Design topology
I am looking for best design approach for a topology supporting vlan, ip telephony, video conferencing and wireless solution
thanks.
Even I am providing you with some links for guidance... you will need to sit down and put all your needs together to make the BEST design for your company.... but in essence you need to look at
1- Centralize vs. Distribute
2- Headquarters, Regional Office, Branch needs
3- Network Security (internal, External
4- Wireless (Guest, Employee, BYOD)
Wireless Design Best Practices
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/ciscoitatwork/downloads/ciscoitatwork/pdf/Cisco_IT_Wireless_LAN_Design_Guide.pdf
VoIP
(BOOK)
http://www.ciscopress.com/articles/article.asp?p=1966660
(VoIP RF)
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/collateral/ns340/ns394/ns348/net_implementation_white_paper0900aecd804f1a46.html
QOS solutions (Voice & Video)
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/solutions/Enterprise/WAN_and_MAN/QoS_SRND/Enterprise_QoS_SRND.pdf
Branch Office with Config Example
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/ciscoitatwork/downloads/ciscoitatwork/pdf/Cisco_IT_Remote_Office_Design_Guide.pdf
Similar Messages
-
Cannot start ODI Designer & Topology after creating Master repository
Hi all,
After creating the master repository in ODI, i cannot open all ODI tools such as Designer, Topology Manager, Security Manager e.t.c. The real problem is the fact that no error message is appeared after giving user name and password.
Could someone help me?
regards,
George V.Hi,
After creating the repositories are you directly logging into the Designer or
Topology.......
You need to create a work repository connection for ur Designer and topology.......i think u might have missed this.......
Is it helpful........
Thanks
AK -
Facing very slowly response when opening operator
Hi all,
I have an issue when opening an operator module on the customer site.
I opened operator from my laptop that connect to the master / work rep on oracle11g (11.0.2.1)
and my laptop consume so much memory and CPU and then hang when click any scenario that reside on the work rep. (they have around 30,xxx scenarios on this work rep)
I don't know what's going on with this work rep. How can I track this kind of problem.
From the way that I look into this problem ,
I think the operator on my laptop try to gather some information (that's need to be shown on the operator) from the work rep into the memory (so that's why my taskmgr shows the javaw.exe consume so much CPU / Mem) and then hang.
Tried to use another machine even if it is a server machine to open operator but no luck the result was the same (consume a lot of mem / cpu and then hang).
PS. Designer / Topology are working fine with a normal response
PS2. ODI10g (10.1.3.3) + Oracle DB 11g (dedicated as repository data only)
and I decided to upgraded ODI10g to 11g and use the ODI Studio.
After a successfully upgraded
I opened up a ODI Studio and reconfig the profile to point to the upgraded repository.
Then the same problem occurs (just consume a large amount of mem / CPU and then hang)
If I just config the ODI profile to connect to only master rep. It could open only the topology (but not hang).
Thanks for any clue ,hi Sutirtha ,
I also deleting snp_exp_txt (but this table didn't contain to much records for me)
and about the odipurgelog function
I could not exec at the OS command , am I right?
I have to connect to the designer and create a package that contain odifunction
and then execute them , Correct?
then the big problem for me is
now I could not connect to the ODI Studio. T-T
I queried the amount of records from
all_tables system table.
TABLE_NAME NUM_ROWS
SNP_SESS_TXT_LOG 5709131
SNP_SESS_TASK 2009708
SNP_SESS_TASK_LOG 1434722
SNP_SCEN_TASK 385088
SNP_SESS_STEP 254390
SNP_STEP_REPORT 244089
SNP_SCEN_REPORT 202321
SNP_STEP_LOG 139879
SNP_SESSION 119198
SNP_SCEN_STEP 47079
SNP_SCEN 21594
Im still doubt that this is just a development env
the SIT env (System Integration Test)
have a lot of data more than DEV
but the issue on the operator does not appear.
here is the amount of records on SIT ENV
TABLE_NAME NUM_ROWS
SNP_TASK_TXT 9379599
SNP_SESS_TXT_LOG 5629059
SNP_SESS_TASK 1998854
SNP_SCEN_TXT 1790998
SNP_SESS_TASK_LOG 1416291
SNP_EXP_TXT 813182
SNP_SCEN_TASK 374307
SNP_SESS_STEP 250445
SNP_STEP_REPORT 230091
SNP_SCEN_REPORT 190137
SNP_STEP_LOG 136835
any ideas are welcome
Big thanks in advance guys -
Design of network topology with beautiful aesthetics.
Dear,
How do I make a drawing like this website? How do I insert rows with 3D effect?
http://4sysops.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Graphical-Representation-of-the-Test-Lab.png
Blog - Windows e TecnologiaHi,
If you are using Visio 2013, as Mr. Al said it has more 3D network shapes which we may choose.
Then, please see the article, it also may be help for you:
http://www.visguy.com/2007/10/29/oblique-connectors-for-your-3d-diagrams/
Please Note: Since the web site is not hosted by Microsoft, the link may change without notice. Microsoft does not guarantee the accuracy of this information.
George Zhao
TechNet Community Support -
Unable to view data in designer.
Hi,
I have successfully imported metadata into the designer in ODI but when I attempt to view the data in the table I get an error message :
"There is no connection for this logical schema/context pair: XXX_src_Schema / GLOBAL"
I am having trouble troubleshooting this issue. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
TIA
ODI Version : 10.1.3.5Hi,
Its coz your logical schema XXX_src_Schema doesn't have related context pair. Open Topology Manager -> Logical Architecture ->XXX_src_Schema and add Global Context with corresponding Physical schema.
Thanks,
G -
We have a SharePoint Enterprise 2013 system at RTM level. We've installed Workflow Manager 1.0 by following the steps at
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj658588.aspx. For the final step of Validating the Installation we created a simple list-level workflow and verified that the workflow
is invoked successfully. This is working successfully, but only for a single user. If other users in the same site collection try to invoke the workflow on this same list we get the ULS Log Error:
Claims Authentication af3zp Unexpected STS Call Claims Saml: Problem getting output claims identity. Exception: 'Microsoft.SharePoint.SPException: The specified user or domain group was not found. --->
System.Security.Principal.IdentityNotMappedException: Some or all identity references could not be translated.
followed by:
Failed to issue new security token. Exception: Microsoft.SharePoint.SPException: The specified user or domain group was not found. ---> System.Security.Principal.IdentityNotMappedException: Some or all identity references could not be translated.
(as details below).
All accounts that are attempting to use the Test Workflow (both working and non-working user accounts) are valid AD accounts and are included in the User Profile Sync that runs nightly. All have Contribute or Design permission level (and for testing,
Full Control).
What could cause the Claims Authentication to fail when certain users attempt to launch the workflow?
Thank you for your response.
Jim Mac.
08/29/2013 10:22:51.94 w3wp.exe (0x2020) 0x26D8 SharePoint Foundation
Claims Authentication af3zp Unexpected STS Call Claims Saml: Problem getting output claims identity. Exception: 'Microsoft.SharePoint.SPException: The specified user or domain group was
not found. ---> System.Security.Principal.IdentityNotMappedException: Some or all identity references could not be translated. at System.Security.Principal.NTAccount.Translate(IdentityReferenceCollection sourceAccounts, Type targetType,
Boolean forceSuccess) at System.Security.Principal.NTAccount.Translate(Type targetType) at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.Claims.SPClaimProviderManager.GetProviderUserKeyClaim(IClaimsIdentity claimsIdentity,
SPClaim loginClaim) --- End of inner exception stack trace --- at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.Claims.SPClaimProviderManager.GetProviderUserKeyClaim(IClaimsIdentity claimsIdent... 94aa5c2d-fa45-9b83-b203-a92b20102583
08/29/2013 10:22:51.94* w3wp.exe (0x2020) 0x26D8 SharePoint Foundation
Claims Authentication af3zp Unexpected ...ity, SPClaim loginClaim) at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.Claims.SPClaimProviderManager.GetProviderUserKey(String
encodedIdentityClaimSuffix) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.CreateTokenCacheReferenceFromTokenSignature(SPRequestInfo requestInfo, IClaimsIdentity identity) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.AugmentTokenCacheReferenceClaim(SPRequestInfo
requestInfo, IClaimsIdentity identity) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.AugmentOutputIdentityForRequest(SPRequestInfo requestInfo, IClaimsIdentity outputIdentity) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.GetOutputClaimsIdentity(IClaimsPrincipal
principal, RequestSecurityToken request, Scope scope)'. 94aa5c2d-fa45-9b83-b203-a92b20102583
08/29/2013 10:22:51.94 w3wp.exe (0x2020) 0x26D8 SharePoint Foundation
Claims Authentication fo1t Monitorable STS Call: Failed to issue new security token. Exception: Microsoft.SharePoint.SPException: The specified user or domain group was not found. --->
System.Security.Principal.IdentityNotMappedException: Some or all identity references could not be translated. at System.Security.Principal.NTAccount.Translate(IdentityReferenceCollection sourceAccounts, Type targetType, Boolean forceSuccess)
at System.Security.Principal.NTAccount.Translate(Type targetType) at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.Claims.SPClaimProviderManager.GetProviderUserKeyClaim(IClaimsIdentity claimsIdentity, SPClaim loginClaim)
--- End of inner exception stack trace --- at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.Claims.SPClaimProviderManager.GetProviderUserKeyClaim(IClaimsIdentity claimsIdentity, SPClaim logi... 94aa5c2d-fa45-9b83-b203-a92b20102583
08/29/2013 10:22:51.94* w3wp.exe (0x2020) 0x26D8 SharePoint Foundation
Claims Authentication fo1t Monitorable ...nClaim) at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.Claims.SPClaimProviderManager.GetProviderUserKey(String encodedIdentityClaimSuffix)
at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.CreateTokenCacheReferenceFromTokenSignature(SPRequestInfo requestInfo, IClaimsIdentity identity) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.AugmentTokenCacheReferenceClaim(SPRequestInfo
requestInfo, IClaimsIdentity identity) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.AugmentOutputIdentityForRequest(SPRequestInfo requestInfo, IClaimsIdentity outputIdentity) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.GetOutputClaimsIdentity(IClaimsPrincipal
principal, RequestSecurityToken request, Scope scope) at Microsoft.IdentityModel.Securi... 94aa5c2d-fa45-9b83-b203-a92b20102583
08/29/2013 10:22:51.94* w3wp.exe (0x2020) 0x26D8 SharePoint Foundation
Claims Authentication fo1t Monitorable ...tyTokenService.SecurityTokenService.Issue(IClaimsPrincipal principal, RequestSecurityToken request) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.Issue(IClaimsPrincipal
principal, RequestSecurityToken request) 94aa5c2d-fa45-9b83-b203-a92b20102583Hi Aries,
I am facing issue with work flow where Workflow goes to Suspend mode.
I am facing an issue with SP2013 Custom Workflow developed using Visual Studio 2012.
Objective of the Custom workflow: User fills the form and submit, list get updated and workflow will initiate and go for the process.
Issue: After the deployment of WF, for first time when user is filling the form and submit, list is getting updated. But the Workflow Goes to "Suspend" mode. (
This Custom Workflow has a configuration file where we are providing other details including ID of Impersonator (farm is running under Claim Based Authentication).
Work flow works fine once when the Impersonator initiate the workflow (Fill the form and submit for approval) and everything works fine after that.
Following steps are already performed
1.Make sure User profile synchronization is started.
2.Make sure the user is not the SharePoint system user.
3.Make sure the user by whom you are logged is available in User Profile list.
4.Step full synchronization of User Profile Application.
From the ULS logs it seems the user's security token from the STS service and User profile service is not being issued.
Appreciate any thoughts or solution.
Following are the log files.
<-------------------------------Information taken from "http://YYYY.XXXXX.com/sites/xxxx/_layouts/15/wrkstat.aspx" where it is showing workflow status as "Suspend"------->
http://yyyy.XXXX.com/sites/xxxx/_vti_bin/client.svc/sp.utilities.utility.ResolvePrincipalInCurrentcontext(input=@ParamUser,scopes='15',sources='15',inputIsEmailOnly='false',addToUserInfoList='False')?%40ParamUser='i%3A0%23.w%7CXXXXX%5Csps_biscomdev'
Correlation Id: f5bd8793-a53c-2127-bfb1-70bc172425e8 Instance Id: 14a985a0-60c8-42db-a42c-c752190b8106
RequestorId: f5bd8793-a53c-2127-0000-000000000000. Details: RequestorId: f5bd8793-a53c-2127-0000-000000000000. Details: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the workflow instance. Exception details: System.ApplicationException: HTTP 401
{"error_description":"The server was unable to process the request due to an internal error. For more information about the error, either turn on IncludeExceptionDetailInFaults (either from ServiceBehaviorAttribute or from the <serviceDebug>
configuration behavior) on the server in order to send the exception information back to the client, or turn on tracing as per the Microsoft .NET Framework SDK documentation and inspect the server trace logs."} {"x-ms-diagnostics":["3001000;reason=\"There
has been an error authenticating the request.\";category=\"invalid_client\""],"SPRequestGuid":["f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8654-672758a68234"],"request-id":["f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8654-672758a68234"],"X-FRAME-OPTIONS":["SAMEORIGIN"],"SPRequestDuration":["34"],"SPIisLatency":["0"],"Server":["Microsoft-IIS\/7.5"],"WWW-Authenticate":["Bearer
realm=\"b14e1e0f-257f-42ec-a92d-377479e0ec8d\",client_id=\"00000003-0000-0ff1-ce00-000000000000\",trusted_issuers=\"00000005-0000-0000-c000-000000000000@*,[email protected]79e0ec8d\"","NTLM"],"X-Powered-By":["ASP.NET"],"MicrosoftSharePointTeamServices":["15.0.0.4420"],"X-Content-Type-Options":["nosniff"],"X-MS-InvokeApp":["1;
RequireReadOnly"],"Date":["Fri, 10 Apr 2015 19:48:07 GMT"]} at Microsoft.Activities.Hosting.Runtime.Subroutine.SubroutineChild.Execute(CodeActivityContext context) at System.Activities.CodeActivity.InternalExecute(ActivityInstance
instance, ActivityExecutor executor, BookmarkManager bookmarkManager) at System.Activities.Runtime.ActivityExecutor.ExecuteActivityWorkItem.ExecuteBody(ActivityExecutor executor, BookmarkManager bookmarkManager, Location resultLocation)
ULS Log
04/16/2015 15:22:03.70 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation Authentication Authorization agb9s Medium OAuth request. IsAuthenticated=False, UserIdentityName=, ClaimsCount=0 f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.70 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation Runtime ajd6k Verbose Value for isAnonymousAllowed is : False f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.70 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation Runtime ajd6l Verbose Value for checkAuthenticationCookie is : True f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.70 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8b Verbose Looking up context site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in the farm SharePoint_Config_QA f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.70 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8d Verbose Looking up the additional information about the typical site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.71 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8f Verbose Site lookup is replacing
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly with the alternate access url
http://inetdev. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.71 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8g Verbose Looking up typical site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.71 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8h Verbose Found typical site /sites/testrpa2 (407ba20c-079b-4b99-9e70-f86e6e13ddde) in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.71 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8b Verbose Looking up context site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in the farm SharePoint_Config_QA f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.71 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8d Verbose Looking up the additional information about the typical site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.71 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8f Verbose Site lookup is replacing
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly with the alternate access url
http://inetdev. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.71 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8g Verbose Looking up typical site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.71 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8h Verbose Found typical site /sites/testrpa2 (407ba20c-079b-4b99-9e70-f86e6e13ddde) in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.71 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation Monitoring b4ly Medium Leaving Monitored Scope (Request (GET:http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly)). Execution Time=18.7574119057031 f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.71 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8b Verbose Looking up context site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in the farm SharePoint_Config_QA f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.71 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8d Verbose Looking up the additional information about the typical site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.71 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8f Verbose Site lookup is replacing
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly with the alternate access url
http://inetdev. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.71 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8g Verbose Looking up typical site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.71 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8h Verbose Found typical site /sites/testrpa2 (407ba20c-079b-4b99-9e70-f86e6e13ddde) in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.73 PowerShell.exe (0x29BC) 0x2B9C SharePoint Foundation General narq Verbose Releasing SPRequest with allocation Id {AF89E1D7-C47F-467B-8FD4-D7DC768820EE}
04/16/2015 15:22:03.73 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8b Verbose Looking up context site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in the farm SharePoint_Config_QA
04/16/2015 15:22:03.73 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8d Verbose Looking up the additional information about the typical site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly.
04/16/2015 15:22:03.73 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8f Verbose Site lookup is replacing
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly with the alternate access url
http://inetdev.
04/16/2015 15:22:03.73 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8g Verbose Looking up typical site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80.
04/16/2015 15:22:03.73 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8h Verbose Found typical site /sites/testrpa2 (407ba20c-079b-4b99-9e70-f86e6e13ddde) in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80.
04/16/2015 15:22:03.73 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation Monitoring nasq Medium Entering monitored scope (Request (GET:http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly)). Parent No
04/16/2015 15:22:03.73 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8b Verbose Looking up context site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in the farm SharePoint_Config_QA
04/16/2015 15:22:03.73 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8d Verbose Looking up the additional information about the typical site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly.
04/16/2015 15:22:03.73 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8f Verbose Site lookup is replacing
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly with the alternate access url
http://inetdev.
04/16/2015 15:22:03.73 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8g Verbose Looking up typical site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80.
04/16/2015 15:22:03.73 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8h Verbose Found typical site /sites/testrpa2 (407ba20c-079b-4b99-9e70-f86e6e13ddde) in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80.
04/16/2015 15:22:03.73 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation Logging Correlation Data xmnv Medium Name=Request (GET:http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly) f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.74 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation Monitoring nasq Medium Entering monitored scope (Application Authentication Pipeline). Parent Request (GET:http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly) f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.74 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8b Verbose Looking up context site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in the farm SharePoint_Config_QA f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.74 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8d Verbose Looking up the additional information about the typical site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.74 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8f Verbose Site lookup is replacing
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly with the alternate access url
http://inetdev. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.74 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8g Verbose Looking up typical site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.74 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8h Verbose Found typical site /sites/testrpa2 (407ba20c-079b-4b99-9e70-f86e6e13ddde) in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.75 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation Claims Authentication ah25l Medium SPJsonWebSecurityBaseTokenHandler: ValidateActorIsSelfIssuer! Issuer '00000005-0000-0000-c000-000000000000' is not self
issuer. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.75 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation Monitoring nasq Medium Entering monitored scope (Getting Site Subscription Id). Parent [S2S] Getting token from STS and setting Thread Identity f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.75 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8b Verbose Looking up context site
http://inetdev/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in the farm SharePoint_Config_QA f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.75 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8d Verbose Looking up the additional information about the typical site
http://inetdev/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.75 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8f Verbose Site lookup is replacing
http://inetdev/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly with the alternate access url
http://inetdev. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.75 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8g Verbose Looking up typical site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.75 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8h Verbose Found typical site /sites/testrpa2 (407ba20c-079b-4b99-9e70-f86e6e13ddde) in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.75 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation Monitoring b4ly Medium Leaving Monitored Scope (Getting Site Subscription Id). Execution Time=0.341314329055788 f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.75 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation Monitoring nasq Medium Entering monitored scope (Reading token from Cache using token signature). Parent [S2S] Getting token from STS and setting Thread
Identity f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.76 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General ajji6 High Unable to write SPDistributedCache call usage entry. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.76 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation Monitoring b4ly Medium Leaving Monitored Scope (Reading token from Cache using token signature). Execution Time=7.5931438213516 f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.76 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation Application Authentication ajwpx Medium SPApplicationAuthenticationModule: Failed to build cache key for user f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.76 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation Topology aeayb Medium SecurityTokenServiceSendRequest: RemoteAddress: 'http://localhost:32843/SecurityTokenServiceApplication/securitytoken.svc' Channel:
'Microsoft.IdentityModel.Protocols.WSTrust.IWSTrustChannelContract' Action: 'http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200512/RST/Issue' MessageId: 'urn:uuid:fd5eba94-c39d-4667-89bd-089411c87f09' f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.77 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Foundation Topology aeax9 Medium SecurityTokenServiceReceiveRequest: LocalAddress: 'http://c1vspwfe01.vitas.com:32843/SecurityTokenServiceApplication/securitytoken.svc'
Channel: 'System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel' Action: 'http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200512/RST/Issue' MessageId: 'urn:uuid:fd5eba94-c39d-4667-89bd-089411c87f09' f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.77 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Foundation Monitoring nasq Medium Entering monitored scope (ExecuteSecurityTokenServiceOperationServer). Parent No f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.78 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Foundation Claims Authentication ah25l Medium SPJsonWebSecurityBaseTokenHandler: ValidateActorIsSelfIssuer! Issuer '00000005-0000-0000-c000-000000000000' is not self
issuer. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.78 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Foundation General narq Verbose Releasing SPRequest with allocation Id {F17590DF-49D9-439D-86BC-5AE6416BB765} f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.78 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8b Verbose Looking up site
http://inetdev/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in the farm SharePoint_Config_QA f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.78 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8d Verbose Looking up the additional information about the typical site
http://inetdev/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.78 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8f Verbose Site lookup is replacing
http://inetdev/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly with the alternate access url
http://inetdev. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.78 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8g Verbose Looking up typical site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.78 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8h Verbose Found typical site /sites/testrpa2 (407ba20c-079b-4b99-9e70-f86e6e13ddde) in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.78 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Foundation General narq Verbose Releasing SPRequest with allocation Id {3847D5A4-15C6-4AF9-B062-E22BB555DF4F} f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.78 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Portal Server User Profiles ae0s1 High Identity claims mapped to '0' user profiles. Claims: [nameid: '', nii: 'windows', upn: '', smtp: '', sip: ''], User Profiles: f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.78 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Portal Server User Profiles ae0sr Unexpected UserProfileException caught.. Exception Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileNoUserFoundException: 3001002;reason=The
incoming identity is not mapped to any user profile account in SharePoint. Possible cause is that no user profiles are created in user profile database. Contact your administrator. at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.GetSingleUserProfileFromClaimsList(UserProfileManager
upManager, IEnumerable`1 identityClaims) at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.<>c__DisplayClass2.<GetMappedIdentityClaim>b__0() is thrown. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.78 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Portal Server User Profiles ae0su High The set of claims could not be mapped to a single user identity. Exception 3001002;reason=The incoming identity is not mapped
to any user profile account in SharePoint. Possible cause is that no user profiles are created in user profile database. Contact your administrator. has occured. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.78 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Foundation Claims Authentication ae0tc High The registered mappered failed to resolve to one identity claim. Exception: Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileNoUserFoundException:
3001002;reason=The incoming identity is not mapped to any user profile account in SharePoint. Possible cause is that no user profiles are created in user profile database. Contact your administrator. at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.GetSingleUserProfileFromClaimsList(UserProfileManager
upManager, IEnumerable`1 identityClaims) at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.<>c__DisplayClass2.<GetMappedIdentityClaim>b__0() at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurity.<>c__DisplayClass5.<RunWithElevatedPrivileges>b__3()
at Microsoft.SharePoint.Utilities.SecurityContext.RunAsProcess(CodeToRunElevated secureCode) at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurity.RunWithElevatedPrivileges(WaitCallback secureCode, Object param) at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurity.RunWithElevatedPrivileges(CodeToRunElevated
secureCode) at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.GetMappedIdentityClaim(Uri context, IEnumerable`1 identityClaims) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPIdentityClaimMapperOperations.GetClaimFromExternalMapper(Uri
contextUri, List`1 claims) f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.78 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Foundation Claims Authentication af3zp Unexpected STS Call Claims Saml: Problem getting output claims identity. Exception: 'Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileNoUserFoundException:
3001002;reason=The incoming identity is not mapped to any user profile account in SharePoint. Possible cause is that no user profiles are created in user profile database. Contact your administrator. at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.GetSingleUserProfileFromClaimsList(UserProfileManager
upManager, IEnumerable`1 identityClaims) at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.<>c__DisplayClass2.<GetMappedIdentityClaim>b__0() at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurity.<>c__DisplayClass5.<RunWithElevatedPrivileges>b__3()
at Microsoft.SharePoint.Utilities.SecurityContext.RunAsProcess(CodeToRunElevated secureCode) at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurity.RunWithElevatedPrivileges(WaitCallback secureCode, Object param) at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurity.RunWithElevatedPrivileges(CodeToRunElevated
secureCode) at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.GetMappedIdentityClaim(Uri context, IEnumerable`1 identityClaims) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPIdentityClaimMapperOperations.GetClaimFromExternalMapper(Uri
contextUri, List`1 claims) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPIdentityClaimMapperOperations.ResolveUserIdentityClaim(Uri contextUri, ClaimCollection inputClaims) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPIdentityClaimMapperOperations.GetIdentityClaim(Uri
contextUri, ClaimCollection inputClaims, SPCallingIdentityType callerType) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.GetLogonIdentityClaim(SPRequestInfo requestInfo, IClaimsIdentity inputIdentity, IClaimsIdentity
outputIdentity, SPCallingIdentityType callerType) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.EnsureSharePointClaims(SPRequestInfo requestInfo, IClaimsIdentity outputIdentity, SPCallingIdentityType callerType)
at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.AugmentOutputIdentityForRequest(SPRequestInfo requestInfo, IClaimsIdentity outputIdentity) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.GetOutputClaimsIdentity(IClaimsPrincipal
principal, RequestSecurityToken request, Scope scope)'. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.78 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Foundation Claims Authentication fo1t Monitorable STS Call: Failed to issue new security token. Exception: Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileNoUserFoundException:
3001002;reason=The incoming identity is not mapped to any user profile account in SharePoint. Possible cause is that no user profiles are created in user profile database. Contact your administrator. at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.GetSingleUserProfileFromClaimsList(UserProfileManager
upManager, IEnumerable`1 identityClaims) at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.<>c__DisplayClass2.<GetMappedIdentityClaim>b__0() at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurity.<>c__DisplayClass5.<RunWithElevatedPrivileges>b__3()
at Microsoft.SharePoint.Utilities.SecurityContext.RunAsProcess(CodeToRunElevated secureCode) at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurity.RunWithElevatedPrivileges(WaitCallback secureCode, Object param) at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurity.RunWithElevatedPrivileges(CodeToRunElevated
secureCode) at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.GetMappedIdentityClaim(Uri context, IEnumerable`1 identityClaims) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPIdentityClaimMapperOperations.GetClaimFromExternalMapper(Uri
contextUri, List`1 claims) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPIdentityClaimMapperOperations.ResolveUserIdentityClaim(Uri contextUri, ClaimCollection inputClaims) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPIdentityClaimMapperOperations.GetIdentityClaim(Uri
contextUri, ClaimCollection inputClaims, SPCallingIdentityType callerType) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.GetLogonIdentityClaim(SPRequestInfo requestInfo, IClaimsIdentity inputIdentity, IClaimsIdentity
outputIdentity, SPCallingIdentityType callerType) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.EnsureSharePointClaims(SPRequestInfo requestInfo, IClaimsIdentity outputIdentity, SPCallingIdentityType callerType)
at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.AugmentOutputIdentityForRequest(SPRequestInfo requestInfo, IClaimsIdentity outputIdentity) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.GetOutputClaimsIdentity(IClaimsPrincipal
principal, RequestSecurityToken request, Scope scope) at Microsoft.IdentityModel.SecurityTokenService.SecurityTokenService.Issue(IClaimsPrincipal principal, RequestSecurityToken request) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.Issue(IClaimsPrincipal
principal, RequestSecurityToken request) f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.79 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Foundation Monitoring b4ly Medium Leaving Monitored Scope (ExecuteSecurityTokenServiceOperationServer). Execution Time=17.1551132895382 f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.79 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation Claims Authentication fsq7 High SPSecurityContext: Request for security token failed with exception: System.ServiceModel.FaultException: The server was
unable to process the request due to an internal error. For more information about the error, either turn on IncludeExceptionDetailInFaults (either from ServiceBehaviorAttribute or from the <serviceDebug> configuration behavior) on the server in
order to send the exception information back to the client, or turn on tracing as per the Microsoft .NET Framework SDK documentation and inspect the server trace logs. at Microsoft.IdentityModel.Protocols.WSTrust.WSTrustChannel.ReadResponse(Message
response) at Microsoft.IdentityModel.Protocols.WSTrust.WSTrustChannel.Issue(RequestSecurityToken rst, RequestSecurityTokenResponse& rstr) at Microsoft.IdentityModel.Protocols.WSTrust.WSTrustChannel.Issue(RequestSecurityToken
rst) at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurityContext.SecurityTokenForContext(Uri context, Boolean bearerToken, SecurityToken onBehalfOf, SecurityToken actAs, SecurityToken delegateTo, SPRequestSecurityTokenProperties properties) f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.79 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation Claims Authentication 8306 Critical An exception occurred when trying to issue security token: The server was unable to process the request due to an internal
error. For more information about the error, either turn on IncludeExceptionDetailInFaults (either from ServiceBehaviorAttribute or from the <serviceDebug> configuration behavior) on the server in order to send the exception information back to
the client, or turn on tracing as per the Microsoft .NET Framework SDK documentation and inspect the server trace logs.. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.79 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation Monitoring b4ly Medium Leaving Monitored Scope (Application Authentication Pipeline). Execution Time=52.3525336320678 f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.79 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation Application Authentication ajezs High SPApplicationAuthenticationModule: Error authenticating request, Error details { Header: {0}, Body: {1} }. Available
parameters: 3001000;reason="There has been an error authenticating the request.";category="invalid_client" {"error_description":"The server was unable to process the request due to an internal error. For more information
about the error, either turn on IncludeExceptionDetailInFaults (either from ServiceBehaviorAttribute or from the <serviceDebug> configuration behavior) on the server in order to send the exception information back to the client, or turn on tracing as
per the Microsoft .NET Framework SDK documentation and inspect the server trace logs."} . f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.79 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 8nca Medium Application error when access /sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc, Error=The server was unable to process the request due to an internal
error. For more information about the error, either turn on IncludeExceptionDetailInFaults (either from ServiceBehaviorAttribute or from the <serviceDebug> configuration behavior) on the server in order to send the exception information back to
the client, or turn on tracing as per the Microsoft .NET Framework SDK documentation and inspect the server trace logs. at Microsoft.IdentityModel.Protocols.WSTrust.WSTrustChannel.ReadResponse(Message response) at Microsoft.IdentityModel.Protocols.WSTrust.WSTrustChannel.Issue(RequestSecurityToken
rst, RequestSecurityTokenResponse& rstr) at Microsoft.IdentityModel.Protocols.WSTrust.WSTrustChannel.Issue(RequestSecurityToken rst) at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurityContext.SecurityTokenForContext(Uri context,
Boolean bearerToken, SecurityToken onBehalfOf, SecurityToken actAs, SecurityToken delegateTo, SPRequestSecurityTokenProperties properties) at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurityContext.SecurityTokenForApplicationAuthentication(Uri context,
SecurityToken onBehalfOf) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPApplicationAuthenticationModule.<>c__DisplayClass4.<GetLocallyIssuedToken>b__3() at Microsoft.SharePoint.Utilities.SecurityContext.RunAsProcess(CodeToRunElevated
secureCode) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPApplicationAuthenticationModule.ConstructIClaimsPrincipalAndSetThreadIdentity(HttpApplication httpApplication, HttpContext httpContext, SPFederationAuthenticationModule fam)
at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPApplicationAuthenticationModule.AuthenticateRequest(Object sender, EventArgs e) at System.Web.HttpApplication.SyncEventExecutionStep.System.Web.HttpApplication.IExecutionStep.Execute()
at System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStep(IExecutionStep step, Boolean& completedSynchronously) f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.79 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8b Verbose Looking up context site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in the farm SharePoint_Config_QA f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.79 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8d Verbose Looking up the additional information about the typical site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.80 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8f Verbose Site lookup is replacing
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly with the alternate access url
http://inetdev. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.80 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8g Verbose Looking up typical site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.80 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8h Verbose Found typical site /sites/testrpa2 (407ba20c-079b-4b99-9e70-f86e6e13ddde) in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.80 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8b Verbose Looking up context site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in the farm SharePoint_Config_QA f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.80 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8d Verbose Looking up the additional information about the typical site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.80 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8f Verbose Site lookup is replacing
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly with the alternate access url
http://inetdev. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.80 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8g Verbose Looking up typical site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.80 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8h Verbose Found typical site /sites/testrpa2 (407ba20c-079b-4b99-9e70-f86e6e13ddde) in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.80 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation Monitoring b4ly Medium Leaving Monitored Scope (Request (GET:http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly)). Execution Time=62.2890618779761 f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
Regards
Sakti -
Welcome to the Design and Architecture Community
Welcome to the Network Infrastructure Design and Architecture Community. We encourage everyone to share their knowledge and start conversations on design and overall network topology. All topics are welcome, including requirements and constraints of the network, tools and techniques, issues of hierarchy, leading practices, services, build strategies, architectures and solutions to solve business problems.
Remember, just like in the workplace, be courteous to your fellow forum participants. Please refrain from using disparaging or obscene language or posting advertisements.
Cheers,
Dan BruhnCSC Community Managerbeen waiting to see a forum like this. This forum should amalgamate all the other areas like R&S, security, DC design, and provide more quality , proven solns and discuss problems/challenges as well. Will be following this forum regularly
thanks dan for creating this community
Regards Kishore -
Hi guys........just have few qestions about designing WLC 5508
The scenario is that currently one of the client has a firewall Tiering T1 internet facing and T2 internal whioch has multiple DMZ connected.
T2 firewall has a DMZ switch connected which has a router which connects to MPLS cloud to different site across the country. (around 10 sites) all static routing.
Now the client is thinking to deploy wireless at all 10 sites using H-REAP. The issue is that client has only one WLC and they are not willing to buy other as i was thinking to deploy two WLC one for corporate and one for guest users. (one in internal network and on in DMZ)
Now my question is as follwow.
1- Keeping in mind that there is only one WLC where should i physically put it?
2- How guest users will work ? How the authentication will be done?
3-There are 8 SFP ports in WLC how physical topology will look like?
4-How many Vlans i have to make for wirless users will that be 10? (1 at each site) ?
my last question is that how these ports work on WLC are they just like swicth e.g one port can be assigned to different vlan....just confuse about interfaces and vlans on WLC (interfces concept)
Thanks guy and hope to get a response ASAP.1- Keeping in mind that there is only one WLC where should i physically put it?
Well since you will also be supporting Corporate and I'm guessing that is where the WLC sites, it should be in the inside network. You would just need to allow udp 5246 & 5247
2- How guest users will work ? How the authentication will be done?
Guest users can use webauth in which the credentials will be stored on the WLC.
3-There are 8 SFP ports in WLC how physical topology will look like?
This is the tricky part. You can either lag or not lag. You can't split up the lag (etherchannel). So you can either use all 8 if you with and create an etherchannel and then acl the guest traffic out the internet or you can put the guest on a layer 2 vlan in which you would connect that out to the dmz. Or you can use one port for the management and also have a backup port, one for your internal wireless and also have a backup port and the same for guest. SO it would look like this:
Management primary port 1 backup port 2
SSID primary port 3 backup port 4
Guest primary port 5 guest port 6
OR
Management & SSID's primary port 1 backup port 2
Guest primary port 3 guest port 4
4-How many Vlans i have to make for wireless users will that be 10? (1 at each site) ?
If you use local switching which I would think you would, the vlans for the SSID at the remote site will be created locally at each remote site. If you want to centrally switch, means all traffic will come back to the WLC, then you will need at least one. Now you can use a large subnet or have a subnet for each site, its up to you. You would use AP Groups for that.
my last question is that how these ports work on WLC are they just like switch e.g one port can be assigned to different vlan....just confuse about interfaces and vlans on WLC (interface concept)
Thanks,
Scott
Help out other by using the rating system and marking answered questions as "Answered" -
Hi guys........just have few qestions about designing WLC 5508
The scenario is that currently one of the client has a firewall Tiering T1 internet facing and T2 internal whioch has multiple DMZ connected.
T2 firewall has a DMZ switch connected which has a router which connects to MPLS cloud to different site across the country. (around 10 sites) all static routing.
Now the client is thinking to deploy wireless at all 10 sites using H-REAP. The issue is that client has only one WLC and they are not willing to buy other as i was thinking to deploy two WLC one for corporate and one for guest users. (one in internal network and on in DMZ)
Now my question is as follwow.
1- Keeping in mind that there is only one WLC where should i physically put it?
2- How guest users will work ? How the authentication will be done?
3-There are 8 SFP ports in WLC how physical topology will look like?
4-How many Vlans i have to make for wirless users will that be 10? (1 at each site) ?
my last question is that how these ports work on WLC are they just like swicth e.g one port can be assigned to different vlan....just confuse about interfaces and vlans on WLC (interfces concept)
Thanks guy and hope to get a response ASAP.OSITAN N Many thanks please comment
Internet
FW 1
! <---------------------Traffic comming this way
FW2--------DMZ--------------SW---------- Router -----------------IP MPLS-----------------
------Trusted----- ! !
! ------Branch Router-------> RT
! ! ! SW
DSN AD DHCP !
AP
USER
1 Where WLC Place so that Guest trafice dont go to Trusted area?
2. Its gona be H-Reap so DHCP would be local for branch
3. Voce user Qos? priority how ? example
4 Guest Firewall rules to use only internet ? -
Ask the Expert: Hierarchical Network Design, Includes Core, Distribution, and Access
Welcome to the Cisco® Support Community Ask the Expert conversation. This is an opportunity to learn and ask questions about hierarchical network design.
Recommending a network topology is required for meeting a customer's corporate network design needs in their business and technical goals and often consists of many interrelated components. The hierarchical design made this easier like "divide and conquer" the job and develop the design in layers.
Network design experts have developed the hierarchical network design model to help to develop a topology in discrete layers. Each layer can be focused on specific functions, to select the right systems and features for the layer.
A typical hierarchical topology is
A core layer of high-end routers and switches that are optimized for availability and performance.
A distribution layer of routers and switches that implement policies.
An access layer that connects users via lower-end switches and wireless access points.
Ahmad Manzoor is a Senior Pre-Sales Engineer at AGCN, Pakistan. He has more than 10 years of experience in first-rate management, commercial and technical skills in the field of data communication and services lifecycle—from solution design through sales pitch, designing RFPs, architecture, and solution—all with the goal toward winning projects (creating win/win situations) of obsolete solutions. Ahmad also has vast experience in designing end-to-end data centers, from building infrastructure design to data communication and network Infrastructure design. He has worked for several large companies in Pakistan and United Arab Emirates markets; for example, National Engineer, WATEEN Telecom, Emircom, Infotech, Global Solutions, NETS International, Al-Aberah, and AGCN, also known as Getronics, Pakistan.
Remember to use the rating system to let Ahmad know if he has given you an adequate response.
Because of the volume expected during this event, Ahmad might not be able to answer every question. Remember that you can continue the conversation in the Solutions and Architectures under the sub-community Data Center & Virtualization, shortly after the event. This event lasts through August 15, 2014. Visit this forum often to view responses to your questions and the questions of other Cisco Support Community members.Dear Leo,
We are discussing the following without any product line, discussing the concept of hierarchical design, which will help you to take decision which model is better for you Two Layer or Three Layer hierarchical model.
Two-Layer Hierarchy
In many networks, you need only two layers to fulfill all of the layer functions—core and aggregation
Only one zone exists within the core, and many zones are in the aggregation layer. Examine each of the layer functions to see where it occurs in a two-layer design:
Traffic forwarding—Ideally, all interzone traffic forwarding occurs in the core. Traffic flows from each zone within the aggregation layer up the hierarchy into the network core and then back down the hierarchy into other aggregation zones.
Aggregation—Aggregation occurs along the core/aggregation layer border, allowing only interzone traffic to pass between the aggregation and core layers. This also provides an edge for traffic engineering services to be deployed along.
Routing policy—Routing policy is deployed along the edge of the core and the aggregation layers, generally as routes are advertised from the aggregation layer into the core.
User attachment—User devices and servers are attached to zones within the aggregation layer. This separation of end devices into the aggregation permits the separation of traffic between traffic through a link and traffic to a link, or device. Typically, it is best not to mix transit and destination traffic in the same area of the network.
Controlling traffic admittance—Traffic admittance control always occurs where user and server devices are attached to the network, which is in the aggregation layer. You can also place traffic admittance controls at the aggregation points exiting from the aggregation layer into the core of the network, but this is not common.
You can see, then, how dividing the network into layers enables you to make each layer specialized and to hide information between the layers. For instance, the traffic admittance policy implemented along the edge of the aggregation layer is entirely hidden from the network core.
You also use the core/aggregation layer edge to hide information about the topology of routing zones from each other, through summarization. Each zone within the aggregation layer should have minimal routing information, possibly just how to make it to the network core through a default route, and no information about the topology of the network core. At the same time, the zones within the aggregation layer should summarize their reachability information into as few routing advertisements as possible at their edge with the core and hide their topology information from the network core.
Three-Layer Hierarchy
A three-layer hierarchy divides these same responsibilities through zones in three vertical network layers,
Traffic Forwarding—As with a two-layer hierarchy, all interzone traffic within a three- layer hierarchy should flow up the hierarchy, through the layers, and back down the hierarchy.
Aggregation—A three-layer hierarchy has two aggregation points:
At the edge of the access layer going into the distribution layer
At the edge of the distribution layer going into the core
At the edge of the access layer, you aggregate traffic in two places: within each access zone and flowing into the distribution layer. In the same way, you aggregate interzone traffic at the distribution layer and traffic leaving the distribution layer toward the network core. The distribution layer and core are ideal places to deploy traffic engineering within a network.
Routing policy—The routing policy is deployed within the distribution layer in a three- layer design and along the distribution/core edge. You can also deploy routing policies along the access/distribution edge, particularly route and topology summarization, to hide information from other zones that are attached to the same distribution layer zone.
User attachment—User devices and servers are attached to zones within the access layer. This separation of end devices into the access layer permits the separation of traffic between traffic through a link and traffic to a link, or device. Typically, you do not want to mix transit and destination traffic in the same area of the network.
Controlling traffic admittance—Traffic admittance control always occurs where user and server devices are attached to the network, which is in the access layer. You can also place traffic admittance controls at the aggregation points along the aggregation/core edge.
As you can see, the concepts that are applied to two- and three-layer designs are similar, but you have more application points in a three-layer design.
Now the confusion takes place in our minds where do we use Two Layer and where the Three layer hierarchical model.
Now we are discussing that How Many Layers to Use in Network Design?
Which network design is better: two layers or three layers? As with almost all things in network design, it all depends. Examine some of the following factors involved in deciding whether to build a two- or three-layer network:
Network geography—Networks that cover a smaller geographic space, such as a single campus or a small number of interconnected campuses, tend to work well as two-layer designs. Networks spanning large geographic areas, such as a country, continent, or even the entire globe, often work better as three layer designs.
Network topology depth—Networks with a compressed, or flattened, topology tend to work better as two-layer hierarchies. For instance, service provider networks cover large geographic areas, but reducing number of hops through the network is critical in providing the services they sell; therefore, they are often built on a two-layer design. Networks with substantial depth in their topologies, however, tend to work better as three-layer designs.
Network topology design—Highly meshed networks, with many requirements for interzone traffic flows, tend to work better as two-layer designs. Simplifying the hierarchy to two levels tends to focus the design elements into meshier zones. Networks that focus traffic flows on well-placed distributed resources, or centralized resources, such as a network with a large number of remote sites connecting to a number of centralized Data Centers, tend to work better as three-layer designs.
Policy implementation—If policies of a network tend to focus on traffic engineering, two-layer designs tend to work better. Networks that attempt to limit access to resources attached to the network and other types of policies tend to work better as three-layer designs.
Again, however, these are simple rules of thumb. No definitive way exists to decide whether a network should have two or three layers. Likewise, you cannot point to a single factor and say, “Because of this, the network we are working on should have three layers instead of two.”
I hope that this helps you to understand the purposes of Two Layer & Three layer Hierarchical Model.
Best regards,
Ahmad Manzoor -
Hey all, we are upgrading to a Cisco network and wanted some input on our possible network design...
Currently we have:
A Juniper SSG 140 and IDP for our firewall and IDS
3com (layer2/3) switches for our desktops
2 Dell PowerConnect 5424 switches for our servers and firewalls
2 Dell PowerConnect 5424 switches (separate network) for our SAN/VM hosts
This is what we are thinking of for our next solution
ASA 5512 for our firewall (I read we could possibly get a 25% performance speed improvement for user VPN connections?)
2 WS-C3750x-48t-e (I think this does Layer 2/3) for our desktops
2 WS-C3750x-48t-e for our firewalls/servers
2 WS-C3750x-24P-L for our SAN/VM hosts
The problem is different network services providers who are going to implement this for us are giving us different solutions
Some desktop 3560X for desktops and 4948 for servers and others are telling me 3750x for desktops and Nexus 3048 switches for SAN
Some are telling me we can keep SAN+VM+core traffic on the same switches and just separate them with VLANs while others are telling me we should get separate switches for them
Basically, we just want a improved improvement with better PERFORMANCE and REDUNDANCY (esp with our core + SAN/VM traffic) without going overboard and spending a ton of money
More thoughts:
We need Layer 2/3 switches for core + SAN
Do we need 10G ports?
Let me know your thoughts...Hi There,
the hardware selection actually depends on the network/site topology, number of users, traffic load and more other factors
this is for IP network, for SAN do you mean iscsi, FCoE or pure FC SAN because these are different things and may change the HW selection,
in general 3560 are good fro access switches and 3750 provide same capabilities with improved performance and support for swtckwise ( 3750 is a good option especially if you planing to stack them )
for L3 it is supported on both but consider the license/image you buy with regard to the features you need
nexus for Data center switch are the best as they are design for data center switching however you need to know, port density, 1G or 10G, do you need any FC SAN, DC load/capacity, any L3 function is required and future growth then you can decide if Nexus 3K or 5K is good for you or not
N5K
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps9441/ps9670/data_sheet_c78-618603.html
N3K
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps9441/ps11541/at_a_glance_c45-648255.pdf
if yo have a network topology with more details of what you need, post it here for more discussions
hope this help
if helpful rate -
Using "File" as the technology in ODI Designer to populate dimensions
Hello John (John Goodwin)
I am currently following your blog on "ODI series 4 - Enter the Designer" and so far I have been successful with the following:
1) Connecting to the planning application
2) Performing Reverse operation
However, when I create a new model by selecting "File" as the technology, even after selecting "Standard" under the "Reverse" tab and selecting proper context (as created earlier), I am not able to see the "Files" tab as shown in the blog.
I am not able to get to the following "Insert a new DataStore and give it a name and if you click browse for file button it should open up in the correct directory and you can select the csv file." Where do I insert a new Datastore?
Without this option I am not able to move forward. I would appreciate any help with this.
Thanks,
DattaHi,
First of all have you set up the physical schema for the File technology in the topology manager, adding the context and logical schema name.
Next in the designer you will need to Insert Model using the file technology and the logical schema that was created in the topology manager.
Now you can right click the Model and insert Datastore, you should be able to click the Resource Name, select the file and carry on from there.
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/ -
I'm guessing not many people here are involved with small batch design and construction of harnesses.
On the last J1939 250 kbps automotive harness design that went out the manufacturer substituted some Deutsch junction connectors which effectively turned the bus into a star. Arm lengths were also pretty bad: 13, 19, 37, 108, and 120", and 60" to a connector that joins another harness under our customer's design control. Presumably that one will have several nodes and a terminating resistor. Adding to the difficulty is that the 19" arm is to an ECU with built in 60 ohm resistor, and the 13" arm also has a node with built in resistor, which was developed with the understanding that the resistor was optional, which hasn't been the case just yet.
I complained a bit, and came up with a compromise design that does some doubling back inside the harness to maintain a decent bus topology. Now it has the terminated ECU at one bus end, 30" stub, 4" branch to the other terminated node, 60" branch, 101" branch and then connector to customer's harness. Lengths between the branches range from 12" to 30", plus at least 50" for the customer connection. Not super thrilled about the remaining branch lengths, but it's better. With some more cajoling we could maybe double back and cut that 101" down. The 60" branch is not going to get shorter, as that would require 2 trips through a cannon connector. All of this is run through shielded twisted pair wiring, bound up with the general wiring (24 and 12 VDC primarily).
Sorry for the long setup. Functional questions:
-barring rigorous testing, how detrimental are the long stub and branches, and the superfluous terminated node?
-any suggestions on making junctions for each branch? In and out of the shielded twisted wire each time is quite a roadblock for small scale manufacturing, especially to keep single end connection for the shield intact.
-is it worth looking into other robustness measures, such as split termination? That is assuming we ever have that opportunity.
Deutsch would love for us to go full tilt on their 3 pin setup, but that's as unlikely as a standalone CAN bus harness. I went through the TI CAN bus document here: http://www.ti.com/lit/an/slla270/slla270.pdf and have a slightly better understanding of the technical reasons for following the specifications. Nothing I can really point to as signal of doom however.
Thanks,
MarkThe routing of a CAN a bus and it's wires can be a difficult thing. On the surface it is easy, just follow the approved design spec for CAN which as a summary is the following:
Create a bus which is linear where nodes attach to the bus, and no node is farther than 15cm away from the bus.
Attatch a 120ohm resistor between CAN high and low on the first and the last node of the bus.
Does a CAN bus suddently fall appart if these recommendations aren't followed? Not always. These requirements are to help shield against noise and reflection on the lines. If you are in an environment with no noise, then maybe you don't need to follow these rules so closly.
We make testers were we can test up to 12 devices at once. Some times we are forced to put all of these devices on one CAN bus, leading to high bus load over 90% at 500K baud. Each UUT gets its own 10 foot harness. So this means we may have 12 nodes, each with a 10 foot harness, going to a single point where the CAN port is. In this design we only have one terminating resistor and it is at the CAN port of the tester. So we broke both of the CAN spec rules. But in our test environment, which deal with 480VAC power supplies, shaker tables, and environmental conditions with humidity and temperature, we didn't have a problem. But I was very nervious about the design choices made by others, until we had lots of data showing the robustness.
For us there wasn't much alternative. Either have 12 different CAN ports, which increase cost and system complexity, or we could have extra wires so the CAN bus would go out and come back from each UUT which would mean more cost in harnesses, and it would mean all harnesses need to be connected, even when a UUT isn't to complete the bus.
Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines - Hooovahh - LabVIEW Overlord
If 10 out of 10 experts in any field say something is bad, you should probably take their opinion seriously. -
Layer 3 to the Access Layer and MPLS Design Considerations
Hi,
We are about to install a new network consisting of Cat 4500s with Sup7E at the Access Layer, with Nexus 7000 at the Distribution and Core layers.
We have 14 floors with at least three 4500s on each floor. Within the office block where the Access Layer and Distribution Layer reside we need to support secure borderless networking using 802.1x to place users from different parts of the business into segregated networks at layer 3.
All switches will have the feature sets to support MPLS/ VRF / OSPF / EIGRP / BGP etc.
We quickly dismissed the idea of using VRF-Lite due to the sheer number of Vlans we would need to managage and maintain, the point to point links alone just to get one additional VRF on each floor required far too many Vlans.
As a result we are now considering deploying MPLS. The obvious benefits include scalability and manageability, the fact that all switch to switch links can now be routed, instead of having to using SVIs.
My query is one of design surrounding MPLS and how this maps to an enterprise network with a routed access layer. Do Cat 4500s become the CEs and take part in MPLS / BGP and Label Distribution, or does the BGP peering and Label Distribution only occur between the Distrubtion - Core - Distrubtion layers, mapping to the PE - P - PE topology in an ISP environment, the access layer simply uses the IGP (OSPF in this case) to learn routes ?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Chris.Hi Andy,
Thanks for your response.
I have been doing a little bit more research it seems the Cat 4500s do not support MPLS!! Nor do Cisco have any plans to support it on this platform. I find this a little rediculous considering the level that Cisco are pitching this platform. With the Sup 7E only VRF Lite is supported, with plans to support EVN (which still uses trunk links for logical separation).
So it looks like we are going to have to go back to the drawing board.
(perhaps we should have gone HP or Juniper!)
Chris. -
Unable to create the model in designer
Very new to ODI, I have setup the master rep in Oracle 9i database. The working repository is also created there. But I am unable to create a model with Oracle techology as it doesnot give the Logical scema. May I request a solutions for the newbee.
Managed to solve the problem right now..
For new ones who would like to use Oracle 9i as master repository and working repository please check the following steps before continuing.
create the master repository on Oracle 9i database server
Make the agent server running
Launch the topology manager and create a new login for the master rep.
Login to TM.
create the working repository from topology manager. Physical Architecture -> Oracle -> right click -> create data server.
Now login to designer and create the model.
let me explore more and would revert back again.
check again at avisolutions.blogsopt.com
Maybe you are looking for
-
One of my address book birthdays wont show up in iCal
Every birthday I've inputed into my address book appears on my birthdays calendar in iCal, except my father's. A few days ago, I noticed that my father's birthday was listed on the wrong day in iCal, so I opened my address book to check it out, but i
-
Promotion: points collection and free goods
Dear experts, our Sales Dept. is going to propose special promotions based on points collection. For example, each time a customer orders 100 PCS he is awarded with 1 point. At the end of the promotion validity period, he gets the right to receive a
-
I just upgraded my 2008 macbook pro to OS X Maverick from Snow Leopard but my computer is running a bit buggy and slow. How do I downgrade back down to snow leopard?
-
How do I deactivate Creative Cloud 2014 Photoshop and Adobe Bridge software on one computer in order to install it into another newer computer? I looked on the Help and it did not help me answer this question.
-
How to add a computer to the newtwork
How do I add other computers to the WIFI network?