Disable security rules in discoverer report

I have a discoverer report on GL with security rules applied, it displays data based on the responsibility thro which we have logged in. Users dont want this functionality, they want all the data to be displayed in a single reponsibility, which implies that the security rule be disabled for this report. The report doesnt have any custom folders and also I couldnt find anywhere the GL_SECURITY_PKG being called to implement security rules. Can anyone help me in disabling the security rules.

Hi,
Where did you look for the security rule? in the underlying objects or in the discoverer?
First thing you should do to see whether this rule is applied is from within the discoverer take the SQL (from the view-> sql inspector) and start analyzing the views in the from clause, i am sure that you'll find one of them that holds this rule.
If you are using oracle BA then for sure you'll find it in the "Journal Lines" folder (based on view : GLFG_JOURNAL_LINES)
Your request is not that simple as "Disable the security rule".
If you are using Oracle views then you cannot disable it without changing those views and you will have to verify you are not changing any of the views that the application uses.
If you will create a new responsibility for "Cross Set Of Books" then you can exclude it from the rule by changing the security rule from :
Gl_Security_Pkg.Validate_Access(Journal_Line.Set_Of_Books_Id,Journal_Line.Code_Combination_Id) = 'TRUE'
To something like:
decode(fnd_global.RESP_ID,<your new resp_id>,'TRUE',Gl_Security_Pkg.Validate_Access(Journal_Line.Set_Of_Books_Id,Journal_Line.Code_Combination_Id)) = 'TRUE'
If it is a specific request they have then you can create a new view and use the GL tables to avoid the usage of the GL security rule.
Tamir

Similar Messages

  • Disable security rule and remove assignment in GL

    Hi
    Need to know urgently as user is stuck in Journal entry
    There is an issue of overlapping two restrictions while entering department in accounting flexfield and the security rules needs to be disabled.
    Rule 1 Name : Department Security
    Message : Department Security: Department is restricted to 110 thru 130
    Include is 000 to zzz
    Exclude is 000 to 109
    Exculde is 131 to zzz
    Rule 2 Name : Single Department
    Single Department: Department is restricted to ONLY department 110
    Include is 000 to zzz
    Exclude is 000 to 109
    Exculde is 111 to zzz
    Need help to disable the rules and allow all departments now for user entry
    Thanks
    Shanks
    Edited by: user8364817 on Dec 3, 2008 10:10 PM

    Hi
    Thank you for your reply.
    I also tried replacing all by "include" and it worked !!!
    Hope this will not have any issues further.
    The user is able to make entries using all departments now
    Thanks
    Shanks

  • GL_SECURITY_PKG - R12 Discoverer Reporting - Production Service Unusable

    Hi,
    We have followed the following note for our R12 upgrade:
    R12 Discoverer Reports: Gl_security_pkg.Validate_access Reports Not Working [ID 804113.1]
    We set the system profile option: Initialization 'SQL Statement - Custom' for the responsibility to the value 'Begin GL_SECURITY_PKG.init(); end;'
    This corrected our problem, and correctly maintained the GL Security Rules in our Discoverer reports.
    But since going live in Production, the service is almost unusable because it is causing severe performance with 400 redo logs being generated an hour with calls to the table GL_BIS_SEGVAL_INT. The minute we remove the profile options the service performance is back to normal, but we have no GL Security Rules in Discoverer.
    Please can anyone advise/help if they have experienced this before, or can help with an alternative solution?
    Many thanks,
    Gary

    But since going live in Production, the service is almost unusable because it is causing severe performance with 400 redo logs being generated an hour with calls to the table GL_BIS_SEGVAL_INT. The minute we remove the profile options the service performance is back to normal, but we have no GL Security Rules in Discoverer.Please see (User Logins And Session Timeout. Massive Archive Entries in GL_BIS_SEGVAL_INT. [ID 733672.1).
    Please can anyone advise/help if they have experienced this before, or can help with an alternative solution?If the solution in this doc does not help, then please log a SR.Thanks,Hussein                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               

  • Standard Oracle report for the "security rules define/assign"

    Dear all:
    Is there any Standard Oracle report to show the :"Application --> Setup : Financials : Flexfields : Key : Security " flexfield "security rules define/assign" ?
    Regards
    Terry
    Edited by: Terry Chen on 2010/5/4 上午 2:27

    yes i believe there is one report in sysadmin or gl which shows this.

  • IIS MP - Enabling Rules and Discoveries that are Disabled by Default

    Dears,
    In the IIS MP Guide they are asking to Enabling Rules and Discoveries that are Disabled by Default.
    For below:
    DotNetCLRMemoryPercentageOfTimeInGC                                                                       
    Failed.To.Perform.Initialization.Of.IIS.Discovery.Module
    Failed.To.Perform.Web.Application.Discovery
    Failed.To.Perform.Web.Server.Properties.Discovery
    Failed.To.Perform.Web.Site.Discovery
    FailedToFindApplicationPoolWhileRetrievingState
    FailedToFindSiteWhileAttemptingToRetrieveState
    FailedToPerformApplicationPoolDiscovery
    FailedToPerformFTPServerDiscovery
    FailedToPerformFTPSiteDiscovery
    FailedToPerformIISComponentDiscoveryDueInsufficientPrivs
    FailedToPerformInitializationOfIISStateMonitoringModule
    FailedToRetrieveSiteState
    FailledToRetrieveApplicationPoolState
    I was not able to determine where I have to enable, please check snapshot:
    Question 1: For this IIS MP Guide, Shall I enable all of what I get in the photo?
    and the second doubt is about next snapshot:
    Question 2: Where shall I override?
    Thanks

    The base class the rule is targetting is "Health Service" (see the "inherited from" column, that lists the class you'll want to override for provided you want to do an override for all the objects the rule is targetting, which is what it
    sounds like you want). When you choose "override the rule" for that one it should say "for all objects of class: Health Servcie". Overriding that will override for everything the rule is targetting. You should be able to follow this logic for the rest
    of them as well.

  • USER UNABLE TO REFRESH DISCOVERER REPORT IN DISCOVERER DESKTOP 10g

    Dear All,
    HELP!!!
    A new user is unable to refresh discoverer Reports in Desktop. All priviledges have been granted to username in Disco Admin and Usre is able to log into oracle Apps.
    On the PC the user logged into someone else can log into Discoverer Desktop and run/refresh discoverer reports without any issues. Hence Ithink neither the PC nor the Discoverer installation is the problem.
    Can anyone help? What setup/profile needs to be completed in order for the user to be able to run Disco reports.
    Pls note that the following has been completed:
    1. Business Areas Assigned to user and his responsibilities.
    2. Desktop/Plus Privileges assigned.
    3. Allow administration - DISABLED - NOT TICKED
    Many thx
    DI

    Does this person just need to run reports? Or does this person also need to create reports? If the person just needs to run reports, try using Viewer for that person, rather than Desktop. This may be something that you need to log a service request with Oracle to get resolved. Pretty strange that can bring items into a new worksheet, but it won't run. Maybe there is an Oracle applications security issue (since logging in as another person does work)? You may be beating your brains out trying to find a Discoverer problem when it might be an application security problem. Though this is a wild guess on my part.
    John Dickey

  • How to achieve Tab level security in a WEBI report?

    hi,
    I have 2 tabs in a single Webi XI R3 report. This report should be viewed by 2 users with the following conditions.
    1st Tab should be seen by only User #1. (Tab 2 should be disabled)
    2nd Tab should be seen by only User #2. (Tab 1 should be disabled)
    How can we achieve this?
    Regards,
    Vamsee

    It is not possible to provide security on a report tab, only the document itself. Making it a requirement doesn't change the features of the product.
    If the two tabs are showing data in different formats, then using two different reports is the way to go. If the report tabs are showing the same format but different data (content) then you can apply filters or security rules in the universe itself to restrict data to what User 1 and User 2 are allowed to see.

  • Oracle 10g Discoverer Reports & export to xls fails for large reports

    Hi ,
    We have following configurations:
    1: RHEL 5.4
    2: Discoverer :Version 10.1.2.48.18
    3: Oracle10g Apps Version : Version 10.1.2.0.2
    Issue:
    Most of small reports works fine ....but when large discoverer reports are executed the page
    keeps on refreshing for 15-20 hours but no output ....same for export to xls ......
    But same reports works fine in oracle9i for same data voulme....
    Observations:
    When on linux with top command the processes are monitored its observed that discoverer process
    dis51ws dies for large reports after 1-2 minutes ...& the page keeps on refreshing but no output....
    for 1-2 minutes it consumes 50-80% cpu utilisation then process disappears & cpu 80% idle ...
    It seems that as 10g Apps is installed on RHEL 5.4 ...non certfified OS causing an issue...
    Can any one adds more inputs in this regards......
    we have checked logs : below are log details :
    Below logs gives "Logkeys: exceptions discoiv.servlet_exceptions" for this report ...
    1:
    OC4J~OC4J_BI_Forms~default_island~1:
    10/04/11 12:11:29 Oracle Application Server Containers for J2EE 10g (10.1.2.0.2) initialized
    10/04/11 12:11:59 Using oracle.reports.util.EnvironmentGlobal class
    10/04/11 14:23:37 Logkeys: exceptions discoiv.servlet_exceptions
    10/04/11 14:23:38 Discoverer Model - 10.1.2.48.18
    Session ID:2010041114240115278
    10/04/11 14:25:42 Logkeys: exceptions discoiv.servlet_exceptions
    10/04/11 14:25:42 Discoverer Model - 10.1.2.48.18
    Session ID:2010041114254315439
    10/04/11 14:28:53 Logkeys: exceptions discoiv.servlet_exceptions
    10/04/11 14:28:54 Discoverer Model - 10.1.2.48.18
    Session ID:2010041114285615691
    10/04/11 14:29:13 Logkeys: exceptions discoiv.servlet_exceptions
    10/04/11 14:29:13 Discoverer Model - 10.1.2.48.18
    Session ID:2010041114291315728
    10/04/11 14:32:35 Logkeys: exceptions discoiv.servlet_exceptions
    10/04/11 14:32:35 Discoverer Model - 10.1.2.48.18
    Session ID:2010041114323615949
    10/04/11 14:32:48 Logkeys: exceptions discoiv.servlet_exceptions
    10/04/11 14:32:48 Discoverer Model - 10.1.2.48.18
    Session ID:2010041114324815982
    10/04/11 14:34:44 Logkeys: exceptions discoiv.servlet_exceptions
    10/04/11 14:34:44 Discoverer Model - 10.1.2.48.18
    Session ID:2010041114344616128
    10/04/11 14:34:55 Logkeys: exceptions discoiv.servlet_exceptions
    10/04/11 14:34:55 Discoverer Model - 10.1.2.48.18
    Session ID:2010041114345516155
    10/04/11 14:36:25 Tutalii: /oracle10gas/app/oracle10g/discoverer/lib/discoverer5.jar archive
    2:
    Discoverer~SessionServer~12
    Calling GetData on Preference Repository
    Calling GetData on Preference Repository
    Calling GetData on Preference Repository
    Calling GetData on Preference Repository
    Active Eul: EULADMIN
    Calling GetData on Preference Repository
    Calling GetData on Preference Repository
    Calling GetData on Preference Repository
    Calling GetData on Preference Repository
    Calling GetData on Preference Repository
    Calling GetData on Preference Repository
    Calling GetData on Preference Repository
    DCSCORBAInterface::Delete called
    DCSCORBAInterface destructor called
    DCSCORBAInterface::Delete called
    DCSCORBAInterface destructor called
    ASSERT [email protected]:436
    ASSERT [email protected]:436
    ASSERT [email protected]:436
    ASSERT [email protected]:436
    ASSERT [email protected]:436
    ASSERT [email protected]:436
    ASSERT [email protected]:436
    ASSERT [email protected]:436
    ASSERT [email protected]:436
    ASSERT [email protected]:436
    ASSERT [email protected]:436
    ASSERT [email protected]:436
    ASSERT [email protected]:436
    3:
    application.log
    10/04/11 14:37:25 discoverer: [TRACE] [AJPRequestHandler-ApplicationServerThread-17] oracle.discoverer.applications.framework.ApplicationController.execute Finding async request action forward
    10/04/11 14:37:25 discoverer: [TRACE] [AJPRequestHandler-ApplicationServerThread-17] oracle.discoverer.applications.framework.ApplicationController.execute Calling externalize
    10/04/11 14:37:25 discoverer: [DEBUG] [AJPRequestHandler-ApplicationServerThread-17] oracle.discoverer.applications.viewer.model.WorksheetModel.getStateString EXT_TOOL: dvtb xk-1ml versionzw1.0w kyxdvtbyxbisltyxbicho vzwwjyxjbisltyxjdvtby
    10/04/11 14:37:25 discoverer: [DEBUG] [AJPRequestHandler-ApplicationServerThread-17] oracle.discoverer.applications.viewer.model.WorksheetModel.getStateString EXT_VIEW: dv xk-1ml versionzw1.0w kyxdv bazw0w cszw25wyxpc vzw1wjyxjdvy
    10/04/11 14:37:25 discoverer: [DEBUG] [AJPRequestHandler-ApplicationServerThread-17] oracle.discoverer.applications.viewer.model.WorksheetModel.getStateString EXT_VIEW: lc
    10/04/11 14:37:25 discoverer: [DEBUG] [AJPRequestHandler-ApplicationServerThread-17] oracle.discoverer.applications.viewer.model.WorksheetModel.getStateString EXT_HS: dvhs
    10/04/11 14:37:25 discoverer: [DEBUG] [AJPRequestHandler-ApplicationServerThread-17] oracle.discoverer.applications.viewer.model.WorksheetModel.getStateString EXT_DS: dv_ds &qls_z!2=New GL Report.Clndr Id&arq=false&qls_x!14=Sheet 1.Closing Balance (Credit)&qls_x!3=New GL Report.Voucher No&qls_z!3=New GL Report.Frm Prd&fm=xml&qls_z!4=New GL Report.To Prd&qls_x!2=New GL Report.Prd Desc&qls_x!11=Sheet 1.Debit Amount&qls_x!4=New GL Report.Gl Voucher No&qls_x!9=Sheet 1.Opening Balance Debit&tss_s!0=New GL Report.Acct Id,lh,group,false&qls_x!1=New GL Report.Acct Sdesc&qls_z!1=New GL Report.Loc Desc&qls_x!10=Sheet 1.Opening Balance (Credit)&qls_x!12=Sheet 1.Credit Amount&aow=false&qls_x!7=New GL Report.Shrt Code&qls_x!13=Sheet 1.Closing Balance (Debit)&qls_x!6=New GL Report.Pmt Rct Dt&qls_x!8=New GL Report.Dtl Nrtn&sss=true&qls_x!5=New GL Report.Voucher Dt&qls_x!0=New GL Report.Acct Id&qls_z!0=New GL Report.Loc Id&ddsver=1
    10/04/11 14:37:25 discoverer: [DEBUG] [AJPRequestHandler-ApplicationServerThread-17] oracle.discoverer.applications.viewer.model.ViewerModelImpl.externalize [EXTERN_STATE]: $wksht$%24dv_ds%24%26qls_z%212%3DNew+GL+Report.Clndr+Id%26arq%3Dfalse%26qls_x%2114%3DSheet+1.Closing+Balance+%28Credit%29%26qls_x%213%3DNew+GL+Report.Voucher+No%26qls_z%213%3DNew+GL+Report.Frm+Prd%26fm%3Dxml%26qls_z%214%3DNew+GL+Report.To+Prd%26qls_x%212%3DNew+GL+Report.Prd+Desc%26qls_x%2111%3DSheet+1.Debit+Amount%26qls_x%214%3DNew+GL+Report.Gl+Voucher+No%26qls_x%219%3DSheet+1.Opening+Balance+Debit%26tss_s%210%3DNew+GL+Report.Acct+Id%2Clh%2Cgroup%2Cfalse%26qls_x%211%3DNew+GL+Report.Acct+Sdesc%26qls_z%211%3DNew+GL+Report.Loc+Desc%26qls_x%2110%3DSheet+1.Opening+Balance+%28Credit%29%26qls_x%2112%3DSheet+1.Credit+Amount%26aow%3Dfalse%26qls_x%217%3DNew+GL+Report.Shrt+Code%26qls_x%2113%3DSheet+1.Closing+Balance+%28Debit%29%26qls_x%216%3DNew+GL+Report.Pmt+Rct+Dt%26qls_x%218%3DNew+GL+Report.Dtl+Nrtn%26sss%3Dtrue%26qls_x%215%3DNew+GL+Report.Voucher+Dt%26qls_x%210%3DNew+GL+Report.Acct+Id%26qls_z%210%3DNew+GL+Report.Loc+Id%26ddsver%3D1%24dv%24xk-1ml+versionzw1.0w+kyxdv+bazw0w+cszw25wyxpc+vzw1wjyxjdvy%24wd%24false%24lc%24%24dvtb%24xk-1ml+versionzw1.0w+kyxdvtbyxbisltyxbicho+vzwwjyxjbisltyxjdvtby%24wvs%241101%24dvhs%24$cn$&vct=svd&cnk=cf_a101$ap$%26df%3D%26l%3D%26s%3D%26nc%3D%26dl%3D$expl$&sp=&node=&event=focus&state=(117)&root=63&wbt=2$prid$NEW_GL_REPORT%2F31$ctyp$viewer
    10/04/11 14:37:25 discoverer: [TRACE] [AJPRequestHandler-ApplicationServerThread-17] oracle.discoverer.applications.framework.ApplicationController.execute Storing state
    10/04/11 14:37:25 discoverer: [INFO] [AJPRequestHandler-ApplicationServerThread-17] oracle.discoverer.applications.framework.ApplicationController.execute Externalize Perf: 8ms
    10/04/11 14:37:25 discoverer: [TRACE] [AJPRequestHandler-ApplicationServerThread-17] oracle.discoverer.applications.framework.ApplicationController.execute Saving Attributes
    10/04/11 14:37:25 discoverer: [TRACE] [AJPRequestHandler-ApplicationServerThread-17] oracle.discoverer.applications.framework.ApplicationController.execute Saving ApplicationRequest
    10/04/11 14:37:25 discoverer: [TRACE] [AJPRequestHandler-ApplicationServerThread-17] oracle.discoverer.applications.framework.ApplicationController.execute Checking for SSO mode
    10/04/11 14:37:25 discoverer: [TRACE] [AJPRequestHandler-ApplicationServerThread-17] oracle.discoverer.applications.framework.ApplicationController.execute Saving errors, messages
    10/04/11 14:37:25 discoverer: [DEBUG] [AJPRequestHandler-ApplicationServerThread-17] oracle.discoverer.applications.framework.ApplicationController.execute Returning final forward: "/ExportProgress.uix" redirect: "false"
    10/04/11 14:37:25 discoverer: [TRACE] [AJPRequestHandler-ApplicationServerThread-17] oracle.discoverer.applications.framework.ApplicationController.execute ----------------------- End Request --------------------------
    10/04/11 14:37:25 discoverer: [INFO] [AJPRequestHandler-ApplicationServerThread-17] oracle.discoverer.applications.framework.ApplicationController.execute Total Request Time in AppCtrl: 18
    10/04/11 14:37:25 discoverer: [DEBUG] [AJPRequestHandler-ApplicationServerThread-17] org.apache.struts.action.RequestProcessor.processForwardConfig processForwardConfig(ForwardConfig[name=long running operation,path=/ExportProgress.uix,redirect=false,contextRelative=false])
    10/04/11 14:37:25 discoverer: [DEBUG] [AJPRequestHandler-ApplicationServerThread-17] oracle.discoverer.applications.viewer.view.DiscovererPageBroker.isCacheable Setting cacheable to: true
    4: XML log:
    log2010041114285615691.xml
    <MSG_GROUP>DCS</MSG_GROUP> <PROCESS_ID>15691</PROCESS_ID> <FILE_NAME>dcstim.cpp</FILE_NAME> <LINE_NUMBER>184</LINE_NUMBER> <THREAD_ID>-1283799360</THREAD_ID> <LOG_TIME>Sun Apr 11 14:29:13 2010
    </LOG_TIME> ]]>
    </SUPPL_DETAIL> </PAYLOAD> </MESSAGE>
    <MESSAGE><HEADER><TSTZ_ORIGINATING>2010-04-11T14:29:13+00:00</TSTZ_ORIGINATING> <COMPONENT_ID>DISCOVER</COMPONENT_ID> <MSG_TYPE TYPE="NOTIFICATION"></MSG_TYPE><MSG_LEVEL>4</MSG_LEVEL> <HOST_ID>2010041114285615691</HOST_ID> <MODULE_ID>DCS</MODULE_ID> </HEADER> <PAYLOAD><MSG_TEXT><![CDATA[Timer started.]]></MSG_TEXT> <SUPPL_DETAIL><![CDATA[
    <MSG_GROUP>DCS</MSG_GROUP> <PROCESS_ID>15691</PROCESS_ID> <FILE_NAME>dcstim.cpp</FILE_NAME> <LINE_NUMBER>162</LINE_NUMBER> <THREAD_ID>-1283799360</THREAD_ID> <LOG_TIME>Sun Apr 11 14:29:13 2010
    </LOG_TIME> ]]>
    </SUPPL_DETAIL> </PAYLOAD> </MESSAGE>
    <MESSAGE><HEADER><TSTZ_ORIGINATING>2010-04-11T14:29:13+00:00</TSTZ_ORIGINATING> <COMPONENT_ID>DISCOVER</COMPONENT_ID> <MSG_TYPE TYPE="TRACE"></MSG_TYPE><MSG_LEVEL>5</MSG_LEVEL> <HOST_ID>2010041114285615691</HOST_ID> <MODULE_ID>DCS</MODULE_ID> </HEADER> <PAYLOAD><MSG_TEXT><![CDATA[Return DCSModelInterface::SendReceiveData(kScheduleInterface, inTable, outTable)
    outTable = DCITable
         Length=0
    ]]></MSG_TEXT> <SUPPL_DETAIL><![CDATA[
    <MSG_GROUP>DCS</MSG_GROUP> <PROCESS_ID>15691</PROCESS_ID> <FILE_NAME>dcsmdli.cpp</FILE_NAME> <LINE_NUMBER>259</LINE_NUMBER> <THREAD_ID>-1283799360</THREAD_ID> <LOG_TIME>Sun Apr 11 14:29:13 2010
    </LOG_TIME> ]]>
    </SUPPL_DETAIL> </PAYLOAD> </MESSAGE>
    <MESSAGE><HEADER><TSTZ_ORIGINATING>2010-04-11T14:29:13+00:00</TSTZ_ORIGINATING> <COMPONENT_ID>DISCOVER</COMPONENT_ID> <MSG_TYPE TYPE="NOTIFICATION"></MSG_TYPE><MSG_LEVEL>4</MSG_LEVEL> <HOST_ID>2010041114285615691</HOST_ID> <MODULE_ID>DCS</MODULE_ID> </HEADER> <PAYLOAD><MSG_TEXT><![CDATA[DCSModelInterface::SendReceiveData(kScheduleInterface)]]></MSG_TEXT> <SUPPL_DETAIL><![CDATA[
    <MSG_GROUP>DCS </MSG_GROUP> <PROCESS_ID>15691</PROCESS_ID> <FILE_NAME>dcsmdli.cpp</FILE_NAME> <LINE_NUMBER>226</LINE_NUMBER> <THREAD_ID>-1283799360</THREAD_ID> <LOG_TIME>Sun Apr 11 14:29:13 2010
    </LOG_TIME> <LOG_SIZE>0</LOG_SIZE> <EXTRA_INFO><MethodEnd duration="0.1" sizeChange="0" >
    real 0m0.1s
    user 0m0.900s
    sys 0m0.109s
    </MethodEnd></EXTRA_INFO> ]]>
    </SUPPL_DETAIL> </PAYLOAD> </MESSAGE>
    <MESSAGE><HEADER><TSTZ_ORIGINATING>2010-04-11T14:37:13+00:00</TSTZ_ORIGINATING> <COMPONENT_ID>DISCOVER</COMPONENT_ID> <MSG_TYPE TYPE="NOTIFICATION"></MSG_TYPE><MSG_LEVEL>4</MSG_LEVEL> <HOST_ID>2010041114285615691</HOST_ID> <MODULE_ID>DCS</MODULE_ID> </HEADER> <PAYLOAD><MSG_TEXT><![CDATA[Timer stopped.]]></MSG_TEXT> <SUPPL_DETAIL><![CDATA[
    <MSG_GROUP>DCS</MSG_GROUP> <PROCESS_ID>15691</PROCESS_ID> <FILE_NAME>dcstim.cpp</FILE_NAME> <LINE_NUMBER>184</LINE_NUMBER> <THREAD_ID>-1283799360</THREAD_ID> <LOG_TIME>Sun Apr 11 14:37:13 2010
    </LOG_TIME> ]]>
    </SUPPL_DETAIL> </PAYLOAD> </MESSAGE>
    <MESSAGE><HEADER><TSTZ_ORIGINATING>2010-04-11T14:37:13+00:00</TSTZ_ORIGINATING> <COMPONENT_ID>DISCOVER</COMPONENT_ID> <MSG_TYPE TYPE="NOTIFICATION"></MSG_TYPE><MSG_LEVEL>4</MSG_LEVEL> <HOST_ID>2010041114285615691</HOST_ID> <MODULE_ID>DCS</MODULE_ID> </HEADER> <PAYLOAD><MSG_TEXT><![CDATA[Timer started.]]></MSG_TEXT> <SUPPL_DETAIL><![CDATA[
    <MSG_GROUP>DCS</MSG_GROUP> <PROCESS_ID>15691</PROCESS_ID> <FILE_NAME>dcstim.cpp</FILE_NAME> <LINE_NUMBER>162</LINE_NUMBER> <THREAD_ID>-1283799360</THREAD_ID> <LOG_TIME>Sun Apr 11 14:37:13 2010
    </LOG_TIME> ]]>
    </SUPPL_DETAIL> </PAYLOAD> </MESSAGE>
    Regards,

    Hi ,
    as per Note: 466697.1 ....its an memory error....& need to increase MaxVirtualDiskMem and MaxVirtualHeapMem
    But we already have slowly increased MaxVirtualDiskMem and MaxVirtualHeapMem to below very high values ...but the issue remains same.......
    as per note we are getting Logkeys: exceptions discoiv.servlet_exceptions error but
    after that we are not getting below error ............
    Unexpected error in state machine: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError
    Hence I presume that its different issue rather than memmory....
    Below are pref.txt values..........
    CacheFlushPercentage          = 25          # Percent of cache flushed if the cache is full. valid values 0 - 100%.
    MaxVirtualDiskMem          = 9294967296     # Maximum amount of disk memory allowed for the data cache. Should be greater than or equal to MaxVirtualHeapMem
    MaxVirtualHeapMem          = 4294967296     # Maximum amount of heap memory allowed for the data cache.
    QueryBehavior = 0          # Action to take after opening a workbook (0 = Run Query Automatically, 1 = Don't Run Query, 2 = Ask for Confirmation)
    Also we have raised an SR & as per SR .............all below settings are tried as per SR except for applying a recent patch....
    ====================================================================
    Discoverer performance is largely determined by how well the database
    has been designed and tuned for queries.
    A well-designed database will perform significantly better than a poorly
    designed database.
    Workbook design can also affect query performance.
    1. Apply latest Discoverer patch as documented in <<Note:237607.1>>
    'ALERT: Required and Recommended Patch Levels For All Discoverer Version'.
    2. Increase the maximum JVM heap memory:
    In general, the default values for the minimum heap (-Xms) memory and
    maximum heap (-Xmx) memory are sufficient.
    However, if your organization consistently runs large Discoverer queries
    then you may benefit from increasing the maximum heap memory from the
    default values.
    This is recomended if your users are typically running large queries via
    Discoverer Viewer.
    Increasing the JVM memory can help to avoid "java.lang.OutOfMemoryError"
    in Discoverer Viewer:
    Please see <<Note 563960.1>>, Best Practice: Configuring The
    OC4J_BI_Forms JVM For
    Discoverer Viewer/Portlet 10g Performance And Stability for specific
    details.
    3. Disable Query Prediction:
    Query Prediction provides an estimate of the time required to retrieve
    the information in a query.
    The Query Prediction appears before the query and consumes time.
    Edit the <oracle_home>/discoverer/util/pref.txt on the middle-tier
    server and set:
    QPPEnable=0
    Also set:
    QPPObtainCostMethod = 0
    4. Uncheck the 'Enable fantrap detection' checkbox.
    When the box is checked, every query generated by Discoverer is
    interrogated. Discoverer will detect a fan trap and rewrite the query to
    ensure that the aggregation is done at the correct level.
    Please refer to <<Note:210553.1>>, Oracle BI Discoverer: Fan Trap
    Resolution - Correct Results
    Everytime for more information on fantraps.
    To disable, in Plus go to Tools -> Options -> Advanced -> Fan Trap
    settings.
    In Viewer go to Preferences and uncheck the box.
    5. Disable Materialized Views/Summaries
    In pref.txt add parameter:
    MaterializedViewRedirectionBehavior = 0
    Value equal to 0 ensures that Materialized View (MV) Redirection is
    always performed when MVs are available.
    6. Improve query performance by optimizing the SQL.
    In pref.txt modify/add following parameters:
    SQLFlatten = 0
    SQLItemTrim = 0
    SQLJoinTrim = 0
    UseOptimizerHints = 0
    If value of SQLFlatten is 1 then Discoverer will merge inline views in
    the query SQL where ever possible.
    In case of SQLItemTrim, Discoverer will remove unused folder items from
    the query SQL where possible and for SQLJoinTrim Discoverer will remove
    unnecessary joins from the query where possible.
    UseOptimizerHints will add Optimizer hints to SQL if set >
    0.Unnecessarily making Discoverer perform these checks consumes
    resources and rather than increasing the performance may reduce the same. So unless you feel these checks have to be performed depending on
    requirements, assign zero to these parameters.
    7. When Discoverer builds a query, Discoverer makes a database security
    check to confirm that the user has access to the tables referenced in
    the folders. Avoiding this check can save time.
    So in pref.txt underDatabase section add:
    ObjectsAlwaysAccessible = 1
    8. Whenever you are creating conditions, ensure that you match the Case.
    This in turn can reduce the time Discoverer spends on changing the Case
    and matching.
    For example:
    option Upper(Department) in (Upper('VIDEO SALES')
    9. Ensure that summaries are refreshed periodically in Discoverer
    Administrator.
    10. Increase the amount of memory available for the Discoverer data cache. Please refer to <<Note 245752.1>>, Explaining Oracle BI Discoverer
    Session Memory Management
    And Server Cache Settings.
    11. Performance may be enhanced by enabling OracleAS Web Cache.
    ==================================================================
    Thanks for your reply....................
    Regards,

  • Security rules in apps EUL

    Hi,
    It is possible to implement in apps EUL security rules set for Key Flexfield? If yes, how do that?
    rgds,
    Krystian

    Hi Krystian,
    What you want to do is possible and can be achieved by using the GL_SECURITY_PKG in the chosen view. The view will need to include the following condition: gl_security_pkg.validate_access(sob_id, ccid) = 'TRUE'’
    Once your view is setup and ready, you’ll need to create your Key-Flexfield security rules and assign them to a Responsibility. Users will need to run the report under that responsibility for it to work.
    Some links for handy reading regarding using the GL_SECURITY_PKG:
    Re: Speeding up or Caching the gl_security_pkg.validate_access(sob_id, ccid)
    Re: Free Discoverer views for Financials, or BIS?
    Hope this helps ;-)
    Lance

  • Discoverer Report  returning ' no data  found '

    Hi  ...
    i  have an issue with one discoverer  report  .
    Discoverer report  name : EDI Price Exception Report.
    when i ran the report  in Discoverer  Desktop edition  It is returning 'No Data Found ' But  i am taken the  Query from admin edition  and tried to  ran in  PL/SQL Developer/TOAD  by setting  Org_id condition
    it's returning Data  . the Desktop Edition of Discoverer for  some specific date  Range  it's giving Data  But  from last month on wards  it's not returning any Data.
    in Discoverer Report  Desktop  it's not retuning the Data from  November to till date
    Oracle  Applications  11i
    Discoverer 4i
    Oracle Data base :9i 
    OS : Windows.
    Attached the Sql  which i used to generate the Report :
    I HAVE USED THE FOLLOWING  :-for initialize the profile options
    EXEC FND_GLOBAL.APPS_INITIALIZE (0,52163,660);
    EXEC APPS.FND_CLIENT_INFO.SET_ORG_CONTEXT(2922);
      SELECT A.CUST_PO_NUMBER,
             A.ORDER_NUMBER,
             A.ORDERED_DATE,
             A.ORDER_TYPE,
             -- C.CUSTOMER_ID,
             C.CUSTOMER_NUMBER,
             C.CUSTOMER_NAME,
             B.LINE_NUMBER,
             B.ORDERED_ITEM,
             MSI.SEGMENT1 ACCO_ITEM,                               -- GRW 20060407
             MSI.DESCRIPTION,
             -- MSI.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID,
             (SELECT MCI.CUSTOMER_ITEM_NUMBER
                FROM MTL_CUSTOMER_ITEMS MCI,
                     MTL_CUSTOMER_ITEM_XREFS MCIX,
                     MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_B MSIB
               --  MTL_PARAMETERS          MP
               WHERE     MCI.CUSTOMER_ID = C.CUSTOMER_ID                 --1814924
                     AND MCI.CUSTOMER_ITEM_ID = MCIX.CUSTOMER_ITEM_ID
                     AND MCIX.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID = MSIB.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID
                     AND MSIB.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID = MSI.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID   --869899
                     AND MSIB.ORGANIZATION_ID = MTP.ORGANIZATION_ID --MP.ORGANIZATION_ID
                     AND MTP.ORGANIZATION_CODE = 'BRM'
                     AND MCI.CUSTOMER_ITEM_NUMBER = B.ORDERED_ITEM
                     AND NVL (mci.inactive_flag, 'N') <> 'Y'
                     AND NVL (mcix.inactive_flag, 'N') <> 'Y')
                CUSTOMER_ITEM,
                     XXAB_ITEM_XREFS.GET_GBC_ITEM_NUM (B.ORDERED_ITEM) GBC_ITEM_NUMBER,
             B.ORDERED_QUANTITY,
             B.PRICE_LIST,
             B.UNIT_SELLING_PRICE,
             B.UNIT_LIST_PRICE,
                   TO_NUMBER (B.ATTRIBUTE7) CUST_SENT_PRICE,
             apps.XXAB_CUST_SENT_PRICE_CONV_SO (C.customer_number,
                                                B.ordered_item,
                                                B.header_id,
                                                B.line_number,
                                                B.unit_selling_price,
                                                B.attribute7,
                                                B.pricing_quantity_uom,
                                                B.attribute4)
                CUST_SENT_PRICE_CONVERTED,
             ABS ( (B.UNIT_SELLING_PRICE
                    - apps.XXAB_CUST_SENT_PRICE_CONV_SO (C.customer_number,
                                                         B.ordered_item,
                                                         B.header_id,
                                                         B.line_number,
                                                         B.unit_selling_price,
                                                         B.attribute7,
                                                         B.pricing_quantity_uom,
                                                         B.attribute4)))
                DIFFERENCE,
                      MTP.ORGANIZATION_CODE,
             B.SHIP_TO_LOCATION
        FROM OE_ORDER_HEADERS_V A,
             OE_ORDER_LINES_V B,
             RA_CUSTOMERS C,
             MTL_PARAMETERS MTP,
             MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_B MSI
       WHERE     A.HEADER_ID = B.HEADER_ID
             AND A.SOLD_TO_ORG_ID = C.CUSTOMER_ID
             -- Added by Gati on 19-Oct-2012, tkt - INC000000118962
             AND ROUND (TO_NUMBER (apps.XXAB_CUST_SENT_PRICE_CONV_SO (
                                      C.customer_number,
                                      B.ordered_item,
                                      B.header_id,
                                      B.line_number,
                                      B.unit_selling_price,
                                      B.attribute7,
                                      B.pricing_quantity_uom,
                                      B.attribute4)),
                        2) <> B.UNIT_SELLING_PRICE
             --AND ROUND(TO_NUMBER(B.ATTRIBUTE7), 2) <> B.UNIT_SELLING_PRICE
             --AND     a.ship_from_org_id = mtp.organization_id
             AND B.SHIP_FROM_ORG_ID = MTP.ORGANIZATION_ID          -- GRW 20060413
             --AND     a.ship_from_org_id = msi.organization_id
             AND B.SHIP_FROM_ORG_ID = MSI.ORGANIZATION_ID          -- GRW 20060413
             AND B.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID = MSI.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID       -- GRW 20060407
             AND A.ORDER_SOURCE_ID = 6
             AND A.ORG_ID = B.ORG_ID
             AND TO_CHAR (A.ordered_date, 'DD-MON-YYYY') between  '01-NOV-2013' and  '03-NOV-2013'
             and mtP.organization_code='BRM'
                      AND A.ORG_ID = (SELECT HOU.ORGANIZATION_ID
                               FROM HR_OPERATING_UNITS HOU
                              WHERE HOU.NAME = '50 ACCO Canada')
             AND B.cancelled_flag <> 'Y'
             AND B.flow_status_code <> 'CANCELLED'
             AND B.ORDERED_ITEM <> 'INVALID_ITEM'
    ORDER BY a.order_number

    Hi,
    Assuming your initialization matches your discoverer login, it is pretty weird that you get no data.
    I am not sure how you got the SQL but i suggest you trace the session to get the exact SQL ran by the discoverer.
    You may find another condition or join that limits your data.
    Also another thing that you should try is to initial the session by using all the parameters (including the security group as you have in your discoverer login):
    begin
      fnd_global.APPS_INITIALIZE(user_id =>, resp_id =>, resp_appl_id =>, security_group_id =>);
    end

  • Discoverer report returns no data from a certain time

    Using Discoverer 10g,a discoverer report which returned data normally last month gets to return no data now.
    We have four same environments, and two of them has this problem, two is OK.
    And the SQL of the discoverer of the four environments are the same.
    We have no any changment of this discoverer and related EUL for more than one year....
    How should we investigate into this issue.
    For example ,a point we should notice or something...
    Could somebody give us a suggestion?
    Thank you.

    Thanks for your qiuck reply.
    1.empty table that is joined in the query.The four environments has almost the same data,it is not the cause.
    2.security issue with the data, maybe the security definitions are different from one environment to another.we are now invesgate into this cause.
    and there is a sql of the discoverer's EUL which shows no data in a enviroment(in this enviroment discoverer report gets no data), but in another enviroment data can show.
    the sql is as following.
    =============
    SELECT loc_bu.org_id
    ,loc_bu.location_id building_id
    ,loc_bu.building building_name
    ,loc_bu.location_code building_number
    ,loc_fl.location_id floor_id
    ,loc_fl.location_code floor_number
    ,loc_fl.floor floor_name
    ,loc_of.location_id office_id
    ,loc_of.location_code office_number
    ,loc_of.office office_name
    ,loc_of.suite office_suite
    ,loc_of.location_alias office_alias
    ,loc_of.assignable_area office_assignable_area
    ,loc_of.space_type_lookup_code office_space_type_code
    ,lst.meaning office_space_type
    ,loc_of.function_type_lookup_code office_function_type_code
    ,fun.meaning office_function_type
    ,(SELECT ffv.description
    FROM fnd_flex_values_vl ffv
    ,fnd_flex_value_sets ffvs
    WHERE ffv.flex_value = loc_of.attribute1
    AND ffv.flex_value_set_id = ffvs.flex_value_set_id
    AND ffvs.flex_value_set_name = 'MB_PN_ON') occupancy_exception_flag
    ,loc_of.active_start_date
    ,loc_of.active_end_date
    --ADD BY KEVIN 2008/6/26 START
    ,loc_of.attribute7 division_code_office
    ,(SELECT ffv.description
    FROM fnd_flex_values_vl ffv
    ,fnd_flex_value_sets ffvs
    WHERE ffv.flex_value = loc_of.attribute7
    AND ffv.flex_value_set_id = ffvs.flex_value_set_id
    AND ffvs.flex_value_set_name = 'MB_PN_DIVISION') division_description_office --ヌヨ-ホ・ヒオテ・
    --ADD BY KEVIN 2008/6/26 END 
    FROM pn_locations loc_bu
    ,pn_locations loc_fl
    ,pn_locations loc_of
    ,fnd_lookups fun
    ,fnd_lookups lst
    WHERE loc_bu.location_id = loc_fl.parent_location_id
    AND loc_bu.location_type_lookup_code IN ('LAND', 'BUILDING')
    AND nvl(loc_bu.attribute6, '99') <> '01'
    AND loc_fl.location_id = loc_of.parent_location_id
    AND loc_fl.location_type_lookup_code IN ('FLOOR', 'PARCEL')
    AND nvl(loc_fl.attribute6, '99') <> '01'
    AND loc_of.location_type_lookup_code IN ('OFFICE', 'SECTION')
    AND nvl(loc_of.attribute6, '99') <> '01'
    AND loc_of.function_type_lookup_code = fun.lookup_code(+)
    AND fun.lookup_type(+) = 'PN_FUNCTION_TYPE'
    AND loc_of.space_type_lookup_code = lst.lookup_code(+)
    AND lst.lookup_type(+) = decode(loc_of.location_type_lookup_code,
    'OFFICE',
    'PN_SPACE_TYPE',
    'SECTION',
    'PN_PARCEL_TYPE')
    AND nvl(loc_of.space_type_lookup_code,'99') <> '07';
    ====================
    Ps.before excute this sql, we always first excute following command.
    ====
    begin
    fnd_client_info.set_org_context(117);
    end;
    ====
    The analyst of our team is not very good at the security problem, could you help us?
    Thanks a lot.

  • Open discoverer report in new browser window and without connections page

    Hi All,
    We are using Oracle 11g Discoverer 11.1.1.4.  Requirement is to open the discoverer report in a new browser window and without connections page.
    When we are running discoverer reports with this parameters we unwantedly get the connections page of the discoverer plus which we don't want.
    Went through the documentation given in this page and followed it still the issue persists, and i see couple of threads with my issue and no updates.
    This excerpt is from the documentation available in the link
    " _plus_popup=true and framedisplaystyle=embedded launches Discoverer Plus in a new pop-up browser window that contains the Plus applet embedded in it "
    http://www.art2dec.com/documentation/docs/oas10g1012/linux/bi.1012/b13918/urlstart.htm
    and Here is what we use to invoke our reports.
    http://ipaddress:port/discoverer/plus?cn=cf_123&_plus_popup=TRUE&framedisplaystyle=EMBEDDED&wb=disc_wb_1
    Request the forum users from PRO discoverer group to help me out of this issue and expect a good discussion on this.
    Thanks in advance

    Closing the thread
    We were able to achieve by changing the browser settings in the IE 8 Browser. Disabled Tabbed browsing.

  • Invoking a Discoverer Report from a web page written in JSP

    Hi,
    We are using Discoverer 10.1.2 against a relational database. We are not using the OLAP option.
    I have a requirement wherein users would like link to a Discoverer Report from a web application which is not deployed in Oracle Portal. So Discoverer portlets are not the solution.
    I basically need to be able to provide the Report URL in the JSP page.
    Has anybody done this ? Can you please provide some pointers towards how to generate the Discoverer report URL to invoke the report from a JSP ?
    Thanks
    Manav

    Discoverer URL parameters can be found here in the Configuration Guide here:
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/html/B13918_03/urlstart.htm#sthref888
    Note, that you cannot pass the password in the URL (security restriction) so you will need to use Public or Private connections and pass the connection ID or use an HTML form to build the URL using the POST method.
    Or, you can fill in the desired fields and let the user enter their username/pwd.
    Hope that helps get you started.
    Regards,
    Steve.

  • Invoking Discoverer Report from Zoom Menu Option

    HI there
    I've seen this on client site but never done it myself. Does anyone have any documentation or guidance on how to set up a form personalization so that the zoom menu option on a form links to a discoverer report, potentially passing parameter values to limit the data? Can forget the parameter side if it's complicated for now as we don't have any full requirements.
    Many thanks for any help
    Cheers, Kate

    Hi
    Zoom functionality is very simple just follow the bellow steps
    • Enter the Form Personalization form. (M) Help > Diagnostics > Custom Code > Personalize.
    • Rule Seq: 10
    • Description: Create Menu Item
    • Trigger Event: WHEN-NEW-FORM-INSTANCE
    • Context: User and set the value to your user name (don't forget to do this for every Rule you define)
    • Select the Actions tab
    • Actions Seq: 10
    • Type: Menu
    • Menu Entry: SPECIAL31
    • Menu Label: Discoverer Report
    • Rule Seq: 30
    • Description: Open Discoverer Report
    • Trigger Event: SPECIAL31
    • Context: User and set the value to your user name
    • Actions Seq: 10
    • Type: Builtin
    • Builtin Type: Launch a Function
    • Function Code: XXX---Function name
    • Function Name: wil be defaulted from the code
    • Save your work and exit all the forms.
    Try it out!!!

  • Oracle Discoverer report shows drilldown icon in Web version

    Hi ,
    I am trying to create a new CROSS TAB Discoverer report. I made all my development done using the Discoverer desktop edition and is fine. When I saved in the database and showed the same report the User, in the Web Version, the report shows ' >' icon in all the cross tab headings and when the cursor is moved there, it gives an option to Drill down.
    We have 3 fields which are selected but not shown in the report. It shows the drill down to those 3 fields.
    My questions is:
    1. I should not allow users to drill down. It should not show that option.
    How to disable that option in the Web Version.
    Any help in this regard is highly appreciated.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Kiran Kesari

    Yogini is correct, but the solution provided will remove drill capability for all users under all circumstances. This is a "shortcoming" of Disco. If you set up a hierarchy for the users to use for drilling, the users must have the drill out privilege. This has the additional effect of adding the "Drill to related..." feature to most (and I believe all) columns.

Maybe you are looking for