DGCserver messages in log... "Tried to renew lease on lost reference"

Hi,
 I am running weblogic server 6.1 and get the following messages
 ####<Jan 30, 2002 2:36:55 PM CST> <Info> <DGCserver> <MBarton> <myserver> <ExecuteThread: '12' for queue: 'default'> <> <> <000000> <Tried to renew lease on lost reference: '706'>
 I have seen in the newsgroup that this was a problem previously in version 4.5.1
 any help would be appreciated.
 best regards,
 Mickey

This shouldn't cause any problems. Does it? We will turn off these info messages.
 Cheers,
 -- Prasad
 Mickey Barton <[email protected]> wrote:
 >Hi,
 >I am running weblogic server 6.1 and get the following messages
 >
 >####<Jan 30, 2002 2:36:55 PM CST> <Info> <DGCserver> <MBarton> <myserver>
 ><ExecuteThread: '12' for queue: 'default'> <> <> <000000> <Tried to
 >renew lease on lost reference: '706'>
 >
 >I have seen in the newsgroup that this was a problem previously in version
 >4.5.1
 >
 >any help would be appreciated.
 >
 >best regards,
 >Mickey

Similar Messages

Tried to renew lease on lost reference in logs.

 I am using Weblogic 6.1 SP1 with 2 cluster configuration. I am seeing a lot of
 "Tried to renew lease on lost reference" msgs in my logs. These msgs seems to
 be logged almost every minute.
 I would like to know what does this msg mean and how would I elimiate this msg
 from my logs.
 Any help will be appreciated.
 Thanks
 Albert


I am relatively sure it has to do with RMI and distributed "garbage
 collection", so it may be related to some of your replicated JNDI entries.
 The other question is what is causing the problem in the first place. Are
 your servers under intense load or are the exec threads getting saturated
 (whether or not the other resources like CPU are saturated)?
 As far as the low-level RMI implementation, I know that Weblogic has its own
 implementation for significant portions of RMI, but I don't know much about
 the implementation, so it is hard to guess. You may be able to get some
 additional pointers from Prasad Peddada[[email protected]].
 Peace,
 Cameron Purdy
 Tangosol Inc.
 Tangosol Coherence: Clustered Coherent Cache for J2EE
 Information at http://www.tangosol.com/
 "Albert" <[email protected]> wrote in message
 news:[email protected]...
 >
 > Cameron,
 >
 > My application doesn't have any EJB's. It is a JSP/Servlet/Oracle based
 application.
 > Do you think of anything in this context.
 >
 > Thanks
 > Albert
 >
 > "Cameron Purdy" <[email protected]> wrote:
 > >Do you use stateful session EJBs? Make sure you remove them when done.
 > >
 > >Peace,
 > >
 > >--
 > >Cameron Purdy
 > >Tangosol Inc.
 > >Tangosol Coherence: Clustered Coherent Cache for J2EE
 > >Information at http://www.tangosol.com/
 > >
 > >
 > >"Albert" <[email protected]> wrote in message
 > >news:[email protected]...
 > >>
 > >> I am using Weblogic 6.1 SP1 with 2 cluster configuration. I am seeing
 > >a
 > >lot of
 > >> "Tried to renew lease on lost reference" msgs in my logs. These msgs
 > >seems
 > >to
 > >> be logged almost every minute.
 > >> I would like to know what does this msg mean and how would I elimiate
 > >this
 > >msg
 > >> from my logs.
 > >> Any help will be appreciated.
 > >>
 > >> Thanks
 > >> Albert
 > >>
 > >
 > >
 >

Tried to renew lease for lost reference

Hi
Oracle sessions get stuck on parsing all sessions accessing the same object wait
on "library cache pin".
We found one session coming from jdbc client waiting on "SQLNET message from client"
and holding all the rest sessions.
When we kill this session the problem resolves.
Following the port holding session with netstat, lsof and so on back to the jdbc
client side on different machine we only see error message connected to the same
port saying "tried to renew lease for lost reference". Our assumption is that
oracle lost connection with the client while locking a DB object when was doing
parsing and thus locked all sessions that wanted to access same object.
Did anybody encounter the same problem? How was resolved?
Thanks.

"Rich Kolkmeier" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:3a366798$[email protected]..
In testing the cluster failover capability, I disconnected the
network cable from one of the servers I was running in a cluster.
The system failed over properly. When I reattached the network
cable, the system added the server back into the cluster. However,
I continue to get the following message:
Tue Dec 12 17:34:51 GMT 2000: <DGCserver> tried to renew lease
for 1 lost references
(s).
What is the cause of this message? What needs to be done to clean
up the cluster?Rich,
This message is printed when one WebLogic kernel tries to renew a lease for
an remote object from another WebLogic which has already been collected. It
makes sense that this might happen in the failure scenario you describe.
When the network is disconnected DGC lease renewals can't be sent and the
kernel exporting the object may therefore believe that the object is no
longer in use and collect it. When the network is re-established the remote
objects may be gone.
However the fact that you are seeing this message printed repeatedly is
troubling. You may want to contact [email protected] with the
description you provided here along with the following additional
information.
Are you seeing this message on the client or server? If on the server is it
on the server that was disconnected or on one of the other servers? What
version (including service packs) of WebLogic are you running?
Regards,
Adam Messinger

Tried to renew lease on lost reference

Hi all,
Can anyone pls help me with the following issue?
I have encountered the following message.
<ExecuteThread: '3' for queue: 'default'> <> <> <000000> <Tried to renew lease
on lost reference: '388'>
After a while, the following message will appear.
<ExecuteThread: '15' for queue: 'default'> <> <> <000000> <Unsolicited error response
for: '-1'>
This shows the threads in the server are all used up.
I will like to know the cause for the first message to appear and how to prevent
it. Whenever this message appears, it is telling us the server is going to hang
soon. We have no idea how to fix this problem. Can anyone help? Thanks.

I know the "tried to renew lease..." message you were getting was just some INFO
message that the server sent out. I believe this message has been surpressed
in Weblogic 6.1 SP3.
Not sure if the other message is part of that. I've been running with the service
pack for so long that I don't remember. :)
"apple" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
Hi all,
Can anyone pls help me with the following issue?
I have encountered the following message.
<ExecuteThread: '3' for queue: 'default'> <> <> <000000> <Tried to renew
lease
on lost reference: '388'>
After a while, the following message will appear.
<ExecuteThread: '15' for queue: 'default'> <> <> <000000> <Unsolicited
error response
for: '-1'>
This shows the threads in the server are all used up.
I will like to know the cause for the first message to appear and how
to prevent
it. Whenever this message appears, it is telling us the server is going
to hang
soon. We have no idea how to fix this problem. Can anyone help? Thanks.

DGCServer - tried to renew lease for lost ref: 509

Recently we have been getting ALOTof messages in our server log file of the
form:
Fri Jul 14 10:08:19 PDT 2000: <DGCserver> tried to renew lease for lost
ref: 509
We use RMI for java client to server communcation and are using Weblogic
4.5.1 SP 8
with nativeIO enabled.
What could be causing these messages?
Thanks!
Rick

Thanks! I still have one problem, the lease renewal messages for lost
references never seem
to end for the specific reference. I have a weblogic.log file with hundreds
of those messages for
each lost reference (and still going). It seems that it is not giving
up... any ideas?
Rick
"Michael Girdley" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:396fa6c8$[email protected]..
Normally, I would ask a customer in the situation to provide more about
their application. But, since I know a lot about how your application is
architected, I would guess the people are shutting down their browserswhile
your applet still running. The applet is not closing the socket cleanly
with Weblogic. The distributed garbage collector, which keeps track ofall
of the distributed objects, is trying to renew a lease for that object.It
cannot locate it and will eventually give up on it.
Thanks,
Michael
Michael Girdley
Product Manager, WebLogic Server & Express
BEA Systems Inc
Rick Spickelmier <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:396f960d$[email protected]..
Recently we have been getting ALOTof messages in our server log file ofthe
form:
Fri Jul 14 10:08:19 PDT 2000: <DGCserver> tried to renew lease forlost
ref: 509
We use RMI for java client to server communcation and are using Weblogic
4.5.1 SP 8
with nativeIO enabled.
What could be causing these messages?
Thanks!
Rick

DGCServer messages in log... "tried to renew lease"

Hi,
 I'm running three WL 4.5.2 servers clustered, JDK1.1.7b on Solaris 2.6.
 Normally the cluster runs just fine, but now I'm beginning to see the
 following message in all three servers:
 <DGCserver> tried to renew lease for lost ref: nnn
 Usually they come in small bursts of about 5 or 10 messages that are the
 same, except the "ref"s keep increasing. I'm guessing it has to do something
 with the in-memory replication of sessions (which I'm using).
 Any ideas? I tried restarting the servers but after a little while the
 messages started again.
 Thanks,
 Matias


One common symptom for this (Bad Status Exception) has been long gc. If gc
 takes more 30 seconds then you will start seeing these errors. To assertain
 this, you could turn on weblogic.debug.cluster=1 and if you see a message "Timed
 out server" in the log then you should tune your server.
 Please use latest service packs.
 thanks
 - Prasad
 Matias Pelenur wrote:
 > Well, after a few restarts the DGC messages aren't appearing anymore... But
 > something different is happening now which seems to be worse... And it's
 > affecting performance too. For some pages, one of the servers will throw a
 > bunch of exceptions (see below), and it seems it's cutting off the output so
 > pages get only half-created. Any ideas? I don't think I changed any settings
 > or anything like that.
 >
 > Thanks,
 > Matias
 >
 > Fri Sep 15 11:19:15 EDT 2000:<E> <HTTP> Servlet request terminiated with
 > Error:
 > Fri Sep 15 11:19:15 EDT 2000:<E> <HTTP>
 > weblogic.cluster.replication.BadStatusException: update found
 > 1802540915606489052 but it is not the secondary
 > at weblogic.rmi.extensions.BasicRequest.sendReceive(Compiled Code)
 > at
 > weblogic.cluster.replication.ReplicationManager_WLStub.update(Compiled Code)
 > at
 > weblogic.cluster.replication.ReplicationManager.updateSecondary(Compiled
 > Code)
 > at weblogic.servlet.internal.session.ReplicatedSession.sync(Compiled
 > Code)
 > at
 > weblogic.servlet.internal.session.ReplicatedSessionContext.sync(Compiled
 > Code)
 > at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletRequestImpl.syncSession(Compiled
 > Code)
 > at
 > weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletContextImpl.invokeServlet(Compiled Code)
 > at
 > weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletContextImpl.invokeServlet(Compiled Code)
 > at weblogic.socket.MuxableSocketHTTP.invokeServlet(Compiled Code)
 > at weblogic.socket.MuxableSocketHTTP.execute(Compiled Code)
 > at weblogic.t3.srvr.ExecuteThread.run(Compiled Code)
 > --------------- nested within: ------------------
 > weblogic.utils.NestedError: Tried to update secondary, but it thought it was
 > the primary
 > - with nested exception:
 > [weblogic.cluster.replication.BadStatusException: update found
 > 18025409156064890
 > 52 but it is not the secondary]
 > at java.lang.Throwable.<init>(Compiled Code)
 > at java.lang.Error.<init>(Compiled Code)
 > at weblogic.utils.NestedError.<init>(Compiled Code)
 > at weblogic.servlet.internal.session.ReplicatedSession.sync(Compiled
 > Code)
 > at
 > weblogic.servlet.internal.session.ReplicatedSessionContext.sync(Compiled
 > Code)
 > at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletRequestImpl.syncSession(Compiled
 > Code)
 > at
 > weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletContextImpl.invokeServlet(Compiled Code)
 > at
 > weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletContextImpl.invokeServlet(Compiled Code)
 > at weblogic.socket.MuxableSocketHTTP.invokeServlet(Compiled Code)
 > at weblogic.socket.MuxableSocketHTTP.execute(Compiled Code)
 > at weblogic.t3.srvr.ExecuteThread.run(Compiled Code)
 >
 > "Prasad Peddada" <[email protected]> wrote in message
 > news:[email protected]...
 > > Is this causing any problems on the server. Like unable to create sessions
 > for
 > > servlets/jsp's
 > >
 > > If so, this is related to DGC bug, if not then it is something else,
 > unless we
 > > know the object it is trying to find, I can't be of much help.
 > >
 > > - Prasad
 > >
 > > Matias Pelenur wrote:
 > >
 > > > Hi,
 > > > I'm running three WL 4.5.2 servers clustered, JDK1.1.7b on Solaris 2.6.
 > > >
 > > > Normally the cluster runs just fine, but now I'm beginning to see the
 > > > following message in all three servers:
 > > >
 > > > <DGCserver> tried to renew lease for lost ref: nnn
 > > >
 > > > Usually they come in small bursts of about 5 or 10 messages that are the
 > > > same, except the "ref"s keep increasing. I'm guessing it has to do
 > something
 > > > with the in-memory replication of sessions (which I'm using).
 > > >
 > > > Any ideas? I tried restarting the servers but after a little while the
 > > > messages started again.
 > > > Thanks,
 > > >
 > > > Matias
 > >
 Cheers
 - Prasad

DGCserver Message

My weblogic Server keep on giving this message:
<Jun 24, 2002 6:06:19 PM GMT+08:00> <Info> <DGCserver> <Tried to renew lease
on
lost reference: '286'>
<Jun 24, 2002 6:07:19 PM GMT+08:00> <Info> <DGCserver> <Tried to renew lease
on
lost reference: '289'>
<Jun 24, 2002 6:07:19 PM GMT+08:00> <Info> <DGCserver> <Tried to renew lease
on
lost reference: '290'>
<Jun 24, 2002 6:07:19 PM GMT+08:00> <Info> <DGCserver> <Tried to renew lease
on
lost reference: '291'>
<Jun 24, 2002 6:07:19 PM GMT+08:00> <Info> <DGCserver> <Tried to renew lease
on
lost reference: '286'>
Any idea what does this message means?
I am using Weblogic Server 6.1 SP2 running on HP-UX.

Lim Boon Siong <[email protected]> wrote:
Thanks for your answer. I need more details.
Do you know why is this happen?ed Any impact to the server? Is it caused by
my application or weblogic server? How to prevent it from happening?I think these are harmless - you can simply change severity from 'Info' to
'Error'.
Many thanks for your answer.
Boon Siong
"Dimitri I. Rakitine" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]..
I think it means that server was not able to process RMI lease renewal
message in time, and by the time when message is finally processed, object
is already gone.
Lim Boon Siong <[email protected]> wrote:
My weblogic Server keep on giving this message:
<Jun 24, 2002 6:06:19 PM GMT+08:00> <Info> <DGCserver> <Tried to renew
lease
on
lost reference: '286'>
<Jun 24, 2002 6:07:19 PM GMT+08:00> <Info> <DGCserver> <Tried to renewlease
on
lost reference: '289'>
<Jun 24, 2002 6:07:19 PM GMT+08:00> <Info> <DGCserver> <Tried to renewlease
on
lost reference: '290'>
<Jun 24, 2002 6:07:19 PM GMT+08:00> <Info> <DGCserver> <Tried to renewlease
on
lost reference: '291'>
<Jun 24, 2002 6:07:19 PM GMT+08:00> <Info> <DGCserver> <Tried to renewlease
on
lost reference: '286'>
Any idea what does this message means?
I am using Weblogic Server 6.1 SP2 running on HP-UX.--
Dimitri
Dimitri

Renewed lease messages in cluster log

I just started a cluster of 2 servers, and so far it seems to be working
 ok. I'm alarmed, however, that the log file is being saturated with
 entries that look like this:
 Fri Oct 29 09:02:19 CDT 1999: <DGCClient> Renewed lease for 19
 objects hosted by
 2789039048855955648Sxxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:[2114,2114,2124,2124,-1]
 Note: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx is the host name of the other server in the
 cluster, 2114 is the listen port and 2124 is the SSL listen port.
 A new line gets added every minute about a renewed lease. Is there any
 way to turn this logging off?
 Thanks.
 Jeff Byrd [email protected]
 Health Information Systems Engineer
 Vanderbilt University Medical Center


Should be fixed in SP4
 Joel Nylund wrote:
 > Has this been fixed in any of the sp's???
 >
 > thanks
 > Joel
 >
 > Gaurav Chawla wrote:
 >
 > > Hi Jeff,
 > >
 > > You cannot turn it off in the current release but it has been fixed and this
 > > feature will be available in the future release.
 > >
 > > -gaurav.
 > >
 > > Jeff Byrd wrote:
 > >
 > > > I just started a cluster of 2 servers, and so far it seems to be working
 > > > ok. I'm alarmed, however, that the log file is being saturated with
 > > > entries that look like this:
 > > >
 > > > Fri Oct 29 09:02:19 CDT 1999: <DGCClient> Renewed lease for 19
 > > > objects hosted by
 > > > 2789039048855955648Sxxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:[2114,2114,2124,2124,-1]
 > > >
 > > > Note: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx is the host name of the other server in the
 > > > cluster, 2114 is the listen port and 2124 is the SSL listen port.
 > > >
 > > > A new line gets added every minute about a renewed lease. Is there any
 > > > way to turn this logging off?
 > > >
 > > > Thanks.
 > > > --
 > > > Jeff Byrd [email protected]
 > > > Health Information Systems Engineer
 > > > Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Self-assigned IP after trying to renew DHCP lease for former network

Hi all,
MacBook Pro 15" purchased in Februrary 2008, currently running 10.5.5, up-to-date with patches as of yesterday, 10/20/2008.
For a few weeks now, I've been consistently unable to connect to wireless networks (secured or unsecured, public or private) after changing networks (i.e. going from home to a coffee shop).
I have control over my home network router, and its logs show that upon connecting to the network, OS X tries to renew a DHCP lease for the previous network it was on. Upon receiving the "bad network" DHCP reply, instead of releasing the lease and obtaining a new one, the AirPort interface is immediately assigned an IPV4LL address (from 169.254.0.0/16) and no combination of changing network settings, changing AirPort settings, or rebooting will eliminate the old DHCP lease.
The end result is that my MBP is entirely nonfunctional on some wireless networks that other clients (both Windows and Mac) seem to have no trouble accessing. The problem is quite annoying because I can't connect to access points that (previously) worked fine and whose configurations haven't changed.
In any case where this problem occurs, an old DHCP lease for a different network (10.0.0.0/8 when trying to get on 192.168.0.0/24 or vice versa) is present, so I strongly suspect a DHCP problem. In all cases, I have perfect connectivity to the access point itself, so problems with the wireless connection parameters (including encryption), or those troublesome problems with 802.11b/g/n interoperation seem highly unlikely.
One of two things would help me:
1) Please tell me how to clear the DHCP lease cache. Deleting files from /var/db/dhcpclient/leases does nothing (they appear again upon reboot, identical save for timestamps even after changing network environments, so the cache must be read at boot time and written at shutdown). Selecting "Renew DHCP lease" from the "TCP/IP" tab in the advanced network settings merely attempts to renew the existing lease (for an invalid IP address); it does not appear to release invalid leases.
2) If this is really how the DHCP client is behaving, change the DHCP client so that upon receiving the "Bad network" response, it releases (or simply abandons) the lease and obtains a new one, rather than immediately assigning an IPV4LL address to the AirPort interface.
Additionally, is there any documentation on the Apple DHCP client? Under Linux, I could alter dhcpcd parameters to diagnose things like this. I could find no documentation about the Apple DHCP client outside of Mac Help, which wasn't really any help in this case.
Finally, I do not suspect that this is an instance of the problem discussed in http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1352518&tstart=0 as my connection is rock-solid if it can get an IP address when it connects. I've never even seen it hiccup.
Thanks,
Matt Z.

I have had wireless problems intermittently for a year, and seriously for 6 weeks. Apple denied the issue and was no help in spite of many tens of thousands of people on their own discussions complaining. I found a post suggesting a couple of things which fixed the problem. I don't know if both are necessary, but the first by itself does not solve the problem.
Lock the channel of your router to channel 1, apparently Apple and 802.11n don't play well together on higher channels. When this becomes a standard this will be resolved I hope.
Open your network preferences, select 'airport' and advanced. Delete unused networks. Select your network.
Open TCP/IP and write down all the settings, configure iPv4 manually. Enter the settings manually. Turn off IpV6.
Open DNS and write down your DNS server. Delete it and re-enter it manually.
This has worked on 2 macbooks and an iMac for the last 3 weeks with no network drops.
Joe Shea
Philadelphia

Unable to see custom Trace messages in Log Viewer which were defined in UDF

Hello Experts, I am not able to see my trace messages in Log Viewer. I have a small user defined fuction which takes a variable and returns its uppercase and while do that it writes few warning level trace messages in the trace file. I've tried changing the levels from Warning to Info but I still don't see anything in my Log Viewer. At this point I am not even sure if I am looking at right place. When I test my mapping in Message Mapping's Test tab it works fine and shows me all my trace messages. But when I do end to end it is not writing anything to the trace file. I've tried to use instructions from following blogs:
1. /people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2007/04/30/xipi-personalized-logging-tracing(logging and tracing)
2. /people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/05/10/xi-i-cannot-see-some-of-my-messages-in-the-sxmbmoni (logging and tracing)
3. /people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/02/25/simple-java-code-in-graphical-mapping--xi(for my UDF)
but I still don't see traces in my Log Viewer. Please let me know if I am doing anything wrong here.
Thanks in advance!!
==============================================================
public String TraceVar(String var1, Container container) throws StreamTransformationException{
AbstractTrace importanttrace; //create an instace of AbstractTrace
importanttrace = container.getTrace(); //get trace
importanttrace.addWarning("FiletoFileMP:MyUdflibrary: " + var1); //write first message to the trace
// fix the naming conventions later
String SenderName; // declare multiple vars to store infos
String ReceiverName;
String interface_name;
String message_ID;
String time_Sent;
java.util.Map map;
map = container.getTransformationParameters();
//get interface info into the variables
time_Sent = (String) map.get(StreamTransformationConstants.TIME_SENT);
message_ID = (String) map.get(StreamTransformationConstants.MESSAGE_ID);
interface_name = (String) map.get(StreamTransformationConstants.INTERFACE);
SenderName = (String) map.get(StreamTransformationConstants.SENDER_NAME);
ReceiverName = (String) map.get(StreamTransformationConstants.RECEIVER_NAME);
//post interface info to the trace
importanttrace.addWarning("Time Sent: " + time_Sent);
importanttrace.addWarning("Message ID: " + message_ID);
importanttrace.addWarning("Interface Name: " + interface_name);
importanttrace.addWarning("Sender Name: " + SenderName);
importanttrace.addWarning("Receiver Name: " + ReceiverName);
//convert var1 to uppercase to make sure this function has be executed
return var1.toUpperCase();
Edited by: Mayur Patel on May 5, 2009 11:03 PM

Thank you Prateek for a quick response.
Yes I was able to see my trace messages in SXMB_MONI. Below is my the info... This is great. I am still not sure why this info is not showing up in Log Veiwer's (default trace) window. Any ideas? Since this XML file contains lots of other information I was wondering how to put my trace messages into the log viewer.
Thanks!!
<Trace level="1" type="T">*** START APPLICATION TRACE ***</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">FiletoFileMP:MyUdfLibrary: Honda</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">FiletoFileMP:MyUdfLibrary: Honda</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Time Sent: 2009-05-05T16:16:39Z</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Message ID: 366CEAF14D3B410033AFDDB71CD2AF73</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Interface Name: SIC_Car_Outbound</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Sender Name: SIC_Car_Outbound</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Receiver Name: SI_Car_Inbound</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">*** END APPLICATION TRACE ***</Trace>

LE_SHP_DELIVERY_PROC Error message through Log .

Hi,
I'm working on a BADI LE_SHP_DELIVERY_PROC inside the method FILL_DELIVERY_ITEM. I have to show an error message over here. If i passed like MESSAGE e000(zless) WITH text-006 text-007 it is displaying message but it is come out from the layout of the transaction in scope.
Te be more specific, when the pop up of message comes out and after that the user click on the "Exit" button, the system should go back on the previous layout of the report to allow the user making another selection.
I'm using Vl10D transaction.
Now I'm trying to generate the error message through log by CT_LOG internal table . I have to block the deliveries whichever is creating through this transaction. If for a particular STO there are different loading points then I need to block the deliveries.
I'm trying to block the current delivery using IS_LIKP-LIFSK = 'X' and also I need to block the previous delivery IT_XLIKP-LIFSK = 'X'.
strange thing is happening with STO which has 2 deliveries are getting created (because error msg is not getting tirggered thorugh log), though I have blocked the deliveries.
Could you please let me know how can i populate this error message through log as well as I can block the deliveries?
Thanks in advance,
Abhijit

Hi
To lock the delivery, see Note 198137 - VL10: Customer-specific enhancements / user exits and use this userexits. To populate the log I think that using the structure CT_LOG in the BADI is OK. Check when are called the userexit and BADI.
I hope this helps you
Regards
Eduardo

Printing messages in Log File and Output File using Dbms_output.put_line

Hi,
I have a requirement of printing messages in log file and output file using dbms_output.put_line instead of fnd_file.put_line API.
Please let me know how can I achieve this.
I tried using a function to print messages and calling that function in my main package where ever there is fnd_file.put_line. But this approach is not required by the business.
So let me know how I can achieve this functionality.
Regards
Sandy

What is the requirement that doesn't allow you using fnd_file.put_line?
Please see the following links.
https://forums.oracle.com/forums/search.jspa?threadID=&q=Dbms_output.put_line+AND+Log+AND+messages&objID=c3&dateRange=all&userID=&numResults=15&rankBy=10001
https://forums.oracle.com/forums/search.jspa?threadID=&q=%22dbms_output.put_line+%22+AND+concurrent&objID=c3&dateRange=all&userID=&numResults=15&rankBy=10001
Thanks,
Hussein

Wi-Fi Renew Lease Not Working

The Wi-Fi connection for my 3Gs on my Airport Extreme home network occasionally quits working, but by doing a Renew Lease under network settings on the phone I 'was' able to get it working again it right away. But now for some reason that no longer works. Any suggestions?
I tried Forget this Network and reconnecting, but that didn't do it.

Well I called Apple and they were absolutely no help. They said the problem was likely with my Airport and not the phone, so I'd have to pay for support. I think that's bogus

"Files Mismatch" message when logging

I'm in the process of logging my footage. All my clips are currently off line and when I try to reconnect them to the media (AIC.mov files in my capture scratch folder), I get the "files Mismatch" message. I tried to ignore it and continue but it messed up my time codes.
The reason I checked off the box "matching files only" is that FCP would not let me choose the correct file (it was gray) when trying to reconnect and that box was checked.
Any ideas?

I exported a batch list back into my documents folder and the clips have the same TC so I guess it OK. It's more detailed than the original excel doc, but the details are identical.
I have also moved back the project folder (capture scratch, render files etc..) into the documents folder as it was before and tried to reconnect but nothing seems to help.
As a guide I used the Ken Stones website and that's where I got the idea to do the logging offline using excel and then importing it into FCP. In the guide as well once he imported them into FCP they came of line but then he captured it from the tapes, but in my case all my footage is already in the computer, playing perfectly when played...

RecipientThreadLimitExceeded in message tracking logs, queuing and holding up local email delivery to office365

Please let me know if anyone knows an answer to this one... We're in a Hybrid Exchange environment, with 2 x Exchange 2007 servers, and 1 x Exchange 2013 Hybrid server which is pointing to Office 365 for the purposes of relaying mail to O365 while
we migrate our users out there.
We have just finished migrating, but just a couple of days ago we started experiencing delays in email delivery to O365... Not all mail, but some! Incoming email or locally generated email gets relayed out through the Hybrid server and out to O365,
but not all email is delayed... only some, but it's constant. During the busiest part of the day, about 200 messages are sitting in the Queue in Exch2013... but they all eventually resolve between 5 and 45minutes. The users are not happy.
The last error in the queue viewer for each hung email reads: 451 4.4.0 Temporary server error. Please try again later.
If I look at the message tracking logs, I find an interesting item -- "RecipientThreadLimitExceeded":
2014-05-15T14:15:51.608Z,192.168.3.11,hydra,207.46.163.215,company-mail-onmicrosoft-com.mail.protection.outlook.com,RecipientThreadLimitExceeded,Outbound to Office 365,SMTP,DEFER,10307921510617,<[email protected]>,885ea3ce-a020-41b1-8950-08d13e58d6d3,[email protected],451
4.4.0 Temporary server error. Please try again later,10117,1,,,Read: This is your generic subject line,[email protected],[email protected],2014-05-15T14:16:51.608Z,Undefined,,,,S:Microsoft.Exchange.Transport.MailRecipient.RequiredTlsAuthLevel=Opportunistic;S:Microsoft.Exchange.Transport.MailRecipient.EffectiveTlsAuthLevel=EncryptionOnly;S:DeliveryPriority=Normal
I have tried to find some documentation on resolution for this RecipientThreadLimitExceeded error, but I can only come up with some Exchange 2011 documentation which recommends adding some entries to the EdgeTransport.exe.config file to bump up the RecipientThreadLimit
value... I have not found anything pertaining to 2013. I cannot even find any powershell commands to see what the current RecipientThreadLimit is on 2013! Aghg!
Has anyone seen this before, or have any recommendations?
Thank you,
Mike

After many days of frustration, Microsoft Support finally resolved this issue. Believe it or not, but the issue was actually on the Office365 side. Here's the fix:
Exchange Admin Center -> Mail Flow -> Connectors -> Inbound Connectors
Open your "Inbound from <guid>" with the "On-premises" connector type
Click on Scope -> scroll down to "Associated accepted domains"
We had an entry in there "<organization>.mail.onmicrosoft.com"... Microsoft support had us remove this entry so that the box was completely empty.
That RESOLVED it... amazing what what little entry could do. We've had this entry in there for about 2 months, and it had been working fine. Support acknowledged that several customers have had this issue, that they are working on getting it
fixed on the back-end.
Hope this helps somebody...
-Mike

DGCserver messages in log... "Tried to renew lease on lost reference"

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for