Digikam - Detected locked database file

Hello!
I have problem with Digikam. Konsole reports this:
digikam(1153)/digikam (core) Digikam::DatabaseCoreBackendPrivate::checkRetrySQLiteLockError: Detected locked database file. There is an active transaction. Waited but giving up now.
Digikam opens normally, I can see my albums, but when I click on one of them, nothing happens. Path to my Pictures is /data/Pictures [on my second hdd]. I tried everything what I could think of, but no success.
My system:
- KDE 5
- Kernel 4.0.4-2-ARCH x86_64
- digikam 4.9.0-2
- kipi-plugins 4.9.0-2
- fully updated
My digikamrc:
[Database Settings]
Database Connectoptions=
Database Hostname=
Database Name=/data/Pictures/
Database Name Thumbnails=/data/Pictures/
Database Password=
Database Port=-1
Database Type=QSQLITE
Database Username=
Internal Database Server=false
What is locking the database? Any thoughts?

Hi all
Found it.
It was a MenuCalendarClock upgrade and nothing to do with Leopard per se.
Kind Regards
Eric

Similar Messages

ORA-01157: cannot identify/lock data file error in standby database.

Hi,
i have a primary database and standby database (11.2.0.1.0) running in ASM with different diskgroup names. I applied an incremental backup on standby database to resolve archive log gap and generated a controlfile for standby in primary database and restored the controlfile in standby database.But when i started the MRP process its not starting and thows error in alert log ORA-01157: cannot identify/lock data file. When i queried the standby database file it shows the location on primary database datafiles names not the standby database.
PRIMARY DATABASE
SQL> select name from v$datafile;
NAME
+DATA/oradb/datafile/system.256.788911005
+DATA/oradb/datafile/sysaux.257.788911005
+DATA/oradb/datafile/undotbs1.258.788911005
+DATA/oradb/datafile/users.259.788911005
STANDBY DATABASE
SQL> select name from v$datafile;
NAME
+STDBY/oradb/datafile/system.256.788911005
+STDBY/oradb/datafile/sysaux.257.788911005
+STDBY/oradb/datafile/undotbs1.258.788911005
+STDBY/oradb/datafile/users.259.788911005
The Actual physical location of standby database files in ASM in standby server is shown below
ASMCMD> pwd
+STDBY/11gdb/DATAFILE
ASMCMD>
ASMCMD> ls
SYSAUX.259.805921967
SYSTEM.258.805921881
UNDOTBS1.260.805922023
USERS.261.805922029
ASMCMD>
ASMCMD> pwd
+STDBY/11gdb/DATAFILE
i even tried to rename the datafiles in standby database but it throws error
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01511: error in renaming log/data files
ORA-01275: Operation RENAME is not allowed if standby file management is
automatic.
Regards,
007

Hi saurabh,
I tried to rename the datafiles in standby database after restoring it throws the below error
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01511: error in renaming log/data files
ORA-01275: Operation RENAME is not allowed if standby file management is
automatic.
Also in my pfile i have mentioned the below parameters
*.db_create_file_dest='+STDBY'
*.db_domain=''
*.db_file_name_convert='+DATA','+STDBY'
*.db_name='ORADB'
*.db_unique_name='11GDB'
Regards,
007

Oracle.exe keeps locking a file after connection has been closed.

Hi,
I've written a windows service in .net that monitors a directory for new uploaded files that need to be synchronized with the database. When it detects a new file it moves the file to a another directory from which oracle can reach the file. When the file is moved. I open a connection with the database that performs a select * ... on the external table which reads the file. This all works like a charm and afterwards i dispose of the connection.
Then i try to move the file again to another directory because it has been processed, but then i got an System.IO.IOException because the file is locked by a process. When i check by which process it is oracle.exe and the lock stays untill i terminate my service. When i debug the service i double checked and the connection state is closed before i try to move it again. For some reason oracle.exe locks the file untill i kill the service that opened the connection.
If i need to give more specific information please ask, any help would be greatly appreciated.
Pieter

Do you see the same behavior is you select * from sqlplus instead of the odp app, but don't disconnect the sqlplus session?
ODP has pooling on by default, so even though you close and dispose the connection, the underlying hard connection stays open.
I dont know if there's a way to unlock the file without disconnecting which may be the ideal solution, but if not you could probably just disable connection pooling (set pooling=false in the connect string) to get around it.
Hope it helps,
Greg

Accessing the same database file using different handles/cursors

Will there be any problems accessing the same database file using different DB handles in a transactional environment? We have implemented a process which have multiple transient threads coming up and initiating DB opens and read/write operations to the same database file using different handles and cursors?
Can this potentially create any problems/bottlenecks? Can someone suggest the best way to deal with this scenario?
Thanks in advance.
SB

Hi,
Berkeley DB is well suited to the scenario you describe. You need to ensure that Berkeley DB is configured correctly for transactional access, the best information describing the requirements is in the Reference guide here:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E17076_02/html/programmer_reference/transapp.html
If there will be multiple threads operating concurrently, then you will need to design your application to detect and deal with deadlock situations.
Regards,
Alex Gorrod
Oracle Berkeley DB

Java.sql.SQLException: ORA-01157: cannot identify/lock data file 7 - see DB

I am deploying my application components on Oracle RAC database, when i install my app component i will run a script which creates a user and tablespace on bot rac-nodes(node1 and node2)
as database is clustered, the user are created on 2 nodes and tablespace is stored in a shared location for two rac nodes
i am able to successfully run my script on rac-node1 and and installed my component and when i started installing the app component on node2 getting error
java.sql.SQLException: ORA-01157: cannot identify/lock data file 7 - see DBWR trace file
ORA-01110: data file 7: '/db/db/db/ora10g/10.2.0/admin/dbadmin_01.dbf'
ORA-06512: at "ADMIN.XL_SP_DBCHECK", line 48
ORA-06512: at line 1
"dbadmin_01.dbf is the custom tablespace which created by me"
i a mgetting error while installing the app component on rac-node2

You should not create database files outside of the ASM.
I'm not sure you can move the datafile, I would export the data from the tablespace (if there is data you need there), delete the tablespace and recreate it in the ASM, then import the data back.
If you want to move the datafile, you can try using RMAN (from node1).
First connect to the database with sqlplus and execute:
alter tablespace <tbs_name> offline;Then start RMAN: rman target /
BACKUP AS COPY DATAFILE '<file>' FORMAT '+<ASM_DG>';Then in sqlplus, execute:
alter tablespace <tbs_name> online;I'm not sure it will work, and I hope I got the commands right because I can't check it right now.
Good luck
Liron Amitzi
Senior DBA consultant
[www.dbsnaps.com]
[www.orbiumsoftware.com]

Java.sql.SQLException: ORA-01157: cannot identify/lock data file : PLz Help

My datafiles are in ASM file system, however the only one file ACIPEN_DATA is the one, which is not in ASM file system, and this the file which is in concern.
We are getting the following exception in the lxkratgas1.lex1.lexmark.com when connecting to ACIPEN_DATA.
This exception is coming up sometimes and the sometimes the file is getting processed successfully
Caused by: java.sql.SQLException: ORA-01157: cannot identify/lock data file 9 - see DBWR trace file
ORA-01110: data file 9: '/oracle/SE/product/10.2.0/db_1/dbs/ACIPEN_DATA'
at oracle.jdbc.driver.DatabaseError.throwSqlException(DatabaseError.java:112)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CTTIoer.processError(T4CTTIoer.java:331)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CTTIoer.processError(T4CTTIoer.java:288)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4C8Oall.receive(T4C8Oall.java:743)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CPreparedStatement.doOall8(T4CPreparedStatement.java:216)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CPreparedStatement.executeForRows(T4CPreparedStatement.java:955)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleStatement.doExecuteWithTimeout(OracleStatement.java:1169)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.OraclePreparedStatement.executeInternal(OraclePreparedStatement.java:3285)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.OraclePreparedStatement.executeUpdate(OraclePreparedStatement.java:3368)
at org.jboss.resource.adapter.jdbc.WrappedPreparedStatement.executeUpdate(WrappedPreparedStatement.java:278)
at atg.adapter.gsa.SQLStatement.executeUpdate(SQLStatement.java:725)
at atg.adapter.gsa.Table.insert(Table.java:1378)
at atg.adapter.gsa.GSAItemDescriptor.addItem(GSAItemDescriptor.java:6272)
... 61 more
====================================================================
We have checked the datafile, it is absolutely online.
Can some expert jump in and resolve this issue Please.

01157, 00000, "cannot identify/lock data file %s - see DBWR trace file"
// *Cause: The background process was either unable to find one of the data
//         files or failed to lock it because the file was already in use.
//         The database will prohibit access to this file but other files will
//         be unaffected. However the first instance to open the database will
//         need to access all online data files. Accompanying error from the
//         operating system describes why the file could not be identified.
// *Action: Have operating system make file available to database. Then either
//         open the database or do ALTER SYSTEM CHECK DATAFILES.is this a RAC database?

Unable to open windows database files hosted on Lion Server

I use Mac Mini as a server. With Snow Leopard Server I shared files hosted on Mac Mini and other PC computers on the network could use together Access and Quickbooks files. After upgrading to Lion Server no PC is able to open these database files. E.g. when opening MS Access file hosted on Lion server following error pops up: "too many users acessing the file". However, the Access database can be open from network PC when opening in exclusive (single user) mode. Normal multiuser mode brings error.
Is it possible to solve this Lion sharing issue?

Same problem. Just fired up a new Mini with Lion Server to replace an HP Home Server because we need more than 10 users in our church now. Got all the users set up with group permissions and home directories on the server. Unfortunately I expected Lion Server to work just like Snow Leopard Server and be able to serve up ODBC databases like Access and Quickbooks files.
Anyone heard if Apple has a solution to the "too many users" error message? It appears that Access in particular attempts to open the data file and create a locking file (ldb), but cannot get the file permissions it needs from Lion.
Sorry I have no solution for all yet.

ORA-01157: cannot identify/lock data file 13 - see DBWR trace file

Hi all,
I've a Oracle Database 11g Release 11.1.0.6.0 - 64bit Production With the Real Application Clusters option.
I'm using ASM.
Yesterday I added new disks and then I changed the +/etc/udev/rules.d/98-oracle.rules+ file.
Now it looks like this (the bolded are the new ones):
# Oracle Configuration Registry
KERNEL=="emcpowerd1", OWNER="root", GROUP="oinstall", MODE="640", NAME="ocr"
# Voting Disks
KERNEL=="emcpowerr1", OWNER="oracle", GROUP="oinstall", MODE="640", NAME="voting"
# Spfile ASM+
KERNEL=="emcpowers1", OWNER="oracle", GROUP="dba", MODE="660", NAME="spfileASM"
# ASM Devices
KERNEL=="emcpowerj1", OWNER="oracle", GROUP="dba", MODE="660", NAME="asm0" #onlineredo asm disk
KERNEL=="emcpowern1", OWNER="oracle", GROUP="dba", MODE="660", NAME="asm1" #data asm disk
KERNEL=="emcpowerh1", OWNER="oracle", GROUP="dba", MODE="660", NAME="asm2" #data asm disk
KERNEL=="emcpowerq1", OWNER="oracle", GROUP="dba", MODE="660", NAME="asm3" #data asm disk
KERNEL=="emcpowere1", OWNER="oracle", GROUP="dba", MODE="660", NAME="asm4" #data asm disk
KERNEL=="emcpowerg1", OWNER="oracle", GROUP="dba", MODE="660", NAME="asm5" #data asm disk
KERNEL=="emcpowerl1", OWNER="oracle", GROUP="dba", MODE="660", NAME="asm6" #data asm disk
KERNEL=="emcpowero1", OWNER="oracle", GROUP="dba", MODE="660", NAME="asm7" #data asm disk
KERNEL=="emcpowerf1", OWNER="oracle", GROUP="dba", MODE="660", NAME="asm8" #data asm disk
KERNEL=="emcpowerm1", OWNER="oracle", GROUP="dba", MODE="660", NAME="asm9" #data asm disk
KERNEL=="emcpoweri1", OWNER="oracle", GROUP="dba", MODE="660", NAME="asm10" #data asm disk
KERNEL=="emcpowerp1", OWNER="oracle", GROUP="dba", MODE="660", NAME="asm11" #data asm disk
KERNEL=="emcpowerk1", OWNER="oracle", GROUP="dba", MODE="660", NAME="asm12" #data asm disk
KERNEL=="emcpowert", OWNER="oracle", GROUP="dba", MODE="660", NAME="asm210" #data asm disk SATA
KERNEL=="emcpowerc", OWNER="oracle", GROUP="dba", MODE="660", NAME="asm211" #data asm disk SATA
KERNEL=="emcpowerb", OWNER="oracle", GROUP="dba", MODE="660", NAME="asm212" #data asm disk SATA
KERNEL=="emcpowera", OWNER="oracle", GROUP="dba", MODE="660", NAME="asm213" #data asm disk SATA
It's the same on both RAC nodes.
The operating system, a RedHat 5.4, see the new devices (both nodes):
ls -ltr /dev/asm*
brw-rw---- 1 oracle dba 120, 16 May 18 10:03 /dev/asm212
brw-rw---- 1 oracle dba 120, 304 May 18 10:03 /dev/asm210
brw-rw---- 1 oracle dba 120, 32 May 18 10:03 /dev/asm211
brw-rw---- 1 oracle dba 120, 0 May 18 10:03 /dev/asm213
brw-rw---- 1 oracle dba 120, 209 May 18 10:05 /dev/asm1
brw-rw---- 1 oracle dba 120, 81 May 18 13:40 /dev/asm8
brw-rw---- 1 oracle dba 120, 97 May 18 13:40 /dev/asm5
brw-rw---- 1 oracle dba 120, 193 May 18 13:40 /dev/asm9
brw-rw---- 1 oracle dba 120, 161 May 18 13:40 /dev/asm12
brw-rw---- 1 oracle dba 120, 241 May 18 13:40 /dev/asm11
brw-rw---- 1 oracle dba 120, 177 May 18 13:40 /dev/asm6
brw-rw---- 1 oracle dba 120, 225 May 18 13:40 /dev/asm7
brw-rw---- 1 oracle dba 120, 65 May 18 13:40 /dev/asm4
brw-rw---- 1 oracle dba 120, 129 May 18 13:40 /dev/asm10
brw-rw---- 1 oracle dba 120, 257 May 18 13:40 /dev/asm3
brw-rw---- 1 oracle dba 120, 113 May 18 13:40 /dev/asm2
brw-rw---- 1 oracle dba 120, 145 May 18 13:40 /dev/asm0
Both ASM instance see new devices:
From ASM1
SQL*Plus: Release 11.1.0.6.0 - Production on Tue May 18 13:43:10 2010
Copyright (c) 1982, 2007, Oracle. All rights reserved.
Connected to:
Oracle Database 11g Release 11.1.0.6.0 - 64bit Production
With the Real Application Clusters option
SQL> select instance_name from v$instance;
INSTANCE_NAME
+ASM1
SQL> select path from v$asm_disk;
PATH
/dev/asm212
/dev/asm211
/dev/asm213
/dev/asm210
/dev/asm1
/dev/asm4
/dev/asm5
/dev/asm0
/dev/asm12
/dev/asm9
/dev/asm2
/dev/asm10
/dev/asm7
/dev/asm11
/dev/asm3
/dev/asm8
/dev/asm6
17 rows selected.
SQL>
From ASM2
SQL*Plus: Release 11.1.0.6.0 - Production on Tue May 18 13:42:39 2010
Copyright (c) 1982, 2007, Oracle. All rights reserved.
Connected to:
Oracle Database 11g Release 11.1.0.6.0 - 64bit Production
With the Real Application Clusters option
SQL> select instance_name from v$instance;
INSTANCE_NAME
+ASM2
SQL> select path from v$asm_disk;
PATH
/dev/asm213
/dev/asm211
/dev/asm210
/dev/asm212
/dev/asm8
/dev/asm7
/dev/asm6
/dev/asm11
/dev/asm4
/dev/asm12
/dev/asm5
/dev/asm9
/dev/asm1
/dev/asm3
/dev/asm10
/dev/asm2
/dev/asm0
17 rows selected.
SQL>
Then I created a disk group:
CREATE DISKGROUP STORE EXTERNAL REDUNDANCY DISK '/dev/asm210';
Then I created a new tablespace:
CREATE TABLESPACE store DATAFILE '+STORE';
I did all this operations from NODE1.
What is happening now is that everytime I try to read something from new diskgroup FROM NODE2 I get the ORA-01157:
ORA-01157: cannot identify/lock data file 13 - see DBWR trace file
ORA-01110: data file 13: '+STORE/evodb/datafile/store.256.719232707
No problem to read from NODE1.
The simple query on dba_data_file work from NODE1 and fails from NODE2 with the ORA-01157.
I found this on the alert log:
<msg time='2010-05-18T10:06:41.084+00:00' org_id='oracle' comp_id='rdbms'
client_id='' type='UNKNOWN' level='16'
module='' pid='11014'>
<txt>Errors in file /u01/app/oracle/diag/rdbms/evodb/EVODB2/trace/EVODB2_smon_11014.trc:
ORA-01157: cannot identify/lock data file 13 - see DBWR trace file
ORA-01110: data file 13: '+STORE/evodb/datafile/store.256.719232707'
</txt>
</msg>
And this from the trace:
Trace file /u01/app/oracle/diag/rdbms/evodb/EVODB2/trace/EVODB2_smon_11014.trc
Oracle Database 11g Release 11.1.0.6.0 - 64bit Production
With the Real Application Clusters option
ORACLE_HOME = /u01/app/oracle/product/11.1.0/db1
System name: Linux
Node name: node02
Release: 2.6.18-128.7.1.el5
Version: #1 SMP Wed Aug 19 04:00:49 EDT 2009
Machine: x86_64
Instance name: EVODB2
Redo thread mounted by this instance: 2
Oracle process number: 19
Unix process pid: 11014, image: oracle@node02 (SMON)
*** 2010-05-18 10:06:41.084
*** SESSION ID:(151.1) 2010-05-18 10:06:41.084
*** CLIENT ID:() 2010-05-18 10:06:41.084
*** SERVICE NAME:(SYS$BACKGROUND) 2010-05-18 10:06:41.084
*** MODULE NAME:() 2010-05-18 10:06:41.084
*** ACTION NAME:() 2010-05-18 10:06:41.084
DDE rules only execution for: ORA 1110
----- START Event Driven Actions Dump ----
---- END Event Driven Actions Dump ----
----- START DDE Actions Dump -----
----- DDE Action: 'DB_STRUCTURE_INTEGRITY_CHECK' (Async) -----
Successfully dispatched
----- (Action duration in csec: 0) -----
----- END DDE Actions Dump -----
*** 2010-05-18 10:06:41.084
SMON: following errors trapped and ignored:
ORA-01157: cannot identify/lock data file 13 - see DBWR trace file
ORA-01110: data file 13: '+STORE/evodb/datafile/store.256.719232707'
Any suggestion about how to solve the problem?
Thanks in advance!
Samuel

I didn't understand what do you mean with thread...
But I think you found the problem
Initialization files of both ASM instance are: SPFILE='/dev/spfileASM'
that SPFILE is (common for both):
+ASM2.__oracle_base='/u01/app/oracle'#ORACLE_BASE set from environment
+ASM2.asm_diskgroups='ONLINELOG','ARCHIVELOG','DATA'
+ASM1.asm_diskgroups='ONLINELOG','ARCHIVELOG','DATA','STORE'#Manual Mount
*.asm_diskstring='/dev/asm*'
*.cluster_database=true
*.diagnostic_dest='/u01/app/oracle'
+ASM1.instance_number=1
+ASM2.instance_number=2
*.instance_type='asm'
*.large_pool_size=12M
+ASM1.local_listener='LISTENER_ASM'
+AC
Then I executed another query:
From ASM1
SQL> select instance_name from v$instance;
INSTANCE_NAME
+ASM1
SQL> select name, state from v$asm_diskgroup;
NAME STATE
ARCHIVELOG MOUNTED
DATA MOUNTED
ONLINELOG MOUNTED
STORE MOUNTED
SQL>
From ASM2
SQL> select instance_name from v$instance;
INSTANCE_NAME
+ASM2
SQL> select name, state from v$asm_diskgroup;
NAME STATE
ARCHIVELOG MOUNTED
DATA MOUNTED
ONLINELOG MOUNTED
STORE DISMOUNTED
SQL>
Than the question is:
how can I mount the disk group STORE also on ASM2?
I think the problems is into the spfile lines:
+ASM2.asm_diskgroups='ONLINELOG','ARCHIVELOG','DATA'
+ASM1.asm_diskgroups='ONLINELOG','ARCHIVELOG','DATA','STORE'
How can I change the +ASM2.asm_diskgroups value?
Thanks

Host an ACT 6.0 database files on Mac OS X Server?

I have a client I am switching over. One of the last things we are dealing with is the ACT 6.0 CRM package. Long term, ACT will be replaced with another application such as DayLite. In the meantime, I need to retire aging server hardware and would like to replace it with a MacMini Server.
ACT 6.0 uses a file share for its database files. I assume it needs support for byte range record locking but I am not certain of this. At moment, the database is hosted on a CentOS 4 box and it works fine.
Will a similar arrangement work if the database is hosted on Mac OS Server OS?

I have read that Peachtree does "oddball things" if the sharepoint is not Full permissions. I have made this adjustment and will be testing this next Monday.

Error: ORA-00227 - Corrupt block detected in control file

Hey everybody,
I'm having problems with Oracle, here is the error displayed:
SQL> startup;
ORACLE instance started.
Total System Global Area 247463936 bytes
Fixed Size 1258244 bytes
Variable Size 92278012 bytes
Database Buffers 150994944 bytes
Redo Buffers 2932736 bytes
ORA-00227: corrupt block detected in control file: (block 16, # blocks 1)
ORA-00202: control file: '/usr/lib/oracle/xe/oradata/XE/control.dbf'
I wonder what I should do to solve this problem.
Could anyone help me?
Thanks

user10826800 wrote:
Hey everybody,
I'm having problems with Oracle, here is the error displayed:
SQL> startup;
ORACLE instance started.
Total System Global Area 247463936 bytes
Fixed Size 1258244 bytes
Variable Size 92278012 bytes
Database Buffers 150994944 bytes
Redo Buffers 2932736 bytes
ORA-00227: corrupt block detected in control file: (block 16, # blocks 1)
ORA-00202: control file: '/usr/lib/oracle/xe/oradata/XE/control.dbf'
I wonder what I should do to solve this problem.
Could anyone help me?
ThanksHi and welcome to the forum. Replace corrupted control file with non-corrupted one and start the database

Disconnected Analytics Sybase Specified database file already in use Error

Hi:
what do i have to configure on the OBI Disconnected Client, because any time i try to create an a request in answers iin my disconnected application i get the following error
Sybase][ODBC Driver][Adaptive Server Anywhere]Specified database file already in use. (HY000)
Do i have to create an ODBC connection? Which db do i have to point?
Thank in advanced
Cheers

Please see response in your ORA-27086: unable to lock file - already in use, Help

ORA-16795: database resource guard detects that database re-creation is req

Hi, I have Data Guard with data broker (Oracle 10.2.0.4) set up with RMAN and RMAN catalog. I was recovering my primary from a corrupted datafile, when automatic failover took place. After I did the recovery, I tried to re-instate my primary, but ran into the followign error:
Error: ORA-16795: database resource guard detects that database re-creation is requiredIn order to recreate the old primary (new standby), can I just delete all of the dbf files on old primary and then follow the steps to create a standby using backups from new primary? What about RMAN catalog? Do I have to unregister anything from there? Do I need to delete the configuration? If anyone has steps on how to RE-CREATE standby, that would be very helpful. Thank you!

I followed the above Metalink note, but when I try to restore standby controlfie I get:
RMAN> restore standby controlfile from '/data/backup/081409/';
Starting restore at 14-AUG-09
using channel ORA_DISK_1
RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
RMAN-00569: =============== ERROR MESSAGE STACK FOLLOWS ===============
RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
RMAN-03002: failure of restore command at 08/14/2009 08:53:23
RMAN-06172: no autobackup found or specified handle is not a valid copy or pieceMy directory structure is the same on both machines for primary and standby. I did not have autobackup set when I took primary's backup. I backed up primary in the following way:
backup database plus archivelog;
backup current controlfile for standby;Any ideas?

ASM diskgroups unmounting, getting ORA-01157: cannot identify/lock data fil

All,
We've recently purchased a RAMSAN device for better throughput. I created the initial diskgroup with the following syntax:
CREATE DISKGROUP EMTPRD0X_SSD01 NORMAL REDUNDANCY
FAILGROUP RS1 DISK '/dev/rdsk_ramsan_primary' NAME ssd_prim
FAILGROUP RS2 DISK '/dev/rdsk_ramsan_backup' NAME ssd_bkup;
and then created a temporary tablespace on top of that diskgroup:
create temporary tablespace temp04 tempfile '+EMTPRD0X_SSD01' size 25g, '+EMTPRD0X_SSD01' size 25g, '+EMTPRD0X_SSD01' size 25g, '+EMTPRD0X_SSD01' size 25g, '+EMTPRD0X_SSD01' size 25g;
Everything seemed fine at first and then end users started seeing the following errors in the alert log:
SUCCESS: diskgroup EMTPRD0X_SSD01 was mounted
SUCCESS: diskgroup EMTPRD0X_SSD01 was dismounted
SUCCESS: diskgroup EMTPRD0X_SSD01 was mounted
SUCCESS: diskgroup EMTPRD0X_SSD01 was dismounted
Tue Oct 12 16:12:51 2010
Errors in file /opt/oracle/oradump/emtprd02/udump/emtprd02_ora_11578.trc:
ORA-01157: cannot identify/lock data file 3009 - see DBWR trace file
ORA-01110: data file 3009: '+EMTPRD0X_SSD01/emtprd0x/tempfile/temp04.256.732210281'
After talking with Oracle support I was told that the only workaround for diskgroups unmounting themselves is to put a control file/redo log/dummy tablespace inside of that diskgroup and continually write/read from it.
Does that make sense?
They pointed me to note 603204.1 - Why FRA Diskgroup Gets Mounted/Dismounted.
The system is a 3 node Oracle 10.2.0.4 rac running on ASM Solaris x86 64bit.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Brian

Post Operating System (OS) name & version for DB server system.
Post results of
SELECT * from v$version
My db is not in archivelog mode poor choice
and no backup was taken. Worse choise
Is there any way I can recover this db? Recover as in no data loss?
Very doubtful.
Possible to open with data loss.
01157, 00000, "cannot identify/lock data file %s - see DBWR trace file"
// *Cause: The background process was either unable to find one of the data
//         files or failed to lock it because the file was already in use.
//         The database will prohibit access to this file but other files will
//         be unaffected. However the first instance to open the database will
//         need to access all online data files. Accompanying error from the
//         operating system describes why the file could not be identified.
// *Action: Have operating system make file available to database. Then either
//         open the database or do ALTER SYSTEM CHECK DATAFILES.What exactly cause this mess?
Edited by: sb92075 on Jan 7, 2010 8:59 PM

While generating a crystal report can we edit database files in field explorer ?

Hi,
while generating a crystal report can we edit database files in field explorer (at middle can we edit database fields)
Regards,
Mahendra

Wrong forum to post the question, try to post the question in crystal reports community.
Its not possible to edit the database fields while creating the reports, its only used to call the rows of values in it. Can you explain me in detail what are you actually looking for .
--SumanT

SQL and database file

Hello.(sorry for my english)
I have a legacy system , ported to opencobol that uses Berkeley DB. I can successfully open the database files using java both in windows and linux. However i want to create a web front end for the application.
Data is stored using strange cobol structures (most numbers are stored as text or 4 bits per digit) and other fancy stuff.. so custom parsers should be written. (dont rember BDB classes name for that)
I have been reading the documentation of Berkeley DB 12 hours totaly today but couldnt find answers to some questions...
Is it possible to attach the database to dbsql.exe (sqlite) server ?? I tried to do "attach "..pathtofile" as NULL ,but i get multiple databases specified and not supported and other stupid messages....
I think that what i tried propably doesnt make sense as collumns arent specified and nothing is in order this thing to work ..It is a simple Key value database.
So i am a little stucked here.
The only solution i can think is to synchronize with a relational Database. But i dont have triggers or nothing that helps....
Note that i want one way synchronization. The "other way" will have very limited tasks.
It seems to me that checking every x minutes if something changed using a cursor is a demanding task. So i am wondering.. Is there a way to track changes???
Thank you :)
Edited by: 843912 on 12 Μαρ 2011 7:13 μμ

Hello,
I am not sure I completely understand your question. If you are asking about importing
and exporting data from a Berkeley DB database into an Oracle DB Table in Berkeley DB
releases prior to 5.*, then this can be done with the Oracle OCI interface. If I am
misunderstanding the question, please let me know.
Thanks,
Sandra

Digikam - Detected locked database file

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for