Detect if Time Stamp control user dialog has been pressed

Hi,
I have to make some changes to my project. I can't modify existing program blocks, so I must figure out a way to detect if user has pressed user dialog icon for setting up time (control type is Time Stamp). I now I can compare current values with the values from previous loop pass, but that is not a option.
I'm looking for some kind of property node like active control or something similar.
Message Edited by _thomas on 10-31-2009 07:19 AM
Solved!
Go to Solution.
Attachments:
Timestamp user dialog icon.JPG ‏3 KB

There isn't. You can create your own time stamp control (like an XControl), or you can simply monitor to see if the window appears. You can do the latter using the VI Server functions or you can use the operating system API. For Windows you can use the LabVIEW Windows Utilities library.

Similar Messages

Time stamp control dialog kills System Exec.vi !

Hello!
I just experiance a really strange behaviour in my application. I managed to reduce it to a much smaller VI, please do not look at the framework but at the actual problem, this test MAIN vi looks like this since it is a skeleton of a bigger application (i had to remove many non-relevant and confidential parts).
So. I have a USB watchdog relay from a 3rd party company, which I can use perfectly in my application via a supplied EXE. I call this exe from LabVIEW using the System Exec.vi , and it works perfectly and the Watchdog functions as it should. However I see a strange bug (?): if I launch a Time stamp control dialog browser window, it "pauses" somehow the System Exec.vi. So my watchdog command setting stops, relay opens, problem!
I zipped my test application and I can reproduce this same problem even if I just call a command line PAUSE win command. Note that, in my real application, the Time stamp control is located in a separate, dynamically callled (call and forget method) VI, but I get the same bug!!!
Steps to reproduce the bug:
start my application
observe as the bottom loop iterates
Click on the Time Stamp control's browser to pop-up the dialog window.
You can see the iteration of the bottom loop stopped (DAQ loop iterations)
if you close the dialog window, the bottom loop continues execution
What the heck is this???
How is this possible, why there is "interference" between a totally separated control and a bottom loop System Exec.vi ???
Thanks for any suggestion!
In my real app, as a workaround, I just hide the browser element of the Time stamp control...
Solved!
Go to Solution.
Attachments:
HYDE_loop_software.zip ‏348 KB

Thanks! Yep, I can do a workaround, like create my own time stamp dialog window to pop-up if i wanna be "fancy".
But this is important to keep in mind, if we use the SystemExec vi!
If someone can explane this issue/feature deeper, I will be happy, but I mark this above post as solution, thanks!

Time stamp control

I am using the Time stamp control to allow a user to enter a date easily. How do I convert the time stamp data to a string?
Using V7.1 on Win2000.
thanks.

Greg,
Use the "Format Date/Time String" function from the Time & Dialog palette. You can either stick to the default output format, or you can produce an arbitrary date/time format by wiring in a format string of your own (see the help). For example, "%I:%M:%S %m/%d/%y" would produce an output like "00:14:41 01/29/04".
--John

Why does Time Stamp Control not produce a Absolute Time output?

I have used the the Time Stamp Control for manual input of measurement information. However, this control produce a time stamp in relative time which is unwanted. I thought that Time Stamps always are in Absolute Time. Is this not true? The control is very handy for time and date inputs. Is there a way of changing the output to relative time?

I will try to be more specific:
There is a Time Stamp Control available in the controls palette for use on the front panel. This can be used to set a variable called Time Stamp with values of time and date. It has a time and date browser which is very convenient to use and I like to use it. The time format I prefer in this case is Absolute Time which is time-zone-independent and it is the number of seconds elapsed since 12:00 a. m., Friday 1, 1904, Universal time according to LabVIEW help. However, the output from the Time Stamp Control is in Relative Time which I think is the Absolute Time compensated with Dayligth Saving Time and the local Time zone setting in your system.
Time Stamps are always in Absolute Time I think but not in this case.
My problem may be solved with a VI similar to "Format Date/Time String Function" but with a time stamp input and output, since this VI converts from Absolute time to Relative time. Even better is of course having a Time Stamp Control where you can select between absolute and relative time.

Guys, every time I download app on iPhone, i get message that "your user id has been disabled''

guys, every time I download app on iPhone, i get message that "your user id has been disabled'

That is exactly what happened to me! I wrote to Apple and they informed me that my account had been disabled because somebody had made a complaint that their credit card had been used to buy stuff on my account without their consent thus my account was disabled and it was a permanant thing. They suggested I set up a new Id, explained I could still use my apps but would not be able to update them. I wrote back to them explaining that there was no way I would have done such a thing, that I felt that I was being penalised over something I had not control over and I had bought my apps in good faith expecting to be able to update them as required. I also pointed out that a little while ago I found that my account had suddenly changed to a USA based one so that I had reset it and the password along with the credit card attached to it. I didn't really think much about it but now I wonder if I had been hacked.
I did get a very nice email back saying that they would investigate but having waited a few days I just got an email from a supervisor saying they had closed the account, there would be no further information given and I could look at their terms and conditions. I haven't been even been told what apps were supposedly bought through my account to see if there has been a genuine mix-up with credit cards through the banking system. I feel somewhat besmirched by the whole affair; I would never do anything illegal or misuse my account but despite being a loyal Apple customer who has promoted their products at every given opportunity, both professionally and socially, I have been summararily dismissed without being given the chance to defend myself or my reputation.

Can't show 7PM with Time Stamp Control

Maybe it's just me, but I can't seem to get any time stamp controls to accept 7PM as an entry.
....this is kind of a problem for the data entry I'm supposed to be doing this weekend.
Any workaround?
Patrick Allen

Thanks for the reply Guenter.
It's very strange. Even after shutting down LabVIEW and starting with an entirely new VI, the time stamp control always displays 00:00:00 when I try to enter 7PM.
I've tried changing the defaults to just about everything. But it's always the same behavior.
For my work around I decided to just use Excel for all my raw data entry. I'll write program to stuff it all in the database later.
*edit*
I just downloaded the attachment on your reply.....and it worked just fine.
I'm uploading the entire .vi now. This is bizare.
Message Edited by pallen on 10-03-2009 05:44 PM
Patrick Allen
Attachments:
time stamp weirdness.vi ‏6 KB

GetSelectedFields() for time stamp and user stamp using java api

using Java API's
getSelectedFields() returns NULL value if values presented also, for Time stamp and User stamp
properties in Flat tables , is there any other alternative way to get the SelectedFields values ?
Edited by: Vijaya Sekhar Reddy Alla on Mar 19, 2008 3:16 PM

Well, I can't say I solved the problem, because I got another one afterwards.
As usually I created a GetFieldListCommand, set its needed attributes and executed it. Then I read all the field properties out:
FieldProperties[] fieldProp = getFieldListCommand.getFields();
Afterwards it is possible to do what you want. Using a for-loop.
for (FieldProperties fp : fieldProperties) {
UserStampFieldProperties usfp = (UserStampFieldProperties) fp; // <= Cast error
FieldId[] fieldIDs = usfp.getSelectedFields();
And this is what I get now:
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ClassCastException: com.sap.mdm.schema.fields.FixedWidthTextFieldProperties cannot be cast to com.sap.mdm.schema.fields.UserStampFieldProperties
Why this happens, I don't know. But it should somehow be solveable.

Solution - Battery error is detected. Irreparable damage to the battery has been detected. Replace

I own a T61 7658 I bough on 2008, it worked great with the default power settings until October 22nd I decided to change my power profile to MAXIMUM PERFORMANCE.
Next day I received on Message Center...
10/23/2010 - Battery health is critical. With the current system settings and a full charge, your battery can provide approximately 3.0 hours of use. A new battery could provide up to an estimated 5.5 hours.
I kept using the Laptop with the Max performance until...
11/12/2010 - Battery error is detected. Irreparable damage to the battery has been detected. Replace the battery with a new one.
I have used IBM/Lenovo for years and even had used batteries for 5 years without a single issue.
I have read many posts of people having the same problem not only with T61s, but many other Lenovo models, and also read posts of Lenovo's administrators suggesting this is normal and justifying that batteries should be good for at least 12 months and after that we are on own, basically meaning we should be thankful in name of our own safety that we had that battery protection and we must replace it at our own cost and forget about it. That is a very easy way out, isn’t it.
But certainly, not only batteries with more than 12 months are failing, even new batteries are and have been replaced with multiple exchange programs posted by Lenovo in their website just as in http://download.lenovo.com/lenovo/content/batt/082009/LandingPage.html. and also in multiple MIGR battery replacement campaigns available to all online as well.
Good thing here is that Lenovo has recognized the problem and has exchange the batteries still under warranty and also few of the batteries without warranty limiting to some serial numbers on the MIGR battery replacement campaigns, but the bad side is that Lenovo is leaving behind other clients like me and many others not being selected for replacement. But I’m sure we all have a good battery but turned useless due to the Lenovo programmed safety temperature limits in the power manager and the battery board. Please let me explain.
This is my conclusion. There is nothing wrong with used or new batteries or their cells in 99% of the cases, I'm sure my battery is okay although is being turned useless by the battery protection feature on my T61.
Lenovo must recognize the problem is the settings they have programmed on the power manager and battery protection board. It is very understandable that when users select a Power Scheme that demands higher amounts of power to generate better performance on the system this also demand additional power generating heat on battery and on the power supply as the computer is running at full performance, just as happens on my ipod when watching video, or in my kid’s R/C truck when running continuously and will happen with any other battery powered device.
Therefore any scheme requiring performance is generating heat and is tripping the battery protection and this is not a client’s fault, as are we just using an available scheme provided on our Lenovo system. If the battery protection is not calibrated to support this power demand, then there is a poor design/testing of the capabilities of the system and the battery protection parameters that instruct the battery to save itself from a fire or burning … which is understandable.
The bad side is that there is not possible reset option for the end users, the only option is to buy a new battery at our own cost after the 12 months of warranty, when the cause of the problem is originated in the computer system design settings and can happen at any time, that is way, the system warned me, as in:
10/23/2010 - Battery health is critical. With the current system settings and a full charge, your battery can provide approximately 3.0 hours of use. A new battery could provide up to an estimated 5.5 hours.
The computer is saying! At maximum performance, You are using too much power, and my battery will last just 3 hrs (9 cells on my system) instead of the 5.5 hrs that should last. But not only the running time was reduced, the heat on the power supply system and Battery was also increased due to the higher power demand, the battery can not handle the demand and protect itself to prevent fire or damage.
So who has to pay for this? Can Lenovo do something about it? For us client and for future clients? This not a matter of having or not having warranty, this can happen at any time in any computer.
I'm writing this hoping to be heard and supported and I hope LENOVO provides a satisfactory solution to the issue. I'm not going to say will never buy Lenovo again I already did, I invested my money on Lenovo and with warranty or not I'm looking forward to get a decent response.
Lenovo must change the parameters for tripping battery protection probably handled at BIOS level, and to provide a reset feature to all "locked" batteries there is many people that has lost at least one battery, some other more than that.  Since even if we get a replacement, the chances  the issue will continue is there, as long as I select a high power demand scheme the problem sooner or later will be back.   Even car makers support their clients beyond the warranty if they detect that the issue compromises safety and their reputation.  Fix it.
M.Padron.

amtho, welcome to the forum,
start by looking at this site and also look at this site which is actually linked to from the first one.
Hope this helps
Andy ______________________________________
Please remember to come back and mark the post that you feel solved your question as the solution, it earns the member + points
Did you find a post helpfull? You can thank the member by clicking on the star to the left awarding them Kudos Please add your type, model number and OS to your signature, it helps to help you. Forum Search Option T430 2347-G7U W8 x64, Yoga 10 HD+, Tablet 1838-2BG, T61p 6460-67G W7 x64, T43p 2668-G2G XP, T23 2647-9LG XP, plus a few more. FYI Unsolicited Personal Messages will be ignored.
Deutsche Community Comunidad en Español English Community Русскоязычное Сообщество
PepperonI blog

How can I check how many times or when an app has been re-downloaded on my iphone

How can I check how many times or when an app has been re-downloaded on my iphone. I know how to check purchases but I am looking for how to check when an app had been re-downloaded on my device whether it's through my device or Apple ID

You mention "lack of control" several times. The control is there - you control the Apple ID and password that owns the app. No other Apple ID can use the app. You have not shared your Apple ID or password with anyone, so you and only you own the app.
Therefore, the number of times the app is downloaded or re-downloaded is completely irrelevant. You might, for example, decide to purchase a new iPhone or iPad and download the app there. Or the app developer may issue a new version which you download. None of this matters regarding your "control" of the app. All that matters is that you own it and nobody else can use it.

The action (restore User State) has been skipped because the condition is evaluated to be false.

Hello,
At one time my OSD Task Sequence captured network settings and User state (documents, settings, etc) from a refreshed system (same pc), but now it doesn't. In Task sequence I am getting "The action (restore User State) has been skipped because
the condition is evaluated to be false."
==============================[ OSDSetupHook.exe ]============================== OSDSetupHook 3/31/2015 8:55:47 AM 1288 (0x0508)
Executing task sequence OSDSetupHook 3/31/2015 8:55:47 AM 1288 (0x0508)
Loading the Task Sequencing Environment from "C:\_SMSTaskSequence\TSEnv.dat". OSDSetupHook 3/31/2015 8:55:47 AM 1288 (0x0508)
Environment scope successfully created: Global\{51A016B6-F0DE-4752-B97C-54E6F386A912} OSDSetupHook 3/31/2015 8:55:47 AM 1288 (0x0508)
Environment scope successfully created: Global\{BA3A3900-CA6D-4ac1-8C28-5073AFC22B03} OSDSetupHook 3/31/2015 8:55:47 AM 1288 (0x0508)
Debug shell is enabled OSDSetupHook 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1288 (0x0508)
Successfully enabled debug command shell support. OSDSetupHook 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1288 (0x0508)
Configuring local administrator account OSDSetupHook 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1288 (0x0508)
Re-assign all drive letters... OSDSetupHook 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1288 (0x0508)
The drive information which has no drive letter can not be found. No need to re-assign driver letters. OSDSetupHook 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1288 (0x0508)
Installing SMS client OSDSetupHook 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1288 (0x0508)
Client already installed. OSDSetupHook 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1288 (0x0508)
Moving logs to SMS client directory OSDSetupHook 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1288 (0x0508)
Successfully moved logs to SMS client log directory: C:\WINDOWS\CCM\Logs\SMSTSLog OSDSetupHook 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1288 (0x0508)
Executing task sequence manager bootstrap OSDSetupHook 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1288 (0x0508)
Executing command line: "C:\WINDOWS\CCM\TSMBootstrap.exe" /env:Gina /configpath:C:\_SMSTaskSequence /bootcount:6 OSDSetupHook 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1288 (0x0508)
==============================[ TSMBootStrap.exe ]============================== TSMBootstrap 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1976 (0x07B8)
Command line: "C:\WINDOWS\CCM\TSMBootstrap.exe" /env:Gina /configpath:C:\_SMSTaskSequence /bootcount:6 TSMBootstrap 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1976 (0x07B8)
Current OS version is 6.1.7601.1 TSMBootstrap 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1976 (0x07B8)
Logging successfully initialized. TSMBootstrap 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1976 (0x07B8)
Resuming Task Sequence in Full OS TSMBootstrap 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1976 (0x07B8)
We are going in GINA and potentially need to set the authenticator TSMBootstrap 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1976 (0x07B8)
Executing command line: "C:\WINDOWS\CCM\TsProgressUI.exe" /Register:WinPE TSMBootstrap 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1976 (0x07B8)
==========[ TsProgressUI started in process 1952 ]========== TsProgressUI 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 2016 (0x07E0)
Command line: "C:\WINDOWS\CCM\TsProgressUI.exe" /Register:WinPE TsProgressUI 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 2016 (0x07E0)
Registering COM classes TsProgressUI 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 2016 (0x07E0)
sbModulePath = C:\WINDOWS\CCM\TsProgressUI.exe TsProgressUI 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 2016 (0x07E0)
Unregistering class objects TsProgressUI 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 2016 (0x07E0)
Shutdown complete. TsProgressUI 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 2016 (0x07E0)
Process completed with exit code 0 TSMBootstrap 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1976 (0x07B8)
Successfully registered TS Progress UI. TSMBootstrap 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1976 (0x07B8)
Found network adapter "Intel(R) Dual Band Wireless-AC 7260" with IP Address 0.0.0.0. TSMBootstrap 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1976 (0x07B8)
Found network adapter "Intel(R) Ethernet Connection I218-LM" with IP Address 169.254.45.132. TSMBootstrap 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1976 (0x07B8)
Starting Task Sequence Manager. TSMBootstrap 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1976 (0x07B8)
executing TS Manager not in full media TSMBootstrap 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1976 (0x07B8)
executing TS Manager in c:\windows\ccm TSMBootstrap 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1976 (0x07B8)
Executing command line: "TsManager.exe" TSMBootstrap 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1976 (0x07B8)
Successfully intialized Logging for TS Manager. TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Commandline: "TsManager.exe" TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
/service parameter found at index: -1 TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
/standalone parameter found at index: -1 TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
/noclient parameter found at index: -1 TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Successfully registered Task Sequencing COM Interface. TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Executing as a standalone exe TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Initializing TS Environment TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Opening Task Sequencing Environment TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Deleting volume ID file C:\_SMSTSVolumeID.7159644d-f741-45d5-ab29-0ad8aa4771ca ... TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
pwszPath && *pwszPath, HRESULT=80070057 (e:\qfe\nts\sms\framework\tscore\resolvesource.cpp,228) TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
pwszPath && *pwszPath, HRESULT=80070057 (e:\qfe\nts\sms\framework\tscore\resolvesource.cpp,228) TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
pwszPath && *pwszPath, HRESULT=80070057 (e:\qfe\nts\sms\framework\tscore\resolvesource.cpp,228) TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
pwszPath && *pwszPath, HRESULT=80070057 (e:\qfe\nts\sms\framework\tscore\resolvesource.cpp,228) TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Path variable OSDisk converted from 28A047320000401F00000000: to C: TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
NOT executing in WinPE TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Compiling Config policy TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Compiling config policies... TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Compiling SysHealthConfig policy... TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Retrieving value from TSEnv for '_SMSTSSysHealthClientConfig' TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
::DecompressBuffer(65536) TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Decompression (zlib) succeeded: original size 684, uncompressed size 4648. TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Instance path = 'CCM_SystemHealthClientConfig.SiteSettingsKey="1"' TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Start to compile TS policy TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Policy complied successfully in WMI 'root\ccm\policy\defaultmachine\requestedconfig' namespace TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
End TS policy compilation TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Compiling SoftUpdConfig policy... TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Retrieving value from TSEnv for '_SMSTSSWUpdateClientConfig' TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
::DecompressBuffer(65536) TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Decompression (zlib) succeeded: original size 1926, uncompressed size 19238. TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Start to compile TS policy TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Policy complied successfully in WMI 'root\ccm\policy\defaultmachine\requestedconfig' namespace TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
End TS policy compilation TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Instance path = 'CCM_SoftwareUpdatesClientConfig.SiteSettingsKey="1"' TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Start to compile TS policy TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Policy complied successfully in WMI 'root\ccm\policy\defaultmachine\requestedconfig' namespace TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
End TS policy compilation TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Start to compile TS policy TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Policy complied successfully in WMI 'root\ccm\policy\defaultmachine\requestedconfig' namespace TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
End TS policy compilation TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Start to compile TS policy TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Policy complied successfully in WMI 'root\ccm\policy\defaultmachine\requestedconfig' namespace TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
End TS policy compilation TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Compiling SoftDistClientConfig policy... TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Retrieving value from TSEnv for '_SMSTSSoftDistClientConfig' TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
::DecompressBuffer(65536) TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Decompression (zlib) succeeded: original size 1331, uncompressed size 13736. TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Instance path = 'CCM_SoftwareDistributionClientConfig.SiteSettingsKey="1"' TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Start to compile TS policy TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Policy complied successfully in WMI 'root\ccm\policy\defaultmachine\requestedconfig' namespace TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
End TS policy compilation TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Compiling NAAConfig policy... TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Retrieving value from TSEnv for '_SMSTSNAAConfigPolicy' TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
::DecompressBuffer(65536) TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Decompression (zlib) succeeded: original size 1026, uncompressed size 6490. TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Instance path = 'CCM_NetworkAccessAccount.SiteSettingsKey="1"' TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Start to compile TS policy TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Policy complied successfully in WMI 'root\ccm\policy\defaultmachine\requestedconfig' namespace TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
End TS policy compilation TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Instance path = 'CCM_NetworkAccessAccount.SiteSettingsKey="1"' TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Start to compile TS policy TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Policy complied successfully in WMI 'root\ccm\policy\defaultmachine\requestedconfig' namespace TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
End TS policy compilation TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Compiling RebootSettingsConfig policy... TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Retrieving value from TSEnv for '_SMSTSRebootSettingsConfigPolicy' TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
::DecompressBuffer(65536) TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Decompression (zlib) succeeded: original size 433, uncompressed size 1554. TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Instance path = 'CCM_RebootSettings.SiteSettingsKey="1"' TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Start to compile TS policy TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Policy complied successfully in WMI 'root\ccm\policy\defaultmachine\requestedconfig' namespace TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
End TS policy compilation TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Compiling AppManClientConfig policy... TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Retrieving value from TSEnv for '_SMSTSAppManClientConfigPolicy' TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
::DecompressBuffer(65536) TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Decompression (zlib) succeeded: original size 983, uncompressed size 6354. TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Instance path = 'CCM_ApplicationManagementClientConfig.SiteSettingsKey="1"' TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Start to compile TS policy TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Failed to find property 'AutoApplyDeployment' in 'CCM_ApplicationManagementClientConfig' class defintion. Error 0x80041002. Default value will be used for this property TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Policy complied successfully in WMI 'root\ccm\policy\defaultmachine\requestedconfig' namespace TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
End TS policy compilation TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Get Install Directory for SMS Client TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Updating settings in \\.\root\ccm\policy\machine\actualconfig TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
RequestedConfig policy instance(s) : 436 TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Locked \\.\ROOT\ccm\policy\machine\RequestedConfig for source SMS:Client:Default:{8864FB91-94EE-4F16-A144-0D82A232049D} successfully TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Namespace: \\.\ROOT\ccm\policy\machine\RequestedConfig, Query: SELECT PolicyID FROM CCM_Policy_Policy5 WHERE (PolicySource = "SMS:Client:Default:{8864FB91-94EE-4F16-A144-0D82A232049D}") AND (PolicyState = "Active") AND (PolicyType = "Machine") TSManager 3/31/2015
8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
There is no ccm_policy_policy instance, skipping addition to realinst map TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Unlocked \\.\ROOT\ccm\policy\machine\RequestedConfig for source SMS:Client:Default:{8864FB91-94EE-4F16-A144-0D82A232049D} successfully TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
RequestedConfig policy instance(s) : 0 TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Locked \\.\ROOT\ccm\policy\machine\RequestedConfig for source SMS:FSC successfully TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Namespace: \\.\ROOT\ccm\policy\machine\RequestedConfig, Query: SELECT PolicyID FROM CCM_Policy_Policy5 WHERE (PolicySource = "SMS:FSC") AND (PolicyState = "Active") AND (PolicyType = "Machine") TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50
AM 1624 (0x0658)
There is no ccm_policy_policy instance, skipping addition to realinst map TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Unlocked \\.\ROOT\ccm\policy\machine\RequestedConfig for source SMS:FSC successfully TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:50 AM 1624 (0x0658)
RequestedConfig policy instance(s) : 0 TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:51 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Locked \\.\ROOT\ccm\policy\machine\RequestedConfig for source CcmPortal successfully TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:51 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Namespace: \\.\ROOT\ccm\policy\machine\RequestedConfig, Query: SELECT PolicyID FROM CCM_Policy_Policy5 WHERE (PolicySource = "CcmPortal") AND (PolicyState = "Active") AND (PolicyType = "Machine") TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:51
AM 1624 (0x0658)
There is no ccm_policy_policy instance, skipping addition to realinst map TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:51 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Unlocked \\.\ROOT\ccm\policy\machine\RequestedConfig for source CcmPortal successfully TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:51 AM 1624 (0x0658)
RequestedConfig policy instance(s) : 0 TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:51 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Locked \\.\ROOT\ccm\policy\machine\RequestedConfig for source Local successfully TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:51 AM 1624 (0x0658)
RequestedConfig policy instance(s) : 9 TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:51 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Unlocked \\.\ROOT\ccm\policy\machine\RequestedConfig for source Local successfully TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:51 AM 1624 (0x0658)
RequestedConfig policy instance(s) : 42 TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:51 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Locked \\.\ROOT\ccm\policy\machine\RequestedConfig for source CcmTaskSequence successfully TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:51 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Namespace: \\.\ROOT\ccm\policy\machine\RequestedConfig, Query: SELECT PolicyID FROM CCM_Policy_Policy5 WHERE (PolicySource = "CcmTaskSequence") AND (PolicyState = "Active") AND (PolicyType = "Machine") TSManager 3/31/2015
8:55:51 AM 1624 (0x0658)
There is no ccm_policy_policy instance, skipping addition to realinst map TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:51 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Unlocked \\.\ROOT\ccm\policy\machine\RequestedConfig for source CcmTaskSequence successfully TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:51 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Total RequestedConfig policy instance(s) : 487 TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:51 AM 1624 (0x0658)
New/Changed ActualConfig policy instance(s) : 0 TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:51 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Policy evaluation initiated TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:51 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Waiting for policy to be compiled in 'root\ccm\policy\machine' namespace TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:51 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Query = 'CCM_SystemHealthClientConfig.SiteSettingsKey="1"' TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:51 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Verified policy for instance path 'CCM_SystemHealthClientConfig.SiteSettingsKey="1"' compiled in 'root\ccm\policy\machine' namespace TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:51 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Query = 'CCM_SoftwareUpdatesClientConfig.SiteSettingsKey="1"' TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:51 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Verified policy for instance path 'CCM_SoftwareUpdatesClientConfig.SiteSettingsKey="1"' compiled in 'root\ccm\policy\machine' namespace TSManager 3/31/2015 8:55:51 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Query = 'CCM_SoftwareDistributionClient
Thanks in Advance,
Mark

You need to determine why USMTLOCAL is being set to "True". . .
It is set to Not Equal to True.
Evaluating a variable condition expression TSManager 3/31/2015 8:56:23 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Variable = OSDStateStorePath TSManager 3/31/2015 8:56:23 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Value = TSManager 3/31/2015 8:56:23 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Operator = exists TSManager 3/31/2015 8:56:23 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Expand a string: exists TSManager 3/31/2015 8:56:23 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Expand a string: OSDStateStorePath TSManager 3/31/2015 8:56:23 AM 1624 (0x0658)
Expand a string: TSManager 3/31/2015 8:56:23 AM 1624 (0x0658)
The variable condition expression is evaluated to be FALSE TSManager 3/31/2015 8:56:23 AM 1624 (0x0658)
The AND expression is evaluated to be FALSE TSManager 3/31/2015 8:56:23 AM 1624 (0x0658)
The action (Restore User State) has been skipped because the condition is evaluated to be false TSManager 3/31/2015 8:56:23 AM 1624 (0x0658)

How during deployment my user id has been checked by J2EE engine

Hi,
If I want to transport my application, Do I need a valid user ID created in J2EE engine UME. If it is, How during deployment my user id has been checked by J2EE engine.
Thanx for your time.
Cheers,
Sam

Hi,
to deploy your application to the J2EE engine you normaly use SDM (Software Deployment Manager). You need a password (no user Id) to deploy via SDM. This password was set up during installation of the Web AS. You can reset this password via SDM command line tool. Have a look at the SDM documentation for details.
SDM uses the deploy service of the J2EE engine to deploy the application. Therefore SDM connects to the J2EE engine via a username and password that are stored in the secure store (Configtool -> Secure Store). This user is normally identical with the administration user. If you change the password of the administrator you also have to change the password in the secure store. Oterwise you cannot deploy via SDM.
Regards Helmut

Account Information Not Recognized: The user account has been disabled.(FW

Hi Expert ,
I'm working with SAP Business Objects 4.0 SP2 patch 5 and SAP Enterpriseportal. I want to use Single Sign On with trusted authentication in enterprise portal. EP administrator has created an infoview in order to be able to connect the portal and BO.
I have configured trusted authentication in BO but when I try to use the infoview from the portal the following error appear:
"Account Information Not Recognized: The user account has been disabled.(FWB 00012) "
the user used in the sap portal is also defined and active in sap BO.
In order to activate SSO in BO I executed the following steps:
1. Log onto the CMC.
2. Went to the Authentication management area.
3. Select the Enterprise option. The "Enterprise" dialog box opens.
4. Scroll down until I see "Trusted Authentication".
4.a. Click Trusted Authentication is enabled.
4.b. Click New Shared Secret.
4.c. Click Download Shared Secret.
5. Selected Update to commit the shared secret.
6. Saved the trustedprincipal.conf file in the boe server in the path:
'D:\Program Files (x86)\SAP BusinessObjects\SAP BusinessObjects
Enterprise XI 4.0\win32_x86'
7. Modified the file 'D:\Program Files (x86)\SAP
BusinessObjects\Tomcat6\webapps\BOE\WEB-INF\config\default\global.properties'
sso.enabled=true
sso.sap.primary=false
trusted.auth.shared.secret=
trusted.auth.user.param=
trusted.auth.user.retrieval=REMOTE_USER
8.Restart Tomcat
Please could anyone help me to resolve the issue?
Thanks in advance for collaboration.
regards
gio'

Hi Giovanni,
The configuration you have wonu2019t work. You have two different web application servers: Netweaver and Tomcat. Your user credentials are only established in one of them: Netweaver. When you configure trusted authentication in Tomcat you have to authenticate the user in this Web Application server. The REMOTE_USER canu2019t pass from one server to another.
You can confirm this capturing your request using Fiddler in your browser.
If you want to configure the integration BI4 into SAP Enterprise portal, you can follow this guide:
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/BOBJ/BI4IntegrationintotheSAPEntreprisePortal+7.0.x
Regards,
Julian

Error : Period dimension 'Period' is missing a Base Time Period member 'Jun' that has been deleted since the last deployment. Base Time Period members cannot be deleted once the dimension is deployed

HI,
I am using V11.1.2.2 Hyperion Planning. I am currently getting an error:
Error : Period dimension 'Period' is missing a Base Time Period member 'Jun' that has been deleted since the last deployment. Base Time Period members cannot be deleted once the dimension is deployed
This is what i got when i tried to add alternate hierarchy to my shared dimension. I tried to delete it and it messed up.
NOw it wont deploy my application.
Can any one suggest.
Thanks in advance
Cheers,
XXX

EPMA!!!!! EPMA!!!!
I'm playing around with it to write a blog post and it is crazy. Only possible workaround (till now i'm not able to figure out a solution to it) is to copy the application and deploy it as a new one. Take copy of all objects (forms, tasklist etc). Delete the corrupted application and rename the new one to old.
Regards
Celvin
http://www.orahyplabs.com

I can't update my apps because Apple User ID has been disables? changed user ID and password for Mac but can't seem to find way to change phone logon?

I can't update the apps on my iphone because user ID defaults to [email protected] and that user ID has been disabled. Can you tell me how to change user ID for apple on my phone?

did your purchased that apps using that email address or apple id? if the answer is yes, you need to contact iTunes to re-enable your apple id.
If not, you can change the sign in account by going to settings>store

Error Message "User account has been deactivated"

Hello, I'm having some issues with some users because when they try to sign on into Cisco Jabber or Webex Communicator the next error message is shown "User account has been deactivated". I was checking their Active Directory account and have no issues, everything works fine. If any of these users try to SSO on a different computer the same message appears, so I can discard a problem with the app, maybe we have to check something on the server but I don't know where to start or what can I do to solve and prevent future issues. I'm from technical support but if something has to be checked on the server I can involve the administrator.
Thanks in advance, I'll be waiting for your answer.

Hi obimaukenobi,
just to double check ...
You are having this problem with only part of your users, am I correct?
Are you trying to SSO "users with problems" on a computer that works with some users?

Detect if Time Stamp control user dialog has been pressed

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for