than the buying company, for example. However, from the point of acquisition on, the same material numbers must be used, and it is therefore necessary to change the material numbers of the bought company.
    With the SLO conversion service "material number conversion,” the material numbers of the bought company are changed so that they correspond to the naming conventions used in the parent company. This is done using the Conversion Workbench.
    Reorganization/restructuring in the company
    A company was previously organized according to regions, and based its SAP system on this structure. However, an analysis of business processes reveals that a central, function-based organization would considerably increase efficiency in controlling. As a result, the controlling areas used to map the structure of the company in the SAP system must be adjusted accordingly.
    With the help of the SLO service "controlling area merge” and the Conversion Workbench, the old controlling areas, which were set up on a regional basis, can be merged into central units.
    Optimization of business processes
    In a government department, different standard charts of accounts are used for external and internal financial reporting. The duplicate work that this entails is becoming increasingly time-consuming and error-prone. The managers responsible decide that the external chart of accounts could also be used internally. As a result, the chart of account in the government department’s SAP system must be adjusted to reflect this change.
    The SLO conversion service "chart of account conversion” makes it possible to rename or merge accounts and cost elements in the chart of account so that they meet the new requirements. The assignment table in which the changes are defined is retained in the SAP system after conversion for documentation purposes – for an external audit, for example.
    http://www.sap.info/public/INT/int/index/Category-12613c61affe7a5bc-int/-1/articleContainer-70353ed226f24a312

  • Extract data of a company within the same client.

    Hi gurus. If I have more than one company configured in the same client in the ERP, Is there any way to extract data of only one of those companys in order to transfer or copy this information in other ERP?.
    I've listened about TDMS but I'm looking for any procedure or tool that ensure that only the data of one company of multiples is extracted.
    Thanks a lot!. Greetings from Colombia.

    Hi,
    Could you please clarify what all data you want to extract. Is it master data ?
    Incase you want to extract master data to any external system you can you SAP standard IDOCs using ALE.
    Also you can put a filter in the distribution model to filter the extract data only to relvant company codes.
    Thanks
    Neel

  • Query Error Information: Result set is too large; data retrieval ......

    Hi Experts,
    I got one problem with my query information. when Im executing my report and drill my info in my navigation panel, Instead of a table with values the message "Result set is too large; data retrieval restricted by configuration" appears. I already applied "Note 1127156 - Safety belt: Result set is too large". I imported Support Package 13 for SAP NetWeaver 7. 0 BI Java (BIIBC13_0.SCA / BIBASES13_0.SCA / BIWEBAPP13_0.SCA) and executed the program SAP_RSADMIN_MAINTAIN (in transaction SE38), with the object and the value like Note 1127156 says... but the problem still appears....
    what Should I be missing ??????  How can I fix this issue ????
    Thank you very much for helping me out..... (Any help would be rewarded)
    David Corté

    You may ask your basis guy to increase ESM buffer (rsdb/esm/buffersize_kb). Did you check the systems memory?
    Did you try to check the error dump using ST22 - Runtime error analysis?
    Edited by: ashok saha on Feb 27, 2008 10:27 PM

  • Result set is too large; data retrieval restricted by configuration

    Hi,
    While executing query for a given period, 'Result set is too large; data retrieval restricted by configuration' message is getting displayed. I had searched in SDN and I had referred the following link:
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/d047e1a1-ad5d-2c10-5cb1-f4ff99fc63c4&overridelayout=true
    Steps followed:
    1) Transaction Code SE38
    2) In the program field, entered the report name SAP_RSADMIN_MAINTAIN and Executed.
    3) For OBJECT, entered the following parameters: BICS_DA_RESULT_SET_LIMIT_MAX
    4) For VALUE, entered the value for the size of the result set, and then executed the program:
    After the said steps, the below message is displayed:
    OLD SETTING:
    OBJECT =                                VALUE =
    UPDATE failed because there is no record
    OBJECT = BICS_DA_RESULT_SET_LIMIT_MAX
    Similar message is displayed for Object: BICS_DA_RESULT_SET_LIMIT_DEF.
    Please let me know as to how to proceed on this.
    Thanks in advance.

    Thanks for the reply!
    The objects are not available in the RSADMIN table.

  • Problem in GRN while Capturing Excise Invoice in Cross Company STO Scenario

    Dear All,
    In the Cross Company STO Scenario we are following the steps as below:-
    1.) Creation of the purchase order to the supplying plant of type u201CNBu201D
    2.) Creation of the Outbound delivery in VL10B
    3.) Post Good Issue in the VL02N.
    4.) Creation of the billing doc.
    5.) Creation of the Excise Invoice.
    6.) MIGO w.r.t to the Outbound delivery in the receiving plant
    During MIGO ,initialy system is picking the excise rates and excise base value by its own from the purchase order and the moment  when we refer the Excise Excise Invoice created in the supplying plant , system takes the Excise rates from the excise invoice created in the supplying plant and Excise Base value is becoming ZERO and we are getting the error :u201D *Please check excise base for the item is ZERO
    Message no : 4F121
    Please Suggest what to do and why this error is coming.
    When I am giving any other Excise no is the Excise Invoice feild in MIGO , it is taking and refering the rates in PO and giving one information message that Excise invoice no is different from the supplying plant excise invoice no.
    Thanks & Regards
    Nitin

    HI,
    Check the excise base vlaue in the Supplying plant excise invoice. If its 0, maintain the assessible value in J1ID & Check.
    If everything is found OK,  check if any SAP notes are available.
    Thanks & Regards,

  • Real tough data retrieval - assistance needed

    Late 2011 Macbook Pro with 500GB hard drive
    Lion 10.7
    One morning out of absolutely nowhere I get this grey screen with a flashing question mark folder. I take it to the geniuses at the Apple store and they tell me my hard drive has failed (no explanation). My mac is under warranty so they gave me a new hard drive for free, bagged my old hard drive and told me "good luck" retrieving the data.
    I'm on a mission to retrieve the data without paying for services. I have never retrieved data before but I've been doing a lot of forum reading and I have been getting protips from an IT friend who has saved my PC data before.
    As of now, I have been unable to even access the hard drive and so I am reaching out to the community to help me conquer this project.
    the problem is not the OS (according to Apple store)
    when hooking up with the dongle, neither Finder nor Disk Utility detect the bad drive
    the drive will spin when forced by the dongle (so I've ruled out the freezer method)
    I was advised (by friends and forums alike) to download so powerful data retrieval software:
    Data Rescue [did not detect bad external drive]
    Disk Drill [did not detect bad external drive]
    TestDisk (http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/TestDisk) [I can get it up and running but I have no idea how to use this software]
    So that seems to be the big problem, when I hook up my failed drive as an external hard drive, there is no acknowledgement from my MBP that it is connected and as such data recovery programs cannot access it. When I still had it installed in my computer, there was no clicking sound and it doesn't seem like any of the components are jammed up as it still spins.
    Where do I go from here? Please keep in mind that I am new to resolving my own technical problems but I'm willing to learn. Tired of being one of those people who look at computer parts and get anxious.
    NOTE: I haven't tried Target Mode as I do not have a firewire cable or access to another mac (yet). If you think I should try this, please let me know.

    A hard drive that will not divulge BOTH its Make&Model and a reasonable size/capacity to the likes of Disk Utility and data rescue programs has died, and connot be repaired with any software.
    Target Disk mode will not improve anything. The drive is read as a Mac Volume by software. If it won't mount under Mac OS X, it won't mount under Target Disk Mode.

  • Document date is earlier than acquisition date for asset

    Client has an asset which they want to post an acquistion for as of 1/1/2011. They are in December of 2011. They first put an acquisition in with 12/31/2011 and then cancelled it, realizing they needed a docdate of 1/1/2011. When they try to redo the acquisition with a docdate of 1/1/2011 they get the error "Document date is earlier than acquisition date for asset xxxxx"
    The capitalization date on the asset is 1/1/2011. I looked at the acquisition date (thorugh SQL) and it is "1899-12-30 00:00:00.000"
    Does anyone know why it is preventing from posting?
    (Posting dates allowed are 1/1/11-12/31/11 for period 12 of 2011 and the period is unlocked)
    Alan

    Hi
    I do believe that the problem is in the capitalization date 12/31/2011
    Even if you have cancellled the first acqusition , and the acquisition date has taken the dummy date that assets have when there are no acqusitions 1899-12-30 00:00:00.000
    Still the capitalization date remains 12/31/2011
    and this will deter any transactions earlier than 12/31/2011
    My question is,
    can you still edit the field capitalization date?
    Jose Antonio Castillo

  • Error in cross company STO scenario

    Hi All,
    We have a cross company STO scenario. When I try to create the PO (document type NB) I get an error that
    "Customer XYZ does not exist (please change entry in plant ABCD)"
    I have rightly assigned the customer XYZ to the plant ABCD as required in the IMG node Set up for stock transport order. Also the customer XYZ has been created. But I don't know why the system gives this error even when the customer has been created properly.
    After debugging I found that this is because of some missing value in the field CCOMP (Stock tranfer category) in the EKPO table.
    What is this stock transfer category? Am I missing some configuration here?
    Regards,
    V S

    Hi,
    Please check the following details;
    Material should exist in both the plants (Delivering  & Ordering),
    Internal customer should be assigned to the ordering plant ( MM -> Purchasing -> Purchase Order -> Setup stock transport order -> assign the internal customer to the ordering plant and assign the Sales area of the internal customer.
    Assign its Sales area to the delivering plant
    Assign the document type and Delivery type  NB and NLCC
    Assign the Supplying plant --> Receiving Plant --> NB
    Take the delivering plant and assign the sales area.
    Vendor master has to be created and assaign the supply source ( Delivering Plant).
    Create a puchase order ME21N ---> Save
    Regards,
    Tushar Patankar

  • Should I use a data retrieval service or software to recover data ?

    Please pardon the length of this post.
    Here's the setup for our office:
    Computer 1:
    10.4.8 OS X
    1 GHZ PowerPC G4: silver grey tower, grey apple
    1MB L3 Cache
    256 MB DDR SDRAM
    Computer 2:
    10.4.8 OS X
    Dual 450 MHZ PowerPC G4: blue grey tower, blue apple
    256 MB SDRAM
    Computer 3:
    10.4.8 OS X
    1 GHZ PowerPC G4 IMac Flat Screen:
    256 MB DDR SDRAM
    I have 2 LaCie Big Disk d2 Extremes daisy chained and connected to the IMac. We use the first to store all of our data to keep our local disks free. The second d2 is the backup to the first. The other 2 computers connect to the d2's via an ethernet hub. The d2's are each partitioned into 4 compartments.
    A couple of days ago I started the system up when I got in in the morning, and the main d2 would not open. I ran disk utility, but it said that the drive was damaged beyond it's ability to repair. I ran DiskWarrior, and it gave me this message:
    "The directory of disk 'G4' cannot be rebuilt. The disk was not modified. The original directory is too severely damaged. It appears another disk utility has erased critical directory information. (3004, 2176)."
    I contacted Disk Warrior tech support and after a series of exchanges that had me send him dated extracted from the terminal function, he said this:
    "It appears that the concatenated RAID inside your LaCie
    drive has failed (your 500GB drive is actually 2 250GB
    hard drives). That is why we only saw 2 partitions
    on "disk3". A possible cause could be a failed bridge
    in the case.
    You may be looking at sending this drive to a data recovery service.
    However, it is possible that we may be able to recover data
    from the partitions that we CAN see. What we would be doing would cause no damage to your data
    unless the hard drives were having a mechanical failure (ie, the
    head crashed and was contacting the platters, similar to scratching
    a record). But from what I've seen, I don't feel that is the case.
    I believe the piece of hardware that 'bridges' the two drives to
    make them act as one has failed. that's why we can only see data
    about 1 of the 2 drives in the case.
    We would only be attempting to gather data off the drive. Since
    data recovery services sometimes charge for amount of data retrieved,
    it's up to you how you want to proceed."
    Most of the data from the past 5 years for our business stands at being lost. Only some of it had been properly backed up on the second drive, due to some back up software issues. I want to do whatever I can to retrieve all of, or at least some of the data. From what the Alsoft technician said, do you think that the data recovery software available to the consumer is going to be robust enough to retrieve at least the data from the one disk in the drive that is recognizable (there are 2 250gig disks in the d2X. Only one is responding at all). If so, do these Softwares further damage the disks? Or should I just send the drive to a data recovery service?
    I'd like to try to extract some of it myself via over the counter retrieval software, but I don't know whether to trust these programs?
    Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks in advance.
    Peter McConnell
    1 GHZ PowerPC G4 IMac Flat Screen   Mac OS X (10.4.8)   Posted

    Peter
    My 2 cents:
    I have used FileSalvage
    http://www.subrosasoft.com/OSXSoftware/index.php?mainpage=product_info&productsid=1
    to recover files from damaged disks. It works as advertised, within limits. Some files may be too damaged to recover. More importantly yo get to scan the disk before actually recovering, and it will give you a list of what it thinks it can recover.
    My experience was that it recovered approx 85% of the data.
    YMMV but they do have a trial.
    Regards
    TD

  • Report Developed in Webi Rich Client Consuming more time in Data Retrieval

    Dear All,
    I am a BO Consultant, recently in my project I have developed one report in Webi Rich Client., at the time of development and subsequent days the report was working fine (taking Data Retrieval time less than 1 minute), but after some days its taking much time (increasing day by day and now its taking more than 11 minutes).
    Can anybody point out what could be the reason?????
    We are using,
    1. SAP BI 7.0
    2. SAP BO XI 3.1 Edge
    3. Webi Rich Client Version :12.3.0 and Build 601
    This report is made on a Multiprovider (Sales).
    What are the important points that should be considered so that we can improve the performance of Webi Reports????
    Waiting for a suitable solution.....................
    Regards,
    Arun Krishnan.G
    SAP BO Consultant
    Edited by: ArunKG on Oct 11, 2011 3:50 PM

    Hi,
    Please come back here with a copy/paste of the 2 MDX statements from the MDA.log to compare the good/bad runtimes.
    & the 2 equivalent DPCOMMANDS clauses (good and bad) from the WebI trace logs.
    Can u explain what u really mean in the bold text above..................Actually I didn't get you..........
    Pardon, I have only 3 months experience in BO.
    Regards,
    Arun
    Edited by: ArunKG on Oct 11, 2011 4:28 PM

  • Excise duty: error 9914 No material data maintained for company code

    Dear all,
    when executing transaction /BEV2/EDDS I get error 9914 No material data maintained for company code in some material documents.
    However, I see material is correct.
    Can you tell me which views of material master am I missing?
    What do I need to check?
    Thanks in advance,
    F

    Settings in material master "Basic view 1"

Maybe you are looking for