Delivery problem in case of Individual PO's

Hi Experts,
I have a issue in the delivery creation in case of Individual PO's sales orders(Back orders), where after creation of sales ordedrs PR and PO is created, but as the deliveries are created thru Jobs for these sales orders allso there are deliverries created but with the 0 quantity . and it shows open quantity 1,
please guide what could be reasons for the for creating delivries with out stock available .
Thanks

Are you sure its IPO(BANC, TAB) ?
Because we need to receive stock from vendor, then we do migo.
So stock is maintained in inventory.
Unless it is Third party(BANS, TAS) where just material is extended to sales area and no stock is required for carrying forward with whole process.
Regards
Pavan Kumar

Similar Messages

Planned Delivery time in case of Scheduling Agreement

Hi All,
Does system consider the planned delivery time in case of Scheduling Agreement for Vendor like in normal Purchase order and requisition?
I am doing the MRP run, but system is taken planned delivery time into consideration. I have one material that is Inhouse produced material for plant X and Y Plant needs this material for further making of a finished goods.
Y plant have scheduling agreement for STO from plant X. After MRP Run required Delivery date in plant X for Material is same as plant Y. but from Plant X to Y, it take 4 days to reach. So Ideally in Plant X this delivery date should be less than 4 days as plant Y.
Please look into the issue and reply if you have some answers.
Thanks
Pavan

Hope you have maintained different Planned Delivery times in plant X and Plant Y as per your requirement. For procurement in Plant Y the system would consider the planned delievry time maintained in Plant Y. If you want in-house production time to be considered with Basis date sheduling during MRP run in PLant X then enter the in-house production time approprietely. Else if ou want to consider the exact routing times then consider Lead time scheduling in plant X.
If the above are maintained properly then you should get the desired result.
Regards
Ramanujan

Over Delivery Problem

Hi Friends
In order to avoid over delivery , in 0VLP , we made configuration setting for delivery item category .(Check overdelivery B Situation rejected with an error).
In scheduling agreement , there are 5 line items , quantity for each line item is 10 .
We created the delivery for this scheduling agreement and we changed the quantity from 10 to 11 in delivery . system throws error that u201Cdelivery quantity is greater than target quantityu201D.
But , I deleted one line item in delivery and increased quantity for other line items in delivery . System is not throwing any error , system is simply accepting over delivery .
It means if we delete one line item in delivery , my configuration setting for delivery item category to avoid over deliver wonu2019t work ? .
Some time user will have to delete some line items in delivery , that time this over delivery configuration setting wonu2019t work .
What should I do in this peculiar case , how can avoid over delivery in the case .My user is asking repeatedly .
Thanks In Advance

HI,
pls change the routine assigned in the delivery document functionality from 201 to 202 or 202 to 201for field ItemRequirement in ovlk tcode.
Regards,
kishore.
Edited by: kishore gopala on Jun 3, 2009 1:53 PM

TS3276 Internet Mail Delivery Problem

I have been getting "Internet Delivery Problem" on my email since midnight last night. All my email is coming through, accompanied by the above message, and all messages are going out. I don't see how to fix this. Any suggestions? I am on iCloud and went to Connection Doctor, and it said everything was fine!

Seems to not be system-wide. My husbands .mac account is behaving just fine.
Just curious, did anyone having problems also lose service a while back? If I understood what happened correctly, Apple had one big server center go down and I lost email for a couple of days but my husband didn't. So he's located on a different server than mine. Everyone seems randomly assigned since the outage was world-wide, and just those routed out of this one location lost service. Took them a while to acknowledge the issue, since it wasn't everyone. Curious if this is affecting the same people?

PO warning message: " ME 575 In case of individual batch valuation, use GR"

Hi,
During the creation of the PO the system prompt me the warning message: " ME 575 In case of individual batch valuation, use GR-based invoice verification".
I would like to block this message, we are not using the gr based invoicing.
I checked the customizing of "Define Attributes of System Messages" but I didn't find this message.Do you have any idea of how to block it?
Thanx and regards
Frank

Hi,
Firstly, just because a message is not in the config table does not mean that you can't control it. You can add missing entries and set the flags (don't worry about the warining message you will get when adding the message (remember to use 00 for the version number).
BUT, even if it is in the table or if you add it to the table sometimes the control is manually coded in the program.
So try adding the message and setting the flag but if it doesn't work then it is because the coding logic needs it and you may have to do as the message says.
My guiess if that you will have no choice but to use the "GR based IV" flag, the message is quite specific.
Steve B

Profit Center Problem in case of PGI after delivery

Hello All,
The problem is related to Stock Transfer Order (STO) between two plants which is as follows -
When a PO is raised for Material 1 the Profit Center is maintained in the material master in the Supplying Plant A but not maintained in the material master for Material 1 in the Recipient Plant B.After Delivery & PGI when posting is checked it is observed that In case of Supplying Plant A inventory a/c is getting credited reflecting the assigned profit center while in case of Recipient Plant B inventory a/c is getting debited but the profit center field remained blank.Is there any configuration possible to check/restrict the PGI posting when the profit center is not getting reflected in the recipient Plant without making the profit center field as 'mandatory' in the General Plant & Storage Data of the Material Master??
Please suggest at the earliest.
Thanks & Regards
Priyanka Mitra

Hello Sangram,
thank you for your fast reply.
It is not about the amounts. They are correct.
I got confused regarding the change of the profit center numbers on the level of the GR/IR.
KR
Thomas

Error message for over delivery quantity in case of batch split.

Hi All,
System is throwing error message if I try to to enter delivery quantity more than target quantity(order quantity) in case of standard process which is ok but in case of batch split when split line created (9000001 for line 10) and if go to item level in line item 900001 and enter delivery quantity more than target quantity system is giving only information message, still line item 10 is giving error message but line 9000001 giving only information message, user want this to be a error massege as well. Delivery item category for all the line items is same and status B is assigned to over delivery in item category. Is there any standard way of achieving this or do we need any modification, if yes then what user exit need to use.
I searched alot about this in last three days but found only one thread which is unanswered, please provide your valuable suggestions. If this problem is discussed already and solved please provide me the link to that thread as I could't find any.
Thanks,
Davinder

Hi
Still line item 10 is giving error message but line 9000001 giving only information message, user want this to be a error massage as well.
I think it you can possible to change the Information message as Warning message.
Please go to SE91 put the Message Class XX (Ex:V1) there And in No. field enter the message number (Ex: If message no V1293 enter the number as 293)
AND
go for
where used in then select only Program >ok then Program will come select the Program > double click, you will l find the message with the Description.
Now with help of ABAP with just comment on these both the messages. Afterwards you will get the Error message.
Hope this will helps you
Dasaradha

Excise problem in case of free items

Hello,
My user is having following issue.
Vendor has sent 3 items, out of which one is free sample. But on that excise has to b paid by us (which is approx 3000rs). So when user is trying 2 do GR, first 2 items dont hav any problem, but after checking ITEM OK tab in case of 3rd item(which is free sample), system shows run time error (A value does not fit in a calculation field.)
What may b the remedy for it. How 2 handle this?
Thanks.
Edited by: sapsarang on Oct 29, 2009 6:24 AM

First if you don't want to take credit of the free sample then follow the below procedure:
1. Do the GRN for all the three item and for the free item in the excise tab at the item level select the material as non cenvatable. Just remember to add base value of the item
2. If you want to capture the Part1 entry then just do the normal transaction and while posting the excise with J1IEX just remove the excise duties for the free item.
3. For paying the vendor the excise amount, just do subsequent debit in the MIRO and in the details tab add in the unplanned delivery cost the amount that you want to pay for the excise duties
Second case if you want to take credit of the duties:
1. Do the Normal GRN process, add the base value and excise values for the free item.
2. Post the Excise duites with J1iEX.
3. The with the account entry you can settle the excise payment
Hope this will help you
Enjoyyyyyyyyyyy
Akshit

Problem in case of or condition in where clause in case of leftouter joi.

hi
i am encountering a wierd problem.
in a select query if i have a left outer join and a or condition in where clause the order of condition in or matters and if i use a to_char problem is solved.
see query below
select * from custsupp left outer join Salesperson s on custsupp.sales_rep = s.id ,state a where (CS_FLAG='C' or CS_flag ='B') and custsupp.state = a.id
i have a single record in table custsupp with CS_FLAG ='B' the above does not return result. but if i move CS_FLAG='B' on left of or i.e
select * from custsupp left outer join Salesperson s on custsupp.sales_rep = s.id ,state a where (CS_FLAG='B' or CS_flag ='C') and custsupp.state = a.id
i get the rsult.
also if i remove left outer join and keep order of condition as it is i get result i.e
select * from custsupp ,state a where (CS_FLAG='C' or CS_flag ='B') and custsupp.state = a.id
also if i add a to_char to co,umns CS_FLAG i get the result.
select * from custsupp left outer join Salesperson s on custsupp.sales_rep = s.id ,state a where (to_char(CS_FLAG)='C' or to_char(CS_flag ='B')) and custsupp.state = a.id
why it is so?
CS_flag is of type nchar
Shreyas
Edited by: shreyasd on Jun 9, 2010 11:07 PM

First if you don't want to take credit of the free sample then follow the below procedure:
1. Do the GRN for all the three item and for the free item in the excise tab at the item level select the material as non cenvatable. Just remember to add base value of the item
2. If you want to capture the Part1 entry then just do the normal transaction and while posting the excise with J1IEX just remove the excise duties for the free item.
3. For paying the vendor the excise amount, just do subsequent debit in the MIRO and in the details tab add in the unplanned delivery cost the amount that you want to pay for the excise duties
Second case if you want to take credit of the duties:
1. Do the Normal GRN process, add the base value and excise values for the free item.
2. Post the Excise duites with J1iEX.
3. The with the account entry you can settle the excise payment
Hope this will help you
Enjoyyyyyyyyyyy
Akshit

TPVS Delivery problem

Hi
We have a problem in TPVS. Eventhough there is sufficient stock, delivery generations is not done, inspite giving message "delivery quantity is not fully available".
Can any one help in this?
Is this the problem with timing of the activities in R3 and APO.
Thanks in advance
Raj

Dear Raj,
You should take care of the following:
1). The order confirmation in R/3 should go and reduce the open stock on hand. And the manual orders should only be placed on the open stock available after subtracting all the open orders. Otherwise, once the order is confirmed in R/3, if there is a gap in running TP/VS, the deliveries are created on the depleted stock. This will not allow the creation of deliveries as the availability check will fail.
2). Check the material availability date and delivery date. If you can see the confirmed quantity corresponding to a line item in the schedule line, the delivery date minus the material availability date should be sufficient to transport the stock. Otherwise you need to maintain costs in such a way that late delivery costs are less than non delivery costs.
3). Check if the partial delivery case is allowed or not.
Regards,
Ankur

Delivery problems with Apple Store mailing address

Hello all,
I just sent the following letter to Apple; I'm just wondering if anyone else has experienced the same problem (missing mailing address lines) ?
Dear Apple,
I'd like to point out a potential problem in Apple Store mailing addresses.
During the past two years, I have now witnessed three (3) separate occasions, where the shipping address I give in my Apple Store order does not correctly end up in the actual mailing label.
The most recent case was today, when I (by sheer luck) received my Logic Pro 7.2 upgrade. The address I originally gave in my order was like this:
John Doe
My Home Street 123
MyCompany Ltd.
Helsinki, 00440
Finland
The first line is my name, the second line the street address, the third line my company, and the last line city and zip code.
However, the address that was in the envelope goes like this:
John Doe
MyCompany Ltd.
Helsinki, 00440
Finland
So the problem is, that the street address never made it to the mailing label. The envelope came addressed to me and my company; no street address at all. Fortunately the local post office knew where to find us.
I've seen this happen at least two times before, and it's always either the company name or the street address that's missing. They are not only missing from the mailing label in the envelope, they are also missing from the actual Apple Delivery Note that's inside the package. So it seems, that somewhere in your mailing process (at least for Finland) one of the address lines simply gets deleted.
I haven't (yet) lost anything valuable, but I'm getting really uncertain if I have the courage to order anything more valuable from your web store.
I hope you can fix this A.S.A.P. (or at least remove the extra address line from the order form, so that users won't put any crucial information into it).
G5 Mac OS X (10.4.4)

You may want to give Apple a call directly in Finland at (358) 0800 96162. Posts in this forum won't usually get forwarded to the correct people, as this is merely a user to user support forum.
Brian

Problem with CASE and Object tables.

Hi guys,
Have a problem which I am unable to understand how to solve.
I have the following object
create type obj_numeric_id_table as table of number(30);
create type obj_search_rec as object
( zones number(4),
locs obj_numeric_id_table
create type obj_search_tbl as table of obj_search_rec;
/Now this object Obj_search_tbl is being passed as an IN parameter to a procedure...actually the object has many more columns but the problem at hand is with the locs column.
The problem is - if I use the count for the locs column in an IF statement, then all works fine, but if I use it inside a CASE statement in the SELECT clause, it gives me an error.
create proc proc_1 (abc obj_search_tbl) .....
L_search obj_search_rec;
begin
L_search_rec := abc(1); -- for the moment there is only one record.
IF L_search_rec.locs.count() > 0 then -- this works perfectly
END IF;
select (case when L_search_rec.locs.count() > 0 then 1 end) from some_table;
-- now this case statement gives me the following error
"PL/SQL: ORA-00904: "L_SEARCH_REC"."LOCS"."COUNT": invalid identifier"Am I doing something wrong....am unable to understand why this is so...
Thanks,

Other possibility:
select count(t.column_value) from
(select obj_search_rec(1, obj_numeric_id_table(1,2)) obj_search_rec from dual) l,
table(l.obj_search_rec.locs) t;

GR problem in case of last year excise document

SAP GURUS, help required,
In our scenario what we do, we do excise invoice capture through j1iex, then migo(GR), then excise invoice post.
The problem is coming in goods receipt(migo-gr), if the excise document date(bill date on paper) that is captured through J1IEX is of last fiscal year then error comes that "excise invoice no... of vendor ... doesnt exist). this error only coming in case of last fiscal year's document date(during j1iex). plz help. thanks.

Hello,
Once an Excise invoice is captured, normally it should be posted in the same year. Please try to post in the same year. Otherwise this would create a mismatch between Part 1 and Part2 of RG 23 A/C registers.
Regards
>
Rahul Bika wrote:
> SAP GURUS, help required,
> In our scenario what we do, we do excise invoice capture through j1iex, then migo(GR), then excise invoice post.
> The problem is coming in goods receipt(migo-gr), if the excise document date(bill date on paper) that is captured through J1IEX is of last fiscal year then error comes that "excise invoice no... of vendor ... doesnt exist). this error only coming in case of last fiscal year's document date(during j1iex). plz help. thanks.

OCR and voting disks on ASM, problems in case of fail-over instances

Hi everybody
in case at your site you :
- have an 11.2 fail-over cluster using Grid Infrastructure (CRS, OCR, voting disks),
where you have yourself created additional CRS resources to handle single-node db instances,
their listener, their disks and so on (which are started only on one node at a time,
can fail from that node and restart to another);
- have put OCR and voting disks into an ASM diskgroup (as strongly suggested by Oracle);
then you might have problems (as we had) because you might:
- reach max number of diskgroups handled by an ASM instance (63 only, above which you get ORA-15068);
- experiment delays (especially in case of multipath), find fake CRS resources, etc.
whenever you dismount disks from one node and mount to another;
So (if both conditions are true) you might be interested in this story,
then please keep reading on for the boring details.
One step backward (I'll try to keep it simple).
Oracle Grid Infrastructure is mainly used by RAC db instances,
which means that any db you create usually has one instance started on each node,
and all instances access read / write the same disks from each node.
So, ASM instance on each node will mount diskgroups in Shared Mode,
because the same diskgroups are mounted also by other ASM instances on the other nodes.
ASM instances have a spfile parameter CLUSTER_DATABASE=true (and this parameter implies
that every diskgroup is mounted in Shared Mode, among other things).
In this context, it is quite obvious that Oracle strongly recommends to put OCR and voting disks
inside ASM: this (usually called CRS_DATA) will become diskgroup number 1
and ASM instances will mount it before CRS starts.
Then, additional diskgroup will be added by users, for DATA, REDO, FRA etc of each RAC db,
and will be mounted later when a RAC db instance starts on the specific node.
In case of fail-over cluster, where instances are not RAC type and there is
only one instance running (on one of the nodes) at any time for each db, it is different.
All diskgroups of db instances don't need to be mounted in Shared Mode,
because they are used by one instance only at a time
(on the contrary, they should be mounted in Exclusive Mode).
Yet, if you follow Oracle advice and put OCR and voting inside ASM, then:
- at installation OUI will start ASM instance on each node with CLUSTER_DATABASE=true;
- the first diskgroup, which contains OCR and votings, will be mounted Shared Mode;
- all other diskgroups, used by each db instance, will be mounted Shared Mode, too,
even if you'll take care that they'll be mounted by one ASM instance at a time.
At our site, for our three-nodes cluster, this fact has two consequences.
One conseguence is that we hit ORA-15068 limit (max 63 diskgroups) earlier than expected:
- none ot the instances on this cluster are Production (only Test, Dev, etc);
- we planned to have usually 10 instances on each node, each of them with 3 diskgroups (DATA, REDO, FRA),
so 30 diskgroups each node, for a total of 90 diskgroups (30 instances) on the cluster;
- in case one node failed, surviving two should get resources of the failing node,
in the worst case: one node with 60 diskgroups (20 instances), the other one with 30 diskgroups (10 instances)
- in case two nodes failed, the only node survived should not be able to mount additional diskgroups
(because of limit of max 63 diskgroup mounted by an ASM instance), so all other would remain unmounted
and their db instances stopped (they are not Production instances);
But it didn't worked, since ASM has parameter CLUSTER_DATABASE=true, so you cannot mount 90 diskgroups,
you can mount 62 globally (once a diskgroup is mounted on one node, it is given a number between 2 and 63,
and other diskgroups mounted on other nodes cannot reuse that number).
So as a matter of fact we can mount only 21 diskgroups (about 7 instances) on each node.
The second conseguence is that, every time our CRS handmade scripts dismount diskgroups
from one node and mount it to another, there are delays in the range of seconds (especially with multipath).
Also we found inside CRS log that, whenever we mounted diskgroups (on one node only), then
behind the scenes were created on the fly additional fake resources
of type ora*.dg, maybe to accomodate the fact that on other nodes those diskgroups were left unmounted
(once again, instances are single-node here, and not RAC type).
That's all.
Did anyone go into similar problems?
We opened a SR to Oracle asking about what options do we have here, and we are disappointed by their answer.
Regards
Oscar

Hi Klaas-Jan
- best practises require that also online redolog files are in a separate diskgroup, in case of ASM logical corruption (we are a little bit paranoid): in case DATA dg gets corrupted, you can restore Full backup plus Archived RedoLog plus Online Redolog (otherwise you will stop at the latest Archived).
So we have 3 diskgroups for each db instance: DATA, REDO, FRA.
- in case of fail-over cluster (active-passive), Oracle provide some templates of CRS scripts (in $CRS_HOME/crs/crs/public) that you edit and change at your will, also you might create additionale scripts in case of additional resources you might need (Oracle Agents, backups agent, file systems, monitoring tools, etc)
About our problem, the only solution is to move OCR and voting disks from ASM and change pfile af all ASM instance (parameter CLUSTER_DATABASE from true to false ).
Oracle aswers were a litlle bit odd:
- first they told us to use Grid Standalone (without CRS, OCR, voting at all), but we told them that we needed a Fail-over solution
- then they told us to use RAC Single Node, which actually has some better features, in csae of planned fail-over it might be able to migreate
client sessions without causing a reconnect (for SELECTs only, not in case of a running transaction), but we already have a few fail-over cluster, we cannot change them all
So we plan to move OCR and voting disks into block devices (we think that the other solution, which needs a Shared File System, will take longer).
Thanks Marko for pointing us to OCFS2 pros / cons.
We asked Oracle a confirmation that it supported, they said yes but it is discouraged (and also, doesn't work with OUI nor ASMCA).
Anyway that's the simplest approach, this is a non-Prod cluster, we'll start here and if everthing is fine, after a while we'll do it also on Prod ones.
- Note 605828.1, paragraph 5, Configuring non-raw multipath devices for Oracle Clusterware 11g (11.1.0, 11.2.0) on RHEL5/OL5
- Note 428681.1: OCR / Vote disk Maintenance Operations: (ADD/REMOVE/REPLACE/MOVE)
-"Grid Infrastructure Install on Linux", paragraph 3.1.6, Table 3-2
Oscar

Problem In Case Statement

HI ALL,
in the program,i need to display description based on condition type.
so we used CASE statement as below in LOOP. ITS not working .
could anyone please suggest if anything wrong in the following code.
LOOP AT gt_mat.
MOVE gt_mat-type TO gt_final-type.
Condition description
CASE gt_mat-type .
when 'N'.
move 'New' to gt_final-condes.
when 'B'.
move 'Block' to gt_final4-condes.
ENDCASE.
ENDLOOP.
please let me know whats the problem i above code and how to solve.
thanks in advance.

Hi,
The only solution for this could be to debug the program and check if the coresponding values are populated and available. You could also try to replace the CASE statement with a simple IF statement and check if its working.
LOOP AT gt_mat.
MOVE gt_mat-type TO gt_final-type.
* Condition description
IF gt_mat-type = 'N'.
gt_final-condes = 'New'.
elseif gt_mat-type = 'B'.
gt_final-condes ='Block'.
append gt_final.
clear gt_final.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
Also make sure the case of the value in gt_mat-type matches with the condition
Regards,
Vikranth

Delivery problem in case of Individual PO's

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for