Date Stamp Issues - Calculate Read only

I want to use a date stamp with the current date that a form was printed.  I was able to get this to work on one form I created from a Word Doc., so that the field only shows when printing and auto calcs the current date.  I however can not replicate it on others that were also from a Word Doc.  When I copy the field from the working form to another form, the field is not visible when printing.  I added the field to my library and pulled it from there to the new form and it does not work there either.  I have pulled this from my librabry to a new blank form and it works there.  
I am assuming there is something in the form that I can't see that is hiding this field when I print it?  Some kind of background feature or something brought over from th Word Doc. maybe?  Though the form that does work was created the same way so I am not sure why the others would have issues.
Little frustrating!
Thank you!

I want to use a date stamp with the current date that a form was printed.  I was able to get this to work on one form I created from a Word Doc., so that the field only shows when printing and auto calcs the current date.  I however can not replicate it on others that were also from a Word Doc.  When I copy the field from the working form to another form, the field is not visible when printing.  I added the field to my library and pulled it from there to the new form and it does not work there either.  I have pulled this from my librabry to a new blank form and it works there.  
I am assuming there is something in the form that I can't see that is hiding this field when I print it?  Some kind of background feature or something brought over from th Word Doc. maybe?  Though the form that does work was created the same way so I am not sure why the others would have issues.
Little frustrating!
Thank you!

Similar Messages

  • Why my Data form is  still read only

    Hi All,
    I have created a planning application with the following dimensions
    Accounts, Entity, Scenario, Year total, version and currency.
    In entity dimension I have the following members
    Entity
    UK(level 0)
    US
    North Carolina
    Charlotte (level 0)
    Australia (level 0)
    In version dimesion I have two members draft1 as standard bottom up and draft2 as standard target.
    Data Form's Layout*
    PAGE : DESCENDENTS (SCENARIO), DESCENDENTS (ENTITY),DESCENDENTS (SCENARIO), (DRAFT1,DRAFT2)
    ROWS : DESCENDENTS (ACCOUNTS)
    COLUMNS : IDESCENDENTS (YEAR TOTAL), ISIBLINGS (FY12)
    After creating the data form, I tried to enter data in the Charlotte (level 0) but it is in read only form even though I select the version as draft 1 ( standard bottom up) . How can I overcome this issue.
    Kindly guide me.
    Thanks and Regards
    ChiDam
    Edited by: ChiDam on Jan 19, 2012 9:33 AM

    Hi KP,
    Thanks for your reply. The year total and period dimensions are set as columns in data form layout. We know that we won't select the member of the dimensions which are mentioned in columns but we select the member of the dimensions which are mentioned in pages. Also we checked which you have mentioned in the previous post. Is there any other possibilities to overcome this issue.
    Thanks and Regards
    ChiDam
    Edited by: ChiDam on Jan 19, 2012 12:51 PM

  • Refresh issue in read only VOs

    Hi,
    We have a create/edit page where user creates a particular entity say A. There is another search page where one of the search criteria is the entity A. This search criteria is shown as a dropdown in this page. The problem is, once the entity is created, it does not immediately gets reflected in other page search criteria drop down. There is a inconsistent lag in time after which the entity appears. Some times its 30 minutes to 1 Hrs. Kind of it looks like a cache issue of a read only VO which probably might get pushed out of cache after a lag and comes back, but we are not sure if there is any parameter to control this default behavior. Also this behavior was observed only in System testing environment. This behavior was not observed in any of our development instances. We are in release 12.1.3. Any pointers would be helpful.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Balaji

    From the documentation
    >
    When a view object has one or more underlying entity usages, you can create new rows, and modify or remove queried rows. The entity-based view object coordinates with underlying entity objects to enforce business rules and to permanently save the changes to the database. In addition, entity-based view objects provide these capabilities that do not exist with read-only view objects:
    Changes in cache (updates, inserts, deletes) managed by entities survive the view object's execution boundary.
    Changes made to relevant entity object attributes through other view objects in the same transaction are immediately reflected.
    >
    Read more at
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E17904_01/web.1111/b31974/bcquerying.htm#ADFFD239
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E17904_01/web.1111/b31974/bcadvvo.htm#ADFFD1197

  • How to make data of responsabilitys in read only for users

    hi everyone
    i need help to find a way to make all datas in the E-Business suite application in read only. i try to attach the diffirents responsabilitys with options profiles but i cant make this process work
    if anyone please know any way to help to make this work it will be mush appreciated.
    Thanks in advence
    My said ABAROUN

    So you'd better ask this in the E-business forum.
    Sybrand Bakker
    Senior Oracle DBA

  • Data warehouse backups and read only tablespaces

    Hi all,
    I am working on a data warehouse database with following specs:
    Version: Oracle 10.2.0.3 Enterprise
    OS: Solaris
    App: Data warehouse
    We use RMAN to take 'level 0' & 'level 1' backups. We have block change tracking enabled and RMAN backups up data files and archive logs straight to tape.
    I am exploring ways of reducing the 'level 0' backups and was specifically focussing on using read-only tablespaces for this purpose.
    I have often seen it mentioned that a best practice in D/Ws is to store the old static partitions of fact tables in read only tablespaces so as to reduce the backup size.
    In case you have already implemented such a scheme, I would like to know how you have implemented it.
    I am thinking of the following mechanism:
    -- Start using backups at tablespace level rather than 'level 0' at database level.
    -- Record the latest SCNs of all datafiles prior to back up.
    -- If the latest SCN has not changed since last backup and the tablespace is in read only mode then
    -- Check if a backup copy of the tablespace has been done within the recovery window and is accessible.
    -- If the copy exists then don't backup that tablespace, else backup the tablespace.
    -- If the tablespace is read/write then back it up.
    I haven't delved into the low level details, but this seems to be lot of work. So just wanted to know from you if there's any ready made feature which makes all this easier.
    Many thanks in advance.

    Thank you so much for your help.
    Backup optimization was indeed the thing I was looking for. To be honest I had done a bit of RTFM, but I didn't check the advanced user guide.
    Although my specific question has been answered, it would be interesting to know what other things other people are implementing to reduce backups etc.
    I am also thinking of following options:
    -- Turn on index monitoring to get rid of unused indexes.
    -- Stop the backups of 'index' tablespaces.
    -- Archive off old data.
    Any other ideas for reducing DW backup size?
    Many thanks.

  • DBMS - Data not visible to read only account users.

    I have created below view to know the status of my batch jobs which run on server every sunday.
    CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW CAFDB_REFRESH AS
    SELECT
    log_id,
    owner,
    to_char(log_date, 'DD-MON-YY HH24:MI:SS') TIMESTAMP,
    job_name,
    status,
    ERROR#,
    run_duration,
    instance_id,
    additional_info
    FROM user_scheduler_job_run_details;
    it is working fine and i am able to get the information.
    now to make it visible to read only account users - using "grant select " i have given access and also created public synonym.
    but it is showing only column names in read only account not the data.
    how to make this visible to read only account?
    please guide.

    USER_ views will only have the objects owned by the user running the query..In your case it will have only the schedules done by the user.
    You will have to ue ALL_ or DBA view (all_scheduler_job_run_details)

  • Character issues in read-only JTextArea

    hi
    i am using a JTextArea for displaying multi-line text. the component
    has been set to read only and background color adjusted so it appears
    more like a label. i am adding this component to container with
    gridbaglayout and it has been given HORIZONTAL fill and weightx as 1.0
    so space is not a constraint for the component as a whole.
    the issue is i find some part of first character being chopped off.
    for instance if the first character is 'W' then its slightly chopped
    at the top-left corner. however for characters like 'T' it doesnt show
    any issues (since width of 'T' is smaller than 'W').
    however the problem is only with the first character, that also which
    are relatively wider in size.
    has anybody experienced this behavior before and how to resolve it.
    thanks.
    regards,
    amey

    I don't know why this is happening to you, but you could always try to change the margins of your JTextArea to allow a small buffer between the border of the JTextArea and the text that it contains. This can be adjusted using the setMargin(Insets m) method.
    If this doesn't help, you may wish to post a small SSCCE - a small compilable program that demonstrates your problem. For more info on SSCCEs please look here:
    [http://homepage1.nifty.com/algafield/sscce.html|http://homepage1.nifty.com/algafield/sscce.html]
    Good luck.

  • LR/Mogrify Date stamping issue

    I have been using LR Mogrify to date stamp upon export for months now with great success.  Unfortunately after a system failure I need to reinstall all of my programs.  I have re-installed LR3, Image Magick and LR Mogrify 2.  And now upon export, all I see is a faint attempt at a date stamp, and sometimes even two faint attemps on the same picture.  See attached.  Also, I am illustrating my setting.  Any thoughts why this may be ocurring?  Thanks!

    Your problem is that you are using a version of LabVIEW (7.4) that does not exist!
    It's hard to say what the problem is without seeing your code. If you are using DAQmx to read the thermocouples, then there is a timestamp that is part of the dynamic or waveform data type that is returned. Assuming that you are using the Write to Measurement File, you should have no problems. Post what you have written.

  • Multi Data Source, Fail Over, Read-Only detected as unavailable

    We are using WLS 10.3.6.0 with WebCenter Content (WCC) as the application.
    For the production back end, RAC will be be the production DB and we need to support failover to Data Guard.
    We set up a Multi Data Source (MDS) with the first simple Data Source pointing to RAC and the second Data Source pointing to Data Guard.
    Upon testing, this scenario basically works correctly: when RAC is shutdown and Data Guard enabled, the switch occurs and the app works against Data Guard. And conversely, when Data Guard is shut down and RAC brought up, MDS will revert to pointing to RAC and the app will work correctly.
    However the DBA insists, that the alternate Data Source should not need to be completely down but should be able to be in a read-only state and the MDS should detect that if it is in a read-only state, it will be counted as unavailable and try to use the alternate Data Source. This does not work with the default set up, I see in the logs that a connection can be made to the read-only DB instance which will not work at all with the app and is not what is desired by the customer.
    Is there a way to configure the MDS so that if a Data SOurce is only available as read-only, the alternate Data Source will be used?

    I may be able to describe a trick... Try setting the "test table" property of the DataGuard DataSource
    to some update statement, ideally one to a otherwise unused table. eg:
    SQL update myJunkTable set foo = 1 where 1 = 0
    This won't actually update the table (which could have zero rows even) but I hope the
    read-only DBMS would throw an exception anyway, and this will give WLS the impression
    it can't get healthy connections, and That DataSource won't be used, until the read-only
    status is removed.
    However, from a standard point of view, a read-only DBMS may be perfectly useful for some applications,
    so that is not of itself a reason for WLS not to use it.

  • BI 7.0 data load issue: InfoPackage can only load data to PSA?

    BI 7.0 backend extraction gurus,
    We created a generic datasource on R3 and replicated it to our BI system, created an InfoSource, the Transformation from the datasource to the InfoSource, an ODS, the transformation from the InfoSource to the ODS. 
    After the transformation creation between the InfoSource and the ODS is done on this BI system, a new folder called "Data Transfer Process" is also created under this ODS in the InfoProvider view.  In the Data Transfer Process, in the Extraction tab, picks 'Full' in the field Extraction Mode, in the Execute tab, there is a button 'Execute', click this button (note: so far we have not created InfoPackage yet) which sounds like to conduct the data load, but find there is no data available even if all the status show green (we do have a couple of records in the R3 table). 
    Then we tried to create an InfoPackage, in the Processing tab, find 'Only PSA' radio button is checked and all others like 'PSA and then into Data Targets (Package by Package)" are dimmed!  In the Data Target tab, find the ODS as a target can't be selected!  Also there are some new columns in this tab, 'Maintain Old Update Rule' is marked with red color 'X', under another column 'DTP(S) are active and load to this target', there is an inactive picture icon, that's weird since we have already activated the Data Transfer Process!  Anyway, we started the data load in the InfoPackage, and the monitor shows the records are brought in, but since in the Process tab in the InfoPackage, 'Only PSA' radio button is checked with all others dimmed that there is no any data going to this ODS!  Why in BI 7.0, 'Only PSA' radio button can be checked with others all dimmed?
    Many new features with BI 7.0!  Any one's idea/experience is greatly appreciate on how to load data in BI 7.0!

    You dont have to select anything..
    Once loaded to PSA in DTP you have the option of FULL or DELTA ,full loads all the data from PSA and DELTA loads only the last load of PSA.
    Go through the links for Lucid explainations
    Infopackage -
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/43/03808225cf5167e10000000a1553f6/content.htm
    DTP
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/42/f98e07cc483255e10000000a1553f7/frameset.htm
    Creating DTP
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/42/fa50e40f501a77e10000000a422035/content.htm
    <b>Pre-requisite-</b>
    You have used transformations to define the data flow between the source and target object.
    Creating transformations-
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/f8/7913426e48db2ce10000000a1550b0/content.htm
    Hope it Helps
    Chetan
    @CP..

  • Issue with Read only VO Query bind parameters

    Hi Experts,
    Working in Jdev 11.1.1.3.0
    I am face one issue, probably its very common to all of us, bcoz i to do the same thing in N number of times.
    Issue:
    select count(*) as cnt from emp
    where
    ((:BindEmpId is NOT NULL AND EMP_ID = :BindEmpId) AND
    (DEPT_ID IS NULL OR DEPT_ID =: BindDeptId));
    when i run this query its giving correct result(count is 0) but usually i written like
    select count(*) as cnt from emp
    where
    ((:BindEmpId is NOT NULL AND EMP_ID = :BindEmpId) AND
    (BindDeptId IS NULL OR DEPT_ID =: BindDeptId));
    this time its giving count is 1, which is wrong.
    Data in data base:
    ID     DeptID     value EmpID
    226     1519     jh 601     
    So which one is correct?

    Well, the two select statements are for different use cases and we can't decide which is the correct one as we don't know the use case.
    Your data looks like
    ID   DeptID value EmpID
    226  1519   jh    601 There are some decisions we can't make with only one row in the table. We don't know if DepIt can be null in the table and/or EmpId can be null. This information is vital for your select statements.
    Next we don't know how you want to handle the query if one or both bind parameters are null.
    Should the query return 0 in this case or should the query just omit the part of the query if the bind variable is null (and then return the result found with the remaining query)?
    We can't possible answer this.
    You need to provide more information...
    Timo

  • Read only field in data manager

    Hi,
    if we set a field permission as read only in console.
    in data manager this field will be read only.
    in import manager during process of import will this field be receiving value or it will be read only
    Sonali

    Hello,
    I tested (MDM 5.5 sp6) and if you import data, and for a read-only fied mapped, data can be created and updated ( import done with same role/user than the one with read/only rules)
    I haven't see this behaviour on documentation, but don't look as a trouble for me.
    If this role/user try to update from the data manager, it is not possible to update a read-only fied
    Hope helps you
    regards
    Vincent

  • Data Type field read only in Data source for transaction data (PC_FILE)

    Hi folks,
    I need to change Data Type for some of the fields in "Field" tab in data source for transactional data. It became read only after I activate the data source. Need help in making it editable. All fields now have Data type=CHAR.
    Thanks

    Nevermind folks. I got it.

  • Customize Personal Data to be read only (EP6 SP15)

    Hi,
    Are there an easy way to make the 'Personal Data’ (Employee Self Service) read-only without changing the Webdynpros?
    I was not able to find any customisation options on the IMG to do this and would like to stay away from editing the Webdynpros if not absolutely necessary.
    Any ideas or feedback on this will be appreciated.
    SAP version: ERP 2005
    Portal: EP 6 SP 15
    Regards

    Hye there,
    Did u manage to find a solution for this?. I too would like to do the same. Hope you can find a solution for this.
    Regards,
    Elaini

  • Textarea formatting for read-only display

    Hello,
    I currently have a textarea field that is on a data entry screen, which can be displayed as editable or read-only, based on certain criteria. I noticed that when text with line breaks is entered into the textarea, it keeps these line breaks as expected when viewing the record again in edit mode. However, when the record is read-only, and the textarea is showing as read-only text, the formatting has been an issue -- all of the text is run together as if it were one continuous line. In the Label area of properties for the textarea, I added in <PRE> in the Pre Element Text value, and </PRE> for the Post Element Text, to retain formatting of the text. The good news is that now the text formats properly in edit or read-only mode; however, if a long amount of text was entered before a line break, when viewing the textarea as read-only, the text goes on and on far past the right edge of the screen so a lot of scrolling must be done to read the text.
    Is there some property or workaround I can use to restrict the width of the text showing when read-only, so the text will wrap but also maintain line breaks? I don't want to change any properties that will cause the edit view of of this textarea to function any differently. In a nutshell, I'd like to be able to have the text wrap, but still show the line breaks.
    Thanks in advance,
    Brian

    Yes, I had the same issue.
    Read only with textarea .
    It is not fixed in 3.0 version I don't know if it is in 3.0.1.
    My workaround was to use javascript to change the property of the textarea to readonly on page load event upon certain condition, something like :
    if ('&P8_EMP_TYPE.' != 'EMP' || '&P8_DATE.' != ''){
    document.getElementById('P8_EMP_COMMENTS').readOnly = true}
    You should be able to do something similar with most conditions, if you find a better workaround pls let me know.
    George

Maybe you are looking for