Different value posting in GR

Hi,
   During Goods receipt for import purcahse order bellow three condition type value posted with high value and difference of total purchase order value and these three condition type posted to Inventory account.
     ZOA1     Customs %
     CVD     Countervailing Duty%
     CVDA     Additional CVD %
Any one have idea why system posting high value than purchase order.
Thanks,

Hi,
once check your condition types in m/06 and once check the info record  in conditions you have maintain any values for your condition types.
Thanking you.

Similar Messages

  • Moveing average price after posting invoice with different value  than GR

    Hello all
    I have a question as in subject.
    If I will post goods receipt and after this I would like to post an invoice in MIRO with different value than in goods receipt , the MAP on my stock will change about this different???

    Hi,
    Your MAP will get recalculated as the price difference will change the total value of the stock and the stock quantity will remain the same
    MAP=Total value/Total stock
    Hope this will help you
    Reward if useful
    Thanx and Regards
    SHYAM.R

  • LinkedHashMap problem (Same key but different value)

    Dear Friends,
    There is problem in LinkedHashMap for same key but different values.
    I want both values of same key as Output.
    Plz help me from an example code & it's output
    LinkedHashMap<Object, LinkedList<Object>> linkhash = new LinkedHashMap<Object, LinkedList<Object>>();
    LinkedList<Object> ll6 = new LinkedList<Object>();
              LinkedList<Object> ll7 = new LinkedList<Object>();
              LinkedList<Object> ll9 = new LinkedList<Object>();
    objectName="Listitem";
              ll6.add("id\tlisti");
              ll6.add("tag\tlistcell");
              ll6.add("tag\tlistcell");
              linkhash.put(objectName, ll6);
              System.out.println("List is "+linkhash);
              objectName="Listcell";
              ll7.add("id\tlistc");
              ll7.add("label\tCEO");
              linkhash.put(objectName, ll7);
              System.out.println("List is "+linkhash);
              objectName="Listcell";
              ll9.add("id\tlistc1");
              ll9.add("label\tNKC");
              linkhash.put(objectName, ll9);
              System.out.println("List is "+linkhash);
    output is
    List is {Listitem=[id     listi, tag     listcell, tag     listcell]}
    List is {Listitem=[id     listi, tag     listcell, tag     listcell], Listcell=[id     listc, label     CEO]}
    List is {Listitem=[id     listi, tag     listcell, tag     listcell], Listcell=[id     listc1, label     NKC]}
    I want output as
    List is {Listitem=[id  listi, tag  listcell, tag  listcell],Listcell=[id   listc, label CEO], Listcell=[id     listc1, label  NKC]}
    Plz help me
    Thanks Friend
    Edited by: kkcnkc on Apr 1, 2009 6:47 AM

    Double post. Locking.

  • Query parameters with the same name and different values

    According to HTTP, multiple query or post parameters with the
    same name and different values are permitted. They are transfered
    over the wire in the following format -
    name1=val1&name1=val2&name1=val3
    The problem is that I can't see anyway of assigning multiple
    parameters with the same name and different values to the request
    object of mx.rpc.http.HTTPService. I have tried using the
    flash.utils.Dictionary object as it does strict key comparison but
    that doesn't work too. I have tried setting an array of values to a
    property of the request object but that sends the request to the
    server in the following format -
    name1=val1,val2,val3
    The java servlet engines throw exceptions when they see this.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.

    If you're not on 8.1.4 move there. 8.1.3 had limitations in the wsrp
    release.
    wrote:
    I have an html select box that contains several values, and multiple
    selection is enabled. When my code runs as a remote portlet, the
    following is showing up in the soap monitor when I select multiple
    values and submit the form:
    <urn:interactionParams>
    <urn:portletStateChange>cloneBeforeWrite</urn:portletStateChange>
    <urn:interactionState>_action=addEmployeesToGroup</urn:interactionState>
    <urn:formParameters
    name="P62005wlw-select_key:{actionForm.selectedEmployees}OldValue">
    <urn:value>true</urn:value>
    </urn:formParameters>
    <urn:formParameters
    name="P62005wlw-select_key:{actionForm.selectedEmployees}">
    <urn:value>beatest1</urn:value>
    </urn:formParameters>
    In this case, I selected beatest1 and beatest2, but only beatest1 comes
    through to the remote portlet. Is this a known bug, and, if so, is
    there a patch or workaround available?
    Thanks in advance,
    Andy

  • ABAP WebDynpro: Table cells with different values.

    Hello,
    I am not sure how the following can be achieved.
    I have a table with 10 rows in it. First column should have different values in cells (static value that do not come from anywhere). For example, colors: black, green, yellow, etc.
    I inserted a table column. In that column I inserted a Cell Editor of type TextView. If I define a 'text' property of this element than it marks all cells in this column with this text. I need to assign different values to each cell.
    How can this be done?
    Thank you.

    Probably you should post this the Web Dynpro Forum
    Web Dynpro Java
    Regards,
    Ravi
    Note : Please close this thread.

  • Time Dimension Type allows different values in attributes - Bug or Feature?

    Not sure if this is a bug or a feature.
    But if one has multiple hierarchies on a Time dimension. You have the ability to specify different values for member attributes in different hierarchies.
    Example.
    Hierarchy A has MIN_ID for it's Member and uses MIN_END_DATE for it's END_DATE
    Hierarchy B has MIN_ID for it's Member and uses SESS_END_DATE for it's END_DATE
    As per this post and David Greenfield's comment:
    Dimension Sort issue when multiple mappings for different hierarchies
    "Are you attempting to map the same attribute, SORT, to different columns in the two hierarchies? Put another way, do you expect the same member to have different values for the attribute in the two different hierarchies? If so, then this is a problem since a member must have the same value for the attribute regardless of the hierarchy."
    Unlike a user dimension, a time dimension appears to allow this and it appears to work as intended. Is the behavior in this case intended to be different between a user and time dimension?

    I think that this is not a bug. There is an incompatibility in design which prevents you from using the same attribute differently for both hierarchies.
    NOTE: Unlike parent relationship which depends on <dimension, dimension hierarchy>, Dimension Attribute is dependent on <dimension> alone, not dependent on <dimension, dimension hierarchy> combination. Hence it can only take on 1 value for 1 dimension member.
    I think that the time dimension only appears to allow this. The key thing to check is for Time Dimension members which are common to both the hierarchies. Only one of the mappings will take effect (usually the hierarchy which is loaded last will remain in the aw/usable for queries, reports.. it would have over-written the earlier attribute value loaded as per the earlier hierarchy load).
    Visualize a dimension as a long list of members which are built up contiguously on a per hierarchy, per level process using the mapping information saved. Once a member is defined (created) via Hierarchy A, it wont be created once again while loading Hierarchy B but is instead updated or redefined based on Hierarchy B's mapping info.
    Assuming the dimension load attempts to load Hierarchy A first and then Hierarchy B,
    * Dimension load for Hierarchy A will define the various members using MIN_ID and set the END_DATE attribute to value=MIN_END_DATE
    * Dimension load for Hierarchy B will re-define the various members using MIN_ID and re-set or over-write the END_DATE attribute to value=SESS_END_DATE
    * In this case, it looks like all members are common for both hierarchies (as both members are mapped to same column MIN_ID) and you would end up with END_DATE=SESS_END_DATE.
    Actually whether all members are common to both hierarchies or not depends on the quality of data in your snowflake/star table: if parent level for Hierarchy A as well as Hierarchy B is setup fine then the members will be same set (overlapping in whole). If some rows for MIN_ID have parent column for Hierarchy A setup correctly but parent column for Hierarchy B =null or invalid value then that member will exist in Hierarchy A alone and would contain END_DATE=MIN_END_DATE as the corresponding update along Hierarchy B would fail due to hierarchy data quality issues (join from current level to parent level).
    As regards a solution to your problem, you should not use the same attribute "SORT" for dual purpose (both hierarchies). Instead define attributes SORT_A and SORT_B and make them enabled for Hierarchy A, Hierarchy B respectively and map/use them appropriately in your reports.
    HTH
    Shankar

  • Settlement  inv. measure to Auc: different values in different depr. areas

    Hi!
    Due to IAS/IFRS principles we have to manage different Asset values for a Local Gaap and IAS depreciation areas. We know that is possible to use transaction types limited to each single area to post different values directly in AA.
    We'd like to know if there is a way to settle different values from investment measures to AuC's different areas; since in customizing is possible to define only one specific internal transaction type for settlement from investment measures to AuC. We cannot use Key capitalization, since we are not using different cost elements.
    We are also considering to use custom enhancement.
    Do you have any suggestions about it?
    Thanks in advance!
    Giovanna

    Hi,
    Could you please let me know if this is solved? If yes the approach you have taken to solve this. We have a similar kind of requirement.
    Thanks,
    Anuradha

  • Asset Activation with different values in dep. areas via CJ88

    Hi,
    I would like to activate an asset via CJ88 from an AuC.
    The challenge is that I would like to activate different values in different depreciaton areas.
    I have seen that the AuC uses transaction types 338/339 for the transfer posting. In this transactions types it is possible to choose transactions types for the transer posting for the new asset which is currently 331/336. What I have done is that I copied 331/336 to Z31/Z36 and adapted them so that its possible to chosse the values for the different dep. areas. I also replaced 331/336 in the types 338/339.
    But when I run CJ88, it still takes 331/336....
    Any idea? Is my approach possible? Any other Idea?
    Thanks and best regards,
    Sebastian

    Hi Sebastian
    Assume you want to settle 100 to Dep Area 01 and 120 to Area 15
    During initial settlement, let the system settle 100 to both using 331/336
    You make a copy of them and limit the Z trans type to Dep Area 15 alone.. Then post 20 USD to Dep Area 15 using ABSO
    Br. Ajay M

  • CALCLATED KF SHOWING DIFFERENT VALUES FOR DIFFERENT CURRENCY TYPES

    Hi Experts
    When I am executing the query( On a Multi provider) with the selection of Company code, controlling area, WBS ELEMENT, currency type I am seeing two different values (XXXX EUROS and YYYY EUROS)for a formula for total variable cost when i select two different currency types( CONTROLLING AREA AND GROUP CURRENCY)
    I have two currency types called CONTROLLING AREA CURRENCY and GROUP CURRENCY(BOTH IN EUROS).
    This WBS  element is not having any sales document.How can I see the exact value for this WBS element in the R3 side.
    Is there any possibility that the same dataelement TOTAL VARIABLE COST have different values when i execute with differnt currency types in the selection screen.
    In what approach can i proceed from R3 side  to the query to solve this issue. on the R3 side when i see in FB03 (settlement posting) for this WBS it is balanced. I am seeing only partial posting for this in the Query
    Could any one help me to solve this.
    Thanks in Advance
    Best regards

    Hi Rajesh,
    I guess the holiday which was configured in Holiday calendar (Holi) is not declared as Paid holiday in Public Holidays-Holiday Calendar.
    Goto SCAL - choose Public Holiday - change mode - look for the holiday (Holi) configured - change mode again - lookout for 'Public Holiday Class' and see whether ' 1 ' is maintained there, if not maintained, type 1 there and save it.
    PS (1 - Ordinary Public Holiday....i,e paid holiday).
    Now go to PT01 and generate WSR. This will sort out your issue.
    If the above is not working,
    I guess there are different PSA/ESG grouping for the employees and maybe their Holiday Calendar itself is different. check out whether the PSA and ESG grouping in Time Mgmt is same or different for those employees for whom the paid holiday is not getting generated and also check out the Holiday Calendar for these set of employees and try the above given solution there.
    Hope this helps.
    regards,
    Santhosh
    Edited by: Santhosh on Mar 31, 2009 11:34 AM

  • Fixed_Date: Defaulting the systimestamp to a different value

    Hi All,
    In our Database we are using Systimestamp rather than sysdate as per Customers requirement. We need to default systimestamp to different value rather than the Current Date.
    We tried Fixed_date but its working only for sysdate.
    Can some one help me on this
    Cheers

    945381 wrote:
    In our Database we are using Systimestamp rather than sysdate as per Customers requirement. We need to default systimestamp to different value rather than the Current Date.
    We tried Fixed_date but its working only for sysdate.
    Can some one help me on thisThis is off-topic for this forum. Post DB issues with no APEX dimension in the {forum:id=61} forum.

  • :VARIABLE_NAME and v('VARIABLE_NAME') have different values

    A basic question ...
    I have the following ... (including some debug stuff) ...
    IF (:P3_PE_REQ_STATE = 'NEW') THEN
    :P3_PE_REQ_STATE := 'DRAFT';
    insert into debug_table values(null,v('P3_PE_REQ_STATE'));
    insert into debug_table values(null,:P3_PE_REQ_STATE);
    commit;
    END IF;
    The DEBUG_TABLE shows two different values ... with v('P3_PE_REQ_STATE') = 'NEW' and :P3_PE_REQ_STATE = 'DRAFT'
    Why would these be different?

    In ajc's block, v('P3_PE_REQ_STATE') obtains the value from the PL/SQL package state copy of session state in the database session. This is the pre-updated value. The assignment statement with :P3_PE_REQ_STATE on the left-hand side changes the value of the bind variable, which may be subsequently altered/referenced as a bind variable to the extent the name remains in scope for the duration of the dynamic execution of the block. At the end of the block, the final value of any bind variables corresponding to page or application items and whose pre- and post-execution values are different are written to the session state tables and committed (using the same code invoked by HTMLDB_UTIL.SET_SESSION_STATE). At that point the package-state copy of session state is also updated so that subsequent references using the v function will get the updated value.
    Scott

  • Update Work Process - Different value in SM51 & TU02...which is correct?

    Hi,
    i am checking update work process configured in the system.
    In SM51, i am getting 36 update work process but when i checked it through transaction
    TU02 -> Active parameter, i found the parameter rdisp/wp_no_vb value is 16.
    Am surprised to see the different value at different place, how its possible.
    which is true, how many update work process is configured in the system?
    regards,
    Rakesh

    Hello  Rakesh Ranjan,
    We all realized that you already solved the problem but unfortunately you closed this message without saying anything, what had actually happened and how you solved this problem... if you don´t mind share with all community (so that in future other users can solve the same situation with this post!
    Best regards,
    João Dimas - Portugal

  • Good night,  I ended up making a purchase at Apple, but my credit card operator called me to confirm the values ​​and was told different values ​​than bought.  Purchases appeared as:  $ 159.70 (protocol 604627) $ 137.00 (protocol 604538) $ 105.39 (protoco

    good night,
    I ended up making a purchase at Apple, but my credit card operator called me to confirm the values ​​and was told different values ​​than bought.
    Purchases appeared as:
    $ 159.70 (protocol 604627)
    $ 137.00 (protocol 604538)
    $ 105.39 (protocol 604468)
    $ 0.01 (protocol 615633)
    Could you check what is happening? Because I had to cancel my card for security.
    Sincerely,

    np33td33 wrote:
    My purchases were:
    macBookPro
    office 2011
    iwork
    ilife
    and these purchases did not appear in the system credit card
    Call Apple at 1800MYAPPLE.  We just deal with MacBook Pro issues, and we have nothing to do with Apple.  Please read what others have posted.

  • How to get different values in drop down in  table rows

    Hi
    I have an application, which has a drop down in the table. Each row is to have different values in its drop down based on the "characteristic" parameter. For eg. first row has characteristic as color, and the corresponding drop down will contain the color names. Second row has charateristic as weight, and the drop down will carry corresponding weight values.
    I am getting the data from the backend as a flat table i.e. charaterisitc - value pair.
    I think i will have to use the Drop Down by Index control, but i dont know how exactly to go about it.
    Can any one please help in this regard.
    Thanks & regards,
    Anupreet

    Hi Maksim
    I am sorry, but i am not able to get you.
    This is the piece of code that i wrote for populating the drop down:
    IPrivateMaintainDocAttribView.IDropElement dropEle = null;
    for(int i = 0;i<size;i++)
                 dropEle = wdContext.nodeDrop().createDropElement();
                 dropEle.setDropval(wdContext.nodeCtxNode_DocAttribs().getCtxNode_DocAttribsElementAt(i).getCmpCtx_Value());
                 wdContext.nodeDrop().addElement(dropEle);
    Here, Dropis the sub node to which i am putting the data and thisis linked to the table.
    CtxNode_DocAttribs is the model node from where i am picking the data and setting in the subnode.
    Thanks & regards,
    Anupreet

  • Different FM posting dates in PO or PR item with multiple accoun. assignmen

    Hi,
    I'd like to know if there´s a way to assign different FM posting dates, for each line of a distributed item in a PO or PR.
    Example:
    Purchase Requisition 4500000010
          Item 1 (has 2 different account assignments or is distibuted by percentage)
                   50% goes to fund center XXXX, etc.
                   50% goes to fund center YYYY, etc.
    Right now we have the update profile for the PR set to delivery date, but it will assign the same FM posting date to the two different account assignments of item 1, because delivery date is on Item level. What I need is to know if there's a way to indicate the system to take different posting dates for each account assignment within the Item 1.
    I hope that I was clear enough to make understand.
    Thanks in advance.
    Kind regards,
      Víctor

    Hi Victor,
    I do not think, it's possible in standard...
    Regards,
    Eli

Maybe you are looking for