Delayed/Manual Calculation

I would like to migrate to Numbers from Excel, but I have some pretty hefty spreadsheets. I currently use a control sheet to change values on other sheets. If I could delay calculation of the data on the control sheet, I could complete it and only have one 15 second delay.
Is this possible in Numbers? Is there a work around? Any help or ideas are appreciated. I do know Excel offers this option in under the Tools>Options>Calculation>Manual Calculation.
Thanks!
P.S. the update did decrease calculation time, but not significantly enough.

Hello
I am also wishing this feature but writing it here is quite useless due to the fact that there is quite no Apple engineer visiting this forum.
The official track is: go to "Provide Numbers Feedback" in the "Numbers" menu and describe what you wish. Doing that, Apple engineers will be aware of your wishes.
Yvan KOENIG (from FRANCE mercredi 3 octobre 2007 21:24:41)

Similar Messages

  • Manual calculation of 'Buffer Cache hit ratio'

    Using: Oracle 10.2.0.1.0, Redhat 4, 64bit.
    Manual calculation of ‘Buffer Cache hit ratio’ is very off from what it shown in statspack.
    Statspack shows:
    Instance Efficiency Percentages
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                Buffer Nowait %:  100.00       Redo NoWait %:   99.97
                Buffer  Hit   %:   99.18    In-memory Sort %:  100.00
                Library Hit   %:   90.43        Soft Parse %:   52.56
             Execute to Parse %:   80.14         Latch Hit %:   99.98
    Parse CPU to Parse Elapsd %:   96.21     % Non-Parse CPU:   56.89
    Manual calculation (Got this formula from Sybex PT book, page 275):
    SQL> select name, 1-(PHYSICAL_READS/(DB_BLOCK_GETS+CONSISTENT_GETS))
    from  v$buffer_pool_statistics;
    NAME                 1-(PHYSICAL_READS/(DB_BLOCK_GETS+CONSISTENT_GETS))
    DEFAULT                                                      .700247215Any idea, why using v$buffer_pool_statistics gives wrong results?
    Thanks regards,

    SYS@oradocms11> select (P1.value + P2.value - P3.value)/(P1.value + P2.value)*100
    2 from v$sysstat P1, v$sysstat P2, v$sysstat P3
    3 where P1.name = 'db block gets'
    4 and P2.name = 'consistent gets'
    5 and P3.name = 'physical reads';
    (P1.VALUE+P2.VALUE-P3.VALUE)/(P1.VALUE+P2.VALUE)*100
    99.6977839
    SYS@oradocms11> select name, 1 - (PHYSICAL_READS/(DB_BLOCK_GETS+CONSISTENT_GETS)) from v$buffer_pool_statistics
    NAME 1-(PHYSICAL_READS/(DB_BLOCK_GETS+CONSISTENT_GETS))
    DEFAULT .997009542
    In my case, both are giving almost same result.

  • Block users from retrieving during manual calculation

    Hi Everyone,
    I am wondering if anyone knows how to block users from retrieving or pulling in Essbase while a calculation is running manually in EAS. We have a currency conversion calculation that manipulates the data for several minutes. Users who pull the data see erroneous data for some time and it becomes an issue.
    Thanks,
    Mark

    You would have to log them out, then disable connects while you run your script. You could execute maxl commands from EAS.

  • User exit for manually calculating exchange rate in MIRO

    Dear All,
    i want to change, exchange rate in MIRO transaction.
    for that i have used user exit MRMH0003 (Logistics Invoice Verification: Revaluation/RAP), but unfortunately it doesn’t work.
    so, can you please suggest, the better way to do this.
    thanks and regards,
    Kaushik

    I,
    Please take  a look at  BADI AC_DOCUMENT

  • Business Partner - Average Delay field

    Hi Everyone,
    There is a field titled "Average Delay" on the business partner master data screen on the payment terms tab.  I have been doing some research on how this field works as we've been asked to create a query to calculate a customer's DSO. 
    In my research I have found that this field is defined by the user and is used in the cash flow analysis.  The cash flow analysis is adjusted according to what the average delay is per customer. 
    Has anybody set anything up to automatically calculate the average delay for a customer?  Or must you calculate this outside of SAP first and then enter the delays into SAP on a regular basis? 
    It would be helpful and convenient if a formatted search could be used on the field to do the caculcations automatically.  Would this be possible and if so, how?
    Thank you in advance for your help.
    Amanda

    Hi Suda,
    I agree that it would be rather complex and could vary from person to person.
    For example, you asked if the delay should be calculated from the due date or in other words the amount in days it took the customer to pay after their due date.  In my case, I would want to see the number of days it took the customer to pay from the posting date.  I wouldn't take the due date into consideration at all.  Of course, our next customer may want something different and may request the calculation you brought up.
    However, because the number entered into this field affects the cash flow statement, we have to be very careful as to how we use it.  I've tried testing how this exactly affects the cash flow statement and haven't been able to quite follow it.  But for this post, I believe the best answer is to do the manual calculation and manual entry.
    Thank you,
    Amanda

  • [ASO Calculation] Weird behavior of calculation in ASO

    Hi,
    I have a strange scenario in one of ASO  cube (in 11.1.2.3 ) where calculation script (highlighted in orange below) written and run with POV set for all time periods results in expected values only for one period and for the rest results are not seen (we see only #MISSING). We have similar logic for other calculation and it seems to have worked fine. I am puzzled now as to why the calculation (with similar logic) work for all periods in one script and doesnt in other script. What is preventing results to be seen across all periods ? We have tried
    (a) slice merge - NO CHANGE, (b) clear partial data > re-run calc >  slice merge - NO CHANGE. We have run out of options now and have no clue as to what is triggering this strange behavior in ASO ? Is this a bug ?
    =========================================================================================================================
    Here even-though we have POV set for all periods, the result is only seen on Oct-15 and not for other periods.When we do manual calculation in Excel, we see result but from the cube we get only #Missing.
    CALCULATION RESULTING IN PARTIAL RESULT:
         [L0_S/S COS per Day] := (([AC_ZZ5030],[DP_Z3100]) + ([AC_ZZ5020],[DP_Z3100]) - ([AC_500510],[DP_Z3100]) - ([AC_500520],[DP_Z3100])) / ([AC_991023],[DP_Z3100]);
    MAXL RESULTING IN PARTIAL RESULT:
    execute calculation on database "WAG_FBI"."WAG_FBI" with
    local script_file "/u01/app/test/fmw/instances/instance1/Essbase/essbaseserver1/app/WAG_FBI/WAG_FBI/SS_DOS.csc"
    POV "Crossjoin({[Loaded]},
      Crossjoin({[Actual]},
      Crossjoin ([Time].Levels(0).Members,
      Crossjoin({[DP_15125]},
      Crossjoin([LOB].Levels(0).Members,
      Crossjoin([LE].Levels(0).Members,
      [Location].Levels(0).Members))))))"
    SourceRegion "CrossJoin({[AC_ZZ5030],[AC_ZZ5020],[AC_500510],[AC_500520],[AC_991023]},{[DP_Z3100]})" ;
    =========================================================================================================================
    Here we have same POV  and similar calculation logic (only change being in the denominator and the account where result should be stored) , the result is seen across all periods.
    CALCULATION WHERE COMPLETE RESULT IS SEEN:
    [L0_Rx COS per Day] := (([AC_ZZ5030],[DP_10010]) + ([AC_ZZ5020],[DP_10010]) - ([AC_500510],[DP_10010]) - ([AC_500520],[DP_10010])) / ([AC_991012],[DP_10010]);
    MAXL WHERE COMPLETE RESULT IS SEEN:
    execute calculation on database "WAG_FBI"."WAG_FBI" with
    local script_file "/u01/app/test/fmw/instances/instance1/Essbase/essbaseserver1/app/WAG_FBI/WAG_FBI/RX_DOS.csc"
    POV "Crossjoin({[Loaded]},
      Crossjoin({[Actual]},
      Crossjoin ([Time].Levels(0).Members,
      Crossjoin({[DP_10010]},
      Crossjoin([LOB].Levels(0).Members,
      Crossjoin([LE].Levels(0).Members,
      [Location].Levels(0).Members))))))"
    SourceRegion "CrossJoin({[AC_ZZ5030],[AC_ZZ5020],[AC_500510],[AC_500520],[AC_991012]},{[DP_10010]})" ;
    =========================================================================================================================
    Regards,
    Sathish

    I have no idea what the cause of your problem is, but a suggestion for a test...
    Create a member (e.g. 'Calc L0_S/S COS per Day') in the same dimension as [L0_S/S COS per Day] (assuming this a dynamic dimension), assign the formula to it (instead of placing it in the script) then make your script copy from that member to the target.
    I felt sure I had seen a defect that related to partial ASO allocation results but I can't find it now, so perhaps I was confused.

  • Tax Rate Calculation

    Hello Experts
    I have a Tax combination BED+VAT contains the following tax codes
    BED = 16%
    E Cess = 2% (on BED)
    HS Cess = 1% (on BED)
    VAT = 4% (on (BEDE CessHS cess) )
    when manually calculated the  total tax percentage is  21.1392%
    where as in B1 under the tax code it shows Tax Rate as 23 % (1621+4)
    Is there any possible way to get the correct Tax Rate in Business One 8.8 .
    Regards
    Arun

    Hi Arun,
    Set formulation as follow -
    1. Create Formula for BED - 
         BED_BaseAmt = Total
         BED_TaxAmt=BED_BaseAmt*BED_Rate
    2. Create Formula for eCess -
         Cess_BaseAmt=BED_TaxAmt
         Cess_TaxAmt=Cess_BaseAmt*Cess_Rate
    3. Create Create for formula for ShCess-
         Shcess_TaxAmt=BED_TaxAmt*Shcess_Rate
         Shcess_BaseAmt=Shcess_TaxAmt
    4. Create Vat Formula for Vat -
         BaseAmt=TotalBED_TaxAmtCess_TaxAmt+Shcess_TaxAmt
         TaxAmt=BaseAmt*Rate
    5. Create Tax Combination as BED+VAT4  - select tax types BED,eCess ,ShCess and vat then select formula codes as above you defined accordingly.
    Thanks
    Sachin

  • Formulas aren't calculating immediately

    I have created my first form and everything seems to be working okay except for one of my formulas.  I have essentially created a sales order and need it to calculate the subtotal, apply a user-supplied discount and then calculate tax and come up with an "out the door" price.  This isn't happening. 
    Anyone have any tips?

    You didn't really say what is going wrong exactly, but if it's a "delay" in calculation then it's most likely a problem with the field calculation order (not the same as the tab order), which can be edited in Form Edit mode, under Other Tasks - Set Field Calculation Order.

  • 7.2 delay compensation

    Have 7.2 delay compensation in TDM?

    it passes delay to Midi clock and MTC -to midi regions : NO!!! But u can just enter a delay manually - like in logic only more precise....
    however if u monitor midi internally in protools it utilizes ADC

  • Reg:using dynamic calc in calculation script

    Can we use a dyanmic calc member of sparse dimension in a calculation script. In which situations we use the intelligent calculation and in which situations we will not use intelligent calculation.

    Generally you turn off intelligent calc for any manual calculation scripts you want to run. Intelligent calculation means that "If you then load a subset of data, on subsequent calculations, Essbase calculates only the data blocks that have not been calculated and the calculated blocks that require recalculation because of new data".
    Taken straight from: http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E12825_01/epm.111/esb_dbag/dcaoptic.htm

  • Calculating years,months & days

    Hi,
    i have to calculate the time duration in years,months and days between contract_start_date and contract_end_date
    eg: Contract_Start_Date = '17-nov-2006' and Contract_End_Date = '21-jan-2008'

    Rehman wrote:
    Hi,
    i have to calculate the time duration in years,months and days between contract_start_date and contract_end_date
    eg: Contract_Start_Date = '17-nov-2006' and Contract_End_Date = '21-jan-2008'It's not the simplest of things to work out.
    If you use the intervals it will, like any other calculation, struggle with the fact that there are different number of days in the month and leap years to take account of.
    Whilst it's simple enough to determine how many whole years have passed and how many months difference there is, the moment you start to take account of the days you become stuck because days in conjunction with months cause the day calculation to be a little more indeterminate...
    SQL> ed
    Wrote file afiedt.buf
      1  with t as (select to_date('17-nov-2006','dd-mon-yyyy') as c_start_date, to_date('21-jan-2008','dd-mon-yyyy') as c_end_date from dual union all
      2             select to_date('21-nov-2006','dd-mon-yyyy'), to_date('17-feb-2008','dd-mon-yyyy') from dual union all
      3             select to_date('21-jun-2006','dd-mon-yyyy'), to_date('17-jul-2008','dd-mon-yyyy') from dual
      4             )
      5  -- end of test data
      6  select c_start_date, c_end_date,
      7         to_char(c_end_date,'YYYY')-to_char(c_start_date,'YYYY')
      8        -(case when to_date(to_char(c_end_date,'DD-MM')||'-1900','DD-MM-YYYY') <
      9                    to_date(to_char(c_start_date,'DD-MM')||'-1900','DD-MM-YYYY') then 1 else 0 end) as years_between
    10        ,case when to_date(to_char(c_end_date,'DD-MM')||'-1900','DD-MM-YYYY') <
    11                    to_date(to_char(c_start_date,'DD-MM')||'-1900','DD-MM-YYYY') then
    12                    12+(to_char(c_end_date,'MM')-to_char(c_start_date,'MM'))
    13         else (to_char(c_end_date,'MM')-to_char(c_start_date,'MM'))
    14         end -
    15        (case when to_date(to_char(c_end_date,'DD')||'-01-1900','DD-MM-YYYY') <
    16                   to_date(to_char(c_start_date,'DD')||'-01-1900','DD-MM-YYYY') then 1 else 0 end)
    17         as months_between
    18        ,case when to_date(to_char(c_end_date,'DD')||'-01-1900','DD-MM-YYYY') >
    19                   to_date(to_char(c_start_date,'DD')||'-01-1900','DD-MM-YYYY') then
    20              (to_char(c_end_date,'DD')-to_char(c_start_date,'DD'))
    21         else 31-(to_char(c_start_date,'DD')-to_char(c_end_date,'DD'))
    22         end as days_between_approx
    23        ,(c_end_date-c_start_date) year(4) to month as interval_yyyy_mm
    24* from t
    SQL> /
    C_START_D C_END_DAT YEARS_BETWEEN MONTHS_BETWEEN DAYS_BETWEEN_APPROX INTERVAL_YYYY_MM
    17-NOV-06 21-JAN-08             1              2                   4 +0001-02
    21-NOV-06 17-FEB-08             1              2                  27 +0001-03
    21-JUN-06 17-JUL-08             2              0                  27 +0002-01
    SQL>This example shows that a manual calculation can determine the number of years and months ok, but the days have to be approximated; and the interval answer isn't giving the same result for the months as the manual calculation because it can't take account of the days at the same time.

  • Calculated Key-Figure based on Cumulated Key-Figure

    Hi BW-Community,
    I have problems defining a ckf based on a key-figure wich are marked as cumulated. I know this topic was discussed before
    but I did not find a acceptable solution yet.
    Here is my example (as it should be)
    *** KF1     KF2   CKF3 (KF1 % KF2)
    2            2           100%      
    4            2           200%
    6            2           300%
    And this is the Output from BW
    *** KF1    KF2   CKF3 (KF1 % KF2)
    2            2           100%      
    4            2           100%
    6            2           100%
    BW uses the not cumulated keyfigure-value instead of the cumulated value,
    I tried several things:
    1.) Use the class CL_RSR_WWW_MODIFY_TAB and redefine the method data_cell to do a manual calculation on the results. This works but
    it is very inflexible and restricted on WEb Template also the Excel Integration do not work properly.
    2.) Mark the CKF also as cumulated but this don't work either.
    My customer uses such calculation on almost every Query and Report so I need a practicable solution.
    I think the best way to solve this is in the staginf prozess, but i did not find a solution yet.
    Does anybody know a workaround, solution? We will put to NW2004s soon is there any chance that this will work
    in this release?
    Thank you in advance
    Greetings
    Timo

    Hi
    Thank you for the replies.
    I create a new CKF without percentage funktion but it didn't work. Same result as described in the first post.
    Even if i put only KF1 in a new CKF (e.g.CKF2  =KF1) the uncumuated value is shouwm
    Example:
    *** KF1    CKF2
    2           2 
    4           2
    6           2
    @ Structure
    I know that using structure is possible. But we cannot use structures, because we have a dynamic amount of characteristic-values (e.g. 0calday)

  • "Weird" result in MOSFET Capacitance calculation.

    Hi everyone,
    I have a problem with the simulation result for calculating N-CH Mosfet
    capacitance (Cgs, Cgd, and Cdb).  
    In this simulation I tried to verify my manual calculation with the Spice
    result using Multsim 11.0. But, the result in Multism simulation is quit
    different either from the manual calculation or from Pspice/Hspice simulation.
    Manual Calculation:
    Multisim Simulation:
    Setting Parameters in Multisim:
    .DC from Multisim
    >DC from PSPICE
    From those results, it seems that Pspice gave a close value to the theoretical MOSFET calculation here.  And I got messy result in Multisim.
    Can somebody help me solving this problem?..is Multisim not as powerful as other spice software? or I just messed up with the parameters setting form Multisim and ended with the wrong answer?

    You need to post this on the Multisim forum.
    Alan

  • Inaccurate Pricing Calculation

    Hi All,
    I have set Master Price for material A as USD 337 per Car. One CAR includes 12 EA.
    I made a sales order including 5 EA of this material A.
    With manually calculation, the condition value of these 5 EA material A should be  USD 140.42.
    However, SAP shows it as USD 140.53.
    Can anyone tell me what is the problem causes the Inaccurate Pricing Calculation?
    Cheers,
    Simon.

    HI,
    This is more to do with Rounding difference. Do you have Diff condition in your pricing procedure.
    Read SAP note 1158475. This should solve your problem.
    Aslo check if the Rounding tick is activated in contion type in case of group condition
    Thanks,
    Mauryan.
    Edit
    Edited by: Mauryan on Apr 29, 2011 9:28 AM

  • TDS Manual Caluation

    How to calculate each month TDS manually and upload the amount to sap  system . which will rewrite the /460 wage type.  I want to know whether itu2019s possible in SAP .
    Thanks

    Why do you want Manual calculation and upload every month.....
    You run the payroll in SAP and intially calculate TDS manually and check whether it is maching with SAP tax....if it is not matching with SAP then find out where is the problem...or you can maintain manually calculated amount in IT0015.
    For manual calculation and upload you have to create WTfor IT0015...check with Model WTs MVT0,MVT1 and MVT2.
    Check with rule INVT for the same and go through the documetation.
    Mohan

Maybe you are looking for