Delete 'Defective sessions' to make Table APQD free

Hi All,
We checked and found that We have one table APQD in our ECC 6.0 system which is taking 39.54 GB space.
We found OSS Note 36781 - Table APQD is very large which says to run report RSBDCREO.
We ran report RSBDCREO and it only deleted 10 entries out of 9.771.379 entries then we checked Note 18307 - Batch input
logs and reorganization which says report RSBDCREO deletes processed sessions (that is, sessions that have been processed successfully) and their logs from the system.
Only these sessions are deleted, but no 'Sessions still to be processed' or 'Defective sessions' and so on.
We have lot of defective sessions in our system and we need to delete them.
Please suggest the way to delete 'Defective sessions' also from table APQD.
Regads,
Shivam Mittal

Hello Shivam,
Please use program RSBDCTL6 in order to clean all Batch Inputs.
After first clean, you can replace RSBDCREO or leave as second step in your job.
SAP Note 970025 - Batch input RSBDCTL6 enhancement
Regards,
Jairo Pedroza

Similar Messages

Where can we find the deleted/ archived session details? ant table?

Hello Experts
where can we find the deleted/archived session details...
can any one confirm please is their any table is their?
Thanks

Hi Kalyan,
Go to SARA->object Name->Management for finding the archive session details.
You could check table ADMI_RUN and ADMI_FILES for the details.
Hope this helps,
Naveen

Dbms_datapump in PL/SQL- the file dump deleted after session disconnect

Hi all
I create test procedure to exp and imp table to dump file, it done but when I close session ( relogin to plsql developer to other schemas) the dump file is automatic deleted. how can to make dbms_datapump do not auto delete dump file when session disconnect.
declare
handle1 NUMBER;
handle2 number;
name1 VARCHAR2(30);
name2 VARCHAR2(30);
jobState user_datapump_jobs.state%TYPE;
begin
name1:='abc_tbl1'|| to_char(SYSDATE,'YYYYMMDDHH24MI')||'.dmp';
name2:='abc_tbl2'|| to_char(SYSDATE,'YYYYMMDDHH24MI')||'.dmp';
handle1 := dbms_datapump.open('EXPORT','TABLE');
dbms_datapump.add_file(handle1,name1,'DUMP');
dbms_datapump.metadata_filter(handle1,'SCHEMA_EXPR','IN (''ABC'')');
dbms_datapump.metadata_filter(handle1,'NAME_EXPR','IN (''abc_tbl1'')');
dbms_datapump.set_parallel(handle1,4);
dbms_datapump.start_job(handle1,0);
dbms_datapump.detach(handle1);
end;
thank

Thank for your help, I fixed this one, just change code like this :)
declare
handle1 NUMBER;
handle2 number;
name1 VARCHAR2(30);
name2 VARCHAR2(30);
jobState user_datapump_jobs.state%TYPE;
r_stat1 VARCHAR2(1);
r_stat2 VARCHAR2(1);
date1 DATE;
date2 DATE;
fcc_date DATE;
begin
--take name of dump
name1:='abc_tbl1'|| to_char(SYSDATE,'YYYYMMDDHH24MI')||'.dmp';
name2:='abc_tbl2'|| to_char(SYSDATE,'YYYYMMDDHH24MI')||'.dmp';
---take the date
handle1 := dbms_datapump.open('EXPORT','TABLE');
dbms_datapump.add_file(handle1,'lampp.log','DUMP',NULL,dbms_datapump.ku$_file_type_log_file);
dbms_datapump.add_file(handle1,name1,'DUMP');
dbms_datapump.metadata_filter(handle1,'SCHEMA_EXPR','IN (''ABC'')');
dbms_datapump.metadata_filter(handle1,'NAME_EXPR','IN (''ABC_TBL1'')'); --- input with upper character
dbms_datapump.set_parallel(handle1,4);
dbms_datapump.start_job(handle1,0,0);
dbms_datapump.wait_for_job(handle1, jobState);
dbms_datapump.detach(handle1);
end;

Deleted BDC sessions

Howdy!
I wanna be able to view deleted BDC sessions is there a way to do this?
Or are they gone forever when I can't no longer seem em from SM35???????
Also is there any good documentation on how the underlying table relations in SAP work and how to approach programming and a really good guide for beginners?
Thanks y'all

Hi Steve
Sorry but I think you've lost deleted BDC sessions.
I couldn't figure out what you mean by underlying table relations in SAP but there are some ways to gather information about ABAP programming. It is obvious that hands-on working is a must. Here are some ways that I can recommend:
1. "ABAP Objects The Official Reference"
A comprehensive guide to all ABAP language elements
by Horst Keller & Joachim Jacobitz
--> You can find more info from http://www.sap-press.com/H958.html
--> The miniWAS demo system is a good opportunity for hands-on experience
--> The older version "ABAP Objects: Introduction to Programming SAP Applications"
by Horst Keller, Sascha Kruger may also be OK
2. "Sams Teach Yourself ABAP/4 in 21 Days" by Ken Greenwood
--> This may be found from http://www.amazon.com and has a simpler aspect then the book above
3. SAP Educations offered by SAP Education Partners
--> There are various classes. There are some supplementary documents and of course hands-on experience
3. SAP online help: http://help.sap.com
4. There are various sites on the internet about ABAP programming, just make a search and look around.
Regards...
*--Serdar

Delete operation is not working to delete selected row from ADF table

Hi All,
We are working on jdev 11.1.1.5.3. We have one ADF table as shown below. My requirement is to delete a selected row from table, but it is deleting the first row only.
<af:table value="#{bindings.EventCalendarVO.collectionModel}" var="row"
rows="#{bindings.EventCalendarVO.rangeSize}"
emptyText="#{bindings.EventCalendarVO.viewable ? applcoreBundle.TABLE_EMPTY_TEXT_NO_ROWS_YET : applcoreBundle.TABLE_EMPTY_TEXT_ACCESS_DENIED}"
fetchSize="#{bindings.EventCalendarVO.rangeSize}"
rowBandingInterval="0"
selectedRowKeys="#{bindings.EventCalendarVO.collectionModel.selectedRow}"
selectionListener="#{bindings.EventCalendarVO.collectionModel.makeCurrent}"
rowSelection="single" id="t2" partialTriggers="::ctb1 ::ctb3"
>
To perform delete operation i have one delete button.
<af:commandToolbarButton
text="Delete"
disabled="#{!bindings.Delete.enabled}"
id="ctb3" accessKey="d"
actionListener="#{AddNewEventBean. *deleteCurrentRow* }"/>
As normal delete operation is not working i am using programatic approach from bean method. This approach works with jdev 11.1.1.5.0 but fails on ver 11.1.1.5.3
public void deleteCurrentRow (ActionEvent actionEvent) *{* DCBindingContainer bindings =
(DCBindingContainer)BindingContext.getCurrent().getCurrentBindingsEntry();
DCIteratorBinding dcItteratorBindings =
bindings.findIteratorBinding("EventCalendarVOIterator");
// Get an object representing the table and what may be selected within it
ViewObject eventCalVO = dcItteratorBindings.getViewObject();
// Remove selected row
eventCalVO.removeCurrentRow();
it is removing first row from table still. Main problem is not giving the selected row as current row. Any one point out where is the mistake?
We have tried the below code as well in deleteCurrentRow() method
RowKeySet rowKeySet = (RowKeySet)this.getT1().getSelectedRowKeys();
CollectionModel cm = (CollectionModel)this.getT1().ggetValue();
for (Object facesTreeRowKey : rowKeySet) {
cm.setRowKey(facesTreeRowKey);
JUCtrlHierNodeBinding rowData = (JUCtrlHierNodeBinding)cm.getRowData();
rowData.getRow().remove();
The same behavior still.
Thanks in advance.
Rechin
Edited by: 900997 on Mar 7, 2012 3:56 AM
Edited by: 900997 on Mar 7, 2012 4:01 AM
Edited by: 900997 on Mar 7, 2012 4:03 AM

JDev 11.1.1.5.3 sounds like you are using oracle apps as this not a normal jdev version.
as it works in 11.1.1.5.0 you probably hit a bug which you should file with support.oracle.com...
Somehow you get the first row instead of the current row (i guess). You should debug your code and make sure you get the current selected row in your bean code and not the first row.
This might be a problem with the bean scope too. Do you have the button (or table) inside a region? Wich scope does the bean have?
Anyway you can try to remove the iterator row you get
public void deleteCurrentRow (ActionEvent actionEvent) { DCBindingContainer bindings =
(DCBindingContainer)BindingContext.getCurrent().getCurrentBindingsEntry();
DCIteratorBinding dcItteratorBindings =
bindings.findIteratorBinding("EventCalendarVOIterator");
dcItteratorBindings.removeCurrentRow();Timo

Table APQD its size is 64GB in Ecc 6.0

Hi expert,
we are using ECC 6.0 with oracle 10g.
in my ecc 6.0 a table APQD its size is 64GB.
how can i remove the data.if i remove the session in sm35 then its size will reduce??
Regards,

Hi,
Please read following SAP note and related notes.
Note 36781 - Table APQD is very large
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Varun

How to restrict the user(Schema) from deleting the data from a table

Hi All,
I have scenario here.
I want to know how to restrict a user(Schema) from deleting the values from a table created in the same schema.
Below is the example.
I have created a table employee in abc schema which has two values.
EMPLOYEE
ABC
XYZ
In the above scenario the abc user can only fire select query on the EMPLOYEE table.
SELECT * FROM EMPLOYEE;
He should not be able to use any other DML commands on that table.
If he uses then Insufficient privileges error should be thrown.
Can anyone please help me out on this.

Hi,
kumar0828 wrote:
Hi Frank,
Thanks for the reply.
Can you please elaborate on how to add policies for a table for just firing a select DML statement on table.See the SQL Packages and Types manual first. It has examples. You can also search the web for examples. This is sometimes called "Virtual Private Database" or VPD.
If you have problems, post a specific question here. Include CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements to create a table as it exists before the policies go into effect, the PL/SQL code to create the policies, and additonal DML statements that will be affected by the policies. Show what the table should contain after each of those DML statements.
Always say which version of Oracle you're using. Confirm that you have Enterprise Edition.
See the forum FAQ {message:id=9360002}
The basic idea behind row-level security is that it generates a string that is automatically added to SELECT and/or DML statement WHERE clauses. For example, if user ABC is only allowed to query a table on Sunday, then you might write a function that returns the string
USER != 'ABC'
OR      TO_CHAR (SYSDATE, 'DY', 'NLS_DATE_LANGUAGE=ENGLISH') = 'SUN'So whenever any user says
SELECT *
FROM    table_x
;what actually runs is:
SELECT *
FROM    table_x
WHERE   USER != 'ABC'
OR      TO_CHAR (SYSDATE, 'DY', 'NLS_DATE_LANGUAGE=ENGLISH') = 'SUN'
;If you want to prevent any user from deleting rows, then the policy function can return just this string
0 = 1Then, if somone says
DELETE employee
;what actually gets run is
DELETE employee
WHERE   0 = 1
;No error will be raised, but no rows will be deleted.
Once again, it would be simpler, more efficient, more robust and easier to maintain if you just created the table in a different schema, and not give DELETE privileges.
Edited by: Frank Kulash on Nov 2, 2012 10:26 AM
I just saw the previous response, which makes some additional good points (e.g., a user can always TRUNCATE his own tables). ALso, if user ABC applies a security policy to the table, then user ABC can also remove the policy, so if you really want to prevent user ABC from deleting rows, no matter how hard the user tries, then you need to create the policies in a different schema. If you're creating things in a different schema, then you might as well create the table in a different schema.

Deleting a row from a table containing CLOB as one of the columns

When i delete a row from a table which contains a CLOB (internal clob) i.e. CLOB or BLOB column, Will the CLOB data will also be deleted ? I understand that what exactly stored in the CLOB column is the clob locator which points to the actual data.
So, when I delete this row, the clob locator will be deleted, but will the actual data what this locator is pointing to is also deleted ??? if not what is the process to delete the data the locator is pointing to when the row containing the locator is deleted ? If this is not happening then the actual data might become an orphan data which nobody has access to, will automatic garbage cleaning occurs on a frequent intravels to delete unaddressed data residing on the database server ?
Thanks in advance for the help, can email me at [email protected] alternatively.
Regards,
Srinivasa C.

Michael,
Thanks very much for your inputs, here are the results i got when i tried the way you explained in your answer, the TRUNCATE command made the actual size back to normal, but the delete is not the same, so, how can i delete the data that a particular clob locator may point to ?
truncate would delete all the rows of the table, which might not serve my purpose, i would like to delete a row and also it's associated clob data from the database! is there anyway to do this ?
is there any limitation on the ool_sample size? i am basically a c++ programmer, i am looking for some function like FREE which would free the allocated memory to the clob once the locator is deleted.
your help is greatly appreciated - Thanks!
:-) Srini.
==========================
My Results:
==========================
SQL> create table sample (
2 id integer primary key,
3 the_data CLOB default empty_clob() )
4 lob (the_data) store as ool_sample;
Table created.
SQL> select segment_name, round(sum(bytes)/1024, 2) || 'K' as sotrage_consumed
2 from user_segments
3 where segment_name in ('SAMPLE', 'OOL_SAMPLE')
4 group by segment_name;
SEGMENT_NAME
SOTRAGE_CONSUMED
OOL_SAMPLE
20K
SAMPLE
10K
SQL> select count(*) from sample;
COUNT(*)
0
SQL> begin
2 for i in 1..1000
3 loop
4 insert into sample values (i, RPAD('some data', 4000) );
5 end loop;
6 end;
7 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> select segment_name, round(sum(bytes)/1024, 2) || 'K' as sotrage_consumed
2 from user_segments
3 where segment_name in ('SAMPLE', 'OOL_SAMPLE')
4 group by segment_name;
SEGMENT_NAME
SOTRAGE_CONSUMED
OOL_SAMPLE
6420K
SAMPLE
70K
SQL> delete sample;
1000 rows deleted.
SQL> select segment_name, round(sum(bytes)/1024, 2) || 'K' as sotrage_consumed
2 from user_segments
3 where segment_name in ('SAMPLE', 'OOL_SAMPLE')
4 group by segment_name;
SEGMENT_NAME
SOTRAGE_CONSUMED
OOL_SAMPLE
6420K
SAMPLE
70K
SQL> commit;
Commit complete.
SQL> select segment_name, round(sum(bytes)/1024, 2) || 'K' as sotrage_consumed
2 from user_segments
3 where segment_name in ('SAMPLE', 'OOL_SAMPLE')
4 group by segment_name;
SEGMENT_NAME
SOTRAGE_CONSUMED
OOL_SAMPLE
6420K
SAMPLE
70K
SQL> begin
2 for i in 1..1000
3 loop
4 insert into sample values (i, rpad('some data', 4000));
5 end loop;
6 end;
7 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> select segment_name, round(sum(bytes)/1024, 2) || 'K' as sotrage_consumed
2 from user_segments
3 where segment_name in ('SAMPLE', 'OOL_SAMPLE')
4 group by segment_name;
SEGMENT_NAME
SOTRAGE_CONSUMED
OOL_SAMPLE
9616K
SAMPLE
70K
SQL> truncate table sample;
Table truncated.
SQL> select segment_name, round(sum(bytes)/1024, 2) || 'K' as sotrage_consumed
2 from user_segments
3 where segment_name in ('SAMPLE', 'OOL_SAMPLE')
4 group by segment_name;
SEGMENT_NAME
SOTRAGE_CONSUMED
OOL_SAMPLE
20K
SAMPLE
10K

How to find out who made inserts/updates/deletes made to a SQL Table

I want to know WHO MAKES INSERTS/UPDATES/DELETES TO a particular SQL Table. Bascially I want to AUDIT ANY Edites made to a SQL 2008 TABLE. I need info such as WHO AMDE THE Updates i.e. the user first/lastname, When update was made, what row was updated etc...How
can I do that with SQL 2008?

One way to achieve that would be to use triggers to detect when a change is made to the table, and then insert a record into another table/database detailing what changed and who by.
You'd need three triggers, one for insert, update and delete respectively, and for each of those you use the "inserted" and "deleted" tables (system tables maintained by SQL) to retrieve what has been done. To retrieve who made the change you can query IDENT_CURRENT
which returns the last identity value for a specific table.
See :
Triggers -
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-gb/library/ms189799(v=sql.100).aspx
Inserted & deleted tables -
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms191300(v=sql.100).aspx
INDENT_CURRENT -
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms175098(v=sql.100).aspx
There may be better / more up to date ways to do this, but I've used this method successfully in the past, albeit a long time ago (on a SQL 2000 box I think!).

I am receiving a notification that says that I am running out of storage space. I backed up time mating to an external hard drive. Can I delete some files to make room?

I am receiving notifications that I am running out of storage space. I backed up my mac book using an external and time machine. Can I delete some files to make room?
If so,
When I want to restore from my time machine, can I pick and choose, say certain songs, photos or documents?

About TM "Backup Drive is Full"
Alert TM only deletes older files if they have been deleted from the source and when TM needs space on the backup drive for a new incremental backup. Time Machine "thins" it's backups; hourly backups over 24 hours old, except the first of the day; those "daily" backups over 30 days old, except the first of the week. The weeklies are kept as long as there's room.
So, how long a backup file remains depends on how long it was on your Mac before being deleted, assuming you do at least one backup per day. If it was there for at least 24 hours, it will be kept for at least a month. If it was there for at least a week, it will be kept as long as there's room.
Note, that on a Time Capsule the sparsebundle grows in size as needed, but doesn't shrink. Thus, from the user's view of the TC it appears that no space has been freed, although there may be space in the sparsebundle.
Once TM has found it cannot free up enough space for a new backup it reports the disk is full. You can either erase the backup drive and start your backups anew or replace the drive with a larger drive. You can also use the Time Machine application to selectively remove files, but that may be ineffective if you have to free up GBs of space.

BPM question - Delete all entries in a table and Insert data

Hello,
I'm new to PI BPM and have this scenario to implement.
I'm supposed to delete all entries in a table and then insert data to the same table.
Is BPM necessary? If it is, what is the best practice to implement my scenario?
I want to make sure that all entries were successfully deleted before insert data.
How do I check if all entries in the table were deleted successfully before
initiating insert.
Thank you.
-Won

Hi Won,
Yes, this is possible without BPM.
You have to create 2 separate mappings, each for deleting & inserting the records.
You will have 2 different Interface mappings as well.
But in ID, create a single interface determination.
In that, configure Deletion interface mapping first and in the second row, configure Insertion interface mapping.
Please make sure that the parameter 'Mainain Order At runtime' is checked in interface determination.
-Supriya.

Delete a user from a table whose name is a foreign key in other tables

Dear All;
I am trying to figure out an easy way to do this. I just recently took someone application who utilized 500 tables. I am trying to delete a user from a table called member_table. However, I am having problems doing so because the user name is a foreign key in other tables which has a relationship with this member_table. I really can't naviagte through all 500 different tables and start deleting the user from each table . hence, I would like to figure out a way to delete the user from the member_table without getting the error message
ORA - 02292 "Integrity Constraint (....) violated child record found

Unless you want to find and re-create all of the FK's that point to that field so you can make them ON DELETE CASCADE (note it is the FK not the PK that has that attribute), you will need to either delete that member id from each of the child tables individually or update each one individually to either null or some valid value in member_table before you can delete the id from member_table.
You can find all of the tables, and the corresponding column_name that have an FK relationship to memeber_table with the following:
SELECT c.table_name, col.column_name
FROM user_constraints c, user_cons_columns col
WHERE c.constraint_name = col.constraint_name and
      c.r_constraint_name = (SELECT constraint_name
                             FROM user_constraints
                             WHERE table_name = 'MEMBER_TABLE' and
                                   constraint_type = 'P') and
     c.constraint_type = 'R';If there are a lot of these, you could use something similar to generate the set of delete/update statements that would be needed.
John

Sending email after deleting the records in a table

Hi
I am deleting the records in a table. After deleting the records,
i want to send an email to another person. I am planning to follow this steps.
1. Create a trigger on the table(AFTER DELETE ON table FOR EACH ROW)
to copy the deleted records to temporary table.
2. Read the temporary table and send an email.
Is there any other way we can do with out creating temporary table ?.
Govind

I don't know what you plan to use to send the mail but here's a solution that would work.
-- Create a send mail procedure
create or replace procedure send_mail (
sender      IN VARCHAR2,
recipient   IN VARCHAR2,
message     IN VARCHAR2)
IS
mailhost VARCHAR2(30) := 'localhost';
mail_conn utl_smtp.connection;
BEGIN
mail_conn := utl_smtp.open_connection(mailhost, 25);
utl_smtp.helo(mail_conn, mailhost);
utl_smtp.mail(mail_conn, sender);
utl_smtp.rcpt(mail_conn, recipient);
utl_smtp.data(mail_conn, message);
utl_smtp.quit(mail_conn);
END;
/-- Create the trigger to email deleted rows
create or replace trigger email_del_rows
after delete on <table>
for each row
declare
msg varchar2(2000);
begin
msg := 'COL1 COL2 COMPANY NAME DATE'||chr(10);
msg := msg||:old.col1||'    '||:old.col2||'    '||:old.company_name||'       '||:old_date|| chr(10);
msg := msg||'END OF FILE';
send_mail('SENDER','[email protected]',msg);
end;
/You can make it look pretty but you get the basic idea.

Delete all record in a table, the insert speed is not change.

I have an empty table, and i insert a record need 100ms,
when this table has 40,0000 record, i insert a record need 1s, this is ok, because i need do a compare based an index before insert a record, so more record, need more time.
The problem is when i delete all record in this table, the insert time is still 1s, not reduce to 100ms.Why?

Hello,
Read through this portion of oracle documentation
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14220/logical.htm#CNCPT004
The reason is still taking 1s, because when you inserted 400K record because HWM (The high water mark is the boundary between used and unused space in a segment.) moved up. And when you deleted all the records your HWM still at the same marker and didn't get to reset to 0. So when you insert 1 record it lookings for free space and after finding (generally a regular inserts got 6 steps it inserts data). If you truncate your table you and try it again it will be faster as your HWM is reset to 0.
Regards

Delete all rows in a table

I have read two articles how to use sql adapter with delete.
http://btsguru.blogspot.se/2011/10/wcf-sql-adapter-table-operations.html
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/29146.biztalk-server-2013-crud-operation-with-wcf-sql-adapter-and-correlation.aspx?wa=wsignin1.0
Is it a way to delete all rows in a table?
I have tried to send <ns0:Rows>*</ns0:Rows> with no luck.
Challan

I'm not expert in Biztalk but one of the options to call stored procedure that contains the delete script:
http://geekswithblogs.net/StuartBrierley/archive/2011/10/19/biztalk-server-2010---using-the-wcf-sql-adapter-to-make.aspx
Sql Delete all rows from table Script:
DELETE FROM table_name;
or
TRUNCATE TABLE mytable;
Trucnate vs Delete:
http://www.mssqltips.com/sqlservertip/1080/deleting-data-in-sql-server-with-truncate-vs-delete-commands/
Fouad Roumieh

Delete 'Defective sessions' to make Table APQD free

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for