Defferent work usleep in Solaris 10 and Solaris 9

I've compile program in Solaris 9 and Solaris 10(cc or gcc).
On Solaris 9 cpu load is lower then 1 %.
On Solaris 10 cpu load is more then 16%.
Why I have this big difference. 16% is very big for me.

I presume you compiled php on the Sun server, was this done using gcc or the Sun One C compiler.
If the latter then you can also use the flag: --enable-nonportable-atomics when you run configure                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   

Similar Messages

  • Why keyboard and mouse right click not working in Solaris and Linux?

    Hi all,
    I have two problems:
    1) I am working on AWT/Swing application and its working fine in window enviornment,but while running on solaris and linux mouse right-click option window not poping up.
    2) Ctrl+c,Ctrl+v,Home and End keyboard key are not working in solaris and linux OS for same application.
    Pls provide me some solution for these problem.
    -Dinesh

    Hi Nik,
    Thanks for reply. I found some solution for the above problem.
    For mouse right click there was problem in my source code.I have not implemented the mousePressed() method
    In case of keyboard Home, End and arrow key working fine after exporting AWTUSE_TYPE4_PATCH=false; in solaris and linux
    But still Ctrl-c and Ctrl-v not working.
    I am using JDK1.5.0_07+Eclipse IDE 3.1
    -Dinesh

  • Same EAR deployed on Win2K and Solaris works differently

    Hi,
    Deplying the same EAR, using the same deployment ant script, on 2 WLS 7.0 SP4
    on respectively Win2K and Solaris 8. While the Win2K application works correctly,
    the Solaris deployed one throws a ClassNotFound exception. The CLASSPATH is the
    same on both systems. Is there any special requirement or any post-installation
    task to be performed for Solaris ?
    Kind regards,
    Nicolas DUMINIL

    Strange as it is, we still need a stack trace. ;)
    Do you have one for the solaris CNF exception?
    cheers
    mbg
    "Nicolas DUMINIL" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:3f8ad0b0$[email protected]..
    >
    Hi,
    As an XML application, the deployed application uses JDOM. In the beginingI used
    to deploy JDOM together with the application, in the same EAR andreferencing
    it from MANIFEST.MF. Later I noticed that JDOM deployment was notmandatory and
    I thought that the server already had it inside. At this time I wasdeveloping
    on Win2K workstations. Now I'm going live on a Solaris server and the JDOMdeployment
    suddenly became mandatory. So, to resume, I don't need to deply JDOM onthe WebLogic
    7.0 SP4 for Win2K and everything works fine, but I need to deploy JDOM onthe
    WebLogic Server 7.0 SP4 on Solaris in order to avoid ClassNotFoundexceptions.
    Strange enough isn't it ?
    Kind regards,
    Nicolas
    "Ali Akbar" <[email protected]> wrote:
    Hello Nicolas,
    There should not be any special requirement for Solaris platform. Can
    you
    please attach the stack trace?
    "Nicolas DUMINIL" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:3f8679c5$[email protected]..
    Hi,
    Deplying the same EAR, using the same deployment ant script, on 2 WLS7.0
    SP4
    on respectively Win2K and Solaris 8. While the Win2K application workscorrectly,
    the Solaris deployed one throws a ClassNotFound exception. The
    CLASSPATH
    is the
    same on both systems. Is there any special requirement or anypost-installation
    task to be performed for Solaris ?
    Kind regards,
    Nicolas DUMINIL

  • Software works with iplanet and Solaris

    Hi,
    I'm interested in a software working like CrystalReport. The software has to work with iplanet and Solaris. I use jsp as GUI front to report.
    A appreciate you if you can suggest a product.
    Thanks.
    Jerry

    I don't use Quicken, but believe there is now a version that is compatible with Lion.

  • Samba and Solaris, access slow via XP

    Hi everyone,
    I've new to solaris and I've installed 10, update 5. I've configured samba (very badly I believe) so that I can access my solaris box from my XP 64 computer.
    Both are on a local network (connected via a Belkin router) and in the same workgroup. I can see the XP machine from solaris, but not access anything (I just get a 'cannot show contents of directory' message). This is not my main problem, since I mostly want to access the solaris system from XP (I want to set up the solaris box as a RAID Z NAS). This works to a degree. I can see and access my solaris filesystem from XP. Hurray. I have two problems:
    1. I have set guest to NO, but I never get asked for a password (I've set up an account on the solaris system with a password using smbpasswd). I just get access. Why is this? I don't want a bunch of ner-do-wels skulking about my server and erasing files and such.
    2. While I can stream music fine, after a minute or so, if I want to browse files from XP it stalls for about one minute (I think it is re-logging in) and while this happens any music being streamed stops. How do I stay connected and logged in? Here is my smb.conf:
    # Samba config file created using SWAT
    # from 192.168.2.3 (192.168.2.3)
    # Date: 2008/05/11 18:46:15
    [global]
         socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_KEEPALIVE IPTOS_LOWDELAY
         ldap ssl = no
    [home]
         read only = No
         guest ok = No
         available = No
    [homes]
         valid users = %S
         read only = No
         guest ok = No
    As you can tell I'm pretty new to all this so you may have to dumb down your answers a little. Thanks for the help.
    Cisco

    Yup.....repeatable!
    Delete mapped drive.
    Connect via USB
    Playbook shows in windows explorer as PlayBook [Pin: number] Y:  being the drive that XP has mapped it to.
    Then search for the PlayBook by ip address \\192.168.1.x
    It shows up under workgroup by its ip address
    Disconect USB cable
    Workgroup connect remains (via wifi)
    Strange to say the least.

  • Problem with Sessions, Servlets, Netscape and Solaris

    We are experiencing a problem that is confounding and frustrating us (I have
              a felling that it is something exremely minor that we are overlooking).
              Here goes:
              Context:
              The problem only occurs when using a netscape browser against weblogic
              4.51running on our Solaris 7 box (Everything works fine through IE, and
              through both browsers against our development machines which are on NT)
              Problem:
              We have a bunch of JSP pages and servlets that are used togehter throughout
              our site. They both manage session information for the user. What is
              happening is that there is no problem maintaining session information among
              all the JSP pages, but when we hit a servlet that we use to stream graphs
              back to the browser, it gets the session but it has no contents all of a
              sudden. What seems to be even more strange is that the session is not
              tagged as new (by checking isNew()), it is just empty of the contents that
              were placed it by the JSP pages. Again, this is only occurring from
              Netscape browsers against our Solaris server.
              If anyone can provide any help it would be greatly appreciated. I can
              provide more details if need be.
              Jeremy
              

    There is a property in the weblogic.properties file that lets you set
              the cookie name. If this isn't set, the port will be appended as part of
              the name. I've had a similar problem switching between http and https
              and losing sessions.
              Carles
              Jeremy wrote:
              >
              > in the link tothe servlet the URL had a :80 in it. This was because the url
              > was generated by a JSP page so that when it was moved from server to server
              > and port to port the code wouldn't have to be changed. Unfortuneately,
              > Netscape sucks and takes this to mean that x.x.x.x and x.x.x.x:80 are
              > different and won't acknowledge the cookie from the JSP pages (x.x.x.x) to
              > the servlet (x.x.x.x:80). Thanks fpr your help.
              >
              > Jeremy <[email protected]> wrote in message
              > news:[email protected]...
              > > my mistake, it appears to always happen on port 80 regardless of the
              > server
              > > it is on.
              > >
              > > Jeff Martin <[email protected]> wrote in message
              > > news:[email protected]...
              > > > It really sounds like your servlet is making a new session, even though
              > > > isNew() doesn't say so. What you might try to do is use session.getId()
              > > > to print out the session ID from your jsp pages as well as your servlets
              > > > to determine if it really is a new session.
              > > >
              > > > Do your servlets and JSPs both use the same scheme (http or https) or
              > > > cookie.setSecure()? Do your cookies use domains or paths in either
              > > > servlets or jsps (cookies can be restricted to certain subdirectories
              > > > which might be different between jsps and servlets)? Are you testing
              > > > through a proxy or firewall, or does either browser have different proxy
              > > > settings than the others?
              > > >
              > > > Jeff
              > > >
              > > > Jeremy wrote:
              > > > >
              > > > > We are experiencing a problem that is confounding and frustrating us
              > (I
              > > have
              > > > > a felling that it is something exremely minor that we are
              > overlooking).
              > > > > Here goes:
              > > > >
              > > > > Context:
              > > > > The problem only occurs when using a netscape browser against weblogic
              > > > > 4.51running on our Solaris 7 box (Everything works fine through IE,
              > and
              > > > > through both browsers against our development machines which are on
              > NT)
              > > > >
              > > > > Problem:
              > > > > We have a bunch of JSP pages and servlets that are used togehter
              > > throughout
              > > > > our site. They both manage session information for the user. What is
              > > > > happening is that there is no problem maintaining session information
              > > among
              > > > > all the JSP pages, but when we hit a servlet that we use to stream
              > > graphs
              > > > > back to the browser, it gets the session but it has no contents all of
              > a
              > > > > sudden. What seems to be even more strange is that the session is not
              > > > > tagged as new (by checking isNew()), it is just empty of the contents
              > > that
              > > > > were placed it by the JSP pages. Again, this is only occurring from
              > > > > Netscape browsers against our Solaris server.
              > > > >
              > > > > If anyone can provide any help it would be greatly appreciated. I can
              > > > > provide more details if need be.
              > > > >
              > > > > Jeremy
              > >
              > >
              

  • Vista and Solaris 10, are they compatible?

    I have attempted to follow dual boot guides found everywhere, but none tailor specifically to (or eve mention) Vista. This is a problem, because Vista does not use the same method of boot as previous versions of NT.
    So far, in my many failed attempts at creating a Vista dual boot, I have experienced this:
    When I install Solaris 10 on any partition (Solaris installs correctly and works great), and then attempt to install Windows Vista, Vista says all of my partitions do not meet its requirements for installation (that the drive is NTFS and at least 12 GB is all it tells me). Even after formatting, deleting, recreating, and reformatting a drive, the drive is still unusable. Only after deleting ALL drives, including Solaris 10, and recreating and brand new first partition does Vista allow me to install. If I create a partition that Vista allows me to use, and also a partition to use with Solaris, and THEN install Solaris, the partition that Vista liked can no longer be used!
    When I install Windows Vista first (and it works fine) (which is what I tried first and reasoned is what I should be doing), and then install Solaris 10 on a partition (it installs correctlt and works great), I load up my computer and go into the GRUB bootloader. I can select Windows. However, when attempting to load windows, I get an error (in the Vista font by the way) that says my operating system cannot be loaded. When I load my Vista install disc, it cannot find any installations of windows, and it cannot repair the master boot record, saying something like the filesystem is corrupt. However, just as an experiment, I loaded Vista onto the former Solaris drive, and looked at my first partition. Every file was there, intact.
    I have attempted this with Windows Home Premium 32 bit, Windows Business 32 bit, and Vista Ultimate x64. I don't want to believe that it's impossible to load Vista and Solaris simultaneously, I've seen as much stating its impossibility as I've seen documents telling me how to do it (<- cold irony).
    As long as I can get AN INSTALLATION of Solaris 10 on my machine at the same time I have Vista able to boot, I'm fine, but I seem to have lost on all fronts.
    Edited by: ZetaZeta on Sep 19, 2007 12:30 AM

    In Solaris Express, this is not an issue, according to this weblog:
    http://blogs.sun.com/moinakg/entry/solaris_vista_dual_boot_conclusion
    For versions of Solaris Express prior to buid 70, this method was described for creating a dual-boot with the oh-too-picky Windows Vista:
    http://linux.wordpress.com/2007/02/17/vista-and-solaris-express-dual-boot/
    I am going to assume that setting up a dual-boot with Solaris 10 is similar to, if not the same as, Solaris Express, since the only steps specific to Solaris are the files I copy from Solaris.
    I hope this helps anyone else with a problem similar to mine.

  • Windows Vista and  Solaris...10...install failed...help.

    Hi everyone!!
    i installed Solaris OS twice on my system
    i have vista previously on this...
    i made a partition for sol...
    after installation solaris boots fine
    but windows is totally corrupted and doestn boot normally
    ill have to erase the whole computers HD and then reinstall it again
    both the OSs are not working at the same time
    with solaris already installed if i try to repair or re install windows vista its erasing solaris partition totally
    please help!!! what should i do to get my system running with both OS s.
    any replies.....much awaited
    thank u so much in advance....
    -sriya
    Message was edited by:
    Sriya
    i have dell inspiron...just delivered yday...640m
    Message was edited by:
    Sriya

    Install Windows first, then Solaris {not the other way round}. When Solaris installer detects Windows installation and prompts you whether to preserve Windows partition, make sure to select 'preserve' option. I believe Solaris installer creates appropriate GRUB entries for Windows and Solaris. Even if it doesn't, you can always edit the GRUB menu after the installation is complete.
    Check the following web site if you need detailed instructions:
    http://multiboot.solaris-x86.org/index.html

  • Dual boot windows 7 and solaris 11

    Hi Friends,
    Could some one please explain the steps to install dual boot windows 7 and solaris 11?
    Thanks
    Raja

    Install Windows leaving a partition for Solaris.  Install Solaris into the empty partition.  Reboot.  Use a partition manager if you need to shrink your current Windows Partition.  GParted works great and is free.
    alan

  • Hyperlink is not working when running on sun solaris OS

    Hi,
    I have Created PDF file using oracle reports 2.5 version and included hyperlinks in reports which will open files located on our intranet server(http://cup2.ngc.co.uk). Hyperlinks are working properly when I generated report on window xp machine but not working when I compiled and executed report on solaris unix server(reports 6i).
    please let me know why hyperlinks is not working when executed on solaris((5.8). do we need any setup to work hyperlinks on unix server.
    Thanks in advance,

    Ok, there are 2 docs i've tried.
    A = Doc created originally from MPB Pages with hyperlink
    B = Doc created from iPad Pages with hyperlink
    A was transfered to iPad Pages using iTune. I emailed A as pdf from iPad to gmail and reopen the file on iPad using Quickoffice / PDF Reader Lite, the link is NOT active, not working. BUT, when i read A using MBP gmail, the link is ACTIVE, i click on the link and it brings me to the correct webpage.
    As for B, after the page was created with links on iPad, i emailed B as pdf from iPad to gmail, reopen the file on iPad using Quickoffice / PDF Reader Lite, the link is NOT active, and this time, when i read B using MBP gmail, the link is NOT active as well.
    Weird huh? I'm starting to sense that is the problem with iPad Pages. What say you?

  • SSH Differences between Solaris 9 and Solaris 10

    I use public key authentication when connecting via SSH but have noticed a difference between Solaris 9 and Solaris 10 and wondered if it's an environment setup issue. I keep my keys in $HOME/.ssh
    When connecting from Solaris 9 I can provide an identity file without a path regardless of the directory that I'm in e.g.
    ssh -i my_identity_file user@hostnameThe above works even if I'm not in the $HOME/.ssh directory. But when using the same from Solaris 10 I get the following error:
    Warning: Identity file my_identity_file does not exist.If I run the command from $HOME/.ssh on Solaris 10 it connects fine, and if I pass in the path like so it works fine:
    ssh -i $HOME/.ssh/my_identity_file user@hostnameIs there a setting specific to SSH somewhere as I can't see anything in my environment that's different between the two systems. There's certainly no entry in $PATH that points to $HOME/.ssh. How could I get SSH to work on Solaris 10 by just providing the identity file name and not the full path
    Regards
    Rich

    It's not explicitly defined in /etc/ssh/ssh_config, so I'm assuming it would be using the default which is ~/.ssh/id_dsa.
    But surely that's irrelevant if I'm using the -i switch to provide the identity file?
    Remember the problem here is that I have to provide a full path to the identity file, whereas before just the filename would do.
    Rich

  • Sample plugins not working with Netscape 7 on Solaris 8.

    I'm trying to build a scriptable plugin for deployment into Netscape 7
    and Solaris 8.
    I finally got mozilla 1.4.1 built under Solaris 8 and deployed the
    plugin from modules/plugin/tools/sdk/samples/simple. By deployed I
    mean that I copied the libnpsimple.so file to the netscape plugin
    directory and copied the .xpt files to the netscape components
    directory. I even removed the xpti.dat file from the netscape
    components directory so that it will get regenerated when netscape 7
    is started.
    I started up netscape 7 and checked about plugins and I find the
    simple plugin in the list of enabled plugins. So far, so good.
    I open the test.html file in modules/plugin/tools/sdk/samples/simple
    into the browser and click on the version button and I get an alert
    box that displays "undefined". Also, if I reload the page netscape
    crashes.
    I also tried the scriptable sample plugin with essentially the same
    result.
    Does anyone know what I need to do to get a sample plugin to work with
    Netscape 7 on Solaris 8.
    Some help would be very much appreciated.
    Thanks.

    Start by fixing the Xhtml coding errors:
    http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.frontiers.uk.net%2F&charset=%28detect+a utomatically%29&doctype=Inline&group=0
    And CSS errors:
    http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.frontiers.uk.net%2F&warn ing=1&profile=css21&usermedium=all
    Your 50% site stats probably include Mozilla/Firefox users.
    --Nancy O.
    Alt-Web Design & Publishing
    www.alt-web.com
    "pawpour" <[email protected]> wrote in
    message
    news:fbghtk$o3s$[email protected]..
    > Hello everybody
    >
    > My site is up at www.Frontiers.uk.net. I used
    Dreamweaver CS3, with CSS,
    on a
    > Mac.
    >
    > It seems to work fine in IE 6 & 7, Firefox and
    Safari. When doing a
    browser
    > compatibility check, I get one error: "Double float
    margin bug", which it
    says
    > affects IE 6. I don't think this is causing a problem.
    >
    > However in Netscape (I've only tried version 7) the site
    looks terrible -
    the
    > right hand link in the navbar drops down to the second
    line.
    >
    > Also, there are two DIVS, one floated left and one
    floating right, and in
    > Netscape the right one drops underneath the other. I
    know that there can
    be
    > problems with IE 5, in its dealing with margins but I
    havent heard
    anything
    > about Netscape being a problem? Also I thought that the
    IE box model bug
    can
    > just make the DIVS narrower, not make one drop below the
    other.
    >
    > Dreamweaver isn't throwing up any browser errors for
    Netscape.
    >
    > I thought that hardly anyone would use Netscape, but the
    stats for my
    site say
    > that around 50% of users are using Netscape (which i
    find hard to
    believe!)
    >
    > Any ideas what I've done wrong or how to fix this for
    Netscape?
    >

  • CATIA V5 and Solaris, how to do it???

    Hi people,
    I have a question that I cant seem to find clear and good answer, what system am I suppose to install V5 catia on, where can I download that particular version of solaris, and can that operating system run on the AMD processor or is there any difference between Intel/AMD processors for Solaris.
    Please if anybody has any knowledge on this metter.
    With Best Regards.
    Marko

    Hi Marko,
    This isn't gonna work I'm afraid: Dassault offers two binaries for Catia, Solaris SPARC and x86 Windows... In other words, the x86 version of Catia isn't going to be compatible with Solaris x86 as it's an MS Windows code...
    Now a little note of hope: PTC has released a version of Pro/E for Solaris x86, so if Dassault sees a market for this they will follow... All it takes is a big customer commited to Solaris x86 interested in Catia...

  • Windows NT 4.0 and Solaris 8

    Hello everyone,
    I have an Intel Pentium system with Windows NT 4.0 SP 6 and I would like to be able to install Solaris 8 on this system and dual-boot. I have 2 hard disks and I plan to install Solaris on the second one. The installation instruction says insert the "Solaris Installation" CD and boot the system. I tried that with the BIOS option set to boot from my CD but nothing happens and it just boots Windows NT as usual. Can anyone tell me what is wrong? I haven't partitioned the new hard disk yet - I was hoping to get into the Solaris installation first to do it.
    Please help.
    Thanks

    I have the same configuration you describe - NT (now W2K) on the primary master (NTFS) and Solaris on the secondary master. I deleted all partitions off the second disk using the W2K disk manager and installed Solaris to the second disk. I left 500 mb free on the second disk and after the Solaris install I formated the area as FAT16 for a common transfer area between the two OS's. It took me a while to get DSL to work on Solaris so I needed a big area for downloads for Solaris via W2K. I now automatically mount the area as /dos using vfstab. You can download bootpart 2.50 from http://www.winimage.com/bootpart.htm. This version has a LBA option for large disks. It copies the Solaris MBR over to the NT drive as a file and updates the boot.ini so you can select Solaris as a boot option from NT. It's not dangerous and you will get tired of that bios stuff real quick!
    Lee

  • Resource Management and Solaris Zones Developer Guide

    Solaris Information Products ("Pubs") is creating a
    developer guide for resource management and Solaris Zones.
    The department is seeking input on content from application
    developers and ISVs.
    We plan to discuss the different categories of applications
    that can take advantage of Solaris resource management
    features, and provide implementation examples that discuss
    the particular RM features that can be used.
    Although running in a zone poses no differences to most
    applications, we will describe any possible limitations and
    offer appropriate workarounds. We will also provide
    information needed by the ISV, such as determining
    the appropriate system calls to use in a non-global zone.
    We plan to use case studies to document the zones material.
    We would like to know the sorts of topics that you would
    like to see covered. We want to be sure that we address
    your specific development concerns with regard to these
    features.
    Thank you for your comments and suggestions.

    Hi there, i'm using solaris resource management in a
    server with more thant 2thousand acounts.
    Created profiles for users, defaul, staff, root and
    services.Seeing the contents of your /etc/project file could be helpful.
    But while using rctladm to enable syslog'ing, I set up
    global flags of "deny" and "no-local-action" in almos
    everything.The flags on the right hand side of the rctladm(1M) output are read-only:
    they are telling you the characteristics of the resource control in question (what
    operations the system will allow the resource control to take).
    Now, many aplications don't work because they are
    denied enough process.max-stack-size and
    process.max-file-descriptor for them to work.
    Applications such has prstat.If prstat(1) is failing due to the process.max-file-descriptor control value, that's
    probably a bug. prstat(1) is more likely bumping into the limit to assess how many file
    descriptors are available, and then carrying on--you're just seeing a log message since
    prstat(1) tested the file descriptor limit, and you've enabled syslog for that control. Please
    post the prstat(1) output, and we'll figure out if something's breaking.
    I don't find a way to disable the global flags. You can't. I would disable the syslog action on the process.max-stack-size control first;
    there is an outstanding bug on this control, in that it will report a false triggering event--
    no actual effect to the process. (If you send me some mail, I will add you as a call record
    on the bug.)
    Can anyone tell me:
    how to disable global flags?
    how to disable and enable solaris resource management
    all together?You could raise all of the control values, but the resource control facility (like the resource
    limit facility it superseded) is always active. Let's figure out if you're hitting the bug I mentioned,
    and then figure out how to proceed.
    - Stephen
    Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems
    [email protected]

Maybe you are looking for