Date effectivity - ECM

Dear All,
I am working on ECM using date effectivity.
I create a change master with date effectivity. But when I make changes to BOM using this change number the effects are not getting reflected.
For eg. I create a change request ( change no.) with effectivity type. I give the validity lower limit as 05.07.2007 date also upper limit as 05.07.2007 date i.e.if I make changes to BOM using this change no. should be valid for 05.07.2007 only. i.e. if I add a component in BOM that component should be displayed in production order which I create on 05.07.2007.
But this is not happening.
Please guide me in this.
Regards,
Sagar Deolalikar

HI
CC01 initial screen when choose "With Release key" option then no need to
attach an objects to the ECR/ECO, Tik/select only "Actv" "Object" MgtRec"
use the change number to change the object BOM/Routing, i.e. until you release the Change Number you don't see the change in Production order.
This is the relevancy of Release key in ECM.
When you lock the release key, i.e. you cannot make the changes affect in the production order or in OCM i.e order change management. So locking prevents you to make affect of changes in OCM.
similarly for costing, Planning & Global.
Regards
Rehman

Similar Messages

Date Effective SDO and named bind variable

Hi.
I have a problem with named bind variable in date effective ADF Business Component (:Bind_SysEffectiveDate).
Service interface of my EmployeeHistorySDO has next methods:
getEmployeeHistoryView1
updateEmployeeHistoryView1
findEmployeeHistoryView1
createEmployeeHistoryView1
deleteEmployeeHistoryView1
If I invoke getEmployeeHistoryView1 method I'm getting next SQL statement:
[332] EmployeeHistoryView1 ViewRowSetImpl.doSetWhereClause(-1, SysEffectiveDateBindVar, null)
[333] EmployeeHistoryView1 ViewRowSetImpl.doSetWhereClause(-1, SysEffectiveDateBindVar, null)
[334] Column count: 7
[335] EmployeeHistoryView_0_findByKey_ ViewRowSetImpl.doSetWhereClause(-1, SysEffectiveDateBindVar, null)
[336] EmployeeHistoryView_0_findByKey_ ViewRowSetImpl.setWhereClauseParams caused params changed
[337] EmployeeHistoryView1 ViewRowSetImpl.doSetWhereClause(-1, SysEffectiveDateBindVar, null)
[338] EmployeeHistoryView_0_findByKey_ ViewRowSetImpl.setWhereClauseParams caused params changed
[339] EmployeeHistoryView_0_findByKey_ ViewRowSetImpl.setWhereClauseParams caused params changed
[340] EmployeeHistoryView_0_findByKey_ ViewRowSetImpl.setWhereClauseParams caused params changed
[341] EmployeeHistoryView_0_findByKey_ ViewRowSetImpl.doSetWhereClause(-1, SysEffectiveDateBindVar, null)
[342] EmployeeHistoryView_0_findByKey_ ViewRowSetImpl.setNamedWhereClauseParam(SysEffectiveDateBindVar, null)
[343] EmployeeHistoryView_0_findByKey_ ViewRowSetImpl.doSetWhereClause(-1, fbkKy__0, null)
[344] EmployeeHistoryView_0_findByKey_ ViewRowSetImpl.setNamedWhereClauseParam(fbkKy__0, 3)
[345] EmployeeHistoryView_0_findByKey_ ViewRowSetImpl.setNamedWhereClauseParam(SysEffectiveDateBindVar, 2010-10-01)
[346] EmployeeHistoryView_0_findByKey_ ViewRowSetImpl.doSetWhereClause(-1, SysEffectiveDateBindVar, 2010-10-01)
[347] EmployeeHistoryView_0_findByKey_ ViewRowSetImpl.doSetWhereClause(-1, fbkKy__0, 3)
[348] EmployeeHistoryView_0_findByKey_ ViewRowSetImpl.execute caused params to be "un"changed
[349] Column count: 7
[350] EmployeeHistoryView_0_findByKey_ ViewRowSetImpl.doSetWhereClause(-1, SysEffectiveDateBindVar, 2010-10-01)
[351] EmployeeHistoryView_0_findByKey_ ViewRowSetImpl.doSetWhereClause(-1, fbkKy__0, 3)
[352] executeQueryForCollection ViewObject:EmployeeHistoryView_0_findByKey_, RowSet:EmployeeHistoryView_0_findByKey_
[353] ViewObject: [com.test.sdo.dateeffective.employee.history.EmployeeHistoryView]EmplHistoryAppModule.EmployeeHistoryView_0_findByKey_ close prepared statements...
[354] ViewObject: [com.test.sdo.dateeffective.employee.history.EmployeeHistoryView]EmplHistoryAppModule.EmployeeHistoryView_0_findByKey_ Created new QUERY statement
[355] EmployeeHistoryView_0_findByKey_>#q computed SQLStmtBufLen: 403, actual=380, storing=410
[356] SELECT EmployeeHistory.HISTORY_ID,         EmployeeHistory.POSITION,         EmployeeHistory.WAGE,         EmployeeHistory.EMPL_ID,         EmployeeHistory.START_DATE,         EmployeeHistory.END_DATE FROM EMPLOYEE_HISTORY EmployeeHistory WHERE (EmployeeHistory.HISTORY_ID = :fbkKy__0) AND (:SysEffectiveDateBindVar BETWEEN EmployeeHistory.START_DATE AND EmployeeHistory.END_DATE)
[357] pStmt = conn.prepareStatement("SELECT EmployeeHistory.HISTORY_ID, EmployeeHistory.POSITION, EmployeeHistory.WAGE, EmployeeHistory.EMPL_ID, EmployeeHistory.START_DATE, EmployeeHistory.END_DATE FROM EMPLOYEE_HISTORY EmployeeHistory WHERE (EmployeeHistory.HISTORY_ID = :fbkKy__0) AND (:SysEffectiveDateBindVar BETWEEN EmployeeHistory.START_DATE AND EmployeeHistory.END_DATE)"); // JBO-JDBC-INTERACT
[358] Bind params for ViewObject: [com.test.sdo.dateeffective.employee.history.EmployeeHistoryView]EmplHistoryAppModule.EmployeeHistoryView_0_findByKey_
[359] Binding param "SysEffectiveDateBindVar": 2010-10-01
[360] // ERROR: Unknown data type oracle.jbo.domain.Date // JBO-JDBC-INTERACT
[361] pStmt.setObjectAtName(SysEffectiveDateBindVar, "2010-10-01"); // JBO-JDBC-INTERACT
[362] Binding param "fbkKy__0": 3
[363] // ERROR: Unknown data type oracle.jbo.domain.Number // JBO-JDBC-INTERACT
[364] pStmt.setObjectAtName(fbkKy__0, "3"); // JBO-JDBC-INTERACT
Environment successfully binds today date to :SysEffectiveDateBindVar.
But if I try to invoke updateEmployeeHistoryView1 method environment binds already the variable that doesn't presents in SQL query, so I have an exception:
[606] EmployeeHistoryView_1_findByKey_ ViewRowSetImpl.doSetWhereClause(-1, SysEffectiveDateBindVar, 2010-10-01)
[607] EmployeeHistoryView_1_findByKey_ ViewRowSetImpl.doSetWhereClause(-1, Bind_SysEffectiveDate, 2010-10-01 00:00:00.0)
[608] EmployeeHistoryView_1_findByKey_ ViewRowSetImpl.doSetWhereClause(-1, fbkKy__0, 3)
[609] executeQueryForCollection ViewObject:EmployeeHistoryView_1_findByKey_, RowSet:EmployeeHistoryView_1_findByKey_
[610] ViewObject: [com.test.sdo.dateeffective.employee.history.EmployeeHistoryView]EmplHistoryAppModule.EmployeeHistoryView_1_findByKey_ close prepared statements...
[611] ViewObject: [com.test.sdo.dateeffective.employee.history.EmployeeHistoryView]EmplHistoryAppModule.EmployeeHistoryView_1_findByKey_ Created new QUERY statement
[612] EmployeeHistoryView_1_findByKey_>#q computed SQLStmtBufLen: 403, actual=380, storing=410
[613] SELECT EmployeeHistory.HISTORY_ID,         EmployeeHistory.POSITION,         EmployeeHistory.WAGE,         EmployeeHistory.EMPL_ID,         EmployeeHistory.START_DATE,         EmployeeHistory.END_DATE FROM EMPLOYEE_HISTORY EmployeeHistory WHERE (EmployeeHistory.HISTORY_ID = :fbkKy__0) AND (:SysEffectiveDateBindVar BETWEEN EmployeeHistory.START_DATE AND EmployeeHistory.END_DATE)
[614] pStmt = conn.prepareStatement("SELECT EmployeeHistory.HISTORY_ID, EmployeeHistory.POSITION, EmployeeHistory.WAGE, EmployeeHistory.EMPL_ID, EmployeeHistory.START_DATE, EmployeeHistory.END_DATE FROM EMPLOYEE_HISTORY EmployeeHistory WHERE (EmployeeHistory.HISTORY_ID = :fbkKy__0) AND (:SysEffectiveDateBindVar BETWEEN EmployeeHistory.START_DATE AND EmployeeHistory.END_DATE)"); // JBO-JDBC-INTERACT
[615] Bind params for ViewObject: [com.test.sdo.dateeffective.employee.history.EmployeeHistoryView]EmplHistoryAppModule.EmployeeHistoryView_1_findByKey_
[616] Binding param "SysEffectiveDateBindVar": 2010-10-01
[617] // ERROR: Unknown data type oracle.jbo.domain.Date // JBO-JDBC-INTERACT
[618] pStmt.setObjectAtName(SysEffectiveDateBindVar, "2010-10-01"); // JBO-JDBC-INTERACT
[619] Binding param "Bind_SysEffectiveDate": 2010-10-01 00:00:00.0
[620] // ERROR: Unknown data type java.sql.Timestamp // JBO-JDBC-INTERACT
[621] pStmt.setObjectAtName(Bind_SysEffectiveDate, "2010-10-01 00:00:00.0"); // JBO-JDBC-INTERACT
[622] ViewObject: [com.test.sdo.dateeffective.employee.history.EmployeeHistoryView]EmplHistoryAppModule.EmployeeHistoryView_1_findByKey_ close single-use prepared statements
[623] pStmt.close(); // JBO-JDBC-INTERACT
[624] QueryCollection.executeQuery failed...
[625] java.sql.SQLException: Attempt to set a parameter name that does not occur in the SQL: Bind_SysEffectiveDate
     at oracle.jdbc.driver.SQLStateMapping.newSQLException(SQLStateMapping.java:70)
     at oracle.jdbc.driver.DatabaseError.newSQLException(DatabaseError.java:133)
     at oracle.jdbc.driver.DatabaseError.throwSqlException(DatabaseError.java:199)
     at oracle.jdbc.driver.DatabaseError.throwSqlException(DatabaseError.java:263)
     at oracle.jdbc.driver.DatabaseError.throwSqlException(DatabaseError.java:271)
     at oracle.jdbc.driver.OraclePreparedStatement.setObjectAtName(OraclePreparedStatement.java:11178)
     at oracle.jdbc.driver.OraclePreparedStatementWrapper.setObjectAtName(OraclePreparedStatementWrapper.java:815)
     at weblogic.jdbc.wrapper.PreparedStatement_oracle_jdbc_driver_OraclePreparedStatementWrapper.setObjectAtName(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.jbo.server.OracleSQLBuilderImpl.bindParamValue(OracleSQLBuilderImpl.java:4655)
     at oracle.jbo.server.BaseSQLBuilderImpl.bindParametersForStmt(BaseSQLBuilderImpl.java:3645)
     at oracle.jbo.server.ViewObjectImpl.bindParametersForCollection(ViewObjectImpl.java:19288)
In Fusion Developer's Guide for Oracle Application Development Framework 11g Release 1 (11.1.1) at chapter 5.2 says that environmnet uses :Bind_SysEffectiveDate bind variable for passing effective date for Date Effective Business Components. But I see that in my case :SysEffectiveDateBindVar bind variabe is used for get method and both variables are used in update method.
Why environment trying to bind :Bind_SysEffectiveDate if only :SysEffectiveDateBindVar is present in the query ? How can I solve this problem ?
I'm using
Oracle JDeveloper Studio Edition Version 11.1.1.3.0
WebLogic Server Version: 10.3.3.0
Oracle SOA Suite 11.1.1.
Edited by: user2975420 on 01.10.2010 6:26

As I understood ApplicationModule.EFF_DT_PROPERTY_STR is used to pass the value of SysEffectiveDate. This means that this value will bind to variable that present in query filter (:Bind_SysEffectiveDate).
If this property is not set, the current date value binds to :Bind_SysEffectiveDate variable.
But the reason of my problem is another.
When I create date effective entity and date effective view object for this entity the query of VO is next (I see this query in query editor in JDeveloper):
SELECT EmployeeHistory.HISTORY_ID,
EmployeeHistory.POSITION,
EmployeeHistory.WAGE,
EmployeeHistory.EMPL_ID,
EmployeeHistory.START_DATE,
EmployeeHistory.END_DATE
FROM EMPLOYEE_HISTORY EmployeeHistory
WHERE (:Bind_SysEffectiveDate BETWEEN EmployeeHistory.START_DATE AND EmployeeHistory.END_DATE)
But when I invoke getEmployeeHistoryView1 method of view object service interface, the query which I see in log is next:
SELECT EmployeeHistory.HISTORY_ID,
EmployeeHistory.POSITION,
EmployeeHistory.WAGE,
EmployeeHistory.EMPL_ID,
EmployeeHistory.START_DATE,
EmployeeHistory.END_DATE
FROM EMPLOYEE_HISTORY EmployeeHistory
WHERE (EmployeeHistory.HISTORY_ID = :fbkKy__0)
AND (:SysEffectiveDateBindVar BETWEEN EmployeeHistory.START_DATE AND EmployeeHistory.END_DATE)
Bind variable for SysEffectiveDate has *:SysEffectiveDateBindVar* name now instead of *:Bind_SysEffectiveDate*. But method invokes successfully.
When I invoke updateEmployeeHistoryView1 environmet already tryes to bind *:Bind_SysEffectiveDate* variable that doesn't present in query. So I have exception:
java.sql.SQLException: Attempt to set a parameter name that does not occur in the SQL: Bind_SysEffectiveDate
I'm not understanding why environment binds :Bind_SysEffectiveDate parameter which doesn't present in query.

Running STAR program in Date Effective mode

Hi All,
How the date effective mode of Synchronize Territory Assignment rule concurrent will work? Will it sync all the active territories in that date range? For example if I run the STAR program from 01-Mar-2010 to 31-Mar-2010, will it sync all the territories which are all active in this date range? Will it pick up the territory which has start date as 01-Feb-2010 and end date as 30-Apr-2010?
Please advice..
Thanks,
Suresh.

The only emulator for running Classic apps I know of is SheepShaver, and from what I've read (though not confirmed) it doesn't work under Snow Leopard (not surprising; SheepShaver hasn't been update in over three years, from what I can see). It also requires the ROM image from an older Mac, and if someone had access to an older Mac to get the image, they could just run the app on that older Mac.
So I think that the ability to run Classic apps is now completely dead as of Snow Leopard.

Oracle Table for 'Date Effectivity To' field in Bill Of Materials Screen

Hi Apps Gurus,
In Oracle EBS Bill Of Materials Screen under the tab Date Effectivity, there is column: 'To' which indicates the end date upto which the BOM is active.
I want to know the base table in which this Date Effectivity To field is located in , i tried help--> diagonostics but this particular field is not present in the view given.
Almost all fields at BOM component level are present in bom_inventory_components table except this effective date to field.
Please advice as to in which table is this field present.
Thanks,
RG

Hi RG,
These both fields EFFECTIVITY_DATE & DISABLE_DATE are available in base table : BOM_COMPONENTS_B
SELECT EFFECTIVITY_DATE, DISABLE_DATE FROM BOM_COMPONENTS_B WHERE BILL_SEQUENCE_ID = :p_bill_seq_id
HTH
Sanjay

How do i find out the tables (data)effected in a schema after a particular time stamp

how do i find out the tables (data not structure)effected in a schema after a particular time stamp?
pls email in [email protected]

You can't do that. That would be a real security risc.
/KAj

GL Trial Balance Report Query with date Effectivity

We have a requirement to show the GL Trial Balance report with Effective dates as Parameters.
Current Analysis:
The Journals get updated with corresponding CCID in GL_BALANCES table when the Journal is posted. GL_BALANCE is SOB specific, if the SOB has month as period then the balances in GL_BALANCES would get updated against the month(period).
To overcome the period problem, we explored the option of using a View based on GL_JE_HEADERS and GL_JE_LINES for 'Posted' Journal Batches of a SOB. We are checking whether the GL_JE_HEADERS.default_effective_date lies between the :p_from_date and :p_to_date which is sent to the Report as a parameter. The above idea does not return expected data when the custom Trial Balance Report is run.
Following is the Query we have written for it:
SELECT cc.segment4 ACCOUNT, bal.code_combination_id,
bal.begin_balance_dr
+ SUM (NVL (gljel.accounted_dr, 0)) opening_bal_dr,
bal.begin_balance_cr
+ SUM (NVL (gljel.accounted_cr, 0)) opening_bal_cr,
ffv.description,
(SELECT SUM (NVL (gljel.accounted_dr, 0))
FROM gl_je_headers gljeh,
gl_je_lines gljel,
gl_code_combinations gcc
WHERE gljeh.default_effective_date BETWEEN :p_from_date
AND :p_to_date
AND gljeh.je_header_id = gljel.je_header_id
AND gljel.code_combination_id = gcc.code_combination_id
AND gljel.period_name = gljeh.period_name
AND gljel.set_of_books_id = :p_set_of_books_id
AND gljeh.status = 'P'
AND gljel.status = 'P'
AND gljeh.actual_flag = 'A'
--AND gljel.code_combination_id =
-- bal.code_combination_id
AND gcc.segment4 = cc.segment4
GROUP BY gcc.segment4) c_dr,
(SELECT SUM (NVL (gljel.accounted_cr, 0))
FROM gl_je_headers gljeh,
gl_je_lines gljel,
gl_code_combinations gcc
WHERE gljeh.default_effective_date BETWEEN :p_from_date
AND :p_to_date
AND gljeh.je_header_id = gljel.je_header_id
AND gljel.period_name = gljeh.period_name
AND gljel.code_combination_id = gcc.code_combination_id
AND gljel.set_of_books_id = :p_set_of_books_id
AND gljeh.status = 'P'
AND gljel.status = 'P'
AND gljeh.actual_flag = 'A'
AND gcc.segment4 = cc.segment4
GROUP BY gcc.segment4) c_cr
FROM gl_period_statuses per,
gl_code_combinations cc,
gl_balances bal,
gl_je_headers gljeh,
gl_je_lines gljel,
fnd_flex_values_vl ffv,
fnd_flex_value_sets ffvs
WHERE cc.chart_of_accounts_id = :p_chart_of_accts_id
AND bal.currency_code = :p_currency
AND bal.actual_flag = 'A'
AND bal.period_name = per.period_name
AND cc.template_id IS NULL
AND cc.code_combination_id = bal.code_combination_id
AND per.set_of_books_id = :p_set_of_books_id
AND per.application_id = 101
AND :p_from_date BETWEEN per.start_date AND per.end_date
AND gljeh.period_name = per.period_name
AND gljeh.default_effective_date <= :p_from_date
AND gljeh.je_header_id = gljel.je_header_id
AND gljel.period_name = gljeh.period_name
AND gljel.set_of_books_id = :p_set_of_books_id
AND ffv.flex_value_set_id = ffvs.flex_value_set_id
AND ffvs.flex_value_set_name = 'JSWEL_ACCOUNT'
AND gljeh.status = 'P'
AND gljel.status = 'P'
AND cc.summary_flag = ffv.summary_flag
AND cc.segment4 = ffv.flex_value
AND gljeh.actual_flag = 'A'
AND gljel.code_combination_id = bal.code_combination_id
GROUP BY bal.begin_balance_dr,
bal.begin_balance_cr,
cc.segment4,
ffv.description,
bal.code_combination_id
The problem is that not all expected columns are being queried. Kindly advise as appropriate.
Note: I have also posted this thread on the Financials forum. Posting here to present the query to a larger audience with the expectation that my query would be answered.
Thanks & Regards
Sumit

suggest to create customize TB report.

Pricing Date effect in invoice

Hai everybody,.
What is the effect of Pricing Date field in invoice.?
I know that it generally take the date as billing date.
But my requirement is, Pricing Date at invoice should be same as Pricing date at Sales Order,
How can i do this. and what all the effect of changes.
please tell me. thanks in advance.
Varma.

Hi,
Date for pricing and exchange rate
The date that determines date-related pricing elements, such as conditions and foreign exchange rate.
Use
You can use the pricing date as one of the selection criteria when you process billing documents collectively.
Procedure
The system proposes the current date. You can change it manually in the document. If you change the pricing date, the system recalculates pricing for the entire document. If the date is in the past, you receive a warning before you can continue.
Determining the Proposal
In the order: You can customize the order type to determine a proposal, such as the current date or the requested delivery date as the pricing date.
In the billing document: The billing date is proposed as the pricing date.

'Latest Start Date' & 'Effective Start Date' are displayed as different

Issue Background:
I have told following steps to follow while creating an employee to my end users.
Case: An employee record has to be entered on 02-05-2012 who joined on 01-01-2010.
Steps to be followed:
- Enter the basic details of the employee (on 'People' form) / Left the 'Effective Start Date' and 'Latest Start Date' as default date i.e. 02-05-2012
- Ctrl + S
- Click on 'Assignment' button
- Enter Basic Assignment information (The effective date on Assignment form is being displayed as '02-05-2012')
- Ctrl + S / Close the assignment form
- Change the 'Latest Start Date' = 01-01-2010
- Ctrl + S / Some warnings appear and then the record is saved.
My end user created at least 100 employees following the same procedure.
Issue:
With at least 5 employees there is a case that when I query those employees I am able to see a different Effective Start Date (i.e. 01-01-2010) and Latest Start Date (i.e. 02-05-2012). And when I open the assignment form the effective date displayed there is '02-05-2012' as well. ....Means some how in these records the assignment is created for these employees starting from 02-05-2012..rather than 01-01-2010.
When I try to change the Latest Start Date to 01-01-2010 then system shows me this error --> '_APP-PAY-06841: Person changes exist between the old date and new date._'
I don't know EITHER how this case was produced while entering the date OR what is the solution of this problem.
Can any body help in this regard?

Thanks for your response Avinash.
Btw, I have viewed all these notes 368289.1, 603233.1, 399056.1, 329692.1, 1146414.1 already, but these don't seem to solve my problem because in each of these are under assumption that the initial Joining Date of the employee (i.e. Effective Start Date and Latest Start Date) is entered correctly without an issue, and these notes talk about dealing with 'Updating or Correcting' the data.
But In my case the pre-conditions are different, although those are making the system to respond in the same way (i.e. showing same error) some how.
As far as deleting the employees is concerned, yes that could be one option, but I am not really sure about adapting this solution as the dates I used in my case were just example dates, and in actual these employees are created almost 1 month back and they are already used in Projects module, CRM module and others.

Valid from date in ECM and BOM.

Hi All,
I create a Change master with release key and assign a material as an object whose BOM will be changed. I save the Change number.
I go to change BOM main screen of the same material and enter the change number created, by default the valid from date comes as todays date. But when i hit enter to go inside the change BOM screen then the date dissapears from the field and i get an error as "please enter valid from date" even if the date of ECN is valid and that of BOM is also valid.
Can somebody help in this?
Thanks
Shailesh.

Shailesh,
While creating the BOM have you used the change number ...? if yes then display that change number and check wheather do you have any alternative date mention in it.
check validity date of change number as well as BOM validity.
another reason can be you need to apply SAP note 1278790.
https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=0001231930
check it out and revert back for further discussion.
Hope it helps you.
Regards
Ritesh

How do I replace someone elses IPAD data with MY ipad data (effectively borrowing someone else's for a work trip)

Borrowing a co-workers ipad for a biz trip. (Mine was just stolen!) Need to wipe his data and re-synch with mine. How do I do that?

Tap on his id in Settings > Store to log out of it, then remove his content via Settings > General > Reset > Erase All Content And Settings, you can then log in with your account via Settings > Store and sync your content from your computer.
Has he copied his purchases off via File > Transfer Purchases when connected to his computer's iTunes and made a backup of his content so that he can copy it back on when you give it back to him ?

Enter a valid date error for ECM

Dear Sir
in our scenario any changes to be done in material bom ecm to be created,but when i m trying to do chnages with that no. it gives enter a valid date error.
regards
kunal

Dear
When ever any changes done in BOM , it can be captured in the same ECM number generated during the creation of bom under a valid date either u have entered or it will take current date as default date .
Now , if you forget that date , you should goto CC03-Engineering number and then check date from which it is valid .In CS02 , you should give that date along the same ECM number .Generally , it automatically pop up or else if it takes the current date during CS02 txn , u need to change the valid from date of ECM number
hope it is clear
Regards
JH

How to correct employee hire,Effective dt from People and Asg date as well

Dear
I have some problem while termination of employee,at the time of migration some of cases date was not corrected,so my client has rectified of tht cases & now i need to correct hired date,effective date from per_all_peopel_f & as well as to change assignemnt effective date,
can you please guide me ,is it possiable and which api need to use.
Thanks

if your purpose is to change the start date (hire date) of an employee, the API you are looking for is 'HR_CHANGE_START_DATE_API' .
Just go through the procedures in this API and you can easily figure out how to call it to change the hire date of an existing employee.
Please note that changing the hire date in per_all_people_f change all child dates (ie assignment start dates etc).
Let us know how did it work out.

BOM Validation date

Hi All,
In BOM creation, the validity of all the component are from current date to the max. of 31.12.9999 but I want to have
1. Specific Duration for Compenent of a BOM and
2. Specific Duration for that BOM
Can it be possible?
Sekhar

Dear Mr.Sekhar,
1.As far I know I dont think we can fix the Valid to Date for a BOM.
2.Even Using ECM you can not fix the Valid To Date for a BOM.
3.Using with or without ECM you can change the Valid From date of a BOM while
creation itself .
4.If you do so then the BOM will be valid only from the date which you entered
while creation.
5.ECM is used only to track the Changes that happened for BOM items along
with the date effectivity.BOM history can be obtained.
If useful reward points.
Regards
Mangal

ECM/OCM PROBLEM

HI FRIENDS,
IN TRANSACTION CC01 WHEN WE GO TO OBJECT TYPE USING 'WITH RELEASE KEY', WE FIND CHECK BOXES IN FRONT OF BOM, ROUTING, REFERENCE OPERATION SET ETC.
NOW MY QUESTION IS WHY THERE R NO CHECK BOXES IN FRONT OF MATERIAL. DOES IT MEAN WE CAN NOT CHANGE MATERIAL WITH RELEASE KEY. IF NO.......... WHY?????? PLEASE EXPLAIN....
AGAIN WHEN WE GO TO CR02 THERE IS NO FACILITY OF ENTERING CHANGE NO. ALSO WORK CENTER IS NOT THERE IN OBJECT TYPE LIST IN ECM. DOES IT MEAN WE CAN NOT CHANGE W/C WITH CHANGE NO????????WHY????????????

In CC01,
Wherever you donot have the check box, it is ment to be active.
For the materiail we have a different feature called change -->schedule, i.e. means with out chnage master also we can effect the chnage in the future?
Is it available for BOM?
Material number is general, even when you donot impliment ECM should be in the position to get the desaired data.
When we have BOm/Routing i.e.means we have full data for ECM.
In case of materail the advantage is we can get all data except that if you activate ECM, you can restict the chnage by release key.
In os27, even when you switch off ECM for BOM, in CS01 you cannot see change number field, but in MM01 it is available?
Hence for some objects it is alredy active.
your second questionn is Work centre
In case of work centre, changes are captured in a different way in IMG.
In OP40- change doc activation is there.
Chan ges which will affect the dependent object is the work center caoacity which are controlled by dates....hence may be the case.
This is purely my anlysis.

New business requirement for ECM changes to BOM item detail

Hello SAP ECM gurus,
I need your guidance on below requirement from the customer in ECM.
We have 'Date effectivity' in our system i.e. object changes become effective on 'valid from' date.
We also have a custom enhancement where BOM header status is controlled by the 'post approval' process via workflow.
i.e. BOM status is changed to 11 when 'Complete Change' status is set on OMR and changed back to '01' automatically when 'Release Change' is set on OMR.
We have a new requirement from business as described below:
For ex:
2 components (COMP1 & COMP2) are added to BOM through ECR1 effective from 01-AUG-2011 till Infinity
2 more components (COMP3 & COMP4) will be added to the same alternate through ECR2 effective from 01-SEP-2011 till Infinity.
ECR1 changes are made and OMR status set to 'Complete Changes' changes i.e. BOM status is 11 effective from 01AUG2011 till Infinity.
At this point of time, ECR2 is created. When changes are being made to the same BOM using ECR2, COMP1 & COMP2 (added through ECR1) appear in the BOM.
This is not desirable for the customer. They do not want to see COMP1 & COMP2 to appear when changes are being made to ECR2 as ECR1 is still not post approved. They expect COMP1 & COMP2 to appear in the BOM only when ECR1 is post approved.
How can we control effectivity of COMP1 & COMP2 such that, they become available in the system ONLY WHEN 'Release Change' is set on OMR?
Can 'Parameter Effectivity' be used in this scenario?
Thank you very much for your advice and guidance,
BK

Hi JH thanks for your quick reply,
Let me describe it more specific, I have two material FG and SFG. Material FG is maintained with valuation type so when we do goods receipt for SFG it's asked to input valuation type in batch field. In stock SFG material qty is separated for each valuation type like batch.
Now i want to maintain in BOM for FG, where component SFG has fix the valuation type / batch so that in production order we don't have to choose manually. Do you have any idea ?
Regards,
Arman

Date effectivity - ECM

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for