Discoverer Query

Hi,
I have created a custom folder in discoverer by using the following query from Oracle 9i SQL:
SELECT 
TO_NUMBER(fv.BUDGET) as Budget 
,gab.ACTIVITY_50274 as Project
,gad.ACCOUNT_50297 as Category       
,fv.DESCRIPTION as DESCRIPTION  
,NVL(( TO_NUMBER(fv.BUDGET) ),0)-NVL(( DECODE(gab.PROJECT_50297,80067,
NVL(DECODE(SUBSTR(gab.ACCOUNT_50297,1,3),123,( SUM(gab.PERIOD_TO_DATE_CR) ),0),0)
*0,NVL(DECODE(SUBSTR(gab.ACCOUNT_50297,1,3),123,( SUM(gab.YEAR_TO_DATE_CR) ),0),0)) ),0) as Budget_Balance,
FROM
        GLFG_ACTUAL_BALANCES gab ,
        GLFG_GL_ACCOUNTS_DESCR  gad, 
      ( select flex_value_set_id,Flex_value_id,flex_value Project,
      description,Attribute2 Budget,Attribute3 Contract_Number,Attribute4 CR_Number,
        Attribute5 Project_type,Attribute6 Supplier_name,Attribute7 Target_date
        ,Attribute8 PO_Amount,Attribute9 Currency_code
        From FND_FLEX_VALUES_VL  where   FLEX_VALUE_SET_ID= 1009618
        )fv --o408896,
     ,( SELECT ggp.PERIOD_NAME AS pname
        , MAX(ggp.PERIOD_NUMBER) AS pnumber
        FROM GLFG_GL_PERIODS ggp
        GROUP BY ggp.PERIOD_NAME)
WHERE
    ( (gad.ACCOUNT_ID = gab.ACCOUNT_ID)
   and (fv.PROJECT = gab.PROJECT_50297(+))
  -- and fv.project= '080162'
   and (gab.PERIOD_NAME = pname(+)))
      AND (gab.ACTIVITY_50274(+) NOT LIKE '0000%')
   and gab.currency='USD'
   UNION
SELECT DISTINCT
  to_number(ffv.ATTRIBUTE2)--"Budget"
,ffv.FLEX_VALUE-- "Project"    
  ,'Blank'-- "Category",
  ,ffv.DESCRIPTION,
   ,to_number(ffv.ATTRIBUTE2)-- "Budget Balance" 
FROM
FND_FLEX_VALUES_VL      ffv
WHERE  ffv.FLEX_VALUE not in (select PROJECT_50297 from glfg_actual_balances )
and ffv.FLEX_VALUE_SET_ID = 1009618the discoverer 10g report results are grouped by gl periods. For the blank category (the second query in the union), i need the record of any blank category project to continue showing up in the next gl period in the blank category until the gl date that it shows up with in the first query.
For example if a project x was in blank for the first time at gl date May 08 and is in second query for first time in Sep 08. Then project x record should be in the blank category for the GL periods June08,July08, and August08.
Any ideas are appreciated.
Edited by: user4826145 on May 18, 2009 6:05 AM//Apologies for the confusing question
Edited by: user4826145 on May 18, 2009 6:09 AM

user4826145 wrote:
Yes. there is period with name ADJ%
What do you suggest?There are two options open for you.
1. Filter out the PERIOD_NAME which has adjustment values.
The following illustration may help in that case.
SQL> SELECT col_2, col_1,
  2         TO_CHAR (MAX (TO_DATE (col_1, 'MON-YY')) OVER (PARTITION BY col_2),
  3                  'MON-YY'
  4                 ) max_period
  5    FROM (SELECT 'SEP-08' col_1, 1 col_2
  6            FROM DUAL
  7          UNION ALL
  8          SELECT 'MAY-09' col_1, 1 col_2
  9            FROM DUAL
10          UNION ALL
11          SELECT 'ADJ-08' col_1, 1 col_2
12            FROM DUAL
13          UNION ALL
14          SELECT 'DEC-08' col_1, 2 col_2
15            FROM DUAL
16          UNION ALL
17          SELECT 'JAN-09' col_1, 2 col_2
18            FROM DUAL
19          UNION ALL
20          SELECT 'ADJ-09' col_1, 2 col_2
21            FROM DUAL)
22   WHERE UPPER (col_1) NOT LIKE 'ADJ%'; -- Restriction implied here
     COL_2 COL_1  MAX_PERIOD
         1 SEP-08 MAY-09
         1 MAY-09 MAY-09
         2 DEC-08 JAN-09
         2 JAN-09 JAN-09
4 rows selected.OR
2. Treat Adj% Value as NULL and continue. The following example might help:
SQL> SELECT * FROM TEST_TAB;
     SR_NO PERIOD_NAM
         1 MAR-08
         1 APR-09
         1 ADJ-08
         1 SEP-08
         2 ADJ-08
         2 JAN-09
         2 DEC-08
         2 NOV-08
8 rows selected.
SQL> SELECT sr_no, period_name,
  2             TO_CHAR
  3                (MAX (TO_DATE (CASE
  4                                 WHEN period_name LIKE 'ADJ%'
  5                                   THEN NULL
  6                                 ELSE period_name
  7                                 END,
  8                              'MON-RR'
  9                              )
10                    ) OVER (PARTITION BY sr_no),
11              'Mon-RR'
12              ) MAX_PERIOD
13     FROM test_tab;
     SR_NO PERIOD_NAM MAX_PERIOD
         1 MAR-08     Apr-09
         1 APR-09     Apr-09
         1 ADJ-08     Apr-09
         1 SEP-08     Apr-09
         2 ADJ-08     Jan-09
         2 JAN-09     Jan-09
         2 DEC-08     Jan-09
         2 NOV-08     Jan-09
8 rows selected.Regards
Jo
Edited by: Joice John [Removed a wrong code]
Edited by: Joice John Corrected the Code

Similar Messages

  • Discoverer Query is taking too much time

    Hi,
    I am having performance problems with some queries in Discoverer(Relational). Discoverer is taking around 30 minutes to run the report. But if I run the same query through TOAD it takes only 5 to 6 seconds. Why it is so ?
    Structure of Report:
    The report is using crosstab with 3 dimensions on the left side and 3 dimensions on the page items.
    Why the performance in the discoverer is slow and how can I improve it ?
    Thanks & Kind Regards
    Rana

    Hi all
    Russ' comments are correct. When you use crosstabs or page items, Discoverer has to execute the entire query before it can bring back any results. This is a known factor that should be taken into account when end users create workbooks.
    The following conditions will greatly impact performance:
    1. Crosstabs with many items on the left axis
    2. Multiple Crosstab values
    3. Page items with a large set of values,
    4. Crosstabs or page items that use complex calculations,
    5. Multiple page items
    Thus, users must avoid building worksheets that use too many of the above. As commented previously, this is well documented in the forums and on the Oracle website and should not come up by surprise. If it does then either suitable training has not been given to the end users or Oracle's own end user documentation has not been read. Section 6 of the Discoverer Plus user guide has the following advice:
    Whether you are using Discoverer Plus Relational to perform ad hoc queries, or to create reports for other end users, you want to minimize the time it takes to run queries and reports. By following a few simple design guidelines, you can maximize Discoverer performance.
    Where possible:
    use tabular reports rather than cross-tabular reports
    minimize the number of page items in reports
    avoid wide cross tabular report
    avoid creating reports that return tens of thousands of rows
    provide parameters to reduce the amount of data produced
    minimize the number of worksheets in workbooks
    remove extraneous worksheets from workbooks (especially if end users frequently use Discoverer’s export option, see Notes below)
    Notes:
    When end users export data in Discoverer Plus Relational or Discoverer Viewer, they can export either the current worksheet or all the worksheets. In other words, they cannot selectively choose the worksheets to be exported. Remove extraneous worksheets so that extra data is not included when end users export all worksheets.
    I hope this helps
    Regards
    Michael

  • Date Functions in Discoverer Query

    Hi,
    It has been a while since I logged into the forum. Sorry at present my contribution is only to get help. Hope to help others in future.
    Here is teh problem I am facing.
    We have frequent requirement to get the sales comparison by last year to this year
    in Week to Date, Month to Date, Year to Date timeline.
    To accomplish I use Custom Date functions in my Discoverer which results in query like below
    SELECT o100229.curr_division_code,
    SUM (DECODE (discotw_admin.fiscal_cal_by_wk.flyrweek (:fyrweek),
    o100059.fiscal_year_week, o100341.tot_lines_ext_i_s_avg_cst,
    0
    The "discotw_admin.fiscal_cal_by_wk.flyrweek (:fyrweek)" is the function I use to get the Last year week number nased on the parameter for this week number.
    But the problem with this approach is it fires the Function every time a record is read by the query which makes the query to run long time.
    Is there anyway I can use a subquery that fires the function only once and use the value of the function in the main query in Discoverer.
    I did tried to create a custom folder for the Date functions and use it in the query so that the query references the field on the cusom folder. But still I do not see any improvement in the performance.
    Thanks in advance
    Jay

    Hi Jay
    Yes, calculating like this on every row will have a drag on performance.
    Have you considered using one of the analytic functions LAG or LEAD? They are designed for this type of reporting.
    If you have considered them and rejected them can you explain why.
    Another possibility is to use a SUM analytic like this:
    SUM(Selling Price SUM)
    OVER(PARTITION BY Size,Product
    ORDER BY TO_DATE("Year",'YYYY')
    RANGE BETWEEN INTERVAL '1' YEAR PRECEDING
    AND INTERVAL '1' YEAR PRECEDING )
    The caveat here is that RANGE INTERVAL must be a YEAR and the ORDER BY must return a date!
    Does this help?
    Best wishes
    Michael

  • Trying to cancel Discoverer query - it's taking along time to cancel ....

    Hi Everyone,
    I cancelled a query bec. it was taking a long time to run
    Now it's taking a long time to cancel
    The admin is out to lunch...
    any advice pls, thx, sandra

    Hi Sandra
    Typically the reason for canceling a query is that it has been running too long - right?
    Behind the scenes, one of two things is happening, either:
    1. The query was having a hard time finding any data and is still searching, or
    2. The query has found some data but not enough to satisfy the query governor settings
    For the latter, depending upon how much data has so far been retrieved, Discoverer has to put that data somewhere. This is called a cache. The more data you put into a cache the more has to be cleared out of it should you decide not to proceed. This is probable what happened to you.
    By the way, when you cancel a query you're generally asked a question about whether Discoverer should keep the last change but return no data. If you click Yes in reply to this question this is generally what triggers the clearing of the cache. Most of the time I just click No, even if I made a small change. I tend to get my query back quick.
    Finally, if your Discoverer worksheet is a Crosstab or it uses Page Items, or even both at the same time, this is one of the causes of a long running query. In any of these scenarios, Discoverer has buckets to compute and it has no idea how many buckets to allow for until it has read all of the data.
    In my Discoverer 10g Handbook and in my training courses I talk about The Query From The Twilight Zone. This are the queries that never or seems like never return any data and either time out or have to be stopped manually. Sometimes these runaway queries are trying to return every row of data from the database but more typically they are caused by the overcasual use of page items or Crosstabs.
    Hope this synopsis helps
    Best wishes
    Michael

  • Discoverer query a logical standby rather than production via db link

    Hello,
    I have read in some oracle documentation that oracle does not support discoverer on a logical standby database because the EUL tables need write access. So oracle recommends having the EUL tables on a write enabled database (Production) and then link to data on a logical standby.
    Is anyone doing something like this currently? I am curious how this would be configured? And is it worth it?
    Thanks

    Hi Olivier
    You need to point your EUL folders at the other database using a database link. Then whenever Discoverer sees that folder it will call the database link and the data will come from the other database.
    Therefore, you need to have a schema on the other database that has SELECT permissions on all of the objects that you want to query. After satisfying yourself that you have such a schema, on the local database you create a database link to the other database using the schema that has the permissions. In order to create the database link your will of course need to be logged on locally using an account that has permission to create such a link and you will need to know the password of the schema in the other database.
    If you don't create a PUBLIC database link you will also need to make sure that your EUL owner and all of your users can access it. More often than not I will use a PUBLIC database link which saves all the trouble.
    Here is a script for a PUBLIC database link. The link is called LOCAL_TO_STANDBY and as you can see the user I am connecting as is called APPS with a password of STANDBY_APPS (entered in the IDENTIFIED BY section):
    CREATE PUBLIC DATABASE LINK LOCAL_TO_STANDBY
    CONNECT TO APPS
    IDENTIFIED BY STANDBY_APPS
    USING '(DESCRIPTION =  (ADDRESS_LIST = (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = 10.10.10.20)(PORT = 1521)) ) (CONNECT_DATA =  (SERVICE_NAME = STANDBY)  )  )';
    You will of course have to change your database connection information by altering the IP address or the host or replacing this with a fully qualified domain name, you then have to provide the PORT and the SERVICE_NAME for the database you will be connecting to.
    To test the connection, try this:
    SELECT FROM DUAL@LOCAL_TO_STANDBY;
    Does this help?
    Best wishes
    Michael

  • Is there a place to put comments in a Discoverer query

    Hi Everyone,
    Is there a place to put comments, so that I/others can understand the query and its processing?
    pls advise, tx, sandra

    Well, you have the Worksheet Title area, at the top of the report/workbook, and the Worksheet Text area, at the bottom of the report/workbook. Those are the areas available for you to type in text about the worksheet. Yes, there is a limit on what you can key in, but you can key in a decent amount of text. If you need to type in more text, then what you may want to consider is setting up some kind of shared folder on the network for Discoverer users to access. Create a separate document for each workbook and type away to your heart's content on whatever documentation you want for that workbook. You could always submit an enhancement request to Oracle to increase the limit on the number of characters you can type into the title and text areas. My opinion is that if you have a large amount of text you want to type, type it up in a separate word document and make that document available to the users. You can reference to that document in your workbook text, and maybe give some briefer text in the workbook itself. Something to think about.
    John Dickey

  • Discoverer & Query Builder 6.0

    Can I use Oracle Discoverer and Query Builder 6.0 with Oracle Financials database for quering the details ? How do i connect ?
    Will i have a connect string for oracle financials? If yes, where can i find the same ?
    Kindly reply

    Saving Query Builder queries in the database is no longer supported for target databases 9i and higher (Bugs 29995928 and 2264640). You still can save queries in the filesystem as .brw files.

  • Discoverer Query Export

    How can I automate the export of a scheduled query to an Excel spreadsheet on a daily basis?

    One way to do this would be to schedule a batch job through the OS that uses the command line parameters for Discoverer to export the workbook or sheet to an Excel spreadsheet. Hope this helps you.

  • Discoverer Query please help me....

    In our application we have created a user table through which application access is given to the users. Due to this the user has limited access of the application data.
    For example –
    User A has rights for entering purchase order of department A. So he only view purchase orders of department A.
    Is there any way in which restricted data access can be given in Discoverer. (Referring the above example)
    If there please let me know.

    And I'll add another 3cents to what Puppethead said.
    This is one of those age ol' aguments between tech-types (us) and DBAs (them) - okay, I'm sure there's some DBAs on this forum.
    As Puppethead says, a view is nothing more than a SQL statement, and if you think about it, you're just wrapping a CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW AS ... statement around the exact same SQL statement.
    Additionally, just for some more info, Oracle Apps, BIS, NoetixViews, etc. have literally thousands upon thousands of views, so I'll side with Oracle.
    Would adding a middle thingy (computer term) around a SQL statement make a difference in run time? I suppose it's an extra weight so I'll add 1/2 nano-second or so. But as pointed out already, a badly written view - like a badly written SQL statement may add 1/2 hour to a query.
    Views ... luv 'em.
    Russ

  • Help with a Discoverer Query

    Hi
    can anyone help me create the fields I need below.
    I have a table in disco, below is an extract.
    Subj     Parent     Subj Desc
    5001     P500     Non-Executive Dir
    P500     PBOA     Chairman & Non-Executives
    PBOA     PAYX     PAY BOARD
    PAYX     EXPE     PAY EXPENDITURE
    EXPE     INCE     GROSS EXPENDITURE
    INCE     TOTA     INCOME AND EXPENDITURE
    For each line in the above I want to create 6 levels which will contain all the parents.
    eg
              Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Level 4 Level 5     Level 6
    5001     Non-Executive Dir     P500     PBOA     PAYX     EXPE     INCE     TOTA
    I only need this for the bottom level which ranges from 0000 to 9999
    i.e. I won't need this for P500 etc .
    Hope this make sense.
    Thanks for your continued help.
    Andy

    Hi,
    There are basically two ways you can do this. Either create a custom folder that contains a hierarchical query, e.g.
    select substr(subj_path, 2, instr(subj_path, ',', 1,2)-2) subj,
    substr(desc_path, instr(desc_path, ',' ,1,1)+1, instr(desc_path, ',' ,1, 2) - instr(desc_path, ',' ,1, 1)-1) level1,
    substr(desc_path, instr(desc_path, ',' ,1,2)+1, instr(desc_path, ',' ,1, 3) - instr(desc_path, ',' ,1, 2)-1) level2,
    substr(desc_path, instr(desc_path, ',' ,1,3)+1, instr(desc_path, ',' ,1, 4) - instr(desc_path, ',' ,1, 3)-1) level3,
    substr(desc_path, instr(desc_path, ',' ,1,4)+1, instr(desc_path, ',' ,1, 5) - instr(desc_path, ',' ,1, 4)-1) level4,
    substr(desc_path, instr(desc_path, ',' ,1,5)+1, instr(desc_path, ',' ,1, 6) - instr(desc_path, ',' ,1, 5)-1) level5,
    substr(desc_path, instr(desc_path, ',' ,1,6)+1, instr(desc_path, ',' ,1, 7) - instr(desc_path, ',' ,1, 6)-1) level6
    from (
    select sys_connect_by_path (subj_desc, ',')||',' desc_path, sys_connect_by_path (subj, ',')||',' subj_path, level slevel from subject
    connect by subj = prior subj_parent start with subj between '0000' and '9999'
    ) a
    where slevel=6
    Alternatively, create level1 complex folder in the EUL and drag in the contents of your subject folder. Then join it to the subject folder using subject.parent = level1.subj. Then create a level2 folder in the same way and join it to the level1 folder. Continue in this way until you have done all 6 levels. You will then be able to create a report taking a level from each folder.
    Rod West

  • SQL query to find all the custom folders in Discoverer (query posted)

    I know its not a question I am posting..this is just to inform community users that this query makes life easier in case someone wants to find out all the custom folders in a particular EUL (folder name starting with XX)
    select b.ba_name,f.obj_name folder_name,f.obj_id,f.obj_ext_owner Owner
    from
    APPS.EUL5_objs f
    , APPS.EUL5_ba_obj_links l
    , APPS.EUL5_bas b
    where 1=1
    and f.obj_id= l.bol_obj_id
    and b.ba_id= l.bol_ba_id
    and b.ba_name like 'XX%'
    order by b.ba_name,f.obj_name;
    Hopefully it would be useful to others!

    Connect as sysdba and try..
    To list all objects >100M in size.
    SQL> select owner, segment_type, segment_name, sum(bytes)/(1024*1021) from dba_segments
    group by owner, segment_type, segment_name
    having sum(bytes)/(1024*1021) > 100
    For tablespaces ..
    select tablespace_name, sum(bytes) tablespace_size
    from dba_data_files
    group by tablespace_name
    union all
    select tablespace_name, sum(bytes) tablespace_size
    from dba_temp_files
    group by tablespace_name
    order by tablespace_name

  • Discoverer doesn't run the same query than TOAD

    Hi,
    I'm trying to make the following in Discoverer version 10.1.2:
    To display some records of a table using a condition and display the total of all of them of the same table. I'm trying to create a custom folder with the following query:
    SELECT PRSTDCLA
    FROM PROVEIDER
    UNION ALL
    WHERE ( PRSTDCLA = 1 )
    SELECT SUM(PRSTDCLA)
    FROM PROVEIDER;
    If I run this query in TOAD, the result is the correct. But when I run it in a Desktop worksheet, the result obtained is one row: the total of the whole table.
    Why Desktop doesn't display the correct result?
    Thanks.

    Every numeric field in Discoverer has a default aggregation method. By default, this is set to sum. When you are creating the query in Discoverer, you need to click on the plus next to PRSTDCLA and select "detail" when you are creating your Discoverer query. Otherwise, it will automatically try and group by the non-aggregated column. In this case, you aren't selecting any other columns, so there aren't any other columns to group by and you get one row.
    In Discoverer admin, you can change the default aggregation method for the PRSTDCLA field so that it displays the details (and does not aggregate by default).
    Also, why put the total in the folder definition? Discoverer can put the Total at the bottom of the table for you. Just create a new "Total".
    Hi,
    I'm trying to make the following in Discoverer
    version 10.1.2:
    To display some records of a table using a condition
    and display the total of all of them of the same
    table. I'm trying to create a custom folder with the
    following query:
    SELECT PRSTDCLA
    FROM PROVEIDER
    UNION ALL
    WHERE ( PRSTDCLA = 1 )
    SELECT SUM(PRSTDCLA)
    FROM PROVEIDER;
    If I run this query in TOAD, the result is the
    correct. But when I run it in a Desktop worksheet,
    the result obtained is one row: the total of the
    whole table.
    Why Desktop doesn't display the correct result?
    Thanks.

  • Discoverer report not working on R12 !

    We have just migrated to R12 from 11i and some of the discoverer query is not working, but the same is working fine when we ran thru SQL Developer or TOAD.
    Is there any context (mo_global.set_policy_context) needs to be set in Discoverer report to get the data?
    Thanks

    Thanks Srini,
    There is no any specific error message, the strange thing is if I run the Discoverer report is not returning any data, but if I set the mo_global.set_policy_context ('S',111) in SQL Developer or TOAD and then run the discoverer report it return data...
    Any pointers?

  • Error while running a Discoverer Workbook with parameter from command line

    I am trying to run a discoverer report from command line and export the results in xls on to my local machine. I could do it fine for a simple workbook, but if I add a parameter(madatory) to the workbook and run it from command line specifying the parameter value I wanted to run the report for, I do not get any results. Here is the command line I am using.
    dis51usr.exe /connect user/password@database /apps_user /apps_responsibility "System Administrator" /eul EUL_US /open C:\Disco\Test.DIS /sheet Testsheet /parameter Period Jan-07 /export xls C:\Disco\X.xls /batch
    Parameter value is entered in correct format(Jan-07).
    When I removed /batch from this to see if I get any error, Discoverer Desktop opened up, logged in and gets terminated saying 'Oracle Discoverer Desktop has encountered a problem and need to close. We are sorry for the inconvenience.'
    Did anybody come across this issue before?

    Hello,
    If you have a few minutes, Windows is also aborting for me:
    the differences are, my situation is:
    a) am running the command line from a .bat file
    b) am NOT running with parms, want the discoverer query to come up for the user
    c) am running a query from the database
    i am signing in as myself BUT running a query that was created by a generic user called SREG
    c) if i run the .bat file from Windows Explorer, the query opens fine
    d) if i execute the .bat file from within Microsoft Access using the shell command,
    the query opens and then aborts RIGHT BEFORE the parm screen would display
    e) btw, if i modify the .bat file, to run a query from MY database signon, then (d) - running .bat file
    from vb using SHELL command works
    Do you have a ideas as to why (d) does not work? I would be very grateful for your time, tx, sandra
    this is what i posted yesterday, tx: Re: Running Discoverer command line
    tx, sandra

  • Database migrated from Oracle 10g to 11g Discoverer report performance issu

    Hi All,
    We are now getting issue in Discoverer Report performance as the report is keep on running when database got upgrade from 10g to 11g.
    In database 10g the report is working fine but the same report is not working fine in 11g.
    The query i have changed as I have passed the date format TO_CHAR("DD-MON-YYYY" and removed the NVL & TRUNC function from the existing query.
    The report is now working fine in Database 11g backhand but when I am using the same query in Discoverer it is not working and report is keep on running.
    Please advise.
    Regards,

    Pl post exact OS, database and Discoverer versions. After the upgrade, have statistics been updated ? Have you traced the Discoverer query to determine where the performance issue is ?
    How To Find Oracle Discoverer Diagnostic and Tracing Guides [ID 290658.1]
    How To Enable SQL Tracing For Discoverer Sessions [ID 133055.1]
    Discoverer 11g: Performance degradation after Upgrade to Database 11g [ID 1514929.1]
    HTH
    Srini

Maybe you are looking for

  • Was Not Installed Properly? Windows x64 Bit...

    Hello, I seem to be having a problem installing the latest version of iTunes onto my Windows XP Pro 64Bit Computer... Once iTunes is installed, everytime i open it i get an error message pop-up, which reads the following... "itunes was not properly i

  • ITunes asking for nonexistent Office 2000 CD when syncing to iPhone

    A friend syncs his iPhone with his PC using iTunes for Windows. After a recent update, he gets a dialog asking him to insert his Office 2000 CD-ROM shortly after connecting his phone to his PC. Presumably the sync process is generating a need for som

  • Does not play video

    Dear sir my mobile model is nokia x3-00. The problem is my mobile does not play any video. When i play any video it play audio well but the frames of video does not display. I also update my phone software but still it does not play video. What is pr

  • Pages Textwrapping to Next Page

    Hey guys, Sorry if this is redundant with another topic. It's only my 2nd day on a Mac so I'm a little lost right now. In Pages, I've noticed that text seems to wrap an entire paragraph to the second page when you are typing, leaving a large amount o

  • How to disable distortion correction for micro 4/3 lens

    Hello, I have an Olympus E-P2 and Panasonic 14-45mm lens.  Adobe Lightroom 3 and Photoshop CS5 appear to be performing some very heavy-handed distortion correction at the wide-end of the zoom (running the file through a different raw converter yields