Discount in Invoice Lines

Hi. I'm trying to make an invoice with DI that has different discounts in its lines (not in the header's discount). I use oDoc.Lines.DiscountPercent in the apropiate line to give a % discount value but it is ignored and appears in the header's discount...
It's a bug or I am doing something wrong?
Thanks in advance...

The line level at the document works like this:
1. the pricebefdi (price before discount is inherited from the previous document, or set based on the price field.)
2. the discount field affects the price field
3. the price field reflects the discount.
If all three values are already set then adjusting the price will affect the discount. ie multiply the price by .9 to get a 10 percent discount in the discount field.
If you have no values in any of these fields try this: set the pricebefdi (price before discount first). Then set the price field to the discounted amount, this should populate the discount amount.
Regardless- you cannot directly set the discount. You must adjust the price from its original non zero value.

Similar Messages

Calculating discount on invoice lines

Hello All,
I am having a little trouble accuratley calculating a discount percentage for line items on my invoice report, generally the calculations work ok however on the odd occasion where oracle has rounded the selling price in order management i get inaccurate percentages. Let me demonstrate,
A customer orders a product at £7.75 and a 10% discount is applied to the line giving £6.975 which oracle rounds to £6.97... This is passed to AR and i am then trying to work out the percentage difference between 7.75 and 6.97 which gives 10.1!!! My calculations work ok its just that the earlier rounding throws the percentage off a little and i really dont want to show 10.1 to the customer and i cant round to 0dp or the nearest whole number as some customers get 12.5% discount.
Has anyone come across this if so how did you get round the problem or does any one have an idea how i can solve the problem.
Regards

I know what you mean, it should work. There is a group for Works Order Number, and I have moved all data to this GH section to make exporting to Excel easier.
Some of the works orders contain a single process, these are the ones that are accurate. Any that contain more than one are the problem. Each process has a cost attached to it, and all I want is a total cost no matter how many processes are contained in the Works Order.
I tried several other formula without success. There is a field {WorksOrderHeader.TotalProcessCost} which works with multiple lines, however I cannot use this as the report should only show internal processes, and we some that are external. So if a works order contains 2 processes, one in and one out, the total cost should only be for the internal. WOH.TotalProcessCost does not work in these instances. I've used Select Expert to remove lines for external, using the process primary key (AVOID), but despite this if I use the WOH.TotalProcessCost field ALL lines are calculated.
Any further advice would be most welcome!
Nick

XML INVOICE Report RAXINV, Taxline is repeating for each invoice line

Hi Tim
Thanks a lot for your blog
Greeting !!
I have successfully created XML report for AR invoice Printing learning from your blog but stuck to a problem , whenever Invoice is having multiple lines ,say 20, then for each invoice line there is tax line printing 20 times like this:
PART NO.| CUSTOMER PART#/DESCRIPTION | UNIT PRICE | QUNTITY|
A123 | 34 WELD-ROD | 52 | 22 |
Tax Exempt @ 0.00
A234 | 238-AL WIER | 63 | 55 |
Tax Exempt @ 0.00
........ Assume there are 20 lines then tax line also repeating 20 times which i don't want .It should get printed only once if it is same
pls help me to achieve this
Thanks
Rahul

Thanks Tim for Your Instant reply.
I have gone through your duplicate line elimination but my requirement is not this
I'll explain it, I am using LINE_DESCRIPTION tag for printing item description and this tag have two value for it, when the LINE_TYPE =LINE then LINE_DESCRIPTION tag is printing the line description and if LINE_TYPE =TAX
then LINE_DESCRIPTION tag is printing the taxline information. Now if I have 20 lines in Invoice then the tax line will also repeat for 20 times, and if i use duplicate line elimination logic and I have same item it'll not print that item, some times whole invoice become blank.
So I want to print 20 lines and out of that 15 lines are have same tax rate then it should print once at the end of 15th line and for remaining 5 lines if tax rate is different for each line then it should print at the end of each line (5lines)
In the linetreevariable i used <xsl:variable xdofo:ctx="incontext" name="invLines" select=".//G_LINES [LINE_TYPE!='FREIGHT']"/> i.e. I want only line type=LINE and TAX
Thanks
Rahul

Missing information when updating invoice line

Dear all,
I am updating invoice line information but system giving and error
declare
begin
for rec in (select l.*
from ap_invoices_all l
where invoice_num = 'akp/445'
and vendor_id = 1068
and org_id = 82) loop
AP_INVOICES_PKG.Update_Row(X_Rowid => 'AABDoVAGSAACZlRAAM',
X_Invoice_Id => rec.invoice_id,
X_Last_Update_Date => rec.last_update_date,
X_Last_Updated_By => rec.last_updated_by,
X_Vendor_Id => rec.vendor_id,
X_Invoice_Num => rec.invoice_num,
X_Invoice_Amount => rec.invoice_amount,
X_Vendor_Site_Id => rec.vendor_site_id,
X_Amount_Paid => rec.amount_paid,
X_Discount_Amount_Taken => rec.discount_amount_taken,
X_Invoice_Date => sysdate,--rec.invoice_date+30,
X_Source => rec.source,
X_Invoice_Type_Lookup_Code => rec.invoice_type_lookup_code,
X_Description => rec.description,
X_Batch_Id => rec.batch_id,
X_Amt_Applicable_To_Discount => rec.amount_applicable_to_discount,
X_Terms_Id => rec.terms_id,
X_Terms_Date => rec.terms_date,
X_Goods_Received_Date => rec.goods_received_date,
X_Invoice_Received_Date => rec.invoice_received_date,
X_Voucher_Num => rec.voucher_num,
X_Approved_Amount => rec.approved_amount,
X_Approval_Status => rec.approval_status,
X_Approval_Description => rec.approval_description,
X_Pay_Group_Lookup_Code => rec.pay_group_lookup_code,
X_Set_Of_Books_Id => rec.set_of_books_id,
X_Accts_Pay_CCId => rec.accts_pay_code_combination_id,
X_Recurring_Payment_Id => rec.recurring_payment_id,
X_Invoice_Currency_Code => rec.invoice_currency_code,
X_Payment_Currency_Code => rec.payment_currency_code,
X_Exchange_Rate => rec.exchange_rate,
X_Payment_Amount_Total => rec.payment_amount_total,
X_Payment_Status_Flag => rec.payment_status_flag,
X_Posting_Status => rec.posting_status,
X_Authorized_By => rec.authorized_by,
X_Attribute_Category => rec.attribute_category,
X_Attribute1 => rec.attribute1,
X_Attribute2 => rec.attribute2,
X_Attribute3 => rec.attribute3,
X_Attribute4 => rec.attribute4,
X_Attribute5 => rec.attribute5,
X_Vendor_Prepay_Amount => rec.vendor_prepay_amount,
X_Base_Amount => rec.base_amount,
X_Exchange_Rate_Type => rec.exchange_rate_type,
X_Exchange_Date => rec.exchange_date,
X_Payment_Cross_Rate => rec.payment_cross_rate,
X_Payment_Cross_Rate_Type => rec.payment_cross_rate_type,
X_Payment_Cross_Rate_Date => rec.payment_cross_rate_date,
X_Pay_Curr_Invoice_Amount => rec.pay_curr_invoice_amount,
X_Last_Update_Login => rec.last_update_login,
X_Original_Prepayment_Amount => rec.original_prepayment_amount,
X_Earliest_Settlement_Date => rec.earliest_settlement_date,
X_Attribute11 => rec.attribute11,
X_Attribute12 => rec.attribute12,
X_Attribute13 => rec.attribute13,
X_Attribute14 => rec.attribute14,
X_Attribute6 => rec.attribute6,
X_Attribute7 => rec.attribute7,
X_Attribute8 => rec.attribute8,
X_Attribute9 => rec.attribute9,
X_Attribute10 => rec.attribute10,
X_Attribute15 => rec.attribute15,
X_Cancelled_Date => rec.cancelled_date,
X_Cancelled_By => rec.cancelled_by,
X_Cancelled_Amount => rec.cancelled_amount,
X_Temp_Cancelled_Amount => rec.temp_cancelled_amount,
X_Exclusive_Payment_Flag => rec.exclusive_payment_flag,
X_Po_Header_Id => rec.po_header_id,
X_Doc_Sequence_Id => rec.doc_sequence_id,
X_Doc_Sequence_Value => rec.doc_sequence_value,
X_Doc_Category_Code => rec.doc_category_code,
X_Expenditure_Item_Date => rec.expenditure_item_date,
X_Expenditure_Organization_Id => rec.expenditure_organization_id,
X_Expenditure_Type => rec.expenditure_type,
X_Pa_Default_Dist_Ccid => rec.pa_default_dist_ccid,
X_Pa_Quantity => rec.pa_quantity,
X_Project_Id => rec.project_id,
X_Task_Id => rec.task_id,
X_Awt_Flag => rec.awt_flag,
X_Awt_Group_Id => rec.awt_group_id,
X_Pay_Awt_Group_Id => rec.pay_awt_group_id,
X_Reference_1 => rec.reference_1,
X_Reference_2 => rec.reference_2,
X_Org_Id => rec.org_id,
X_global_attribute_category => NULL,
X_global_attribute1 => NULL,
X_global_attribute2 => NULL,
X_global_attribute3 => NULL,
X_global_attribute4 => NULL,
X_global_attribute5 => NULL,
X_global_attribute6 => NULL,
X_global_attribute7 => NULL,
X_global_attribute8 => NULL,
X_global_attribute9 => NULL,
X_global_attribute10 => NULL,
X_global_attribute11 => NULL,
X_global_attribute12 => NULL,
X_global_attribute13 => NULL,
X_global_attribute14 => NULL,
X_global_attribute15 => NULL,
X_global_attribute16 => NULL,
X_global_attribute17 => NULL,
X_global_attribute18 => NULL,
X_global_attribute19 => NULL,
X_global_attribute20 => NULL,
X_calling_sequence => null,
X_gl_date => rec.gl_date,
X_award_Id => rec.award_id,
X_approval_iteration => rec.approval_iteration,
X_approval_ready_flag => rec.approval_ready_flag,
X_wfapproval_status => rec.wfapproval_status,
X_requester_id => rec.requester_id,
X_quick_credit => rec.quick_credit,
X_credited_invoice_id => NULL,
X_distribution_set_id => NULL,
X_FORCE_REVALIDATION_FLAG => NULL,
X_CONTROL_AMOUNT => NULL,
X_TAX_RELATED_INVOICE_ID => NULL,
X_TRX_BUSINESS_CATEGORY => NULL,
X_USER_DEFINED_FISC_CLASS => NULL,
X_TAXATION_COUNTRY => NULL,
X_DOCUMENT_SUB_TYPE => NULL,
X_SUPPLIER_TAX_INVOICE_NUMBER => NULL,
X_SUPPLIER_TAX_INVOICE_DATE => NULL,
X_SUPPLIER_TAX_EXCHANGE_RATE => NULL,
X_TAX_INVOICE_RECORDING_DATE => NULL,
X_TAX_INVOICE_INTERNAL_SEQ => NULL, -- bug 8912305: modify
X_QUICK_PO_HEADER_ID => NULL,
x_PAYMENT_METHOD_CODE => rec.payment_method_code,
x_PAYMENT_REASON_CODE => null,
X_PAYMENT_REASON_COMMENTS => null,
x_UNIQUE_REMITTANCE_IDENTIFIER => null,
x_URI_CHECK_DIGIT => null,
x_BANK_CHARGE_BEARER => null,
x_DELIVERY_CHANNEL_CODE => null,
x_SETTLEMENT_PRIORITY => null,
x_NET_OF_RETAINAGE_FLAG => null,
x_RELEASE_AMOUNT_NET_OF_TAX => null,
x_PORT_OF_ENTRY_CODE => null,
x_external_bank_account_id => null,
x_party_id => null,
x_party_site_id => null,
x_disc_is_inv_less_tax_flag => null,
x_exclude_freight_from_disc => null,
x_remit_msg1 => null,
x_remit_msg2 => null,
x_remit_msg3 => null,
x_remit_to_supplier_name => null,
x_remit_to_supplier_id => null,
x_remit_to_supplier_site => null,
x_remit_to_supplier_site_id => null,
x_relationship_id => null,
x_original_invoice_amount => null,
x_dispute_reason => null);
commit;
end loop;
exception
when others then
dbms_output.put_line(sqlerrm);
end;
ORA-20001: APP-SQLAP-10000: ORA-01403: no data found occurred in
AP_INVOICES_PKG.UPDATE_ROW<-
with parameters (X_Rowid = AABDoVAGSAACZlRAAM, X_invoice_id = 180867)
while performing the following operation:

Hi;
Please review:
R12: Validate Invoice Errors APP-SQLAP-10000, ORA-01403 and ORA-20001 [ID 1308869.1]
R12: Master Note: Consolidated Error Notes Of EBTax Related Issues In Oracle Payables [ID 1378068.1]
By the way If you make search at metalink such as APP-SQLAP-10000: ORA-01403: ORA-20001 there are 38 doc avaliable, please review them
Regard
Helios

AP: Invoice Imports/ Miscellaneous Invoice Line types

Hi All,
I had two issues while I was importing my invoices in AP through AP Invoices Open interface:
1. Freight Charges
2. Some Unit Royality Charges.
Both of these things are not included in my PO, so I needed to create additonal invoice distribution lines with in the same invoice and also had to assign a GL account while creating the invoices. The other Item type lines get the GL account code from PO while matching is done during AP Open Import process.
The Freight charges problem is resolved. The solution for that is as follows for your reference.
Functional Steps:
1. With Accounts Payables Manager responsibility , go to
Setup->Options->Payables.
2. Select Invoice from drop down list box.
3. In invoice region Ceck the Automatically Create Freight Distribution Option.
4. Supply default Freight Account for Freight Distributions.
Technical Steps:
1. Create an additional Invoice distributions line for freight in AP_INVOICE_LINES_INTERFACE table which should not have the PO level information.
2. Set AP_INVOICE_LINES_INTERFACE.Prorate_across_flag = 'Y'
3. AP_INVOICE_LINES_INTERFACE.line_type_lookup_code = 'FREIGHT'
4. Set AP_INVOICE_LINES_INTERFACE.LINE_GROUP_Number as same in both the ITEM and Freight Invoice distribtuion line which are interrelated.
The above resolves the Freight issue and you can reproduce it in your environment.
However, I have another amount from my supplier which is called "Royality Charge" on every item which are also not present in my PO. My supplier sends these charges with Invoice lines the same way Freight charges are sent. I am thinking of creating additional Invoice lines marked as "Miscellaneous" Invoice Lines type for this charge. The problem I am facing with Miscellaneous Lines is that I cannot find a place where I can setup the Account code for such Invoice distribution lines, like I got for Freight Type Distribution lines as described above in Functional steps. Can anyone guide me in this regard or can give me an alternative workaround to handle my Unit Royality Charges?
Thanks
Faisal .
[email protected]
null

Apologies for the late response, have only just spotted the question.
You will need to register "line-item job-level chains of approval" under payables transaction type before you can select it from the picklist:
Setup\Action Types\"Use Existing Action Type" button, then select action type and continue.
Hope this helps (if you haven't already resolved yourself)
James

R12 - AP Invoice Lines Interface & Tax Codes

We have a slight problem getting AP Invoice Lines through the Payables Open Interface. In 11i the value held in the TAX_CODE column was validated (against AP_TAX_CODES I believe), and if wrong or missing the line was rejected. The eTRM for R12 claims this column is still validated, although against ZX_TAXES_B, however testing shows this to be untrue. Support documentation from Oracle (e.g. note 472649.1) suggest a number of other columns are now used for tax validation, however testing agains shows this to be untrue. The only column we can find which is validated is TAX_CLASSIFICATION_CODE, and if this column contains a valid tax code then the invoice line will be accepted, however we cannot find any documentation which shows that this column should be used.
Has anyone out there bottomed out this issue, and if so is there any insight you could offer?
Many thanks.
Edited by: user13317468 on Jul 4, 2011 1:32 AM

Hi Vinod,
please check the below reference from oracle support ...
Case Study: How Payables Open Interface Import works with EB Tax for importing Invoices [ID 1381400.1]
Regards,
Ivruksha

AR Invoice Presentation / Invoice Lines diff than Sales Order Lines

Hi,
Due to business rules I got the following requirement, I'd like to get advice or second opinions please:
Instead of showing 200 lines we want to show 1 line in the invoice summarizing the job done.
The requirement is:
The invoice should summarize the Order Lines, meaning that we want to have different lines in the invoice than those in the orders composing the invoice. The total amounts must equal between both, the invoice and the orders lines been invoiced.
For example:
We need to create an Invoice for 2 Sales orders with 10 lines each, each line for $1 usd.
The invoice could be in any of these situations:
- Having only one line composing the 2 orders. The invoiced amount is $20.
- Having 2 lines composing the 2 orders. The invoiced amount is $20 ($10 line 1, $10 line 2)
The description on the invoice lines must be completly open.
Internaly, the link/reference between the invoice line and the order line(s) composing it must be kept.
This must work with 1 or more Sales Orders (partial or complete)
Can be done via autoinvoice or not. (The user is able to compose and reference the invoice manually)
¿Is there already something done that I can use? Just point me on one direction and I'd be happy to investigate.
I already have 1 or 2 ideas of how to achieve this without customizing at all.
Just wanted to check and get advice and second opinions on this before taking a decision.
Technical Spec:
Oracle EBS 11i (11.5.10.2)
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0
Thanks in advance.
Juan Alcocer

seems to error
APP-AR-11526
ORA-28115
seems the security policy is implemented at your database leval and check which ID you are using to insert the record.Check with your DBA, for security to resolve first for ORA-28115.
Disabled in case if you have any custom triggers defined on RA_CUSTOMER_TRX_ALL.
Few Documentation for ORA-28115
ORA-28115 with EXEMPT ACCESS POLICY privilege
A user USER1 has been granted select, insert, update, delete on all
tables of an application schema (USER2) that uses row-level security.
The RLS policies cover select, insert, update, and delete, and have check option enabled. USER1 has also been granted EXEMPT ACCESS POLICY system privilege.
Each table in the USER2 schema has a trigger that causes insertion of
a row into an audit table whenever DML is performed. When USER1 performs DML on a USER2 table, the operation fails with

Issue in XML Invoice lines

Hi,
I designed layout for invoice report in xmlp 5.6.2, I have issue when i preview the output, instead of two Invoice lines i am getting 8 times with the repeating of 2 lines.I given the following tags....
Before line : <?for-each:G_INVOICE_LINES?>
End of lines : <?end for-each?>
waiting for tips.
Regards
Prabusiva

Hi Tim/Andrew,
I have only 2 lines for the invoice but when i run the preview in pdf, this 2 lines repeating 4 times. so far i am getting 8 lines.
This is the following tags for lines part
<LIST_G_INVOICE_LINES>
<G_INVOICE_LINES>
<LIST_G_LINE_ALLOC> </LIST_G_LINE_ALLOC> <LIST_G_LINE_COMMENT> /LIST_G_LINE_COMMENT> <LIST_G_LOT_NO_IN_LOTS> </LIST_G_LOT_NO_IN_LOTS>
</G_INVOICE_LINES>
</LIST_G_INVOICE_LINES>
In the RTF template in the starting line i given this <?for-each:G_INVOICE_LINES?> and end of the line i given this <?END FOR-EACH?>
Still i showing only 8 lines but i want to display only 2 lines.
Can any one know please drop your ideas.
with cheers
prabu

Insert/Update/Delete Non-PO Invoice Line Item via FM/BAPI?

Does anyone know of a way to insert/update/delete an Invoice Line item (Non-PO Accounting Invoice - Transaction FB60 or FV60) using a BAPI or Function Module (or set of function modules) using ABAP? I have been trying to find some code to accomplish this and am stuck on a couple of issues.
I have found PRELIMINARY_POSTING_FB01 and PP_CHANGE_DOCUMENT_ENJ but both seem to submit the details to background processes. This is an issue because it gives the user a success message after execution but later delivers the error to Workflow. This is for an interfacing program so the results should be as real time as possible.
Has anyone accomplished this via FM or BAPI and if so would you mind sharing your experiences?
Thank you very much,
Andy

SG- Thank you for the reply.
I have been playing with BAPI_INCOMINGINVOICE_PARK and I'm not sure if it is doing exactly what we want, but it is something that I have considered in the past. I plan on looking into BAPI_ACC_INVOICE_RECEIPT_POST this morning, hopefully that will provide some more for us.
If possible I'd like to avoid BDC sessions because this program could hypothetically interface with multiple SAP systems with different configurations.
I will check into those FM's and thank you very much.

Printing fixed number of Invoice Line in rtf template with level two group

Hi,
I have to print fixed number of invoice lines on a page. Invoce tempalte design has a table with header and summary(Invoice , tax and shiping totals) at each page in table footer. The table should repeate at each page with header and footer. I need to print specific number of rows or number of rows wihich page can accumulate in table body on each page.
I checked few blogs giving solution for fixed number of rows printing say
"Anatomy of a Template I - Fixed Row Enumeration"(http://blogs.oracle.com/xmlpublisher/2007/03/27/)
and
http://oracle.anilpassi.com/xml-publisher-developing-reports-printed-on-pre-printed-stationary-2.html
Above two blogs explanation has only one group at line level. but in my case there are two groups (Parent and child) at line level. I am able to count rows in parent group but it is not counting lines in child group.
Edited by: Bhanu Yadav on Apr 19, 2011 2:10 AM

Will it be possible for you to move the 1st and 3rd sections to header/footer?
So that if the 2nd section spills over to next page too, starting position of 3rd section wont be affected.

Credit Memo DFF does not contain information from the original invoice line

Hi
Customer is facing issue mentioned in Note: 364999.1
Issue: Created a credit memo against the invoice and noticed that the resulting credit memo lines do not contain the DFF information from the original invoice lines.
I found through Metalink that this issue was reported to Oracle for release 11.5.7.
Looks like the fix was to provide a check box in RAXSUMSC.fmb.
- One off Patch for 11.5.7 - Bug / Patch 2803629 (one-off patch)
- One off Patch for 11.5.8 - Bug / Patch 3411221 (one-off patch)
- 11.5.9 - nothing available !!!!
As per bug 2675652 the issue was fixed in a file RAXSUMSC.fmb, version 115.41 This BUG shows that it has been fixed by in 11.5.10
Customer is using 11.5.9 which has RAXSUMSC.fmb, version 115.40, we cant apply patches for 11.5.7 or 11.5.8 that are available.
Any pointers on what can be done ?
Thanks,

Hi Pat,
the project code (PC) on the marketing document may only be applied to the business partner (BP), hence the only row in the associated journal entry (JE) with this project code is that of the BP.
You can link project codes to specific accounts (CoA -> select account -> account details -> project code) & this project code will then be assigned every time the account is found in a JE.
If you require the project code to be applied to the freight, you may assign this project code to the account you have defined for this freight. The drawback is naturally that the project code will then be pulled every time this freight is used, regardless of whether or not the PC is associated with the BP or not.
It is possible to manually assign project codes to every row in a journal entry, hence this should also be possible with SDK. You might explore the possibility whether it might be possible to automatically assign the BP PC to all rows in the JE using a script.
All the best,
Kerstin

Factoring discount in invoice list

What is the meaning of factoring discount in invoice list and when it is applicable?
If client don't want to apply it then how should i remove it from the invoice list screen?
As the requirement of the client is to consolidate all the billing document of the customer?
What are the prerequisite of the invoice list as per my understanding the header data of all the billing document should be same?
Correct me if i am wrong.
Regards,
Satya

hi,
factoring discount is used in invoice list to give a discount on the total value of all the billing docs.
eg
suppose there are 10 invoices and the value of the item goes above 1lakh, maybe the customer can ask an additional dicount because of the huge value of business he is generating. hence the company
decides to give an additional discount on that 1lakh, which is called factoring discount.
maintain 0 as its condition record RL00
prerequisites:
Condition type RL00 (factoring discount) must be maintained and, if required, also the condition type MW15.
An invoice list type must be assigned to each billing type that you want to process in invoice lists. The standard version of the SAP R/3 System includes two types of invoice lists: LR for invoices and debit memos, LG for credit memos.
Copying requirements must be defined (for example, the payer, terms of payment and other fields that must be identical in the documents to be included in the invoice list)
In addition, before you process an invoice list, you must maintain the following master data:
A customer calendar must be defined, specifying the time intervals or dates on which invoice lists are to be processed.
The customer calendar must be entered in the Billing Sales Area view of the customer master record.
Pricing condition records for the condition type RL00 and, if necessary, (e.g. in Germany) the condition type MW15 must be maintained.
Output condition records for condition types LR00 and RD01 must be created.
regards,
anand

Invoice line items - inconsistant data returned from RV_BILLING_PRINT_VIEW

Hi there,
We are using a modified version of SAP standard Print Program RVADIN01 for our invoices, for many years now.
Everything works fine 99.9% of the time. Every now and again though, there is issue with the invoice, the root of which is data brought back from RV_BILLING_PRINT_VIEW .
From debugging the latest issue, I can see that the standard FM RV_BILLING_PRINT_VIEW, which is bringing back data for line items, is not filling all the data in certain cases.
For example, yesterday we had an invoice with 10 line items - this FM brought back full data for 9 line items, but the first was missing data in fields such as LAND_WE, SPRAS_WE etc. This then lead to a problem with text being read from T604T for that line.
I've checked that data being sent to RV_BILLING_PRINT_VIEW, and it looks correct.
I've checked and been assured that Master data is maintained correctly etc.
Does anyone have any thoughts on this or experience of something similar?
Thanks,
David

Hi Vijaymadhur,
Thanks for your response - I checked again in VF03, and the Ship-to is maintained for this line.
Infact, the second invoice line is almost identical to the first (except for quantity) and the FM brings back the correct ship-to etc. for that line.
Thanks,
David

Invoice line items report from DSO compared to Infocube (in HANA)

Hi Folks,
As you know Invoice line items are very granular level information. We are facing performance issues on reports based on the Infocubes to display this information. We are migrating to HANA and looking for options to improve the performance. One of the option we are looking at is instead of Infocube can we we report directly on the DSO. I would like to know whether it will help and its Pro & Con's. Please help.
Thanks,
B

Hi B,
Reading data from a DSO instead of an InfoCube will not improve reporting performance. The benefit in getting rid of the cube is that you have less loading to do. You still need cubes for planning and inventory scenarios.
You do not need a composite provider to report from DSOs in BW. Once you've migrated to HANA you use DSOs just as you would today, and you can report from a multiprovider. Yes, you can use a composite provider, but it is not necessary.
If your report is slow today, you need to find out where it is slow. HANA could provide a huge benefit as soon as you migrate, or it might not help much. It depends on the scenario. OSS 1681396 is a good place to start.
If the DB time is long, and you're not using BWA today, you can expect big benefits when you migrate to HANA.
If the OLAP time is long, you might see big benefits when you migrate, as the OLAP engine during query execution is pushing more to HANA.
If the frontend time is long, migrating to a different database isn't likely to change that, you'd need to address that separately.
Finally, an important point to remember is that once you've migrated you open up additional possibilities for improvement that are not available to you in BW-on-non-HANA. For example, you might be able to rewrite queries as HANA models. I did some performance tests on this in a very simple case of exception aggregation.

Relation between Invoice Line items and Accounting Line item

Dear All,
My requirement is to print all the invoice documents and it's tax values like cenvat, Ecess, BED and VAT.
I have to fetch these tax details from BSEG table .
I' am getting Invoice number ( RBKP-BELNR ) from BKPF-AWTKEY .
Can any one please tell me how to relate the Invoice line items and Accounting document line items..
Any BAPI or FM is there to retrieve these data.
Please do needful in this regard.

Hi,
from table bseg - field Koart
K = Vendor
D = Customer
S = G/L account here tax lines identify with buzid = T
or take table bset for taxes
Andreas

Discount in Invoice Lines

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for