Dear experts. help me with this query plz.
i am generating a report in dev6i.
the following query is working properly. and also fetching the data with outer(+) join.
select i.itemcode,sum(gs.approved)-sum(iss.issuedqty)
from ims_itemcode i,ims_issues iss, ims_grns gs
where i.itemcode=gs.itemcode and gs.itemcode=iss.itemcode(+) group by i.itemcode;
but i have to join two more tables (ims_issuem,ims_grnm)
after adding these two tables the query will be
select i.itemcode,sum(gs.approved)-sum(iss.issuedqty)
from ims_itemcode i,ims_issues iss, ims_grns gs, ims_issuem im, ims_grnm gm
where i.itemcode=gs.itemcode and gs.itemcode=iss.itemcode(+) and gm.grnmserial=gs.grnsserial and
im.issuemserial=iss.issuesserial group by i.itemcode;
now the query works but doesn't fetch the results with outer(+) join. it just picks the results which are matching in both the tables but i want the results along with the outer(+) join.
what is the problem in the second query please help.
You need to add more outer join.
Try this..
select i.itemcode,sum(gs.approved)-sum(iss.issuedqty)
from ims_itemcode i,ims_issues iss, ims_grns gs, ims_issuem im, ims_grnm gm
where i.itemcode=gs.itemcode (+)
and gs.itemcode=iss.itemcode(+)
and gm.grnmserial(+)=gs.grnsserial
and im.issuemserial(+)=iss.issuesserial
group by i.itemcode;if not work, try a trick. After your first query work. add one table and check if need add outer join.
Hope this helps
Hamid
Similar Messages
-
Query Issue in Creating a View....Please help me with this query..
I would like to create a view on this table with four columns
1. PN#_EXP_DATE
2. PN#
3. PN#_EFF_DATE
4. PN#
P_S_C A_C P EXP_DT
21698 13921 1 5/29/2009 3:15:41 PM
21698 13921 1 5/29/2009 3:54:57 PM
21698 1716656 4 5/29/2009 3:15:41 PM
21698 3217 3 5/29/2009 3:15:40 PM
21698 3217 3 5/29/2009 3:54:57 PM
21698 60559 2 5/29/2009 3:15:41 PM
21698 60559 2 5/29/2009 3:54:57 PM
I have a trigger on A, which inserts the DML records into B. (Table A and B structure is the almost the same,
where table B will have one extra column exp_dt)
NOw Table B can have records with same P_S_C and A_C columns and exp_dt will capture the history.
for example: from the above sample data, let us take first two records..
P_S_C A_C P EXP_DT
21698 13921 1 5/29/2009 3:15:41 PM --- Record 1
21698 13921 1 5/29/2009 3:54:57 PM --- Record 2
from this..
Note: 1. Table A and Table C can be joined using A.P_S_C and C.R_C to get the start_date.
2. PN# comes from table D. It contains numbers for the resp. weeks.
3. PN#_EFF_DATE is the previous immediate previous date for that record in history table (Table B).
I wanted the data like..
---- this is for the second record in the above..
PN#_EXP_DATE PN# PN#_EFF_DATE PN#
5/29/2009 3:54:57 PM 214 5/29/2009 3:15:41 PM 214
---- this is for the first record in the above..
PN#_EXP_DATE PN# PN#_EFF_DATE PN#
5/29/2009 3:54:41 PM 214 ( for this we should query the table C to get the
start_date, for this combinatation of P_S_C and A_C in table B
where B.P_S_C = C.A_C
and that value should be the EFF_DT for this record)
Please help me with this....
Thanks in advance..Hi All,
select d.P# as "PN#_EXP_DATE", exp_date
from daily_prd d, cbs1_assoc_hist b
where to_char(d.day_date,'MM/DD/YYYY') = to_char(b.exp_date,'MM/DD/YYYY')
and d.period_type = 'TIMEREPORT';
This above query gives the output as follows:
pn#_exp_date exp_date
214 5/29/2009 3:15:40 PM
214 5/29/2009 3:15:41 PM
214 5/29/2009 3:15:41 PM
214 5/29/2009 3:15:41 PM
214 5/29/2009 3:54:57 PM
214 5/29/2009 3:54:57 PM
214 5/29/2009 3:54:57 PM
This below is the data from history table (Table B).
P_S_C A_C PLACE EXP_DATE
21698 3217 3 5/29/2009 3:15:40 PM
21698 13921 1 5/29/2009 3:15:41 PM
21698 1716656 4 5/29/2009 3:15:41 PM
21698 60559 2 5/29/2009 3:15:41 PM
21698 13921 1 5/29/2009 3:54:57 PM
21698 3217 3 5/29/2009 3:54:57 PM
21698 60559 2 5/29/2009 3:54:57 PM
I got the pn#_exp_date from the Table 'D', for the given exp_date from Table B.
My question is again....
CASE - 1
from the given records above, I need to look for exp_date for the given same P_S_C and A_C.
in this case we can take the example...
P_S_C A_C PLACE EXP_DATE
21698 3217 3 5/29/2009 3:15:40 PM
21698 3217 3 5/29/2009 3:54:57 PM
In this case, the
pn#_exp_date exp_date pn#_eff_date eff_date
214 5/29/2009 3:15:57 PM < PN# corresponding to the 5/29/2009 3:15:40 PM
eff_date .>
<Basically the eff_date is
nothing but the exp_date only.
we should take the immediate before one.
In this case, our eff_date is '5/29/2009 3:15:40 PM'.
but how to get this.
CASE - 2
from the above sample data, consider this
P_S_C A_C PLACE EXP_DATE
21698 1716656 4 5/29/2009 3:15:41 PM
In this case, there is only one record for the P_S_C and A_C combination.
The expected result :
pn#_exp_date exp_date pn#_eff_date eff_date
214 5/29/2009 3:15:41 PM < PN# corresponding to the 5/29/2009 3:15:40 PM
eff_date .>
<Basically the eff_date is
nothing but the exp_date only.
we should take the immediate before one.
In this case to get the eff_date, we should query the Table 'C', to get the eff_date, which is START_DT column in this table.
for this join B.P_S_C and C.R_C.
Hope I am clear now..
Thanks in advance..... -
Hi Everyone...Please help me with this query...!
Please Help me with this doubt as I am unable to understand the logic...behind this code. It's a begineer level code but I need to understand the logic so that I am able to grasp knowledge. Thank you all for being supportive. Please help me.
//Assume class Demo is inherited from class SuperDemo...in other words class Demo extends SuperDemo
//Volume is a method declared in SuperDemo which returns an integer value
//weight is an integer vairable declared in the subclass which is Demo
class Example
public static void main(String qw[])
Demo ob1=new Demo(3,5,7,9);
//Calling Constructor of Demo which takes in 4 int parameters
SuperDemo ob2=new SuperDemo();
int vol;
vol=ob1.volume();
System.out.println("Volume of ob1 is " + vol);
System.out.println("Weight of ob1 is " + ob1.weight);
System.out.println();
ob2=ob1;
}Can someone please make me understand --- how is this possible and why !
If the above statement is valid then why not this one "System.out.println(ob2.weight);"
Thanks Thanks Thanks!u see the line wherein I am referencing the objectof
a subclass to the superclass...right? then why we
can't do System.out.println(ob2.weight)?You need to distinguish two things:
- the type of the object, which determines with the
object can do
- the type of the reference to the object, which
determines what you see that you can do
Both don't necessarily have to match. When you use a
SuperDemo reference (obj2) to access a Demo instance
(obj1), for all you know, the instance behind obj2 is
of type SuperDemo. That it's in reality of type Demo
is unknown to you. And usually, you don't care -
that's what polymorphism is about.
So you have a reference obj2 of type SuperDemo.
SuperDemo objects don't have weight, so you don't see
it - even though it is there.So from ur explanation wat I understand is - Even though u reference a subclass object to a superclass, u will only be able to access the members which are declared in the superclass thru the same...right
? -
i need to get each manager name, his department name and for each year that is for 81,82,83,84 count of employee's under that manager from emp and dept tables .
thanks in advance
select distinct deptno, TO_CHAR (HIREDATE, 'YY'), count(*) from emp group by TO_CHAR(HIREDATE, 'YY'), DEPTNO ORDER BY TO_CHAR(HIREDATE, 'YY'), DEPTNO;
the above query returns me count of employees ,year and deptno
SELECT DISTINCT E2.ENAME , E1.ENAME, E1.DEPTNO, E1.MGR, E1.EMPNO, E1.SAL, D.DNAME, D.LOC FROM EMP E1, EMP E2, DEPT D WHERE E1.MGR = E2.EMPNO AND E1.DEPTNO = D.DEPTNO ORDER BY E1.DEPTNO;
this query returned me manager names and employees under them
Message was edited by:
user450660At that point you're not too far off, you have most of what you need. In general, any time you see the use of DISTINCT it's a sign that either your query or your data model isn't designed quite right.
SELECT m.ename,
d.dname,
TO_CHAR (e.hiredate, 'YY') AS hire_year,
COUNT(*) AS emp_count
FROM emp e, emp m, dept d
WHERE e.mgr = m.empno
AND m.deptno = d.deptno
GROUP BY
m.ename,
d.dname,
TO_CHAR (e.hiredate, 'YY'); -
Expert help needed with tricky query
I have a query database with a real simple schema but a tricky requirement: i need to display records with a simple select but then filter the result based on the authority/access level of the user making the query.
The source data is held in a table with just the following columns:
SRCTABLE:
subject_ID
date
data_ID
data_item
All column types are text strings and the first 3 are a composite key. There are 10s of millions of records in the table.
The access authorization is held in another table with the following columns:
ACCTABLE:
data_ID
access1
access2
accessn
The ellipsis means there are as many (boolean type) access1...n columns as there are distinct access levels to the source data.
The table contains one row for each distinct data_ID appearing in the source table. On each row the TRUE values in the access1...n columns indicate authorization to see the data item and the filter should leave that row in the result set.
The question then is how to write the query statement? It is assumed that the access id (i.e. the relevant column) is known when the query is made.
Something like
SELECT data_item FROM SRCTABLE
WHERE subject_ID="xxx" AND date = "1/1/2000";
would do it except for the need to filter each row based on the access authorization of the user.
Any help would be appreciated.Thanks everybody for responding.
APC has a good point about really protecting every single item type separately. Unfortunately this is precisely the case. The security in this case is not oriented to increasing security in a levels oriented way. Rather each kind of item is protected by a need to know type security related to that particular item. Users are classified by their need to know a combination of the item types and those combinations are not in any sense consistent (and there will be new classes over time). This way access control necessarily becomes a matrix of item types vs access classes.
Fortunately this particular database does not exist yet so i am free to solve the problem in any way that fulfills the requirement. This is just the suggested form. I am not entirely happy with it hence the question on this forum in the first place.
So, i appreciate it should you have any further suggestions for optimal solution to handle the requirements. Again, those are:
1. A query that returns the data_items for a given ID and date (this is dead simple)
2. A filter (preferably in the query) that filters out those data_items the current user (his/her access class is known) is not authorized to see.
3. The plan calls for a table listing every possible item type with a column for each access class, enumerating the items allowed for that class. Any other solution to this issue would be acceptable provided it is capable to independently validate any single item type against any access class.
I hope this makes sense. -
Please help me with this query -- i am trying with Dense rank
version 10g
i received a quote for an account. if the same quote is received under different account then i should mark the previous account received as deleted.
please help me .
/* Formatted on 2010/06/28 14:13 (Formatter Plus v4.8.8) */
WITH temp AS
(SELECT '1-11TWQL' quote_id, 'COPS' ACCOUNT, 'Ordered' status,
TO_DATE ('12/23/2009 3:37:54',
'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM'
) captured_date
FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT '1-11TWQL', 'COPS', 'RFS',
TO_DATE ('12/23/2009 3:37:50', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM')
FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT '1-11TWQL', 'COPS', 'Rejected',
TO_DATE ('12/23/2009 3:37:52', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM')
FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT '1-11TWQL', 'COPS', 'Validated',
TO_DATE ('12/23/2009 3:37:51', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM')
FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT '1-11TWQL', 'D1', 'Ordered',
TO_DATE ('12/23/2009 3:04:24', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM')
FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT '1-11TWQL', 'D1', 'RFS',
TO_DATE ('12/23/2009 3:04:23', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM')
FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT '1-11TWQL', 'D1', 'Rejected',
TO_DATE ('12/23/2009 3:04:22', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM')
FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT '1-11TWQL', 'D1', 'Validated',
TO_DATE ('12/23/2009 3:04:23', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM')
FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT '1-249A8X', 'COPS', 'RFS',
TO_DATE ('3/5/2010 12:04:24', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM')
FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT '1-249A8X', 'COPS', 'RFS',
TO_DATE ('3/16/2010 7:55:50', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM')
FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT '1-249A8X', 'COPS', 'RFS',
TO_DATE ('3/16/2010 7:55:51', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM')
FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT '1-249A8X', 'COPS', 'Rejected',
TO_DATE ('3/5/2010 12:04:24', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM')
FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT '1-249A8X', 'COPS', 'Rejected',
TO_DATE ('3/16/2010 7:55:50', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM')
FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT '1-249A8X', 'COPS', 'Rejected',
TO_DATE ('3/16/2010 7:55:51', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM')
FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT '1-249A8X', 'COPS', 'Validated',
TO_DATE ('12/23/2009 3:37:54', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM')
FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT '1-249A8X', 'COPS', 'Validated',
TO_DATE ('12/23/2009 3:37:54', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM')
FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT '1-249A8X', 'COPS', 'Validated',
TO_DATE ('12/23/2009 3:37:54', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM')
FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT '1-249A8X', 'D1', 'Ordered',
TO_DATE ('3/26/2010 12:32:27', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM')
FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT '1-249A8X', 'D1', 'Ordered',
TO_DATE ('3/26/2010 12:32:27', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM')
FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT '1-249A8X', 'D1', 'RFS',
TO_DATE ('3/26/2010 12:32:27', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM')
FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT '1-249A8X', 'D1', 'RFS',
TO_DATE ('3/26/2010 12:32:27', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM')
FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT '1-249A8X', 'D1', 'Validated',
TO_DATE ('3/26/2010 12:32:27', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM')
FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT '1-249A8X', 'D1', 'Validated',
TO_DATE ('3/26/2010 12:32:27', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM')
FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT '1-249A8Z', 'COPS', 'Validated',
TO_DATE ('3/26/2010 12:32:27', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM')
FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT '1-249A8Z', 'COPS', 'Ordered',
TO_DATE ('3/26/2010 12:32:27', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM')
FROM DUAL)
SELECT quote_id, ACCOUNT, status, captured_date,
DENSE_RANK () OVER (PARTITION BY quote_id ORDER BY quote_id,
ACCOUNT) rn
-- ,CASE DENSE_RANK () OVER (PARTITION BY quote_id ORDER BY quote_id,
-- ACCOUNT)
-- WHEN 1
-- THEN 'Y'
-- ELSE 'N'
-- END deleted_flag
FROM temp
ORDER BY quote_id, captured_date;output required
WITH temp AS
(SELECT '1-11TWQL' quote_id, 'COPS' ACCOUNT, 'Ordered' status,
TO_DATE ('12/23/2009 3:37:54',
'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM'
) captured_date, 'N' deleted_flag
FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT '1-11TWQL', 'COPS', 'RFS',
TO_DATE ('12/23/2009 3:37:50', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM'), 'N' deleted_flag
FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT '1-11TWQL', 'COPS', 'Rejected',
TO_DATE ('12/23/2009 3:37:52', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM'), 'N' deleted_flag
FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT '1-11TWQL', 'COPS', 'Validated',
TO_DATE ('12/23/2009 3:37:51', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM'), 'N' deleted_flag
FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT '1-11TWQL', 'D1', 'Ordered',
TO_DATE ('12/23/2009 3:04:24', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM'), 'Y' deleted_flag
FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT '1-11TWQL', 'D1', 'RFS',
TO_DATE ('12/23/2009 3:04:23', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM'), 'Y' deleted_flag
FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT '1-11TWQL', 'D1', 'Rejected',
TO_DATE ('12/23/2009 3:04:22', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM'), 'Y' deleted_flag
FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT '1-11TWQL', 'D1', 'Validated',
TO_DATE ('12/23/2009 3:04:23', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM'), 'Y' deleted_flag
FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT '1-249A8X', 'COPS', 'RFS',
TO_DATE ('3/5/2010 12:04:24', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM'), 'Y' deleted_flag
FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT '1-249A8X', 'COPS', 'RFS',
TO_DATE ('3/16/2010 7:55:50', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM'), 'Y' deleted_flag
FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT '1-249A8X', 'COPS', 'RFS',
TO_DATE ('3/16/2010 7:55:51', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM'), 'Y' deleted_flag
FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT '1-249A8X', 'COPS', 'Rejected',
TO_DATE ('3/5/2010 12:04:24', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM'), 'Y' deleted_flag
FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT '1-249A8X', 'COPS', 'Rejected',
TO_DATE ('3/16/2010 7:55:50', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM'), 'Y' deleted_flag
FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT '1-249A8X', 'COPS', 'Rejected',
TO_DATE ('3/16/2010 7:55:51', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM'), 'Y' deleted_flag
FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT '1-249A8X', 'COPS', 'Validated',
TO_DATE ('12/23/2009 3:37:54', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM'), 'Y' deleted_flag
FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT '1-249A8X', 'COPS', 'Validated',
TO_DATE ('12/23/2009 3:37:54', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM'), 'Y' deleted_flag
FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT '1-249A8X', 'COPS', 'Validated',
TO_DATE ('12/23/2009 3:37:54', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM'), 'Y' deleted_flag
FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT '1-249A8X', 'D1', 'Ordered',
TO_DATE ('3/26/2010 12:32:27', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM'), 'N' deleted_flag
FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT '1-249A8X', 'D1', 'Ordered',
TO_DATE ('3/26/2010 12:32:27', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM'), 'N' deleted_flag
FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT '1-249A8X', 'D1', 'RFS',
TO_DATE ('3/26/2010 12:32:27', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM'), 'N' deleted_flag
FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT '1-249A8X', 'D1', 'RFS',
TO_DATE ('3/26/2010 12:32:27', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM'), 'N' deleted_flag
FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT '1-249A8X', 'D1', 'Validated',
TO_DATE ('3/26/2010 12:32:27', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM'), 'N' deleted_flag
FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT '1-249A8X', 'D1', 'Validated',
TO_DATE ('3/26/2010 12:32:27', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM'), 'N' deleted_flag
FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT '1-249A8Z', 'COPS', 'Validated',
TO_DATE ('3/26/2010 12:32:27', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM'), 'N' deleted_flag
FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT '1-249A8Z', 'COPS', 'Ordered',
TO_DATE ('3/26/2010 12:32:27', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM'), 'N' deleted_flag
FROM DUAL)
SELECT quote_id, ACCOUNT, status, captured_date, deleted_flag
FROM temp
ORDER BY quote_id, captured_date;try to wrap your query to become an in-line view. use a case statement or decode to your derived column RN from the analytic query of DENSE RANK. either way they both will work.
SQL> WITH temp AS
2 (SELECT '1-11TWQL' quote_id, 'COPS' ACCOUNT, 'Ordered' status,
3 TO_DATE ('12/23/2009 3:37:54',
4 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM'
5 ) captured_date
6 FROM DUAL
7 UNION ALL
8 SELECT '1-11TWQL', 'COPS', 'RFS',
9 TO_DATE ('12/23/2009 3:37:50', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM')
10 FROM DUAL
11 UNION ALL
12 SELECT '1-11TWQL', 'COPS', 'Rejected',
13 TO_DATE ('12/23/2009 3:37:52', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM')
14 FROM DUAL
15 UNION ALL
16 SELECT '1-11TWQL', 'COPS', 'Validated',
17 TO_DATE ('12/23/2009 3:37:51', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM')
18 FROM DUAL
19 UNION ALL
20 SELECT '1-11TWQL', 'D1', 'Ordered',
21 TO_DATE ('12/23/2009 3:04:24', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM')
22 FROM DUAL
23 UNION ALL
24 SELECT '1-11TWQL', 'D1', 'RFS',
25 TO_DATE ('12/23/2009 3:04:23', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM')
26 FROM DUAL
27 UNION ALL
28 SELECT '1-11TWQL', 'D1', 'Rejected',
29 TO_DATE ('12/23/2009 3:04:22', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM')
30 FROM DUAL
31 UNION ALL
32 SELECT '1-11TWQL', 'D1', 'Validated',
33 TO_DATE ('12/23/2009 3:04:23', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM')
34 FROM DUAL
35 UNION ALL
36 SELECT '1-249A8X', 'COPS', 'RFS',
37 TO_DATE ('3/5/2010 12:04:24', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM')
38 FROM DUAL
39 UNION ALL
40 SELECT '1-249A8X', 'COPS', 'RFS',
41 TO_DATE ('3/16/2010 7:55:50', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM')
42 FROM DUAL
43 UNION ALL
44 SELECT '1-249A8X', 'COPS', 'RFS',
45 TO_DATE ('3/16/2010 7:55:51', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM')
46 FROM DUAL
47 UNION ALL
48 SELECT '1-249A8X', 'COPS', 'Rejected',
49 TO_DATE ('3/5/2010 12:04:24', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM')
50 FROM DUAL
51 UNION ALL
52 SELECT '1-249A8X', 'COPS', 'Rejected',
53 TO_DATE ('3/16/2010 7:55:50', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM')
54 FROM DUAL
55 UNION ALL
56 SELECT '1-249A8X', 'COPS', 'Rejected',
57 TO_DATE ('3/16/2010 7:55:51', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM')
58 FROM DUAL
59 UNION ALL
60 SELECT '1-249A8X', 'COPS', 'Validated',
61 TO_DATE ('12/23/2009 3:37:54', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM')
62 FROM DUAL
63 UNION ALL
64 SELECT '1-249A8X', 'COPS', 'Validated',
65 TO_DATE ('12/23/2009 3:37:54', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM')
66 FROM DUAL
67 UNION ALL
68 SELECT '1-249A8X', 'COPS', 'Validated',
69 TO_DATE ('12/23/2009 3:37:54', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM')
70 FROM DUAL
71 UNION ALL
72 SELECT '1-249A8X', 'D1', 'Ordered',
73 TO_DATE ('3/26/2010 12:32:27', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM')
74 FROM DUAL
75 UNION ALL
76 SELECT '1-249A8X', 'D1', 'Ordered',
77 TO_DATE ('3/26/2010 12:32:27', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM')
78 FROM DUAL
79 UNION ALL
80 SELECT '1-249A8X', 'D1', 'RFS',
81 TO_DATE ('3/26/2010 12:32:27', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM')
82 FROM DUAL
83 UNION ALL
84 SELECT '1-249A8X', 'D1', 'RFS',
85 TO_DATE ('3/26/2010 12:32:27', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM')
86 FROM DUAL
87 UNION ALL
88 SELECT '1-249A8X', 'D1', 'Validated',
89 TO_DATE ('3/26/2010 12:32:27', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM')
90 FROM DUAL
91 UNION ALL
92 SELECT '1-249A8X', 'D1', 'Validated',
93 TO_DATE ('3/26/2010 12:32:27', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM')
94 FROM DUAL
95 UNION ALL
96 SELECT '1-249A8Z', 'COPS', 'Validated',
97 TO_DATE ('3/26/2010 12:32:27', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM')
98 FROM DUAL
99 UNION ALL
100 SELECT '1-249A8Z', 'COPS', 'Ordered',
101 TO_DATE ('3/26/2010 12:32:27', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss PM')
102 FROM DUAL)
103 select vt.quote_id,
104 vt.account,
105 vt.status,
106 vt.captured_date,
107 case when vt.rn = 1 then 'N'
108 else 'Y'
109 end deleted_flag
110 from (SELECT quote_id, ACCOUNT, status, captured_date,
111 DENSE_RANK () OVER (PARTITION BY quote_id ORDER BY quote_id, ACCOUNT) rn
112 FROM temp
113 ORDER BY quote_id, captured_date) vt;
QUOTE_ID ACCOUNT STATUS CAPTURED_DATE DELETED_FLAG
1-11TWQL D1 Rejected 23-Dec-2009 3 Y
1-11TWQL D1 RFS 23-Dec-2009 3 Y
1-11TWQL D1 Validated 23-Dec-2009 3 Y
1-11TWQL D1 Ordered 23-Dec-2009 3 Y
1-11TWQL COPS RFS 23-Dec-2009 3 N
1-11TWQL COPS Validated 23-Dec-2009 3 N
1-11TWQL COPS Rejected 23-Dec-2009 3 N
1-11TWQL COPS Ordered 23-Dec-2009 3 N
1-249A8X COPS Validated 23-Dec-2009 3 N
1-249A8X COPS Validated 23-Dec-2009 3 N
1-249A8X COPS Validated 23-Dec-2009 3 N
1-249A8X COPS RFS 05-Mar-2010 1 N
1-249A8X COPS Rejected 05-Mar-2010 1 N
1-249A8X COPS RFS 16-Mar-2010 7 N
1-249A8X COPS Rejected 16-Mar-2010 7 N
1-249A8X COPS Rejected 16-Mar-2010 7 N
1-249A8X COPS RFS 16-Mar-2010 7 N
1-249A8X D1 Ordered 26-Mar-2010 1 Y
1-249A8X D1 Ordered 26-Mar-2010 1 Y
1-249A8X D1 RFS 26-Mar-2010 1 Y
1-249A8X D1 RFS 26-Mar-2010 1 Y
1-249A8X D1 Validated 26-Mar-2010 1 Y
1-249A8X D1 Validated 26-Mar-2010 1 Y
1-249A8Z COPS Validated 26-Mar-2010 1 N
1-249A8Z COPS Ordered 26-Mar-2010 1 N
25 rows selected
SQL> -
Please, help me with this query
When running the SQL query below, It retrieves some lines that have the same ID_VAGA (ex. 386) but different ID_DETALHE_STATUS. in this case I want to retrieve only the line with the higher ID_DETALHE_STATUS that would be 1047. How can I do this in this SQL query ??
This is the query:
Select VAGAS.ID_VAGA, TITULOS_VAGAS.TIT_VAGA, VAGAS.QTDE_VAGAS, DETALHE_STATUS.ID_DETALHE_STATUS, DETALHE_STATUS.DETALHE_STATUS
From VAGAS Inner Join TITULOS_VAGAS On TITULOS_VAGAS.ID_TIT_VAGA = VAGAS.TIT_VAGA Inner Join DETALHE_STATUS On VAGAS.ID_VAGA = DETALHE_STATUS.ID_VAGA
Order By VAGAS.ID_VAGA
And these are the results it's returning to me: But I want it to return only the higher ID_DETALHE_STATUS, that is 1047:
ID_VAGA QTDE_VAGAS TIPO_VAGA VALOR_SALARIO TAXA_SELECAO TAXA_CANCEL UNIDADE ATIVO ID_DETALHE_STATUS DETALHE_STATUS
386 1 Estagiario 500,00 70 0 1 1 1047 A5
386 1 Estagiario 500,00 70 0 1 1 937 A2
Thanks for reading.
Roger.Hi,
You can try this too:
SELECT * FROM (
Select VAGAS.ID_VAGA, TITULOS_VAGAS.TIT_VAGA, VAGAS.QTDE_VAGAS, DETALHE_STATUS.ID_DETALHE_STATUS, DETALHE_STATUS.DETALHE_STATUS
From VAGAS
Inner Join
TITULOS_VAGAS On TITULOS_VAGAS.ID_TIT_VAGA = VAGAS.TIT_VAGA Inner Join DETALHE_STATUS On VAGAS.ID_VAGA = DETALHE_STATUS.ID_VAGA
Order By VAGAS.ID_VAGA)
WHERE DETALHE_STATUS.ID_DETALHE_STATUS>1047;Regards,
Lakshmi. -
Who can help me with this query???
I have a table looks like:
Group_id, Individual_id, field1, field2, field3...
For individuals in this table who shares the same group id, they have exact same, filed1, 2, 3, 4 but different individual_id.
How can I comebine them so I can creat a table that looks like:
group_id, (Individual_id1, individual_id2, 3...), field1, field2, field3....
Please Help!Use the WM_CONCAT function.
http://www.psoug.org/reference/undocumented.html#uwmc -
public class ImaginaryNumber
private int a;
private int b;
public ImaginaryNumber(int num1, int num2){
a = num1;
b = num2;
firstnumber = Integer.toString(a);
secondnumber = Integer.toString(b);
String s = new String();
s = firstnumber + "+" + secondnumber"i";
}it says ';' expected, can someone tell me what's wrong, thxNO!
That is not the solution. Try flipping it around. How
can you make num1 an int (or more importantly how can
you get some int value out of num1)?hmm i'm really stumped on this one. i was thinking of doing something with toString but i'm not sure.
also, i changed my code to this:
public class ImaginaryNumber
private static int a;
private static int b;
public ImaginaryNumber(int num1, int num2){
a = num1;
b = num2;
public String toString(){
String s = new String();
s = a + "+" + b + "i";
return s;
public static ImaginaryNumber add(ImaginaryNumber num1, ImaginaryNumber num2){
a = a + num1;
b = b + num2;
public static ImaginaryNumber add(ImaginaryNumber num){
a = a + num;
public static ImaginaryNumber subtract(ImaginaryNumber num1, ImaginaryNumber num2){
a = a - num1;
b = b - num2;
public static ImaginaryNumber subtract(ImaginaryNumber num){
a = a - num;
public int getRealPart(){
return a;
public int getImaginaryPart(){
return b;
} -
Hi,
Can you’ll please help me with this query.
Here is a little bit of background:
One title can have multiple items associated with it.
Table: TITLE has the master list of titles. TITLE_ID is the primary key.
Table: ITEM has the master list of all items. ITEM_ID is the primary. This table also has the TITLE_ID which stores title for this item.
Table: ITEM_STATUS has fields ITEM_ID and STATUS_ID. This field contains statuses for items. But not all items contained in the table ITEM are in this table.
I want to find TITLE_ID’s whose all items (all ITEM_ID in table ITEM having same value for TITLE_ID) have a particular status (for example STATUS_ID = 2) in table ITEM_STATUS.
Let’s say TITLE_ID = 1 has 5 items in table ITEM_ID and only 4 items out of it in table ITEM_STATUS with STATUS_ID = 2, then this TITLE_ID should not come. OR
Let’s say TITLE_ID = 1 has 5 items in table ITEM_ID and all these 5 items are in table ITEM_STATUS but only 1 has STATUS_ID = 2, then this TITLE_ID should also not come
In the above case only if all 5 items are contained in table ITEM_STATUS have STATUS_ID = 2 then this TITLE_ID should be reported by the query.
What should be the query like for this one, I am fairly new to SQL so plz guide me.
Thank you,
RajaI haven't tested the query below. Try it and let me know for any issues:
SELECT DISTINCT t.title_id
FROM title t,
item i,
item_status its
WHERE t.title_id = i.title_id
AND i.item_id = its.item_id
AND NOT EXISTS (
SELECT 1
FROM item_status its1
WHERE its1.item_id = i.item_id
AND status_id <> 'YOUR_ITEM_STATUS'
) -
Please help me with this SQL query
I am practicing SQL queries and have come across one involving fetching data from 3 different tables.
The three tables are as below
<pre>
Country
location_id country
loc1 Spain
loc2 England
loc3 Spain
loc4 USA
loc5 Italy
loc6 USA
loc7 USA
</pre>
<pre>
User
user_id location_id
u1 loc1
u2 loc1
u3 loc2
u4 loc2
u5 loc1
u6 loc3
</pre>
<pre>
Post
post_id user_id
p1 u1
p2 u1
p3 u2
p4 u3
p5 u1
p6 u2
</pre>
I am trying to write an SQL query - for each country of users, display the average number of posts
I understand the logic behind this that we first need to group together all the locations and then the users belonging to one country and then find the average of their posts.
But, i'm having a difficulty in putting this in SQL form. Could someone please help me with this query.
Thanks.select
country.country,
count(*) Totalpostspercountry,
count(distinct post.user_id) Totaldistincuserspercountry,
count(*)/count(distinct post.user_id) Avgpostsperuserbycountry
from
country, muser, post
where country.location_id = muser.location_id
and muser.user_id = post.user_id
group by country.country
The output is like this for your sample data - hope this is what you were looking for :)
COUNTRY,TOTALPOSTSPERCOUNTRY,TOTALDISTINCUSERSPERCOUNTRY,AVGPOSTSPERUSERBYCOUNTRY
England,1,1,1,
Spain,5,2,2.5, -
Can any one help with this query please
I have a table something as below
Things_t
Things Characteristic Char Value
Item 1 Colour Red
Item 1 Packaging
Item 2 Shape Square
Item 2 Brand Spunk
Now i want to reterive an item with none of its char values as Null. Using the query “ select distinct things from things_t where char value is Null ” will fetch the item 1 also together with item 2. i want to fetch a record from thing for which none of the char values are Null such as Item 2. Can you please help me with this query.Try this:
WITH t AS
(SELECT 1 item_id, 17436 chr_id, 14225034 chr_val_id FROM dual UNION
SELECT 1 item_id, 39 chr_id, 14276173 chr_val_id FROM dual UNION
SELECT 1 item_id, 17774 chr_id, NULL chr_val_id FROM dual UNION
SELECT 1 item_id, 265 chr_id, 20502978 chr_val_id FROM dual UNION
SELECT 1 item_id, 16978 chr_id, 797233 chr_val_id FROM dual UNION
SELECT 1 item_id, 13092 chr_id, 5666917 chr_val_id FROM dual UNION
SELECT 1 item_id, 15228 chr_id, 1209758 chr_val_id FROM dual UNION
SELECT 2 item_id, 112 chr_id, 12705342 chr_val_id FROM dual UNION
SELECT 2 item_id, 6945 chr_id, NULL chr_val_id FROM dual UNION
SELECT 2 item_id, 70 chr_id, 12597376 chr_val_id FROM dual UNION
SELECT 2 item_id, 16832 chr_id, NULL chr_val_id FROM dual UNION
SELECT 2 item_id, 7886 chr_id, 9588619 chr_val_id FROM dual UNION
SELECT 2 item_id, 6986 chr_id, 2659351 chr_val_id FROM dual UNION
SELECT 3 item_id, 9531 chr_id, 8910943 chr_val_id FROM dual UNION
SELECT 3 item_id, 9798 chr_id, 8717531 chr_val_id FROM dual UNION
SELECT 3 item_id, 17446 chr_id, 12266441 chr_val_id FROM dual UNION
SELECT 3 item_id, 4830 chr_id, 13683090 chr_val_id FROM dual UNION
SELECT 3 item_id, 9518 chr_id, 834772 chr_val_id FROM dual UNION
SELECT 3 item_id, 11031 chr_id, 20233753 chr_val_id FROM dual UNION
SELECT 3 item_id, 12564 chr_id, 2282478 chr_val_id FROM dual)
SELECT DISTINCT item_id
FROM t
MINUS
SELECT DISTINCT item_id
FROM t
WHERE chr_val_id IS NULLOr this:
SELECT item_id
FROM (SELECT item_id,
MIN(NVL(chr_val_id, -1)) min_chr_val_id
FROM t
GROUP BY item_id)
WHERE min_chr_val_id != -1Edited by: lee200 on Oct 15, 2012 9:22 AM -
when i connect i5 to itunes .. i dont get "delete" option for songs upon right click .. can anyone help me with this plz?
Yes, annoying. A couple of options:
While it's playing the current A song, click on the H song to select it (but not double click to play it), when iTunes jumps to the second A song, press the down key and iTunes will remember that you had that H song selected and will move the selection to the second H song while the second A song is still playing. So, still jumps around, but easy to get back to where you were.
Create a new playlist for your music, right click on it, select "New Window" and you can browse your music in a second list while the first window continues to play music. But if you then start playing music in that second window, you have to go back to the first window if you want to start browsing again. Not great if you're navigating around to play the next song.
Play music from iTunes DJ, then as you're browsing around your library, you can add things to play next in DJ, and go back. You can combine this with previous suggestion, to keep DJ open in one window while you browser in the other window.
None of these are great, but maybe one of these works better than your current workflow. -
Please need help with this query
Hi !
Please need help with this query:
Needs to show (in cases of more than 1 loan offer) the latest create_date one time.
Meaning, In cases the USER_ID, LOAN_ID, CREATE_DATE are the same need to show only the latest, Thanks!!!
select distinct a.id,
create_date,
a.loanid,
a.rate,
a.pays,
a.gracetime,
a.emailtosend,
d.first_name,
d.last_name,
a.user_id
from CLAL_LOANCALC_DET a,
loan_Calculator b,
bv_user_profile c,
bv_mr_user_profile d
where b.loanid = a.loanid
and c.NET_USER_NO = a.resp_id
and d.user_id = c.user_id
and a.is_partner is null
and a.create_date between
TO_DATE('6/3/2008 01:00:00', 'DD/MM/YY HH24:MI:SS') and
TO_DATE('27/3/2008 23:59:00', 'DD/MM/YY HH24:MI:SS')
order by a.create_datePerhaps something like this...
select id, create_date, loanid, rate, pays, gracetime, emailtosend, first_name, last_name, user_id
from (
select distinct a.id,
create_date,
a.loanid,
a.rate,
a.pays,
a.gracetime,
a.emailtosend,
d.first_name,
d.last_name,
a.user_id,
max(create_date) over (partition by a.user_id, a.loadid) as max_create_date
from CLAL_LOANCALC_DET a,
loan_Calculator b,
bv_user_profile c,
bv_mr_user_profile d
where b.loanid = a.loanid
and c.NET_USER_NO = a.resp_id
and d.user_id = c.user_id
and a.is_partner is null
and a.create_date between
TO_DATE('6/3/2008 01:00:00', 'DD/MM/YY HH24:MI:SS') and
TO_DATE('27/3/2008 23:59:00', 'DD/MM/YY HH24:MI:SS')
where create_date = max_create_date
order by create_date -
I have a macbook Pro i7 mid november 2010. I am wondering if i can exchange my notebook with the latest one. Can anyone help me out with this query please.
You can sell your existing computer using eBay, Craigslist or the venue of your choice. You could then use the proceeds to purchase a new computer.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Lost decimal point after export to text file
Dear All, I have problem which to beset me long long time. I haven't dug the cause yet. Actually, I have a program which will generate a text file in background everyday. The text file included po data which is create last day, such as po no, item, u
-
Queries related to DMS and Archive link
Hi Experts, 1. Is it possible to link documents in MIGO or FB03 through Archive link with documents already stored via OAWD or CV01N. 2. Can we use any single transaction code for reporting purpose where we can find all the documents stored via DMS a
-
A series of video files (0001.MTS to 0005.MTS) were imported into premiere, when moved to timeline premiere combined them and made them look like one long clip named 0001.MTS. Multiple motion edits and opacity edits were made. When project manager mo
-
The bookmarks/urls are GONE. Went to Mozilla's help files and their directions didn't fly--so I would like and older working version.
-
Invoice creation problem in SRM 5.0
Hi, When I am trying to create invoice in SRM system fora particular PO. It gives me error "no item found for PO number ....". Therfoe I am not able to generate any invoice in the system. ECC is 6.0 with unicode and SRM is 5.0 nonunicode system. Pl