Deploy error: j2ee version "2.4" not a valid enumeration type.

Hi!
I'm tasked with upgrading from WL Server 9.2 to 10.0, and got a strange error when deploying, namely that the contents of the version field of the web-app tag is not a valid enumeration value -- despite what the xsd says about it:
[wldeploy] weblogic.descriptor.DescriptorException: VALIDATION PROBLEMS WERE FOUND
[wldeploy] problem: cvc-enumeration-valid: string value '2.4' is not a valid enumeration value for web-app-versionType in namespace http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee:<null>
BUILD FAILED
/home/lars/Programming/Eclipse/ampep/Aas/build.xml:562: weblogic.Deployer$DeployerException: weblogic.deploy.api.tools.deployer.DeployerException: Task 102 failed: [Deployer:149026]redeploy application AmpEP on amplexServer.
Target state: redeploy failed on Server amplexServer
weblogic.descriptor.DescriptorException: VALIDATION PROBLEMS WERE FOUND
problem: cvc-enumeration-valid: string value '2.4' is not a valid enumeration value for web-app-versionType in namespace http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee:<null>The start of the web.xml in question is:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<web-app
     xmlns:j2ee="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"
     xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
     xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-app_2_4.xsd"
    version="2.4">If I remove the version attribute, it deploys under 10.0, but not under 9.2 (which we will be running until we're sure 10.0 works). Why is it going counter to the xsd? Is there something I can declare to make it happy? I notice the namespace ending in :<null>, is that a problem?
Thanks in advance,
-Lars Clausen

Hi,
I am also facing the same issue, Can you please tell me the solution if you have found anything...
Regards
Mani

Similar Messages

SOA Mediator - javax.xml.soap.SOAPException: oracle.j2ee.ws.saaj.ContentTypeException: Not a valid SOAP Content-Type: text/html

I am using SOA Mediator 11.1.1.7(11g) and while invoking a thrid party web service API I get the following error. Please help me fix this issue.
ORAMED-03302:[Exception in oneway execution]Unexpected exception in one-way operation "execute" on reference "AppvOffclJMSInAdapter_Exist_RS.AppvOffclJMSInAdapter_Exist_RS".Possible Fix:Check whether the reference service is properly configured and running or look at exception for analyzing the reason or contact Oracle Support Services. Cause:Unable to invoke endpoint URI "https://stripesqa.doe.gov/headergeneric/HeaderGeneric/HeaderGeneric.asmx" successfully due to: javax.xml.soap.SOAPException: oracle.j2ee.ws.saaj.ContentTypeException: Not a valid SOAP Content-Type: text/html
Thanks,
Veda

user9055538 wrote:
i test the soa webservcies in a browserHi,
It would help if you could give us more details...
What type of soa webservices are we talking about here (JAX-RPC/BPEL/OSB)?
And how exactly are you testing your soa webservices in a browser (EM)?
A valid SOAP will have content-type: text/xml
You may be pointing to a invalid endpoint or you may have an authentication/authorisation problem, so you are receiving html instead of soap...
Cheers,
Vlad

Oracle.j2ee.ws.saaj.ContentTypeException:Not a valid SOAP Content-Type:text

Hi,
I m trying to invoke external webservice using Oracle BPEL. I create BPEL process to invoke the webservice.
BPEL process invokes the external webservice, retrieving the session id,etc. But, when the same webservice is invoked again using the session id throught the same BPEL process, BPEL process is throwing this fault error:
<fault>
-<remoteFault xmlns="http://schemas.oracle.com/bpel/extension">
-<part name="summary">
<summary>
exception on JaxRpc invoke: HTTP transport error: javax.xml.soap.SOAPException: java.security.PrivilegedActionException: oracle.j2ee.ws.saaj.ContentTypeException: Not a valid SOAP Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
</summary>
</part>
</remoteFault>
</fault>
Can any one tell how to resolve the above exception...
Thanks in Advance.
Ajay

I am having a very similar problem. Did you end up solving this problem?

Oracle.j2ee.ws.saaj.ContentTypeException: Not a valid SOAP Content-Type: te

oracle.j2ee.ws.saaj.ContentTypeException: Not a valid SOAP Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Cause: oracle.j2ee.ws.saaj.ContentTypeException: Not a valid SOAP Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
I am getting the above error message when i test the soa webservcies in a browser.when i test with soap ui it works fine

user9055538 wrote:
i test the soa webservcies in a browserHi,
It would help if you could give us more details...
What type of soa webservices are we talking about here (JAX-RPC/BPEL/OSB)?
And how exactly are you testing your soa webservices in a browser (EM)?
A valid SOAP will have content-type: text/xml
You may be pointing to a invalid endpoint or you may have an authentication/authorisation problem, so you are receiving html instead of soap...
Cheers,
Vlad

The database error text is: ORA-01843: not a valid month

I am trying to use a date field as a query filter and I keep getting the
following error:
A database error occurred. The database error text is: ORA-01843: not a
valid month. (WIS 10901).
When I remove the query filter and run the query it works as
expected. I want to be able to allow the users to use the date field in order
to select a date range. Can someone provide me with some information on how to
resolve this issue.

SQL> SELECT (to_char(tO_date('09/29/2006', 'mm/dd/yyyy'))||':'||TO_CHAR(systimestamp,'hh24:mi:ss:ff6'))
2 FROM dual;
(TO_CHAR(TO_DATE('09/29/2006
29-SEP-06:01:33:09:023000
But you want mm/dd/yyyy hh24:mi:ss:ff6 format then use TO_CHAR function for format specifier
SQL> SELECT to_char(to_timestamp((to_char(tO_date('09/29/2006', 'mm/dd/yyyy'))||':'||TO_CHAR(systimestamp,'hh24:mi:ss:ff6')), 'dd/mm/yyyy hh24:mi:ss:ff6'),'mm/dd/yyyy hh24:mi:ss:ff6')
2 FROM DUAL
3 /
TO_CHAR(TO_TIMESTAMP((TO_CHAR
09/29/0006 01:40:27:113000
SQL> Khurram

HT1925 Can't update iTunes because of error message "iTunes.msi is not a valid installation package for the produce iTunes". How can I fix this?

I can't update iTunes because of error message "iTunes.msi is not a valid installation package for the product iTunes". How can this be resolved. I am using a PC with Windows XP

If you can, uninstall and reinstall itunes..... Removing and Reinstalling iTunes, QuickTime, and other software components for Windows XP
Hope this helps.

INSTALLATION FAILED( ERROR: CreateProcess failed == %1 is not a valid Wi

Whats wrong here? I am unable install jScreator on my XP professional SP2.!!
Below is the log file. System requirements are met but I get this error !!
file type: 0
file id: 0
length: 178
offset: 319579
file name: instructions.txt
file type: 5
file id: 1
length: 1009
offset: 319757
file name: Verify.jar
file type: 2
file id: 2
length: 729
offset: 320766
file name: launch.txt
file type: 4
file id: 3
length: 16766119
offset: 321495
file name: Windows-Sun-1.4.2_04.exe
file type: 6
file id: 4
length: 249333158
offset: 17087614
file name: windows.jar
ERROR: CreateProcess failed ==> %1 is not a valid Win32 application.

Cause
Windows ENV variable TEMP may result in this error.
Solution
To Correct this value: Start -> Settings -> Control Panel -> System -> Advanced -> Environmental Variables
Set the value for TEMP to a real directory on the machine: C:\temp as an example.
This corrected the behavior.

Re-Install and "Error 1325. Resources is not a valid short file name."

I am trying to reinstall the software (from install disk) and everytime I run it, I get this message "Error 1325. Resources is not a valid short file name." which then shuts down the install. I even downloaded the software from the website with the same error message. Anyone know how to fix this? I am trying to reinstall because the Palm Desktop will not run. If it matters I have a Palm TX.
Thanks for any info,
Brian
Post relates to: Palm TX
Message Edited by bpapiez on 10-24-2008 08:08 AM
Message Edited by bpapiez on 10-24-2008 08:08 AM

Hello and thank you for using the Palm Help Forums!
From what I researched this issue seems to be caused by Windows. I did find a post elsewhere that someone else was able to resolve it. I hope it helps:
http://community.macrovision.com/showthread.php?t=158002
-Pat
Post relates to: Treo 800w (Sprint)

ERROR: Archive found, but is not a valid Flash archive

Hello,
I have created flash archive file and tried to install a new server using it. Both servers are exactly the same type of servers.
While installing I get the following message:
ERROR: Archive found, but is not a valid Flash archive
The message appears despite the method of installation: http, ftp, nfs.
The source server is using Solaris 10 10/08 (the latest).
Did anybody faced similar problem ?
Regards
przemol

Hi, Thanks for your comments, its keep loading very big lengthy file...just copied some starting files.
Also...original flar image taken from T5 and now executing on T4 server just for your info.
Target server:
root@ebsapptr1 # uname -a
SunOS asgc-ebsapptr1 5.10 Generic_147147-26 sun4v sparc sun4v
Source server:
root@ebsapp1 # uname -a
SunOS ebsapp1 5.10 Generic_147147-26 sun4v sparc SUNW,T5140
# flar info -l askapp1.flar |more
lost+found
var
var/sadm
var/sadm/install
var/sadm/install/admin
var/sadm/install/admin/default
var/sadm/install/logs
var/sadm/install/logs/Additional_Software_install.A09241632
var/sadm/install/logs/Additional_Software_install.B09241632
var/sadm/install/logs/Additional_Software_install.A08292241
var/sadm/install/logs/Additional_Software_install.B08292241
var/sadm/install/contents
var/sadm/install/.lockfile
var/sadm/install/.pkg.lock
var/sadm/install/gz-only-packages
var/sadm/install/.pkg.lock.client
var/sadm/install/.door
var/sadm/pkg
var/sadm/pkg/SUNWocfd
var/sadm/pkg/SUNWocfd/install
var/sadm/pkg/SUNWocfd/install/copyright
var/sadm/pkg/SUNWocfd/save
var/sadm/pkg/SUNWocfd/save/pspool
var/sadm/pkg/SUNWocfd/save/pspool/SUNWocfd
var/sadm/pkg/SUNWocfd/save/pspool/SUNWocfd/install
var/sadm/pkg/SUNWocfd/save/pspool/SUNWocfd/install/copyright
var/sadm/pkg/SUNWocfd/save/pspool/SUNWocfd/pkginfo
var/sadm/pkg/SUNWocfd/save/pspool/SUNWocfd/pkgmap
var/sadm/pkg/SUNWocfd/pkginfo
var/sadm/pkg/SUNWlucfg
var/sadm/pkg/SUNWlucfg/install
var/sadm/pkg/SUNWlucfg/install/copyright
var/sadm/pkg/SUNWlucfg/install/r.AddNoUpdate
var/sadm/pkg/SUNWlucfg/install/r.EtcDefLu
var/sadm/pkg/SUNWlucfg/save
var/sadm/pkg/SUNWlucfg/save/pspool
var/sadm/pkg/SUNWlucfg/save/pspool/SUNWlucfg
var/sadm/pkg/SUNWlucfg/save/pspool/SUNWlucfg/install
var/sadm/pkg/SUNWlucfg/save/pspool/SUNWlucfg/install/copyright
var/sadm/pkg/SUNWlucfg/save/pspool/SUNWlucfg/install/i.AddNoUpdate
var/sadm/pkg/SUNWlucfg/save/pspool/SUNWlucfg/inst

Need @ Solution Error 1325. Favorites is not a valid short file name.

Hi all
Can anyone out there help me please?
Every time I try to get the latest upgrade for Adobe, the download goes smoothly but the installation halts at around 94% with the following error:
Error 1325. Favorites is not a valid short file name.
I have Windows 7 Ultimate N. This error doesn't appear to be limited to Adobe, it seems to arise in any installations that are downloaded from the web.
Cheers
N

Something in your Windows registry is pointing to an invalid folder.
Before trying to fix it manually, try http://fixitcenter.support.microsoft.com/Portal

Error 1325. Favorites is not a valid short file name.

Hi all
Can anyone out there help me please?
Every time I try to get the latest upgrade for Adobe, the download goes smoothly but the installation halts at around 94% with the following error:
Error 1325. Favorites is not a valid short file name.
I have Windows Vista Home Premium SP1. This error doesn't appear to be limited to Adobe, it seems to arise in any installations that are downloaded from the web.
Cheers

Just tried it...it didn't work and I got the same error code.
Thanks anyway. I don't suppose you have any other suggestions?

Deployment error using CMS (Component is not a SCA but a SDA)

I haven't seen this message before on the forum so I thought I'd see if anyone else has run into this. My landscape is as follows:
Runtime System: NW04 SP14
JDI System: NW04 SP19
SAP SCA plugins: NW04 SP14
Application: Standard web dynpro with 2 DC's (one for model and one for application)
Landscape: Dev (no runtime), Cons (no runtime), Test (runtime), Production (runtime)
I have migrated my local development of these DC's into the JDI following the standard help documentation for migrating web dynpros. Everything went smoothly (no errors during build in Dev and Cons, Assembly went fine).
I am at the point of attempting to import my new SCA into the Test runtime environment using standard CMS. I first imported the SAP_BUILDT, SAP_JEE, and SAP_TECHS into test. This imported fine and from my understanding nothing will deploy for these so all is good. When I import my SCA, the SDM-deploy step issues the following fatal error:
<b>Info:Starting Step SDM-deploy at 2007-04-06 11:44:20.0344 -7:00
Info:start deployment of archives to SDM:http://myserver:50018
Info:The following archives will be deployed (on http://myserver:50018)
Info:E:\usr\sap\JTrans\CMS\archives\pcbp.comVMRSJDV_VMRS_C~20070406171501.sca
Fatal:Unexpected exception 'Component [Name: vmrs , Vendor: pcbp.com] is not a SCA, but a SDA.' occurred. Stopping processing.
Fatal Exception:java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Component [Name: vmrs , Vendor: pcbp.com] is not a SCA, but a SDA.:Component [Name: vmrs , Vendor: pcbp.com] is not a SCA, but a SDA.
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Component [Name: vmrs , Vendor: pcbp.com] is not a SCA, but a SDA.
     at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
     at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:39)
     at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:27)
     at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:274)
.....</b>
Has anyone seen this message before or have any thoughts as to what may be the issue? I have searched the forums and OSS for the "Component is not a SCA but a SDA" message and have been unsucessful. I have validated that the archive is in fact packaged as an SCA file. I attempted to rename it from the file system to a .sda to see what would happen but that was not successful. One more bit of info that may be helpful is that there may have been a previous application deployed on the runtime environment with the same name. Prior to attempting to deploy the JDI version, I had removed the app (the non JDI one) from the server using the Deploy service of Visual Administrator so there shouldn't be a conflict there right?
Message was edited by:
        Eric Vota
I think I figured this out. When I remove the application via the Visual Admin deploy service it does not synchronize with the SDM. For that reason, the old application (which was a deployed SDA) was still in the SDM repository. I am in process of using the SDM deploy tool to remove the offending application. After that I will attempt to reimport the SCA via the CMS. Hopefully this works. I'll update the post with the result in case anyone else has this problem.

This was fixed by undeploying from the SDM instead of from Visual Admin. Good to go now

I've upgraded to 6.0.1 and now firefox no longer loades AT ALL. I get this XULRunner error: Platform version "5.0" not compatable with minVersion = 6.0.1 and maxVersion = 6.0.1. What can I do to get Firefox working again as my browser?

After deleting everything, I've also tried to reload 3.6.12 fresh and I get a totally different nss3.dll entry point cannot be found error.

Download a fresh Firefox copy and save the file to the desktop.
* Firefox 6.0.x: http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all.html
* Uninstall your current Firefox version.
* Do not remove personal data when you uninstall the current version.
Remove the Firefox program folder before installing that newly downloaded copy of the Firefox installer.
* It is important to delete the Firefox program folder to remove all the files and make sure that there are no problems with files that were leftover after uninstalling.
Your bookmarks and other profile data are stored elsewhere in the Firefox Profile Folder and won't be affected by a reinstall, but make sure that you do not select to remove personal data if you uninstall Firefox.
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_folder_-_Firefox
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_backup

Firefox was working but now it will not start. I get the following error: XLURunner error: Platform version '5.0' not compatible with minVersion =2.0.1 maxVersion = 2.0.1

I am using Windows XP with Service pack 3

* http://kb.mozillazine.org/Browser_will_not_start_up#XULRunner_error_after_an_update
Download a fresh Firefox copy and save the file to the desktop.
* Firefox 5.0.x: http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all.html
* Uninstall your current Firefox version.
* Do not remove personal data when you uninstall the current version.
Remove the Firefox program folder before installing that newly downloaded copy of the Firefox installer.
* It is important to delete the Firefox program folder to remove all the files and make sure that there are no problems with files that were leftover after uninstalling.
Your bookmarks and other profile data are stored elsewhere in the [http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_folder_-_Firefox Firefox Profile Folder] and won't be affected by a reinstall, but make sure that you do not select to remove personal data if you uninstall Firefox.

PSE 9.0 error: ".....not a valid photoshop document"

Platform is XP Pro...camera is Canon compact digital.
I downloaded photos to desktop folder. PSE allowed me to open the first 3 photos from the folder to edit, then I got the above error message.
However, when I right click on the photo in the desktopp folder to "open with Photoshop Elements" the PSE 9.0 editor opened all the photos.
WHY?
TIA,
Doc

I know this thread is a bit old, but I wanted to share my experience and solution in case anyone else runs into this.
The other day, I spent many hours editing some photos for a client. I saved them all and closed Photoshop. When I tried to open the .PSDs, they all came up with this "Not a valid Photoshop document" error. I was freaking out. I could see the thunmbnails and previews with the MacOS Finder and could see the images just fine in Lightroom, but couldn't open them in Photoshop CC.
Finally, I remembered that these were NOT supposed to be .psd files! They were supposed to be TIFFs. What happened was, when I edited them from within Lightroom into Photoshop, they opened as TIFFs. However, when I did "save as", I wanted to name them similarly to some other files I had. I clicked on one of the existing files to copy the file name in the Save As dialog to make it easier to name the new file I was saving, but I didn't realize it was changing the file extention from ".tif" to ".psd" as well. The older MacOS (version 9 and earlier) didn't rely on file extensions fo identifying file types, so it didn't hit me right away that this would be the problem. When I changed the incorrect .psd file extension to .tiff, the files opened in Photoshop just fine.
SO... if you run into this "Not a valid Photoshop document" error, try figuring out if it's actually another file type (.jpg, .tif, .png, etc) by either getting the file info from another program or just experimenting with different file extensions. Chances are good that your file isn't actually corrupt, but just named improperly!

Deploy error: j2ee version "2.4" not a valid enumeration type.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for