Default Configuration files

If you sequence an app-v 5.0 package it output's an .appv and _DeploymentConfig.xml and _UserConfig.xml (and .msi wrapper).
By default the .appv contains the same information as in the _DeploymentConfig.xml and _UserConfig.xml (?)
Therefore one can assume that when using Add-AppvClientPackage of Publish-AppvClientpackage you do not have to specify -DynamicDeploymentConfiguration or -DynamicUserConfigurationPath when those .xml files are not changed?

Correct, the XML files provide a more convenient method for package customization by removing the need to re-sequence packages using the desired settings, and provides a way to keep package content and custom settings independent.
If you want to adjust the defaults you can edit the files, then the parameter -DynamicDeploymentConfiguration is necessary or you have to import the XML file in the App-v Management Console.
More info here

Similar Messages

MS ssis service: registry setting specifying configuration file does not exist. attempting to load default configuration file. SQLIService100 - event id 274

window 2008 R2 server ---- after installing SQL 2008 R2 then applying sp2 / sp3 I noted a warning -
Note this server had SQL 2008 R2 uninstalled previously.
MS ssis service: registry setting specifying configuration file does not exist. attempting to load default configuration file.
SQLIService100 - source
event id- 274
user - N/A
Task category - service control.
Do we need to fix something and how do we fix this warning event?
dsk

You could search online for this warning. I was able to find http://superuser.com/questions/346264/event-log-warning-registry-setting-specifying-configuration-file-does-not-exist
where the fix is "in your registry, go to:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\MSDTS\ServiceConfigFile
or
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Microsoft SQL Server\100\ServiceConfigFile
if value is empty then add in:
C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\100\DTS\Binn\MsDtsSrvr.ini.xml"
Arthur
MyBlog
Twitter

System wide default configuration files?

I have six people using the computer, and I don't want to have to configure starting Wicd in the tray for each user or font configuration...
Is there a way to set up configuration files for new users like Ubuntu and all of the other "tweaked" distros do?

Doesn't matter where you copy the config files from, so long as they're valid and do what you want.
Whether configuring your user will give you ~/.config files that do what you want depends. For example, if there's an existing /etc/foo_config file, and you set up your ~/.foo_config file in a way that (whether you realize it or not) depends on the stuff in /etc/foo_config being the system default, and then you copy your ~/.foo_config file to /etc/foo_config (overwriting the old file), then no, it won't work. If you avoid mistakes like that, and end up with ~/.foo_config files that all on their own do what you want, then sure, it will work. (Just check their permissions after you copy them to /etc.)

Setting Default Configuration in 1.4.2

Previous versions of Java Web Start had a default configuration file javaws.cfg which contained the default preferences. When JWS was installed on PCs in our intranet, we could switch the cfg file to one which, amongst other things, set the proxy correctly and disabled shortcut creation. Then when any other user logged on to the PC, they would get a copy of this cfg file.
But in JWS 1.4.2 there no longer seems to be a default cfg file. When a user logs on they get defaults which are incorrect for our environment. This is a problem when several different users share the same PC. Whenever a new user logs on to the PC and uses Java Web Start, we must set up the preferences manually.
Our users are in a call center and are not capable of setting preferences themselves. In fact in the past we have removed the JWS icon from the desktop because we don't want them to even know it exists. All they know how to do is click a link (to a jnlp document) on a web page.
Is there some way to set the default preferences at install time that I've missed?
Thanks,
Simon.

Educated guesswork mostly; read over the JavaOne "whats new with web start" to get a feel for the changes yourself (http://servlet.java.sun.com/javaone/sf2003/conf/sessions/display-1486.en.jsp). Several things here will lead to internal changes. While it's location isn't likely to change (they're in the right place now - in the user profile dir) the contents, structure and config files certainly will.
Biggest single change is the unification of Java Plugin and Web Start, according to the slides this includes the merging of the applet & web start caches and configuration dialogs (it's not a big leap to assume this means merging their config files also). The new 1.5 Jar Hyper Compression format will also doubtless come into play changing the very format of the Jars getting cached. The other big change is to the security system - both opening up the sandbox model and a new central administration system will mean that the preferences on a users machine may be overridden at any time by the administrator. The cache structure itself undergos a big change with the new 'System Cache' - given that users cannot read from another users profile, this system cache will need to be stored in some shared directory elsewhere. A move that will split normal operation into a pair of active caches further obfuscates assumptions about the internal structure somewhat. This only scratches the surface here - needless to say, big changes ahead.
For the 'system cache' It'll be interesting to see how the web start team get around the default privileges assigned to a domain user under XP typically doesn't allow writing to a directory outside of their user profile folder (default privs are restricted). Similarly I'd like to see how well the new JNLP file associations work out in a similar scenario. Adding a file association requires writing to the registry; this again is typically a prohibited operation requiring local administrator rights to the machine. I hope the web start team have come up with answers to these problems and not just take the Java update line of only working while the user is logged on as a local administrator (http://www.javadesktop.org/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=184&tstart=0). This severely limits your user base to non-networked single user machines (home users), the network admins machine and windows 98 & me boxes which don't share the security model.
Finally it's not a good idea to make any assumptions about the internal layout and contents of any of Sun's undocumented services, it's always going to be prone to change without warning. Developers make changes to these at their own peril and only have themselves to blame when their code suddenly stops working.
- Richard

How to enforce a different configuration file while invoking SAPShcut.exe

I'm using sapshcut.exe to logon to SAP. Following is syntax of command that Iu2019m using for that prupose:
sapshcut.exe /sysname=IDES /client=800 /user=xxxx /pwd=yyyy
By default, the configuration file (saplogon.ini) that is being used during this process by sapshcut.exe is located in user directory (SAP GUI 7.2). However, Iu2019d like to use a different configuration file that is located at other location (e.g., h:/test/saplogon.ini). SAP has mentioned to use additional parameter "INI_FILE" for that purposes so Iu2019m using following command:
sapshcut.exe /sysname=IDES /client=800 /user=xxxx /pwd=yyyy /INI_FILE=h:/test/saplogon.ini
No matter what value I defined for the u2018INI_FILEu2019 parameter, SAP ignores it and always uses default configuration file located in the user directory and if given SAP system does not exist in that configuration file then I report an error. Interestingly, I found that if use 'saplogon.exe' instead of 'sapshcut.exe' and provide same parameter value for 'INI_FILE' parameter then SAP overwrite the default configuration file and uses saplogon.ini defined there. But i cannot use saplogon.exe as I must have to use sapchcut.exe to directly log into SAP system for automation testing.
I've also found out that the only way sapshcut.exe can overwrite the default ini file is through the use of environment variable "SAPLOGON_INI_FILE". But rather than using environment variable I'd like to define configuration file during the command line.
Any help would be really appreciated.

We stumbled upon the same problem. Thank you for mentioning that using the environment variable works.
This leads to the following single command line as a workaround.
First set the needed saplogon.ini and then execute in a nested command shell the call to sapshcut.exe
cmd /c set SAPLOGON_INI_FILE=C:\config\saplogon.ini & cmd /c "%ProgramFiles%\SAP\FrontEnd\SAPgui\sapshcut.exe" -user= -pw= -language=E -system=XXX -client=100
This works, but only if there is not already an instance of saplogon.exe running with a different saplogon.ini.
Best regards,
Axel.

Configure:3955: checking for C compiler default output file name

Hi,
I am trying to configure oracle bsd on AIX and got the below error,
# sh /ldap/db-4.6.21.NC/dist/configure
checking build system type... powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0
checking host system type... powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0
checking if building in the top-level or dist directories... no
checking if --disable-cryptography option specified... no
checking if --disable-hash option specified... no
checking if --disable-mutexsupport option specified... no
checking if --disable-queue option specified... no
checking if --disable-replication option specified... no
checking if --disable-statistics option specified... no
checking if --disable-verify option specified... no
checking if --enable-compat185 option specified... no
checking if --enable-cxx option specified... no
checking if --enable-debug option specified... no
checking if --enable-debug_rop option specified... no
checking if --enable-debug_wop option specified... no
checking if --enable-diagnostic option specified... no
checking if --enable-dump185 option specified... no
checking if --enable-java option specified... no
checking if --enable-mingw option specified... no
checking if --enable-fine_grained_lock_manager option specified... no
checking if --enable-o_direct option specified... no
checking if --enable-posixmutexes option specified... no
checking if --enable-pthread_api option specified... no
checking if --enable-rpc option specified... no
checking if --enable-smallbuild option specified... no
checking if --enable-tcl option specified... no
checking if --enable-test option specified... no
checking if --enable-uimutexes option specified... no
checking if --enable-umrw option specified... no
checking if --with-mutex=MUTEX option specified... no
checking if --with-tcl=DIR option specified... no
checking if --with-uniquename=NAME option specified... no
checking for chmod... chmod
checking for cp... cp
checking for ln... ln
checking for mkdir... mkdir
checking for rm... rm
checking for sh... /usr/bin/sh
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /ldap/db-4.6.21.NC/dist/install-sh -c
checking for C compiler default output file name...
configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
See `config.log' for more details.
and in config.log,
configure:3955: checking for C compiler default output file name
configure:3982: xlc_r -O2 -D_THREAD_SAFE -Wl,-brtl conftest.c >&5
/ldap/db-4.6.21.NC/dist/configure[3983]: xlc_r: not found
configure:3985: $? = 127
configure:4023: result:
configure: failed program was:
| /* confdefs.h. */
| #define PACKAGE_NAME "Berkeley DB"
| #define PACKAGE_TARNAME "db-4.6.21"
| #define PACKAGE_VERSION "4.6.21"
| #define PACKAGE_STRING "Berkeley DB 4.6.21"
| #define PACKAGE_BUGREPORT "Oracle Technology Network Berkeley DB forum"
| #define HAVE_UPGRADE_SUPPORT 1
| /* end confdefs.h. */
|
Is this beacase valid c compiler not existing?
# which cc
which: 0652-141 There is no cc in /usr/bin /etc /usr/sbin /usr/ucb /usr/bin/X11 /sbin /usr/java14/jre/bin /usr/java14/bin.
# ksh: which:: not found.
# which c
which: 0652-141 There is no c in /usr/bin /etc /usr/sbin /usr/ucb /usr/bin/X11 /sbin /usr/java14/jre/bin /usr/java14/bin.
Thanks,
Message was edited by:
GK Joe

Joe,
I presume you are trying to build Oracle BDB and not bsd as you have mentioned.
Yes, the error message you are getting is for not having the CC compiler in your system or the path isn't set. Check in the /usr/vac/bin directory if you have one in your system. You might find both xlc and cc compiler there. Set this directory to your path so that 'configure' can see it.
Regards,
-Debsubhra

'configuration file does not specify default realm'

Hi,
I am using below solaris 10 OS version:
[root@nlxsl009 ~]$ cat /etc/release
Solaris 10 5/09 s10s_u7wos_08 SPARC
Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Use is subject to license terms.
Assembled 30 March 2009
The Kerberos version available on our Solaris 10 OS is: MIT Kerberos V5.
I had installed the Kerberos from the instruction given at MIT Kerberos site but getting following error:
'configuration file does not specify default realm'.
I tried to configure my KDC but it seems my Kerberos was not installed properly.
Can you refer any site from where I can properly install Kerberos from Solaris10 OS DVD?
Thanks and Regards
Anand Deshmane
Edited by: ananddeshmane on Apr 1, 2010 7:20 AM

I think you need to post this question to a Solaris forum, it is definetely not a Oracle Database Installation question.
-Andy

Generate configuration file with non-default binding configuration in WCF 4.5

Hi,
I am using WCF 4.5 for generating configuration file.
I have referred following MSDN link for generating configuration file.
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh309266(v=vs.110).aspx
I want binding property for e.g 'maxReceivedMessageSize' in configuration file.
I changed default value of 'maxReceivedMessageSize' to non-default value, but i could not able to saw 'maxReceivedMessageSize' binding property in configuration file.
Is anyone know why i am not able to see non-default value in configuration file.
Thanks.

Hi Amy,
Thanks for reply. Please see below content of configuration file.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<configuration>
<system.serviceModel>
<bindings>
<netTcpBinding>
<binding name="TestCustBind_CustomerService" />
</netTcpBinding>
</bindings>
<client>
<endpoint address="net.tcp://ABC/CustTest"
binding="netTcpBinding" bindingConfiguration="TestCustBind_CustomerService"
contract="CustomerService" name="TestCustBind_CustomerService">
<identity>
<userPrincipalName value="[email protected]" />
</identity>
</endpoint>
</client>
</system.serviceModel>
</configuration>
Thanks.

Reading Encrypted Password from Configuration File and Decrypt it at login

Hi All,
My application reads a configuration file to connect to the ORACLE database. The values defined for password are clear text as given below:
user: 'mh'
password='abcd1234'
Is there is any way I can give an encrypted password in the configuration file instead of a clear text file and at the time of login ORACLE decrypts it. I am using ORACLE 11g Database.
My company have a requirement that passwords are not stored in the clear in properties files. the reason being I suppose that if the password is stored in plaintext someone could hit the property file directly, get the password and then connect to the database with it.
For a regular user connecting through an Oracle client or SQL Developer they would need to have the plaintext password in order to connect.
its based on the requirements of
International Standards Organization Guidance
ISO 17799 � 9.5.4 requires password management systems to:
� enforce the use of individual passwords
� allow users to select and change their own passwords if appropriate
� enforce a choice of quality passwords
� force regular changes of passwords
� maintain a record of previous user passwords to prevent re-use
� not display passwords when they are being entered
� store password files separately from application system data
� store passwords in encrypted form using a one way encryption algorithm
� alter default vendor passwords following installation of software
So if I can store the password encrypted using a one way algorithm then hacker/user couldn't decrypt it and then access the database.
I have feeling there is a way of configuring this in Oracle advanced Security, but just can't quite get it to work.
Edited by: user5568473 on 20-May-2013 00:05

So if I can store the password encrypted using a one way algorithm then hacker/user couldn't decrypt it and then access the database.... and neither can your application. Encryption is needed in this case. The decryption must be written into your application. I've written my own in some cases, but finding a library for your development language is a smarter solution.
One alternative is using an Oracle wallet. It doesn't fit every circumstance and does have some maintenance headaches.
You can set up a basic secure password store to encrypt and store the password for a given user@instance combination, and then connect to the database without passing a password. SQL*Net adds in the appropriate password from the wallet for when you connect.
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/database/security/twp-db-security-secure-ext-pwd-stor-133399.pdf
Advanced Security Option also allows you to set up a Public Key Infrastructure connections (SSL encryption and/or authentication). It also uses a wallet to store the SSL certificates and credentials. I don't have personal experience on this approach.
SSL and the wallet allow you to connect to the database similar to CONNECT/@net_service_name or sqlplus /@net_service_namehttp://docs.oracle.com/cd/B28359_01/network.111/b28530/asossl.htm#CIHCBIEG

The configuration file did not contain well formed AppV configuration XML - When using Office 2013 ODT package

All,
I'm experiencing an issue where when using the Office 2013 package pulled down from ODT, that if I try to change the locations of either InfoPath Filler 2013 or Publisher 2013 from the default of Microsoft Office 2013 then I receive the message "The
configuration file did not contain well formed AppV configuration XML. Please check the management server event log for more information". If I check Applications and Services\Microsoft\AppV\Server-Management\Admin the error displayed there is "An
error was encountered parsing dynamic configuration file '0'. However I am able to change the shortcut location for all other applications except the above 2. I've tried redownloading the files using the ODT and also changing the version number (so far I've
tried both the 15.0.4631.1002 and 15.0.4659.1001 with the same result).
As all I'm interested in so far is having a package which contains Visio and Project I've tried following the article to exclude all the other Office elements:
http://technet.microsoft.com/library/jj219426(v=office.15).aspx#BKMK_ExcludeAppElement. However the package looks to be the same and when I load it into the management console all the options and elements to Office 2013 are available like they were before
when I hadn't set the exclude tags so I'm not sure whether the ExcludeApp parameters actually work correctly.
This then brings me onto the 3rd issue I've experienced. I have a group for the Visio users and I've set custom security for them to have Visio delivered to them but not Project and then a seperate group for just Project users who will have Project delivered
to them but not have Visio. When testing this sometimes seems to work but other times it seems to trip out and a user just in the Project or Visio group will get all of the Office 2013 applications and under the default location of Microsoft Office 2013. When
trying to spot correlation with this it appears random and can happen to any user on any device. We have sequenced a few applications ourselves where different parts are needed for different users and we have successfully managed this using different security
groups for different applications, just as I'm trying here with Office 2013.
Has anyone else experienced the issue with the "did not contain well formed XML" as at the start of the post and how were you able to resolve this? Also has anyone any advice on how to troubleshoot the issue with the security seeming to trip out
and publish all applications within a package to a user regardless of whether they are in the correct group or not?
The management / publishing servers are 5.0.1224.0 which is SP1 HF4 and the clients are on SP2 HF5.
Thanks

Nicke,
The config files are UTF-8. I did find the same article as yourself, however when searching for the value ‘TakeoverExtensionPointsFrom46=’ within either of the configuration.xml files that text isn’t found.
No sinister reason not to share the file used, just it’s the same structure as referenced in the article:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn745895(v=office.15).aspx. The only difference being that I’m using ProPlusVolume and I’ve set a version number (which is the October
2014 update). I’ve even looked to follow the above example as closely as possible in just using the ExcludeApp ID of Access and InfoPath, just to try and prove the process. However I still get the usual full package. The version of the Click-to-Run setup.exe
I’m using is 15.0.4623.1001, so later than the version specified at the end of that article which is 15.0.4619.1000. Where can I expect to see the elements excluded? Will it be when loading the package into the management console or would it just not appear
on the machine when delivered?
<Configuration>
<Add SourcePath="C:\OfficeDeploymentToolV2" Version="15.0.4659.1001" OfficeClientEdition="32">
    <Product ID="ProPlusVolume">
      <Language ID="en-us" />
<ExcludeApp ID="Access" />
<ExcludeApp ID="InfoPath" />
    </Product>
</Add>
</Configuration>
3). We’ve not used global publishing in our environment yet so I will try that. I’ve set both GlobalRefreshEnabled and GlobalRefreshOnLogon to True and when using the command Get-AppvPublishingServer on the client I’m testing with I can see this is pulled
through correctly. I’ve also added the client name to the AD group used to grant access to the package and it is published. However nothing is pulling through onto the Client, so are there any steps I’ve missed or misinterpreted when looking to set this up?
I guess the global publishing is there to keep in with licensing for Office being per device? On a slight aside, as Windows licensing is being changed to allow per user licensing
http://www.zdnet.com/microsoft-to-make-per-user-windows-licensing-available-to-enterprise-customers-7000035401/ does anyone know if there are any plans to allow for Office / Project / Visio licenses to go per user as well? We’re a volume license customer
rather than subscription based so I think a lot of the options to selectively deploy Visio and Project are excluded for us.
Dan,
Ok that explains why the security could be tripping out then and leading to this result. As above I’ll try with global publishing and see how I get on.
From what I’ve read / watched I think only one Office 2013 package can be published to a machine, so we would be unable to have a separate package for Visio and a separate package for Project and then attempt to deliver
them both together. If a user wanted both Project and Visio then I guess we’d need to have a combined Project and Visio package to cover than scenario, but then 2 more separate Project and Visio packages for those who would only want either Project and Visio
(I think).
The scenario we’re looking at is to see whether we are able to deliver Project and / or Visio to different users through an AppV package and this will then cover users on XenApp or on fat clients. Only a small proportion of our
users will need access to Project and / or Visio so therefore we’d only have a small amount of Project and Visio licenses.
However from what I’ve tested up to this point and from what I’ve picked up from Forum posts / watched on TechEd sessions is that as publishing is Global and is unable to use different security groups for different elements of the
suite, then using Office through AppV is only suitable if you will be delivering the whole suite (including Project and Visio) to all of your users. So in a scenario where you’d only want certain elements to be delivered to a handful of users then you’d need
to keep with traditional ESD methods to have this installed onto fat clients and steer clear of XenApp. If wanting to install to XenApp then a lockdown tool like AppSense or AppLocker would also need to be brought into the equation.
Is my understanding above correct or have I missed some options / methods?
If the full Office package is always delivered but a company only has Office licenses and no Project and Visio licenses for all its users, how do they stop Project and Visio being delivered and being available? Or again if you have
this use case is the AppV method one which will be unsuitable?
Thanks

How can I Create a Client Configuration File for RemoteApp and Desktop Connection with Server 2012?

I have a working RDS RemoteApp site and looking to test out the feature in Windows 7 Control Panel\All Control Panel Items\RemoteApp and Desktop Connections
I came across this link: Create a Client Configuration File for RemoteApp and Desktop Connection and I believe this is what I need to do first, but these instructions are for
Server 2008, and I'm running 2012.
Any suggestions or tips on how I can begin testing this with Server 2012?

Hi,
You can manually enter the path to the 2012 feed and it will connect and download the RemoteApps and Desktop connections.
If you need a sample .wcx file I have posted one here a couple of times. If you want I will look for it and post a link.
-TP
I tried adding my URL's below, these are sample links that work for me right now for when I log into the web page, but neither of these work. And I'm not sure what I would need to do with or how to create a .wcx file.
When I type in my URL of: https://connect.mydomain.org/RDWeb, I get redirected to:
https://connect.mydomain.org/RDWeb/Pages/en-US/login.aspx?ReturnUrl=/RDWeb/Pages/en-US/Default.aspx

Configuration File Caching

I am having a strange issue with some of my configuration files in WLS 10.3. I have deployed OIM/SOA as managed servers on a remote machine. Whenever I update the logging.xml file to include additional logging information, the file is wiped out after I restart the instance. I cannot figure out where this default file is coming from. Any ideas on what may be causing this strange behavior?
Thanks,
Pete

I have similiar problem with partition listener. But made it work by addling <class-name>.
So give this a try
<member-listener><class-name>com.sample.MemberEventLogger</class-name></member-listener>

Logging with jdk1.4 - how to add a handler using configuration file

Hi, all
I am playing around with java.util.logging in jdk1.4. In particular, I am using a properties file for configuration. However, one thing I couldn't do is to assign a handler, such as the ConsoleHandler, to the com.xyz.foo logger. Everything for the root logger works just fine. Here's the file I use
handlers= java.util.logging.FileHandler
.level= INFO
java.util.logging.FileHandler.pattern = jdk14.log
java.util.logging.FileHandler.limit = 50000
java.util.logging.FileHandler.count = 1
java.util.logging.FileHandler.formatter = java.util.logging.XMLFormatter
java.util.logging.ConsoleHandler.level = INFO
java.util.logging.ConsoleHandler.formatter = java.util.logging.SimpleFormatter
com.xyz.foo.level = WARNING
com.xyz.foo.handlers = java.util.logging.ConsoleHandler
Nothing comes out on the console and everything from the com.xyz.foo logger is logged to jdk14.log file.
Can any one tell me why the last line has no effect?
Thanks much!

Logger configuration files are grossly misunderstood due in large part to extremely poor documentation (some of the worst I have ever seen for the Java platform). The LogManager class uses logger configuration files to do three things:
1. Load porperties into a private Properties object that application programmers can subsequently access using the getProperty(String name) method in LogManager.
2. Those properties (or else the documented defaults) are then used to configure the root logger as well as the "global" handlers that are used by the root logger
3. Finally, whenever a logger is created the Properties object is checked to see if a key exists for the logger name + ".limit". If so, then the logger is assigned that level.
Notice that nowhere in here does it say that a programmatically created logger is configured. In your case, you must invoke getProperty("com.xyz.foo.handlers"), parse the property value (which is a bit tricky if there is more than one handler class name), load and instantiate the handler class, and invoke addHandler. Great huh? I'm in the middle of a indepth study of logger configuration, and I can tell you for sure the static configuration using configuration files is an order of magnitude harder than dynamic configuration. It offers the advantage of field service engineers being able to change the logger configuration, but at a very significant cost.

Error while opening UWL configuration file

Hello SDN,
I am customizing UWL config file. I have download file and saved it to desktop. But while opening that file i am getting following error.
The system cannot locate the resource specified. Error processing resource 'uwl_configuration.dtd'. Can you please tell me how to download and customize file.
regards,
Sree.

Hi Sushil,
I have followed the same procedure what you have explained. But when i am opening XML file with XML editor , it is not opening and not giving any error. But when open with word it is saying "file must contain one root element".
When open with notepad below is the content.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<!ELEMENT UWLConfiguration (Principals?, DescriptionBundles?, Actions?, ItemTypes?, Views?, GlobalDisplayAttributes?, NavigationNode?)>
<!ATTLIST UWLConfiguration
     version CDATA "1.0"
>




<!ELEMENT Principals (Principal+)>
<!ELEMENT Principal EMPTY>
<!ATTLIST Principal uniqueID CDATA #REQUIRED>

<!ELEMENT ItemTypes (ItemType*)>
<!ELEMENT Views (View*)>

<!ELEMENT ItemType (Caching?, ItemTypeCriteria?, CustomAttributes?, Actions?, Menu?)>
<!ATTLIST ItemType
     name NMTOKEN #REQUIRED
     connector CDATA #REQUIRED
     defaultView NMTOKEN #REQUIRED
     defaultAction NMTOKEN #IMPLIED
     executionMode (optimistic|pessimistic|default) "default"
> following file like this........
when i copy the content directly from portal below is the format....
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE UWLConfiguration PUBLIC '-//SAP//UWL1.0//EN' 'uwl_configuration.dtd'
>
<UWLConfiguration version="1.0">
<ItemTypes>
    <ItemType name="uwl.task.webflow.TS01000096.ESS_Webdynpro" connector="WebFlowConnector" defaultView="DefaultView" defaultAction="launchSAPAction" executionMode="default">
      <ItemTypeCriteria systemId="ESS_Webdynpro" externalType="TS01000096" connector="WebFlowConnector"/>
      <Actions>
        <Action name="launchSAPAction" groupAction="" handler="SAPIACLauncher" returnToDetailViewAllowed="yes" launchInNewWindow="yes" launchNewWindowFeatures="resizable=yes,scrollbars=yes,status=yes,toolbar=no,menubar=no,location=no,directories=no">
          <Properties>
            <Property name="newWindowFeatures" value="resizable=yes,scrollbars=yes,status=yes,toolbar=no,menubar=no,location=no,directories=no"/>
            <Property name="openInNewWindow" value="yes"/>
            <Property name="display_order_priority" value="5"/>
            <Property name="IAC" value="WS01000060"/>
          </Properties>
          <Descriptions default=""/>
        </Action>
      </Actions>
    </ItemType>
    <ItemType name="uwl.task.webflow.TS01000097.ESS_Webdynpro" connector="WebFlowConnector" defaultView="DefaultView" defaultAction="launchSAPAction" executionMode="default">
      <ItemTypeCriteria systemId="ESS_Webdynpro" externalType="TS01000097" connector="WebFlowConnector"/>
      <Actions>
Can you please check and let me know if anything is missing.
regards,
Sree.

Cannot find the configuration file in classpath

Cannot find the configuration file /oracle/apps/prc/po/....applicationModule/common/bc4j.xcfg in the classpath.
Hi!
I'm trying to run the following code:
String appModule = "oracle.apps.prc.po.manageDocument.uiModel.viewDocument.applicationModule.ViewPurchasingDocumentApplicationModule";
String cfg = "ViewPurchasingDocumentApplicationModuleLocal";
ApplicationModule applicationModule = (ApplicationModule)Configuration.createRootApplicationModule(appModule, cfg);
I get this error message:
Exception in thread "main" oracle.jbo.ConfigException: JBO-33001: Cannot find the configuration file /oracle/apps/prc/po/manageDocument/uiModel/viewDocument/applicationModule/common/bc4j.xcfg in the classpath
     at oracle.jbo.client.Configuration.loadFromClassPath(Configuration.java:430)
     at oracle.jbo.common.ampool.PoolMgr.createPool(PoolMgr.java:293)
     at oracle.jbo.common.ampool.PoolMgr.findPool(PoolMgr.java:557)
     at oracle.jbo.client.Configuration.createRootApplicationModule(Configuration.java:1334)
     at oracle.jbo.client.Configuration.createRootApplicationModule(Configuration.java:1312)
     at oracle.apps.prc.po.manageDocument.model.viewPdf.generateXml.getXMLData(generateXml.java:26)
     at oracle.apps.prc.po.manageDocument.model.viewPdf.generateXml.main(generateXml.java:39)
I have checked and the config file does exist in the correct directory, and I can see it in my Application Module - Configurations. Any idea why this is happening? Am I supposed to configure something specifically for this or add it in my classpath? If so, how am I supposed to do it?
Thanks
Mansi
Edited by: Mansi G on Oct 6, 2008 11:56 AM

Where is the code you posted? Running in a separate project, I assume? Does that project have a dependency on the project containing the app module specified?
And just to check (although by default, JDev should do this for you)--the app module project has been compiled since adding the configuration, right? You need to check to make sure the config exists not only under Project/src, but under Project/classes.
Edited by: Avrom Roy-Faderman on Oct 6, 2008 2:02 PM
Oh, and BTW--I assume this is not a typical ADF application, right? In a standard ADF application, you would very rarely need to instantiate an application module in code like this; you could just let the data binding facility do it for you. The technique like the one you're using is most appropriate for purely programmatic, no-UI cases. (e.g., once I tried to implement an SMTP server backed by business components. That was an appropriate case for ditching databindings and doing the sort of thing you're doing, because it had no view layer (because it had no UI to render).

Default Configuration files

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for